Climate Change Policy - International Energy Agency · Climate Change Policy ... Command and...
-
Upload
phunghuong -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Climate Change Policy - International Energy Agency · Climate Change Policy ... Command and...
© OECD/IEA 2012
Takashi Hattori Head of Environment and Climate Change Unit, IEA
Climate Change Policy – framework and recent developments –
© OECD/IEA 2012
Outline
Climate change: evidence and impacts
Climate negotiations “101”
The challenge for the energy sector
[Break for discussion]
Climate policy options & policy packages
© OECD/IEA 2012
Outline
Climate change: evidence and impacts
Climate negotiations “101”
The challenge for the energy sector
[Break for discussion]
Climate policy options & policy packages
© OECD/IEA 2012
What is the greenhouse effect?
Source: Climate Change Indicators in the United States, 2nd edition, US EPA
© OECD/IEA 2012
Potential tipping points
Collapse of the West Antarctic or
Greenland ice sheets
Disruption of East Asian
Monsoon
Retreat of Arctic sea ice
© OECD/IEA 2012
What we know
Human activities are changing the climate
Long-term gradual effects (e.g., rise in average global temperatures and sea level)
Some types of extreme events (e.g., heat waves, heavy precipitation) are happening more frequently and with more intensity
Climate system may experience abrupt, unpredictable, and potentially irreversible changes with highly damaging impacts
© OECD/IEA 2012
What does this mean…
Climate change will have to be combated on two fronts: mitigation and adaptation
Reduce GHGs emissions (mitigation) => stabilise the concentration of GHGs => limit the global temperature increase
In 2011, countries agreed to a 2°C target
Stabilising emissions at 450 ppm corresponds to a 50/50 chance of meeting this goal
Adaptation to climate change impacts we are already locked into
© OECD/IEA 2012
Outline
Climate change: evidence and impacts
Climate negotiations “101”
The challenge for the energy sector
[Break for discussion]
Climate policy options & policy packages
© OECD/IEA 2012
UNFCCC History
1992 UNFCCC
To “avoid dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system
195 Parties (countries) have ratified
Annexes of developed and developing countries (Annex I, non Annex-I)
1997 Kyoto Protocol
Binding emissions caps for developed countries
Credits under CDM for projects in developing countries
2008-12 First Commitment Period, 2013-2019 Second Period
© OECD/IEA 2012
2007 Bali launched negotiation of new commitments for developed countries and “Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions” for developed countries
2009 Copenhagen: 2C goal, $100B finance by 2020, mitigation from all countries (but no centralised architecture). Formalised in Cancún 2010.
2011 COP17 Durban: Extended Kyoto Protocol to 2020, Agreed to negotiate a new climate treaty with legal commitments for all countries
2012 COP 18 Doha: “Cleared the decks”
Agreed details of Kyoto Protocol extension text
Closed previous negotiating tracks (fast-start finance delivered, review launched, other work sent to COP “subsidiary bodies” SBSTA and SBI)
UNFCCC History
© OECD/IEA 2012
UNFCCC History
Durban Doha Warsaw Lima Paris
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Concepts Content
2013 COP 19 Warsaw: Half-way in the ADP Track
Preparation for commitments in 2014 (agree information needed, timelines, review process)
Building pre-2020 ambition
© OECD/IEA 2012
Key Issues for COP 19
1. Ratifications of Kyoto Protocol
2. Resolve procedural voting dispute
3. Clarify Finance (capitalise Green Climate Fund (GCF), plan for scale-up to $100B per annum mobilised)
4. Technical elements under SBI/SBSTA
New market mechanism, linking domestic markets (FVA), MRV for NAMAs and REDD, CDM improvements
5. ADP progress
6. Loss and Damage
© OECD/IEA 2012
Key Issues for COP 19
1. Ratifications of Doha amendments to Kyoto Protocol
Outcomes:
So far 4/144 required ratifications
Bangladesh
Barbados
United Arab Emirates
Mauritius
© OECD/IEA 2012
Key Issues for COP 19
2. Resolve procedural dispute on decision-making:
(For now)
Outcomes:
Forward-looking consultations underway
© OECD/IEA 2012
Key Issues for COP 19
3. Clarify Finance (capitalise Green Climate Fund (GCF), plan for scale-up to $100B per annum mobilised)
Outcomes:
No interim finance milestones
Biennial high-level dialogue on finance
$100M for adaptation fund, $280M for REDD
GCF still awaiting operationalisation/capitalisation
© OECD/IEA 2012
Key Issues for COP 19
4. Technical elements under SBI/SBSTA
New market mechanism, linking domestic markets (FVA), MRV for NAMAs and REDD, CDM improvements
Outcomes:
Agreed: MRV for NAMAs/Cancún pledges
REDD rules
No progress: New Market Mechanism and FVA
CDM essentially on hold awaiting ADP
© OECD/IEA 2012
Key Issues for COP 19
5a. ADP progress: Workstream 1 (new climate agreement)
Outcomes:
Contributions (not “commitments”) to be communicated by Q1 2015 (if ready), “without prejudice to the legal nature of the contributions”
Information that will be provided “to facilitate clarity, transparency, and understanding” of the contributions to be agreed at COP20
Drafting timeline accelerated: text before COP20
… But nothing yet on structure of new agreement
© OECD/IEA 2012
Key Issues for COP 19
5b. ADP progress: Workstream 2 (Pre-2020 ambition)
Outcomes:
Intensify technical work on opportunities with short-term high mitigation potential (e.g. energy efficiency), with a view to promoting voluntary cooperation.
