CLARK COUNTY-SPRINGFIELD TRANSPORTATION … Meeting Agenda 091418.pdf · Scott Schmid,...

Scott Schmid, Transportation DirectorElmer Beard, Chair

Kathy Estep, Vice-Chair

Bob Bender Joyce Chilton Howard KitkoNancy Brown David Estrop William LindseyJohn Burr Richard Henry Lowell McGlothinLeann Castillo Matt Parrill

CLARK COUNTY-SPRINGFIELDTRANSPORTATION COORDINATING COMMITTEE

AGENDA

I. CALL TO ORDER

II. ROLL CALL

III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

IV. MINUTES (Attached) Action

V. FINANCIAL REPORTS (Attached)a. Budget Status and Cash on Hand Report (Attached) Actionb. Summary of Expenses (Attached) Actionc. Blanket Requests (Attached) Action

VI. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT (Attached)a. FY2018 Planning Work Program Completion Report

i. Resolution 2018-N (Attached) Action

VII. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING REPORT (Attached)a. FY2018 Annual Listing of Obligated Projects (Attached) Action

i. Resolution 2018-O (Attached) Actionb. Transportation Plan and TIP Conformity

i. Resolution 2018-T (Attached) Actionc. FY2018-2021 Transportation Improvement Program

i. Amendment Resolution 2018-P (Attached) Actiond. Transit Asset Management Performance Measures

i. Target Setting Resolution 2018-Q (Attached) Actionii. 2040 Transportation Plan

Amendment Resolution 2018-R (Attached) Actioniii. FY2018-2021 Transportation Improvement Program

Amendment Resolution 2018-S (Attached) Actione. FY2020-2023 Transportation Improvement Program

i. Development Update Discussionf. Other Discussion

VIII. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS (None)

IX. OLD BUSINESS (None)

X. NEW BUSINESS

XI. COMMUNICATIONS (None)

XII. ADJOURNMENT Action

Springview Government Center3130 East Main Street, Suite 2A

Springfield, Ohio 45505

937-521-2128 [email protected]

www.clarktcc.com

Transportation Coordinating CommitteeFriday, September 14, 2018

10:30 A.M.Springview Government Center

3130 East Main StreetRoom 151, 1st Floor

Clark County – Springfield August 10, 2018Transportation Coordinating Committee Clark State-Brinkman CenterAnnual Meeting 10:30 A.M.

1

M I N U T E S

The meeting was called to order by Chairman Elmer Beard.

Those Members Present: Nancy Brown, John Burr, Leann Castillo, Joyce Chilton, Kathy Estep, David Estrop, Richard Henry, Howard Kitko, William Lindsey, Lowell McGlothin, and Matt Parrill

Those Alternates Present: Daren Cotter, Bryan Heck, Chris Moore, Kevin Snyder, and Ben Wiltheiss

Those Others Present: Brett Bauer, Andrew Bremer, Jim Bodenmiller, Randy Bridge, Scott Boyer, Megan Burr, Michelle Caserta, Randy Chevalley, Lamar Daniel, Warren Davidson, John Detrick, Melanie Ellis, Craig Eley, Tom Franzen, Rich Granger, Shayne Gray, Dave Gulden, Bob Hackett, Krissy Hartman, Leonard Hartoog, Larry Himes, Horton Hobbs, Amanda Honeycutt, Andy Johns, Jim Kaupella, Jordan Keating, Carol Kennard, Carol Manda, Jeanne Mbagwu, Leslie McDermott, Mike McDorman, Lisa McDonough, Sarah McPherson, Allan Neimayer, John Paulsen, Nancy Pence, Kris Popovich, Michelle Porr, Kyle Reindel, Tiffany Ross, Rob Rue, Matt Sanctis, Kendra Schenk, Walt Szczesny, Ben Thaeler, Larry Wakefield, Scott Schmid, Louis Agresta, Glen Massie, Brian Mercer, and Melanie Runkel

Following roll call, Chairman Beard led the TCC in the Pledge of Allegiance.

WELCOMING REMARKS

Larry Wakefield, Vice-President of Business Affairs of Clark State Community College, thanked everyone for attending the meeting at the Clark State Brinkman Educational Center.

MINUTES

Motion by David Estrop, seconded by William Lindsey to approve the minutes from the July 13, 2018 meeting.Vote: Motion approved

FINANCIAL REPORTING

Budget Status & Cash on Hand ReportMotion by Richard Henry, seconded by Lowell McGlothin to approve the Budget Status & Cash on Hand Report for July 2018.Vote: Motion approved

Summary of ExpensesExpenditures for July were for the amount of $55,119.43. Motion to approve was made by Lowell McGlothin, seconded by Richard Henry.Vote: Motion approved

Clark County – Springfield August 10, 2018Transportation Coordinating Committee Clark State-Brinkman CenterAnnual Meeting 10:30 A.M.

2

GUEST SPEAKERS

Warren Davidson, US Congressman for Ohio’s 8th District, briefly spoke on infrastructure and challenges with funding.

Randy Chevalley, ODOT District 7 Deputy Director, introduced Andrew Bremer, Managing Director of Local Affairs with DriveOhio. Andrew, along with Rich Granger, Managing Director of Workforce Development with DriveOhio, gave a presentation on the DriveOhio program.Andrew discussed the relationship between and the development of new technology. Andrew also highlighted several current projects, including the US33 Smart Mobility Corridor and Connected Marysville. Rich discussed the workforce development component of DriveOhio and some of the types of programs involved. Rich also briefly discussed the self-driving shuttle that will be in downtown Columbus on the Scioto mile later this year.

PLANNING REPORT

TCC Annual NewsletterScott Schmid gave a brief overview of the TCC Annual Newsletter that was distributed at the meeting.

SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS

No updates to report

OLD BUSINESS


NEW BUSINESS


COMMUNICATIONS

No communications to report

ADJOURNMENT

A motion was made by Richard Henry, seconded by Nancy Brown to adjourn the meeting.Vote: Motion approved

Sincerely,

Elmer M. BeardChairman

September 2018 TCC Financial Report 1

MemorandumTo: Transportation Coordinating Committee

From: Scott Schmid Phone 937-521-2133Transportation Director [email protected]

Re: Financial Report

Date: September 7, 2018

The following are items for discussion and action during the September 14, 2018Transportation Coordinating Committee meeting.

Budget Status and Cash On Hand Report – August 2018The August 2018 Budget Status and Cash on Hand Report is included in the agenda packet. Staff will review the report at the September 14 meeting.

Staff requests discussion and approval of the report by voice vote.

Summary of Expenses – August 2018The August 2018 Summary of Expenses is included in the agenda packet. Staff will review the report at the September 14 meeting.

Staff requests discussion and approval of the report by voice vote.

Blanket RequestsThe Blanket Reserve Summary sheet is included in the agenda packet. Staff is requesting two new Blankets:

74140 Travel for $5,00074403 Contract-Project for $15,000

Staff requests discussion and approval of the Blankets by voice vote.

General Restricted TOTAL Beginning Balance 254,850.91$ -$ 254,850.91$

Total Expenses 49,125.84$

Total Receipts 65,594.57$

Ending Balance 271,319.74$ $0.00 271,319.74$

Percent Monthly YTDWork Elements Total Budget Balance Expended Expense Expenses

601.1 Short Range Planning 103,653.60$ 101,358.74$ 2% 344.30$ 2,294.86$ 601.11 Short Range Planning (fy18) 67,787.25$ 40,775.70$ 40% 12,592.73$ 27,011.55$ 601.2 General Planning Services 100,000.00$ 100,000.00$ 0% -$ 601.3 Access Management Guidelines 125,000.00$ 125,000.00$ 0% -$ 602.1 Trans. Improvement Program 28,081.75$ 22,306.75$ 21% 5,775.00$ 602.11 Trans. Improvement Program (fy18) 9,989.70$ 6,359.80$ 36% 2,218.97$ 3,629.90$ 605.1 Surveillance 82,813.00$ 65,999.84$ 20% 11,030.16$ 16,813.16$ 605.11 Surveillance (fy18) 26,163.50$ 20,485.40$ 22% 1,345.83$ 5,678.10$ 610.1 Long Range Planning 27,163.50$ 22,640.71$ 17% 1,017.07$ 4,522.79$ 625.1 RTPO Planning 98,392.67$ 98,205.38$ 0% 127.89$ 187.29$ 625.11 RTPO Planning (fy18) 44,827.00$ 39,444.12$ 12% 1,913.27$ 5,382.88$ 665.1 Air Quality Advocacy 40,000.00$ 37,459.78$ 6% 2,540.22$ 667.1 Rideshare 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 0% -$ 674.1 Coordinated Transportation 44,813.00$ 38,707.14$ 14% 4,329.36$ 6,105.86$ 674.2 FTA Transit Planning 74,000.00$ 68,121.37$ 8% 3,456.13$ 5,878.63$ 682.1 OPWC Infrastructure Support Program 65,000.00$ 60,275.11$ 7% 3,847.89$ 4,724.89$ 682.2 WESTCO Rail Freight Administration 90,000.00$ 81,719.28$ 9% 4,494.76$ 8,280.72$ 682.3 Clean Ohio Support Program 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 0% -$ 697.1 Public Involvement 26,649.50$ 14,957.71$ 44% 190.10$ 11,691.79$

1,084,334.47$ 973,816.83$ 10% 46,908.46$ 110,517.64$

TCC Chairman Date

as of August 31, 2018 CCSTCC - CASH on HAND & BUDGET Status Reports - FY19

Summary of ExpendituresArea Transportation Trust Fund

August 2018

CPG CPG FTA 5307 FTA 5307 CMAQ CMAQ CLEAN SPR SPR SPR

Description Paid By TCC Federal ODOT Federal Spfld Air Quality Rideshare OPWC WESTCO OHIO Federal ODOT LUC TOTAL

SALARIES

Transportation Study 07/30 - 08/12/18 # 03 4,853.35 3,910.14 488.77 564.93 70.62 0.00 0.00 795.18 1,014.54 0.00 377.41 47.18 47.18 12,169.30

Transportation Study 08/13 - 08/26/18 # 04 4,444.92 3,031.07 378.88 597.52 74.69 0.00 0.00 822.60 850.02 0.00 295.68 36.96 36.96 10,569.30

---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

9,298.27 6,941.21 867.65 1,162.45 145.31 0.00 0.00 1,617.78 1,864.56 0.00 673.09 84.14 84.14 22,738.60

OFFICE SUPPLIES

Dell printer toner cartridges 195913 199.47 199.47

Garrigans paper & misc. supplies 195914 136.61 136.61

BEC color copier toner 195917 236.00 236.00

OTHER EXPENSES

PERS Aug-18 4,803.07 4,803.07

Medicare Aug-18 482.07 482.07

Superior Dental Aug-18 91.10 91.10

Life Insurance Aug-18 19.20 19.20

UMR Health Ins. Aug-18 7,767.99 7,767.99

Miovision Tech. camera mount parts 195918 37.00 296.00 37.00 370.00

Holmes Printing print Connect Clark Co 195919 101.71 813.65 101.71 1,017.07

GIS Cartography print Clark Co. maps 196483 986.00 7,888.00 986.00 9,860.00

Glen Massie mileage reimbursement 197326 5.35 42.76 5.35 53.46

Louis Agresta mileage & parking 197328 24.44 @@ 195.52 24.44 50.28 294.68

Clark State meeting room rental 197329 130.00 130.00

Scott Schmid mileage reimbursement 197593 4.00 31.96 4.00 39.96

Melanie Runkel mileage reimbursement 197595 69.12 8.64 8.64 86.40

Miovision Tech. traffic data analysis 197600 80.02 640.12 80.02 800.16

Level 3 0.00 0.00

14,531.95 9,908.00 1,238.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.28 0.00 69.12 8.64 8.64 26,387.23

TOTAL AMOUNT SUBMITTED 24,066.22 16,849.21 2,106.17 1,162.45 145.31 0.00 0.00 1,617.78 1,914.84 0.00 742.21 92.78 92.78 49,125.83

@ Includes indirect labor related costs to be distributed among all funding sources based on indirect costs rate.

@@ Prior Approved.

Approved September 14, 2018 Clark County - Springfield Transportation Coordinating Committee

_________________Director

August 2018 TCC BLANKET & RESERVE Summary SheetBlanket /

Account Account Funding Beginning Adjustments Activity ReserveNumber Name Source Number Balance / Vendor To Date Balance

74101 Salaries Appropriation CY 18 330,000.00$ 218,292.16$ 111,707.84$74110 PERS Appropriation CY 18 46,500.00$ 30,420.80$ 16,079.20$74111 Workers Comp Appropriation CY 18 6,650.00$ 4,570.00$ 2,080.00$ 74112 Unemployment Appropriation CY 18 -$ -$ -$ 74113 Medicare Appropriation CY 18 4,800.00$ 2,962.23$ 1,837.77$ 74120 Dental Appropriation CY 18 1,500.00$ 728.80$ 771.20$ 74121 Life Insurance Appropriation CY 18 300.00$ 153.60$ 146.40$ 74122 Health Insurance Appropriation CY 18 96,000.00$ 62,143.92$ 33,856.08$

485,750.00$ 319,271.51$ 166,478.49$

74140 Travel Prior Year 1,718.15$ Auditor ??? -$ 1,718.15$

718400 Appropriation CY 18 20,000.00$(less) Blanket - xxx 18 - 10871 4,992.29$ 4,992.29$ $0.00(less) Blanket 18 - 12001 5,000.00$ 3,737.59$ 1,262.41$

NEW (less) Blanket 18 - 12868 5,000.00$ -$ 5,000.00$

Remaining balance 5,007.71$ 8,729.88$ 7,980.56$ $12,988.27 Total available balance

74145 Employee Other Prior Year -$ -$

718900 Appropriation CY 18 10,000.00$(less) Blanket 18 - 10872 5,000.00$ -$ 5,000.00$

Remaining balance 5,000.00$ -$ 5,000.00$ $10,000.00 Total available balance

74200 Office Supplies Prior Year -$ -$

721000 Appropriation CY 18 15,000.00$(less) Blanket 18 - 10873 5,000.00$ 3,083.67$ 1,916.33$


74210 Office Equipment -$ -$

751000 Appropriation CY 18 15,000.00$(less) Blanket 18 - 10874 5,000.00$ 496.37$ 4,503.63$

Remaining balance 10,000.00$ 496.37$ 4,503.63$ $14,503.63 Total available balance



