Cigarettes and Coffee
-
Upload
lucas-scott-wright -
Category
Documents
-
view
24 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Cigarettes and Coffee
Lucas Wright
Professor Isaacs
English 123
Coffee and Cigarettes: My Emergent Exploration and Confession
The Way I See It #1: Understanding Jell-O and Its Postmodern Ingredients
“The world is changed. I feel it in the water. I feel it in the earth. I smell it in the
air. Much that once was, is lost, for none now live who remember it”.1 This quote from
the movie The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring is the spoken manifestation
of a driving frame of mind and realization behind what has been called the “emerging
church”2 movement. At this point it may seem logical to begin an explanation of what the
movement really is, but that would be premature as it is first necessary to construct a new
mental frame of mind from which one may be able to correctly assess the movement in
its proper context.
The world has always been in a state of constant change and evolution, and along
with it so has the church. The current post-transitional3 transition period in which our
world is now immersed4 is the context in which the emerging movement is inspired and
moving. In recent years many have thought to put a finite definition to what this
1 The Lord Of The Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring was released in 2001 as an adaptation of the classic book written by J.R.R. Tolkien and contains many useful illustrations for the paradigm conflicts our world is now facing. 2 From here on out I will use the terms emerging and emergent interchangeably. I realize that most would identify a distinction between the two, but for the sake of length, and for my personal disagreement of this distinction they will both refer to the general movement with the focus being on the more emergent side. For more see Part 2. I would also like to point out that I am writing my own perception of the movement and its stances, and that this in no way is the complete unbiased analysis of the movement. 3 I use the term “post-transitional” not to indicate a state of being beyond transition, but to illustrate a current cultural transition that can only be summarized as being “post”, whether it be postmodern, post-colonialist, or post-Christian. 4 This I realize may seem a debatable statement of fact, but the opposition to the realization of this statement is a shrinking minority. Recommended reading: A New Kind of Christian (2001 Brian D. McLaren) for a Christian perspective on this “post” transition.
Wright 2
movement stands for, and what its mission is. While these attempts to define have been
well intentioned, they far fall short of anything that could be considered to do the
movement justice. The reason for their failure has been that they assume the emerging
movement can be caged into a systematic box of concepts and perspectives and put on a
shelf along with every other ideological or theological movement from the past. While it
is important to realize the historical connection between the emerging movement and the
church throughout history, it is a severe mistake to seek a finite label for this movement,
as that would undercut what the movement is all about. This does not mean that it is
impossible to illustrate temporal pictures of the movement, but one must realize, when
engaging the movement, that it is based on a foundational state of fluid motion and
unending evolution; both building on its predecessor’s constructs and demolishing them.
“Defining the emerging church is like nailing Jell-O to the wall. The
“what” and “who” of the movement are almost impossible to define. This
is due, in part, because the movement is new (at least in name and style if
not always in substance). New movements are always more amorphous
and less codified. But the Jell-O-like nature of the emerging church is also
intentional. It is, after all, a “conversation”.5
This so called “jell-O-like” nature of the movement is telling of the foundation upon
which the emerging movement bases its direction; postmodernity. If the traditional
Wright 3
5 Author and pastor Kevin DeYoung from the book Why We’re Not Emergent (By Two Guys Who Should Be) (2008 Moody Publishers). A generous critique of the movement, its “leaders”, and its literature.
American church of the last three decades was a reaction to modernity, then the emerging
church is most certainly a reaction to a postmodern state of culture in the world.
The name itself illustrates a great deal of the general postmodern ethic. It is clear
from this label that Postmodernity is an unfinished concept of what will become the
dominant paradigm or worldview from which people will view life in the universe. While
postmodernity is by its very nature fluid and uncertain, there are distinct principles it
follows in its existence.
