Agenda Marshfield Pool Study Committee

7:00PM Thursday, March 9, 2017 City Hall – Room 108 - City Hall Plaza

630 S. Central Avenue

I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February 9, 2017

II. PUBLIC COMMENT: Please be advised per State Statute Section 19.84(2), information will be received from the public. At this time, the chairperson will recognize members of the public who have indicated a desire to address the Committee. Be advised that there may be limited discussion on the information received; however, no action can be taken under public comment.

III. AYERS CONCEPTUAL DESIGN:

IV. SITE DISCUSSION:

V. NEXT MEETING: 7:00PM April 13, 2017

VI. ADJOURNMENT:

UPON REASONABLE NOTICE: It is possible that members, and possibly a quorum, of other governmental bodies of the municipality may be in attendance at the above-stated meeting to gather information; any governmental body specifically referred to above in this notice will take no action. Upon reasonable notice, efforts will be made to accommodate the needs of disabled individuals through appropriate aids and services. For additional information or to request this service, contact Parks & Recreation Department (715) 384-4642 at least 2 days prior to the meeting.

CITY OF MARSHFIELD

MEETING NOTICE

City of Marshfield Marshfield Pool Study Committee

Thursday, February 9, 2017 Meeting Minutes City Hall, 630 S. Central Avenue

I. CALL TO ORDER:

The meeting was called to order by Ben Lee at 7:00 p.m. Present: Justin Casperson, Josh Cole, Pat Gall, Chris Jockheck, Ben Lee, Ali Luedtke, Stephanie Smith, Rebecca Spiros, Jim Wein, and John White Jr. Absent: Kelly Cassidy & Monica Koehn.

II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Motion by White, seconded by Gall to approve the January 12, 2017

meeting minutes. Motion Carried.

III. PUBLIC COMMENT: None.

IV. REVIEW COUNCIL PRESENATION BY AYERS: The committee discussed the Common Council presentation by Ayers Associates. The committee felt the presentation was valuable and hit the important points. The committee would like to know the response to Alderperson Witzel’s question, which pertained to the new pool surface water square footage compared to the current pool. Casperson told the committee that he has been in contact with Ayers and requested clarification on the question, as well as a comparison chart between the proposed facility and current pool. He hoped to have that information before the next meeting. The Committee asked the following questions be extended to Ayers: 1. Why is the pool that size? How did we get to that size? What factors were used? 2. Can we get the dimensions? Length and Width of the facilities? (i.e. bathhouse, pool vessels, inside

fence, parking lot, etc…) 3. How is a pool capacity derived?

V. SITE SELECTION: The Committee established the matrix criteria and weights.

Scale 1 to 5 (1=low, 5=high) Weight 1 Space - Acreage 5 2 Location near Trail System 3 3 Cost of Land 5 4 Population Density - near housing - zoning 2 5 Safe Access/Traffic 4 6 Economic Impact to Area 2 7 Aesthetics/Neighborhood 4 8 Benefits to other Park Facilities 3 9 Infrastructure - Utilities 3 10 Timeline 5 11 Demographic 1 12 Expansion of other Rec. Possibilities 3 13 Buildable 3

The Committee briefly looked at 17 sites. The Committee removed the following sites from consideration: 1. Weinbrenner Site (#2) – The site is too small and Trussoni said the EDB was interested in other uses

of the building like apartments or other shops.

2. 14th & Adams (#4) – The site fits acreage requirements, however Alderperson Jockheck said the property is currently being considered for residential development by the City.

3. Arnold & Peach (#5) – The site is limited on size, however the committee did not want to displace the current businesses, the vehicle traffic was high, and a potential contamination risk.

4. Upper Pond (#6) – It was determined it is not a realistic option because people like the water feature and the cost to fill in the pond would be cost prohibitive.

5. Vine and 25th (#16) – This site is used for City’s aggregate stockpile. It was determined the site is too important to the City to relinquish and it’s not an ascetically pleasing location.

6. 2200 Maple (#17) – This site is currently home to many mobile homes. It was determined the site would cause too much displacement of the homeowners and it not an ascetically pleasing location.

Casperson will pass along the matrix and potential site map to the City’s Public Works and Development Services Departments for review and comment.

VI. NEXT MEETING: 7:00 p.m. on March 9, 2017

VII. ADJOURNMENT: 8:32 p.m. Motion Carried

Respectfully Submitted: Justin Casperson Parks & Recreation Director

S C

EN

TR

AL A

VE

S R

OD

DI S

AV

E

10' S

ETBA

CK F

ROM

PRO

PERT

Y LIN

E

50' S

TRUC

TURE

SET

BACK

FRO

M S

TREE

T

10' SETBA

CK FRO

M PRO

PERTY LIN

E

50' STRU

CTU

RE SETBAC

K FRO

M STREET

PRO

PERT

Y LIN

E

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY

LINE

CR

AR

M

1

3

4

10

5

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

2

20

20

21

21

21

21

21

21

21

16

Marshfield, Wisconsin ID |27-1069 01 16 | 2017

Hefko Pool Reconstruction - Concept Plan 30' 60'15'0

POOL

POOL BUILDING

PARKING· 164 spaces

WATER PLAY STRUCTURE

ADA ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE RAMP

SLIDES

DIVING BOARDS (1 & 3 Meter)

BASKETBALL HOOPS

CLIMBING WALL

FAMILY SLIDE

WATER JOURNEY

SHADE STRUCTURES - LARGE

SHADE STRUCTURES - SMALL

DROP OFF AREA

LAP/RECREATION POOL

RESERVABLE SHELTER

CURRENT CHANNEL

SPRAY JETS

ONE WAY EXIT

SHOWER TOWER

LIFEGUARD STAND OR CHAIR

L E G E N D

A

C

Atrium/Lifeguard Area

Concessions

Mechanical

Restroom/Changing Area

M

R

· Bath house: 6,055 sf· Main pool surface area: 12,019 sf· Lap pool surface area: 3,150 sf· Water Journey surface area: 200 sf· Total water surface area: 15,369 sf· Current channel length: 153 lf· Total patron capacity: 981 patrons· Pool deck area: 25,500 sf· Total parking spaces: 164 spaces

Site Plan Statistics

· Water Journey: 200 sf· Main Pool (0' - 2'): 5,718 sf· Main Pool (2' - 4'): 4,977 sf· Current channel: 1,324 sf· Lap pool: 3,150 sf

Water Depth Area Breakdown

1

2

3

4

5

7

6

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

From: Theisen, Blake [mailto:TheisenB@AyresAssociates.com] Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 12:55 PM To: Casperson, Justin Subject: Pool sizing info Justin- here is or rationale for the pool sizing. I hope that this helps! The general size of the pool facilities was based on prior experience, the facility budget, and the 2000 Marshfield Swimming Pool Study completed by Gremmer & Associates. We saw no reason to duplicate efforts, and used it as a guiding document. That study recommended a pool facility between 12,000 and 16,000 square feet, based on the 2000 population of 19,900. The 2016 city population is slightly smaller at 19,200. The final concept presented had a total pool area of 15,369 square feet. That is toward the higher end of the 2000 study recommendation. We believe this facility will draw attendees from a larger population than just the city of Marshfield, as there are limited alternatives in the area. The new Wisconsin Rapids facility will draw some as well, but they are more adjacent patron zones, versus overlapping. This underserved area supports the larger facility. The capacity of pool patrons is determined by the State of Wisconsin’s Department of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Protection, specifically code ATCP 76.25 which allows one patron per 15 square feet of shallow water and one per 25 square feet of deep water, with additional calculations for diving areas. The building dimensions on the concept plan are approximately 50’x150’, at 6,055 square feet. Building dimensions can vary greatly, as they may house additional flex space and meeting rooms, or indoor concessions, in addition to the minimum requirements for restroom facilities and mechanicals. The building shown is perhaps 20% larger than the absolute minimum square footage required for just restrooms and mechanicals, and a minimal concessions kitchen. Additional site statistics, beyond those given on the concept plan: 800lf perimeter fence Enclosed area within fence = 65,000sf (25,000sf lawn, 15,000sf pool, 25,000sf concrete deck) Lap pool is 42’x75’ (six lane, 25 yard pool) Activity pool is 120’x160’ at the longest dimensions Parking lot is 164 spaces (assume 1 space/100sf pool are plus employees) Parking lot is 170’x470’

Blake Theisen, PLA, ASLA Landscape Architect Ayres Associates Direct: 608.441.3569 • Mobile: 608.886.6808 TheisenB@AyresAssociates.com www.AyresAssociates.com

Item Existing Faciltiy Proposed Facility +/-

Water Surface Area (sf) 12,700 15,169 2,469Bather Load (# patrons) 802 959 157Gallons 366,000 293,150 -72,850Bathhouse Area (sf) 4,425 6,055 1,630 Family Changing Rooms (#) 0 2 2 Concessions (#) 0 1 1 Game Rooms (#) 0 1 1 Toilets (#) 7 14 7 Showers (#) 6 16 10 Sinks (#) 6 15 9Area Inside Fence (sf) 33,300 66,050 32,750Shelters (#) 0 2 2Parking Stalls 44 166 122Pool Amenities (#) 5 17 12 Diving Boards (#) 1 2 1 Slides (#) 0 3 3 Basketball Hoops (#) 0 2 2 Climbing Walls (#) 0 1 1 Lifeguard Stands 4 7 3 Water Journey 0 1 1 Water Play Structure 0 1 1

Hefko Pool - Existing and Proposed Facility Comparison

Potential Pool SitesCity of Marshfield

This is not a legal survey document. This map was compiled by theCity of Marshfield’s Geographic Information System based on interpretation of resources to the date printed herein, duplication without consent is prohibited.

3/3/2017

Marathon CoWood Co

Marathon CoWood Co

Draxle

r Dr

1617

18

19

20

6

7

4

5

9

11 1213

10

8

15

14

32

1

Potential Pool SitesUS HighwaysState HighwayCounty HighwayLocal RoadsPrivate RoadsRailroadAirportCounty Boundary

0 0.5 10.25Miles

Document Path: F:\Home\GIS\Depts\Parks\proj\PoolRelocation\PPS.mxd

Option Number Name Of Site Approximate

Acres1 Hefko Pool 6.752 Weinbrenner Shoe Factory 2.493 Felker Bros. 5.514 W 14th St & S Adams Ave 11.285 E Arnold St & N Peach Ave 4.386 Upper Pond 22.097 Street Department 6.058 First Presbyterian Church 11.469 S Lincoln Ave & W Arlington St 7.410 W 17th St & S Adams Ave 5.0111 Griese Park 7.1912 Washington Ave & E 22nd St 16.2513 Prachyak Wayside 5.714 Old United Rental Site 4.3915 Braem Park 33.3416 2215 S Maple Ave 27.3817 City Material Storage 8.8418 Fairgrounds 17.819 South of Griese Park 2020 Weber's Farm 10

2017 Potential Pool Sites – Development Services Comments SITE PROS CONS

1. Hefko Pool Good visibility Appears to be enough property for proposed plan Consider including properties to the immediate north 2. Weinbrenner Shoe Factory Existing historic building and active business EDB has identified this site for possible redevelopment that

would not include this type of use Not great visibility The site is not big enough 3. Felker Bros. Good visibility Lots of property owners Eliminates blighted property Close to railroad The pool would fit well into the Downtown Master

Redevelopment Plan for this site Would have to vacate Depot Street

4. W 14th St & S Adams Ave Wetlands Being rezoned for residential development Vacate Drake and Columbus 5. E Arnold St and S Peach Ave Contamination Multiple property owners Vacate alley and right-of-way

Existing business there Close to railroad 6. Upper Pond Currently filled with water Potential height restrictions for airport 7. Street Department Good visibility Costly relocation of existing services Complimentary to existing SJ Miller Park The pool would fit well into the Downtown Master

Redevelopment Plan for this site

8. First Presbyterian Eliminates agricultural concerns for existing residents Not much visibility Could have access lining up with 4th St with an entrance onto

Cypress Embedded in a residential neighborhood

9. S Lincoln Ave & W Arlington St Consider extension of Park and Schmidt to make that site work Site design does not allow good visibility Close proximity to Weber Farm Site would need a complete master plan 10. W 17th & Adams Ave Site is too narrow and small and in a drainage way Should not be considered 11. Griese Park Could be complimentary for Griese Park Wetland delineation would be needed Not the best visibility

12. Washington Ave & E 22nd St No access or infrastructure would have to be added Lacks visibility More suitable for residential development 13. Prachyak Wayside Good visibility Religious statue concerns Alano Club Concerns Nothing too appealing in this location 14. Old United Rental Site Next to future trail Consider acquiring pet store to the south Multi options for access Might be a little small Decent visibility 15. Braem Park Great visibility Take out a lot of trees Help to rejuvenate the park Wetlands and storm water ravine 16. 2215 S Maple Ave – Trailer Park Relocation nightmare

17. City Material Storage Not an option 18. Fairgrounds Centralized Clean up fairgrounds parking area 19. South of Griese Park Would be a great

compliment to Griese Park Would have to cut down a lot of trees

Just across the street and south of 29th in Marshfield Utilities land

Might be within wellhead protection area

Wetland delineation would be needed 20. 14th St. & Lincoln Ave (SW)