CLIENT SERVICES Cuyahoga County, OH€¦ · Alexandra S. Parker 212-553-4889 MD-Public Finance...

7
U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE CREDIT OPINION 25 September 2017 New Issue Contacts David Levett 312-706-9990 AVP-Analyst [email protected] Alexandra S. Parker 212-553-4889 MD-Public Finance [email protected] Matthew Butler 312-706-9970 VP-Senior Analyst [email protected] CLIENT SERVICES Americas 1-212-553-1653 Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077 Japan 81-3-5408-4100 EMEA 44-20-7772-5454 Cuyahoga County, OH New Issue - Moody's Assigns Aa2 to Cuyahoga County, OH's Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Summary Rating Rationale Moody's Investors Service has assigned a Aa2 rating to Cuyahoga County's (OH) upcoming $142 million sales tax revenue bond offerings consisting of Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2017A, 2017B, and 2017C (Quicken Loans Arena Project). The outlook on the ratings is stable. Following the sale, the county will have $310 million of sales tax revenue bonds outstanding. The Aa2 special tax sales tax rating largely incorporates Cuyahoga County's general obligation (GO) rating. While the county has favorably covenanted to direct the State of Ohio (Aa1 stable) state Tax Commissioner to directly transfer receipts first to the bond trustee, this does not achieve complete legal divergence. The rating also considers the large economic base from which the tax is generated, a strong 3.0x additional bonds test, healthy coverage of maximum annual debt service, and positive sales tax trend. Credit Strengths » While falling short of complete legal segregation, the direct transfer of pledged sales taxes from the state to the trustee is a strength as is the additional bonds test of 3.0x maximum annual debt service » Broad sales tax base, strong debt service coverage and positive revenue trend Credit Challenges » Lack of required debt service reserve fund partially mitigated by very strong coverage projection and monthly set asides of pledged taxes » Ten-year history of sales tax collections includes a sizeable 10.4% decline in 2009, indicating the potential for significant volatility Rating Outlook The stable outlook is consistent with the outlook on the county's GO rating. It also incorporates an expectation of very healthy debt service coverage given the broad base of the pledged revenue source and generally positive trend in sales tax collections. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade » Upgrade of the county's general obligation rating or achievement of full legal segregation of pledged revenue from the county's general operations

Transcript of CLIENT SERVICES Cuyahoga County, OH€¦ · Alexandra S. Parker 212-553-4889 MD-Public Finance...

Page 1: CLIENT SERVICES Cuyahoga County, OH€¦ · Alexandra S. Parker 212-553-4889 MD-Public Finance alexandra.parker@moodys.com Matthew Butler 312-706-9970 VP-Senior Analyst matthew.butler@moodys.com

U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE

CREDIT OPINION25 September 2017

New Issue

Contacts

David Levett [email protected]

Alexandra S. Parker 212-553-4889MD-Public [email protected]

Matthew Butler 312-706-9970VP-Senior [email protected]

CLIENT SERVICES

Americas 1-212-553-1653

Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077

Japan 81-3-5408-4100

EMEA 44-20-7772-5454

Cuyahoga County, OHNew Issue - Moody's Assigns Aa2 to Cuyahoga County, OH'sSales Tax Revenue Bonds

Summary Rating RationaleMoody's Investors Service has assigned a Aa2 rating to Cuyahoga County's (OH) upcoming$142 million sales tax revenue bond offerings consisting of Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series2017A, 2017B, and 2017C (Quicken Loans Arena Project). The outlook on the ratings is stable.Following the sale, the county will have $310 million of sales tax revenue bonds outstanding.

The Aa2 special tax sales tax rating largely incorporates Cuyahoga County's generalobligation (GO) rating. While the county has favorably covenanted to direct the State ofOhio (Aa1 stable) state Tax Commissioner to directly transfer receipts first to the bondtrustee, this does not achieve complete legal divergence. The rating also considers the largeeconomic base from which the tax is generated, a strong 3.0x additional bonds test, healthycoverage of maximum annual debt service, and positive sales tax trend.

