City College Department of BIOLOGY · Organismic Biology 22800 Ecology and Evolution 22900 Cell and...
Transcript of City College Department of BIOLOGY · Organismic Biology 22800 Ecology and Evolution 22900 Cell and...
Last revised, Spring 2012
Mission Statement
In the last two decades there have been seismic changes in the Biological Sciences.
The mission of the Department of Biology at The City College of New York is to conduct
research in these areas, to enable students from diverse backgrounds to further their
intellectual development and to prepare them to enter professions in the biological and
biomedical sciences. We also contribute to the broader community by continuing collaborations
with community colleges and K-12 schools.
Consistent with recent scientific breakthroughs, we provide comprehensive biological training
that focuses on core content and principles, using an array of approaches and an evolving
set of intellectual tools. Our core curriculum emphasizes learning about the many principles
of biology and the ability to use the scientific method to gain new understanding. Evolution
is emphasized as an organizing theme throughout the curriculum. Most core courses and
many electives include laboratory sections, which are inquiry-based to promote learning,
practicing, and refining scientific analytical skills. A wide range of elective courses allows the
student to investigate a variety of biological processes and phenomena and to explore the
relationships among organisms. One of the Biology Department’s strengths is the integration
of undergraduate students into faculty research programs. As biological research becomes
increasingly collaborative and interdisciplinary, we endeavor to train students to apply
their knowledge in new contexts. Qualified advanced students are encouraged to take
Independent Study or Honors (research) and may also take selected graduate courses.
City CollegeDepartment of BIOLOGY
Last revised, Spring 2012
Learning Outcomes
Students with a B.A. in Biology will
Summarize lecture content and identify key principles
Formulate questions, design expteriments, test hypothesis and interpret results
Perform experiments using lab equipment used in research
Represent data with graphs or maps
Demonstrate concept of statistical significance
Write reports in the format of a sceintific paper
Make oral presentation of scientific topic
Search and understand primary literature
Relate course content to clinical or ecological case studies or current research
Explain modern biological concepts to a non-biologist
Use mathematical models or computer simulations
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Last revised, Spring 2012
Learning Outcome Grid(Outcomes are numbered from 1 to 11 as listed below)
Courses Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
10000 Biology
(Non-Science Majors)
10100 Biological
Foundations I
10200
Biological Foundations
20600 Introduction to
Genetics
20700
Organismic Biology
22800
Ecology and Evolution
22900 Cell and
Molecular Biology
28000
Biomolecular systems
33000 Natural History
of Vertebrates
34000 Biology of
Invertebrates
35400 Introduction to
Neurobiology
35500 Analysis of
Scientific Literature
37500 Dev. Biology
37900
Dev. Neuroscience
34500 Botany
35000 Microbiology
X
X X X X
X
X
X X X X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X X
X X X
X X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
XX
X
X
X
X
X X
X XX
X
X
X X
X X X
X X
X X
X
X
X X X X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X X
X
X X
X X
X
YRS 1,2 AND EVERY FALL
(206 AND 207 YR5)
YRS 3 AND 5
YRS 2,4,5 AS OFFERED
1. Summarize lecture content and identify key principles
2. Formulate questions, design expteriments, test
hypothesis and interpret results
3. Perform experiments using lab equipment used in
research
4. Represent data with graphs or maps
5. Demonstrate concept of statistical significance
6. Write reports in the format of a sceintific paper
7. Make oral presentation of scientific topic8. Search and understand primary literature9. Relate course content to clinical or ecological case
studies or current research10. Explain modern biological concepts to a non-
biologist11. Use mathematical models or computer simulations
Last revised, Spring 2012
Learning Outcome Grid(Outcomes are numbered from 1 to 11 as listed above)
Courses Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
38000
Eukaryotic Genetics
40000 Physiol. &
Functional Anat. I
40100 Physiol. &
Functional Anat. II
40200 Physiol. &
Functional Anat. III
41000 Cell Dev. &
Cellular Senescence
42500
Cancer Biology
44300 Insect Ecology
44900 Biology of Birds
45100
Muscle and Movement
45300
Conservation Biology
45400
Sensory Perception
45800 Biogeography
46000 Animal Behavior
48500 Evolution
45900 Biological
Oceanography
48300 Laboratory in
Biotechnology
45500
Advanced Ecology
X X X X X X X X XX
X X
X X X X XX X
X X XX
X XX
X
X X X X X
X X X X X XX
X X X X X XX X X X
X
X
X
X
X X X X X
X X X XX X X
XX X X
X X XXX
X X
X X X X
X X
X X
X X X
X
X X X
X X
X X X X X X X
X
X X
X
YRS 2,4,5 AS OFFERED
Division of Science Rubrics for Assessing Program Outcomes BIOLOGY
Program Outcome 1: Summarize lecture content and identify key principles
Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding
Equivalent grade F C B A
1.1: Can only apply scientific principles to problem solving with guidance; cannot reach solutions or makes many mistakes when solving problems.
Can identify appropriate scientific principles in developing problem solutions; able to solve problem but makes minor mistakes.
Demonstrates thorough knowledge of scientific principles and applies them correctly to solve engineering problems.
Can also determine whether answer is appropriate to problem.
1.2: Can only apply mathematic principles to problem solving with guidance; cannot reach solutions or makes many mistakes when solving problems.
Can identify appropriate mathematical principles to solve problem; able to solve problem but makes minor mistakes.
Can apply mathematical principles correctly to engineering problems and some problems without errors.
Can also determine whether answer is appropriate to problem.
Measurement Selected homework, projects, or exams.
Adaptation to course Instructor should identify scientific and mathematical techniques that are appropriate for their course
Program Outcome 2: Formulate questions, design experiments, test hypothesis and interpret results
Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding
Equivalent grade F C B A
2.1: Ability to formulate questions
Cannot formulate an experimental plan that matches the objective; cannot select appropriate tools; unaware of uncertainty
Formulates an incomplete experimental plan; needs guidance in selecting appropriate tools; is aware of sources of uncertainty but does not account for them or does so poorly
Formulates an adequate experimental plan; selects adequate tools; aware of sources of uncertainty and able to account for them
Formulates a comprehensive experimental plan; selects appropriate tools; aware of sources of error and uncertainty and accounts for them in the plan
2.2: Ability to design an experiment
Objective and hypothesis are poorly defined; Does not or is unable to explain how experiment will meet objective; Procedure and data tables have not been prepared in advance or are unclear; Unable to complete experiment; Recorded data is incomplete or incorrect
Objective and hypothesis are poorly defined; Unable to clearly explain relationship between experiment and objective; Procedure and data tables are prepared in advance but are not clear or organized; Able to complete experiment; Recorded data is mostly complete and correct
Can state a basic objective and hypothesis; Able to explain basic relationship between experiment and objective; Procedure and data tables are prepared in advance and are reasonably clear and organized but not concise; Able to complete experiment; Recorded data is complete and correct
Can state the full objective; Able to explain full relationship between experiment and hypothesis; Procedure and data tables are prepared in advance and are clear, organized and concise; Able to complete experiment; Recorded data is complete, correct, and well organized
2.3: Ability to test hypotheses
Mathematically analyzes data incorrectly
Mathematically analyzes data correctly; Makes interpretations of results that are incomplete
Makes interpretations of results that are correct; Also explains whether and why the objective was met and the hypothesis was correct
Also comments on effect of error or uncertainty in interpretation of results; Explains the larger significance of the experiment and its results
2.4: Ability to interpret results
Measurement B1 and 2; Lab reports; B3: Assignment
Adaptation B1 and B3 will only apply to more advanced courses; instructor should define appropriate tools for B1
Program Outcome 3: Perform experiments using lab equipment used in research
Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding
Equivalent grade F C B A
3.1: Ability to perform experiments using equipment used in research
Tries to develop a solution without defining problem
Has trouble starting, incomplete definition, little understanding of constraints
Develops a scope, some objectives, and some constraints
Develops scope, constraints, and objectives with no preconceptions
3.2: Evaluate solution Jumps to a solution with no other steps; does not recognize that there may be several "correct" solutions
Alternative solutions are weakly developed
Develops alternative based on examples in class solution
Has several well developed solutions; one or more solutions are innovative
Can not support solution; shows no or little knowledge of codes
Incomplete evaluation; stops with one or two strong points
Evaluates solution against some objectives and/or constraints, but not complete
Does a thorough evaluation against objectives and constraints and can support choice; includes likely societal or environmental impacts
Measurement Project or assignment; may require submission of intermediate steps.
Program Outcome 4: Represent data with graphs or maps
Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding
Equivalent grade F C B A
4.1: Plot data in graphs or maps
Waited for others to make suggestions or expected to be told what to do
Contributed ideas occasionally
Contributed ideas on most or all occasions
Not only contributed their own ideas but suggested how to improve other team members' ideas
Tried to dominate discussion or ignored what others were saying
Listened to others. Listened to others and encouraged others to talk; asked team members for information from their area or assignments.
Helped lead useful discussions by making sure that each member contributed and the group stayed on topic; helped to avert arguments
Failed on several occasions to have their work done
Had to be repeatedly reminded or missed meetings or interim due dates
Had all work done on time and was on time for all meetings
Had all work done on time and was available to help other team members
Tried to minimize their share of the work; never helped another team member
Did their share of the work
Did more than their share of the work by taking on additional tasks or helping other team members
Did more than their share and kept on eye on the project as a whole
Measurement Peer evaluation by students within teams; in some courses, observation of students.
Program Outcome 5: Demonstrate concept of statistical significance
Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding
Equivalent grade F C B A
5.1: Ability to evaluate problems using statistical significane
Unable to identify most important features of problem to account for; Unable to break problem into solvable components; Unable to identify uncertainty or state assumptions
Able to identify some important features of problem to account for; Breaks problem into components that are not necessarily solvable; Able to identify some uncertainties and assumptions
Able to identify most features of problem to account for; Breaks problem into solvable components; Able to identify most important uncertainties and assumptions
Able to identify all features of problem to account for; Breaks problem into solvable components; Able to identify all important uncertainties and assumptions
Unable to solve problems similar to those done in class; Unable to solve other problems without guidance
Able to solve problems similar to those done in class; Able to solve other problems with guidance
Able to solve problems that are variations of those done in class without guidance
Able to solve problems that are different from those done in class without guidance
E2: Ability to evaluate validity of results
Unable to identify whether results are reasonable, Unable to explain significance of results, Unable to identify how results would differ if different approach was used to solve problem
Able to identify whether results are reasonable, Able to explain significance of results, Able to identify how results would differ if different approach was used to solve problem
Also uses unit analysis to check results
Also uses independent methods to check results; Also able to use results to make recommendations
Measurement Project or targeted homework
Adaptation Type of problem should be pertinent to course.
Program Outcome 6: Write reports in the format of a scientific paper
Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding
Equivalent grade F C B A
6.1: Can structure a paper, report, or memo to communicate their ideas
Can not organize ideas; important information left out; jumps from topic to topic with no order
Main ideas are clear; Proper information provided in each section. Data in tables and figures explained in text.
Paper is well structured; text explains theoretical and conceptual justifications for work.
Paper is also concise, and convincing
6.2: Can write in grammatically correct fashion
Written work is full of grammatical and spelling errors; no references when references are needed
Written work has few grammatical or spelling errors
Written work is grammatically correct and has no spelling errors
Written work is exceptionally clear and easy to read.
6.3: Can format and present written work appropriately
Written work does not follow required format; Drawings, figures, and tables not prepared with proper software.
Report follows required format with abstract, introduction, procedure, results, analysis of results, and conclusion. Tables, figures, and equations are provided.
Report gives technical references other than textbook. Equations, tables, and figures are properly labeled and well presented.