….. Expect technical workshops in early 2014
© OECD/IEA 2012
Key Issues for COP 19
6. Loss and Damage
Outcomes:
Agreement reached: Loss and damage mechanism established within Adaptation framework (subject to review).
© OECD/IEA 2012
Figure 1: Summary of 2020 pledge types
1
10
100
1,000
10,000
1 10 100 1,000 10,000
An
nu
al G
HG
em
issi
on
s in
20
10
exc
l. L
ULU
CF
sin
ks (
MtC
O2-e
q)
GDP in 2010 (billion 2005 USD, PPP)
No pledge
Intensity goal
Absolute cap
BAU goal
Carbon neutrality
Other goal
US
China
India
Japan
Russia
South Africa Germany
Brazil
Eritrea
Indonesia
Mexico
Republic of Korea
Iran
Turkey
Australia
Saudi Arabia
Thailand
Myanmar
Spain
Poland
Ethiopia
Morocco
Costa Rica
Tanzania
Togo
Note: Bubble sizes are proportional to population in 2010.
Absolute cap
Carbon neutrality
Intensity goal
Reduction from BAU
Other goal
No pledge
Source: Briner and Prag 2013 (CCXG)
Current Pledges
© OECD/IEA 2012
Country Negotiating Blocks
EIG (Mexico, Liechtenstein, Monaco, the Republic of Korea and Switzerland)
European Union
AILAC (Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Panama and Peru)
Umbrella Group: (More or less) Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand,
Norway, the Russian Federation, Ukraine and the USA
G77 (+China)
LDCs (50 least-developed countries)
AOSIS (43 low-lying and small island countries)
Also BASIC, OPEC, …
© OECD/IEA 2012
The road to 2015
2014: “Year of Ambition” Elements of negotiating text June 2014
UN Leaders’ Summit September 2014
COP 20 Peru December 2014: negotiating text to be on the table
2015: Year of Negotiation May 2015 full negotiating draft
COP 21 Paris December 2015: Agreement?
© OECD/IEA 2012
2015 20202013 2014
Agreement of any bounded flexibility for commitments and ex-ante information to be provided
Consultations on draft commitments
Clarification and ratcheting-up of draft commitments
Submission of draft commitments
Possible further ratcheting-up of mitigation commitments after 2015
Discussions on ex-post accounting rules for measuring progress towards commitments
2015 agreement
A possible process
Source: Briner and Prag, CCXG 2013
Technical
track
UNFCCC
CE
M
WE
F D
AV
OS
LE
AD
ER
S
SU
MM
IT
Political
track ??
© OECD/IEA 2012
Outline
Climate change: evidence and impacts
Climate negotiations “101”
The challenge for the energy sector
[Break for discussion]
Climate policy options & policy packages
© OECD/IEA 2012
Decoupling energy use from economy
Reducing the energy intensity of the economy is vital to achieving the 2DS.