74211 Capital Expenses Appropriation CY 18 30,000.00$752000 (less) Blanket 18 - 10875 5,000.00$ -$ 5,000.00$

(less) Reserve 18-12297 9,000.00$ Miovision 8,185.00$ 815.00$


74230 Adv. & Printing Prior Year - xxx 17 - 10286 5,000.00$ CMG Cox Publishing 4,414.28$ 585.72$ 732000 Prior Year -$ -$

Appropriation CY 18 90,000.00$(less) Blanket 18 - 10876 15,000.00$ 2,050.07$ 12,949.93$(less) Reserve 18 - 11490 5,000.00$ NTPRD 5,000.00$ $0.00(less) Reserve 18 - 11491 22,500.00$ Spfld Arts Council 22,500.00$ $0.00(less) Reserve 18 - 11524 10,000.00$ GIS Maps 9,860.00$ 140.00$

(less) Reserve 18 - 11611 2,009.00$ Post Printing 2,009.00$ $0.00

Remaining balance 35,491.00$ 45,833.35$ 13,675.65$$49,166.65 Total available balance

74310 Audit Expenses Prior Year - xxx 17 - 10144 8,500.00$ Charles Harris 7,800.00$ 700.00$

735200 Appropriation CY 17 15,000.00$(less) Blanket 18 - 10877 5,000.00$ 205.00$ 4,795.00$


74401 Contract - Other Prior Year - xxx 17 - 10288 350.00$ Pitney Bowes 301.00$ 49.00$ 744000

Appropriation CY 18 15,000.00$(less) Blanket 18 - 10878 5,000.00$ 2,450.74$ 2,549.26$




74403 Contract - Project Prior Year 17 - 10049 50,000.00$ Burges & Niple 9,743.08$ 40,256.92$ 742000 Prior Year - xxx 17 - 10285 3,000.00$ Miovision 1,200.24$ 1,799.76$

Prior Year - xxx 17 - 10292 1,500.00$ Donet / DataYard 809.40$ 690.60$ Prior Year 17 - 10358 1,650.00$ Info Tech -$ 1,650.00$

Appropriation CY 18 330,000.00$(less) Blanket 18 - 10879 15,000.00$ 10,950.24$ 4,049.76$ (less) Reserve 18 - 10881 29,083.47$ Planning Next 29,083.47$ $0.00(less) Reserve 18 - 11526 49,912.46$ Planning Next 49,912.46$ $0.00(less) Reserve 18 - 12562 100,000.00$ Burgess & Niple -$ 100,000.00$

NEW (less) Blanket 18 - 12869 15,000.00$ -$ 15,000.00$

Remaining balance 121,004.07$ 101,698.89$ 163,447.04$$284,451.11 Total available balance

74900 Other Expenses Prior Year - xxx 17 - 10287 150.00$ Level 3 -$ 150.00$

790000 Appropriation CY 18 100,000.00$(less) Blanket 18 - 10880 5,000.00$ 3,707.51$ 1,292.49$ (less) Automatic Auditor -$ Level 3 420.00$ (420.00)$ (less) Automatic Auditor -$ CORSA Insurance 706.00$ (706.00)$ (less) Reserve 18 - 12309 10,000.00$ ProForma 6,924.37$ 3,075.63$ (less) Reserve 18 - 12310 4,000.00$ ProRider 3,580.00$ 420.00$ (less) Blanket 18 - 12607 5,000.00$ -$ 5,000.00$


74904 Rentals Appropriation CY 18 40,000.00$746000 (less) Reserve 18 - 10882 9,179.75$ Clark Co Comm 9,179.75$ $0.00

(less) Reserve 18 - 11941 9,179.75$ Clark Co Comm 9,179.75$ $0.00NEW (less) Reserve 18 - 12561 9,179.75$ Clark Co Comm 9,179.75$ $0.00

(less) Clark Co Comm -$ $0.00Remaining balance 12,460.75$ 27,539.25$ $0.00

$12,460.75 Total available balance

Prior Year CY 17 71,868.15$Appropriation CY 18 1,165,750.00$ 540,932.54$Remaining balance 310,963.53$ 385,722.08$

$696,685.61 Total available balance

September 2018 TCC Administrative Report 1



Re: Administrative Report

Date: September 7, 2018


FY2018 Planning Work Program Completion ReportThe Completion Report for the last fiscal year’s Planning Work Program is included in this packet and is also available for viewing on the TCC website at http://clarktcc.com/reportslibrary_plans_programs.htm. The Completion Report documents all work completed by the TCC and the budget used to complete that work. Staff will review the document at the September 14 meeting.

Staff requests discussion and approval of Resolution 2018-N by voice vote.

RESOLUTION 2018 - N

OF THE CLARK COUNTY–SPRINGFIELD TRANSPORTATION COORDINATING COMMITTEE TO ACCEPT THE SFY 2018 PLANNING WORK PROGRAM COMPLETION

REPORT

WHEREAS, the Clark County-Springfield Transportation Coordinating Committee (CCSTCC) is designated the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Springfield urbanized area in Clark County by the Governor of the State of Ohio, acting through the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT), and in cooperation with locally elected officials in the area pursuant to Agreement of Cooperation #30100 between ODOT and the Board of Commissioners of Clark County, Ohio; and WHEREAS, CCSTCC has the authority and responsibility for the direction, coordination, and administration of the area-wide transportation planning process in accordance with 23 USC 134 and 49 USC 5303 and as described in the CCSTCC Prospectus dated November 2015; and

WHEREAS, the Planning Work Program establishes the methodologies and budget to implement the area-wide transportation planning process and program activities for the upcoming fiscal year; and

WHEREAS, the SFY 2018 Planning Work Program Completion Report includes a narrative description and financial expenditure summary for each work element in the ODOT approved SFY 2018 Planning Work Program and budget; and

WHEREAS, CCSTCC has reviewed the Completion Report and finds it consistent with the work and budget of the approved SFY 2018 Planning Work Program.

BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED:

That the members of the Clark County –Springfield Transportation Coordinating Committee hereby accept the SFY 2018 Planning Work Program Completion Report.

_____________________________


September 14, 2018

SEPTEMBER, 2018

CLARK COUNTY-SPRINGFIELD

TRANSPORTATION COORDINATING COMMITTEE

FY18PLANNING

WORKPROGRAM

Completion Report

Completion Report FY2018 Planning Work Program__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Work Element 601.1 - Short Range Planning

Budget (Amended 7/13/2018) $123,148 Funding SourceExpenditures $121,338 CPG – ODOT - LocalBudget Balance $1,810% Expended 99%% Work Completed 100%

Work Element 601.11 - Short Range Planning

Budget $48,140 Funding SourceExpenditures $48,089 CPG – ODOT - Local Budget Balance $51 FY2017 Carry Forward% Expended 100%% Work Completed 100%

End ProductsTitle VI Self Assessment (3/18) Delivered 3/18ODOT Safety Program (9/17, 3/18) Complete 3/18FY2018 Planning Work Program (5/18) Delivered 5/18

Work Summary

Transportation Performance MeasuresStaff coordinated with ODOT Central Office to establish Safety Performance Targets for CY2018. Upon review of the statewide targets, Staff recommended supporting the state’s targets and agreeing to plan and program projects to contribute toward the accomplishment of the targets. CCSTCC approved this recommendation in December 2017 by affirming support of the following statewide targets:

1,051 fatalities9,033 serious injuries0.91 fatality rate8.01 serious injury rate840 non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries

Staff began coordination with ODOT Central Office on pavement conditions, bridge conditions, travel time reliability and freight travel time mobility targets during this period. CCSTCC plans to adopt targets in FY2019.

Staff began coordination with ODOT Central Office and the City of Springfield on transit asset management targets during this period. CCSTCC plans to adopt targets in FY2019.

RoadwayStaff conducted corridor operational and safety analyses on Derr Road and Middle Urbana Road. Staff conducted intersection operational and safety analyses on Fairfield Road and US68, US68 and SR41, SR41 and Titus Road, Villa Road and Red Coach Drive, and SR72 and IR70 ramps. Staff coordinated with the Clark County Engineer’s Department on Traffic Impact Studies for roadways adjacent to new school construction in the Shawnee and Greenon local school districts.

Staff assisted local officials on scoping and RFP development on the South Limestone Safety project.Staff assisted the City of New Carlisle on alternative review on the SR235 signal interconnect project.


_____________________________________________________________________________________________

2

Staff completed the CR68 Access Management study, the Plum Street Bridge Modification Study, and the Mad River Trail Feasibility Study with coordination from the TCC’s task order consultant (see Work Element 601.21/601.2). Staff scoped and began work on the Clark County Projects Development Taskand with the consultant (see Work Element 601.21/601.2).

Staff performed field reviews and reviewed crash data on the SR235/SR41 Roundabout project and the SR235 Park Layne corridor project. Staff continued to compile before and after crash data for these and other recent safety projects. Staff assisted ODOT District 7 and ODOT Central Office on TIGER and INFRA applications for the CLA-70 add lane project.

Emergency Management Agency CoordinationStaff continued to develop a close working relationship with the Clark County EMA. Staff continued to participate in the Clark County Local Emergency Planning Committee. Staff participated in quarterly meetings, agency exercises, and EOC basic training.

Highway SafetyStaff attended and participated in Safe Communities Coalition bimonthly meetings with the Clark CountyHealth Department, various other city and county departments, and various law enforcement agencies. Staff additionally attended and participated in Clark County Fatal Crash Review Meetings. Staff participated in Statewide Strategic Highway Safety Plan Steering Committee meetings.

Staff participated in District Safety Review Team meetings regarding ODOT safety hot spots on the US and State system. Staff coordinated local safety planning activities with the Strategic Highway Safety Plan. An ODOT Safety Program application was prepared and submitted for intersection improvements on W. Main Street at Western Avenue in Springfield.

Staff participated in research activities, webinars, and training sessions on roadway safety issues and countermeasures. These included LTAP and ODOT Safety Talk and Safety Peer Exchange webinars and seminars. Staff monitored crash activity at recently completed safety projects.

Air Quality and Congestion MitigationStaff participated in Interagency Consultation on Air Quality conformity for the 1997 Ozone Standard for the Long Range Transportation Plan. The Plan Amendment is proposed to be adopted by CCSTCC in October 2018.

Bicycle and Pedestrian PlanningStaff attended and participated in regional Miami Valley Bikeways and Miami Valley Cycling Summit planning meetings.

Staff attended and participated in Bike Springfield, Springfield Bike Task Force, and Ambassadors of Clark County Trails meetings. Staff participated in the coordination of a Bike to Work Day event in Springfield. Staff coordinated and organized the collection of data from counters placed along the multi-use trails in the planning area. Staff worked with local stakeholders to encourage bike safety and distribute bike helmets to children.

Staff worked with local stakeholders and ODOT Central Office Task Order consultants to develop school travel plans for Springfield City Schools. Staff coordinated field reviews and meetings during the development of the plans.

Federal and State IssuesStaff worked on development of performance measures consistent with the FAST Act and integrating performance measures into the Transportation Plan and TIP. Staff continued participation in webinarsand review on Performance Based Planning and federal NPRM’s.


_____________________________________________________________________________________________

3

OtherStaff participated in Ohio Transportation Engineering Conference, the Ohio Conference on Freight, the Ohio Public Transit Association Conference, and various training sessions hosted by FHWA, ODOT, and LTAP.

Staff worked with the Springfield sub-committee and transportation sub-committee to prioritize local projects for the Priority Development Advocacy Committee (PDAC). Staff assisted in completing a funding application for the South Limestone corridor improvements.

Staff participated in various OARC Transportation Committee meetings and OARC Communications Committee meetings. Staff participated in various ODOT sponsored workshops and seminars covering performance measures, Title VI programs, scenario planning, safety planning and outreach, and civil rights. Staff coordinated and participated in TCC Technical Advisory Committee and TCC Local Officials, Government, and Citizens Advisory Committee meetings.

Staff participated in various Census and American Community Survey webinars and workshops. Staff utilized demographic data from the Census for planning products under various work elements.

Staff compiled data for publication of the FY2017 Annual Listing of Obligated Projects (see 697.1).

Delays or Problems EncounteredNone.


_____________________________________________________________________________________________

4

Work Element 601.2 – General Planning Services

Budget $100,000 Funding SourceExpenditures $28,371 CPG – ODOT - LocalBudget Balance $71,629 Consultant Services Only% Expended 28%% Work Completed 100%

Work Element 601.21 – General Planning Services

Budget $31,000 Funding SourceExpenditures $29,232 CPG – ODOT - LocalBudget Balance $1,768 FY2017 Carry Forward% Expended 94% Consultant Services Only% Work Completed 100%

End ProductsCR68 Access Management Study (9/17) Complete 10/17Mad River Trail Feasibility Study (12/17) Complete 2/18Plum Street Bridge Modification Study (12/17) Complete 2/18Clark County Projects Development (9/18)Middle Urbana Corridor Study (12/18)

Work SummaryThis work element tracks expenditures for a general services consultant contract and its associated task orders. A summary of each task order follows.

CR68 Access Management StudyThe CR68 Access Management Study was scoped and began in FY2017. The study examined traffic and crash data and made recommendations to proper driveway spacing along Urbana Road north of Springfield. The study also made several specific recommendations to the area near the Navistar assembly plant to reduce travel time and increase truck safety in the area. During this period, the study team assembled and met with freight and other stakeholders and finalized recommendations for the corridor. Recommendations were finalized and delivered to the CCSTCC.

Mad River Trail Feasibility StudyThe Mad River Trail Feasibility Study was scoped and began in FY2017. The study analyzed three alternatives to connect the existing trail system in Springfield to the newly developed Mad River Gorge west of Springfield. During this period, the study team assembled and met with park operators and other stakeholders and finalized potential trail alignments. Recommendations were finalized and delivered to the CCSTCC.

Plum Street Bridge Modification StudyThe Plum Street Bridge Modification Study was scoped and completed during this period. The study analyzed potential modifications to the bridge deck over Buck Creek to allow for safe bicycle and pedestrian connection between Veterans Park and Snyder Park. During this period, the study team assembled and reviewed conditions and the constructability of improvements to the deck. Recommendations were finalized and delivered to the CCSTCC.


_____________________________________________________________________________________________

5

Clark County Projects DevelopmentThe Clark County Projects Development task was scoped and began during this period. The task is to examine existing and future conditions on two corridors and an intersection and to propose roadway and multimodal improvements. The corridors included Enon-Xenia Road, adjacent to a proposed new school site, and E. Home Road, adjacent to a bike lane project currently under construction on Croft Road. The task will also examine constructing a roundabout at Selma Road and W. Possum Road, also adjacent to a proposed new school site. The study team began compiling traffic and crash data and completing field reviews during this period.