Credit Strengths

» While falling short of complete legal segregation, the direct transfer of pledged salestaxes from the state to the trustee is a strength as is the additional bonds test of 3.0xmaximum annual debt service

» Broad sales tax base, strong debt service coverage and positive revenue trend

Credit Challenges

» Lack of required debt service reserve fund partially mitigated by very strong coverageprojection and monthly set asides of pledged taxes

» Ten-year history of sales tax collections includes a sizeable 10.4% decline in 2009,indicating the potential for significant volatility

Rating OutlookThe stable outlook is consistent with the outlook on the county's GO rating. It alsoincorporates an expectation of very healthy debt service coverage given the broad base ofthe pledged revenue source and generally positive trend in sales tax collections.

Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade

» Upgrade of the county's general obligation rating or achievement of full legal segregationof pledged revenue from the county's general operations

Page 2: CLIENT SERVICES Cuyahoga County, OH€¦ · Alexandra S. Parker 212-553-4889 MD-Public Finance alexandra.parker@moodys.com Matthew Butler 312-706-9970 VP-Senior Analyst matthew.butler@moodys.com

MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE

Factors that Could Lead to a Downgrade

» Declines in annual sales taxes and debt service coverage

» Weakened legal covenants

» Downgrade of the county's general obligation rating

Key Indicators

Exhibit 1

Cuyahoga County

Credit Background

Pledged Revenues Sales Tax

Legal Structure

Additional Bonds Test 3.00

Open or Closed Lien Open Lien

Debt Service Reserve Fund Requirement No DSRF

MADS Coverage

2016 MADS Coverage (x) 8.2x

Trend Analysis

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Debt Outstanding ($000) - - 137,690 147,005 146,730

Revenues ($000) 226,787 237,307 246,767 257,655 272,209

Annual Debt Service Coverage (x) 0.0x 0.0x 0.0x 175.3x 148.8x

MADS includes payments on the 2017 bonds. Coverage excludes the county's 0.25% sales tax set to expire in 2027, though it is pledged until it expires.Source: Cuyahoga County's audited financial statements, Preliminary Official Statement

Recent DevelopmentsSince publishing our credit opinion in May 2017, the county released its fiscal 2016 audited financial statements. The financial resultsare detailed in the financial operations and reserves section of the report. The county delayed the current issuance to October 2017from June 2017.

Detailed Rating ConsiderationsTax Base and Nature of Pledge: Broad sales tax baseThe county's sales tax revenue bonds are special obligations of the county, secured by revenue collected from its 1.25% sales tax. Thepledge is broad with limited major exclusions other than prescription drugs, food and Medicaid-oriented managed care organizations(MCOs). While the county's current sales tax is 1.25% and all associated revenue is pledged to repayment of the bonds, 0.25% of therate expires in 2027 while the county's sales tax bonds do not mature until 2038. The county adopted the additional 0.25% in 2007 tosupport construction and operations of the Global Center for Health Innovation (GCHI) in downtown Cleveland (city rated A1 stable).The bonds issued to finance construction of the GCHI are secured by nontax revenue, but the county intends to continue to repaythose Series 2010F-G bonds, as well as its Series 2014 certificates of participation (hotel project), with the temporary 0.25% sales tax,though sales tax proceeds are not legally required to be used for those payments as they are for sales tax bonds. In fiscal 2016, totalsales tax revenue was $272 million, of which $218 million was generated from the permanent 1% rate.

The county covers a large area of 458.3 square miles. The population dropped 8.2% between 2000 and 2010. American communitysurvey estimates indicate the population continued to decline subsequently, though at a less rapid pace of under half a percent eachyear. The county is estimated to have slipped to the second largest in the state with an estimated population of 1.26 million as of 2015.

This publication does not announce a credit rating action. For any credit ratings referenced in this publication, please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page onwww.moodys.com for the most updated credit rating action information and rating history.

