City of BrandonSite Design Analysis 1148-18th Street Submitted by: Burns Maendel Consulting...

City of Brandon

Planning & Building Safety Department

638 Princess Avenue

Brandon, MB

R7A 0P3

Site Design Analysis

1148-18th Street

Submitted by:

Burns Maendel Consulting Engineers Ltd.

1331 Princess Ave.

Brandon, MB R7A 0R4

Tel: 204.728.7364

Fax: 204.728.4418

On behalf of:

P.R. Hotels (Brandon) Ltd.

Holiday Inn, 101 Pacific Avenue

Saskatoon, SK S7K 1N8

Tel: 306.241.5079

Standard Limitations

This report was prepared by Burns Maendel Consulting Engineers Ltd. (BMCE) for the

account of the Client (P.R. Hotels Brandon Ltd.). The disclosure of any information contained

in this report is the sole responsibility of the Client. The material in this report reflects

BMCE’s best judgment in light of the information available to it at the time of preparation.

Should this report be used by a third party, any reliance or decisions made based on this

report are the responsibility of such third party. BMCE accepts no responsibility for

damages, if any, suffered by a third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on

this report. BMCE makes no representation concerning the legal significance of the findings

or the information contained within this report.

Table of Contents

1. Project Background ......................................................................................................... i

1.1. Site Design Analysis Requirements .......................................................................... i

1.2. Proposed Site ........................................................................................................... i

1.3. Zoning and Land Use ................................................................................................ i

2. Neighborhood Impact .................................................................................................... ii

2.1. Adjacent Compatibility ........................................................................................... ii

2.2. Natural Environment ............................................................................................... ii

2.3. Safety and General Welfare ..................................................................................... ii

2.4. Views and Vistas ..................................................................................................... ii

3. Site Design .................................................................................................................... iv

3.1. Site Access ............................................................................................................. iv

3.2. Onsite Parking ....................................................................................................... iv

3.3. Loading Spaces / Overflow Parking ........................................................................ v

4. Urban Infrastructure Impact .......................................................................................... vi

4.1. Water Distribution .................................................................................................. vi

4.2. Wastewater ............................................................................................................ vi

4.3. Stormwater Management ...................................................................................... vii

4.4. Transportation ....................................................................................................... vii

- i -

1. Project Background

Burns Maendel Consulting Engineers Ltd. (BMCE) was retained by P.R. Hotels (Brandon)

Ltd. to complete the SDA for the property located at1148-18th Street in Brandon. The site is

legally described as Lots 11-16 & Lots 38-42, Block 3, Plan 202, BLTO (EXC NLY 10 FT LOT

11).

1.1. Site Design Analysis Requirements

The Brandon and Area Planning District (BAPD) Development Plan (DP) specifies that

buildings exceeding 4,645 sq. m of gross floor space require a detailed site design

analysis (SDA) be completed for the proposed development (as part of the approval

process).

Policy 16.2.3 of the DP specifies a list of criteria that should be addressed as part of the

report; we also referenced Zoning By-law No. 7124, Section 48 Planned Unit

Developments (PUD), which provides additional information required for PUD SDA

submissions. The City of Brandon (COB) also provided a supplementary list of

requirements to include with the submission.

1.2. Proposed Site

The proposed development will be located at the former Western Motel site and will

consist of a 6-storey hotel with 116 guest rooms. Access to the site will be off of 19th

Street and parking will be at grade. Since this is a proposed PUD, alternative standards

have been tabulated on the attached site plan, C1.1 in Appendix A.

A preliminary building elevation has been included in Appendix A. We note that this

plan is for conceptual purposes only and may not completely represent the final building

design.

1.3. Zoning and Land Use

The subject site is zoned Commercial Arterial Zone (CAR) and is surrounded by CAR

zoned properties. Directly south of the site, across Aagaard Avenue there are two

restaurants, a credit union and a fitness facility. There is a physiotherapist’s office to the

north, a retail strip mall to the east, an eyeglass provider to the south and a socializing

establishment to the west.

Also to the west is a Residential Moderate Density Zone (RMD) which contains 3-storey

apartment buildings. The RMD sites to the northwest and southwest of the site contain 2-

storey and 3-storey apartment buildings.

On the east side of 18th Street the property is zoned Parks and Recreation (PR); it is a

special development site where the Keystone Centre is located.

- ii -

2. Neighborhood Impact

The proposed development is located within a major retail corridor along 18th Street. This

is a six lane divided arterial that connects PTH No 1 from the north to PTH No 10 to the south.

A development of this nature, in this location, needs to give careful consideration to the

general nature of the surrounding area so as not to negatively impact adjacent land uses.

The following sections expand on compatibility, natural environment and the effects this

development may have on the neighbourhood.

2.1. Adjacent Compatibility

This development is ideally suited for this location due to the close proximity to the

Keystone Centre (KC) – a major sporting and agricultural events centre that attracts

thousands of people to the city year round. The KC site also contains an 11-storey hotel

located across the street (northeast) from the proposed 6-storey hotel.

The CAR zone permits a hotel and motel use as per Table 11: Commercial Use Table.

The site is surrounded by CAR zoned sites which complement the use.

2.2. Natural Environment

The effect that this development will have on the natural environment is minimal. The

area is already heavily developed with buildings, concrete and asphalt; therefore there

will be no increase in surface run-off from this site.

Impacts to existing vegetation and soil erosions are not anticipated due to the dense

retail location. Boulevard trees will be planted along the west and south site lines.

2.3. Safety and General Welfare

This development and its proposed activities will not hinder the safety or general

welfare of people living or working in the surrounding area.

2.4. Views and Vistas

The impact this building will have on adjacent structures has been considered. We have

analyzed the potential negative impact the shadowing of the six storey building could

have on the neighboring buildings. The shadowing effects were analyzed during both

the summer and winter solstice.

Based on this analysis, the singly storey structure directly north of the proposed hotel

saw the most shadowing effect during the winter solstice, being under shadow from

approximately 10:30am until 2:30pm.

- iii -

Figure 1: Winter Solstice (12:00pm)

Shadowing effects were minimal during the summer solstice. The buildings to the west

only saw shadowing prior to 7:00am. The building to the southeast is shadowed after

6:00pm.

