Christmas Carol: Social Background

1
Christmas Carol Teacher’s Edition http://christmascarol.esolebooks.com/ Christmas Carol Teacher’s Edition http://christmascarol.esolebooks.com/ A Christmas Carol: Social Context How Charles Dickens changed Christmas In many ways Charles Dickens helped create our modern idea of Christmas. Christmas was of course an established tradition when he wrote his story, but it was a much smaller festival than the one celebrated in the Englishspeaking world today. For a start it largely consisted of a single day – Scrooge was expected to allow Bob the day off – but no more than that. Christmas Day was a religious holiday – another Sunday in effect. Dickens helped change this public act of duty into what historian Ronald Hutton calls ‘a familycentered festival of generosity’. A Christmas Carol created a new approach to Christmas based on: Family Celebration Food (Christmas Dinner) Charity – giving money to good causes at Christmas Christmas greetings – (‘Merry Christmas!) Generosity of spirit (the opposite of ‘Bah Humbug!’) The Poor Laws Charles Dickens became rich and very famous but he never forgot the poverty of his childhood. When he was eleven years old his father got into serious financial trouble and spent a short period in prison. This resulted in Charles being taken out of school and forced to work in a shoepolish factory, Dickens also worked as a journalist during the 1830s and saw the result of the disastrous New Poor Law of 1834. The new poorhouses were intended to help control the increasing problem of poverty and destitution but only succeeded in making the situation much worse. Scrooge defends the thinking behind the Poor Law (‘Are there no prisons?’) in Stave 1. Later the spirits convert him to a more generous attitude to poverty. Thomas Malthus: Population Scrooge also defends the theories of Thomas Malthus in Stave One and these views are quoted back to him by the Spirit of Christmas Yet to Come. Malthus argued in his Essay on the Principle of Population (1798) that population growth would always outpace food supply resulting in unavoidable and catastrophic poverty and starvation. Malthus supported the Poor Laws and the workhouses, arguing that a man unable to sustain himself had no right to live, much less participate in the development of society. The Cratchits are Dickens' counter argument to what he saw as the brutality of the Malthus theory. We see that Bob is a good man in hard times – and deserves support. It should be remembered, however, that Dickens is not promoting the modern idea of state welfare. It is Scrooge (the employer) who comes to Bob’s assistance. A Christmas Carol essentially deals with the responsibility of the individual to the less fortunate.

description

Brief notes on the social context of the classic Dickens story.Many more Christmas Carol Teaching materials here: http://tiny.cc/32bo2w

Transcript of Christmas Carol: Social Background

Page 1: Christmas Carol: Social Background

Christmas  Carol  Teacher’s  Edition     http://christmascarol.esolebooks.com/  

Christmas  Carol  Teacher’s  Edition     http://christmascarol.esolebooks.com/  

A  Christmas  Carol:  Social  Context    How  Charles  Dickens  changed  Christmas  In  many  ways  Charles  Dickens  helped  create  our  modern  idea  of  Christmas.  Christmas  was  of  course  an  established  tradition  when  he  wrote  his  story,  but  it  was  a  much  smaller  festival  than  the  one  celebrated  in  the  English-­‐speaking  world  today.    For  a  start  it  largely  consisted  of  a  single  day  –  Scrooge  was  expected  to  allow  Bob  the  day  off  –  but  no  more  than  that.  Christmas  Day  was  a  religious  holiday  –  another  Sunday  in  effect.    Dickens  helped  change  this  public  act  of  duty  into  what  historian  Ronald  Hutton  calls  ‘a  family-­‐centered  festival  of  generosity’.    A  Christmas  Carol  created  a  new  approach  to  Christmas  based  on:  

• Family  Celebration    • Food  (Christmas  Dinner)  • Charity  –  giving  money  to  good  causes  at  Christmas  • Christmas  greetings  –  (‘Merry  Christmas!)  • Generosity  of  spirit  -­‐    (the  opposite  of  ‘Bah  Humbug!’)  

 The  Poor  Laws    Charles  Dickens  became  rich  and  very  famous  but  he  never  forgot  the  poverty  of  his  childhood.  When  he  was  eleven  years  old  his  father  got  into  serious  financial  trouble  and  spent  a  short  period  in  prison.  This  resulted  in  Charles  being  taken  out  of  school  and  forced  to  work  in  a  shoe-­‐polish  factory,      Dickens  also  worked  as  a  journalist  during  the  1830s  and  saw  the  result  of  the  disastrous  New  Poor  Law  of  1834.  The  new  poor-­‐houses  were  intended  to  help  control  the  increasing  problem  of  poverty  and  destitution  but  only  succeeded  in  making  the  situation  much  worse.  Scrooge  defends  the  thinking  behind  the  Poor  Law  (‘Are  there  no  prisons?’)  in  Stave  1.  Later  the  spirits  convert  him  to  a  more  generous  attitude  to  poverty.    Thomas  Malthus:  Population  Scrooge  also  defends  the  theories  of  Thomas  Malthus  in  Stave  One  and  these  views  are  quoted  back  to  him  by  the  Spirit  of  Christmas  Yet  to  Come.  Malthus  argued  in  his  Essay  on  the  Principle  of  Population  (1798)  that  population  growth  would  always  outpace  food  supply  resulting  in  unavoidable  and  catastrophic  poverty  and  starvation.        Malthus  supported  the  Poor  Laws  and  the  workhouses,  arguing  that  a  man  unable  to  sustain  himself  had  no  right  to  live,  much  less  participate  in  the  development  of  society.      The  Cratchits  are  Dickens'  counter  argument  to  what  he  saw  as  the  brutality  of  the  Malthus  theory.  We  see  that  Bob  is  a  good  man  in  hard  times  –  and  deserves  support.  It  should  be  remembered,  however,  that  Dickens  is  not  promoting  the  modern  idea  of  state  welfare.  It  is  Scrooge  (the  employer)  who  comes  to  Bob’s  assistance.  A  Christmas  Carol  essentially  deals  with  the  responsibility  of  the  individual  to  the  less  fortunate.