CHƯƠNG 1 TÍNH CHẤT DẪN ĐIỆN CỦA DUNG DỊCH ĐIỆN LY

download CHƯƠNG 1 TÍNH CHẤT DẪN ĐIỆN CỦA DUNG DỊCH ĐIỆN LY

of 50

Transcript of CHƯƠNG 1 TÍNH CHẤT DẪN ĐIỆN CỦA DUNG DỊCH ĐIỆN LY

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    1/50

    Physical Chemistry II

    7.3 conductivity of solution

    Feb. 25, 2003

    Chapter VII Electrolytic solution

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    2/50

    Conducting mechanism of electrolytic

    solution

    MzF

    Qm

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    3/50

    Motion of ions in the solution:

    Only the transfer can cause net electricity

    1) diffusion: due to difference inconcentration

    2) convection: due to the difference indensity or temperature

    3) transfer: due to electric field

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    4/50

    7.3.1 conductance and its measurement

    For metals:

    Ohm s Law

    I

    UR

    R: resistance

    Dimension: Ohm,

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    5/50

    resistivity

    A

    l

    R

    Dimension: Ohm m, m

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    6/50

    For electrolytic solution:

    conductivity () or spedific conductance:

    Definition: = 1/

    Dimension: S m-1

    electric conductance (G) :

    Definition: G = 1/R

    Dimension:-1, mho, Siemens, S

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    7/50

    conductivity cell

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    8/50

    Type 206

    conductance electrode

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    9/50

    WheatstoneBridge

    Circuit

    High-frequency alternative current, ca. 1000

    Hertz

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    10/50

    R3 R2 = R4 R1

    4

    321

    R

    RRR

    1

    1

    R

    G

    GKA

    lG

    cell

    RKcell

    Cell constant of a

    conductivity cell

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    11/50

    The conductance cell is usually calibrated with

    standard KCl (potassium chloride ) solution.

    xxss RR RKcell

    11.21.2890.14110.01470/S m-1

    1.00.10.010.0010C/ mol dm-

    3

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    12/50

    7.3.2 influential factors for conductivity

    1) concentrationdependence of

    conductance

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    13/50

    1. Acids and bases

    have higherconductance

    2. C < 5 mol dm-3

    , increases with C

    3. For CH3COOH conductance does

    not depend on C

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    14/50

    (2) temperature-

    dependence ofconductance

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    15/50

    1. 38 % H2SO4 was

    used in acid-leadbattery;

    2. Hot electrolytewas used for

    electrolysis and

    electroplating

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    16/50

    At room temperature, conductivity of

    solution increases by 2% for per degreecentigrade.

    )]25(')25('1[)( 25 TTT

    PP TT

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    17/50

    7.3.3 Molar conductivity

    Cm

    V

    V

    m 11) Definition

    V: degree of dilution

    The conductivity of a solution is approximatelyproportional to the concentration

    m is the conductivity contributed by 1 mole ofelectrolyte between electrodes of 1 m apart

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    18/50

    Dependence of molar conductivity

    on concentration

    m decreases withconcentration.

    Kohlrausch replotted

    m

    against C1/2

    Due to the interaction

    between ions:

    interionic attraction

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    19/50

    For 1:1

    electrolytes:

    C < 0.002~ 0.003

    mol dm-3

    Linear

    relationship

    between m

    and

    C1/2 can be

    observed.

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    20/50

    Kohlrausch empirical formula

    cAmm

    To extrapolate the linear part ofm ~ C1/2

    at low concentration to C = 0, m can be

    obtained.m

    the limiting value ofm at infinite

    dilution: limiting molar conductivity

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    21/50

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    22/50

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    23/50

    7.3.4 Kohlrausch s law of independent

    ionic mobilities

    ,, mmm

    At infinite dilution, m should be

    the sum of the separatecontributions of the ions

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    24/50

    limiting molar conductivity of

    weak electrolyte

    )()()( AcHHAc

    mmm

    )()()(

    )()()(

    ClNaAc

    NaClH

    mmm

    mmm

    )()()( NaClNaAcHClmmm

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    25/50

    7.3.5 ionic mobility and transference

    number of ions

    1) Ionic mobility

    dl

    dEr

    dl

    dEUr

    Under unit potential gradient: dE/dl = 1

    V m-1: U = R, ionic mobility

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    26/50

    I = I+ + I-

    Q = Q+ + Q- Q

    Qt

    j

    j

    The fraction of the current transported by an ion

    is its transference number or transport number

    t = t+ + t- =

    1

    2) Transference number

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    27/50

    3) Relation between ionic mobility and

    transference number

    C-, Z-, U-; C+, Z+, U+;For time t: Q+ = A U+t C+ Z+ F

    Q = A Ut CZF

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    28/50

    Q = Q+ + Q =AtF( U+C+ Z+ + U C

    Z

    )

    C+ Z+ =C Z

    Q =AtFC+ Z+ ( U+ + U

    )