It is first and foremost a reaction. It is a reaction to the strict dichotomy of truth
that was produced in modernity. Author Nancy Pearcey illustrates this dichotomy in her
acclaimed book Total Truth: Liberating Christianity From Its Cultural Captivity, in which
she illustrates what she has labeled the “two-realm theory of truth”. In this model
religious and moral truths were privatized as optional and seen as less than credible as
objective full truths. They were put on the lower realm. Scientific truth and the
philosophy of materialism were the “objective truths, and were placed on the upper
public level. Postmodernity reacts against this idea of objective truth by suggesting that
while there may be some objective truth, all people live under subjective worldviews.
The postmodern ethic then relieves the focus that was placed, in modernity, upon the
acceptance of objective scientific truth, and places it on the human inability to find see
objectively through a subjective lens.6 While this new openness regarding truth is an
important characteristic of postmodernity, it is important to see it’s in depth implications.
Wright 4
6 This would be seen by most as a moderate explanation of the postmodern perspective on truth. More extreme manifestations of postmodernity would argue that the truth itself is always subjective leaving no room for any solid objective truth. This view, while appealing to many in the current culture, is not postmodern but in fact relativism. While the two concepts share many similarities, it is important to note that they are not the same.
Not only does it illustrate a bridging of the modern dichotomy, but also it seeks a
complete restructuring of the ways in which people think. Brian D. McLaren writes,
“The fact that to us thinking and analyzing seem to be synonymous
suggests how successful modernity has been at marginalizing all other
forms of thought-imagination, intuition, pattern recognition, systems
thinking, and so on”.7
This explanation of modern thinking holds true to Pearcey’s two-realm theory of truth.
Society, including the church, has become so heavily dependent and entwined in
modernity that it views the process of thinking as just that, an analytical process by which
everything is input and then dissected into smaller parts. This is based on the assumption
that truth holds no ambiguity or mystery. While this assumption would seem normal and
perfectly acceptable to most people in the west, it does not hold up under scrutiny, as life
experience rarely exists without ambiguity or mystery. Life is full of mystery,
unexplainable phenomena, and horrible catastrophes, which defy all human reason and
analysis. It is this realization, which spurs the postmodern ethic forward. McLaren writes
again, “To be postmodern means to have experienced the modern world and to have been
changed by the experience-changed to such a degree that one is no longer modern”.8 The
key phrase in this quotation would be the “experienced the modern world”. In reaction to
the modern mind’s absolute analysis of life, the emerging postmodern desires to raise the
Wright 5
7 A New Kind Of Christian by Brian D. McLaren (Jossey-Bass, 2001). This book displays basic principles of the postmodern transition and asks what Christianity will look like in this new culture. This book and its message are cornerstones of the emerging movement.8 A New Kind Of Christian by Brian D. McLaren (Jossey-Bass, 2001). Again this book is an essential text for understanding this movement’s relation to postmodernity.
value of experience so that it can exists on par with all other areas of analytical truths
such as scientific theory.
The emerging movement realizes that within postmodernity lies an unprecedented
opportunity to bring Christian truth into culture as a truth that is accepted as credible and
holistic.9 Along with this realization comes an understanding of the differences between
modernity and postmodernity, which lead to an understanding of transition. In his book A
New Kind Of Christian, emergent figure Brian D. McLaren lists five phases that consist
of a worldview transition.
