Cleaner Air 4 London's Communities LSx Annual conference
description
Transcript of Cleaner Air 4 London's Communities LSx Annual conference
Cleaner Air 4 London's Communities
LSx Annual conference
14th November 2013Redmond Centre, Manor House
“How can local
residents and volunteers
across London tackle air pollution?”
Aims of event
The aim of LSx’s Annual Conference was to:
• Bring together stakeholders across London to increase understanding of and engagement with air quality issues amongst communities
• Facilitate shared learning, expertise and create new partnerships
• Showcase success stories of community work around air quality, regeneration and environmental inequality
• Share barriers, opportunities and top tips to influence policy and planning
• Identify critical next steps between business, the public sector and voluntary groups to accelerate change.
Event Agenda
Registration and Lunch
Introduction and objectives
Why are we here?
Samantha Heath
Air Quality and Transport in London
Murad Qureshi
Solutions from freight transport
Chris Snelling
Workshops 1Citizen Science; power of citizen
led research
Sasha Pratt
Achieving behaviour
change through schools
Ben Hudson
Influencing Air Quality through
planning
Samantha Heath
Influencing Air Quality through
health & wellbeing
Jane Mulholland
Break and Technology Showcase
Workshops 2Citizen Science; power of citizen
led research
Sasha Pratt
Achieving behaviour
change through schools
Ben Hudson
Influencing Air Quality through
planning
Samantha Heath
Influencing Air Quality through
health & wellbeing
Jane Mulholland
SummaryReducing our exposure
to Air pollution
Ben Barrett
Feedback and next steps
Samantha Heath
Close
Keynote speakers
Murad Qureshi – Chair of London Assembly Environment Committee
• We need to measure and record our air quality
•The Ultra Low Emission Zone needs to be brought forward
•Transport infrastructure needs investment
Christopher Snelling Head of Urban Logistics – Freight Transport Association
•Investment is occurring public and private sector in technology and infrastructure
•Policy needs to apply to public and private sector alike
•Congested traffic cost business money – this needs to be addressed
Workshop 1 Influencing Air Quality through
planning
Aims of workshop
• To review how air quality can be influenced by the planning process
• To highlight that air quality is not currently considered sufficiently
• To Initiate a flow of ideas around how to increase the importance of air quality in planning
Outcomes of workshop
• Developers were inspired to Include air quality neutral and public liaison from an early planning stage, this new planning requirement has yet to be tested.
• Some local authorities have a range of requirements ( that could be shared) from developers – reduction of pollution in the construction stage and specific 106 requirements.
• The community interest levees (CIL) has yet to be deployed for air quality – this is an opportunity.
Workshop 1 Influencing Air Quality through
planning
Workshop 2 Influencing air quality through Health
& Well-Being Boards
Aims of workshop• To support London’s
communities better understand the health impacts of air pollution and what actions can be taken to mitigate these effects.
• Look at how the health agenda can be influenced to incorporate air quality concerns and begin to tackle poor air quality
Workshop 2 Influencing air quality through Health
& Well-Being Boards
Outcomes of workshop
• There is a clear disconnect between the environmental and public health communities.
• High-level understanding linking air quality and public health, coupled with local authorities having environmental health remit presents us with a unique opportunity for increasing pressure on authorities at different levels for holistic planning
• Presenting well-documented, quantifiable evidence highlighting the costs of poor air quality for local councils is essential.
Aims of workshop
• To communicate LSx’s Cleaner Air 4 School (CA4S) work with primary schools and explore educational and community benefits of taking work out of the classroom with citizen science.
• Attendees invited to comment on, feedback and discuss implications of the project.
• How can we achieve behaviour change beyond the classroom and engage the wider public?
Workshop 3 Achieving behaviour change through
schools
Outcomes of workshop
• Community leaders were inspired to participate in citizen science ideas including lichen observation.
• Discussions took place about new approaches to reduce children’s exposure to air pollution during their journey to school.
• Power of young people – groups suggested there is a role for young people to play as advocates to engage politicians and the wider public directly.
• Create stronger links to health and wellbeing and demonstrate effects in context.
Workshop 3 Achieving behaviour change through
schools
Workshop 4 Citizen science: The power of citizen-
led research
Aims of Workshop
•To explore how citizen science techniques can help communities provide evidence to influence behaviour.
•Why do we want to change our exposure to poor air quality?
•What citizen science methods can be used to gather evidence?
•Whose behaviour do we want to influence?
