Clear and present danger (test)

94
Clear and present danger (test)

description

Clear and present danger (test). A legal interpretation that reconciled two views of the First Amendment right of free speech, the first that Congress could not pass any law to restrict speech and the second that it could punish harms caused by speech. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Clear and present danger (test)

Page 1: Clear and present danger (test)

• Clear and present danger (test)

Page 2: Clear and present danger (test)

• A legal interpretation that reconciled two views of the First Amendment right of free speech, the first that Congress could not pass any law to restrict speech and the second that it could punish harms caused by speech.

• Proposed by Supreme Court justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in 1919, it held that Congress could punish only speech that created a clear and present danger of bringing of bringing about the actions that congress is authorized to prevent.

Page 3: Clear and present danger (test)

• Communist Control Act (of 1954)

Page 4: Clear and present danger (test)

• Declare the Communist Party to be part of a conspiracy to overthrow the government

• United States federal legislation, signed into law by Dwight Eisenhower on 24 August 1954, which outlawed the Communist Party of the United States. It amended the Subversive Activities Control Act, and prohibited communist from running for public office.

Page 5: Clear and present danger (test)

• Due process clause of the fourteenth amendment

Page 6: Clear and present danger (test)

• Protection against arbitrary derivation of life, liberty, or property as guaranteed in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments

Page 7: Clear and present danger (test)

• Espionage Act and Sedition Act (1917-1918)

Page 8: Clear and present danger (test)

• Makes it a crime to utter false statements that would interfere with the American military, to send through the mails material “advocating or urging treason, insurrection, or forcible resistance to any law of the United States”, or to utter or write any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language intended to incite resistance to United States or to curtail war production

Page 9: Clear and present danger (test)

• Establishment clause

Page 10: Clear and present danger (test)

• A clause in the First Amendment to the Constitution that Congress shall make no law “ respecting an establishment of religion”

Page 11: Clear and present danger (test)

• Exclusionary rule

Page 12: Clear and present danger (test)

• A rule that holds that evidence gathered in violation of the Constitution cannot be used in trial.

• The right has been implemented in two provisions of the Bill of Rights – the right to be free from unreasonable searches or seizures (Fourth Amendment) and the right not to be compelled to give evidence against oneself (Fifth Amendment).

Page 13: Clear and present danger (test)

• Freedom of expression

Page 14: Clear and present danger (test)

• The constitutional rights of Americans to “freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” as outlined in the First Amendment to the Constitution

Page 15: Clear and present danger (test)

• Freedom of religion

Page 16: Clear and present danger (test)

• The religious rights of Americans outlined in the First Amendment to the Constitution

• The amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion; or abridging free exercise thereof”

Page 17: Clear and present danger (test)

• Free exercise clause

Page 18: Clear and present danger (test)

• A clause in the First Amendment to the Constitution stating that Congress shall make no law prohibiting the “free exercise” of religion

Page 19: Clear and present danger (test)

• Good faith exception

Page 20: Clear and present danger (test)

• Admission at a trial of evidence that is gathered in violation of the Constitution if the violations results fro a technical or minor error

Page 21: Clear and present danger (test)

• Hate crime

Page 22: Clear and present danger (test)

• crimes (such as violent crime, hate speech or vandalism) that are motivated by feelings of hostility against any identifiable group of people within a society

• The U.S. Congress defined in 1992 a hate crime as a crime in which "the defendant's conduct was motivated by hatred, bias, or prejudice, based on the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation or gender identity of another individual or group of individuals"

Page 23: Clear and present danger (test)

• Internal security act (of 1950)

Page 24: Clear and present danger (test)

• Requires members of the Communist Party to register with the government

• established the Subversive Activities Control Board to investigate persons thought to be engaged in "un-American" activities

• Legislation that severely curtailed the rights of known or suspected communists

Page 25: Clear and present danger (test)

• Libel

Page 26: Clear and present danger (test)

• A written statement falsely injures the reputation of another person

Page 27: Clear and present danger (test)

• McCarthyism

Page 28: Clear and present danger (test)