Paragraph titles, equations, figures, tables and footnotes are well formatted and presented. Report looks professional.
6.4: Can provide correct technical content
Concepts are misunderstood. Calculations are incorrect. Results are inconsistent.
Calculations are correct. Report provides an interpretation of results.
Analysis of results is solid. Explanations for observed results are provided and supported
Student shows thorough understanding of concepts and is able to relate data and results to material covered in class
Measurement Written homework and reports
Program Outcome 7: Make oral presentation of scientific topic
7.2: Ability to present quantitative information
Poor choice of presentation method for information to be presented; tables and figures difficult to interpret; information in table not relevant to text
Tables and figures not labeled or units not given; not discussed in text
Tables and figures correctly and completely labeled and readable; discussed in text
Tables and figures correct, readable, and convincing; graphical presentation is appealing.
Measurement Reports
Program Outcome 8: Search and understand primary literature
Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding
Equivalent grade F C B A
8.1: Ability to search primary literature
Poor choice of material to present; relevance not clear; no introduction or conclusion; poor or no slides
Presents important material; slides present relevant information
Well organized talk leading to important conclusion; slides present relevant material in concise and convincing manner
Well organized talk leading to important conclusion; slides present relevant material in concise and convincing manner; can handle questions and interruptions well
8.2: Ability to understand primary literature
Does not speak loud enough, faces screen, rather than audience, slouches or has annoying mannerism
Speaks loud enough, stands erect
Uses voice effectively and addresses audience clearly
Projects an image of competence and professionally
Measurement Oral presentations
Program Outcome 9: Relate course content to clinical or ecological case studies or current research
Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding
Equivalent grade F C B A
9.1: Ability to relate course content to real world applications
Unaware of general or specific impacts of an engineering action relevant to course
Identifies general impacts relevent to course and explains why they occur
Also identifies specific impacts relevent to course and explains why they occur
Also uses impacts to recommend alternate solutions to a course problem
Measurement Design or research projects, exams, homework assignments
Adaptation to course Instructor should choose environmental, economic, and/or societal impacts as appropriate to course.
Program Outcome 10: Explain modern biological concepts to a non-biologist
Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding
Equivalent grade F C B A
10.1: Ability to explain modern biological concepts to a non-biologist
Is ignorant of or shows no interest in professional and technical organizations
Occasionally participates in professional and technical organizations
Also joins professional and technical organizations
Also takes on leadership roles in professional and technical organizations
I2: Relies on class notes, textbook and instructor for most information
Inconsistently draws upon outside sources of information; unable to or does not judge whether sources are credible
Inconsistently draws upon outside sources of information that are credible
Consistently draws upon credible outside sources of information
Measurement I1: Membership in student or professional organizations; I2: Projects, homework assignments
Program Outcome 11: Use mathematical models or computer simulations
Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding
Equivalent grade F C B A
11.1: Unaware of most contemporary issues relevant to course
Identifies all contemporary issues relevant to course
Also explains the relationship between issues and course topics
Also uses issues to recommend alternate solutions to a course problem
Measurement Design or research projects, exams, homework assignments
Adaptation to course Possible issues: Environmental impacts, global warming, energy use, community development, earthquakes, weather trends, safety, building code developments
http://gradsurvey.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/
CCNY SCIENCE DIVISION ADVISING OFFICEPost-Graduation Exit Survey
*Your name:
*Your e-mail(1):
*Graduation Date:
1. What’s your next step after graduating. (Check all that apply)
Stayinschool
Lookforajob
Employed
Don’tknow/Prefernottoanswer
2. Staying in touch.
Yes,Iwouldliketostayintouchwiththecollege.IauthorizeaCCNY
representativetocontactmewithinthenext12months.
If you prefer someone to contact you please indicate person’s name and department below:
Contact’s Name:
Department:
* Required Answers
(1)Anemailmessagewithaconfirmationlinkwillbesenttotheaddressyouspecify.Clicking
onthelinkwillberequiredtocompletethissurvey.
For best experience, please use with Chrome, Firefox 10, Safari 5, or IE v 9 or 10.
Month: Year:
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
MASTERS STUDENT SURVEY
How can the Division of Science better serve you?
Your E-Mail Address (Optional)
Question 1
In which discipline will you be earning your masters degree?
Biology
Math
EAS
Physics
Biochemistry
Chemistry
Science education
Other
Question 2
What is your specific area of study?
Question 3a
What stimulated your desire to earn a masters degree?
I needed the degree for my job
I needed the degree for a job for which I plan to apply
I am using the masters as a bridge to PhD study
This degree is purely for self improvement
other
Question 3b
Explain your answer to 3a here (if you have chosen ‘other’ or if you have more to tell us.)
characters remaining
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
Question 4
Who is your primary advisor/mentor?
Question 5
What kind of masters are you pursuing?
research and thesis
exam
certificate
education (30 over)
education specialization
other
Question 6
When is your expected graduation?
prior to spring 2012
Spring 12
Summer 12
Fall 12
Spring 13
Summer 13
Fall 13
Beyond 2013
Question 7
Are you planning to pursue a Ph.D.?
yes
No
Undecided
Question 8
If yes to question 7, identify your research area of interest (currently).
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
Question 9
If yes to question 7, to which Universities HAVE YOU ALREADY APPLIED? Provide name and
indicate whether you have been accepted.
Question 9a
If you have not yet applied to PhD programs, please indicate programs to which you are
planning to apply.
Question 10
What specific profession are you pursuing?
Question 11
What do like best about your masters study at CCNY? (list as many items as can fit in 300
characters!)
Question 12
How satisfied are you with the ease of meeting with an advisor?
dissatisfied
somewhat satisfied
satisfied
very satisfied
beyond expectation
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
Question 13
How satisfied are you with the academic advising you receive?
dissatisfied
somewhat satisfied
satisfied
very satisfied
beyond expectations
Question 14
How satisfied are you with advice and guidance concerning non-academic matters? (e.g.
career counseling, job placement, or other matters)
dissatisfied
somewhat satisfied
satisfied
very satisfied
beyond expectation
does not apply
Question 15
How satisfied are you with the registration process?
dissatisfied
somewhat satisfied
satisfied
very satisfied
beyond expectations
Question 16
What do you like least about your masters study at CCNY? (again, list all that can fit in 300
characters)
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
Question 17
Which if any core facilities do you use? How satisfied are you with the core facilities?
Question 18
What if anything would you change regarding your masters experience at CCNY? (300 characters)
Question 19
What is your gender? (Optional)
male
female
Question 20
What is your ethnicity? (Optional)
African American
Asian
Caucasian
Latina
other
do not want to answer
Question 21
Do you currently work full time? (Optional)
Yes
No, only part time
No, not at all
How can we serve you better?
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/administration/deans-office/
STUDENT INFORMATION
This database will enable us to keep in touch with all of our Science majors-graduates
Dear Advisors,
Thank you for submitting this information to this student contact database. Please
update the contact information as needed.
Last Name
First Name
Street Address
City, State, Zip
Cell Phone
Best email
major
choose one
Entry Semester
Date (semester) of declaration of major
Expected Semester of Graduation
Last revised, Spring 2012
Mission Statement
To provide excellent teaching to our students and to conduct top quality research, the department will:
1. Educatestudentsinthechemistrydisciplineattheundergraduate,andmaster’slevels,to
preparethemforprofessionalcareers.
2. Supportfacultyandstudentsinperformingresearchatthevanguardofnewdirections
andopportunities.
3. Encouragenewthinkingaboutareasofspecialstrength,whichcanbecross-disciplinary.
4. Maintainascholasticallyexcellentfacultywhowillbeabletoeducateourdiversestudentbody.
Learning Outcomes
Students with a B.A. in Chemistry will
1. Demonstrateanunderstandingofthefundamentalprinciplesofchemistry,includingatomic
andmolecularstructure,quantumchemistry,chemicalbonding,stoichiometry,kineticsand
mechanism,equilibrium,thermochemistryandthermodynamics,molecularstructureand
function,electrochemistry,andtheperiodicchemicalpropertiesoftheelements.
2. Applythefundamentalprinciplesofchemistrytolifesciences,theenvironment,materials,
engineering,andemergingtechnologicalfieldsofchemistry,aswellastoeverydaysituations.
3. Conductexperimentsandlearnfundamentallaboratoryskills.
4. Analyzeandinterpretdata.
5. Applymathematicalconceptstochemicalproblems.
6. Workaspartofaproblem-solvingteam.
7. Conveyfacts,theoriesandresultsaboutchemistryinwrittenform.
8. Presentorallytoconveyfacts,theoriesandresultsaboutchemistry.
9. Accessandutilizechemicalinformationtechnology.
10.Designandexecutescientificresearch.
11.Applyethicalresponsibilitiesandprofessionalconduct.
City CollegeDepartment of CHEMISTRY
Last revised, Spring 2012
Learning Outcome Grid(Outcomes are numbered from 1 to 11 as listed above)
CoursesNon-Science Majors; Engineering; Undergraduate & Master’s level course
Learning Outcomes
1
X X
X X X
X X
X
X
X X XX X X
X X X
X X
X X X X
X X
X X
X X X X
X
X X X X
X
X X X
X X X
X
X
X X
X X
X
X X
X X
X
X X
X
X X
X
X X
X
X X
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
100.00: Chemistry and Society (non-majors)
103.01:General Chemistry I
104.01:General Chemistry II
243.00: Quantitative Analysis
261.00: Organic Lecture I
262.00: Organic Lab I (non-majors)
263.00:Organic Lecture II
272.00:Organic Lab I
311.14 (459):Biochemistry Lecture
311.15 (459): Biochemistry Lab
330.00: Phys. Chem I Lecture
331.00:Phys. Chem. Lab I
332.00:Phys. Chem Lecture II
210.00: Applied Chemistry For Biomedical Eng. - (Engineering Majors)
335.00 : Physical Biochemistry
374.00:Organic Lab II
Last revised, Spring 2012
Learning Outcome Grid(Outcomes are numbered from 1 to 11 as listed above)
Courses Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
434.00:Physical Chem. Lab II
30100-303.00:Honors Research
A1100: Environmental Chemistry
A1101: Environmental Chemistry Lab
A1200: Environmental Organic Chem.
A-8005: Biochemistry II
C-0200: Inorganic Chemistry
B5000: Organic Mechanism
310.01-310.04:Independent Study
X X X X X X X X
X X X
X X XXX
X
X
X
X X
X X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X X
X
X
Division of Science Rubrics for Assessing Program Outcomes CHEMISTRY
Program Outcome 1: Know fundamental principles
Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding
Equivalent grade F C B A
1.1: Can only apply scientific principles to problem solving with guidance; cannot reach solutions or makes many mistakes when solving problems.
Can identify appropriate scientific principles in developing problem solutions; able to solve problem but makes minor mistakes.
Demonstrates thorough knowledge of scientific principles and applies them correctly to solve engineering problems.
Can also determine whether answer is appropriate to problem.
1.2: Can only apply mathematic principles to problem solving with guidance; cannot reach solutions or makes many mistakes when solving problems.
Can identify appropriate mathematical principles to solve problem; able to solve problem but makes minor mistakes.
Can apply mathematical principles correctly to engineering problems and some problems without errors.
Can also determine whether answer is appropriate to problem.
Measurement Selected homework, projects, or exams.
