CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLE Green and Sustainable … CCLR... · 2019. 12. 21. · Brief...
Transcript of CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLE Green and Sustainable … CCLR... · 2019. 12. 21. · Brief...
ROUX ASSOCIATES, INC.Environmental Consulting
& Management
CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLE
June 7, 2017
Green and Sustainable Remediation
Presented by:
Amanda Ludlow, Principal Scientist
Roux Associates, Inc.
Green and Sustainable Remediation
Definitions
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
“The practice of considering all environmental effects of remedy implementation and incorporating options to maximize net environmental benefit of cleanup actions.”
Interstate Technology Regulatory Council (ITRC)
“The site-specific employment of products, processes, technologies, and procedures that mitigate contaminant risk to receptors while making decisions that are cognizant of balancing community goals, economic impacts, and net environmental effects.
New York State
“The practice of considering all environmental effects of remedy implementation and incorporating options to minimize the environmental footprint of cleanup actions.”
Why GSR?
Improved stakeholder engagement
Community benefits
Educational opportunities
Collaboration
Simplified, reproducible results
Quantify desired metrics
Reduced impacts
Emissions / greenhouse gases
Energy/Water/Waste
Ecosystems
Sustainable Remediation
Brief History
2006 – Sustainable Remediation Forum (SURF) formed; SURF formally integrates sustainable principles, practices, and metrics into remediation projects and works to foster GSR on a national and international basis
2007 – Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials (ASTSWMO) creates Green Cleanups Task Force which advocates for what are referred to as “greener cleanups”
2008 – EPA develops The Green Remediation Technical Primer and forms the EPA/State Greener Cleanup Working Groups
2010 – NYSDEC issues DER-31 which establishes a preference for remediating sites in the most sustainable manner while still meeting all legal, regulatory and program requirements
2011 – Interstate Technology Regulatory Council (ITRC) publishes Green and Sustainable Remediation Technology Overview (GSR-1) and GSR Technical/Regulatory Guidance (GSR-2)
2013 – American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) publishes two standard guides: Greener Cleanups (E2893), Integrating Sustainable Objectives into Cleanup (E2876), Best Management Table in Excel format
GSR
Environmental
SocialEconomic
Sustainability
Core Elements
Energy
Air
WaterLand &
Ecosystems
Material & Waste
Minimize energy use
Increase renewable energy
Minimize emissions
Minimize water use
Preserve water quality
Conserve material resources
Minimize waste
Protect land and ecosystem services
GSR Planning
Investigation
Remedy Selection
Remedial Design
Construction
O&M
Closure
Level 3
BMPs + Advanced Evaluation
Level 2
BMPs + Simple Evaluation
Level 1
Best Management Practices
Incr
easing
Tool C
om
ple
xity
and
Data
Needs
EPA•Green Remediation BMP Fact Sheets (13)
•Sustainability Concepts in Decision-Making
ASTM
•Standard Guide for Integrating Sustainable Objectives into Cleanup
•Standard Guide for Greener Cleanups
ITRC•Green and Sustainable Remediation: A Practical Framework
SuRF•Framework for Integrating Sustainability into Remediation Projects
BMPs
Best Management Practices (BMPs)
Project Planning
Sampling & Analysis
Site Preparation & Restoration
Water Quality
Residual Management
Materials
Vehicles and Equipment
Power and Fuel
Buildings
GSR Tools – Level 1
EPA fact sheets
Introduction to BMPs
Site investigation
Excavation
Pump and treat
Bioremediation
SVE & Air Sparging
