Class 6 Copyright, Winter, 2010 Characters Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The...
-
Upload
blake-watts -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Class 6 Copyright, Winter, 2010 Characters Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The...
Class 6Copyright, Winter, 2010
Characters
Randal C. PickerLeffmann Professor of Commercial Law
The Law School
The University of Chicago
773.702.0864/[email protected] © 2005-10 Randal C. Picker. All Rights Reserved.
Characters and Derivative Works
Key Questions What are we doing when we focus on the
question of the copyrightability of characters?
What (incremental) work would that construct do relative to our derivative works rules?
April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-10 Randal C. Picker 2
Characters and Derivative Works
Are there uses of characters that we want to allow or block that we won’t achieve that result if we simply use our generic derivative works rules?
April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-10 Randal C. Picker 3
Start Here
www.fanfiction.net
April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-10 Randal C. Picker 4
April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-10 Randal C. Picker 5
Owning Characters
Nichols (2nd Cir. 1930) (Learned Hand) The Specificity Test
“It follows that the less developed the characters, the less they can be copyrighted; that is the penalty an author must bear for marking them too indistinctly.”
April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-10 Randal C. Picker 6
Hand’s Characters Malvolio
Protected but not a “vain and foppish steward who became amorous of his mistress”
Sparknotes on Malvolio “The straitlaced steward—or head servant—in the household
of Lady Olivia. Malvolio is very efficient but also very self-righteous, and he has a poor opinion of drinking, singing, and fun. His priggishness and haughty attitude earn him the enmity of Sir Toby, Sir Andrew, and Maria, who play a cruel trick on him, making him believe that Olivia is in love with him. In his fantasies about marrying his mistress, he reveals a powerful ambition to rise above his social class.”
April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-10 Randal C. Picker 7
Warner Brothers (9th Cir. 1954)
Core Facts Hammett authors The Maltese Falcon
(TMF) It is published in serial form by Pro-
Distributors Corporation (PDC) PDC copyrights TMF PDC assigns the copyright in TMF to Knopf
April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-10 Randal C. Picker 8
Warner Brothers
Hammett and Knopf enter into contract with Warner Bros.
Knopf does limited assignment of certain aspects of copyright to Warner Bros.
Warner sues CBS for copyright infringement when Hammett contracts with CBS regarding the use of the character Sam Spade
April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-10 Randal C. Picker 9
9th Circuit Analysis
Contract Characters not specifically referenced Authors routinely use characters again,
especially detective stories (Sherlock Holmes)
Interpret contract against sophisticated party like Warner Bros.
April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-10 Randal C. Picker 10
9th Circuit Analysis
Copyright “It is conceivable that the character really
constitutes the story being told, but if the character is only the chessman in the game of telling the story he is not within the area of the protection afforded by copyright.”
April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-10 Randal C. Picker 11
9th Circuit Analysis
“We conclude that even if the owners assigned their complete rights in the copyright to the Falcon, such assignment did not prevent the author from using the characters therein, in other stories. The characters were vehicles for the story told, and the vehicles did not go with the sale of the story.”
April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-10 Randal C. Picker 12
Framing This
Prior to 1976 Prior to Publication
Hammett has state law rights in The Maltese Falcon as story and whatever rights attached in characters, such as Sam Spade
After Publication PDC and then Knopf have copyright in TMF
April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-10 Randal C. Picker 13
Framing This
As to characters, 9th Circuit holds not copyrightable
This means Not that characters enter public domain, but
that characters remain outside of federal copyright and inside the state law system for protecting works
Hammett retains control over characters
April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-10 Randal C. Picker 14
Warner Bros. Now
After 1976 Copyright arises on fixation of TMF (and not
at separate point of publication) and in the characters at the same time, if those characters are copyrightable
April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-10 Randal C. Picker 15
Anderson v. Stallone
Core Facts Sly Stallone is Rocky: plays the character in
three movies, authors the script for each one
May 82: Discusses potential plot for Rocky IV in public
June 82: Anderson sees Rocky III, authors script for potential Rocky IV, using characters from movies
April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-10 Randal C. Picker 16
Anderson v. Stallone
Anderson has some sort of contact with people high up at MGM
Stallone makes Rocky IV Anderson sues for copyright infringement of
his script
April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-10 Randal C. Picker 17
103(a)’s Penalty Regime
(a) The subject matter of copyright as specified
by section 102 includes compilations and derivative works, but protection for a work employing preexisting material in which copyright subsists does not extend to any part of the work in which such material has been used unlawfully.
April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-10 Randal C. Picker 18
Key Questions
Does Stallone have a separately protectable interest in the Rocky character?
What lines separates the protectable from the unprotectable?
Is this different from our regime for famous trademarks?
April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-10 Randal C. Picker 19
Gaiman v. McFarlane: Text v. Pictures
360 F.3d 655 (7th Cir. 2004) Core Facts
McFarlane invites four writers to help create scripts for issue of Spawn
Not done as work made for hire Gaiman text creates three new “characters”
illustrated by McFarlane Are the characters copyrightable?
April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-10 Randal C. Picker 20
[Spawn]
April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-10 Randal C. Picker 21
Spawn No. 9
April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-10 Randal C. Picker 22
CountCogliostro
April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-10 Randal C. Picker 23
MedievalSpawn
April 21, 2023 Copyright © 2005-10 Randal C. Picker 24
The Test in McFarlane?
Says the Court “Although Gaiman’s verbal description of
Cogliostro may well have been of a stock character, once he was drawn and named and given speech he became sufficiently distinctive to be copyrightable.”
Text vs. Pictures? Note that this is a joint authorship case