Adaptation to course Instructor should identify scientific and mathematical techniques that are appropriate for their course
Program Outcome 2: Apply fundamental principles to life science, environment and emerging
fields of chemistry Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding
Equivalent grade F C B A
2.1: Ability to Cannot formulate an experimental plan that matches the objective; cannot select appropriate tools; unaware of uncertainty
Formulates an incomplete experimental plan; needs guidance in selecting appropriate tools; is aware of sources of uncertainty but does not account for them or does so poorly
Formulates an adequate experimental plan; selects adequate tools; aware of sources of uncertainty and able to account for them
Formulates a comprehensive experimental plan; selects appropriate tools; aware of sources of error and uncertainty and accounts for them in the plan
2.2: Ability to design an experiment
Objective and hypothesis are poorly defined; Does not or is unable to explain how experiment will meet objective; Procedure and data tables have not been prepared in advance or are unclear; Unable to complete experiment; Recorded data is incomplete or incorrect
Objective and hypothesis are poorly defined; Unable to clearly explain relationship between experiment and objective; Procedure and data tables are prepared in advance but are not clear or organized; Able to complete experiment; Recorded data is mostly complete and correct
Can state a basic objective and hypothesis; Able to explain basic relationship between experiment and objective; Procedure and data tables are prepared in advance and are reasonably clear and organized but not concise; Able to complete experiment; Recorded data is complete and correct
Can state the full objective; Able to explain full relationship between experiment and hypothesis; Procedure and data tables are prepared in advance and are clear, organized and concise; Able to complete experiment; Recorded data is complete, correct, and well organized
2.3: Ability to test hypotheses
Mathematically analyzes data incorrectly
Mathematically analyzes data correctly; Makes interpretations of results that are incomplete
Makes interpretations of results that are correct; Also explains whether and why the objective was met and the hypothesis was correct
Also comments on effect of error or uncertainty in interpretation of results; Explains the larger significance of the experiment and its results
2.4: Ability to interpret results
Measurement B1 and 2; Lab reports; B3: Assignment
Adaptation B1 and B3 will only apply to more advanced courses; instructor should define appropriate tools for B1
Program Outcome 3: Ability to conduct experiments
Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding
Equivalent grade F C B A
3.1: Ability to perform experiments
Tries to develop a solution without defining problem
Has trouble starting, incomplete definition, little understanding of constraints
Develops a scope, some objectives, and some constraints
Develops scope, constraints, and objectives with no preconceptions
Jumps to a solution with no other steps; does not recognize that there may be several "correct" solutions
Alternative solutions are weakly developed
Develops alternative based on examples in class solution
Has several well developed solutions; one or more solutions are innovative
Can not support solution; shows no or little knowledge of codes
Incomplete evaluation; stops with one or two strong points
Evaluates solution against some objectives and/or constraints, but not complete
Does a thorough evaluation against objectives and constraints and can support choice; includes likely societal or environmental impacts
Measurement Project or assignment; may require submission of intermediate steps.
Program Outcome 4: Analyze and interpret data
Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding
Equivalent grade F C B A
4.1: Evaluate experimental solutions
Waited for others to make suggestions or expected to be told what to do
Contributed ideas occasionally
Contributed ideas on most or all occasions
Not only contributed their own ideas but suggested how to improve other team members' ideas
4.2: Data interpretation Tried to dominate discussion or ignored what others were saying
Listened to others. Listened to others and encouraged others to talk; asked team members for information from their area or assignments.
Helped lead useful discussions by making sure that each member contributed and the group stayed on topic; helped to avert arguments
4.3: Ability to evaluate validity of results
Failed on several occasions to have their work done
Had to be repeatedly reminded or missed meetings or interim due dates
Had all work done on time and was on time for all meetings
Had all work done on time and was available to help other team members
Tried to minimize their share of the work; never helped another team member
Did their share of the work
Did more than their share of the work by taking on additional tasks or helping other team members
Did more than their share and kept on eye on the project as a whole
Measurement Peer evaluation by students within teams; in some courses, observation of students.
Program Outcome 5: Apply mathematical concepts
Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding
Equivalent grade F C B A
5.1: Unable to identify most important features of problem to account for; Unable to break problem into solvable components; Unable to identify uncertainty or state assumptions
Able to identify some important features of problem to account for; Breaks problem into components that are not necessarily solvable; Able to identify some uncertainties and assumptions
Able to identify most features of problem to account for; Breaks problem into solvable components; Able to identify most important uncertainties and assumptions
Able to identify all features of problem to account for; Breaks problem into solvable components; Able to identify all important uncertainties and assumptions
Unable to solve problems similar to those done in class; Unable to solve other problems without guidance
Able to solve problems similar to those done in class; Able to solve other problems with guidance
Able to solve problems that are variations of those done in class without guidance
Able to solve problems that are different from those done in class without guidance
Unable to identify whether results are reasonable, Unable to explain significance of results, Unable to identify how results would differ if different approach was used to solve problem
Able to identify whether results are reasonable, Able to explain significance of results, Able to identify how results would differ if different approach was used to solve problem
Also uses unit analysis to check results
Also uses independent methods to check results; Also able to use results to make recommendations
Measurement Project or targeted homework
Adaptation Type of problem should be pertinent to course.
Program Outcome 6: Solve problems as part of a team
Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding
Equivalent grade F C B A
6.1: Ability to work as part of a team
Can not organize ideas; important information left out; jumps from topic to topic with no order
Main ideas are clear; Proper information provided in each section. Data in tables and figures explained in text.
Paper is well structured; text explains theoretical and conceptual justifications for work.
Paper is also concise, and convincing
6.2: Can write in grammatically correct fashion
Written work is full of grammatical and spelling errors; no references when references are needed
Written work has few grammatical or spelling errors
Written work is grammatically correct and has no spelling errors
Written work is exceptionally clear and easy to read.
6.3: Can format and present written work appropriately
Written work does not follow required format; Drawings, figures, and tables not prepared with proper software.
Report follows required format with abstract, introduction, procedure, results, analysis of results, and conclusion. Tables, figures, and equations are provided.
Report gives technical references other than textbook. Equations, tables, and figures are properly labeled and well presented.
Paragraph titles, equations, figures, tables and footnotes are well formatted and presented. Report looks professional.
6.4: Can provide correct technical content
Concepts are misunderstood. Calculations are incorrect. Results are inconsistent.
Calculations are correct. Report provides an interpretation of results.
Analysis of results is solid. Explanations for observed results are provided and supported
Student shows thorough understanding of concepts and is able to relate data and results to material covered in class
Measurement Written homework and reports
Program Outcome 7: Communicate in oral form
7.2: Ability to present quantitative information in oral form
Poor choice of presentation method for information to be presented; tables and figures difficult to interpret; information in table not relevant to text
Tables and figures not labeled or units not given; not discussed in text
Tables and figures correctly and completely labeled and readable; discussed in text
Tables and figures correct, readable, and convincing; graphical presentation is appealing.
Measurement Reports
Program Outcome 8: Communicate in written form
Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding
Equivalent grade F C B A
8.2: Can write in grammatically correct fashion
Poor choice of material to present; relevance not clear; no introduction or conclusion; poor or no slides
Presents important material; slides present relevant information
Well organized talk leading to important conclusion; slides present relevant material in concise and convincing manner
Well organized talk leading to important conclusion; slides present relevant material in concise and convincing manner; can handle questions and interruptions well
8.3: Can format and present written work appropriately
Does not speak loud enough, faces screen, rather than audience, slouches or has annoying mannerism
Speaks loud enough, stands erect
Uses voice effectively and addresses audience clearly
Projects an image of competence and professionally
8.4: Can provide correct technical content
Measurement Oral presentations
Program Outcome 9: Use chemical information technology
Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding
Equivalent grade F C B A
9.1: Ability to use online databases and instruments
Unaware of general or specific impacts of an engineering action relevant to course
Identifies general impacts relevent to course and explains why they occur
Also identifies specific impacts relevent to course and explains why they occur
Also uses impacts to recommend alternate solutions to a course problem
Measurement Design or research projects, exams, homework assignments
Adaptation to course Instructor should choose environmental, economic, and/or societal impacts as appropriate to course.
Program Outcome 10: Design and execute research
Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding
Equivalent grade F C B A
10.1: Ability to explain modern biological concepts to a non-biologist
Is ignorant of or shows no interest in professional and technical organizations
Occasionally participates in professional and technical organizations
Also joins professional and technical organizations
Also takes on leadership roles in professional and technical organizations
I2: Relies on class notes, textbook and instructor for most information
Inconsistently draws upon outside sources of information; unable to or does not judge whether sources are credible
Inconsistently draws upon outside sources of information that are credible
Consistently draws upon credible outside sources of information
Measurement I1: Membership in student or professional organizations; I2: Projects, homework assignments
Program Outcome 11: Conduct oneself ethically and responsibly
Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding
Equivalent grade F C B A
11.1: Unaware of most contemporary issues relevant to course
Identifies all contemporary issues relevant to course
Also explains the relationship between issues and course topics
Also uses issues to recommend alternate solutions to a course problem
Measurement Design or research projects, exams, homework assignments
Adaptation to course Possible issues: Environmental impacts, global warming, energy use, community development, earthquakes, weather trends, safety, building code developments
http://gradsurvey.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/
CCNY SCIENCE DIVISION ADVISING OFFICEPost-Graduation Exit Survey
*Your name:
*Your e-mail(1):
*Graduation Date:
1. What’s your next step after graduating. (Check all that apply)
Stayinschool
Lookforajob
Employed
Don’tknow/Prefernottoanswer
2. Staying in touch.
Yes,Iwouldliketostayintouchwiththecollege.IauthorizeaCCNY
representativetocontactmewithinthenext12months.
If you prefer someone to contact you please indicate person’s name and department below:
Contact’s Name:
Department:
* Required Answers
(1)Anemailmessagewithaconfirmationlinkwillbesenttotheaddressyouspecify.Clicking
onthelinkwillberequiredtocompletethissurvey.
For best experience, please use with Chrome, Firefox 10, Safari 5, or IE v 9 or 10.
Month: Year:
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
MASTERS STUDENT SURVEY
How can the Division of Science better serve you?
Your E-Mail Address (Optional)
Question 1
In which discipline will you be earning your masters degree?
Biology
Math
EAS
Physics
Biochemistry
Chemistry
Science education
Other
Question 2
What is your specific area of study?
Question 3a
What stimulated your desire to earn a masters degree?
I needed the degree for my job
I needed the degree for a job for which I plan to apply
I am using the masters as a bridge to PhD study
This degree is purely for self improvement
other
Question 3b
Explain your answer to 3a here (if you have chosen ‘other’ or if you have more to tell us.)
characters remaining
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
Question 4
Who is your primary advisor/mentor?
Question 5
What kind of masters are you pursuing?
research and thesis
exam
certificate
education (30 over)
education specialization
other
Question 6
When is your expected graduation?
prior to spring 2012
Spring 12
Summer 12
Fall 12
Spring 13
Summer 13
Fall 13
Beyond 2013
Question 7
Are you planning to pursue a Ph.D.?
yes
No
Undecided
Question 8
If yes to question 7, identify your research area of interest (currently).
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
Question 9
If yes to question 7, to which Universities HAVE YOU ALREADY APPLIED? Provide name and
indicate whether you have been accepted.
Question 9a
If you have not yet applied to PhD programs, please indicate programs to which you are
planning to apply.
Question 10
What specific profession are you pursuing?
Question 11
What do like best about your masters study at CCNY? (list as many items as can fit in 300
characters!)
Question 12
How satisfied are you with the ease of meeting with an advisor?
dissatisfied
somewhat satisfied
satisfied
very satisfied
beyond expectation
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
Question 13
How satisfied are you with the academic advising you receive?
dissatisfied
somewhat satisfied
satisfied
very satisfied
beyond expectations
Question 14
How satisfied are you with advice and guidance concerning non-academic matters? (e.g.
career counseling, job placement, or other matters)
dissatisfied
somewhat satisfied
satisfied
very satisfied
beyond expectation
does not apply
Question 15
How satisfied are you with the registration process?
dissatisfied
somewhat satisfied
satisfied
very satisfied
beyond expectations
Question 16
What do you like least about your masters study at CCNY? (again, list all that can fit in 300
characters)
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
Question 17
Which if any core facilities do you use? How satisfied are you with the core facilities?