Figure 2: Summer Solstice (7:00am)

- iv -

3. Site Design

Due to the close proximity to the Keystone Centre (KC), we anticipate that a large portion of

the guests staying at this hotel will also be KC patrons. We anticipate that some of these

guests may opt to walk from the hotel to the KC venue; therefore we have provided

adequate pedestrian connectivity within the site, across the public lane and through the

parking lot to 18th Street.

In order to preserve the accessibility of the existing back lane, a loading area has been

provided to ensure that the back lane is not blocked by vehicles. A bench will be provided

at the rear loading area to accommodate waiting guests and to provide a meeting place for

pedestrians.

Additional loading spaces have been provided at the main entrance to improve guest

unloading.

3.1. Site Access

Access from 18th Street has been eliminated to reduce traffic through the back lane.

Eliminating the 18th Street access also directs traffic to the building frontage on 19th

Street. To ensure efficient traffic flow, we will provide an entrance sign at the south

access off of 19th Street. This signage will encourage traffic to enter the site from the

south and to flow through the site to the north.

3.2. Onsite Parking

This PUD proposes 0.9 parking spaces per guest room (without the use of the overflow

parking; see section 3.3). This is a reduction from the 1:1 ratio provided in the zoning

by-law (Table 4). We are requesting this reduction not only due to site constraints, but

also because this type of hotel does not warrant a 1:1 ratio for parking. The zoning by-

law is created using simplified ratios to plan for the average condition, but the average

condition can create instances where many spaces are not used. By knowing how the

business operates we can accurately plan for a more appropriate number of parking

spaces.

The following asks and answers some questions required when considering parking

requirements for a hotel at this specific location.

How will guests be arriving at the hotel? As stated previously, the proximity to

the Keystone Centre (KC) means that many of the guests who stay at this hotel will

be attending events that are hosted at the KC.

The nature of events that take place in the KC will attract numerous guests who

travel in groups. These groups often travel in busses or carpool together.

Experience has also shown that guests attending the KC often travel with large

trucks and trailers that will be parked on the KC site for the duration of their stay.

Other events, for example the Association of Manitoba Municipalities convention

will result in multiple guests from an area arriving in one vehicle, but requiring

- v -

more than one room. These types of sceneries mean that there will likely never

be a time when every guest at the hotel will each require a parking space.

What type of service hotel is being proposed? This is limited service hotel that

does not have a restaurant or lounge. Hotels with restaurants and lounges require

additional parking spaces because customers other than guests will be accessing

the hotel; therefore additional parking will not be required to accommodate non

guest parking.

Will there be meeting rooms? We are planning to include meeting rooms.

These meeting rooms will be rented out during the day and use the same parking

spaces that guests use at night; therefore additional parking spaces for meeting

room guests are not required for this hotel.

What about employee parking? At most there will be two night staff between

the hours of 7:00 pm and 7:00 am when the parking demand is at the highest. The

day staff shift is scheduled between 8:00 am and 5:00 pm; we anticipate

approximately 12 daytime staff on average. Daytime staff will use the same

parking spaces that guests use at night; therefore additional parking spaces for

daytime staff are not required.

Our client is confident that we have designed a site with the appropriate number of parking

spaces required for this specific hotel use. It would be disadvantageous to the business to

provide an inadequate amount of parking spaces if we knew we needed more.

Furthermore, having a reputation for inadequate parking would be detrimental to the

company image. Alternatively we could tighten the site to gain a few more spaces by

reducing some of the landscape islands; however this would be at a detriment to proper site

design when, in our opinion, the additional parking spaces are not required.

3.3. Loading Spaces / Overflow Parking

In order to alleviate planning concerns with respect to adequate parking, we are

proposing to include overflow parking in the loading spaces along the front of the

building (that would be available for overnight parking if and when required). These

spaces would be labeled as a loading area and only when parking is at capacity would

employees direct visitors to park in this area overnight.

This scenario would provide an additional 10 spaces during peak events and bring the

ratio up to 0.98 parking spaces per room. While this scenario temporarily reduces the

two-way aisle width to 5.8m (2.9m per direction), we are of the opinion that these spaces

would rarely be required for overnight parking; therefore the width reduction would not

be detrimental to traffic flow. Given the fact that guests do not all arrive and depart at

the same time, having a reduced aisle width on rare occasions during the night should

not be a concern.

- vi -

4. Urban Infrastructure Impact

The following sections provide the information on the impact this development will have on

the urban infrastructure including water distribution, wastewater, stormwater management

and transportation.

4.1. Water Distribution

The potable water demand anticipated for the proposed hotel have been calculated

based on an assumed unit design demand of 300 L/room/day, which was a typical value

provided in several literature sources. The following table provides a summary of the

average and peak water demands.

Table 1: Water Demands

Parameter Quantity Comments

Rooms 116

Loading per Room 300 L / room / day Value based on a review of literature

Average Daily Flow 34,800 L / day Based upon total rooms

Max Hour Peaking Factor 4.20 Harmon Peaking Factor

Peak Hourly Flow 101.5 L / min

The proposed service is anticipated to be a 150mm due to the requirements for fire flows

and sprinkler systems. The potable water service connection will be from the 150mm

water main on 19th Street.

4.2. Wastewater

The wastewater flows generated by the proposed hotel have been calculated based on

an assumed unit design demand of 300 L/room/day, which was a typical value provided

in several literature sources. The following table provides a summary of the average and

peak wastewater loading.

Table 2: Wastewater Loading

Parameter Quantity Comments

Rooms 116

Loading per Room 300 L / room / day Value based on a review of literature.

Average Daily Flow 34,800 L / day Based upon total rooms

Max Hour Peaking Factor 4.20 Harmon Peaking Factor

Peak Hourly Flow 101.5 L / min

Extraneous Flow Rate 23,000 L / ha / day Value based on a review of literature.

Site Area 0.52 ha

Extraneous Flows 8.3 L / min

Peak Hourly Plus

Extraneous Flows 109.8 L/min

- vii -

The proposed service is anticipated to be a 150mm but will need to be confirmed during

the final design of the building wastewater system. The domestic sewer service

connection will be off of the 200mm sewer main on 19th Street.

4.3. Stormwater Management

The majority of the site is currently hard surfaced or contains buildings as does the new

proposed site layout; therefore post-development flows will be similar to pre-

development flows in this scenario. We do not anticipate requiring any on site

stormwater management; however it may be possible to reduce stormwater flows in

some areas of the site.