1. Stability, when life is fine, current theories explain everything
adequately, and questions are few-perhaps like Dorothy of The Wizard
of Oz living happily in Kansas
2. Discontinuity, when the old system seems to be working less well-
reflected socially in Dorothy’s conflict with her witchy neighbor,
psychologically in her ambivalent desire to run away from home, and
physically in the approaching thunderstorm
3. Disembedding, when we begin feeling that the current system is
insupportable and we begin to disconnect from it-like Dorothy being
carried away from Kansas by the tornado
4. Transition, when we haven’t fully left the old world and we haven’t
fully entered the new world-like Dorothy newly arrived in Oz trying to
get her bearings
Wright 6
9 The concept of holistic truth and faith are essential to the emerging movement and are discussed in part 2.
5. Reformation, when we decide to make a go of it in the new world we
have entered-like Dorothy setting out on her Journey to see the
Wizard, invigorated with new hope and passion. 10
To understand the emerging movement it is important to understand these principles of
transition, as the entire movement was started as a natural reaction to number two,
discontinuity. It is this feeling of the current way not amounting to any authentic spiritual
experience or real application to postmodern thinkers and culture that first triggered the
creation of the emerging church movement. It is also important to understand, if one is to
have a proper understanding of an emergent thinker’s mindset, where the culture and
church at large is in relation to this table of transition. A general consensus among
worldview observers indicates that in the past the various transitions, ancient to medieval
or enlightenment to modernity for example; take roughly fifty to sixty years. The
emerging stance on a position would put current culture about thirty years or so into
transition which in regard to McLaren’s five phases would put culture in phase three,
disembedding, with parts of it reaching into the fourth phase of real transition.
The emerging movement, with the aforementioned transitional position and
postmodern stance on truth influencing them considerably, has thus realized that for the
church to survive in transition, it too must transform. With this foundation of transition
and subjective worldview it is no wonder that so many within the traditional evangelical
and reformed traditions find the movement confusing and frustrating. A reason for this
Wright 7
frustration, aside from the vague and uncertain nature of the movement, is that at first
glance it seems the movement is nothing more than new liberalism and a protest against
10 A New Kind Of Christian by Brian D. McLaren (Jossey-Bass, 2001).
the boarder evangelical tradition. On the surface that may seem to be the case, but once
the postmodern foundation is taken into consideration it becomes clear that the emerging
movement is less of a cry against evangelicalism and more of cleansing water, which
seeks to wash away any negative effect modernity may have had on evangelical theology.
This point may be seen as out of place, but it is important to dispel such a rumor before
moving ahead with an investigation into emerging concepts since many of the
movement’s leaders claim to be evangelical Christians. With this in mind one can now
move into exploring emerging theology, methodology, missiology, and the various other
areas of emergent thought.
The Way I See It #2: The Journey out of Compartmentalization and the
Differentiation Between Contextualization and Emergent Holism
“emerge-the primal humility, vulnerability, and passion of a search for a way with
God together in the world we live in”.11 This quote, from the Emergent Village’s An
Emergent Manifesto of Hope, illustrates beautifully all that the emerging movement,
including what some define as the “emergent” distinction12, seeks to find. It is important
to note the language used, in particular the idea of a “passionate search for a way with
God”. To most in the emerging movement, this concept is a far cry from the intellectual
Wright 8
certainty and down pat answers that were presented by what they refer to as a Christian
faith tainted by the effects of modernity. This statement also helps those who are studying
the movement by holistically defining “emerge” as both the physical action of the church
11 Taken from Chapter 1, Growing Pains, of An Emergent Manifesto of Hope (Baker Books, 2007) by Emergent voice Mark Scandrette.12 I write “some define” not to tear down the circle of orthodoxy which divides most of the Emergent Village, but to express by own personal view that such a division is premature to the movement, and is upset by exceptions to the rule such as author and pastor Dan Kimball, and those who are still “up in the air” such as Rob Bell.
emerging in postmodern culture, and more importantly as a state of mind, which
encompasses every aspect of the Christian faith. This definition leads to one of the first
directional principles which, despite the diverse make-up of the movement, all in the
emerging ideal share.
One of the most important principles, which propel the Jell-O-like emerging
movement in a forward direction, is that of a holistic approach to the Gospel message and
faith within culture. This is a very loaded statement by itself and needs to be unpacked
within certain contexts, lest it be taken as heresy and bad methodology.13 To fully grasp
this concept, which many in the movement are trying to articulate, it is important to
realize that, as with most concepts of the emerging movement, it is both a realization and
a reaction. The first area in which this emergent holism is placed is that of presentation of
the Gospel by the Church. It should be noted that this would quickly bleed over into an
understanding of the actual theological stance of holistic faith in the emerging movement.