2 25 September 2017 Cuyahoga County, OH : New Issue - Moody's Assigns Aa2 to Cuyahoga County, OH's Sales Tax Revenue Bonds

Page 3: CLIENT SERVICES Cuyahoga County, OH€¦ · Alexandra S. Parker 212-553-4889 MD-Public Finance alexandra.parker@moodys.com Matthew Butler 312-706-9970 VP-Senior Analyst matthew.butler@moodys.com

MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE

Median family income is estimated at 92% of the US median, with a number of wealthy suburbs offsetting the low socioeconomicprofile of Cleveland. The City of Cleveland's urban core is undergoing a revitalization with significant residential and commercialdevelopment.

Debt Service Coverage and Revenue Metrics: Pledged revenue provides very strong coverageDespite a decline in receipts projected for fiscal 2017, we expect the county's sales taxes will continue to provide very ample coveragedebt service on outstanding and Series 2017 revenue bonds given positive trends in collections. Although secured by sales taxes, half ofthe debt service on the current offering is expected to be paid by the NBA's Cleveland Cavaliers through increased rental payments. Thecounty intends to cover the remaining half of debt service with other county resources as well as payments from the City of Cleveland.The county resources include its occupancy tax and arena events tax. The Cleveland Cavaliers have agreed to cover the shortfall on theSeries 2017 B and C bonds if county and city resources fall short of projections.

Sales taxes grew at a robust pace of between 4% and 6% annually since 2010. The county projects receipts will decline by 2% in fiscal2017 and projects that growth will be slower than typical at 2% in fiscal 2018 due to a change in state law that prevents the countyfrom continuing to collect sales taxes from Medicaid-oriented managed care organizations (MCOs). Sales taxes generally grew over thepast twenty years despite a few declines during economic downturns. In 2009, sales taxes fell a substantial 10.4%.

Exhibit 2

3.2%

4.8%5.3%

4.7%

6.3%

-1.6%

0.3%

-0.8%

5.3%

2.2%

-0.2%

1.8%

1.1%

-10.4%

5.6%6.1%

4.7% 4.6%

4.0%4.4%

5.7%

-2.2%

-12%

-10%

-8%

-6%

-4%

-2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

$0

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300

Mill

ions

Annual rate of growth Continuing 1% Collections (1.25% post-2007)

Source: Cuyahoga County audited financial statements, continuing disclosures and official statements

Sales taxes covered debt service nearly 150x in fiscal 2016 because debt service had not yet fully ramped up on the county's initial salestax bond offerings. Based on 2016 collections, coverage would fall to 38x in 2017, 16x in 2018 and then steadily thereafter to 10x by2027. The 1% continuing sales tax alone provides ample post-sale maximum annual debt service (MADs) coverage of 8.2x. Includingthe full 1.25% sales tax, post-sale MADs coverage is 10.2x. Coverage may fall moderately as the county intends to issue $20 millionin sales tax revenue bonds within the next year to finance facility projects. The county anticipates that issuance will be paid for withoperational improvements and asset sales.

LIQUIDITYThe county's liquidity is healthy with a net operating fund cash position of $373 million, or 34.1% of revenue at the close of fiscal 2016.The general fund had $223 million, or a solid 29.1% of revenues.

3 25 September 2017 Cuyahoga County, OH : New Issue - Moody's Assigns Aa2 to Cuyahoga County, OH's Sales Tax Revenue Bonds

Page 4: CLIENT SERVICES Cuyahoga County, OH€¦ · Alexandra S. Parker 212-553-4889 MD-Public Finance alexandra.parker@moodys.com Matthew Butler 312-706-9970 VP-Senior Analyst matthew.butler@moodys.com

MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE

Debt and Legal Covenants: Flow of funds provides for direct payment to trustee though falls short of complete legaldivergenceThe sales tax bonds have a strong flow of funds with favorable bondholder protections, although we do not believe it providescomplete legal segregation from the county's general financial operations. Per the sales tax bond trust indenture, the county covenantsto direct the state Tax Commissioner, or another appropriate state official, to transfer the county's locally generated sales taxes directlyto the trustee for deposit in a designated bond retirement fund. The trustee, Huntington National Bank (Aa3), is required to depositone-fourth of the next interest payment and one-tenth of the next principal payment to the bond retirement fund. Excess monthlysales taxes are then transferred to the county for general operating purposes.

