Christensen 71

download Christensen 71

of 17

Transcript of Christensen 71

  • 7/25/2019 Christensen 71

    1/17

    The Econometric Societyis collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access toEconometrica.

    http://www.jstor.org

    Economic Theory of Organisation IISource: Econometrica, Vol. 39, No. 4 (Jul., 1971), pp. 251-266Published by: The Econometric SocietyStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1912451Accessed: 01-07-2015 08:50 UTC

    Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

    JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of contentin a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

    This content downloaded from 193.205.30.1 on Wed, 01 Jul 2015 08:50:27 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=econosochttp://www.jstor.org/stable/1912451http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/stable/1912451http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=econosochttp://www.jstor.org/
  • 7/25/2019 Christensen 71

    2/17

    86 ECONOMIC THEORY

    OF ORGANISATION

    II

    251

    goods. The consumer is able to hold his

    wealth in the form of

    one or more of M

    assets,

    of

    which one is riskless. Consumer

    durables are

    modelled as being in part

    consumption goods, and in

    part assets.

    The prices of goods are assumed independently and nonstationarily distrib-

    uted,

    so as

    to allow

    for

    inflation. The real returns

    on

    the

    (M

    -

    1) risky

    assets are

    assumed to be state

    dependent,

    and

    the

    consumer is

    assumed

    to

    know

    the

    prob-

    ability distribution

    of

    the states and also the

    conditional distributions

    of returns

    given the states.

    The consumer

    enters a period knowing

    the prices of the goods, and the

    state,

    and he chooses

    his

    consumption

    of

    each of the goods, and his

    portfolio

    decision

    so

    as

    to

    maximize his expected utility.

    The problem he

    faces is one of

    dynamic stochastic programming. By using

    particular

    functional forms for

    the indirect utility function it is possible to solve this

    problem

    by

    a

    recursive

    procedure in order to arrive at optimal

    expenditure and

    investment rules for

    any period

    t

    = 0,

    . .

    .,

    T

    After we have determined the expenditure

    rule, we

    convert

    from the

    indirect

    utility function to the expenditure

    function,

    and differentiate

    this with

    respect

    to

    the

    price

    vector to arrive at the demand

    equation

    vector for

    goods

    and the services

    of durables.

    This has

    a functional

    form which

    corresponds

    to

    the

    expenditure

    function.

    The demand

    equations for assets, and the asset component of

    durables

    come

    directly

    from

    the

    rule for

    the

    optimum portfolio

    composition.

    86

    ECONOMIC

    THEORY OF

    ORGANISATION II

    On

    the

    Motivational Stability of a Planning

    Procedure for

    Non-Classical Environ-

    ments, Masahiko Aoki, Kyoto

    University and

    Harvard

    University

    In

    recent years, various

    planning procedures

    have been proposed with some

    desirable

    performance characteristics besides their

    convergence

    to an optimal

    resource allocation plan

    [e.g.,

    informational

    efficiency (Arrow-Hurwicz), feasi-

    bility

    of a

    plan constructed

    in

    finite

    steps (Malinvaud and

    Kornai) among others].

    But, if we allow

    for the possibility of such

    non-classical

    environments as increasing

    returns and

    externalities, it may be considered that there is a kind

    of

    trade-off

    among

    various

    desirable

    performance

    characteristics. Especially,

    informational

    efficiency

    as

    defined by Hurwicz and

    the self-interest of

    individual managers will

    be in

    direct conflict.

    In

    this paper,

    two kinds

    of

    desirable properties of

    a planning procedure

    from the motivational

    point

    of

    view,

    that

    is,

    the consistencies

    of

    the

    operation

    rules and

    a

    success indicator

    for

    managers,

    will be

    formulated.

    If

    a

    planning

    procedure satisfies these two

    properties,

    then the

    procedure

    will be

    called

    motivationally-stable.

    Then

    the two

    procedures

    that can

    cope

    with

    increasing

    returns

    and

    externalities

    will be

    proposed. They

    are

    both

    motivationally-stable,

    This content downloaded from 193.205.30.1 on Wed, 01 Jul 2015 08:50:27 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 7/25/2019 Christensen 71

    3/17

    252 SECOND

    WORLD

    CONGRESS

    but informationally-less-efficient

    than the

    competitive procedure

    as

    proposed

    by

    Arrow and Hurwicz.

    REFERENCES

    [1]

    AOKI,

    M.: Investment

    Planning Procedure for an Open

    Economy with Increasing

    Returns (Harvard

    Economic Research Project, 1969).

    [2] ARROW, K.

    J.

    AND

    L.

    HURWICZ:

    Decentralization and Computation in

    Resource Allocation,

    in R. W. Pfouts

    (ed.): Essays in Economics and Econometrics

    (University

    of North Carolina Press,

    1960), pp. 34-104.

    [3] HURWICZ,

    .: Optimality and Informational Efficiency

    in Resource

    Allocation Processes, in

    K. J. Arrow, et al. (eds.): Mathematical

    Methods in the

    Social Sciences, 1959 (Stanford University

    Press, 1960),

    pp. 27-46.

    Centralization and Decentralization of Decision-Making Mechanisms: A General

    Model,

    Antonio Camacho,

    Northwestern University

    A

    general

    decisiort

    making

    model

    is

    presented

    under which the

    notions

    degree

    of centralization and

    degree of coerciveness can

    be precisely defined.