Middle Urbana Corridor StudyThe Middle Urbana Corridor Study was scoped and began during this period. The task is to examine existing and future conditions between SR334 and Moorefield Road and propose roadway and multimodal improvements. The corridor is adjacent to a proposed new school site. The study team began compiling traffic and crash data and completing field reviews during this period.

Delays or Problems EncounteredAll work by the consultant team was completed within each task order timeframe, however final report and delivery to CCSTCC was delayed at times due to scheduling and agenda for board meetings.


_____________________________________________________________________________________________

6

Work Element 602.1 – Transportation Improvement Program

Budget (Amended 2/9/2018) $33,663 Funding SourceExpenditures $30,013 CPG – ODOT – LocalBudget Balance $3,650% Expended 89%% Work Completed 100%

End ProductsTIP and MPO sub-allocated funds management (Ongoing)Project review meetings (Quarterly) Complete 3/17

Work SummaryTIP Review Meetings were held on 11/16/2017 and 5/23/2018. All projects were reviewed to ensure compliance with schedules and to determine if additional actions were required. Meetings were attended by TCC staff, project sponsors, and ODOT staff.

A total of four (4) TIP amendments were prepared by staff and approved during this fiscal year. Three (3) of these amendments were project modifications; one was to include the CY2018 Highway Safety performance targets in the TIP narrative.

Staff maintained the TCC’s Capital Program by tracking project progress to ensure that Federally-allocated funds were balanced and in coordination with ODOT’s TIP program management policies.

The FY2020-2023 TIP development cycle was initiated during this fiscal year. Staff prepared a preliminary budget and schedule, and developed and transmitted funding applications to local jurisdictions.



_____________________________________________________________________________________________

7

Work Element 605.1 – Surveillance

Budget (Amended 7/13/2018) $53,098 Funding SourceExpenditures $49,849 CPG – ODOT – LocalBudget Balance $3,249% Expended 94%% Work Completed 100%

End ProductsMaintain Road and Street Address Inventory (Ongoing)Maintain Highway and Transit Networks (Ongoing)Various data file and exhibit updates (Ongoing)Web-Based Traffic Count Data Base (Ongoing)2017 Local Roadway Safety Program (10/17) Delivered 10/172017 Traffic Counts Complete (12/17) Complete 12/172010 Functional Classification and NHS Updates (None) Delivered 10/17

Work Summary

Incorporating Speed Data into the Planning ProcessStaff continued working with the National Performance Management Research Data Set (NPMRDS) to incorporate travel times into the planning process. Staff attended training sessions on working with the NPMRDS on national performance measures related to reliability, congestion, and freight (PM3).

Traffic Counts and Web-Based Traffic Count DatabaseStaff completed the 2017 collection of traffic counts in cooperation with ODOT, the City of Springfield, the Clark County Engineer’s Department, and the PUCO. Staff collected traffic counts in the City of Springfield utilizing video detection equipment and online processing. Staff maintained the online web-based traffic count database for the entire planning area. Staff continued to upload new traffic data at the close of the traffic counting season. Staff continued to maintain a database of HPMS ADTs and a schedule for counting each location.

Staff compiled speed and count data from the Clark County Engineer’s Department, the Clark County Sheriff’s Office, and the City of Springfield portable speed trailers at various locations in Clark County.

Crash DataStaff sorted and reviewed 2014-2016 crash data and prepared the 2017 Local Roadway Safety Program. The document was last updated in 2015. Included in the data are safety rankings for high crash intersections and all Federal-aid segments in the planning area.

Staff utilized the ODOT GCAT system to download geolocated crash data and create local shapefile data. Staff worked mislocated or unlocated crash data to correct geospatial accuracy.

Staff collected and analyzed crash data for various local projects. Staff collected and analyzed crash data for County Fatal Crash Review meetings.

Functional Classification and NHS Updates2010 Census revisions to the Functional Classification system and National Highway System were completed during this period. Draft updates were reviewed and coordinated with ODOT and FHWA in 2013.


_____________________________________________________________________________________________

8

GIS/OtherStaff compiled and geocoded traffic data from various sources into shapefiles. This data includes bridge and pavement condition from ODOT’s TIMS system and crash data from ODOT’s GCAT system.

Staff attended and participated in various Traffic Academy, Safety, GIS, and Travel Demand Modeling classes and workshops.



_____________________________________________________________________________________________

9

Work Element 610.1 – Long Range Planning

Budget (Amended 7/13/2018) $57,599 Funding SourceExpenditures $56,600 CPG – ODOT – LocalBudget Balance $999% Expended 98%% Work Completed 100%

Work Element 610.11 – Long Range Planning

Budget $31,291 Funding SourceExpenditures $31,257 CPG – ODOT – LocalBudget Balance $34 FY2017 Carry Forward% Expended 100%% Work Completed 100%

End ProductsAssistance in Clark County Comprehensive Land Use Planning (Ongoing)Implementation of 2040 Transportation Plan (Ongoing)

Work SummaryStaff worked with a consultant team and local stakeholder committee to finalize an update the Clark County Comprehensive Plan. Staff coordinated and participated in stakeholder and public meetings for the Comprehensive Plan development. Staff coordinated and participated in stakeholder meetings for the development of an updated Thoroughfare Plan.

Staff participated in local technical review, zoning, and planning board committee meetings. Staff reviewed proposed changes to zoning for long range transportation forecasting. Staff participated in Ohio Travel Demand Model Users Group meetings and long range scenario planning workshops and webinars.



_____________________________________________________________________________________________

10

Work Element 610.2 – Clark County Comprehensive Plan

Budget (Amended 2/9/2018) $138,000 Funding SourceExpenditures $131,851 CPG – ODOT – Local (60% ofBudget Balance $6,149 total costs)% Expended 96% Consultant Services Only% Work Completed 100%

Work Element 610.21 – Clark County Comprehensive Plan

Budget (Amended 2/9/2018) $30,303 Funding SourceExpenditures $30,303 CPG – ODOT – Local (60% ofBudget Balance $0 total costs)% Expended 100% FY2017 Carry Forward% Work Completed 100% Consultant Services Only

End ProductsClark County Comprehensive Plan Update (6/18) Delivered (5/18)Clark County Thoroughfare Plan Update (None) Delivered (5/18)

Work SummaryThe Clark County Comprehensive Plan was finalized during this period. The consultant team completed historical plan and document review, completed data collection, and completed a public engagement during this period.

A total of five (5) stakeholder meetings and four (4) public involvement meetings were held during this period. In addition to the stakeholder and public meetings, additional targeted informational meetings were held with the TCC’s Technical Advisory Committee, agricultural and preservation committees, the Chamber of Commerce, and various other business groups and associations.

The consultant team finalized future land use maps, objectives and actions, and a thoroughfare plan revision during this period.



_____________________________________________________________________________________________

11

Work Element 625.1 – Rural Transportation Planning

Budget $98,393 Funding SourceExpenditures $53,566 SPR – ODOT – LUC% Expended 54%% Work Completed 100%

Work SummaryFY2018 was the first year that CCSTCC provided contract transportation planning services to the Rural Transportation Planning Organization for Logan and Champaign Counties. See the LUC Planning Work Program Completion Report for detail.



_____________________________________________________________________________________________

12

Work Element 665.1 – Air Quality Advocacy Program

Budget $40,000 Funding SourceExpenditures $24,007 CMAQ – Local Budget Balance $15,993% Expended 60%% Work Completed 100%

End Products

Air Pollution and Rideshare Public Awareness Campaign (Ongoing)Air Pollution Advisory Alerts Media Announcements (On Declared AQ Days)

Work SummaryStaff conducted an informational and promotional Air Quality campaign through partnerships with the Springfield Summer Arts Festival and local recreational programs. The focus of these campaigns included the federal “It all adds up to cleaner air” messaging and the TCC air quality advocacy website.

There were nine (9) Air Pollution Advisory Days declared by RAPCA during FY2018.



_____________________________________________________________________________________________

13

Work Element 667.1 – Rideshare Program

Budget $15,000 Funding SourceExpenditures $10,219 CMAQBudget Balance $4,781% Expended 68%% Work Completed 100%

End ProductsRide Matching (As Needed)Park and Ride Lot Monitoring (Ongoing)Coordination with Large Employers and Schools (Ongoing)

Work SummaryStaff conducted an informational and promotional Rideshare campaign through partnership in the Springfield Winter Arts Festival.

Staff worked with local employers on marketing Rideshare to employees. Staff maintained a local database of potential carpool users and coordinates matches where feasible.

Staff continued to monitor the use of the Park and Ride Lots on Middle Urbana Road, Moorefield Road, Leffel Lane, and SR54. Staff maintained an inventory of all Park and Ride and Rideshare highway signage.



_____________________________________________________________________________________________

14

Work Element 674.1 – Paratransit Planning

Budget $2,907 Funding SourceExpenditures $0 CPG – ODOT – Local Budget Balance $2,907% Expended 0%% Work Completed 100%

End ProductsFTA Section 5310 Program Review (1/18) Complete 1/18Paratransit Coordination Assistance (As-Needed)ADA Transit Riders Advisory Committee (Monthly)

Work SummaryStaff assisted various agencies in applying for the FTA 5310 – Enhanced Mobility for Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities program and assisted previous recipients with mandatory reporting requirements. All work completed during this period was accomplished and recorded under Work Element 674.3.



_____________________________________________________________________________________________

15

Work Element 674.2 – Transit Planning

Budget (Amended 7/13/2018) $74,000 Funding SourceExpenditures $51,033 FTA 5307 – LocalBudget Balance $22,967% Expended 69%% Work Completed 100%

End ProductsUrban Transit Program Applications (11/17, 6/18) NoneSCAT Safety and Security Planning Review (Ongoing)Ohio Public Transit Data Certification (2/18) Complete 2/18

Work SummaryNo Urban Transit Program Applications were submitted during this fiscal year. An Ohio Transit Preservation Partnership Program (OTPPP) application for preventative maintenance and ADA paratransit service was submitted by the City of Springfield and approved by ODOT during this fiscal year.

Staff provided technical assistance to the City of Springfield and Springfield City Area Transit (SCAT). Staff assisted with various planning functions, including record keeping and reporting and service improvements. Staff assisted with shelter inventory and placement.

Staff provided technical assistance to the City of Springfield and SCAT on routing and fare changes that were approved in FY2016. Staff met monthly with City of Springfield and SCAT staff for transit system progress report meetings.



_____________________________________________________________________________________________

16

Work Element 674.3 – Coordinated Public Transit Plan

Budget (Amended 7/13/2018) $40,271 Funding SourceExpenditures $39,985 CPG – ODOT – Local Budget Balance $286% Expended 99%% Work Completed 100%

End ProductsCoordinated Public Transportation Plan Implementation (Ongoing)Transportation Providers Roundtable Meetings (Quarterly)Draft FY2017 Coordinated Public Transportation Plan (10/17) Delivered 12/17Final FY2017 Coordinated Public Transportation Plan (12/17) Delivered 2/18

Work SummaryStaff coordinated and met bimonthly with local transportation providers at Human Services and Coordinated Transportation Advisory Committee meetings. The advisory committee meetings served to assist in coordination between providers, social service agencies, and local nonprofits. Staff provided planning assistance to advisory committee partners that expressed interest in applying for various FTA funds.

Staff worked with regional partners outside of Clark County on continuing coordination efforts. Staff participated in regional coordination meetings with MVRPC in Dayton. Staff worked with local transportation officials in Logan and Champaign Counties on developing additional coordination projects to enhance service to populations in the three counties.

Staff finalized the FY2018 Coordinated Public Transportation Plan. Staff worked with local transportation providers and ODOT Office of Transit to document existing conditions, an assessment of needs and gaps, and goals and strategies to improve transportation services.

Delays or Problems EncounteredThe draft and development of an update to the Coordinated Public Transportation Plan was delayed to allow time to incorporate the ODOT Office of Transit’s new statewide template for Coordinated Plans.


_____________________________________________________________________________________________

17

Work Element 682.1 – Ohio Public Works Commission Program Support

Budget $65,000 Funding SourceExpenditures $12,542 OPWCBudget Balance $52,458% Expended 19%% Work Completed 100%

End ProductsNarrative and Financial Reports for the Program (Ongoing)Program Kickoff (7/17) Complete 7/17Preliminary Application Review (10/17) Complete 10/17Final Application Review (11/17) Complete 11/17Consolidated Application Package – Round 32 (12/17) Complete 12/17Preparation Round 33 (5/18) Complete 5/18

Work SummaryStaff provided agenda and minutes for Executive Committee meetings.

Staff received and reviewed preliminary applications and solicited final applications from project sponsors. Staff prepared submittal of completed applications to OPWC.

Staff began preparation for the next round of OPWC funding.

Staff assisted potential applicants with questions and concerns about the OPWC process throughout the year.



_____________________________________________________________________________________________

18

Work Element 682.2 – West Central Ohio Port Authority Administration

Budget $90,000 Funding SourceExpenditures $56,473 WESTCOBudget Balance $33,527% Expended 63%% Work Completed 100%

End ProductsAdministration services (Ongoing)Annual budget (12/17) Delivered 12/17

Work SummaryStaff managed deposits and payments for regular business activities and real estate transaction proceeds.

Staff worked with Auditor of State staff on financial reviews.

Staff coordinated with Genesee and Wyoming staff on simple rail maintenance issues.

Staff continued the maintenance of the WESTCO website.

Staff completed and delivered an annual budget which was approved by the WESTCO Board of Directors in December 2017.



_____________________________________________________________________________________________

19

Work Element 682.31 – Clean Ohio Program – OPWC District 11

Budget $15,000 Funding SourceExpenditures $2,990 Clean OhioBudget Balance $12,010% Expended 20%% Work Completed 100%

End ProductNarrative and financial reports for the program (Ongoing)Applications solicitation and scoring (10/17) Complete 10/17Consolidated application package (12/17) Complete 12/17

Work SummaryStaff reviewed and scored applications for the Clean Ohio program. All applications were submitted to OPWC.



_____________________________________________________________________________________________

20

Work Element 697.1 – Public Involvement

Budget (Amended 7/13/2018) $36,407 Funding SourceExpenditures $20,911 CPG – ODOT – Local Budget Balance $15,496% Expended 57%% Work Completed 60%

End ProductsFY2017 Annual Listing of Projects (9/17) Delivered 9/17Annual Newsletter (10/17) Delivered 9/17FY2018 Public Participation Plan Update (12/17) Delivered 5/18Maintenance and Upgrade of Website (Ongoing)Public Involvement Activities (As needed)

Work Summary

FY2017 Annual Listing of ProjectsStaff coordinated and developed the FY2017 Annual Listing of Obligated Projects and map during this period. The listing was delivered to the CCSTCC on 9/8/2017 and included in the Annual CCSTCC Newsletter. The listing was also published on the CCSTCC website.