There are two overarching views regarding this concept of holistic faith in
emerge. The first, which is not so much an emerging concept as just the traditional idea
of contextualization, sees the Gospel of Jesus as the traditional narrative of the life, death,
and resurrection of Jesus Christ by which, through acceptance of God’s grace, humans
are saved from their sins through a legal sort of atonement. In this view the goal is the
Wright 9
contextualization of the Gospel by the Church, largely through changes in methodology
and presentation, to the existing and emerging postmodern cultures, in which the church
13 Certainly there are those I personally would take caution when approaching this subject (i.e. Doug Padgett and Tony Jones). This caution however, would be equally paralleled when dealing with someone considered more conservatively “orthodox” such as John McArthur of the Masters College and Seminary.
is now surrounded. Such changes in methodology relate to the postmodern nature of the
culture by utilizing more culturally relevant visuals, and transitioning from a systematic
Gospel presentation to a narrative presentation, which places more focus on real
encounters and experiences with God. While these principles are typical of most
emerging churches, the manifestations of them in ministry are unique and depend largely
on each Church’s unique cultural context. Pastor of Vintage Faith Church in Santa Cruz,
California writes,
“Instead of one emerging model, there are hundreds and thousands of
models of emerging churches. Modernity may have taught us to look for a
clean model to imitate. But in today’s postmodern context, it’s not that
simple. However, you can see striking patterns developing among
churches that are connecting with post-Christian hearts and minds all
across America, as well as in England”.14
As stated before, this is not a concept unique to the emerging movement, as
demonstrated by the seeker-sensitive movement led by Saddleback’s Rick Warren and
the Willow Creek model. Rather it is a newly renovated and improved version of
contextualization, which has been modified specifically for the various postmodern
manifestations in culture by removing many of the negative influences of movements
such as the seeker-sensitive. This, once again, is a reaction to the emerging culture.
Wright 10
“Today’s seekers are hungry for symbols and metaphors and experiences
and stories that reveal the greatness of God. Because seekers are
constantly changing, we must be sensitive to them like Jesus was; we must
14 From the book The Emerging Church (Zondervan YS, 2003), by Dan Kimball.
be willing to meet them on their own turf and speak to them in ways they
understand”.15
The second perspective regarding holistic faith and culture goes beyond the realm
of traditional contextualization through changed methodologies, and seeks to ask several
penetrating questions: 1.) What amount of “traditional” Christian faith in the west is a
construct of modernity? 2.) How has this modern mindset hindered people’s
interpretation of scripture and the Holy Spirit? 3.) What can Christians in a postmodern
world rediscover in the Gospel? 4.) Within postmodern culture, what does the label
Christian mean, and what does it look like to be a true follower of Christ?16 It is these
questions and the answers many of the Emergent leaders propose that are at the center of
the controversy surrounding the movement. It would seem, as the two-realm theory of
truth and other modern systems are deconstructed, that these questions are perfectly
logical. The truth is that they are essential for the future of the church.
The emergent movement identifies several aspects of “traditional” Christianity,
both theologically and practically, as modern constructions created not only in reaction to
the modern state, but also in relationship with modernity.17 A general list would consist
Wright 11
of traditional church structures, church location, the church’s affiliation with political
parties and ideologies, the development of systematic theologies and certain questionable
scriptural interpretations, and how Christians ought to view and hold scripture. This, for
15 Taken from Rick Warren’s forward in Dan Kimball’s The Emerging Church (Zondervan YS, 2003). 16 The movement looks to ask many more questions than these, but I feel that these are the most basic and essential questions, which emergent Christians base their journey on, myself included among them. 17 It is important to remember that this is a generalization and not all in the movement fell this way. I have chosen a more extreme version of the movement because I feel that it exists as the most pure form of emerge.