Question 18
What if anything would you change regarding your masters experience at CCNY? (300 characters)
Question 19
What is your gender? (Optional)
male
female
Question 20
What is your ethnicity? (Optional)
African American
Asian
Caucasian
Latina
other
do not want to answer
Question 21
Do you currently work full time? (Optional)
Yes
No, only part time
No, not at all
How can we serve you better?
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/administration/deans-office/
STUDENT INFORMATION
This database will enable us to keep in touch with all of our Science majors-graduates
Dear Advisors,
Thank you for submitting this information to this student contact database. Please
update the contact information as needed.
Last Name
First Name
Street Address
City, State, Zip
Cell Phone
Best email
major
choose one
Entry Semester
Date (semester) of declaration of major
Expected Semester of Graduation
Last revised, Spring 2013
CHEMISTRY &BIOCHEMISTRY
Learning OutcomesStudents are expected to:
demonstrate an understanding of the fundamental principal of chemistry, including atomic
and molecular structure, quantum chemistry, chemical bonding stoichiometry, kinetics and
mechanism, equilibrium, thermochemistry and thermodynamics, molecular structure and
function, electrochemistry, and the periodic chemical properties of the elements;
apply fundamental principles of chemistry of life sciences, the environment, materials,
engineering, and emerging technological of chemistry, as well as to everyday situations;
conduct experiments and learn fundamental laboratory skills;
analyze and interpret data;
apply mathematical concepts to chemical problems;
work as part of a problem–solving team;
covey facts, theories and results about chemistry in written form;
present orally to convey facts, theories and results about chemistry;
access and utilize chemical information technology;
design and execute scientific research;
apply ethical responsibilities and professional conduct.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Masters’ Programs in
1
Mission StatementTo provide excellent teaching to our students and to conduct top quality research, the department will:
Educate students in the chemistry discipline at the undergraduate, and master’s levels, to
prepare them for professional careers.
Support faculty and students in performing research at the vanguard of new directions
and opportunities.
Encourage new thinking about areas of special strength, which can be cross-disciplinary.
Maintain a scholastically excellent faculty who will be able to educate our diverse
student body.
A.
B.
C.
D.
Last revised, Spring 2013
Course work UG Learning Outcomes1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
100.00 — Chemistry & Society
103.01 — General Chemistry 1
104.01 — General Chemistry 2
Engineering Majors
243.00 — Quantitative Analysis
261.00 — Organic Lecture 1
262.00 — Organic Lab 1 (non–majors)
263.00 — Organic Lecture 2
× ×
9 10 11
× × × × × ×
× × × × × ×
× ×
× ×× × × ×
×
× ×× × ×
×
272.00 — Organic Lab 1 × ×× × ×
311.14 (459) Biochemistry Lecture ×
311.15 (459) Biochemistry Lab × ×× × × × ×
330.00 — Phys Chem Lecture 1 × ×
331.00 — Phys Chem Lab 1 × ×× × × × × ×
331.00 — Phys Chem Lecture 2 × ×× × × × × ×
335.00 — Physical Biochemistry × ×× × × × × ×
374.00 — Organic Lab 2 × ×× × × × ×
434.00 — Physical Chem Lab 2 × × × × × × ×
Learning Outcome Grid(Outcomes are numbered from 1 to 11 as listed above)
2
Last revised, Spring 2013
Course work UG Learning Outcomes
Learning Outcome Grid(Outcomes are numbered from 1 to 11 as listed above)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
310.01–310.04 Independent Study ×× × × ×
9
×
10 11
×
×× × × × × × × ×30100–303.00 Honors Research
Masters Learning Outcomes1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
A1100Environmental Chemistry ×
9 10 11
× ×× × ×A1101Environmental Chemistry Lab
×A1200Environmental Organic Chem
A8005 — Biochemistry 2 × ×
C0200 — Inorganic Chemistry × ×
3
B5000 — Organic Mechanism × ×
http://gradsurvey.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/
CCNY SCIENCE DIVISION ADVISING OFFICEPost-Graduation Exit Survey
*Your name:
*Your e-mail(1):
*Graduation Date:
1. What’s your next step after graduating. (Check all that apply)
Stayinschool
Lookforajob
Employed
Don’tknow/Prefernottoanswer
2. Staying in touch.
Yes,Iwouldliketostayintouchwiththecollege.IauthorizeaCCNY
representativetocontactmewithinthenext12months.
If you prefer someone to contact you please indicate person’s name and department below:
Contact’s Name:
Department:
* Required Answers
(1)Anemailmessagewithaconfirmationlinkwillbesenttotheaddressyouspecify.Clicking
onthelinkwillberequiredtocompletethissurvey.
For best experience, please use with Chrome, Firefox 10, Safari 5, or IE v 9 or 10.
Month: Year:
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
MASTERS STUDENT SURVEY
How can the Division of Science better serve you?
Your E-Mail Address (Optional)
Question 1
In which discipline will you be earning your masters degree?
Biology
Math
EAS
Physics
Biochemistry
Chemistry
Science education
Other
Question 2
What is your specific area of study?
Question 3a
What stimulated your desire to earn a masters degree?
I needed the degree for my job
I needed the degree for a job for which I plan to apply
I am using the masters as a bridge to PhD study
This degree is purely for self improvement
other
Question 3b
Explain your answer to 3a here (if you have chosen ‘other’ or if you have more to tell us.)
characters remaining
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
Question 4
Who is your primary advisor/mentor?
Question 5
What kind of masters are you pursuing?
research and thesis
exam
certificate
education (30 over)
education specialization
other
Question 6
When is your expected graduation?
prior to spring 2012
Spring 12
Summer 12
Fall 12
Spring 13
Summer 13
Fall 13
Beyond 2013
Question 7
Are you planning to pursue a Ph.D.?
yes
No
Undecided
Question 8
If yes to question 7, identify your research area of interest (currently).
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
Question 9
If yes to question 7, to which Universities HAVE YOU ALREADY APPLIED? Provide name and
indicate whether you have been accepted.
Question 9a
If you have not yet applied to PhD programs, please indicate programs to which you are
planning to apply.
Question 10
What specific profession are you pursuing?
Question 11
What do like best about your masters study at CCNY? (list as many items as can fit in 300
characters!)
Question 12
How satisfied are you with the ease of meeting with an advisor?
dissatisfied
somewhat satisfied
satisfied
very satisfied
beyond expectation
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
Question 13
How satisfied are you with the academic advising you receive?
dissatisfied
somewhat satisfied
satisfied
very satisfied
beyond expectations
Question 14
How satisfied are you with advice and guidance concerning non-academic matters? (e.g.
career counseling, job placement, or other matters)
dissatisfied
somewhat satisfied
satisfied
very satisfied
beyond expectation
does not apply
Question 15
How satisfied are you with the registration process?
dissatisfied
somewhat satisfied
satisfied
very satisfied
beyond expectations
Question 16
What do you like least about your masters study at CCNY? (again, list all that can fit in 300
characters)
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
Question 17
Which if any core facilities do you use? How satisfied are you with the core facilities?
Question 18
What if anything would you change regarding your masters experience at CCNY? (300 characters)
Question 19
What is your gender? (Optional)
male
female
Question 20
What is your ethnicity? (Optional)
African American
Asian
Caucasian
Latina
other
do not want to answer
Question 21
Do you currently work full time? (Optional)
Yes
No, only part time
No, not at all
How can we serve you better?
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/administration/deans-office/
STUDENT INFORMATION
This database will enable us to keep in touch with all of our Science majors-graduates
Dear Advisors,
Thank you for submitting this information to this student contact database. Please
update the contact information as needed.
Last Name
First Name
Street Address
City, State, Zip
Cell Phone
Best email
major
choose one
Entry Semester
Date (semester) of declaration of major
Expected Semester of Graduation
Last revised, Spring 2012
Mission Statement
The Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences (EAS) of the City College of New York
integrates research, teaching, and service dedicated to inspire, educate and prepare students
to be leaders in the field of earth systems science. Based on the emerging awareness of the
interrelationships between natural and social systems EAS promotes and sustains:
• fundamental and innovative research for the understanding of the Earth as an integrated,
dynamic system.
• the integration of earth science and science education research to promote students’
learning as well as their awareness of the obligatory role of the environmental context in all
of their future endeavors.
Program goals
The following Program Education Goals are established to provide a quality education in Earth Systems Science:
1. Promote inquiry, analytical, technical, and communication skills necessary to succeed in the
earth and atmospheric science professions.
2. Promote scientific literacy and the critical thinking skills needed for continued, life-long learning.
3. Promote the understanding of ethical, economical and social issues as an integrated system,
necessary to recognize the need to include an evaluation of societal impact and consequences
of scientific development on policy matters.
4. Develop instructional and research collaborations with stakeholders.
5. Conduct research in areas of local, national, and global importance.
6. Promote a system’s approach in the integration of research and teaching.
7. Serve the community and the earth science profession.
8. Improve access for an increasingly diverse student body.
City CollegeDepartment of
EARTH & ATMOSPERICSCIENCE (EAS)
Last revised, Spring 2012
Learning Outcome Grid(Outcomes are numbered from 1 to 10 as listed below)
1. Design field research programs
2. Use computers for earth system science applications
3. Perform quantitative calculations
4. Reason scientifically in context of the earth system
5. Discuss issues and controversies in earth system
science
6. Identify and work with earth materials and earth
structures
7. Function well in team-coordinated activities
8. Identify, formulate and solve real world earth
science problems
9. Communicate effectively at all levels, orally and in
writing
10. Use earth science instruments
Courses Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
106 (B)Earth System Science I
SEMESTER (B=BOTH;PO=PHASE OUT;S=SPRING; F=FALL
213 (PO)Engineering Geology
217 (B)Systemic Analysis of the Earth
227 (S)Structural Analysis of the Earth
308 (F)Data Analysis-ESS Modeling
311 (F)Environmental Field Methods
317 (S) Atmospheric Change
318 (S) Fund. of Atmospheric Science NEW
413 (F) Environmental Geo. Chem.
426 (S) Environmental Remote Sensing
439 (S) Mineral/Energy Resources or similar
446 (F) Ground Water Hydrology
330 (S) Geographic Inf.
345 (S) Hydrology
472 (B) Field Project
488 (S) Climate Change
528 (S) Plate Geotectonics
328 (F) Global Hazards
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X XX X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
Last revised, Spring 2012
Learning Outcome Grid(Outcomes are numbered from 1 to 10 as listed above)
Courses Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
561 (F) Geophysics
565 (F) Environmental Geophysics Field
A2300/EES79903 (S)Subsurface Remediation
A3300 (F)Earth Science Instrumentation
X
X
X X
X
X
X X X
X
X X
X
X
X
X X
X
Division of Science Rubrics for Assessing Program Outcomes EAS Program Outcome 1: Design field research programs Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding Equivalent grade F C B A 1.1: Can only apply scientific
principles to problem solving with guidance; cannot reach solutions or makes many mistakes when solving problems.
Can identify appropriate scientific principles in developing problem solutions; able to solve problem but makes minor mistakes.
Demonstrates thorough knowledge of scientific principles and applies them correctly to solve engineering problems.
Can also determine whether answer is appropriate to problem.
1.2: Can only apply mathematic principles to problem solving with guidance; cannot reach solutions or makes many mistakes when solving problems.
Can identify appropriate mathematical principles to solve problem; able to solve problem but makes minor mistakes.