Annual NewsletterStaff prepared and distributed the Annual 2017 CCSTCC Newsletter. The newsletter was delivered to the CCSTCC at the 8/11/2017 TCC Annual meeting, then posted on the CCSTCC website and mailed to local stakeholders in September 2017 to allow for inclusion of the FY2017 Annual Listing of Obligated Projects.

FY2018 Public Participation Plan UpdateAn update to the CCSTCC’s Public Participation Plan was developed and approved by the CCSTCC on 3/9/2018. Two public meetings were held on 1/30/2018 during the 45 day public comment period for review and comment on the draft document.

Maintenance of websiteStaff maintained information on the CCSTCC website, including a calendar of events, CCSTCC produced documents, and ongoing local studies and projects information. Staff scoped and reviewed proposals to update the layout of the CCSTCC website. After review of consultant proposals, staff recommended developing an update to the website in-house.

Public Involvement ActivitiesStaff promoted CCSTCC plans and programs at the Clark County Fair and other various local festivals and events.


September 2018 TCC Transportation Planning Report *REVISED 9/12/2018



Re: Transportation Planning Report

Date: September 7, 2018, *REVISED September 12, 2018


FY 2018 Annual Listing of Obligated ProjectsThe FY2018 Annual Listing of Obligated Projects and map is available on the TCC website at: http://clarktcc.com/transimprove.htm. The listed funds are those that received Federal Authorization (or obligation) but not necessarily encumbered or spent during the past year. The Annual Listing is a federal requirement and will be included in the Annual Newsletter and published on the website.

Staff requests discussion and approval of Resolution 2018-O by voice vote.

2040 Transportation Plan and FY2018-2021 TIP ConformityA new conformity determination for the current Transportation Plan and current Transportation Improvement Program is needed due to a US Court of Appeals decision regarding the 1997 Ozone Standard. Both the 1997 Ozone standard and the 1997 PM2.5 standard were revoked in April 2015 and October 2016 respectively for all purposes including conformity. However the appeals court decision (No. 15-1115) struck down portions of the 2008 Ozone Standards SIP Requirements Rule associated with the revocation of the 1997 Ozone Standard. Areas such as ours that were maintenance for the 1997 Ozone Standard at the time of revocation and are designated as attainment for the 2008 Ozone Standard and have not been required to make transportation conformity determinations are required, as a result of this decision, to restart the conformity process.

The Technical Memorandum, including interagency consultation documentation and ozone emission summaries, has been posted on the TCC website at: http://clarktcc.com/airquality.htm. A copy of the tech memo is also included in this packet. The tech memo will also be available for review and comment at the September 12 Public Involvement Open House at Springview.

Staff requests discussion and approval of Resolution 2018-T by voice vote.

FY2018-2021 TIP AmendmentThree projects are to be modified with the proposed TIP amendment. These modifications are as follows:


New Carlisle Trail Signs Project – Deleting the project and removing the TA funds at the request of the project sponsor.Yellow Springs Street Resurfacing Project – Deleting the project at the request of the project sponsor. STBG funds were removed previously via Resolution 2017-K.Main and Western Signal Upgrade Project – Adding the project and associated Safety funding for PE, RW, and CO phases.

Staff requests discussion and approval of Resolution 2018-P (revised to affirm consistency with the conformity determination) by voice vote.

Transit Asset Management Performance MeasuresCurrent Federal transportation regulations require that MPO’s establish targets for fourTransit Asset Management performance measures. CCSTCC and the City of Springfield, acting as the transit operator for the MPO area, must coordinate to establish targets for the performance measures per three party agreement with ODOT. The fourState of Good Repair performance measures for capital assets are:

Equipment: (non-revenue) service vehicles. Percentage of vehicles that havemet or exceeded their Useful Life Benchmarks (ULB).Rolling stock: Percentage of revenue vehicles within a particular asset class thathave met or exceeded their ULB.Infrastructure: rail fixed-guideway, track, signals, and systems. The percentageof track segments with performance restrictions.Facilities. Percentage of facilities within a particular asset rated below condition3 on the Transit Economic Requirements Model (TERM) scale.

In consultation with the City of Springfield and Springfield City Area Transit, staff has recommended the following performance targets


The fourth performance measure for rail infrastructure is not applicable to the City of Springfield’s transit system.

Staff requests discussion of these targets and approval of the following items by voice vote:

Target Setting – Resolution 2018-Q2040 Transportation Plan Amendment – Resolution 2018-R (revised to affirm consistency with the conformity determination)FY2018-2021 TIP Amendment – Resolution 2018-S (revised to affirm consistency with the conformity determination)


FY2020-2023 TIP Development UpdateThe TIP program application solicitation closed on August 31. Staff will briefly review a summary of what was received and the TIP development schedule moving forward.

Staff was informed on September 10 that ODOT intends to delay the TIP development process by one year “in hopes of having a clearer picture of future funding.” The next scheduled update will be for a FY2021-2024 TIP and development will start this time next year. Staff intends to review received funding applications and provide a recommendation to fund additional projects even though there will be no new TIP program approved next Spring.

Informational only, no action requested at this time.

RESOLUTION 2018 - O

OF THE CLARK COUNTY–SPRINGFIELD TRANSPORTATION COORDINATING COMMITTEE TO ACCEPT THE SFY 2018 ANNUAL LISTING OF OBLIGATED PROJECTS

WHEREAS, the Clark County-Springfield Transportation Coordinating Committee (CCSTCC) is designated the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Springfield urbanized area in Clark County by the Governor of the State of Ohio, acting through the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT), and in cooperation with locally elected officials in the area pursuant to Agreement of Cooperation #30100 between ODOT and the Board of Commissioners of Clark County, Ohio; and

WHEREAS, CCSTCC has the authority and responsibility for the direction, coordination, and administration of the area-wide transportation planning process in accordance with 23 USC 134 and 49 USC 5303 and as described in the CCSTCC Prospectus dated November 2015; and

WHEREAS, CCSTCC is required to develop and publish an annual listing of projects, including investments in pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities, for which funds under 23 USC or 49 USC 53 were obligated in the preceding program year; and

WHEREAS, the SFY 2018 Annual Listing of Obligated Projects includes TIP information under 450 CFR 324(e)(1), including, for each project listed, the amount of Federal funds requested in the TIP, the Federal funding that was obligated during the preceding year, and the Federal funding remaining and available for subsequent years; and

WHEREAS, the SFY 2018 Annual Listing of Obligated Projects was prepared cooperatively with ODOT and public transportation operators.


That the members of the Clark County –Springfield Transportation Coordinating Committee hereby accept the SFY 2018 Annual Listing of Obligated Projects.

_____________________________


September 14, 2018

Item PID Project Name Project Description Sponsor Federal Funds

Obligated in FY2018

Total Federal Funds in the FY2018-2021

TIP

Federal Funds Available for

Subsequent Years

1 88796 CLA-US40 26.03 Bridge replacement ODOT $ 398,600.00 SLI $ - 2 99563 CLA-Bechtle 0.57 Bridge rehabilitation Springfield $ 1,527,346.56 $ 1,482,296.56 $ 1,458,329.56

3 75315 CLA-IR70 20.92 Reconstruction and resurfacing ODOT $ 60,026.24 - $ - 4 75316 CLA-IR70/IR675 0.51/0.00 Resurfacing ODOT $ 93,543.87 SLI $ - 5 83663 CLA-IR70/SR72 10.55/6.50 Reconstruction and resurfacing ODOT $ 47,586,040.00 $ 49,349,471.60 $ 49,005,725.95 6 89421 CLA-Villa Rd Road widening, improve drainage, and add a traffic signal Springfield $ 108,156.66 $ - $ - 7 92876 CLA-SR72 6.77 Pavement planing and resurfacing ODOT $ 619,008.00 SLI $ - 8 93180 CLA-SR72 10.04 Pavement planing and resurfacing ODOT $ 39,000.61 SLI $ - 9 94672 CLA-SR41 26.75/26.93/29.18 Culvert construction/reconstruction/repair ODOT $ 598,360.00 SLI $ - 10 94768 CLA-Middle Urbana Rehab Road widening to accommodate center left turn lane Springfield $ 1,137,075.97 $ 1,253,865.97 $ 2,250.00 11 94796 CLA-Belmont Ave Recon Ph 1 Resurfacing Springfield $ 44.53 $ - $ -

12 94797 CLA-CCE Var Road ReconResurface and berm widening. In addition a bike lane will be constructed along Croft Rd, and a left turn lane on Croft Rd. at Robert Eastman Rd. Clark County $ 2,075,281.09 $ 2,126,085.15 $ -

13 94806 CLA-East St. Reconstruction Resurfacing and ADA intersection improvements Springfield $ 11,080.60 $ 564,230.25 $ - 14 94814 CLA-Belmont Ave Recon Ph 2 Reconstruction and resurfacing Springfield $ 372,951.00 $ 2,141,275.12 $ 2,044,204.12

15 95196CLA/DAR IR675/SR118 1.02/14.50 Culvert construction/reconstruction/repair ODOT $ 24.72 SLI $ -

16 97956 CLA-Smooth FY2018 Resurfacing ODOT $ 1,696,725.91 SLI $ - 17 99510 CLA-CR338 0.00 Rehabilitate roadway and replace bridge Clark County $ 82,277.00 $ 844,858.44 $ 748,640.44 18 100923 CLA-Micro FY18 Microsurface various routes ODOT $ 1,207,560.00 SLI $ - 19 101044 CHP/CLA-CHIP FY17 Resurfacing various routes ODOT $ 38,858.30 SLI $ - 20 101066 CHP/CLA-SMOOTH FY2017 Resurfacing various routes ODOT $ 238,683.48 SLI $ - 21 104810 CLA-CR314-0.15 Resurfacing Clark County $ 859,680.00 $ 859,680.00 $ 859,680.00 22 104815 CLA-Yellow Springs St Resurf Resurfacing Springfield $ 157,590.00 $ 1,042,360.00 $ 856,960.00 23 104831 CLA-McCreight Reconstruction and resurfacing Springfield $ 272,000.00 $ 1,883,729.60 $ 1,544,789.60

24 80450 CLA-CR333 0.00Resurfacing, add a center left turn lane, and dedicated turn lanes at intersections. Clark County $ 22,661.45 $ - -

25 92813 CLA-CR385 1.00

Construct five foot paved shoulders and install a NB right turn lane at Kingsgate Dr, install a NB right turn lane at Montego Dr., and install a traffic signal at Montego Dr. Clark County $ 345,736.68 $ - $ -

26 94632 CLA-SR235 0.23 Access management, lighting and pedestrian improvements ODOT $ 177,797.03 SLI $ - 27 94639 CLA-SR41/235 30.79/8.65 Construction of a high speed roundabout ODOT $ 356.32 $ - $ -

28 98859 CLA-Bechtle SignalsReplace controllers and coordinate with a radio interconnect from US40 to SR41. Add PTZ camera where applicable. Springfield $ 252,529.25 $ - $ -

29 103791 CLA-US40 16.82 Reconstruct traffic signal Springfield $ 230,536.25 $ 232,154.07 $ - 30 104833 CLA-Derr Rd 0.00 Roadway section improvement Springfield $ 132,600.00 $ 1,147,836.00 $ 1,147,836.00

31 105984CLA-German Township Sign Grant Safety sign grant ODOT $ 1,158.00 SLI $ -

32 105989CLA-Green Township Sign Grant Safety sign grant ODOT $ 11,497.90 SLI $ -

33 106287 CLA-SR72 6.83 Safety study Springfield $ 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00

34 99768CLA-CCS-TCC 19 AQ Advocacy CCSTCC FY2019 Air Quality Advocacy Program

CCSTCC $ 32,000.00 $ 32,000.00 $ -

35 99769CLA-CCS-TCC FY 19 Rideshare CCSTCC FY2019 Rideshare Program CCSTCC $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00

36 94791CLA-Enon Main St. Improvements

Install lighting and conduit on both sides of Main St. Upgrade current sidewalks to include ADA compliant requirements and minor damage improvements Enon $ 276,500.00 $ 284,100.00 $ -

37 99555 CLA-N. Murray/Mount Vernon Install sidewalk on one side of the roadway Springfield $ 6,611.08 $ 64,294.59 $ - 38 99562 CLA-Trail Maintenance Maintenance of trail network Springfield $ 115,301.15 $ 315,036.06 $ - 39 104677 CLA-SR235 4.44/4.77 Reconstruct traffic signal New Carlisle $ 90,735.00 $ 669,435.00 $ 642,650.00 40 107122 CLA-N. Burnett Rd IORY RR Crossing protection ORDC $ 283,000.00 SLI $ -

41OH-2016-

037-01Bus: Supported Equip and Facilities No description listed Springfield $ 18,801.00 $ - $ -

42OH-2017-

019-00 Other Capital Items (Bus) No description listed Springfield $ 518,595.00 $ - $ -

43OH-2018-

013-00 Bus - Rolling Stock No description listed Springfield $ 810,000.00 $ - $ -

44OH-2018-

013-00 Bus - Rolling Stock No description listed Springfield $ 695,000.00 $ - $ -

45OH-2018-

013-00 Other Capital Items (Bus) No description listed Springfield $ 660,000.00 $ - $ -

Note: Statewide Line Items (SLI) - total project cost is shown as $0 in the TIP.

Transit Projects

FY2018 Annual Listing of Obligated Projects

Bridge Projects

Road Projects

Safety Projects

Air Quality Projects

Other Projects

18

18

18 !(1

!(2

!(16

!(21

!(4

!(3

!(19

!(18

!(5

!(20

!(17

!(7

!(12

!(6

!(11

!(8

!(10

!(14

!(13

!(23

!(22

!(15

!(9

!(24

!(25

!(26

!(30

!(33

!(27

!(29

!(28 !(40

!(39

!(36

!(37

LegendProject Type

Bridge

Road

Safety

Rail

Signal

Other

9

16 16

FY2018 Annual List of Obligated Projects

¯

Pike TownshipGerman Township

MoorefieldTownship

Pleasant Township

Harmony TownshipBethel Township

Mad RiverTownship

Green Township

Springfield Township

Madison Township

3918

RESOLUTION 2018 – T

OF THE CLARK COUNTY-SPRINGFIELD TRANSPORTATION COORDINATING COMMITTEE TO ESTABLISH CONFORMITY FOR THE 2040 LONG RANGE

TRANSPORATION PLAN AND SFY2018-2021 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM UNDER THE 1997 OZONE STANDARD


WHEREAS, the CCSTCC is responsible for maintaining the area’s Long Range Transportation Plan, in cooperation with local governments, transportation providers, and ODOT; and

WHEREAS, the CCSTCC adopted its current 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (Plan) in May 2016; and

WHEREAS, the Plan is the result of a coordinated effort that reflects Federal requirements and regional priorities and is consistent with the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act); and

WHEREAS, the Plan is fiscally constrained; and

WHEREAS, the CCSTCC current SFY2018-2021 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is consistent with the Plan; and

WHEREAS, the CCSTCC, with cooperation from ODOT and the Miami Valley Regional Planning Commission, has updated the regional air quality emissions analysis to conform to the 1997 Ozone standards in the Dayton/Springfield Air Quality Region; and

WHEREAS, the CCSTCC 2040 Long Range Plan and TIP conformity determination is made consistent with the April 2012, US EPA Transportation Conformity Regulations; and

WHEREAS, the conformity determination was available to the public for comment following the CCSTCC Public Participation Plan.