Existing drainage patterns are such that each parcel currently has split lot drainage to

the east and west; the public lane conveys water overland to the south and then west to

the Aaggard Ave and 19th Street intersection.

The east parcel containing the parking lot will need to maintain similar drainage patterns

as there is no stormwater infrastructure available in the vicinity along 18th Street. The

west parcel containing the hotel will also maintain existing patterns, but it may be

possible to reduce runoff rates by controlling discharge from the south parking lot. We

propose to investigate options during final design to ascertain if tying into the Aaggard

Ave and 19th Street storm sewer infrastructure is feasible. This will allow us to provide

onsite storage that will improve existing drainage conditions.

4.4. Transportation

A Traffic Impact Study was completed by WSP Canada Inc. The study has been included

in Appendix B.

Appendix A – Drawings

Conceptual Building Elevation (View from 19th Street)

(Note: This is an artist rendering of the proposed hotel. Rendering is for visualization purposes only and may not represent the final design and construction.)

38.7m

96.1m

38

.7

m

38

.7

m

38.8m

38.7m

96.1m

38

.7

m

38

.7

m

38.8m

38

.7

m

38

.7

m

38

.7

m

38

.7

m

38

.7

m

38

.7

m

38

.7

m

38

.7

m

38

.7

m

38

.7

m

38

.7

m

38

.7

m3

8.7

m

96.1m

38.8m

38

.7

m3

8.7

m

38

.7

m3

8.7

m

38.7m

96.1m

38

.7

m

38

.7

m

38.8m

38.7m

96.1m

38

.7

m3

8.7

m

38

.7

m

38

.7

m

38

.7

m3

8.7

m

38

.7

m

38

.7

m

38.2m

38

.7

m

6.1 6.1 6.1

2.7 (TYP U/N)

1

10

1314

20

21 28 29 30 33

34

37

39

40

50

51

DROP OFF / PICK UP

52

60

64

6.1 6.16.16.16.16.1

65

70

75

76

80

87

90

99

6.1 6.1

2.5

1.5

2.5

PROPOSED LANDSCAPE FEATURE ON

CITY OF BRANDON BOULEVARD

(ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT REQUIRED)

PROPOSED

6-STOREY

HOTEL

116 ROOMS

±1,114 m²

PROPOSED

CANOPY

6.1

1.2 SIDEWALK

0.3

REFUSE BINS WITH

OPAQUE ENCLOSURE

1.5m WIDE

LANDSCAPED

ISLAND

BENCH

2.5m WIDE

LANDSCAPED

ISLAND

BOULEVARD TREE (TYP)

LANDSCAPING

NINETEENTH STREET

EIGHTEENTH STREET

AA

GA

AR

D A

VE

NU

E

12

.1

1.5

6.1

20.1

20.1

8.0

RAISED PEDESTRIAN

CROSSING

1.2

PEDESTRIAN

CONNECTION

7.6

FREESTANDING

IDENTIFICATION SIGN

6.1

LOADING AREA / OVERFLOW

PARKING ZONE (10 SPACES)

1.5

2.1

5.8

8.0

1.5

1.21.2

86

6.1

6.7 (TYP)

0.9m HIGH ARCHITECTURAL

FEATURE WALL

6.1

6.1

2.5

1.5

1.5

19.0m

56.0m

19.0m

56.0m

6.1

8.1

10

.6

16.0m

16.0m

2.4

2.3

ENTRANCE SIGN

RAISED PEDESTRIAN

CROSSING

LOADING ZONE

N

A MAY 8, 2017 DAB CR ISSUED FOR CLIENT REVIEW AND COMMENT

REVISIONS

DRAWING NO:

PLOT SIZE:

PROJECT NUMBER:

SCALE:

PROJECT START DATE:

DESIGNED BY:

DRAWING TITLE:PROJECT NAME:

BURNS MAENDELCONSULTING ENGINEERS LTD.

DRAWN BY:

Tel: (204) 728-7364Fax: (204) 728-4418

1331 Princess Ave.Brandon, ManitobaR7A 0R4

REVIEWED BY:

NO: DATE APP. BY DESCRIPTION

PROPOSED HOTEL DEVELOPMENT

1148-18th ST

BRANDON, MB

PROPOSED SITE PLAN

BMCE-17-081C1.1

CR DAB

CR

MAY 5, 2017

A1 (594x841)

1:250

PROPOSED 6-STOREY HOTEL IN COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL ZONE

(AS PER ZONING BY-LAW NO 7136)

SITING REQUIREMENT MINIMUM PROVIDED

SITE AREA 372 m²5,200 m²

SITE WIDTH 12.1 m 96.1 m

FRONT YARD 12.1 m

SEE ALTERNATIVE

STANDARDS TABLE

SIDE YARD CORNER 3.0 m 12.1 m

SIDE YARD INTERIOR 1.5 m 12.1 m

REAR YARD LANE 6.0 m 6.1 m

SITING REQUIREMENT MAXIMUM PROVIDED

BUILDING HEIGHT 11.0 m 23.5 m

STOREYS 2.5 STOREYS 6 STOREYS

NOTES:

1) ALL DISTANCES ARE IN METRES AND DECIMALS THEREOF.

2) THE PROPERTY IS LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 11-16 & LOTS 38-42,

BLOCK 3, PLAN 202, BLTO (EXC NLY 10 FT LOT 11).

3) A TOTAL OF 104 PARKING SPACES HAVE BEEN PROVIDED (99

STANDARD PARKING STALLS AND 5 ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS).

TEN (10) PASSENGER VEHICLE LOADING SPACES HAVE ALSO BEEN

PROVIDED.

ALTERNATIVE STANDARDS

PROVISION CURRENT STANDARD PROPOSED STANDARD

SECTIONS (TABLES)

AFFECTED

MINIMUM FRONT

YARD

12.1 m

0 m (FOR CANOPY) 8.1 m (FOR

EXTERIOR STOREFRONT) 10.6 m

(TO 16.0m WIDE BUMP OUT).