• Charges that unfairly or dishonestly tarnish the motives, attack the patriotism, or violate the rights of individuals, especially of political opponents

• Refers to the numerous unsubstantiated accusations of communism made against public and private individuals by Senator Joseph McCarthy in the 1950s

Page 29: Clear and present danger (test)

• Obscenity

Page 30: Clear and present danger (test)

• expressions (words, images, actions) that offend the prevalent sexual morality of the time

Page 31: Clear and present danger (test)

• Prior restraint

Page 32: Clear and present danger (test)

• the traditional view of the press’s free speech rights as expressed by William Blackstone, the great English Jurist

• According to this view the press is guaranteed freedom from censorship – that is, rules telling it in advance what it can publish

Page 33: Clear and present danger (test)

• Probable cause

Page 34: Clear and present danger (test)

• Good reason that suggests a crime has been committed

• Standard by which a police officer may make an arrest, conduct a personal or property search or obtain a warrant

• Also standard to which a grand jury believes that a crime has been committed

Page 35: Clear and present danger (test)

• Public figure

Page 36: Clear and present danger (test)

• IE celebrity, elected official, army general, etc

• A public figure cannot base a lawsuit on incorrect harmful statements unless there is proof that the writer or publisher intentionally defamed the person with malice

Page 37: Clear and present danger (test)

• Search warrant

Page 38: Clear and present danger (test)

• An order from a judge authorizing the search of a place; the order must describe what is to be searched and seized, and the judge can issue it only if he or she is persuaded by the police that probable cause exists that a crime has been committed and that the evidence bearing on the crime will be found at a certain location

Page 39: Clear and present danger (test)

• Sedition Act (of 1918)

Page 40: Clear and present danger (test)

• An amendment to the Espionage Act of 1917• The Sedition Act forbade an American to use

"disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language" about the United States government, flag, or armed forces during war

• The act also allowed the Postmaster General to deny mail delivery to dissenters of government policy during wartime

Page 41: Clear and present danger (test)

• Smith Act (of 1940)

Page 42: Clear and present danger (test)

• Made it illegal to advocate the overthrow of United States government by force or violence

Page 43: Clear and present danger (test)

• Symbolic speech

Page 44: Clear and present danger (test)

• An act that conveys a political message, such as burning a draft card to protest the draft

Page 45: Clear and present danger (test)

• Wall of separation principle

Page 46: Clear and present danger (test)

• A Supreme Court interpretation of the establishment clause in the First Amendment that prevents government involvement with religion, even on a non-preferential basis

Page 47: Clear and present danger (test)

• Affirmative action

Page 48: Clear and present danger (test)

• The requirement, imposed by law or administrative regulation, that an organization take positive steps to increase the umber or proportion of women, blacks or other minorities in its membership

Page 49: Clear and present danger (test)

• Alien

Page 50: Clear and present danger (test)

• a person who is neither a native nor a citizen of their country of residence

Page 51: Clear and present danger (test)

• Brown v. Board of Education

Page 52: Clear and present danger (test)

• Linda Brown’s parents/NAACP sued the board of education because she was not allowed to attend an all white school that was in he neighborhood than a all black school

• The Supreme Court ruled unanimously that separate but equal was unconstitutional

• Overruled Plessy v Ferguson

Page 53: Clear and present danger (test)

• Civil rights act of 1964

Page 54: Clear and present danger (test)

• Legislation outlawing discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin

• Originally conceived to protect the rights of black men, the bill was amended prior to passage to protect the civil rights of all men and women

Page 55: Clear and present danger (test)

• Compensatory action

Page 56: Clear and present danger (test)

• An action designed to help members of disadvantaged groups, especially minorities and women, catch up, usually by giving them extra education, training or services

Page 57: Clear and present danger (test)

• De factor segregation

Page 58: Clear and present danger (test)

• Racial segregation in schools that occur not because of laws or administration decisions, but as a result of patterns of residential settlement. To the extent that blacks and whites live in separate neighborhoods, neighborhood schools will often be segregated de facto.