some, would seem to be a questioning of the very foundation upon which Christianity
rests however, the faith of Christians everywhere, as emergents see it, is dependant on
Christ and the Holy Spirit. Rather than see openness and uncertainty as something to be
feared and as evil, the emerging approach seeks to rely on the spirit over what would be
considered “orthodox tradition”. This allows the movement to flourish at the edge and
within the margins of modern western Christendom. With this in mind they are
comfortable, and even excited at the prospect of a renewal that is both overtly spiritual,
and outside the box of modern tradition. McLaren writes,
“the spiritual resurgence that I see brewing is unconventional and even
irreverent at times, largely developing outside the boundaries of our
institutional religion. But that to me says more about the rigidity of our
institutions than the darkness of our current spiritual resurgence”.18
It is important to note how McLaren addresses the “darkness of our current” in response
to the strong opposition against the neo-orthodox, emerging, and postmodern movements,
which have arisen amongst many conservative evangelical congregations. He addresses it
by first exposing the ironic situation many of the opposition find themselves in. Many
opposed to the emerging church movement are beginning to feel what many postmodern
Christians have been illustrating for a long time. The modern version of Christianity is
Wright 12
simply not sufficient for the period following modernity. The difference between many of
these opposing evangelicals and the emerging church however, is that where the
emerging movement sees weakness in the modern Gospel and opportunity for revival, the
18 A New Kind Of Christian by Brian D. McLaren (Jossey-Bass, 2001).
opposition sees a revival of Godless culture, which is simply unresponsive to the
Gospel.19 It is from this that some have coined the postmodern shift as a “a renewal of
paganism in western culture”. While this may be true in some non-Christian circles, it is a
vast assumption to make regarding the whole of postmodernity. It is this assumption that
then drives the opposition to condemnation of the culture and the movements, which seek
to integrate into culture, fearing that the church may fall into unrighteous syncretism.
This is a reasonable fear however; a similar question might then be posed to modern
churches in relation to their close ties to modernity.
The Way I See It #3: A Contrast of Gospels and The Emergent Concept of
Orthopraxy
The emerging movement seeks to, as stated in the opening quotation of part two,
find a way, together as a community, with God in the world in which humanity lives. To
do this the emerging movement longs to present a message of faith in Christ that contains
salvation both for our eternal souls and for the here and now. This means embracing a
holistic Gospel message which not only includes a salvation of penal substitution for sin,
but also embraces salvation as a new way of life; the Jesus Way as it is commonly
referred to among emergent circles.
Wright 13
“I was missing something, perhaps something important. Jesus’ cross in
the past saved me from hell in the future, but it was hard to be clear on
what it meant for me in the struggle of the present. And more importantly,
19 This again is a generalization, as proved by critiquing author D.A. Carson in his book Becoming Conversant With The Emerging Church (Zondervan, 2005), and authors Kevin Deyoung and Ted Kluck in their book Why We’re Not Emergent (By Two Guys Who Should Be) (Moody Publishers, 2008).
did the Gospel have anything to say about justice for the many, not just the
justification of the individual”? 20
This questioning is typical for most in the emerging movement. The modern Gospel
message was full of hope somewhere in the distant future, yet it was found lacking in the
areas of social justice, and communal salvation in the present here and now. A central
tenant of emergent backed theology and orthopraxy rests on a desire to realize and bring
to fruition God’s kingdom to the here and now of life through all that the Gospel entails,
both salvation from mankind’s depravity, and a call to walk the Jesus Way.
This concern for both the future and for the here and now is strikingly similar to
the Old Testament perception of God and salvation. It is similar in that the Hebrew
people of the Old Testament both loved and feared a God who was living and moving in
the world around them in both subversive and overt ways, but without any intricate
concept of a life beyond death. It bewilders many modern Christians, who have been
brought up on a fragmented Gospel, to think that the Hebrew people would fear and obey
Yahweh without any real concept of the afterlife.21 The emerging perception of the
Wright 14
Gospel however, embraces this as the way all Christians should interact with Christ and
his Gospel. This is not a view based on trying to change what has always been, but rather
a move towards reclaiming what once was; a holistic Gospel which is dependant on the
20 Taken from Chapter 1 of Brian McLaren’s A Generous Orthodoxy (Zondervan, 2004). A very useful book as it focuses in on the importance of individual and communal experience within an emergent Christian faith in Christ. 21 This dependence on future salvation, I believe, is one cause of the modern Church’s apathy and ignorance regarding social justice, poverty, and other evils our world faces. When God is going to destroy the earth, it does no good trying to save it or even preserve it seems to have been the main biblical interpretation which supported this kind of disregard for humanity. It is the hope of many, including myself and not just the emergents, that the focus will be, within proper context, on both the future we are saved to and the restoration of the here and now, and the fight for that restoration through following Jesus Christ.
living God who gives both salvation for the future and the restoration of justice and hope
for the here and now through living for Jesus and in the Jesus Way.