PART 3, DIVISION 2

COMMERCIAL (TABLE 12)

REQUIRED PARKING

ONE (1) PARKING SPACE FOR

EVERY UNIT

0.9 PARKING SPACES FOR EVERY

UNIT (WITHOUT OVERFLOW

SPACES)

PART 2, DIVISION 3

PARKING (TABLE 4)

LOADING SPACES

AND OVERFLOW

PARKING

NONE

10 LOADING SPACES HAVE BEEN

PROVIDED (THESE SPACES WILL

BE CONVERTED TO OVERFLOW

PARKING SPACES WHEN

REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE 0.98

SPACES FOR EVERY UNIT)

PART 2, DIVISION 3

PARKING (TABLE 4)

MINIMUM PARKING

AND LOADING AREA

REQUIREMENTS

PARKING SPACES SHALL BE

2.7m WIDE BY 6.1m LONG;

LOADING SPACES SHALL BE


MINIMUM AISLE WIDTH SHALL BE

6.1m WIDE.


PROVIDED. (THREE SPACES ARE

2.5m WIDE BY 6.7m LONG; SEVEN

SPACES ARE 2.1m WIDE BY 6.7m

LONG). WHEN THE WESTERLY

SPACES ARE IN USE THE AISLE IS

REDUCED TO 5.8m WIDE.

PART 2, DIVISION 3

PARKING SECTION 27

(TABLE 6)

BUILDING FACADE

PLANTINGS

1.5m WIDE PERENNIAL AND/OR

SHRUB PLANTINGS SCREENING

BUILDING FOUNDATION

ELIMINATE SIDE YARD FACADE

PLANTINGS AND PROVIDE A

LANDSCAPE FEATURE ON FRONT

FACING BOULEVARD (REQUIRES

ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT

WITH THE CITY OF BRANDON)

URBAN AND LANDSCAPE

DESIGN STANDARDS

PARKING LOT

LANDSCAPING

STREET FACING SITE LINES TO

BE SEPARATED FROM ANY

STREET-FACING SITE LINE BY A

LANDSCAPED AREA WITH A

MINIMUM WIDTH OF 1.5m.

INSTALL AN ARCHITECTURAL

FEATURE WALL (APROX 0.9m

HIGH) ALONG THE 18th STREET

FRONTAGE. BOULEVARD TREES

REPLACE LANDSCAPING ON THE

SOUTH AND WEST SIDES.

URBAN AND LANDSCAPE

DESIGN STANDARDS

B AUG 2, 2017 DAB CR ISSUED FOR CLIENT REVIEW AND COMMENT

C SEPT 8, 2017 DAB CR ISSUED WITH SITE DESIGN ANALYSIS

Appendix B – Traffic Impact Study

BURNS MAENDEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS LTD.

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY PORPOSED HOTEL - 1148 18TH STREET - BRANDON, MANITOBA

SEPTEMBER 7, 2017

FOR CITY REVIEW

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY PORPOSED HOTEL - 1148 18TH STREET - BRANDON, MANITOBA BURNS MAENDEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS LTD. TYPE OF DOCUMENT (VERSION) FOR CITY REVIEW PROJECT NO.: 171-XXXXX-00 DATE: SEPTEMBER 2017

WSP 111-93 LOMBARD AVENUE WINNIPEG, MB, CANADA R3B 3B1 TEL.: +1 204 943-4948 WSP.COM

111-93 LOMBARD AVENUE WINNIPEG, MB, CANADA R3B 3B1 Tel.: +1 204 943-4948 wsp.com

September 7, 2017

FOR CITY REVIEW

BURNS MAENDEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS LTD. 1331 Princess Ave. Brandon, Manitoba R7A 0R4

Attention: Daniel Burns, P.Eng. - Senior Engineer

Subject: Traffic Impact Study for Client Review Client ref.: BMCE-17-081

Please submit to City of Brandon to review the following document and provide any feedback.

Sincerely,

Maury Steindel, M.Eng, P.Eng Project Engineer

MBS/xx Encl. cc: WSP ref.: 171-XXXXX-00

Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T

ISSUE/REVISION FIRST ISSUE REVISION 1 REVISION 2 REVISION 3

Remarks

Date

Prepared by

Signature

Checked by

Signature

Authorised by

Signature

Project number

Report number

File reference

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Project No. 171-XXXXX-00 BURNS MAENDEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS LTD.

WSP September 2017

Page iii

S I G N A T U R E S

PREPARED BY

Maury Steindel, M.Eng., P.Eng. Project engineer

REVIEWED BY

Scott Minty, M.Sc., P.Eng, Manager

This report was prepared by WSP for the account of BURNS MAENDEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS LTD., in accordance with the professional services agreement. The disclosure of any information contained in this report is the sole responsibility of the intended recipient. The material in it reflects WSP’s best judgement in light of the information available to it at the time of preparation. Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it, are the responsibility of such third parties. WSP accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report. This limitations statement is considered part of this report.

The original of the technology-based document sent herewith has been authenticated and will be retained by WSP for a minimum of ten years. Since the file transmitted is now out of WSP’s control and its integrity can no longer be ensured, no guarantee may be given with regards to any modifications made to this document.

Maury.Steindel

Maury Steindel - Signature

Maury.Steindel

Scott Minty - Signature


WSP September 2017

Page v

P R O D U C T I O N T E A M

CLIENT

Senior Engineer


Daniel Burns, P.Eng

WSP

Project Engineer Maury Steindel, M.Eng., P.Eng.

Manager Scott Minty, M.Sc., P.Eng.


WSP September 2017

Page vii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................... 1

1.1 Study Purpose And Objective ......................................................... 1

1.2 Site Location .................................................................................. 1

1.3 Description Of The Proposed Development ................................... 2

1.4 Site Location .................................................................................. 2

2 EXISTING CONDITIONS ..................................................... 3

2.1 Land Use ......................................................................................... 3

2.2 Geometrics and Traffic Control ..................................................... 3

2.3 Background Traffic Volumes ......................................................... 3

3 PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC .....................4

3.1 Trip Generation .............................................................................. 4

3.2 Trip Distribution and Assignment ................................................. 4

3.3 Development Staging ..................................................................... 4

4 POST DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC ................................... 5

4.1 Buildout Year Traffic ..................................................................... 5

4.2 Total Post Development Traffic ..................................................... 6

5 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ............................................................. 7

5.1 Analysis Assumptions .................................................................... 7

5.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization and Level of Service ................. 7