Clean fuel and emission
technologies
Renewable energy
BMP Examples
Minimize
impacts to
natural
resources
Engage
stakeholders
Identify
recycling/
reuse options
Maximize
renewable
energy use
Use local
labor and
resources
Reuse
unimpacted
soil
GSR Tools – Level 2
California Department of Toxic Substances Control
Green Remediation Evaluation Matrix (GREM)
Metrics Option 1 - SVE Option 2 - MNA Relative
ImportanceYes/No Score* Yes/No Score*
Air emissions Yes 2 Yes 1 1
Solid waste Yes 2 Yes 1 1
Wastewater Yes 1 Yes 1 1
Noise/odor/vibration Yes 3 Yes 1 1
Land stagnation Yes 1 Yes 3 2
TOTAL 9 7
WEIGHTED TOTAL 10 10
http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/omf/grn_remediation.cfm
*Scale of 1 to 3 where 1 is favorable (more green or sustainable) in this example
GSR Tools – Level 3
Carbon footprint calculators
Remedy footprint tools
Air Force Sustainable Remediation
Tool (SRTTM)
Navy and Army Corps of Engineers SiteWiseTM
Other tools
Net environmental benefits analysis tools
Life-cycle assessment (LCA) tools
SiteWiseTM
EmissionsWater
ConsumptionEnergy Used
ModelMaterial Production
Transportation
Equipment Use
Residual Handling
Resource Consumption
SiteWiseTM
Input Sheets
Materials Production
Well Construction
Treatment Chemical
Treatment Media
Construction Materials
Well Decommissioning
Silt Curtains
Bulk Materials
MATERIAL PRODUCTION
WELL MATERIALS Well Type 1
Input number of wells
Input depth of wells (ft)
Choose specific casing material schedule from drop down menu Sch 40 PVC
Choose well diameter (in) from drop down menu 1/8
Input total quantity of Sand (kg)
Input total quantity of Gravel (kg)
Input total quantity of Bentonite (kg)
Input total quantity of Typical Cement (kg)
Input total quantity of General Concrete (kg)
Input total quantity of Steel (kg)
TREATMENT CHEMICALS & MATERIALS Treatment 1
Input number of injection points
Choose material type from drop down menu Hydrogen Peroxide
Input amount of material injected at each point (pounds dry mass)
Input number of injections per injection point
TREATMENT MEDIA Treatment 1
Input weight of media used (lbs)
Choose media type from drop down menu Virgin GAC
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS Material 1
Choose material type from drop down menu HDPE Liner
Input area of material (ft2)
Input depth of material (ft)
WELL DECOMMISSIONING Well Type 1
Input number of wells
Input depth of wells (ft)
Input well diameter (in)
Choose material from drop down menu Soil
SILT CURTAIN MATERIALS Curtain 1
Input length or perimeter of silt curtain (ft)
Input depth of silt curtain (ft)
BULK MATERIAL QUANTITIES Material 1
Choose material from drop down menu Acetic Acid
Choose units of material quantity from drop down menu pounds
Input material quantity
www.navfac.navy.mil/navfac_worldwide/sp
ecialty_centers/exwc/products_and_services
/ev/erb/gsr.html
Interpretation – Overall Results
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
1,000.00
10,000.00
100,000.00
1,000,000.00
10,000,000.00
MMBTU MWH gallons metric ton metric ton metric ton metric ton metric ton metric ton metric ton
Total EnergyUsed
ElectricityUsage
WaterConsumption
GHGEmissions
Onsite NOxEmissions
Onsite SOxEmissions
OnsitePM10
Emissions
Total NOxEmissions
Total SOxEmissions
Total PM10Emissions
Excavation Hot Spot Excavation & Capping
Interpretation – Details
Phase Activities
Total
Energy
Used
Electricity
Usage
Water
Consumpt
ion
GHG
Emissions
Onsite
NOx
Emissions
Onsite
SOx
Emissions
Onsite
PM10
Emissions
Total NOx
Emissions
Total SOx
Emissions
Total
PM10
Emissions
MMBTU MWH gallons metric ton metric ton metric ton metric ton metric ton metric ton metric ton
Excavation
Consumables 121,878.74 NA NA 5,364.03 NA NA NA 18.90 26.69 8.27 NA NA