    UU

    Ut

    UU

    Ut

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    29/50

    4) Relation between transference

    number and molar conductivity

    I+ = AU+Z+C+F I = AUZ

    C FI = I++ I =AC+Z+F(U++U

    )

    VUUFZACG )(

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    30/50

    )(

    )(

    )(

    UUFZCl

    VUUFZC

    Al

    VUUFZAC

    AlG

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    31/50

    C

    UUFZCm

    )(

    For uni-univalent electrolyte:

    )(

    UUFm

    ,, mmm

    FUm ,

    FUm

    ,

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    32/50

    t

    FUU

    FU

    m

    m

    )(

    ,

    mm t, mm t,

    To measure m,+ orm,- , either t+ and t-or U+ and U- must be determined

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    33/50

    7.3.6 measurement of transference numbers

    1) Hittorf method (1853)

    Electrolysis of HCl solution

    Anodic region cathodic regionBulk solution

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    34/50

    4 Cl-

    -4e- 2 Cl2 4 H+ +4e- 2 H2

    When 4 Faraday pass through the electrolytic cell

    3 mol H+ 1 mol Cl-

    3 mol H+ 1 mol Cl-

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    35/50

    Cresidual = Cinitial Creact + Ctransfer3 = 6 4 + Ctransfer

    For anodic region:

    t- = 1 / 4 = 0.25 t+ = 3 / 4 = 0.75

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    36/50

    Hittorf s

    transference cell

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    37/50

    Example

    Pt electrode, FeCl3 solution:

    In cathodic compartment:

    Initial: FeCl3 4.00 mol dm-3

    Final: FeCl3 3.150 mol dm-3

    FeCl2 1.000 mol dm-3

    Calculate the transference number of Fe3+

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    38/50

    2) The moving-boundary

    method

    MA, MA have an ion in

    common. The boundary,

    rather difference in color,

    refractivity, etc. is sharp.

    In the steady state, the twoions move with the same

    velocity.

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    39/50

    When Q coulomb passes, the

    boundary moves x, the cross-sectional area of the tube is

    A:

    xACZ+F = t+Q

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    40/50

    Sample:

    When A = 1.05 10-5 m2, C(HCl) = 10.0 molm-3, I = 0.01 A for 200 s, x was measured to be

    0.17 m. Please calculate t (H+)

    Solution:

    t+ = 0.17 m 1.05 10-5 m2 10.0 mol m-3

    1

    96500 C mol-1 / 0.01 A 200 S

    = 0.82

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    41/50

    7.3.7 factors on transference number

    1) temperature

    0.48850.48860.48870.488935

    0.49010.49020.49030.490625

    0.49240.49250.49260.492815

    0.020.010.0050.000T / oC

    Table Transference number of K+ in KCl solution

    at different concentration and temperature

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    42/50

    2) co-existed ions

    0.17490.50980.60800.6711t

    HClKClNaClLiClelectrolyte

    0.50840.48840.48330.4902t+

    KNO3KIKBrKClelectrolyte

    UU

    Ut

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    43/50

    7.3.8 Influential factors for m

    1) the nature of ions

    (1) Charge

    (4) Mechanism

    (3) Electric character

    (2) Radium

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    44/50

    2.091.04La3+

    2.040.67Fe3+4.420--Fe(CN)6

    4

    1.890.57Al3+

    3.030--Fe(CN)631.1891.04Sr2+

    1.48--C2O42-1.1901.04Ca2+

    1.66--CO32 1.0610.74Mg2+

    0.7841.96Br0.7351.37K+

    0.7631.81Cl0.5010.98Na+0.5541.23F0.3870.68Li+1.98--OH3.4982--H+

    102

    m

    r / nmions102

    m

    r / nmions

    Limiting molar conductivity of ions

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    45/50

    Mechanism of hydrogen and hydroxyl

    ions

    Grotthus mechanism (1805)

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    46/50

    2) Viscosity of the solvents

    0.00150.00400.0075Li+

    0.00220.00540.0082K+

    1.2000.5470.316 /mPas

    Ethyl

    alcohol

    Methyl

    alcohol

    acetone

    Table. Viscosity of solvent on limiting molarconductivity of ions

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    47/50

    The Stokes s law

    r

    FeZ

    m )300(6,

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    48/50

    Problems

    1. Make comparison between Hittorf smethod and moving boundary method.

    2. Why the limiting molar conductivity of

    weak electrolyte can not be obtained by

    extrapolating ofm ~ C1/2.

    3. What experimental results back up theKohlrausch s Law of independent ionic

    mobilities

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    49/50

    4. Summarize the effect of ionic nature on

    limiting molar conductivity of ions

  • 8/3/2019 CHNG 1 TNH CHT DN IN CA DUNG DCH IN LY

    50/50

    Exercises

    p. 573, ex. 4

    ex. 7

    ex. 9

    ex. 13