That the members of the Clark County-Springfield Transportation Coordinating Committee approves the conformity determination for the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan and SFY2018-2021 Transportation Improvement Program.

_____________________________

Elmer BeardChairman

September 14, 2018

Technical MemorandumMVRPC/Clark County-Springfield TCC

Long Range Transportation Plan AmendmentsMobile Emissions Estimate

July 2018

By MVRPC and Ohio Department of Transportation

In coordination with Clark County-Springfield TCC

Table of Contents

1. Overview 2. Urban Travel Demand Modeling3. Emission Factor Generation4. Post Processing5. Multiple MPO Cooordination Issues

Appendix A Interagency Consultation Documentation

Appendix BB.1 Post Processing Default DistributionsB.2 Ozone Emission Summaries

1. Overview

This memorandum is intended to document the air quality analyses and underlying assumptions performed by the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT), Division of Planning – Modeling and Forecasting Section and the Miami Valley Regional Planning Commission (MVRPC) for the September/October 2018 Amendments to the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plans.

The D/S Region is comprised of the counties of Clark, Greene, Miami, and Montgomery in west-central Ohio. Three counties (Clark, Greene, and Montgomery) are designated attainment/former maintenance for the Annual PM2.5 Standard. All four counties are designated attainment/former maintenance for the 1997 Ozone Standard. Clark County Springfield Transportation Coordinating Committee (CCS-TCC) serves as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for Clark County while MVRPC serves as the MPO for the remainder counties: Greene, Miami, and Montgomery.

Both the 1997 Ozone standard and the 1997 PM2.5 standard were revoked in April 2015 and October 2016 respectively for all purposes including conformity. However a recent U.S. Court of Appeals decision (No. 15-1115) struck down portions of the 2008 Ozone Standards SIP Requirements Rule associated with the revocation of the 1997 Ozone Standard. Areas such as ours that were maintenance for the 1997 Ozone Standard at the time of revocation and are designated as attainment for the 2008 Ozone Standard and have not been required to make transportation conformity determinations are required, as a result of this decision, to restart the conformity process.

The ODOT Modeling and Forecasting section performed the MOVES runs to generate travel demand model based emission factors as well as the complete air quality analyses for Clark County. Using ODOT generated emission factors, MVRPC completed the air quality analyses for Greene, Miami, and Montgomery Counties.

Latest Planning Assumptions

The ozone regional emissions analysis meets the latest planning assumption requirement. As discussed in Section 2 of this report, the modeling process used to develop each MPO emissions is calibrated using the latest population and land use data available and is validated using corresponding traffic count data. Currently, the travel demand models are validated to year 2010(CCS-TCC) or year 2005 (MVRPC) depending on available data.

U.S. EPA’s most recent emissions software, MOVES, is used for all mobile source emission analyses with MOVES inputs being established at various interagency consultation meetingsbetween November 2010 and April 2012. Revised MOVES budgets were approved on October 24, 2013 (78 FR 63388) for ozone.

Additional interagency consultation meetings took place on June 2018 to address issues specific to the September/October 2018 LRTP amendments (See Appendix A).

On Road Mobile Emission Summary

Table 1 presents a summary of emissions for the applicable counties in the D/S Region for the required precursors VOC and NOx for the ozone standard. The results indicate that the 2040 Plans and TIPs demonstrate conformity to the Ozone State Implementation Plans (SIPs) consistent with the April 2012 U.S. EPA Transportation Conformity Regulations.

The remainder of the document focuses on the assumptions behind the analyses.

Table 1 – Dayton/Springield Region On-Road Mobile Emissions OZONE

Tons / Day2018

Budget2020

Emissions2030

Emissions2040

EmissionsMVRPC

VOC 14.09 7.99 5.40NOx 15.86 7.10 4.33

CCS-TCCVOC 2.74 1.59 1.10NOx 3.39 1.56 0.98

TotalsVOC 22.35 16.83 9.58 6.50NOx 32.47 19.25 8.66 5.30

2. Urban Travel Demand Models

CCS-TCC and MVRPC maintain regional travel demand forecasting models for use in the urban transportation planning process. The models employ the traditional four step modeling process to project existing and future traffic volumes and travel patterns on the regional transportation network. The four step process consists of trip generation, trip distribution, modal split, and route assignment. Output from the urban models is link-by-link directional 24-hour traffic volumes.

During 2000-2002 MVRPC, in cooperation with the Ohio Kentucky Indiana Regional Council of Governments, updated its travel demand model. The new model includes the combined regions under the jurisdictions of OKI and MVRPC. In 2005, the combined model was updated again to incorporate the results of a household interview survey in the MVRPC Region, change the model interface to Cube Voyager, and improve model functionality. The changes primarily affected trip generation distribution functions in the MVRPC Region. In 2011 in preparation for the 2012 Transportation Plan Update the model was validated using circa 2005 traffic counts. The 2005 Cube Voyager model with the latest planning assumptions (networks and socio-economic data) is used to calculate 2018-2040 emissions in the MVRPC Region. MVRPC’s August 2018 LRTP Amendment emission analyses directory structure can be seen in Figure 1.

Figure 1 – MVRPC Emission Analyses Runs Directory Structure

Similarly, the Springfield Region also has a new travel demand model that combined with the latest planning assumptions was used to generate emissions in Clark County. The new travel demand model now covers all of Clark County and was validated in March 2018 to year 2010 counts, more information is available at

http://www.dot.state.oh.us/urban/data/to_docs/Springfield_model_userguide.doc. Figure 2 shows the directory structure or model run location. Due to the number of files and complexity, travel demand model run details have not been included in this technical memo.

Figure 2 – CCS-TCC Travel Demand Model Run Directory Structure

Networks

Both CCS-TCC and MVRPC’s modeled networks accurately reflect projects in their respective TIPs and 2040 Long Range Transportation Plans. Project lists can be found online as listed below:

CCSTCChttp://www.clarktcc.com/LRP/2016LRP_Project%20List.pdf

MVRPC

https://www.mvrpc.org/sites/default/files/lrp2016-2016ProjectInventoryList.pdf

Land use and Socio-Economic Data

Both CCSTCC and MVRPC’s socio-economic model variables reflect the current and expected future regional land uses.

MVRPC’s socio-economic variables were developed for the May 2012 2040 LRTP Update and are based on 2010 Census variables. Because the population projections differ from the most current ODSA projections, the use of this socio-economic data set was vetted through the interagency consultation process in May 2015.

On the employment side, adjustments were made primarily to account for manufacturing job loses between 2000 and 2010, recognizing that the local economy is moving away from a manufacturing base and to account for known planned development efforts.

Independent variables are available for 2 analysis years (2010 and 2040) and the travel demand model has the ability of interpolating data for any year between available data sets. A summary of MVRPC’s socio-economic data is available in Table 2. As can be seen from the table, population, households, and employment are expected to make modest gains between 2010 and 2040. Both households and employment are expected to decline in the older urban areas of the region as the trend to develop in the suburban fringes and rural areas continues.

Table 2 – MVRPC Socio-Economic Variables

VariableArea Type

CBD Urban Suburban Rural Total# of TAZs 65 209 413 130 817Acres 880 30,675 297,967 495,879 825,4012010 Census Population - - - - 799,2322010 Households 2,151 77,584 220,039 27,856 327,6302010 Employment 28,042 94,306 303,504 15,541 441,3932040 Population - - - - 820,2272040 Households 2,280 70,336 229,678 32,550 334,8442040 Employment 29,653 87,835 329,415 16,730 463,6332010 Persons per Household 1.35 2.30 2.37 2.61 2.372010 Workers per Household 0.70 1.11 1.24 1.39 1.222010 Autos per Household 0.77 1.44 1.83 2.27 1.77

Note: Includes Greene, Miami, and Montgomery Counties.

CCSTCC's socio-economic variables were developed for the 2040 Plan based on the 2010Census variables, 2010 employment from QCEW, and 2040 population projections from the Ohio Development Services Agency. Projections were updated for the 2016 Plan update based on 2010 census results and known employment changes including: school enrollment, hotels, educational and recreational employment, and area type. Independent variables (land use/socio-economic data) as provided by CCSTCC are available for 2010 and 2040 and all other years are interpolated.

Table 3 shows a summary of CCSTCC’s socio-economic data. This summary shows a slight decrease in population and modest increases in households and employment.

Table 3 – CCSTCC Socio-Economic Variables

VMT Trends

Figure 3 shows Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) trends for each of the analysis years 2018- 2040for the MVRPC and CCS-TCC areas. These values represent un-factored travel demand model output. MVRPC includes the entire MPO area. For ozone runs, model VMT is factored to represent an average summer day using a seasonal factor of 1.08.

Area Type (2010)CBD Urban Suburban Rural Total

# of TAZs 9 70 120 126 3252010

Population1,835 20,764 61,942 53,793 138,334

2010Households

682 7,901 25,219 21,444 55,246

2010Employment

3,272 9,975 32,464 16,451 62,162

Area Type (2040)CBD Urban Suburban Rural Total

# of TAZs 10 70 118 127 3252040

Population2,705 18,676 55,557 51,639 128,577

2040Households

1,116 8,485 25,082 21,359 56,042

2040Employment

2,816 13,847 30,910 18,695 66,268

21,19522,713

24,559

4,454 4,853 5,249

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

2020 2025 2030 2035 2040

Vehi

cle

Mile

s Tra

vele

d (1

,000

s)

Analysis Year

MVRPC

CCS-TCC

Figure 3 – Dayton/Springfield Region VMT Trends

3. Emission Factor Generation

Using MOVES, emission factor files were generated for years 2020, 2030, and 2040, representing the programs being implemented in the D/S Region and using the same assumptions that were agreed upon via interagency consultation for the ozone SIP. Future year scenarios assume no I/M since the program was terminated in 2005. Future year scenarios address removal of low RVP gas requirement (7.8) in summer months to address April 7, 2017 Rule, 82 FR 16932. Tables 4-14 illustrate input and output files using year 2005 as an example.

Technical Details

Table 4 summarizes the settings used in the MOVES run specification file and the MOVES County-Data Manager. Further details in specific inputs that are not using default values are provided below.

Table 4 – MOVES Inputs – OzoneRunSpec Parameter Settings

MOVES Version MOVES2014aScale Custom DomainMOVES Modeling Technique Emission Factor Method

Rates per Profile (grams/vehicle)Rates per Distance (grams/mile)Rates per Vehicle (grams/vehicle)

Time Span Time Aggregation: Hour1 Month representing average summer temperaturesAll hours of day selected16 speed binsWeekdays only

Geographic Bounds Clark, Greene, Miami, and Montgomery CountiesVehicles/Equipment All source types, gasoline and diesel Road Type All road types including off-networkPollutants and Processes Total Gaseous Hydrocarbons, Non-Methane Hydrocarbons,

Volitile Organic Compounds, NOx, NO, NO2, Total EnergyConsumption

Strategies Default values with assumed CNG buses removedGeneral Output Units = grams, joules and milesOutput Emissions Time = hour, Location = custom area, on-road emission rates by

road type and source use type.Advance Performance None

County Data Manager SourcesSource Type Population Combination of local and default data

Local data (2010) ODOT from motor vehicle registration Default data used for source types 41, 51, 54, 61, and 62Future year growth rate based on MPO model Household

growth rate.Vehicle Type VMT Combination of local and default data

HPMSVTypeYear VMT = daily VMT from travel demand model monthVMTFraction = defaultdayVMTFraction=defaulthourVMTFraction=local

I/M Program I/M program information applied for 2002/2005 where applicable for all counties except Miami (Miami Co. is never had an I/M program)

Fuel Formulation DefaultFuel Supply DefaultMetereology Data Local data obtained from NOAA National Climatic Data Center.

Data will consist of monthly high and low temperatures and daily relative humidity for 2002.

Ramp Fraction Using the base year travel demand model for VHT fractions. Future fractions will be assumed constant

Road Type Distribution Use ODOT county summary VMT categorized by federal functional classes

Age Distribution Combination of local and default data.Local data (2010) ODOT from motor vehicle registrationDefault data used for source types 41, 51, 54, 61, and 62The same age distribution will be used for all analysis years

Average Speed Distribution DefaultAlternative Fuel Type Default

Temperature and Relative Humidity

Temperatures are representative of 2002 based on NOAA data from the National Climate Data Center website. Data for Wright Patterson AFB was used because it was the most complete compared to other airports in the non-attainment area. For the ozone runs the average July hourly temperature was used. To get the correct format for MOVES, the data was entered into a spreadsheet provided by EPA which was designed to convert Mobile6 data to MOVES. Representative hourly temperatures and relative humidity distribution profiles can be seen in Table 5.

Table 5 – Temperature and Relative Humidity DataOzone

HourAverage

TemperatureAverage

Relative Humidity1 71.3367 782 70.0883 783 69.1075 804 68.3942 815 67.8592 836 67.2350 857 66.7000 818 67.1458 769 69.8208 6910 74.1008 6311 78.4700 5812 82.2150 5413 85.5142 5014 87.2975 4815 87.9217 4716 88.1000 4617 87.6542 4718 86.4058 5019 84.2658 5420 81.5017 6021 78.7375 6622 76.3300 7023 74.6358 7124 72.9417 76

Ramp Fraction

Ramp fractions were derived using the base year travel demand model VHT fractions. Ramp fractions can be seen in Table 6. Base year fractions were assumed to apply to future years.