To explain this holistic Jesus Way, and to understand the emergent perception of
the Way, there must be an understanding of the term orthopraxy. Orthopraxy in the way
of emergence has grown to encompass not just orthodox practice based on orthodox
doctrine, but to define orthodox doctrine based upon practical experience and vice versa.
This concept, to some, may seem terribly out of order and, no pun intended, very
unorthodox.22 This definition however, is in fact more useful and true in many ways. It is
truer in that it acknowledges an interconnectedness, which flows both ways between both
doctrine and real world experience. An example would be this: a church decides that
based on the historically Caucasian majority in Christian congregations, and biblical
imagery of white representing purity that people of Caucasian persuasion are more
acceptable to God and better followers of Christ. On paper, this may seem to make sense
until however, someone from the congregation sees an African American who does a
better job of ministering to the lost and sharing the good news. There are now two
possibilities. Either the devil has taken on a new camouflage (a Christian), or the
Wright 15
doctrine of white supremacy is flawed.23 While this hypothetical situation is not perfect, it
illustrates well the idea of a two-way relationship between orthodox doctrine and
practice. A doctrine cannot exist as true if it proves contradictory to real life experience
22 While it may be defined in a truly unorthodox way by some in the emerging movement, I am choosing (in the spirit of the Emergent Way) to write generously and from my own perception and idea.23 I should hope the answer to this hypothetical situation is obvious.
or if the practice of that doctrine is impossible. The reverse would be to say that no
practice could be considered orthodox if it contradicts a doctrine, which has already been
seen as true. This perception of orthopraxy is more useful in that it better mirrors the
Christian life; meaning is exists upon a principle of interconnectedness and flowing
harmony. There is no compartmentalization or division with this definition. Theology is
the basis from which everything a Christian, and church does. Integration of theology and
methodology is essential to Emerge since everything is a theological issue whether it is
an issue of biblical interpretation or how church members are interacting with the
surrounding environment.24 It is this orthopraxy, which helps to propel the emergent
following of the Jesus Way.
The Way I See It #4: Generous Communal Faith and The Conversational
Theological Method
So what then does this Jesus Way and holistic approach consist of, and what is the
emerging movement doing to bring this into a practical way of faith? It is first and
foremost a generous way of faith guided by communal conversation.
A generous Christianity is a more holistic Christianity, because it
acknowledges how integrally interconnected we are with each other and
Wright 16
with the world. We are striving to be with God and with our neighbors, as
Jesus was and is with God and neighbor.25
24 Although I have not personally seen the DVD I would assume this is a basic understanding of what Rob Bell speaks about and means in his Everything is Spiritual sermons. I can also not help but think how this mirrors the reformed stance of doing everything to the glory of God. 25 Taken from chapter 3 of An Emergent Manifesto of Hope (Baker Books, 2007) by artist and pastor Nanette Sawyer. The title of this chapter (What Would Huckleberry Do? A Relational Ethic as the Jesus Way) speaks, I think, of the need and growth of this concept of a Jesus Way, which it seems we have lost.
It is important to notice the emphasis placed by this Emergent Village pastor on being
with God, while at the same time being with neighbor. To the emergent Christian the
state of being with God never exists apart from being in community with other believers,
and non-believers. If holistic faith is the primary tenant of the emerging way, then it is the
renewed importance of community, which propels the movement into holism.
Community formed with the emergent understanding of orthopraxy is the foundation for
everything within the emerging church movement. That being said, true authentic
community can only exist if real communication is made possible and then practiced.