Can apply mathematical principles correctly to engineering problems and some problems without errors.
Can also determine whether answer is appropriate to problem.
Measurement Selected homework, projects, or exams.
Adaptation to course Instructor should identify scientific and mathematical techniques that are appropriate for their course
Program Outcome 2: Use computers for earth system science applications Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding Equivalent grade F C B A 2.1: Ability to Cannot formulate an
experimental plan that matches the objective; cannot select appropriate tools; unaware of uncertainty
Formulates an incomplete experimental plan; needs guidance in selecting appropriate tools; is aware of sources of uncertainty but does not account for them or does so poorly
Formulates an adequate experimental plan; selects adequate tools; aware of sources of uncertainty and able to account for them
Formulates a comprehensive experimental plan; selects appropriate tools; aware of sources of error and uncertainty and accounts for them in the plan
2.2: Ability to design an experiment
Objective and hypothesis are poorly defined; Does not or is unable to explain how experiment will meet objective; Procedure and data tables have not been prepared in advance or are unclear; Unable to complete experiment; Recorded data is incomplete or incorrect
Objective and hypothesis are poorly defined; Unable to clearly explain relationship between experiment and objective; Procedure and data tables are prepared in advance but are not clear or organized; Able to complete experiment; Recorded data is mostly complete and correct
Can state a basic objective and hypothesis; Able to explain basic relationship between experiment and objective; Procedure and data tables are prepared in advance and are reasonably clear and organized but not concise; Able to complete experiment; Recorded data is complete and correct
Can state the full objective; Able to explain full relationship between experiment and hypothesis; Procedure and data tables are prepared in advance and are clear, organized and concise; Able to complete experiment; Recorded data is complete, correct, and well organized
2.3: Ability to test hypotheses
Mathematically analyzes data incorrectly
Mathematically analyzes data correctly; Makes interpretations of results that are incomplete
Makes interpretations of results that are correct; Also explains whether and why the objective was met and the hypothesis was correct
Also comments on effect of error or uncertainty in interpretation of results; Explains the larger significance of the experiment and its results
2.4: Ability to interpret results
Measurement B1 and 2; Lab reports; B3: Assignment
Adaptation B1 and B3 will only apply to more advanced courses; instructor should define appropriate tools for B1
Program Outcome 3: Perform quantitative calculations Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding Equivalent grade F C B A 3.1: Ability to perform experiments
Tries to develop a solution without defining problem
Has trouble starting, incomplete definition, little understanding of constraints
Develops a scope, some objectives, and some constraints
Develops scope, constraints, and objectives with no preconceptions
Jumps to a solution with no other steps; does not recognize that there may be several "correct" solutions
Alternative solutions are weakly developed
Develops alternative based on examples in class solution
Has several well developed solutions; one or more solutions are innovative
Can not support solution; shows no or little knowledge of codes
Incomplete evaluation; stops with one or two strong points
Evaluates solution against some objectives and/or constraints, but not complete
Does a thorough evaluation against objectives and constraints and can support choice; includes likely societal or environmental impacts
Measurement Project or assignment; may require submission of intermediate steps.
Program Outcome 4: Reason scientifically in context of the earth system Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding Equivalent grade F C B A 4.1: Evaluate experimental solutions
Waited for others to make suggestions or expected to be told what to do
Contributed ideas occasionally
Contributed ideas on most or all occasions
Not only contributed their own ideas but suggested how to improve other team members' ideas
4.2: Data interpretation Tried to dominate discussion or ignored what others were saying
Listened to others. Listened to others and encouraged others to talk; asked team members for information from their area or assignments.
Helped lead useful discussions by making sure that each member contributed and the group stayed on topic; helped to avert arguments
4.3: Ability to evaluate validity of results
Failed on several occasions to have their work done
Had to be repeatedly reminded or missed meetings or interim due dates
Had all work done on time and was on time for all meetings
Had all work done on time and was available to help other team members
Tried to minimize their share of the work; never helped another team member
Did their share of the work
Did more than their share of the work by taking on additional tasks or helping other team members
Did more than their share and kept on eye on the project as a whole
Measurement Peer evaluation by students within teams; in some courses, observation of students.
Program Outcome 5: Discuss issues and controversies in earth system science Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding Equivalent grade F C B A 5.1: Unable to identify most
important features of problem to account for; Unable to break problem into solvable components; Unable to identify uncertainty or state assumptions
Able to identify some important features of problem to account for; Breaks problem into components that are not necessarily solvable; Able to identify some uncertainties and assumptions
Able to identify most features of problem to account for; Breaks problem into solvable components; Able to identify most important uncertainties and assumptions
Able to identify all features of problem to account for; Breaks problem into solvable components; Able to identify all important uncertainties and assumptions
Unable to solve problems similar to those done in class; Unable to solve other problems without guidance
Able to solve problems similar to those done in class; Able to solve other problems with guidance
Able to solve problems that are variations of those done in class without guidance
Able to solve problems that are different from those done in class without guidance
Unable to identify whether results are reasonable, Unable to explain significance of results, Unable to identify how results would differ if different approach was used to solve problem
Able to identify whether results are reasonable, Able to explain significance of results, Able to identify how results would differ if different approach was used to solve problem
Also uses unit analysis to check results
Also uses independent methods to check results; Also able to use results to make recommendations
Measurement Project or targeted homework
Adaptation Type of problem should be pertinent to course.
Program Outcome 6: Identify and work with earth materials and earth structures Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding Equivalent grade F C B A 6.1: Ability to work as part of a team
Can not organize ideas; important information left out; jumps from topic to topic with no order
Main ideas are clear; Proper information provided in each section. Data in tables and figures explained in text.
Paper is well structured; text explains theoretical and conceptual justifications for work.
Paper is also concise, and convincing
6.2: Can write in grammatically correct fashion
Written work is full of grammatical and spelling errors; no references when references are needed
Written work has few grammatical or spelling errors
Written work is grammatically correct and has no spelling errors
Written work is exceptionally clear and easy to read.
6.3: Can format and present written work appropriately
Written work does not follow required format; Drawings, figures, and tables not prepared with proper software.
Report follows required format with abstract, introduction, procedure, results, analysis of results, and conclusion. Tables, figures, and equations are provided.
Report gives technical references other than textbook. Equations, tables, and figures are properly labeled and well presented.
Paragraph titles, equations, figures, tables and footnotes are well formatted and presented. Report looks professional.
6.4: Can provide correct technical content
Concepts are misunderstood. Calculations are incorrect. Results are inconsistent.
Calculations are correct. Report provides an interpretation of results.
Analysis of results is solid. Explanations for observed results are provided and supported
Student shows thorough understanding of concepts and is able to relate data and results to material covered in class
Measurement Written homework and reports
Program Outcome 7: Function well in team-coordinated activities 7.2: Ability to present quantitative information in oral form
Poor choice of presentation method for information to be presented; tables and figures difficult to interpret; information in table not relevant to text
Tables and figures not labeled or units not given; not discussed in text
Tables and figures correctly and completely labeled and readable; discussed in text
Tables and figures correct, readable, and convincing; graphical presentation is appealing.
Measurement Reports
Program Outcome 8: Identify, formulate and solve real world earth science problems Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding
Equivalent grade F C B A
8.2: Can write in grammatically correct fashion
Poor choice of material to present; relevance not clear; no introduction or conclusion; poor or no slides
Presents important material; slides present relevant information
Well organized talk leading to important conclusion; slides present relevant material in concise and convincing manner
Well organized talk leading to important conclusion; slides present relevant material in concise and convincing manner; can handle questions and interruptions well
8.3: Can format and present written work appropriately
Does not speak loud enough, faces screen, rather than audience, slouches or has annoying mannerism
Speaks loud enough, stands erect
Uses voice effectively and addresses audience clearly
Projects an image of competence and professionally
8.4: Can provide correct technical content
Measurement Oral presentations
Program Outcome 9: Communicate effectively at all levels, orally and in writing Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding Equivalent grade F C B A 9.1: Ability to use online databases and instruments
Unaware of general or specific impacts of an engineering action relevant to course
Identifies general impacts relevent to course and explains why they occur
Also identifies specific impacts relevent to course and explains why they occur
Also uses impacts to recommend alternate solutions to a course problem
Measurement Design or research projects, exams, homework assignments
Adaptation to course Instructor should choose environmental, economic, and/or societal impacts as appropriate to course.
Program Outcome 10: Use earth science instruments Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding Equivalent grade F C B A 10.1: Ability to explain modern biological concepts to a non-biologist
Is ignorant of or shows no interest in professional and technical organizations
Occasionally participates in professional and technical organizations
Also joins professional and technical organizations
Also takes on leadership roles in professional and technical organizations
I2: Relies on class notes, textbook and instructor for most information
Inconsistently draws upon outside sources of information; unable to or does not judge whether sources are credible
Inconsistently draws upon outside sources of information that are credible
Consistently draws upon credible outside sources of information
Measurement I1: Membership in student or professional organizations; I2: Projects, homework assignments
http://gradsurvey.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/
CCNY SCIENCE DIVISION ADVISING OFFICEPost-Graduation Exit Survey
*Your name:
*Your e-mail(1):
*Graduation Date:
1. What’s your next step after graduating. (Check all that apply)
Stayinschool
Lookforajob
Employed
Don’tknow/Prefernottoanswer
2. Staying in touch.
Yes,Iwouldliketostayintouchwiththecollege.IauthorizeaCCNY
representativetocontactmewithinthenext12months.
If you prefer someone to contact you please indicate person’s name and department below:
Contact’s Name:
Department:
* Required Answers
(1)Anemailmessagewithaconfirmationlinkwillbesenttotheaddressyouspecify.Clicking
onthelinkwillberequiredtocompletethissurvey.
For best experience, please use with Chrome, Firefox 10, Safari 5, or IE v 9 or 10.
Month: Year:
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
MASTERS STUDENT SURVEY
How can the Division of Science better serve you?
Your E-Mail Address (Optional)
Question 1
In which discipline will you be earning your masters degree?
Biology
Math
EAS
Physics
Biochemistry
Chemistry
Science education
Other
Question 2
What is your specific area of study?
Question 3a
What stimulated your desire to earn a masters degree?
I needed the degree for my job
I needed the degree for a job for which I plan to apply
I am using the masters as a bridge to PhD study
This degree is purely for self improvement
other
Question 3b
Explain your answer to 3a here (if you have chosen ‘other’ or if you have more to tell us.)
characters remaining
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
Question 4
Who is your primary advisor/mentor?
Question 5
What kind of masters are you pursuing?
research and thesis
exam
certificate
education (30 over)
education specialization
other
Question 6
When is your expected graduation?
prior to spring 2012
Spring 12
Summer 12
Fall 12
Spring 13
Summer 13
Fall 13
Beyond 2013
Question 7
Are you planning to pursue a Ph.D.?
yes
No
Undecided
Question 8
If yes to question 7, identify your research area of interest (currently).
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
Question 9
If yes to question 7, to which Universities HAVE YOU ALREADY APPLIED? Provide name and
indicate whether you have been accepted.
Question 9a
If you have not yet applied to PhD programs, please indicate programs to which you are
planning to apply.
Question 10
What specific profession are you pursuing?
Question 11
What do like best about your masters study at CCNY? (list as many items as can fit in 300
characters!)
Question 12
How satisfied are you with the ease of meeting with an advisor?
dissatisfied
somewhat satisfied
satisfied
very satisfied
beyond expectation
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
Question 13
How satisfied are you with the academic advising you receive?
dissatisfied
somewhat satisfied
satisfied
very satisfied
beyond expectations
Question 14
How satisfied are you with advice and guidance concerning non-academic matters? (e.g.
career counseling, job placement, or other matters)
dissatisfied
somewhat satisfied
satisfied
very satisfied
beyond expectation
does not apply
Question 15
How satisfied are you with the registration process?
dissatisfied
somewhat satisfied
satisfied
very satisfied
beyond expectations
Question 16
What do you like least about your masters study at CCNY? (again, list all that can fit in 300
characters)
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
Question 17
Which if any core facilities do you use? How satisfied are you with the core facilities?