6 CLOSING .................................................................................. 9

6.1 Conclusions .................................................................................... 9

6.2 Recommendations .......................................................................... 9

WSP September 2017 Page viii

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Project No. 171-XXXXX-00


TABLES TABLE 2.1 OBSERVED PEAK TRAFFIC – 2017 VOLUMES ........................... 3 TABLE 3.1 SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES ....................................... 4 TABLE 4.1 ESTIMATED BACKGROUND TRAFFIC (2018) ............................. 5 TABLE 4.2 ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC ....................................... 5 TABLE 4.3 ESTIMATED COMBINED TRAFFIC (2019) ................................... 6 TABLE 5.1 LEVEL OF SERVICE, INTERSECTION CAPACITY

UTILIZATION, AND DELAY – PEAK HOURS .............................. 7

FIGURES FIGURE 1.1 SITE LOCATION ............................................................................. 1 FIGURE 1.2 STUDY AREA .................................................................................. 2

APPENDICES

A PROPOSED SITE PLAN

B TURNING MOVEMENT TRAFFIC DATA

C SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC CALCULATIONS

D TRAFFIC MODEL INPUT VOLUMES


WSP September 2017

Page 1

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 STUDY PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE The purpose of this Traffic Impact Study (TIS) is to estimate the impacts of the proposed 116 room hotel on the adjacent roadway network; and identify any upgrades, if required.

1.2 SITE LOCATION The proposed development site, shown in Figure 1.1, is located 1148 - 18th Street in Brandon, Manitoba. The site is bounded by Aagaard Avenue to the South, 19th Street to the West, and commercial lots to the North.

Figure 1.1 Site Location

WSP September 2017 Page 2



1.3 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed development is a 116 room hotel. There is a proposed access to the site on 19th Street, and a secondary access from the lane between 18th Street and 19th Street. The development is scheduled to begin in 2018, and it is assumed to be completed by spring 2019.

The proposed site plan drawings are shown in Appendix - A

1.4 SITE LOCATION The area selected for study includes the following intersections, shown in Figure 1.2:

18th Street & Brandon Avenue,

18th Street & Aagaard Avenue,

19th Street & Brandon Avenue, and

19th Street & Aagaard Avenue

Figure 1.2 Study Area


WSP September 2017

Page 3

2 EXISTING CONDITIONS

2.1 LAND USE The existing land use surrounding the proposed hotel is commercial and multifamily residential lots to the west.

2.2 GEOMETRICS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL 18th Street at Brandon Avenue is a 4-lane divided arterial with left turn lanes and a posted speed limit of 60 km/h. Brandon Avenue is a 2-lane undivided local with a speed limit of 50 km/h. The intersection with 18th Street is signalized with no dedicated turning phases. All other intersections are stop controlled on the minor street. 19th Street and Aagaard Avenue are 2-lane undivided locals with a speed limit of 50 km/h.

2.3 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES Traffic volumes were counted by WSP in July and August 2017 during the AM and PM Peak hours. Analysis of the peak hour turning movements was used to determine the volume of existing background traffic. A growth rate of 2.5% was applied to compute volumes beyond 2017. A summary of the data collected at the study intersections are shown in Table 2.1.

Table 2.1 Observed Peak Traffic – 2017 volumes

INTERSECTION NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR

AM

18th & Brandon 20 480 4 24 364 44 180 20 24 16 4 1

18th & Aagaard 8 480 0 0 364 4 1 0 1 0 0 0

19th & Brandon 4 1 16 4 1 1 12 204 8 1 80 1

19th & Aagaard 4 4 1 1 4 1 16 1 4 4 4 1

PM

18th & Brandon 32 764 1 8 1032 224 180 4 80 4 4 1

18th & Aagaard 56 972 0 0 1108 24 8 0 36 0 0 0

19th & Brandon 8 12 24 12 1 12 12 204 1 24 184 4

19th & Aagaard 8 20 1 1 12 4 1 20 4 12 16 32

All traffic data is shown in Appendix - B.




3 PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC

3.1 TRIP GENERATION The site generated traffic volume was determined using formulae defined in the ITE Manual: Trip Generation (7th Ed.) with Land Use #310 Hotel (116 rooms). The site generated traffic, upon full buildout is show in Table 3.1. Should the proposed development change, the results of this study should be re-evaluated.

Table 3.1 Site Generated Traffic Volumes

TIME PERIOD ENTERING EXITING

Weekday 333 veh/day 333 veh/day

AM Weekday - peak hr 35 veh/hr 29 veh/hr

PM Weekday - peak hr 38 veh/hr 27 veh/hr

Site generated traffic calculations are shown in Appendix - C.

3.2 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT Trip distribution for the development is based on existing traffic and travel demand characteristics. Using the existing traffic as a guide and the location of major employment areas, it was estimated that a largest proportion of trips will access the site from the North on 18th Street, with the remainder from the South on 18th Street. The assumed trip assignment for the development is as follows:

To/from the North on 18th Street: 70%

To/from the South on 18th Street: 30%

3.3 DEVELOPMENT STAGING The proposed subdivision will be constructed starting in 2018. For the purposes of this study, is assumed that the development will achieve full buildout in spring 2019.


WSP September 2017

Page 5

4 POST DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC

4.1 BUILDOUT YEAR TRAFFIC The estimated traffic at the study intersections from the proposed development at full buildout of 2019 is shown in Table 4.1 and Table 4.2. A 2.5%growth rate is applied to compute 2018 background volumes.

Table 4.1 Estimated Background Traffic (2018)


AM

18th & Brandon 21 492 5 25 374 46 185 21 25 17 5 5

18th & Aagaard 9 492 0 0 374 5 5 0 5 0 0 0

19th & Brandon 5 5 17 5 5 5 13 210 9 5 82 5

19th & Aagaard 5 5 5 5 5 5 17 5 5 5 5 5

PM

18th & Brandon 33 784 5 9 1058 230 185 5 82 5 5 5

18th & Aagaard 58 997 0 0 1136 25 9 0 37 0 0 0

19th & Brandon 9 13 25 13 5 13 13 210 5 25 189 5

19th & Aagaard 9 21 5 5 13 5 5 21 5 13 17 33

Table 4.2 Estimated Development Traffic


AM

18th & Brandon 11 0 0 0 13 13 20 0 4 0 0 0

18th & Aagaard 0 11 0 0 4 13 0 0 4 0 0 0

19th & Brandon 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0

19th & Aagaard 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13

PM

18th & Brandon 11 0 0 0 13 13 20 0 4 0 0 0

18th & Aagaard 0 11 0 0 4 13 0 0 4 0 0 0

19th & Brandon 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0

19th & Aagaard 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13




4.2 TOTAL POST DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC The combined traffic at full buildout 2019 is shown in Table 4.3