Transportation-Personnel 239.66 NA NA 19.03 NA NA NA 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06
Transportation-Equipment 5.45 NA NA 0.42 NA NA NA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Equipment Use and Misc 2,572.60 1.23 4,500,826 166.97 0.45 0.11 0.03 0.96 0.48 0.08 0.00 1.21
Residual Handling 51,475.74 NA NA 3,037.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.73 5.56 29.59 0.00 0.34
176,172.19 1.23 4,500,826 8,588.41 0.45 0.11 0.03 30.60 32.73 37.94 0.01 1.60
Consumables 0.00 NA NA 0.00 NA NA NA 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00
Transportation-Personnel 0.00 NA NA 0.00 NA NA NA 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00
Transportation-Equipment 0.00 NA NA 0.00 NA NA NA 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00
Equipment Use and Misc 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00
Residual Handling 0.00 NA NA 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
176,172.19 1.23 4,500,826 8,588.41 0.45 0.11 0.03 30.60 32.73 37.94 0.01 1.60
Hot Spot Excavation & Capping
Consumables 2,814.36 NA NA 122.21 NA NA NA 0.26 0.49 0.11 0.00 0.00
Transportation-Personnel 15.33 NA NA 1.20 NA NA NA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Transportation-Equipment 5.44 NA NA 0.42 NA NA NA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Equipment Use and Misc 703.62 0.09 81,641.64 52.26 0.13 0.02 0.01 0.31 0.16 0.03 0.00 0.48
Residual Handling 746.25 NA NA 45.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.08 0.41 0.00 0.01
4,285.00 0.09 81,641.64 221.33 0.13 0.02 0.01 0.73 0.73 0.55 0.00 0.49
Consumables 6,818.19 NA NA 413.45 NA NA NA 0.96 1.70 0.40 NA NA
Transportation-Personnel 13.42 NA NA 1.06 NA NA NA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Transportation-Equipment 0.00 NA NA 0.00 NA NA NA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Equipment Use and Misc 864.89 0.00 0.00 64.24 0.16 0.03 0.01 0.39 0.20 0.03 0.00 0.02
Residual Handling 850.49 NA NA 57.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.05 0.26 0.00 0.01
8,546.99 0.00 0.00 536.55 0.16 0.03 0.01 1.46 1.95 0.69 0.00 0.04
12,832.00 0.09 81,641.64 757.88 0.30 0.06 0.02 2.18 2.67 1.24 0.00 0.52
Long Term Total
Construc
tion
Short Term Total
O&M
O&M Total
Long Term Total
Accident
Risk
Fatality
Accident
Risk Injury
Construc
tion
Short Term Total
O&M
O&M Total
Evaluate BMPs to further reduce footprint
Power and Fuel
Use biodiesel produced from waste or cellulose-based products to power equipment
Use on‐site generated renewable energy to fully or partially provide power
Vehicle and Equipment
Implement an idle reduction plan
Use biodegradable hydraulic fluids on hydraulic equipment
Use electric, hybrid, ethanol, or compressed natural gas vehicles instead of conventional vehicles
Site Preparation and Land Restoration
Reuse on-site or local clean materials (e.g., crushed concrete)
Use reclaimed asphalt pavement as a granular base for new roads
Project Planning and Team Management
Choose equipment and product vendors with production and distribution centers near the site to minimize fuel consumption associated with delivery
Select local waste disposal and recycling facilities to minimize transportation impacts
Use a local laboratory to minimize transportation impacts
Use local staff (including subcontractors) when possible to minimize transportation impacts
Residual Solid and Liquid Waste
Reuse or recycle recovered product (such as resale of captured petroleum products, precipitated metals) and materials (for example, cardboard, plastics, asphalt, concrete)
Wrap Up
Investigation
Remedy Selection
Remedial Design
Construction
O&M
Closure
Level 3
BMPs + Advanced Evaluation
Level 2
BMPs + Simple Evaluation
Level 1
Best Management Practices
Incr
easing
Tool C
om
ple
xity
and
Data
Needs