Question 18
What if anything would you change regarding your masters experience at CCNY? (300 characters)
Question 19
What is your gender? (Optional)
male
female
Question 20
What is your ethnicity? (Optional)
African American
Asian
Caucasian
Latina
other
do not want to answer
Question 21
Do you currently work full time? (Optional)
Yes
No, only part time
No, not at all
How can we serve you better?
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/administration/deans-office/
STUDENT INFORMATION
This database will enable us to keep in touch with all of our Science majors-graduates
Dear Advisors,
Thank you for submitting this information to this student contact database. Please
update the contact information as needed.
Last Name
First Name
Street Address
City, State, Zip
Cell Phone
Best email
major
choose one
Entry Semester
Date (semester) of declaration of major
Expected Semester of Graduation
Last revised, Spring 2012
Mission Statement
The mission of the Department of Mathematics is to serve the present and future needs of
the student body, the faculty, and the public by contributing via teaching to the mathematical
education of our students, and via research and scholarship to the body of knowledge in the
discipline of mathematics.
The Department provides the mathematics education required of all students at the City College.
This ranges from developing the quantitative literacy of the liberal arts graduate, to the more
specialized training needed by future practitioners in such areas as teaching, architecture, science
and engineering, and medicine.
The Department’s introductory, service, elective, and Master’s courses prepare the College’s
students for advanced work in science, engineering, and mathematics. This preparation is
crucial in providing New York City with a mathematically trained workforce in the twenty-
first century. Our role in this area is a direct contribution to the University’s mission of
service to the public. The research carried out by members of the Department contributes
to the growing body of knowledge in the discipline of mathematics. Its quality and scope
are congruent with the University’s commitment to excellence in research and scholarship.
Moreover, it enhances the excellence of teaching, thereby contributing to the academic quality
of the programs offered to our students.
Learning Outcomes
Students completing introductory and service courses in the mathematics department will develop the abilities to:
1. Understand the fundamentals ideas and applications of calculus and linear algebra.
2. Employ technology to investigate mathematical concepts and applications.
3. Succeed in subsequent courses (for which these courses are prerequisites) within the
City CollegeDepartment of MATHEMATICS
Last revised, Spring 2012
mathematics department or in other undergraduate departments, (especially in the Grove
School of Engineering).
Students in our elective courses (including mathematics majors) will develop the ability to:
• Understand the theory of mathematical analysis as well as the theory of other major
branches of mathematics such as algebra, discrete mathematics, probability and statistics,
and financial mathematics.
• Understand the nature of a mathematical proof and the ideas of counter-examples,
specialization and generalization.
• Communicate mathematical concepts both in writing and orally.
Additional specific objectives for mathematics majors include:
• (for secondary education majors) The ability to pass the CST and to become effective high
school teachers.
• (for applied mathematics majors) Obtaining a knowledge of advanced concepts in either
statistics or financial mathematics.
• (for pure math majors) Obtaining an understanding of the role of advanced mathematics
in different disciplines and preparation for graduate studies in mathematics and related
disciplines, or for careers demanding a high level of analytic skills.
Outcome Grid
1. Perform numeric and symbolic computations.
2. Construct and apply symbolic and graphical representations of functions.
3. Model real-life problems mathematically.
4. Use technology appropriately to analyzxe mathematical problems.
5. State and apply mathematical definitions and theorems.
6. Prove fundamental theorems.
7. Construct and present a rigorous mathematical argument.
32300 - Advanced Calculus I; PM; ME
32404 - Advanced Calculus II; PM
32800 - Methods of Numerical Analysis; PM
34200 - History of Mathematics; PM
34500 - Theory of Numbers; PM
34600 - Linear Algebra PM; AM; ME
34700 - Modern Algebra PM; ME
36000 - Intro to Modern Geometry ME
36500 - Elements of Combinatorics AM; ME
36600 - Introduction to Applied Mathematical Computation AM; ME
37700 - Applied Statistics and Probability AM
37500 - Probability AM; ME
37600 - Statistics AM
Last revised, Spring 2012
Learning Outcome Grid(Outcomes are numbered from 1 to 7 as listed above)
Courses Learning Outcomes
1
X X X
X X
X XX
X X XXX
X X XX
X X XX
X X XX
X X XX
X X XXX
X XX
X X XX
X X X X
X X X X
X
X X X X X
B
B B B BB
B B B B B
X X X XX
X XX X
X X X X XX
X X
X X X X
X X
X X XX X X
B B B B BB
B B B
2 3 4 5 6 7
15000 - Math for Contemporary World
17300 - Elementary Statistics
18000- Quantitative Reasoning
18500 - Basic Ideas 1
19000 - College Algebra & Trigonometry
19500 - Pre-calculus
20100- Calculus 1 PM; AM; ME
20200 - Calculus II PM; AM; ME
20300 - Calculus III PM; AM; ME
20500 - Elements of Calculus I
20900 - Elements of Calculus & Statistics
30800 - Bridge to Higher Mathematics PM; ME
Last revised, Spring 2012
Learning Outcome Grid
Courses Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
38200 - Financial Math II AM
39100 - Differential Equations AM
39200 - Linear Algebra
39300 - Intro to Applied Fourier Analysis; PM;
39500 - Complex Variables for Scientists and Engineers;
43200 - Theory of Functions of a complex variable
43400 - Theory of Functions of Real Variables
X X X X
X
X
X
X XX
X XX
X B
X B
X B B B B B
B B
B
B B
B
X
X B B B
B B B
B B
B B B
B B B
B B B
B
B
B B
B B B B
B B B B B
B B B B B
B B B B B
B B B B B
B B B B B
B B B B BB
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
51200 - Selected topics in Classical Analysis
43500 - Partial Differential Equations I
44300 - Set Theory
44400 - Mathematical Logic
44900 - Intro to Modern Algebra
46100 - Differential Geometry
46300 - Topology
46700 - Mathematical Modeling
47700 - Stochastic Processes I
47800 - Advanced Mathematical Statistics
51100 - Selected topics in Pure Mathematics
51300 - Selected topics in porbability, statistics and Operations research
Division of Science Rubrics for Assessing Program Outcomes MATH Program Outcome 1: Perform numeric and symbolic computations Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding Equivalent grade F C B A 1.1: Can only apply scientific
principles to problem solving with guidance; cannot reach solutions or makes many mistakes when solving problems.
Can identify appropriate scientific principles in developing problem solutions; able to solve problem but makes minor mistakes.
Demonstrates thorough knowledge of scientific principles and applies them correctly to solve engineering problems.
Can also determine whether answer is appropriate to problem.
1.2: Can only apply mathematic principles to problem solving with guidance; cannot reach solutions or makes many mistakes when solving problems.
Can identify appropriate mathematical principles to solve problem; able to solve problem but makes minor mistakes.
Can apply mathematical principles correctly to engineering problems and some problems without errors.
Can also determine whether answer is appropriate to problem.
Measurement Selected homework, projects, or exams.
Adaptation to course Instructor should identify scientific and mathematical techniques that are appropriate for their course
Program Outcome 2: Construct and apply symbolic and graphical representations of functions Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding Equivalent grade F C B A 2.1: Ability to Cannot formulate an
experimental plan that matches the objective; cannot select appropriate tools; unaware of uncertainty
Formulates an incomplete experimental plan; needs guidance in selecting appropriate tools; is aware of sources of uncertainty but does not account for them or does so poorly
Formulates an adequate experimental plan; selects adequate tools; aware of sources of uncertainty and able to account for them
Formulates a comprehensive experimental plan; selects appropriate tools; aware of sources of error and uncertainty and accounts for them in the plan
2.2: Ability to design an experiment
Objective and hypothesis are poorly defined; Does not or is unable to explain how experiment will meet objective; Procedure and data tables have not been prepared in advance or are unclear; Unable to complete experiment; Recorded data is incomplete or incorrect
Objective and hypothesis are poorly defined; Unable to clearly explain relationship between experiment and objective; Procedure and data tables are prepared in advance but are not clear or organized; Able to complete experiment; Recorded data is mostly complete and correct
Can state a basic objective and hypothesis; Able to explain basic relationship between experiment and objective; Procedure and data tables are prepared in advance and are reasonably clear and organized but not concise; Able to complete experiment; Recorded data is complete and correct
Can state the full objective; Able to explain full relationship between experiment and hypothesis; Procedure and data tables are prepared in advance and are clear, organized and concise; Able to complete experiment; Recorded data is complete, correct, and well organized
2.3: Ability to test hypotheses
Mathematically analyzes data incorrectly
Mathematically analyzes data correctly; Makes interpretations of results that are incomplete
Makes interpretations of results that are correct; Also explains whether and why the objective was met and the hypothesis was correct
Also comments on effect of error or uncertainty in interpretation of results; Explains the larger significance of the experiment and its results
2.4: Ability to interpret results
Measurement B1 and 2; Lab reports; B3: Assignment
Adaptation B1 and B3 will only apply to more advanced courses; instructor should define appropriate tools for B1
Program Outcome 3: Model real-life problems mathematically Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding Equivalent grade F C B A 3.1: Ability to perform experiments
Tries to develop a solution without defining problem
Has trouble starting, incomplete definition, little understanding of constraints
Develops a scope, some objectives, and some constraints
Develops scope, constraints, and objectives with no preconceptions
Jumps to a solution with no other steps; does not recognize that there may be several "correct" solutions
Alternative solutions are weakly developed
Develops alternative based on examples in class solution
Has several well developed solutions; one or more solutions are innovative
Can not support solution; shows no or little knowledge of codes
Incomplete evaluation; stops with one or two strong points
Evaluates solution against some objectives and/or constraints, but not complete
Does a thorough evaluation against objectives and constraints and can support choice; includes likely societal or environmental impacts
Measurement Project or assignment; may require submission of intermediate steps.
Program Outcome 4: Use technology appropriately to analyze mathematical problems Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding Equivalent grade F C B A 4.1: Evaluate experimental solutions
Waited for others to make suggestions or expected to be told what to do
Contributed ideas occasionally
Contributed ideas on most or all occasions
Not only contributed their own ideas but suggested how to improve other team members' ideas
4.2: Data interpretation Tried to dominate discussion or ignored what others were saying
Listened to others. Listened to others and encouraged others to talk; asked team members for information from their area or assignments.
Helped lead useful discussions by making sure that each member contributed and the group stayed on topic; helped to avert arguments
4.3: Ability to evaluate validity of results
Failed on several occasions to have their work done
Had to be repeatedly reminded or missed meetings or interim due dates
Had all work done on time and was on time for all meetings
Had all work done on time and was available to help other team members
Tried to minimize their share of the work; never helped another team member
Did their share of the work
Did more than their share of the work by taking on additional tasks or helping other team members
Did more than their share and kept on eye on the project as a whole
Measurement Peer evaluation by students within teams; in some courses, observation of students.