Source: ETP 2012
© OECD/IEA 2012
All technologies have roles to play
© OECD/IEA 2012
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2009 2020 2030 2040 2050
Gt C
O2
Power generation efficiency and fuel switching 3% (1%)
Nuclear 8% (8%)
End-use fuel switching 12% (12%)
End-use fuel and electricity efficiency 42% (39%)
Renewables 21% (23%)
CCS 14% (17%)
Technology contributions to reaching the 2DS vs 6DS
Source: ETP 2012
© OECD/IEA 2012
Issues for the energy sector
What would it really take for energy sector investment to shift onto a 2C path?
How does review/ratcheting of climate commitments put forward by countries fit with:
Investment decisions
Domestic energy policymaking
How to capture need for long-term energy sector transformation AND short-term emissions targets (technology, infrastructure lock-in)?
© OECD/IEA 2012
Outline
Climate change: evidence and impacts
Climate negotiations “101”
The challenge for the energy sector
[Break for discussion]
Climate policy options & policy packages
© OECD/IEA 2012
Group Discussion
What impacts of climate change are being felt in your country? What is the state of awareness on this subject and does it get much attention in media and political circles?
Are you aware of any specific climate or energy policies being used to address GHG emissions at local or national levels? What technologies and policies are likely to be most relevant in your country context?
Are other issues related to water, pollution, environment, or energy security playing into your country’s climate change policy debate?
© OECD/IEA 2012
Outline
Climate change: evidence and impacts
Climate negotiations “101”
The challenge for the energy sector
[Break for discussion]
Climate policy options & policy packages
© OECD/IEA 2012
The global climate change problem
Considered to be the most significant challenge of the 21st century…
… but why is it so difficult to solve?
The earth’s climate is a global public good
Energy is an essential economic input
The relevant timeframe is very long
Key uncertainties are large and varied
Distributional impacts can be large
Policies to control GHGs are still relatively new
© OECD/IEA 2012
Price-based
instruments
Taxes on CO2 directly Taxes/charges on inputs or outputs of process (e.g. fuel and vehicle taxes) Subsidies for emissions-reducing activities Emissions trading systems (cap and trade or baseline and credit)
Command and
control
regulations
Technology standards (e.g. biofuel blend mandate, minimum energy
performance standards)
Performance standards (e.g. fleet average CO2 vehicle efficiency)
Prohibition or mandating of certain products or practices
Reporting requirements
Requirements for operating certification (e.g. HFC handling certification)
Land use planning, zoning
Technology
support policies
Public and private RD&D funding Public procurement Green certificates (renewable portfolio standard or clean energy standard) Feed-in tariffs Public investment in underpinning infrastructure for new technologies Policies to remove financial barriers to acquiring green technology (loans,
revolving funds)
Information and
voluntary
approaches
Rating and labelling programmes Public information campaigns Education and training Product certification and labelling Award schemes
Climate change policy options
© OECD/IEA 2012
Price of CO2
€/tCO2e
MtCO2
Policies to unlock energy
efficiency blocked by non-
economic barriers
Carbon price mediates
cost-effective action
economy-wide Technology support
policies to:
• reduce long-term costs
• enable timely scale-up
Reduced long-term
marginal abatement
cost
Infrastructure, Financing
Policy packages can lower costs
© OECD/IEA 2012
International carbon markets
Domestic market mechanisms with link to international carbon
market
(e.g. emissions trading scheme; sectoral trading)
Crediting mechanism linked to international markets
Domestic emission reduction policies
with possible crediting link to international carbon markets
(e.g. NAMA or sectoral
crediting)
Carbon markets
© OECD/IEA 2012
Understand fundamentals:
-Abatement potentials, costs
-Macroeconomic impacts
Consider case for further supplementary policies
Assess wider economic effects
Assess interactions, adjust if necessary
REVIEW TO MAINTAIN COHERENCE OVER TIME
Bu
ild C
on
stitu
en
cy fo
r Clim
ate
Ch
an
ge
Re
sp
on
se
Establish Policy Core: Carbon price supplemented by
-Energy efficiency policies
-Technology policies
Regular Review of Policy Packages
© OECD/IEA 2012
Centralised fuel production,power and storage
A smart, sustainable energy system
© OECD/IEA 2012
A sustainable energy system is a smarter, more unified and integrated energy system
Centralised fuel production,power and storage
Renewable energy resources
EV
Co-generation
Smart energysystem control
Distributedenergy resources
Surplus heat
H vehicle2