Table 6 – Ramp FractionsroadTypeID roadDesc rampFraction

2 Rural Restricted Access 0.044 Urban Restricted Access 0.11

Source Type Population

Source type population is based on a combination of local and MOVES default data. Local data was provided by ODOT based on 2010 motor vehicle registration. Default data is used for source types 41, 51, 54, 61, and 62. Future year growth rate is based on MPO model household growth rate which is 0% in MVRPC. In Clark County cars are an independent variable to the travel demand model. The base year (2000) and the LP year (2040) are used to interpolate the number of cars for the needed analysis years in Clark County. Table 7 shows source type population for the analyzed counties in 2005. In the ozone calculations, the vehicle population isadjusted from average number of vehicles to the number of vehicles in a summer day. In the absence of data, a 1.08 factor, as agreed via interagency consultation and the same as for VMT is used.

Table 7 – Source Type Population for year 2005sourceTypeID sourceTypeName Clark Greene Miami Montgomery

11 MotorCycle 8,341 9,014 7,967 25,09621 Passenger Car 96,932 105,808 71,041 395,92531 Passenger Truck 44,885 53,557 37,861 172,42532 Light Commercial Truck 1,129 1,235 698 4,61441 Intercity Bus 71 52 47 17842 Transit Bus 17 14 7 6643 School Bus 256 356 245 1,18751 Refuse truck 44 36 28 13852 Single Unit Short-haul Truck 68 46 26 11953 Single Unit Long-haul Truck 133 124 238 16954 Motor Home 214 172 136 66561 Comb Short-haul Truck 877 478 443 1,78962 Comb Long-haul Truck 1,009 550 510 2,058

I/M Program

The I/M program was turned “off” for analyses years after 2005.

Vehicle Age Distribution

Vehicle age distribution information was derived using Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicle registration data for year 2010. The data was given to OEPA who supplied a VIN decoder that allowed ODOT to create correctly formatted MOVES inputs. MOVES default data is used for source types 41, 51, 54, 61, and 62. The registration data for all three counties in the non-attainment area were combined to create a regional vehicle age distribution file, see Table 8. The same age distribution will be used for all analysis years

Table 8 – Vehicle Age Distributionyearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction2005 11 0 0.0018 21 17 0.0364 32 3 0.07082005 11 1 0.0214 21 18 0.0330 32 4 0.06782005 11 2 0.0551 21 19 0.0256 32 5 0.03412005 11 3 0.0702 21 20 0.0211 32 6 0.02682005 11 4 0.0831 21 21 0.0174 32 7 0.03302005 11 5 0.0782 21 22 0.0133 32 8 0.03322005 11 6 0.0617 21 23 0.0098 32 9 0.03672005 11 7 0.0775 21 24 0.0087 32 10 0.04972005 11 8 0.0569 21 25 0.0067 32 11 0.05252005 11 9 0.0506 21 26 0.0051 32 12 0.04062005 11 10 0.0429 21 27 0.0026 32 13 0.04112005 11 11 0.0328 21 28 0.0016 32 14 0.03482005 11 12 0.0241 21 29 0.0015 32 15 0.07452005 11 13 0.0205 21 30 0.0444 32 16 0.05262005 11 14 0.0215 31 0 0.0062 32 17 0.04082005 11 15 0.0164 31 1 0.0255 32 18 0.03542005 11 16 0.0136 31 2 0.0463 32 19 0.02672005 11 17 0.0124 31 3 0.0558 32 20 0.02152005 11 18 0.0089 31 4 0.0650 32 21 0.02452005 11 19 0.0082 31 5 0.0782 32 22 0.01562005 11 20 0.0079 31 6 0.0722 32 23 0.01352005 11 21 0.0086 31 7 0.0708 32 24 0.01022005 11 22 0.0091 31 8 0.0674 32 25 0.01072005 11 23 0.0125 31 9 0.0545 32 26 0.00662005 11 24 0.0186 31 10 0.0579 32 27 0.00392005 11 25 0.0172 31 11 0.0569 32 28 0.00142005 11 26 0.0147 31 12 0.0507 32 29 0.0007

yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction2005 11 27 0.0169 31 13 0.0452 32 30 0.00942005 11 28 0.0249 31 14 0.0407 41 0 0.00002005 11 29 0.0168 31 15 0.0424 41 1 0.02822005 11 30 0.0950 31 16 0.0350 41 2 0.04662005 21 0 0.0063 31 17 0.0298 41 3 0.07912005 21 1 0.0237 31 18 0.0215 41 4 0.08192005 21 2 0.0347 31 19 0.0166 41 5 0.08192005 21 3 0.0428 31 20 0.0123 41 6 0.06362005 21 4 0.0439 31 21 0.0114 41 7 0.07342005 21 5 0.0478 31 22 0.0096 41 8 0.03812005 21 6 0.0504 31 23 0.0072 41 9 0.06782005 21 7 0.0527 31 24 0.0057 41 10 0.06642005 21 8 0.0548 31 25 0.0038 41 11 0.04382005 21 9 0.0523 31 26 0.0026 41 12 0.02972005 21 10 0.0571 31 27 0.0016 41 13 0.02262005 21 11 0.0570 31 28 0.0006 41 14 0.02122005 21 12 0.0519 31 29 0.0004 41 15 0.04802005 21 13 0.0518 31 30 0.0062 41 16 0.03672005 21 14 0.0489 32 0 0.0063 41 17 0.01552005 21 15 0.0535 32 1 0.0418 41 18 0.00712005 21 16 0.0432 32 2 0.0828 41 19 0.03532005 41 20 0.0226 43 6 0.0595 51 23 0.00862005 41 21 0.0056 43 7 0.0584 51 24 0.00862005 41 22 0.0056 43 8 0.0623 51 25 0.00002005 41 23 0.0071 43 9 0.0639 51 26 0.00862005 41 24 0.0085 43 10 0.0611 51 27 0.00432005 41 25 0.0155 43 11 0.0823 51 28 0.00002005 41 26 0.0127 43 12 0.0656 51 29 0.00002005 41 27 0.0014 43 13 0.0506 51 30 0.03852005 41 28 0.0056 43 14 0.0183 52 0 0.00432005 41 29 0.0042 43 15 0.0222 52 1 0.03432005 41 30 0.0243 43 16 0.0183 52 2 0.03432005 42 0 0.0103 43 17 0.0167 52 3 0.11592005 42 1 0.0000 43 18 0.0178 52 4 0.07302005 42 2 0.0515 43 19 0.0178 52 5 0.04722005 42 3 0.0412 43 20 0.0167 52 6 0.04722005 42 4 0.0309 43 21 0.0156 52 7 0.08152005 42 5 0.0928 43 22 0.0117 52 8 0.13732005 42 6 0.0309 43 23 0.0133 52 9 0.04292005 42 7 0.0412 43 24 0.0117 52 10 0.03862005 42 8 0.0412 43 25 0.0078 52 11 0.0472

yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction2005 42 9 0.1237 43 26 0.0044 52 12 0.03862005 42 10 0.0412 43 27 0.0061 52 13 0.03432005 42 11 0.0412 43 28 0.0006 52 14 0.01292005 42 12 0.0515 43 29 0.0028 52 15 0.02582005 42 13 0.0515 43 30 0.0093 52 16 0.02582005 42 14 0.0515 51 0 0.0043 52 17 0.01722005 42 15 0.0412 51 1 0.0343 52 18 0.02582005 42 16 0.0412 51 2 0.0343 52 19 0.02582005 42 17 0.0103 51 3 0.1159 52 20 0.01292005 42 18 0.0412 51 4 0.0730 52 21 0.00432005 42 19 0.0515 51 5 0.0472 52 22 0.00432005 42 20 0.0206 51 6 0.0472 52 23 0.00862005 42 21 0.0000 51 7 0.0815 52 24 0.00862005 42 22 0.0309 51 8 0.1373 52 25 0.00002005 42 23 0.0103 51 9 0.0429 52 26 0.00862005 42 24 0.0106 51 10 0.0386 52 27 0.00432005 42 25 0.0103 51 11 0.0472 52 28 0.00002005 42 26 0.0103 51 12 0.0386 52 29 0.00002005 42 27 0.0000 51 13 0.0343 52 30 0.03852005 42 28 0.0103 51 14 0.0129 53 0 0.00432005 42 29 0.0000 51 15 0.0258 53 1 0.03432005 42 30 0.0107 51 16 0.0258 53 2 0.03432005 43 0 0.0534 51 17 0.0172 53 3 0.11592005 43 1 0.0361 51 18 0.0258 53 4 0.07302005 43 2 0.0400 51 19 0.0258 53 5 0.04722005 43 3 0.0539 51 20 0.0129 53 6 0.04722005 43 4 0.0523 51 21 0.0043 53 7 0.08152005 43 5 0.0495 51 22 0.0043 53 8 0.13732005 53 10 0.0386 54 26 0.0226 62 11 0.07162005 53 11 0.0472 54 27 0.0151 62 12 0.05082005 53 12 0.0386 54 28 0.0108 62 13 0.03392005 53 13 0.0343 54 29 0.0064 62 14 0.03292005 53 14 0.0129 54 30 0.1363 62 15 0.02772005 53 15 0.0258 61 0 0.0015 62 16 0.01952005 53 16 0.0258 61 1 0.0124 62 17 0.01022005 53 17 0.0172 61 2 0.0270 62 18 0.00802005 53 18 0.0258 61 3 0.0335 62 19 0.00522005 53 19 0.0258 61 4 0.0436 62 20 0.00582005 53 20 0.0129 61 5 0.0460 62 21 0.00562005 53 21 0.0043 61 6 0.0550 62 22 0.00262005 53 22 0.0043 61 7 0.0601 62 23 0.0009

yearid sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction sourcetypeid ageid ageFraction2005 53 23 0.0086 61 8 0.0536 62 24 0.00172005 53 24 0.0086 61 9 0.0496 62 25 0.00172005 53 25 0.0000 61 10 0.0533 62 26 0.00132005 53 26 0.0086 61 11 0.0527 62 27 0.00022005 53 27 0.0043 61 12 0.0453 62 28 0.00042005 53 28 0.0000 61 13 0.0489 62 29 0.00022005 53 29 0.0000 61 14 0.0407 62 30 0.00132005 53 30 0.0385 61 15 0.04392005 54 0 0.0048 61 16 0.04432005 54 1 0.0148 61 17 0.03152005 54 2 0.0268 61 18 0.03072005 54 3 0.0365 61 19 0.02822005 54 4 0.0423 61 20 0.02372005 54 5 0.0482 61 21 0.02732005 54 6 0.0504 61 22 0.02782005 54 7 0.0431 61 23 0.01792005 54 8 0.0413 61 24 0.01832005 54 9 0.0418 61 25 0.01302005 54 10 0.0499 61 26 0.00962005 54 11 0.0487 61 27 0.00562005 54 12 0.0454 61 28 0.00462005 54 13 0.0336 61 29 0.00342005 54 14 0.0355 61 30 0.04702005 54 15 0.0381 62 0 0.00452005 54 16 0.0292 62 1 0.04482005 54 17 0.0235 62 2 0.00742005 54 18 0.0171 62 3 0.10622005 54 19 0.0148 62 4 0.10882005 54 20 0.0169 62 5 0.15572005 54 21 0.0209 62 6 0.06922005 54 22 0.0234 62 7 0.04242005 54 23 0.0230 62 8 0.04782005 54 24 0.0200 62 9 0.05042005 54 25 0.0188 62 10 0.0813

Road Type Distribution

Road type distribution is based on the 2008 ODOT, county summary, HPMS VMT data categorized by federal functional class for the three county non-attainment area. Road type distribution can be seen in Table 9.

Table 9 – Road Type DistributionsourceTypeID roadTypeID roadTypeVMTFraction sourceTypeID roadTypeID roadTypeVMTFraction

11 1 0 43 4 0.2911 2 0.06 43 5 0.5211 3 0.13 51 1 011 4 0.29 51 2 0.0611 5 0.52 51 3 0.1321 1 0 51 4 0.2921 2 0.06 51 5 0.5221 3 0.13 52 1 021 4 0.29 52 2 0.0621 5 0.52 52 3 0.1331 1 0 52 4 0.2931 2 0.06 52 5 0.5231 3 0.13 53 1 031 4 0.29 53 2 0.0631 5 0.52 53 3 0.1332 1 0 53 4 0.2932 2 0.06 53 5 0.5232 3 0.13 54 1 032 4 0.29 54 2 0.0632 5 0.52 54 3 0.1341 1 0 54 4 0.2941 2 0.06 54 5 0.5241 3 0.13 61 1 041 4 0.29 61 2 0.0641 5 0.52 61 3 0.1342 1 0 61 4 0.2942 2 0.06 61 5 0.5242 3 0.13 62 1 042 4 0.29 62 2 0.0642 5 0.52 62 3 0.1343 1 0 62 4 0.2943 2 0.06 62 5 0.5243 3 0.13

Vehicle Type VMT and VMT Fractions

The first component of the VMT inputs is the Yearly HPMS VMT, but the travel demand model was used instead of ODOT’s HMPS data since it was felt that the model would better predict future year VMT. ODOT’s CMS post-processor was run for each year to generate congestion reports, which includes total daily VMT. The vehicle type percentages of the total VMT were based on ODOT’s weigh-in-motion (WIM) data. Since there are not enough WIM stations for lower class facilties in the non-attainment area, a statewide average of all ODOT WIM data collectors was used. Daily VMT was then converted to yearly. Yearly HPMS VMT for 2005 can be seen in Table 10. The same method was to generate all other analysis years

Table 10 – Yearly HPMS VMT for 2005HPMSVtypeID yearID HPMSBaseYearVMT baseYearOffNetVMT

10 2005 30590102 020 2005 5455503318 030 2005 1683283544 040 2005 17205399 050 2005 127192033 060 2005 301977250 0

Monthly and daily VMT fractions used MOVES default data. The hourly VMT fractions were derived from ODOT WIM data. Hourly VMT fractions vary for each of the five MOVES road types but do not change for each of the 16 MOVES source types. A representative sample of the hour VMT fraction input file can be seen in Table 11, the entire file is too large to include in this document.