This is where the use of the word conversation becomes so important.
“Conversation is mutual engagement in pursuit of wisdom . . .
Conversations move beyond claims and arguments toward understanding
that is beyond ideology; conversations encourage us to probe the
complexities of our world. Through ongoing conversation we learn to trust
the Holy Spirit’s presence in our lives, trusting that God is with us,
helping us to evaluate the information and the exchange”.26
Too often it seems that the Church interacts very negatively with itself when
disagreement arises. Whether it is over the issue of predestination vs. the sovereignty of
God, or where a church should hold its annual fellowship picnic, disagreement happens.
Wright 17
The emerging movement does not seek a mystical solution to disagreement within the
body of Christ; in fact the movement, at times, seems to encourage the opposite.
26 Taken from chapter 17, Orthoparadoxy: Emerging Hope for Embracing Difference, of An Emergent Manifesto of Hope (Baker Books, 2007) by author Dwight J. Friesen.
Disagreement is an integral part of life and certainly to healthy Church ministry.27 As
stated in the quote by Mr. Friesen, conversation encourages believers to move beyond
preconceived notions of truth and ideology, and move then forward towards a purer and
more accurate truth. This is not to say that conversation pushes members away from the
timeless truths of the Christian faith. A better way to phrase this might be to say that
conversation moves believers towards a more accurate understanding of the truth, which
has always existed. This aspect of the conversational method is absolutely essential to the
emerging movement since the entire movement is based upon open reexamination, and
the communication of the results this reexamination yields. By learning to see what has
always been from a different angle, the emerging movement yearns for a more complete
and total Christianity, which can build upon, but not be constricted by the tradition or
superficiality of modernity.
The concept of a conversation is also essential in that it removes the all too
common assumption that a vocal disagreement is synonymous with an aggressive debate.
Those within the emerging movement realize that much of the division that exists in
churches today is caused by harsh words, which come about in debates over everything
from church doctrine to petty cosmetic issues. It is here that the emerging idea of
Wright 18
conversation is especially relevant to the concept of community. For there to true and
authentic community with loving sharing individuals who respect and nurture each other,
there must be a defined line between healthy passionate discussions, and aggressive
27 Here I am talking about differing opinions and possible interpretations of some second and third tier doctrines. The more extreme in the movement would deem a church perfectly healthy even is there were no concrete agreements on primary Christian doctrine. I do not affirm this more extremist view. It should also be noted that this acknowledgment of disagreement is a perfect example of the emergent definition of orthopraxy, as seen in how it seeks an agreement with real life experience and the biblical principles of disagreement in love.
debates which only serve to divide and break down the body. While many would call this
an idealistic and naïve goal, those in the emerging movement believe that this
conversational method is possible and even closer to the calling of the Jesus Way.
Conversational community, like the any other concept in the movement, is
thought to be holistic, encompassing every topic possible. Included in this is theology. It
is the regular foundation of most churches and denominations to have a set of theological
stances and perspectives by which every member of the church must agree to if they are
to enter into the fellowship of the church. While this is great in some ways, it tends to
create what the emergent way would call a sort of “us, them” mentality among fellow
believers.
“We feel comfortable talking about ministry methodology and all types of
innovative new ideas, but when it comes to theology, we can sometimes
be very uptight and rigid. If we find that someone holds any theological
position other than that of our church or particular denomination, our
protective defenses go up. Anyone questioning any facet of our particular
theology is often perceived as trespassing into dangerous territory that
should not be entered. In the very place that should feel free to have
Wright 19
safe, open, and even fun theological discussions, sadly, this is the place
it can often be most dangerous.”28
28 Taken from Chapter 18, Humble Theology: Re-Exploring Doctrine While Holding Onto Truth, by Dan Kimball, of An Emergent Manifesto Of Hope (Baker, 2007). The bold print is of my own addition, but the textual content remains the same as the original printing.