Program Outcome 5: State and apply mathematical definitions and theorems Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding Equivalent grade F C B A 5.1: Unable to identify most
important features of problem to account for; Unable to break problem into solvable components; Unable to identify uncertainty or state assumptions
Able to identify some important features of problem to account for; Breaks problem into components that are not necessarily solvable; Able to identify some uncertainties and assumptions
Able to identify most features of problem to account for; Breaks problem into solvable components; Able to identify most important uncertainties and assumptions
Able to identify all features of problem to account for; Breaks problem into solvable components; Able to identify all important uncertainties and assumptions
Unable to solve problems similar to those done in class; Unable to solve other problems without guidance
Able to solve problems similar to those done in class; Able to solve other problems with guidance
Able to solve problems that are variations of those done in class without guidance
Able to solve problems that are different from those done in class without guidance
Unable to identify whether results are reasonable, Unable to explain significance of results, Unable to identify how results would differ if different approach was used to solve problem
Able to identify whether results are reasonable, Able to explain significance of results, Able to identify how results would differ if different approach was used to solve problem
Also uses unit analysis to check results
Also uses independent methods to check results; Also able to use results to make recommendations
Measurement Project or targeted homework
Adaptation Type of problem should be pertinent to course.
Program Outcome 6: Prove fundamental theorems Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding Equivalent grade F C B A 6.1: Ability to work as part of a team
Can not organize ideas; important information left out; jumps from topic to topic with no order
Main ideas are clear; Proper information provided in each section. Data in tables and figures explained in text.
Paper is well structured; text explains theoretical and conceptual justifications for work.
Paper is also concise, and convincing
6.2: Can write in grammatically correct fashion
Written work is full of grammatical and spelling errors; no references when references are needed
Written work has few grammatical or spelling errors
Written work is grammatically correct and has no spelling errors
Written work is exceptionally clear and easy to read.
6.3: Can format and present written work appropriately
Written work does not follow required format; Drawings, figures, and tables not prepared with proper software.
Report follows required format with abstract, introduction, procedure, results, analysis of results, and conclusion. Tables, figures, and equations are provided.
Report gives technical references other than textbook. Equations, tables, and figures are properly labeled and well presented.
Paragraph titles, equations, figures, tables and footnotes are well formatted and presented. Report looks professional.
6.4: Can provide correct technical content
Concepts are misunderstood. Calculations are incorrect. Results are inconsistent.
Calculations are correct. Report provides an interpretation of results.
Analysis of results is solid. Explanations for observed results are provided and supported
Student shows thorough understanding of concepts and is able to relate data and results to material covered in class
Measurement Written homework and reports
Program Outcome 7: Construct and present a rigorous mathematical argument 7.2: Ability to present quantitative information in oral form
Poor choice of presentation method for information to be presented; tables and figures difficult to interpret; information in table not relevant to text
Tables and figures not labeled or units not given; not discussed in text
Tables and figures correctly and completely labeled and readable; discussed in text
Tables and figures correct, readable, and convincing; graphical presentation is appealing.
Measurement Reports
http://gradsurvey.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/
CCNY SCIENCE DIVISION ADVISING OFFICEPost-Graduation Exit Survey
*Your name:
*Your e-mail(1):
*Graduation Date:
1. What’s your next step after graduating. (Check all that apply)
Stayinschool
Lookforajob
Employed
Don’tknow/Prefernottoanswer
2. Staying in touch.
Yes,Iwouldliketostayintouchwiththecollege.IauthorizeaCCNY
representativetocontactmewithinthenext12months.
If you prefer someone to contact you please indicate person’s name and department below:
Contact’s Name:
Department:
* Required Answers
(1)Anemailmessagewithaconfirmationlinkwillbesenttotheaddressyouspecify.Clicking
onthelinkwillberequiredtocompletethissurvey.
For best experience, please use with Chrome, Firefox 10, Safari 5, or IE v 9 or 10.
Month: Year:
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
MASTERS STUDENT SURVEY
How can the Division of Science better serve you?
Your E-Mail Address (Optional)
Question 1
In which discipline will you be earning your masters degree?
Biology
Math
EAS
Physics
Biochemistry
Chemistry
Science education
Other
Question 2
What is your specific area of study?
Question 3a
What stimulated your desire to earn a masters degree?
I needed the degree for my job
I needed the degree for a job for which I plan to apply
I am using the masters as a bridge to PhD study
This degree is purely for self improvement
other
Question 3b
Explain your answer to 3a here (if you have chosen ‘other’ or if you have more to tell us.)
characters remaining
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
Question 4
Who is your primary advisor/mentor?
Question 5
What kind of masters are you pursuing?
research and thesis
exam
certificate
education (30 over)
education specialization
other
Question 6
When is your expected graduation?
prior to spring 2012
Spring 12
Summer 12
Fall 12
Spring 13
Summer 13
Fall 13
Beyond 2013
Question 7
Are you planning to pursue a Ph.D.?
yes
No
Undecided
Question 8
If yes to question 7, identify your research area of interest (currently).
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
Question 9
If yes to question 7, to which Universities HAVE YOU ALREADY APPLIED? Provide name and
indicate whether you have been accepted.
Question 9a
If you have not yet applied to PhD programs, please indicate programs to which you are
planning to apply.
Question 10
What specific profession are you pursuing?
Question 11
What do like best about your masters study at CCNY? (list as many items as can fit in 300
characters!)
Question 12
How satisfied are you with the ease of meeting with an advisor?
dissatisfied
somewhat satisfied
satisfied
very satisfied
beyond expectation
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
Question 13
How satisfied are you with the academic advising you receive?
dissatisfied
somewhat satisfied
satisfied
very satisfied
beyond expectations
Question 14
How satisfied are you with advice and guidance concerning non-academic matters? (e.g.
career counseling, job placement, or other matters)
dissatisfied
somewhat satisfied
satisfied
very satisfied
beyond expectation
does not apply
Question 15
How satisfied are you with the registration process?
dissatisfied
somewhat satisfied
satisfied
very satisfied
beyond expectations
Question 16
What do you like least about your masters study at CCNY? (again, list all that can fit in 300
characters)
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
Question 17
Which if any core facilities do you use? How satisfied are you with the core facilities?
Question 18
What if anything would you change regarding your masters experience at CCNY? (300 characters)
Question 19
What is your gender? (Optional)
male
female
Question 20
What is your ethnicity? (Optional)
African American
Asian
Caucasian
Latina
other
do not want to answer
Question 21
Do you currently work full time? (Optional)
Yes
No, only part time
No, not at all
How can we serve you better?
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/administration/deans-office/
STUDENT INFORMATION
This database will enable us to keep in touch with all of our Science majors-graduates
Dear Advisors,
Thank you for submitting this information to this student contact database. Please
update the contact information as needed.
Last Name
First Name
Street Address
City, State, Zip
Cell Phone
Best email
major
choose one
Entry Semester
Date (semester) of declaration of major
Expected Semester of Graduation
Last revised, Spring 2012
Mission Statement
The mission of the Department of Physics of the City College of New York is to combine
research, teaching, and service in order to inspire, educate and prepare our students to be
leaders in their chosen field of physics. In addition, our mission is to inculcate in students the
culture of a rational approach and analysis to any problem or situation; to provide high-quality
and comprehensive undergraduate and graduate educational programs that help students
acquire an appreciation of the physical world as understandable and explainable in a logical
way in terms of the laws of physics; to advance the frontiers of knowledge in physics through
the creative research of faculty and students; to provide educational and scientific resources to
the larger community.
Learning Outcomes
Students with a B.A. in Physics will
1. The Department of Physics will endeavor to acquire knowledge of the basic laws of physics
and their applications; Develop the ability to use mathematics and computers as tools to
analyze physical problems.
• train students to design and conduct experiments and to analyze and interpret data.
• help students to develop the skills to communicate their results in a professional manner,
both in oral and written forms.
2. The Department of Physics will endeavor to
• conduct research in physics with a high standard of excellence that will lead to recognition at
the national and international levels.
• promote interdisciplinary and collaborative research efforts both within and outside the College.
3. The Department of Physics will endeavor to
• prepare our students for entry into nationally-ranked graduate programs or professional
schools, for careers in teaching or for employment in high-technology industry in both physics
and physics-related areas.
• serve the larger community through teaching, research and outreach Programs.
City CollegeDepartment of PHYSICS
Last revised, Spring 2012
Learning Outcome Grid(Outcomes are numbered from 1 to 8 as listed below)
1. Learn laws of physics and solve problems
2. Design and carry out experiments; analyze and interpret results
3. Communicate by written and oral means
4. Work cooperatively with others
5. Participate in research
6. Use computers and appropriate technology
7. Learn laws of physics and solve problems at an introductory level
8. Use physics to perform well in advanced courses in their own majors
Required for Architects; Required for
Engineering; Required for Biology;
Required for Honors Students
Note: 1 ~ 6 apply to physics majors
and 7~ 8 apply to students in other
majors taking courses in physics.
Courses Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
203 General Physics I (non-calculus)
204 General Physics II (non-calculus)
207 General Physics I (calculus)
208 General Physics II (calculus)
219 Physics for Architects
305 Astronomy
321 Modern Physics for Engineers (Eng.majors)
354 Electricity & Magnetism II
371 Advanced Lab I
422 Biophysics
451 Thermodynamics and Statistical Physics
452 Optics
351 Mechanics
353 Electricity & Magnetism I
453 Physical Photonics I (Laser Optics)
471 Advanced Lab II
551 Quantum Mechanics I
552 Quantum Mechanics II
556 Current Topics in Physics
310 Independent Study
310 301, 302, 303 Physics (Honors)
323 Quantum Mechanics for EE majors
X X X
X X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X X X X
X
X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X
X
Division of Science Rubrics for Assessing Program Outcomes PHYSICS G. Learn laws of physics and solve problems at an introductory level H. Use physics to perform well in advanced courses in their own majors Program Outcome 1: Learn laws of physics and solve problems Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding Equivalent grade F C B A 1.1: Can only apply scientific
principles to problem solving with guidance; cannot reach solutions or makes many mistakes when solving problems.
Can identify appropriate scientific principles in developing problem solutions; able to solve problem but makes minor mistakes.
Demonstrates thorough knowledge of scientific principles and applies them correctly to solve engineering problems.
Can also determine whether answer is appropriate to problem.
1.2: Can only apply mathematic principles to problem solving with guidance; cannot reach solutions or makes many mistakes when solving problems.
Can identify appropriate mathematical principles to solve problem; able to solve problem but makes minor mistakes.
Can apply mathematical principles correctly to engineering problems and some problems without errors.
Can also determine whether answer is appropriate to problem.
Measurement Selected homework, projects, or exams.
Adaptation to course Instructor should identify scientific and mathematical techniques that are appropriate for their course
Program Outcome 2: Design and carry out experiments; analyze and interpret results Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding Equivalent grade F C B A 2.1: Ability to formulate questions
Cannot formulate an experimental plan that matches the objective; cannot select appropriate tools; unaware of uncertainty
Formulates an incomplete experimental plan; needs guidance in selecting appropriate tools; is aware of sources of uncertainty but does not account for them or does so poorly
Formulates an adequate experimental plan; selects adequate tools; aware of sources of uncertainty and able to account for them
Formulates a comprehensive experimental plan; selects appropriate tools; aware of sources of error and uncertainty and accounts for them in the plan
2.2: Ability to design an experiment
Objective and hypothesis are poorly defined; Does not or is unable to explain how experiment will meet objective; Procedure and data tables have not been prepared in advance or are unclear; Unable to complete experiment; Recorded data is incomplete or incorrect
Objective and hypothesis are poorly defined; Unable to clearly explain relationship between experiment and objective; Procedure and data tables are prepared in advance but are not clear or organized; Able to complete experiment; Recorded data is mostly complete and correct
Can state a basic objective and hypothesis; Able to explain basic relationship between experiment and objective; Procedure and data tables are prepared in advance and are reasonably clear and organized but not concise; Able to complete experiment; Recorded data is complete and correct
Can state the full objective; Able to explain full relationship between experiment and hypothesis; Procedure and data tables are prepared in advance and are clear, organized and concise; Able to complete experiment; Recorded data is complete, correct, and well organized
2.3: Ability to test hypotheses
Mathematically analyzes data incorrectly
Mathematically analyzes data correctly; Makes interpretations of results that are incomplete
Makes interpretations of results that are correct; Also explains whether and why the objective was met and the hypothesis was correct
Also comments on effect of error or uncertainty in interpretation of results; Explains the larger significance of the experiment and its results
2.4: Ability to interpret results
Measurement B1 and 2; Lab reports; B3: Assignment
Adaptation B1 and B3 will only apply to more advanced courses; instructor should define appropriate tools for B1
Program Outcome 3: Communicate by written and oral means Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding Equivalent grade F C B A 3.1: Ability to perform experiments using equipment used in research
Tries to develop a solution without defining problem
Has trouble starting, incomplete definition, little understanding of constraints
Develops a scope, some objectives, and some constraints
Develops scope, constraints, and objectives with no preconceptions
3.2: Evaluate solution Jumps to a solution with no other steps; does not recognize that there may be several "correct" solutions
Alternative solutions are weakly developed
Develops alternative based on examples in class solution
Has several well developed solutions; one or more solutions are innovative
Can not support solution; shows no or little knowledge of codes
Incomplete evaluation; stops with one or two strong points
Evaluates solution against some objectives and/or constraints, but not complete
Does a thorough evaluation against objectives and constraints and can support choice; includes likely societal or environmental impacts
Measurement Project or assignment; may require submission of intermediate steps.