Table 11 – Hourly VMT FractionssourceTypeID roadTypeID dayID hourID hourVMTFraction

11 1 2 1 0.008911 1 2 2 0.0056411 1 2 3 0.0042411 1 2 4 0.0042711 1 2 5 0.0069511 1 2 6 0.0179811 1 2 7 0.0380611 1 2 8 0.05711 1 2 9 0.0577311 1 2 10 0.0553811 1 2 11 0.0555411 1 2 12 0.0555811 1 2 13 0.0558411 1 2 14 0.06051

sourceTypeID roadTypeID dayID hourID hourVMTFraction11 1 2 15 0.0676511 1 2 16 0.0775511 1 2 17 0.0842811 1 2 18 0.079711 1 2 19 0.0601211 1 2 20 0.0452211 1 2 21 0.0364611 1 2 22 0.0291211 1 2 23 0.0214211 1 2 24 0.01486

11 2 2 1 0.008911 2 2 2 0.0056411 2 2 3 0.0042411 2 2 4 0.0042711 2 2 5 0.0069511 2 2 6 0.0179811 2 2 7 0.0380611 2 2 8 0.05711 2 2 9 0.0577311 2 2 10 0.0553811 2 2 11 0.0555411 2 2 12 0.0555811 2 2 13 0.0558411 2 2 14 0.0605111 2 2 15 0.0676511 2 2 16 0.0775511 2 2 17 0.0842811 2 2 18 0.079711 2 2 19 0.0601211 2 2 20 0.0452211 2 2 21 0.0364611 2 2 22 0.0291211 2 2 23 0.0214211 2 2 24 0.01486

11 3 2 1 0.0065511 3 2 2 0.003711 3 2 3 0.0030411 3 2 4 0.00363

sourceTypeID roadTypeID dayID hourID hourVMTFraction11 3 2 5 0.0079211 3 2 6 0.0234311 3 2 7 0.0489911 3 2 8 0.0631911 3 2 9 0.0540211 3 2 10 0.0512111 3 2 11 0.052811 3 2 12 0.0560811 3 2 13 0.0581411 3 2 14 0.0587511 3 2 15 0.0667611 3 2 16 0.0781211 3 2 17 0.0846911 3 2 18 0.0815211 3 2 19 0.0585211 3 2 20 0.0434311 3 2 21 0.0360611 3 2 22 0.0282911 3 2 23 0.0188311 3 2 24 0.01233

11 4 2 1 0.0075211 4 2 2 0.004411 4 2 3 0.0035411 4 2 4 0.0037411 4 2 5 0.0070511 4 2 6 0.0212311 4 2 7 0.05411 4 2 8 0.076811 4 2 9 0.0654511 4 2 10 0.0511411 4 2 11 0.0469211 4 2 12 0.0491611 4 2 13 0.0511211 4 2 14 0.053411 4 2 15 0.0610511 4 2 16 0.0742111 4 2 17 0.0832111 4 2 18 0.0838511 4 2 19 0.06062

sourceTypeID roadTypeID dayID hourID hourVMTFraction11 4 2 20 0.0422911 4 2 21 0.0344211 4 2 22 0.029211 4 2 23 0.0213711 4 2 24 0.01431

11 5 2 1 0.0067811 5 2 2 0.0037811 5 2 3 0.0029511 5 2 4 0.002911 5 2 5 0.0049811 5 2 6 0.0142211 5 2 7 0.0344911 5 2 8 0.0572811 5 2 9 0.0543511 5 2 10 0.0499111 5 2 11 0.0526111 5 2 12 0.0609811 5 2 13 0.0645711 5 2 14 0.0638711 5 2 15 0.0681211 5 2 16 0.0767211 5 2 17 0.0827411 5 2 18 0.0828411 5 2 19 0.0634411 5 2 20 0.0486611 5 2 21 0.040711 5 2 22 0.0308311 5 2 23 0.0196611 5 2 24 0.01262

Output Emission Factors

Table 12 shows the first record in a MOVES sample output (rate per distance) emission file for ozone. For any given month, day of week, hour of the day, pollutant, and process; the rate per distance varies by road type, and speed bin. Rates per distance emissions are applied to link and intrazonal VMT.

Table 12 – Sample Emission File (Rate per Distance) – OzoneHeading: MOVESScenarioID MOVESRunID yearID monthID dayID hourID

Record: 2005 7 5 1Heading: linkID pollutantID processID sourceTypeID SCC fuelTypeID

Record: 87 0 1 0Heading: modelYearID roadTypeID avgSpeedBinID temperature relHumidity ratePerDistance

Record: 0 2 1 6.90740776

Table 13 shows the first record in a MOVES sample output (rate per vehicle) emission file and ozone. The rate per vehicle varies for any combinations of month, day of week, hour of the day, pollutant, and process. Rates per vehicle emissions are applied to the vehicle source type population.

Table 13 – Sample Emission File (Rate per Vehicle) – OzoneHeading: MOVESScenarioID MOVESRunID yearID monthID dayID

Record: 2005 7 5Heading: hourID zoneID pollutantID processID sourceTypeID

Record: 1 87 1Heading: SCC fuelTypeID modelYearID temperature ratePerVehicle

Record: 0 0 0.27257887

Table 14 shows the first record in a MOVES sample output (rate per profile) emission. The rate per vehicle varies for any combinations of month, day of week, hour of the day, pollutant, and process. Rates per profile emissions are applied to the vehicle souce type population for ozone runs only.

Table 14 – Sample Emission File (Rate per Profile) – OzoneHeading: MOVESScenarioID MOVESRunID yearID monthID dayID

Record: 2005 0 5Heading: hourID zoneID pollutantID processID sourceTypeID

Record: 1 87 0 1Heading: SCC fuelTypeID modelYearID temperature ratePerVehicle

Record: 0 0 0.01774139

4. Post Processing

Total emissions were computed with the aid of several custom programs by ODOT. The processuses data on daily and directional traffic distributions as well as more up to date volume/delay functions from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). This process, described below and illustrated in Figure 4, also uses rewritten code able to handle the newer model network formatsand MOVES generated emission factors.

The first step in the the process involves running postcms.exe to calculate hourly link volumes based on the percentage of the daily volume (travel demand model output) determined by a link’s facility and area type. Link speeds from the travel demand model are not used in the analysis. The speeds are estimated as a post-process to the model based on HCM methods using a link’s volume-to-capacity ratio and link group code. The daily to hourly volume conversion percentages and speed tables can be seen in Appendix B.1.

The second step (mmoves.exe) uses a combination of the MOVES emission factors and the hourly link volumes that are output of the postcms.exe program. The hourly volumes are multiplied by the MOVES emission factor for the corresponding hour of day, speed bin, and roadtype to calculate emissions for every network link for each hour. The final link on road vehicle emissions for the area is the sum of all individual link-hour emissions.

The third step, (vehcalm.exe), calculates vehicle-based emissions for each source type for each hour of the day. The vehicle source type is based on a combination of local and default data. The final vehicle emissions for each county are the sum of all individual hourly emissions for all vehicle types.

Intrazonal trips do not get loaded onto the network, so the fourth step in the process requires a separate method to account for those trips that use local roads to travel within a zone. The intracalm.exe program uses intrazonal trips to estimate VMT using the area in square miles and intrazonal trips of each zone. The zone is assumed circular and the radius of the circle is used as the average trip length for these intrazonal trips. Intrazonal emissions are then calculated by combining MOVES generated emissions with estimated intrazonal VMT. The emission rates are the same as those used to calculated link based emissions.

The final step is to summarize link, vehicle, and intrazonal emissions for each county, pollutant, and analyzed year. Daily summary emissions for each pollutant, county, and scenario year in the Dayton Springfield Region can be found in Appendix B.2 for ozone.

Figure 4 – Emission Calculation Process

5. Multiple MPO Coordination Issues

CCS-TCC, MVRPC, ODOT, and OEPA have a long history of working together in air quality issues, the Memorandum of Understanding, listed below, documents these working relationships.

Memorandum of Understanding among the MVRPC, the CCS-TCC, the OKI Regional Council of Governments, the OEPA, the ODOT, the U.S. EPA-Region 5, the FHWA-Ohio Division, and the FTA-Region 5. The final memorandum was signed by all parties and completed on July 2014.

Appendix A

Interagency Consultation Documentation

Dayton/Springfield2040 Transportation Plan Conformity Analysis Summary

The Dayton and Springfield MPOs (Dayton & Springfield, OH urbanized areas) are initiating a new conformity analysis/determination for their existing 2040 Transportation Plans and 2018 – 2021 Transportation Improvement Program. This new conformity process is in response to FHWA’s April 23, 2018 guidance requiring conformity analyses for “orphaned” US EPA 1997 Ozone standard areas.

Interagency consultation topics Latest planning assumptions –

o MVRPC: Modeling, networks, and variables consistent with the 2016 Update of the Long Range Transportation Plan except amendments noted below.

o CCS-TCC: Modeling, networks, and variables consistent with the 2016 Update of the Long Range Transportation Plan except amendments noted below.

Latest emission modeling o Conformity analyses will utilize MOVES2014a and address removal of low RVP

gas requirement (7.8) in summer months to address April 7, 2017 rule, 82 FR 16932.

Conformity tests – 1997 Ozone SIP budgets tests Analyzed, regionally significant projects list –

o MVRPC: 2016 LRTP adopted projects including 5 projects that need amendments to account for changes in scope, feasibility, or cost and 1 new project (432A)(see link below and attached). https://www.mvrpc.org/sites/default/files/lrp2016-2016ProjectInventoryList.pdf

o CCS-TCC: 2016 LRTP adopted projects and 1 new project, PID 104833. PID 104833 is a Road Diet project that will reduce the number of through lanes from 4 to 3, add a center 2-way left-turn lane, and on-road bike lanes. CCS-TCC is requesting this PID be considered Exempt from conformity under 40 CFR 93.126, Table 2, Exempt Projects as a "Project(s) that (will) correct, improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature."

Conformity Analysis/Determination schedule (Tentative Dates, assuming no budget revision needed)

o AQ conformity runs – June 1, 2018 o Final Dayton-Springfield Conformity documentation recording emissions

analysis methodology and results. – June 15, 2018 o Public Involvement effort to review conformity results –

MVRPC: Aug. 15 (Comment Period July 26 to Aug 24) CCS-TCC: September 11 (Comment Period Aug 28 to September 25

o MVRPC and CCS-TCC Plan/2018 – 2021 TIP Conformity determination – MVRPC: Board Adoption September 6, 2018 CCS-TCC: Board Adoption October 12, 2018

8-Hour Ozone Attainment/SIP status:

1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard Maintenance Area Dayton-Springfield 1997 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan Revision to Approved Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets Oct 24, 2013 78 FR 63388

Geography: Clark, Greene, Miami, & Montgomery Counties, Ohio

Conformity Tests: 8-Hour SIP budget tests of MVRPC and CCS-TCC 2040 T-Plans and 2018 – 2021 TIPs analysis year networks

Analysis Years: 2020 – 1st analysis year 2030 – Interim year 2040 – Transportation Plan horizon year

1997 8-Hour Ozone -Tons/DayDayton/Springfield 2018

Budget2020

Emissions2030

Emissions2040

EmissionsVOC 22.35NOx 32.47

INSERT GUIDANCE ON PDF Document

Appendix B

Appendix B.1Post Processing Default Distributions

HOUR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23PCTADTURB FWY 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.3 5.5 6.1 7.2 8.0 7.9 5.8 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.5URB ART 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.3 6.2 6.5 6.4 6.8 7.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.9 1.3RUR FWY 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.7 6.0 6.5 7.1 7.5 7.0 5.6 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0RUR ART 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.8 6.0 6.0 6.7 7.6 8.1 7.7 5.6 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.3PCTADT TRKURB FWY 2.1 1.9 1.8 2.0 2.4 3.0 3.9 4.6 5.3 6.0 6.3 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.3 5.8 5.2 4.6 4.1 3.7 3.4 3.1 2.8 2.4URB ART 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.3 3.9 5.9 6.9 6.7 7.1 7.6 7.4 7.2 7.4 7.2 6.0 5.0 3.7 2.8 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.3RUR FWY 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.6 3.1 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.1 5.6 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.6 5.3 4.9 4.6 4.3 4.0 3.8 3.5 3.1RUR ART 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.6 2.2 3.0 4.2 5.3 6.1 6.7 7.0 7.1 7.0 6.9 6.8 6.3 5.5 4.6 3.8 3.1 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.7PCTDIRURB FWY 38 40 40 46 56 64 70 70 68 62 58 52 52 52 50 46 38 38 46 52 46 42 42 40URB ART 44 46 44 48 54 62 66 68 64 56 54 52 50 50 50 46 40 38 46 52 48 46 46 46RUR FWY 44 46 48 54 60 68 68 64 58 54 52 50 50 52 52 48 42 40 44 48 48 44 46 44RUR ART 40 42 44 48 58 66 72 68 60 56 54 50 50 50 50 46 40 38 46 50 46 44 44 44

LOS E VC 0 0.625 1.25 1.875 2.5 3.125 3.75 4.375 5 5.625 6.25 6.875 7.5 8.125 8.75 9.375 10 10.625 11.25 11.875 12.5 13.125 13.75 14.375SPEEDVCcurve1 75 75 75 75 75 75 74.9 74.8 74.6 74.2 73.5 72.3 70.5 67.8 64.2 59.5 54 47.7 41.2 34.9 28.9 23.7 19.2 15.5curve2 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 69.9 69.8 69.6 69.2 68.4 67.1 65.1 62.2 58.2 53 47 40.5 33.9 27.7 22.2 17.6 13.8curve3 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 64.9 64.8 64.4 63.8 62.6 60.5 57 52 45.4 37.8 29.9 22.7 16.7 12.1 8.6curve4 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.6 59.1 58.2 56.7 54.3 50.8 46.1 40.3 33.8 27.3 21.3 16.2 12.2curve5 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.7 54.3 53.6 52.3 50 46.5 41.5 35.3 28.5 21.9 16.1 11.5curve6 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.7 59.4 59.1 58.5 57.7 56.5 55 53.1 50.7 47.9 44.7 41.1 37.3 33.4curve7 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.9 54.7 54.5 54.2 53.8 53.1 52.2 50.9 49.3 47.3 44.9 42.1 39 35.7 32.2curve8 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.4 49 48.5 47.7 46.7 45.4 43.8 41.8 39.5 36.8 33.9 30.9curve9 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 44.9 44.8 44.7 44.4 44.1 43.6 43 42.1 40.9 39.4 37.6 35.5 33.1 30.5 27.8curve10 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.7 49.4 49 48.4 47.5 46.5 45.1 43.5 41.7 39.6 37.3 34.9 32.4 29.8 27.3 24.9 22.6 20.4curve11 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.7 49.4 48.9 48 46.7 44.9 42.5 39.6 36.2 32.6 28.7 25 21.4 18.2 15.3 12.9 10.8 9curve12 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.1 48.2 46.8 44.5 41.4 37.5 32.9 28 23.1 18.7 14.9 11.8 9.2 7.2 5.7 4.5curve13 40 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.5 39.2 38.6 37.8 36.7 35.3 33.5 31.4 29 26.4 23.7 21.1 18.5 16.1 13.9 12curve14 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.6 39.1 38.5 37.5 36.1 34.3 32.1 29.4 26.5 23.5 20.5 17.7 15.1 12.8 10.7 9 7.6curve15 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.7 39.4 38.8 37.9 36.5 34.7 32.3 29.5 26.4 23.2 20 17 14.3 11.9 9.9 8.2 6.8 5.6curve16 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.8 34.5 34 33.2 32.1 30.5 28.5 26.1 23.5 20.6 17.9 15.2 12.8 10.7 8.9 7.4 6.1 5.1curve17 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.7 34.4 33.9 33.1 32 30.3 28.3 25.8 23.1 20.3 17.5 14.9 12.5 10.4 8.6 7.2 5.9 4.9curve18 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.6 34.2 33.5 32.4 30.9 28.8 26.3 23.4 20.4 17.4 14.6 12.1 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6curve19 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.8 29.5 29 28.2 27.1 25.6 23.7 21.5 19.1 16.6 14.2 12 10 8.3 6.8 5.6 4.6 3.8curve20 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.4 28.9 28.1 26.9 25.3 23.4 21.1 18.6 16.1 13.6 11.4 9.5 7.8 6.4 5.3 4.3 3.6curve21 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.3 28.7 27.7 26.2 24.4 22.1 19.6 17 14.4 12 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6 2.9

VC RATIO TO LOS CONVERSION (VALUE SHOWN IS LOWER LIMIT FOR THAT LOS)(URBAN ROADS USE SPEED BREAKS BELOW FOR LOS DETERMINATION) (ALL USE THE BASE VC'S TO DETERMINE EXCEEDANCE) BASE RUR2 FWY A 0.00 0.00 0.00B 0.30 0.00 0.25C 0.50 0.10 0.40D 0.70 0.30 0.60E 0.90 0.50 0.80F 1.00 1.00 1.00F+ 1.10 1.10 1.10F++ 1.30 1.30 1.30

SPEED VC RATIO BREAKS FOR URBAN STREETS (HIGHEST SPEED FOR GIVEN LOS & FF SPEED)FFS B C D E F>47 42. 34. 27. 21. 16.>37 35. 28. 22. 17. 13.>32 30. 24. 18. 14. 10.<33 25. 19. 13. 9. 7.

LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLD BY AREANUM LOS DEFINITION1 F CINCINNATI,CLEVELAND,COLUMBUS CENTRAL MPO COUNTIES (CUY,FRA,HAM)2 E OTHER TMA MPOS (AKRON,CANTON,DAYTON,TOLEDO,YOUNGSTOWN + NON-CENTRAL COUNTIES FROM 1)3 E OTHER MPOS & PARTS OF AREAS 1 & 2 OUTSIDE URBANIZED AREA4 E RURAL NON MPO COUNTIES

PEAK SPREADING MODEL INFO (SET MAX ITERATIONS TO 0 TO DISABLE PEAK SPREADING)MAX VC RATIO FWY: 1.30MAX VC RATIO ART: 1.30MAX ITERATIONS : 1000

TRUCK PCE: 2.00

AQ SEASON FACTOR: 1.00

MODEL CLASS PARAMETERS (MAX 4 CLASSES, HOURS 0-23 W/ NO OVERLAP IN CLASS, ALLOCATE ENTIRE CLASS AS TRUCK(1) OR NOT(0))CLS TRK 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CLS BEG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CLS END 23 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLS NUM 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Appendix B.2Ozone EmissionSummaries

Clark County Daily Summary

2020 (No I/M)CLARK VOC (tons/day) NOX (tons/day)Link Emissions 0.7359 2.4796Vehicle Emissions 1.9971 0.8981Intrazonal Emissions 0.0033 0.0083

TOTAL 2.7363 3.3860


TOTAL 1.5855 1.5607


TOTAL 1.0976 0.9774

Greene County Daily Summary

2020 (No I/M)GREENE VOC (tons/day) NOX (tons/day)Link Emissions 0.7212 2.3886Vehicle Emissions 2.0628 0.9277Intrazonal Emissions 0.0066 0.0165

TOTAL 2.7906 3.3328


TOTAL 1.5915 1.5158


TOTAL 1.0882 0.9438

Miami County Daily Summary

2020 (No I/M)MIAMI VOC (tons/day) NOX (tons/day)Link Emissions 0.4939 1.6877Vehicle Emissions 1.4348 0.6452Intrazonal Emissions 0.0069 0.0174

TOTAL 1.9356 2.3503


TOTAL 1.1056 1.0734


TOTAL 0.7568 0.6737

Montgomery County Daily Summary

2020 (No I/M)MONTGOMERY VOC (tons/day) NOX (tons/day)Link Emissions 2.0812 6.8842Vehicle Emissions 7.2725 3.2705Intrazonal Emissions 0.0099 0.0249

TOTAL 9.3636 10.1796


TOTAL 5.2968 4.5106


TOTAL 3.5537 2.7077

RESOLUTION 2018 - P

OF THE CLARK COUNTY-SPRINGFIELD TRANSPORTATION COORDINATING COMMITTEE TO AMEND THE SFY2018-SFY2021 TRANSPORTATION

IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM


WHEREAS, the TCC is responsible for maintaining the area’s Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), in cooperation with local governments, transportation providers, and the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT); and

WHEREAS, CCSTCC and ODOT have made modifications to the programming documents for various projects, which are identified on the attached list, resulting in the need for a SFY2018-SFY2021 TIP amendment; and

WHEREAS, the amendment is consistent with the 2040 Transportation Plan; and

WHEREAS, the amendment will not affect the regional air quality emission analysis of the SFY2018-2021 TIP; and

WHEREAS, the amendment will result in a TIP that is in reasonable fiscal constraint; and

WHEREAS, the next scheduled update of the biennial Transportation Improvement Program is not until SFY2020.


That the members of the Clark County-Springfield Transportation Coordinating Committee approve the amendment to the SFY2018-SFY2021 Transportation Improvement Program as shown on the reverse side of this resolution.

____________________________________

Elmer M. BeardChairmanSeptember 14, 2018

RESOLUTION 2018-P2018-2021 Transportation Improvement Program

Sour

ce

Typ

e

Pha

se/

Sub

Pha

se

SFY

Am

oun

t

89441 CLA-New Carlisle Trail Signs 4 F M-TA PO 2018 0 E X 9/5/2013 None None NoneO L PO 2018 0 Clear

104815 CLA-Yellow Springs St Resurf 1,071 F M-STP PE DD 2018 0 E X X X 1/2/2020 5/2/2020 8/2/2020 10/2/2020S S PE DD 2018 0F M-STP CO CC 2021 0O L CO CC 2021 0F M-STP CO CE 2021 0O L CO CE 2021 0

108617 260 F HSIP PE DD 2021 22 E L X X X 1/1/2020 None 5/1/2020 7/1/2020F HSIP PE PD 2019 28S LABR PE PD 2018 1F HSIP RW AC 2021 20S LABR RW SVC 2018 20F HSIP CO CC 2021 255O L CO CE 2021 5

Install new trail signage on the Tecumseh Trail

Replace existing signal supports with mast arms. Upgrade signal heads to 12" w/back plates. Add PED heads and pushbuttons, railroad preemption.

CLA-Main/Western Signal Upgrade

ML

Project is cancelled

Project is cancelled

Reg

iona

lly S

igni

fica

nt

PIDCounty-Route-Section/

Location/Termini/Description Air

Qua

lity

Tota

l Co

nstru

ctio

n C

ost

(Th

ous

and

s)

TIP Funding

Resurface roadway and add ADA ramps on Yellow Springs St from Main St to Fair St

ML

Env Doc Complete

Local Let PS&E to DistrictSy

stem

Pre

serv

atio

n

Sale AwardFisc

ally

Ba

lanc

ed

Safe

ty &

Sec

urity

Eco

nom

ic V

italit

y

LPA

No

n-Tr

ad

itio

nal

Co

nges

tion

Miti

ga

tion

Futu

re C

ons

truct

ion

EJ T

arg

et A

rea

RESOLUTION 2018 - Q

OF THE CLARK COUNTY–SPRINGFIELD TRANSPORTATION COORDINATING COMMITTEE TO SUPPORT THE ESTABLISH TARGETS FOR TRANSIT ASSET

MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE MEASURES


WHEREAS, 49 CFR 625 requires Transit Providers and MPO’s to establish targets for fourtransit asset management performance measures applicable to the state of good repair for equipment, rolling stock, infrastructure, and facilities; and

WHEREAS, the performance measures are required to foster transparency and accountability, and help track the state of good repair of transit assets at regional, state, and national levels;and

WHEREAS, CCSTCC has coordinated with the City of Springfield, acting as the public transit operator, and ODOT to cooperatively establish transit asset management performance targets for the state of good repair for equipment, rolling stock, and facilities; and

WHEREAS, MPO’s must establish targets for their respective planning areas within 180 days of the transit operator’s establishment of targets; and

WHEREAS, the City of Springfield’s targets for years 2019-2023 are shown on the reverse side of this resolution; and

WHEREAS, CCSTCC agrees to plan and program projects that contribute toward the accomplishment of the state of good repair target for each performance measure.


That the members of the Clark County –Springfield Transportation Coordinating Committee hereby establish the targets as shown on the reverse side of this resolution for the transit asset management performance measures for years 2019-2023.

_____________________________


September 14, 2018

RESOLUTION 2018 – R

OF THE CLARK COUNTY-SPRINGFIELD TRANSPORTATIONCOORDINATING COMMITTEE TO AMEND THE2040 LONG RANGE TRANSPORATION PLAN


WHEREAS, the CCSTCC is responsible for maintaining the area’s Long Range Transportation Plan, in cooperation with local governments, transportation providers, and the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT); and

WHEREAS, the CCSTCC adopted its current 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan in May 2016; and

WHEREAS, 23 CFR 450.324(f) requires that the metropolitan transportation plan include a description of the performance measures and performance targets described in 23 CFR 450.306(d); and

WHEREAS, the CCSTCC adopted transit asset management performance management targets for the four performance measures outlined in the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act for 2018 in July 2018 via Resolution 2018-Q; and

WHEREAS, the CCSTCC affirms that it will plan, program, and fund projects that have a positive impact in achieving the targets; and

WHEREAS, the amendment does not affect the 2040 Long Range Plan’s current Air Quality conformity determination; and

WHEREAS, the amendment was available to the public for comment following the CCSTCC Public Participation Plan.


That the members of the Clark County-Springfield Transportation Coordinating Committeeapprove the amendment to the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan as attached.

_____________________________

Elmer BeardChairman

September 14, 2018

2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Performance Based Planning Transit Asset Management Performance Measures In July 2018, CCSTCC’s Board adopted Resolution 2018-Q establishing transit asset management performance targets for the four performance measures outlined in the FAST Act. The targets are as follows:

To aid in meeting those targets in the Clark County-Springfield region, CCSTCC continues to plan, program, and fund projects that have a positive impact in achieving the targets outlined in the Springfield City Area Transit’s Transit Asset Management Plan.

RESOLUTION 2018 - S

OF THE CLARK COUNTY-SPRINGFIELD TRANSPORTATION COORDINATING COMMITTEE TO AMEND THE SFY2018-SFY2021 TRANSPORTATION

IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM


WHEREAS, the CCSTCC is responsible for maintaining the area’s Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), in cooperation with local governments, transportation providers, and the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT); and

WHEREAS, 23 CFR 450.326(d) requires that the TIP include a description of the anticipated effect of the TIP toward achieving the performance targets identified in the metropolitan transportation plan, linking investment priorities to those performance targets; and

WHEREAS, the CCSTCC adopted transit asset management performance management targets for the four performance measures outlined in the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act for 2018 in July 2018 via Resolution 2018-Q; and

WHEREAS, the CCSTCC affirms that it will plan, program, and fund projects that have a positive impact in achieving the targets; and

WHEREAS, the amendment is consistent with the 2040 Transportation Plan; and

WHEREAS, the amendment will not affect the regional air quality emission analysis of the SFY2018-2021 TIP; and

WHEREAS, the next scheduled update of the biennial Transportation Improvement Program is not until SFY2020.


That the members of the Clark County-Springfield Transportation Coordinating Committee approve the amendment to the SFY2018-SFY2021 Transportation Improvement Program as shown on the reverse side of this resolution.

____________________________________

Elmer M. BeardChairmanSeptember 14, 2018

Transportation Improvement Program

Clark County-Springfield Transportation Study 1

Transit Performance Measures In accordance with 23CFR450.306(d) and 23CFR450.326 (c-d), Transit TIP amendments must be developed in compliance with the transportation performance measure requirements of the FAST Act for Transit Performance Targets and Measures. About our Transit System The City of Springfield currently operates Springfield City Area Transit (SCAT). SCAT is located in the west central portion of Ohio and covers an area of approximately 24 square miles. SCAT has a fleet of 15 buses for fixed-route service, consisting of standard and low floor 29' and 30' transit coaches. The current peak requirement is for 11 vehicles. SCAT also has a fleet of 5 accessible vans. SCAT utilizes an operating contractor, First Transit, for both its fixed-route service and for ADA paratransit service. SCAT operates from a single maintenance and administration facility at 100 W. Jefferson St., Springfield, Ohio. The service is oriented around a transit center in downtown Springfield. Capital Replacement Program The City of Springfield (Springfield City Area Transit) was recently awarded two grants from the Ohio Department of Transportation, Office of Transit, for replacement buses. Some of those are expected to be received in 2019, while others are expected in 2020. Beyond 2020, we've set our targets based on the needs of capital replacement on our existing fleet, while considering recent funding opportunities that we expect to continue in future years. Transit Performance Targets & Measures Table 1

Assets also include equipment and various facilities including an Administration and Maintenance facility, parking structures and passenger facilities. Targets for equipment and facilities are listed on Table 2.

Transportation Improvement Program

Clark County-Springfield Transportation Study 2

Table 2

Additionally, in accordance with 49CFR625.33, a comprehensive list of investment priorities is developed to help CCSTCC achieve its Transit Asset Management targets. The maintenance staff of Springfield City Area Transit are experts in their field and provide guidance on which vehicles should be prioritized for replacement. This, along with useful life guidance provided by FTA and ODOT helps to determine our replacement program and investment prioritization plan. Transit Investment Prioritization Table 3

Finally, CCSTCC remains committed to working closely with our local transit provider, Ohio Department of Transportation and Federal Transit Administration in achieving established performance targets and measures as well as development of future targets. Information will be reviewed during monthly transit provider oversight sessions with the City of Springfield.

CLARK COUNTY-SPRINGFIELD TRANSPORTATION … Meeting Agenda 091418.pdf · Scott Schmid,...

Documents

Transcript of CLARK COUNTY-SPRINGFIELD TRANSPORTATION … Meeting Agenda 091418.pdf · Scott Schmid,...