•How can citizen science inspire behaviour change in a community?
Workshop 4 Citizen science: The power of citizen-
led research
Outcomes of workshop
• Community groups were inspired to learn more about air quality
• A number of community members are looking into the possibility of carrying out a air quality research project within their communities.
Technology Showcase
Aims of the Showcase•The Technology Showcase brought a number of innovative products to monitor, reduce impact on, or exposure to air quality.
•The showcase aimed to offer personal solutions to air quality challenges faced by Londoners and create connections between innovative embryonic products and the end users that need them
Testing the air quality route plannerExperiment to demonstrate how personal exposure to air quality
can be reduced through route planning
On the day of the conference Dr Ben Barrett and Andrew Grieve of King’s College London demonstrated the impact of taking a different route to reduce personal exposure to air pollution by wearing air monitors on two routes; travelling by tube and along Seven Sisters road, and travelling by rail and walking through Finsbury park.
It is clear that Ben was exposed to far greater concentrations of Black carbon than Andrew, highlighting the importance of route selection in minimising exposure. The full presentation can be found on the LSx website.
Next Steps
LSx asked conference attendees
what actions they would like to take
following the conference....
• 44% pledged to work with schools, businesses, and communities
• 29% pledged to support ultra/low emissions zones
• 31% pledged to campaign for retrofitting or upgrading buses and taxis
• 38% pledged to change their own behaviours to help improve air quality in their homes and local areas
Next Steps; policy actions
The causes of poor air quality are complex,
therefore responses to the challenge are not simple,
however as a result of this conference we know
that we need to:
• Ensure that policies across London apply equally to the public and private sector
• Seek to support well-documented, quantifiable evidence highlighting the costs of poor air quality for local councils - to present to H&W Boards*.
• Planning instruments such as Air Quality Neutral and CILs** are useful tools to invest in air quality reduction, but considerable work in developing tools for planners and community alike.
• Technology has a role to play to meet the challenge – TSB***, and the LEP**** could support development in this area.
*H&W Boards – Health & Well-Being Boards** CIL – Community Infrastructure Levy https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/6313/1897278.pdf *** TSB – Technology Strategy Board**** LEP - Local Enterprise Partnerships
Feedback from the event
Feedback from the event was positive and constructive:
• 73% rated the event as excellent or very good
• 54% rated their level of new learning as excellent or very good
• 80% rated their opportunity to network through the event as excellent or very good
Feedback from the event
• “[It was helpful] meeting people and learning about policies and case studies where air quality policies work.”
• “[It was helpful] meeting others, and there was a wide educational benefit for many who attended. Putting air quality higher up the agenda is very important.”
• “I enjoyed the factual presentations that provided new information and insight into the scope and nature of the [air quality] issue, e.g. the transport logistics speaker.”
• “[It was helpful learning] that there are many people across a range of disciplines who are also interested and working in this area.”
• “Congratulations. Excellent event in so many ways!”
Delegates
Age UK Goldsmiths College London Borough of Brent Putney SocietyAirQualityNews.com Greater London Authority London Borough of Camden RAC Foundation for
MotoringAround the Block Groundwork London London Borough of Croydon Soho Housing AssociationAyurved Consultancy Haringey Agenda 21/ other
organisationsLondon Borough of Greenwich
South West London Environment Network
Battersea Society Harrow Environmental Forum
London Borough of Hackney Sustainable Merton
Changing Minds Hayes Community Development Forum
London Borough of Havering Sustrans London
Citizen Sense Heathrow Airport Ltd London Borough of Hillingdon
The Environment Agency
Clean Air in London Hollyfield School London Borough of Hounslow
Transport for London
Close the Door Imperial College London Borough of Islington Trees For CitiesCross River Partnership In Mid Town London Borough of Merton UK LPGasDepartment for Transport Investec Bank Ltd London Borough of Newham University College LondonEmergent Research Invisible Dust London Borough of
Richmond upon ThamesVictoria Business Improvement District BID
Energy Saving Trust LEAP micro AD, WRAP project
London Borough of Southwark
Whittington Agenda 21 Group
Environmental Management Publishing Limited
Lend Lease London Voluntary Service Council LVSC
Esmee Fairbairn Foundation Lifeworld Manor House Development Trust
Future Energy Strategies Lightsource Renewable Energy Limited
No to Silvertown Tunnel
Global Action Plan UK Living Streets Positive Choice
Thank you to all our attendees!