Table 4.3 Estimated Combined Traffic (2019)


AM

18th & Brandon 32 492 5 25 387 59 205 21 29 17 5 5

18th & Aagaard 9 503 0 0 378 18 5 0 6 0 0 0

19th & Brandon 5 5 42 5 5 5 13 210 9 25 82 5

19th & Aagaard 5 5 5 6 5 5 17 5 5 5 5 15

PM

18th & Brandon 44 784 5 9 1071 243 205 5 86 5 5 5

18th & Aagaard 58 1008 0 0 1140 38 9 0 41 0 0 0

19th & Brandon 9 13 49 13 5 13 13 210 5 50 189 5

19th & Aagaard 9 21 5 6 13 5 5 21 5 13 17 46


WSP September 2017

Page 7

5 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

5.1 ANALYSIS ASSUMPTIONS As part of the traffic capacity analysis and determination of the effects of the development, the following assumptions were made with respect to specific analysis criteria, including:

The 85th percentile speed on all roadways in the study area are equal to the posted speed limit; Commercial truck volumes are 2% of total traffic during peak hours; Traffic signal timing is coordinated and optimized; Minimum turning movement volumes of five (5) vehicles per hour; Background traffic growth rate of 2.5%.

5.2 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION AND LEVEL OF SERVICE

The AM and PM peak was modelled using Synchro software to determine the impact of site generated traffic and background traffic on the adjacent roads and intersections. PM Peak is generally the governing peak due to its higher hourly volumes and more concentrated time of day distribution. These characteristic are also present in the observed traffic in the study area. Scenarios were modelled for background traffic in 2019, and for both background and combined in 2019– full buildout. The results showing Level of Service (LOS), Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU), and average Delay (in seconds/vehicle) are given in Table 5.1 .

Table 5.1 Level of Service, Intersection Capacity Utilization, and Delay – Peak Hours

Intersection Traffic Type

2019 - Full Buildout (100%)

AM Peak PM Peak

LOS ICU Delay Max V/C LOS ICU Delay Max V/C

18th & Brandon Background B 44% 10.2 0.41 B 61% 11.8 0.72

Combined B 46% 10.3 0.45 B 63% 12.7 0.75

18th & Aagaard Background A 24% 0.2 0.16 A 49% 0.7 0.48

Combined A 24% 0.2 0.16 A 49% 0.7 0.49

19th & Brandon Background A 26% 1.6 0.04 A 29% 2.4 0.09

Combined A 24% 2.5 0.08 A 39% 3.2 0.13

19th & Aagaard Background A 13% 6.0 0.02 A 15% 4.5 0.05

Combined A 14% 5.3 0.02 A 16% 4.2 0.05




The analysis shows there is sufficient capacity at all intersection in the study area can accommodate existing and development traffic at full buildout in 2019. The turning movement data used as input for the model and results for all study intersection are shown in Appendix - D.


WSP September 2017

Page 9

6 CLOSING

6.1 CONCLUSIONS The analysis shows there is sufficient capacity at all intersections in the study area to accommodate existing and development traffic at full buildout in 2019.

6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the above conclusions it is recommended that no upgrades are required at any intersections in the study area due to the proposed development.


WSP September 2017

Page C

A PROPOSED SITE PLAN

WSP September 2017 Page D



This page left intentionally blank.

38.7m

96.1m

38.7m

38.7m

38.8m

38.7m

96.1m

38.7m

38.7m

38.8m

38.7m

38.7m

38.7m

38.7m

38.7m

38.7m

38.7m

38.7m

38.7m

38.7m

38.7m

38.7m

38.7m

96.1m

38.8m

38.7m

38.7m

38.7m

38.7m

38.7m

96.1m

38.7m

38.7m

38.8m

38.7m

96.1m

38.7m

38.7m

38.7m

38.7m

38.7m

38.7m

38.7m

38.7m

38.2m

38.7m

6.1 6.1 6.1

2.7 (TYP U/N)

1

10

1314

20

21 28 29 30 33

34

37

39

40

50

51

DROP OFF / PICK UP

52

60

64

6.1 6.16.16.16.16.1

65

70

75

76

80

87

90

99

6.1 6.1

2.5

1.5

2.5

PROPOSED LANDSCAPE FEATURE ON

CITY OF BRANDON BOULEVARD

(ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT REQUIRED)

PROPOSED

6-STOREY

HOTEL

116 ROOMS

PROPOSED

CANOPY

6.1

1.2 SIDEWALK

0.3

REFUSE BINS WITH

OPAQUE ENCLOSURE

1.5m WIDE

LANDSCAPED

ISLAND

BENCH

2.5m WIDE

LANDSCAPED

ISLAND

BOULEVARD TREE (TYP)

LANDSCAPING

NINETEENTH STREET

EIGHTEENTH STREET

AA

GA

AR

D A

VE

NU

E

12

.1

1.5

6.1

20.1

20.1

8.0

RAISED PEDESTRIAN

CROSSING

1.2

PEDESTRIAN

CONNECTION

7.6

FREESTANDING

IDENTIFICATION SIGN

6.1

LOADING AREA / OVERFLOW

PARKING ZONE (10 SPACES)

1.5

2.1

5.8

8.0

1.5

1.21.2

86

6.1

6.7 (TYP)

0.9m HIGH ARCHITECTURAL

FEATURE WALL

6.1

6.1

2.5

1.5

1.5

19.0m

56.0m

19.0m

56.0m

6.1

8.1

10

.6

16.0m

16.0m

2.4

2.3

N

P

R

E

L

IM

IN

A

R

Y

F

O

R

R

E

V

IE

W

A

N

D

C

O

M

M

E

N

T

O

N

L

Y

A MAY 8, 2017 DAB CR ISSUED FOR CLIENT REVIEW AND COMMENT

REVISIONS

DRAWING NO:

PLOT SIZE:

PROJECT NUMBER:

SCALE:

PROJECT START DATE:

DESIGNED BY:

DRAWING TITLE:PROJECT NAME:

BURNS MAENDELCONSULTING ENGINEERS LTD.