Program Outcome 4: Work cooperatively with others Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding Equivalent grade F C B A 4.1: Plot data in graphs or maps
Waited for others to make suggestions or expected to be told what to do
Contributed ideas occasionally
Contributed ideas on most or all occasions
Not only contributed their own ideas but suggested how to improve other team members' ideas
Tried to dominate discussion or ignored what others were saying
Listened to others. Listened to others and encouraged others to talk; asked team members for information from their area or assignments.
Helped lead useful discussions by making sure that each member contributed and the group stayed on topic; helped to avert arguments
Failed on several occasions to have their work done
Had to be repeatedly reminded or missed meetings or interim due dates
Had all work done on time and was on time for all meetings
Had all work done on time and was available to help other team members
Tried to minimize their share of the work; never helped another team member
Did their share of the work
Did more than their share of the work by taking on additional tasks or helping other team members
Did more than their share and kept on eye on the project as a whole
Measurement Peer evaluation by students within teams; in some courses, observation of students.
Program Outcome 5: Participate in research Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding Equivalent grade F C B A 5.1: Ability to evaluate problems using statistical significane
Unable to identify most important features of problem to account for; Unable to break problem into solvable components; Unable to identify uncertainty or state assumptions
Able to identify some important features of problem to account for; Breaks problem into components that are not necessarily solvable; Able to identify some uncertainties and assumptions
Able to identify most features of problem to account for; Breaks problem into solvable components; Able to identify most important uncertainties and assumptions
Able to identify all features of problem to account for; Breaks problem into solvable components; Able to identify all important uncertainties and assumptions
Unable to solve problems similar to those done in class; Unable to solve other problems without guidance
Able to solve problems similar to those done in class; Able to solve other problems with guidance
Able to solve problems that are variations of those done in class without guidance
Able to solve problems that are different from those done in class without guidance
E2: Ability to evaluate validity of results
Unable to identify whether results are reasonable, Unable to explain significance of results, Unable to identify how results would differ if different approach was used to solve problem
Able to identify whether results are reasonable, Able to explain significance of results, Able to identify how results would differ if different approach was used to solve problem
Also uses unit analysis to check results
Also uses independent methods to check results; Also able to use results to make recommendations
Measurement Project or targeted homework
Adaptation Type of problem should be pertinent to course.
Program Outcome 6: Use computers and appropriate technology
Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding Equivalent grade F C B A 6.1: Can structure a paper, report, or memo to communicate their ideas
Can not organize ideas; important information left out; jumps from topic to topic with no order
Main ideas are clear; Proper information provided in each section. Data in tables and figures explained in text.
Paper is well structured; text explains theoretical and conceptual justifications for work.
Paper is also concise, and convincing
6.2: Can write in grammatically correct fashion
Written work is full of grammatical and spelling errors; no references when references are needed
Written work has few grammatical or spelling errors
Written work is grammatically correct and has no spelling errors
Written work is exceptionally clear and easy to read.
6.3: Can format and present written work appropriately
Written work does not follow required format; Drawings, figures, and tables not prepared with proper software.
Report follows required format with abstract, introduction, procedure, results, analysis of results, and conclusion. Tables, figures, and equations are provided.
Report gives technical references other than textbook. Equations, tables, and figures are properly labeled and well presented.
Paragraph titles, equations, figures, tables and footnotes are well formatted and presented. Report looks professional.
6.4: Can provide correct technical content
Concepts are misunderstood. Calculations are incorrect. Results are inconsistent.
Calculations are correct. Report provides an interpretation of results.
Analysis of results is solid. Explanations for observed results are provided and supported
Student shows thorough understanding of concepts and is able to relate data and results to material covered in class
Measurement Written homework and reports
Program Outcome 7 (FOR NON-PHYS MAJORS): Learn laws of physics and solve problems at an introductory level 7.2: Ability to present quantitative information
Poor choice of presentation method for information to be presented; tables and figures difficult to interpret; information in table not relevant to text
Tables and figures not labeled or units not given; not discussed in text
Tables and figures correctly and completely labeled and readable; discussed in text
Tables and figures correct, readable, and convincing; graphical presentation is appealing.
Measurement Reports
Program Outcome 8(FOR NON-PHYS MAJORS): Use physics to perform well in advanced courses in their own majors Criteria Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Outstanding
Equivalent grade F C B A
8.1: Ability to search primary literature
Poor choice of material to present; relevance not clear; no introduction or conclusion; poor or no slides
Presents important material; slides present relevant information
Well organized talk leading to important conclusion; slides present relevant material in concise and convincing manner
Well organized talk leading to important conclusion; slides present relevant material in concise and convincing manner; can handle questions and interruptions well
8.2: Ability to understand primary literature
Does not speak loud enough, faces screen, rather than audience, slouches or has annoying mannerism
Speaks loud enough, stands erect
Uses voice effectively and addresses audience clearly
Projects an image of competence and professionally
Measurement Oral presentations
Last revised, Spring 2012
Mission Statement
The mission of the Department of Physics of the City College of New York is to combine
research, teaching, and service in order to inspire, educate and prepare our students to be
leaders in their chosen field of physics. In addition, our mission is to inculcate in students the
culture of a rational approach and analysis to any problem or situation; to provide high-quality
and comprehensive undergraduate and graduate educational programs that help students
acquire an appreciation of the physical world as understandable and explainable in a logical
way in terms of the laws of physics; to advance the frontiers of knowledge in physics through
the creative research of faculty and students; to provide educational and scientific resources to
the larger community.
Learning Outcomes
Based on our mission, the following goals have been established:
1. The Department of Physics will endeavor to
• enable students to acquire knowledge of the basic laws of physics and their applications;
• help students develop the ability to use mathematics and computers as tools to analyze
physical problems;
• train students to design and conduct experiments and to analyze and interpret data;
• help students to develop the skills to communicate their results in a professional manner,
both in oral and written forms.
2. The Department of Physics will endeavor to
• conduct research in physics with a high standard of excellence that will lead to
recognition at the national and international levels
• promote interdisciplinary and collaborative research efforts both within and outside
the College.
PHYSICSM.A.
Last revised, Spring 2012
3. The Department of Physics will endeavor to
• prepare our students for entry into nationally-ranked graduate programs or professional
schools, for careers in teaching or for employment in high-technology industry in both
physics and physics-related areas;
• serve the larger community through teaching, research and outreach Programs.
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/administration/deans-office/
STUDENT INFORMATION
This database will enable us to keep in touch with all of our Science majors-graduates
Dear Advisors,
Thank you for submitting this information to this student contact database. Please
update the contact information as needed.
Last Name
First Name
Street Address
City, State, Zip
Cell Phone
Best email
major
choose one
Entry Semester
Date (semester) of declaration of major
Expected Semester of Graduation
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
MASTERS STUDENT SURVEY
How can the Division of Science better serve you?
Your E-Mail Address (Optional)
Question 1
In which discipline will you be earning your masters degree?
Biology
Math
EAS
Physics
Biochemistry
Chemistry
Science education
Other
Question 2
What is your specific area of study?
Question 3a
What stimulated your desire to earn a masters degree?
I needed the degree for my job
I needed the degree for a job for which I plan to apply
I am using the masters as a bridge to PhD study
This degree is purely for self improvement
other
Question 3b
Explain your answer to 3a here (if you have chosen ‘other’ or if you have more to tell us.)
characters remaining
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
Question 4
Who is your primary advisor/mentor?
Question 5
What kind of masters are you pursuing?
research and thesis
exam
certificate
education (30 over)
education specialization
other
Question 6
When is your expected graduation?
prior to spring 2012
Spring 12
Summer 12
Fall 12
Spring 13
Summer 13
Fall 13
Beyond 2013
Question 7
Are you planning to pursue a Ph.D.?
yes
No
Undecided
Question 8
If yes to question 7, identify your research area of interest (currently).
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
Question 9
If yes to question 7, to which Universities HAVE YOU ALREADY APPLIED? Provide name and
indicate whether you have been accepted.
Question 9a
If you have not yet applied to PhD programs, please indicate programs to which you are
planning to apply.
Question 10
What specific profession are you pursuing?
Question 11
What do like best about your masters study at CCNY? (list as many items as can fit in 300
characters!)
Question 12
How satisfied are you with the ease of meeting with an advisor?
dissatisfied
somewhat satisfied
satisfied
very satisfied
beyond expectation
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
Question 13
How satisfied are you with the academic advising you receive?
dissatisfied
somewhat satisfied
satisfied
very satisfied
beyond expectations
Question 14
How satisfied are you with advice and guidance concerning non-academic matters? (e.g.
career counseling, job placement, or other matters)
dissatisfied
somewhat satisfied
satisfied
very satisfied
beyond expectation
does not apply
Question 15
How satisfied are you with the registration process?
dissatisfied
somewhat satisfied
satisfied
very satisfied
beyond expectations
Question 16
What do you like least about your masters study at CCNY? (again, list all that can fit in 300
characters)
http://forum.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/Members/lizrud/masters-student-survey
Question 17
Which if any core facilities do you use? How satisfied are you with the core facilities?
Question 18
What if anything would you change regarding your masters experience at CCNY? (300 characters)
Question 19
What is your gender? (Optional)
male
female
Question 20
What is your ethnicity? (Optional)
African American
Asian
Caucasian
Latina
other
do not want to answer
Question 21
Do you currently work full time? (Optional)
Yes
No, only part time
No, not at all
How can we serve you better?
http://gradsurvey.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/
CCNY SCIENCE DIVISION ADVISING OFFICEPost-Graduation Exit Survey
*Your name:
*Your e-mail(1):
*Graduation Date:
1. What’s your next step after graduating. (Check all that apply)
Stayinschool
Lookforajob
Employed
Don’tknow/Prefernottoanswer
2. Staying in touch.
Yes,Iwouldliketostayintouchwiththecollege.IauthorizeaCCNY
representativetocontactmewithinthenext12months.
If you prefer someone to contact you please indicate person’s name and department below:
Contact’s Name:
Department:
* Required Answers
(1)Anemailmessagewithaconfirmationlinkwillbesenttotheaddressyouspecify.Clicking
onthelinkwillberequiredtocompletethissurvey.
For best experience, please use with Chrome, Firefox 10, Safari 5, or IE v 9 or 10.
Month: Year: