UFRAS University Facilities Risk Assessment Spreadsheet 22 June 2011
City Facilities Risk Assessment
-
Upload
city-of-college-station -
Category
Government & Nonprofit
-
view
771 -
download
1
Transcript of City Facilities Risk Assessment
![Page 1: City Facilities Risk Assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062704/5562ab8ed8b42a15548b4f8b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
City Facilities Risk AssessmentSEPTEMBER 2014
![Page 2: City Facilities Risk Assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062704/5562ab8ed8b42a15548b4f8b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
How did we find City Hall to be highest risk?• City of Austin facility risk assessment
• 36 Facility condition assessments
• General liability claims
• 2012 ADA facilities inspection report
• 2013 employee survey
• Facility utility costs
![Page 3: City Facilities Risk Assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062704/5562ab8ed8b42a15548b4f8b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
OBJECTIVES
• Safety & Security
• ADA compliance
• Financial costs/efficiencies
• Operational deficiencies
WHAT WE DID
• 81 Interviews & site observations
• Safety, security, ADA mitigation
• Financial cost analysis
• Historical review
![Page 4: City Facilities Risk Assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062704/5562ab8ed8b42a15548b4f8b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
1969Center wing
Population 17,676Square footage: 8,836
1979South wing Pop. 36,188ft2: 17,041
1983North wingPop. 44,864ft2: 36,881
City Hall History2014Current
Pop. 101,648ft2: 36,881
![Page 5: City Facilities Risk Assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062704/5562ab8ed8b42a15548b4f8b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
2020Est. Pop: 120,144
2014Pop. 101,648
Staff - 907
2009Pop. 93,450Staff - 935
2003Pop. 78,309Staff - 806
1997Pop. 61,646Staff - 717
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
-3%
-2%
-1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
Population & Staff Growth Comparison
% Change Employee % Change Population
![Page 6: City Facilities Risk Assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062704/5562ab8ed8b42a15548b4f8b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
“Space for everyone is bursting at the seams.”
“When it rains, water leaks in the elevator and under the doors in the hallway...”
“Part of the facility is almost 50 years old...”
“There is nothing to stop people [from] just walking into offices.”
![Page 7: City Facilities Risk Assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062704/5562ab8ed8b42a15548b4f8b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Q1: City Hall meets the needs of my department.Average - 2.64Somewhat disagree
Q2: City Hall meets my needs as an employee. Average - 2.23Somewhat agree
Q3: City Hall meets the needs of citizens.Average - 2.51Somewhat disagree
Q4: City Hall is a well maintained facility. Average - 2.62Somewhat disagree
![Page 8: City Facilities Risk Assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062704/5562ab8ed8b42a15548b4f8b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Top health & safety concern
Air quality - 65%
Emergency evacuation - 26%
Sanitation - 26%
Parking lot conditions - 21%
Infestation - 19%
Maintenance - 16%
![Page 9: City Facilities Risk Assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062704/5562ab8ed8b42a15548b4f8b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Top security concerns
Citizen access to facility - 52%
Preventative security measures - 47%
Unauthorized employee access - 12%
Visibility - 11%
Building free flow - 11%
![Page 10: City Facilities Risk Assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062704/5562ab8ed8b42a15548b4f8b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Other concerns
Space - 57%HVAC system - 48%
Energy efficiency - 25%Way findings & signs - 23%
Department efficiency - 20%Building aesthetic - 11%Technological needs - 9%
Break room & bathrooms - 6%ADA compliancy - 4%
![Page 11: City Facilities Risk Assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062704/5562ab8ed8b42a15548b4f8b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
ADA Safety Security Total0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
17
711
35
412
16
Mitigated Recommendations
Unmitigated Mitigated
![Page 12: City Facilities Risk Assessment](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062704/5562ab8ed8b42a15548b4f8b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
What are the City’s Options?• Option 1: Accept the identified risks • $100,000 (O&M expenditures)• $100,000 (utility expense)
• Option 2: Invest in current facility• $2.144 million (recommended capital expenditures)• Safety, security, ADA, capacity . . . . ?
• Option 3: Fund a new facility