We cap special tax ratings at an issuer's general obligation rating in most cases. To achieve a higher rating, the revenue stream mustbe sufficiently legally separated from the local government’s credit, which is most often achieved through state level legislation thatcreates a special purpose entity to which the local unit has irrevocably assigned the rights to pledged revenue. While Cuyahoga Countyhas pledged to direct the state Tax Commissioner to redirect funds, the county has not given up its right and interest in its sales tax.Thus, we cap the sales tax bonds at the county’s rating.

The additional bonds test (ABT) is strong. It requires that, on average, the most recent 24 months of collections from the county's 1%permanent sales tax provide 3.0x coverage of maximum annual debt service on existing and proposed bonds. There is no debt servicereserve requirement.

DEBT STRUCTUREAll of the county's debt is fixed rate. Sales tax revenue debt principal is amortized over 20 years.

DEBT-RELATED DERIVATIVESThe county is not a party to any derivative agreements.

PENSIONS AND OPEBCounty employees are predominantly members of the Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS), though a very small shareparticipates in the State Teachers Retirement System. In 2012, the state legislature adopted benefit reforms for all Ohio cost-sharingplans that highlighted the state's flexible legal framework surrounding public pension benefits. Ohio statute establishes a 30-yeartarget for amortizing unfunded liabilities of all statewide cost-sharing plans. If plan actuaries determine current contribution ratesand actuarial assumptions result in an amortization period exceeding 30 years, the pension fund must submit a plan for adjustingcontributions or benefits to meet the 30-year requirement. The 2012 reforms amended annual cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) forretirees, resulting in a considerable decline in reported unfunded liabilities in 2013.

Notwithstanding the positive impact of the 2012 reforms, unfunded liabilities of OPERS remain high. The Moody's ANPL of the plangrew 14% from 2015 to 2016. Further, fiscal 2016 statewide employer contributions to the plan fell below the amount necessary toforestall growth in reported net pension liabilities assuming other plan assumptions hold, that is, tread water.1 Ohio statutes establishlocal government retirement plan contributions as a share of annual payroll and in fiscal 2016 the statewide contribution to OPERSwas 89% of the amount needed to tread water, indicating unfunded pension liabilities, on both a reported and Moody's-adjusted basis,could grow. Still, we do not perceive a material near-term increase in the credit challenge posed to Cuyahoga County from unfundedpensions.

Management and Governance: Moderate institutional framework scoreOhio counties have an Institutional Framework score of A, which is moderate compared to the nation. Institutional Framework scoresmeasure a sector's legal ability to increase revenues and decrease expenditures. The sector's major revenue source, sales tax, is subjectto a cap of 1.5% which can be overriden with voter approval only. However, many counties maintain headroom under the local cap.Revenues and expenditures tend to be predictable. Ohio has public sector unions, which can limit the ability to cut expenditures.

The Cuyahoga County council has the authority to extend the 0.25% portion of the sales tax rate that is set to expire in 2027. Councilcould also impose another 0.25% without voter approval bringing the general sales tax rate to a total 1.5%, though any increase wouldbe subject to repeal by voter referendum.

4 25 September 2017 Cuyahoga County, OH : New Issue - Moody's Assigns Aa2 to Cuyahoga County, OH's Sales Tax Revenue Bonds

Page 5: CLIENT SERVICES Cuyahoga County, OH€¦ · Alexandra S. Parker 212-553-4889 MD-Public Finance alexandra.parker@moodys.com Matthew Butler 312-706-9970 VP-Senior Analyst matthew.butler@moodys.com

MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE

Legal SecurityThe current issuances and the county's outstanding sales tax revenue bonds are secured by a senior lien on revenue collected pursuantto the county's current 1.25% sales tax. Although secured by the city's sales taxes, debt service on the 2017 bonds is expected topaid with other county resources (1.5% hotel tax and arena event tax receipts), city resources (arena event admissions tax) and rentpayments from the Cleveland Cavaliers.