It would seem that in many modern churches, the honest questioning and exploration of
theology by members and even staff is discouraged. Based on what Dan Kimball has
stated, this is a serious misunderstanding of how communication and theology are to be
related in a church context. It is absurd to think that the church should be a place of rigid
theological principle. That is not to assume that the church should have no solid
theological foundation, but that open exploration as to why there is such a foundation is
to be encouraged, and even demanded of staff members. Pushing the boundaries and
reexamining the tradition is within emergent orthopraxy, and essential to healthy
theological study. In this, the emerging church movement cries out for safe haven among
churches so that Christians everywhere may engage in open and honest conversation, in
order to bring one another closer to God’s truth. This not only impacts individual one-
time communication, but the entire process of discipleship. The emerging concept of
discipleship will focus on each disciple wrestling with theology in a real living fight that
will lead to authentic belief and understanding, all within the context of the church.
The Way I See It #5: Communal Theology and Unselfish Salvation
The last core concept of emerge builds on the previous concept of conversational
communal faith, and on salvation for the here and now of life.29 The traditional focus of
the Gospel message of salvation, as stated earlier, has been salvation for the afterlife. As
Wright 20
mentioned previously, the emerging movement denies that this is the complete message,
and tries to view the gospel message holistically. While this does include focusing on
both the afterlife and the present reality of life, it also includes rethinking the structural
29 I say the last core concept for the sake of this paper’s length since the scope and influence of the movement goes far beyond the five parts of this paper.
nature of salvation through Christ. Modernity brought to the Church, among other things,
an idea of individualism. This individualistic approach was useful and healthy at first, as
it allowed the church to break free of the almost totalitarian state affiliation of its
members. As time progressed however, it created some very unhealthy views, which
produced a self-centered Gospel that was focused more on the value of humanity than
that of the glory of God. The effects of this can be seen in the various catch phrases used
in modern reference to Christ as the “personal” savior. While Christ does save individuals
it is both inconsistent with the biblical text, and very self-absorbed to make the
commonly heard assumption that even if there were only one human on earth, God would
have sent Jesus to save that one singular soul.
“ Can’t seeking my personal salvation as the ultimate end become the
ultimate consumerism or narcissism? . . . Doesn’t being preoccupied with
our own individual salvation put us in danger of being like the selfish
people on the Titanic who were scrambling for the life rafts, more
concerned about themselves than others? . . . I am a Christian because I
believe that Jesus is the savior of the whole world”.30
Wright 21
Some might view this as an introduction to a universalistic Gospel, but that would be a
severe misinterpretation.31 McLaren is speaking about a growing mood and opinion,
which longs to break free of the narcissistic feel of the “personal gospel”. It is true that
30 Excerpt is taken from chapter 4, Jesus: Savior of What?, of A Generous Orthodoxy (Zondervan, 2004). This chapter has a great deal more to say on the subject of salvation of the here and now, but for the purpose of this portion of the paper I will only deal specifically with the subject of communal salvation. 31 While I cannot state with certainty, it is a general assumption among most evangelicals that Brian McLaren is indeed an inclusivist who borders on a relative universalism.
Jesus is a personal savior, yet it is also true that Jesus is the savior of his community. The
church as a body is saved from its iniquity, and reconciled to God as a complete
community. The emerging movement allows for a more complete perspective on
salvation, incorporating both the personal and communal aspects as essential parts of
God’s saving grace.
The Way I See It #6: An Open Conclusion
The emerging movement is one that is both frustratingly controversial, and full of
pure inspiration and hope. It seeks to acknowledge God’s sovereignty and power within
all cultures and times, and to bring the church into real and authentic communion with
Christ. It is true that it has its flaws, but so does every movement, from the brutal revolt
of Protestants in Europe to the tent revivals of the Wesley brothers; whenever the church
moves it is exciting and dangerous. To state a conclusion would be premature with such a
movement as this, as it will only be proven wrong a month from the current. As time
moves on so will the emerging movement, growing and maturing and eventually dying,
giving way to the next emergence of the church of Jesus Christ in an always lost and
suffering world.