Page 59: Clear and present danger (test)

• De jure segregation

Page 60: Clear and present danger (test)

• Racial segregation that occurs because of laws or administrative decisions by public agencies

Page 61: Clear and present danger (test)

• Equality of opportunity

Page 62: Clear and present danger (test)

• A view that it is wrong to use race or sex either to discriminate against or give preference treatment to minorities or women

Page 63: Clear and present danger (test)

• Equality of results

Page 64: Clear and present danger (test)

• A view that the burdens of racism and sexism can be overcome only by taking race or sex into account in designing remedies

Page 65: Clear and present danger (test)

• Fourteenth amendment

Page 66: Clear and present danger (test)

• Ex-slaves made citizens• Due process clause applied to states• Equal protection• Reduces congressional representation for

states denying adult males the right to vote

• Southern rebels denied federal office• Rebel debts repudiated

Page 67: Clear and present danger (test)

• Hyde amendment

Page 68: Clear and present danger (test)

• Bar federal funds to pay for abortions excepts when the life of the mother is at stake

Page 69: Clear and present danger (test)

• Jim Crow

Page 70: Clear and present danger (test)

• A slang expression for African Americans that emerged in the 1820s and came to signify the laws and governmental practices designed to segregate blacks from whites, especially in the American south

Page 71: Clear and present danger (test)

• National association for the advancement of colored people (NAACP)

Page 72: Clear and present danger (test)

• National group that wants to ensure the political, educational, social and economic equality of rights of all persons and to eliminate racial hatred and racial discrimination

Page 73: Clear and present danger (test)

• Nonviolent civil disobedience

Page 74: Clear and present danger (test)

• A philosophy of opposing a law one considers unjust by peacefully violating it and allowing oneself to be punished as a result

Page 75: Clear and present danger (test)

• Plessy v. Ferguson

Page 76: Clear and present danger (test)

• Plessy who was 1/8 black refused to ride in a separate train car from the whites. He was arrested on that basis. He claimed that the arrest violated his fourteenth amendment rights. The courts ruled against him claiming that separate but equal was constitutional.

Page 77: Clear and present danger (test)

• Preferential treatment

Page 78: Clear and present danger (test)

• Giving minorities preference in hiring, promotions, college admissions, and contracts

Page 79: Clear and present danger (test)

• Reverse discrimination

Page 80: Clear and present danger (test)

• Using race or sex to give preferential treatment to some people

Page 81: Clear and present danger (test)

• Roe v. Wade

Page 82: Clear and present danger (test)

• In some states abortion was legal, others it wasn’t. texas, particularly, abortion was legal. The lady under the pseudonym of Roe couldn’t afford to travel to another state for the abortion. She claimed the fourteenth amendment. In a 7 to 2 vote, the court rule in her favor claiming that the fourteenth amendment gives the right to privacy.

Page 83: Clear and present danger (test)

• Rostker v. Goldberg

Page 84: Clear and present danger (test)

• A case where the court held that men and not women are required to register for the draft without violating the due process clause of the fifth amendment

Page 85: Clear and present danger (test)

• Separate but equal doctrine

Page 86: Clear and present danger (test)

• The doctrine establishes in Plessy v. Ferguson, in which the Supreme Court ruled that a state could provide separate but equal facilities for African Americansm

Page 87: Clear and present danger (test)

• Strict scrutiny

Page 88: Clear and present danger (test)

• The standard by which the Supreme Court judges classifications based on race. To be accepted such a classification must be closely related to a compelling public purpose

Page 89: Clear and present danger (test)

• Suspect classifications

Page 90: Clear and present danger (test)

• Classifications of people on the basis of their race and ethnicity. The courts have ruled that laws classifying people on these grounds will be suspect to “strict scrutiny”

Page 91: Clear and present danger (test)

• Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg

Page 92: Clear and present danger (test)

• A case that set the guidelines for all subsequent cases involving school segregation

Page 93: Clear and present danger (test)

• White flight

Page 94: Clear and present danger (test)

• Mandatory busing or other integration measures that cause whites to move out of a city at a faster rate than they otherwise would