Use of ProceedsThe Series 2017A, B and C bonds will finance the costs of improvements to Quicken Loan Arena.

Obligor ProfileCuyahoga County is one the two largest counties in Ohio with a population of 1.3 million as of the 2010 Census. Approximately 30%of the county's population resides within the City of Cleveland, the county seat. County operations include economic development,health and human services, public safety and general governmental functions.

MethodologyThe principal methodology used in this rating was US Public Finance Special Tax Methodology published in July 2017. Please see theRating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.

Ratings

Exhibit 3

Cuyahoga (County of) OHIssue RatingSales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2017B (QuickenLoans Arena Project) (Federally Taxable)

Aa2

Rating Type Underlying LTSale Amount $35,995,000Expected Sale Date 10/04/2017Rating Description Special Tax: Sales

Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2017C (QuickenLoans Arena Project) (Federally Taxable)

Aa2

Rating Type Underlying LTSale Amount $70,530,000Expected Sale Date 10/04/2017Rating Description Special Tax: Sales

Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2017A (QuickenLoans Arena Project) (Tax Exempt)

Aa2

Rating Type Underlying LTSale Amount $35,270,000Expected Sale Date 10/04/2017Rating Description Special Tax: Sales

Source: Moody's Investors Service

Endnotes1 Our “tread water” indicator measures the annual government contribution required to prevent reported net pension liabilities from growing, given the

entity's actuarial assumptions. An annual government contribution that treads water equals the sum of employer service cost and interest on the reportednet pension liability at the start of the fiscal year. A pension plan that receives an employer contribution equal to the tread water indicator will end theyear with an unchanged net pension liability relative to the beginning of the year if all plan assumptions hold. Net liabilities may decrease or increasein a given year due to factors other than the contribution amount, such as investment performance that exceeds or falls short of a plan's assumed rateof return. Still, higher contributions will always reduce unfunded liabilities faster, or will allow unfunded liabilities to grow more slowly than lowercontributions.

5 25 September 2017 Cuyahoga County, OH : New Issue - Moody's Assigns Aa2 to Cuyahoga County, OH's Sales Tax Revenue Bonds

Page 6: CLIENT SERVICES Cuyahoga County, OH€¦ · Alexandra S. Parker 212-553-4889 MD-Public Finance alexandra.parker@moodys.com Matthew Butler 312-706-9970 VP-Senior Analyst matthew.butler@moodys.com

MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE

© 2017 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDITRISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THERELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITYMAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGSDO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’SOPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVEMODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’SPUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOTPROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THESUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATIONAND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FORPURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FORRETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACTYOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW,AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTEDOR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANYPERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as wellas other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information ituses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However,MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for anyindirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use anysuch information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses ordamages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of aparticular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatorylosses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for theavoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents,representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCHRATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (includingcorporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating,agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintainpolicies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO andrated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually atwww.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”

Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s InvestorsService Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intendedto be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, yourepresent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly orindirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion asto the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be recklessand inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY’S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or otherprofessional adviser.

Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’sOverseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a NationallyRecognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by anentity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registeredwith the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.

MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferredstock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it feesranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000.

MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.

REPORT NUMBER 1091747

6 25 September 2017 Cuyahoga County, OH : New Issue - Moody's Assigns Aa2 to Cuyahoga County, OH's Sales Tax Revenue Bonds

Page 7: CLIENT SERVICES Cuyahoga County, OH€¦ · Alexandra S. Parker 212-553-4889 MD-Public Finance alexandra.parker@moodys.com Matthew Butler 312-706-9970 VP-Senior Analyst matthew.butler@moodys.com

MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE

CLIENT SERVICES

Americas 1-212-553-1653

Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077

Japan 81-3-5408-4100

EMEA 44-20-7772-5454

7 25 September 2017 Cuyahoga County, OH : New Issue - Moody's Assigns Aa2 to Cuyahoga County, OH's Sales Tax Revenue Bonds