DRAWN BY:

Tel: (204) 728-7364Fax: (204) 728-4418

1331 Princess Ave.Brandon, ManitobaR7A 0R4

REVIEWED BY:

NO: DATE APP. BY DESCRIPTION

P.R. HOTELS

HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS

1148-18th ST, BRANDON, MB

PROPOSED SITE PLAN

BMCE-17-081C1.1

CR DAB

CR

MAY 5, 2017

A1 (594x841)

1:250

PROPOSED 6-STOREY HOTEL IN COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL ZONE

(AS PER ZONING BY-LAW NO 7136)

SITING REQUIREMENT MINIMUM PROVIDED

SITE AREA 372 m²5,200 m²

SITE WIDTH 12.1 m 96.1 m

FRONT YARD 12.1 m

SEE ALTERNATIVE

STANDARDS TABLE

SIDE YARD CORNER 3.0 m 12.1 m

SIDE YARD INTERIOR 1.5 m 12.1 m

REAR YARD LANE 6.0 m 7.6 m

SITING REQUIREMENT MAXIMUM PROVIDED

BUILDING HEIGHT 11.0 m 23.5 m

STOREYS 2.5 STOREYS 6 STOREYS

NOTES:

1) ALL DISTANCES ARE IN METRES AND DECIMALS THEREOF.

2) THE PROPERTY IS LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 11-16 & LOTS 38-42,

BLOCK 3, PLAN 202, BLTO (EXC NLY 10 FT LOT 11).

3) A TOTAL OF 104 PARKING SPACES HAVE BEEN PROVIDED (99

STANDARD PARKING STALLS AND 5 ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS).

TEN (10) PASSENGER VEHICLE LOADING SPACES HAVE ALSO BEEN

PROVIDED.

ALTERNATIVE STANDARDS

PROVISION CURRENT STANDARD PROPOSED STANDARD

SECTIONS (TABLES)

AFFECTED

MINIMUM FRONT

YARD

12.1 m

0 m (FOR CANOPY) 8.1 m (FOR

EXTERIOR STOREFRONT) 10.6 m

(TO BUMP OUT); THE MAIN

BUILDING CONFORMS.

PART 3, DIVISION 2


MINIMUM REAR

YARD

7.6m

6.1 m (TO BUMP OUT); THE MAIN

BUILDING CONFORMS.

PART 3, DIVISION 2


REQUIRED PARKING

ONE (1) PARKING SPACE FOR

EVERY UNIT

0.9 PARKING SPACES FOR EVERY

UNIT (WITHOUT OVERFLOW

SPACES)

PART 2, DIVISION 3

PARKING (TABLE 4)

LOADING SPACES NONE


PROVIDED (THESE SPACES WILL

BE CONVERTED TO OVERFLOW

PARKING SPACES WHEN

REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE 0.98

SPACES FOR EVERY UNIT)

PART 2, DIVISION 3

PARKING (TABLE 4)

MINIMUM PARKING

AND LOADING AREA

REQUIREMENTS

PARKING SPACES SHALL BE


LOADING SPACES SHALL BE


MINIMUM AISLE WIDTH SHALL BE

6.1m WIDE.


PROVIDED. (THREE SPACES ARE

2.5m WIDE BY 6.7m LONG; SEVEN

SPACES ARE 2.1m WIDE BY 6.7m

LONG). WHEN THE WESTERLY

SPACES ARE IN USE THE AISLE IS

REDUCED TO 5.8m WIDE.

PART 2, DIVISION 3

PARKING SECTION 27

(TABLE 6)

BUILDING FACADE

PLANTINGS

1.5m WIDE PERENNIAL AND/OR

SHRUB PLANTINGS SCREENING

BUILDING FOUNDATION

ELIMINATE SIDE YARD FACADE

PLANTINGS AND PROVIDE A

LANDSCAPE FEATURE ON FRONT

FACING BOULEVARD (REQUIRES

ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT

WITH THE CITY OF BRANDON)

URBAN AND LANDSCAPE

DESIGN STANDARDS

PARKING LOT

LANDSCAPING

STREET FACING SITE LINES TO

BE SEPARATED FROM ANY

STREET-FACING SITE LINE BY A

LANDSCAPED AREA WITH A

MINIMUM WIDTH OF 1.5m.

INSTALL AN ARCHITECTURAL

FEATURE WALL (APROX 0.9m

HIGH) ALONG THE 18th STREET

FRONTAGE. BOULEVARD TREES

REPLACE LANDSCAPING ON THE

SOUTH AND WEST SIDES.

URBAN AND LANDSCAPE

DESIGN STANDARDS

B AUG 2, 2017 DAB CR ISSUED FOR CLIENT REVIEW AND COMMENT


WSP September 2017

Page E

B TURNING MOVEMENT TRAFFIC DATA

WSP September 2017 Page F




U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right

7:15 0

7:30 0

7:45 0

8:00 0 2 120 0 0 0 91 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 214

8:15 0

8:30 0

8:45 0

9:00 0

15:15 0

15:30 0

15:45 0

16:00 0

16:15 0

16:30 0

16:45 0

17:00 0

17:15 0 14 243 0 0 0 277 6 0 2 0 9 0 0 0 0 551

17:30 0

17:45 0

18:00 0


2 120 91 1 214

14 243 277 6 2 9 551

0.01

1.4%

98.6%

Notes: 15 min count

PM Peak Hour (between 15:00 and 18:00) is from:

AM

Pe

akP

M P

eak

Temperature

Counted By

Count Date

Ratio: E/W to N/S =

E/W =

N/S = °C

WSP

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

PM

No Data

°C

BM

Tuesday, August 22, 2017

Intersection Turning MovementWSP Manual Vehicle Count

AM

RainWeather

5:30 - 9:30

18:30 - 22:30

WESTBOUND ON

TOTAL 18th Street 18th Street Aagaard Ave Aagaard Ave

AM Peak Hour (between 7:00 and 9:00) is from:

TOTAL

PM

Peak

Time

Ending

NORTHBOUND ON SOUTHBOUND ON EASTBOUND ON

AM

Peak

18th Street 18th Street Aagaard AveNORTHBOUND ON SOUTHBOUND ON EASTBOUND ON WESTBOUND ON

Aagaard AveTime Ending


7:15 0

7:30 0

7:45 0

8:00 0 5 120 1 0 6 91 11 0 45 5 6 0 4 1 0 295

8:15 0

8:30 0

8:45 0

9:00 0

15:15 0

15:30 0

15:45 0

16:00 0

16:15 0

16:30 0

16:45 0

17:00 0

17:15 0 8 191 0 0 2 258 56 0 45 1 20 0 1 1 0 583

17:30 0

17:45 0

18:00 0


5 120 1 6 91 11 45 5 6 4 1 295

8 191 2 258 56 45 1 20 1 1 583

0.17

14.7%

85.3%

Notes:

TOTAL

PM

Peak

Time

Ending


AM

Peak

18th Street 18th Street Brandon AveNORTHBOUND ON SOUTHBOUND ON EASTBOUND ON WESTBOUND ON

Brandon AveTime Ending


AM

RainWeather

5:30 - 9:30

18:30 - 22:30

WESTBOUND ON

TOTAL 18th Street 18th Street Brandon Ave Brandon Ave


PM

Clear

°C

WSP

Wednesday, July 19, 2017Count Date

Ratio: E/W to N/S =

E/W =

N/S = °C

WSP



AM

Pe

akP

M P

eak

Temperature

Counted By

15 min count


7:15 0

7:30 0

7:45 0

8:00 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 1 0 1 1 0 10

8:15 0

8:30 0

8:45 0

9:00 0

15:15 0

15:30 0

15:45 0

16:00 0

16:15 0

16:30 0

16:45 0

17:00 0

17:15 0 2 5 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 5 1 0 3 4 8 32

17:30 0

17:45 0

18:00 0


1 1 1 4 1 1 1 10

2 5 3 1 5 1 3 4 8 32

2.00

66.7%

33.3%

Notes: 15 min count


AM

Pe

akP

M P

eak

Temperature

Counted By

Count Date

Ratio: E/W to N/S =

E/W =

N/S = °C

WSP


PM

Clear

°C

WSP

Wednesday, July 19, 2017


AM

RainWeather

5:30 - 9:30

18:30 - 22:30

WESTBOUND ON

TOTAL 19th Street 19th Street Aagaard Ave Aagaard Ave


TOTAL

PM

Peak

Time

Ending


AM

Peak

19th Street 19th Street Aagaard AveNORTHBOUND ON SOUTHBOUND ON EASTBOUND ON WESTBOUND ON

Aagaard AveTime Ending


7:15 0

7:30 0

7:45 0

8:00 0 1 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 3 51 2 0 0 20 0 82

8:15 0

8:30 0

8:45 0

9:00 0

15:15 0

15:30 0

15:45 0

16:00 0

16:15 0

16:30 0

16:45 0

17:00 0

17:15 0 2 3 6 0 3 0 3 0 3 51 0 0 6 46 1 124

17:30 0

17:45 0

18:00 0


1 4 1 3 51 2 20 82

2 3 6 3 3 3 51 6 46 1 124

7.96

88.8%

11.2%

Notes:

TOTAL

PM

Peak

Time

Ending


AM

Peak

19th Street 19th Street Brandon AveNORTHBOUND ON SOUTHBOUND ON EASTBOUND ON WESTBOUND ON

Brandon AveTime Ending


AM

No DataWeather

5:30 - 9:30

18:30 - 22:30

WESTBOUND ON

TOTAL 19th Street 19th Street Brandon Ave Brandon Ave


PM

Clear

°C

WSP

Wednesday, July 19, 2017Count Date

Ratio: E/W to N/S =

E/W =

N/S = °C

BM



AM

Pe

akP

M P

eak

Temperature

Counted By

15 min count


WSP September 2017

Page G

C SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC CALCULATIONS

WSP September 2017 Page H




Prepared By: Maury Steindel, P.Eng.

Trip Generation Caculations

18th Street Hotel (WSP# 171-#####-00)Brandon, MB

310

Pass-By Rate 0%

Control Variable Rooms 116

Total 100% 665

Entering 50% 333

Exiting 50% 333

Total 100% 64

Entering 55% 35

Exiting 45% 29

Total 100% 65

Entering 58% 38

Exiting 42% 27

Note


ITE #

Category Hotel

Weekday

AM Peak of Generator

PM Peak of Generator

Prepared By: Maury Steindel, P.Eng.

Trip Generation Summary

18th Street Hotel (WSP# 171-#####-00)Brandon, MB

↑ ↓ → ←

North South East West

Trips 0% 0% 0% 0%

Total 665

Entering 333 0 0 0 0

Exiting 333 0 0 0 0

Total 64

Entering 35 0 0 0 0

Exiting 29 0 0 0 0

Total 65

Entering 38 0 0 0 0

Exiting 27 0 0 0 0

AM Peak of Generator

PM Peak of Generator


Primary Trips

Weekday


WSP September 2017

Page I

D TRAFFIC MODEL INPUT VOLUMES

WSP September 2017 Page J




Full Buildout - Background - AM

Intersection NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR

18th & Brandon 21 492 5 25 374 46 185 21 25 17 5 5

18th & Aagaard 9 492 0 0 374 5 5 0 5 0 0 0

19th & Brandon 5 5 17 5 5 5 13 210 9 5 82 5

19th & Aagaard 5 5 5 5 5 5 17 5 5 5 5 5

Full Buildout - Background - AM


18th & Brandon 33 784 5 9 1058 230 185 5 82 5 5 5

18th & Aagaard 58 997 0 0 1136 25 9 0 37 0 0 0

19th & Brandon 9 13 25 13 5 13 13 210 5 25 189 5

19th & Aagaard 9 21 5 5 13 5 5 21 5 13 17 33

Full Buildout - Combined - AM


18th & Brandon 32 492 5 25 387 59 205 21 29 17 5 5

18th & Aagaard 9 503 0 0 378 18 5 0 6 0 0 0

19th & Brandon 5 5 42 5 5 5 13 210 9 25 82 5

19th & Aagaard 5 5 5 6 5 5 17 5 5 5 5 15

Full Buildout - Combined - AM


18th & Brandon 44 784 5 9 1071 243 205 5 86 5 5 5

18th & Aagaard 58 1008 0 0 1140 38 9 0 41 0 0 0

19th & Brandon 9 13 49 13 5 13 13 210 5 50 189 5

19th & Aagaard 9 21 5 6 13 5 5 21 5 13 17 46

City of BrandonSite Design Analysis 1148-18th Street Submitted by: Burns Maendel Consulting...

Documents

Transcript of City of BrandonSite Design Analysis 1148-18th Street Submitted by: Burns Maendel Consulting...