    Hurwicz,

    in

    his 1959 pioneer paper

    on this

    field, Optimality

    and Informational

    Efficiency

    in

    Resource

    Allocation Processes,

    formalizes the notion of informa-

    tion

    decentralization

    by imposing certain conditions

    (regardingthe domain type

    of

    messages, etc.)

    that the

    response

    functions

    or behavior rules of the participants

    in

    the decision making process have to satisfy. This author followedthe same approach

    in

    his 1957 paper Externalities,

    Optimality

    and Informationally Decentralized

    Resource

    Allocation Mechanisms.

    In the

    present model,

    unlike the other

    two

    models mentioned

    above, a new

    agent (the

    central

    agent)

    is

    introduced.

    The

    degree

    of

    centralization and the degree

    of coerciveness are then defined by

    the relation between the behavioral

    rule.

    of the

    central agent and the behavioral

    rules of the

    other participants, called in

    our

    model the

    management agents.

    Several

    examples

    are considered

    to

    compare

    the

    performance

    of centralized

    and decentralized decision making processes. In particular a simple team model

    with two management agents,

    a central

    agent,

    and

    a

    payoff

    function w

    =

    c

    -

    k1[al

    -

    (e1 + e2)]2 -

    k2[a2-

    (e1

    +

    e2)]2

    -

    k(a1

    -

    a2)2

    is studied. If

    we

    accept

    as a measure

    of the

    degree

    of

    externality

    the

    value of

    (a2w)/(aalaa2)

    =

    2k,

    it

    is

    shown

    that

    for

    a

    given

    natural structure of information

    and for

    given

    natural behavior rules,

    the decentralized

    decision

    making process performs

    better than the

    centralized

    one no

    matter

    how

    high

    the

    externality

    is. This

    example

    suggests (at

    least

    under the

    context

    of

    our

    model) that,

    contrary

    to

    what has been

    advocated

    in

    part

    of the

    economic

    literature,

    the solution to the

    problem

    of

    externalities is not always internalizing or centralizing.

    Growth,Stability,

    and

    Disequilibrium,

    John

    Ledyard, Carnegie-Mellon

    University

    In

    this

    paper,

    a

    disequilibrium

    action, informationally

    decentralized,

    economic

    allocation

    process

    is

    presented

    and

    its

    performance

    in two classes of

    economic

    This content downloaded from 193.205.30.1 on Wed, 01 Jul 2015 08:50:27 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 7/25/2019 Christensen 71

    4/17

    86

    ECONOMIC THEORY OF

    ORGANISATION

    II

    253

    environments is

    discussed. The

    process allows

    trading,

    consumption,

    and

    produc-

    tion

    to occur

    even

    though

    equilibrium

    does

    not exist, as

    opposed

    to the

    usual

    non-tatonnement

    process in which

    the

    only

    allowable

    disequilibrium

    action

    is

    trading. The process is based on the reallocation of resources towards consumers

    whose

    demand

    prices,

    marginal

    utilities, are

    high and

    away

    from those

    whose

    prices are

    low.

    Production is

    price directed

    as

    in

    the usual

    competitive

    market

    process.

    The

    environments

    covered are

    among those

    which

    can be

    interpreted as

    optimal

    control

    problems, and

    the process

    only

    requires that

    each

    individual

    know

    the

    current

    environmental

    conditions. (E.g., no

    knowledge of

    future

    technology

    is

    necessary.)

    These

    environments

    are split

    into

    two classes,

    pure

    flow and

    stock-flow

    depending on

    whether or not

    stock

    accumulation

    (i.e.,

    investment)

    is feasible.

    Since

    it

    is

    possible for

    such

    a process

    to

    be

    Pareto-satisfactory

    only in

    environments whose

    Pareto-optimal

    allocations are

    steady-state solutions

    and

    then

    only if

    the initial

    trading rates are

    optimal, a slightly

    less

    restrictive

    performance

    criterion is

    proposed.

    This

    requires that

    the

    process

    closely

    track the

    optimal path

    if it

    starts

    close to it. It is

    shown

    that,

    in

    pure

    flow

    environments,

    if

    the

    optimal

    path

    is not

    changing too

    rapidly

    then the

    process

    satisfies the

    above criterion.

    It is

    also

    shown

    that, in

    stock-flow

    environments, the

    process

    will not

    satisfy the

    criterion.

    In

    fact,

    there are a

    large

    number

    of

    processes

    which

    cannot track the

    optimal path

    in stock-flow environments. This result is based on the

    lack of

    Liapunov

    stability

    of

    the

    Euler-Lagrange

    equations, the first

    order

    conditions

    for

    optimal

    control,

    and

    indirectly extends

    the

    results of Hahn

    and Kurz,

    on

    the instability

    of com-

    petitive (or

    equilibrium

    action) growth

    paths,

    to some

    types of

    disequilibrium

    action

    processes.

    Planning

    for

    Individual

    and Collective

    Consumption,

    E.

    Malinvaud,

    Institut

    National de

    la

    Statistique

    et

    des Etudes

    Economiques

    The

    theory

    of

    public

    goods should

    benefit much from

    the

    formal

    study

    of

    planning

    procedures since

    the

    problem

    raised

    by

    collective

    consumption

    is

    precisely to

    understand how

    the

    provision for

    this

    consumption

    is,

    or

    should

    be,

    decided.

    Let us consider the

    bipolar model

    in

    which the

    commodities are

    divided into

    two

    groups:

    r

    collective

    goods

    (h

    =

    1,

    2

    ...

    r)

    that

    may

    be

    used,

    jointly

    and without

    any

    exclusion, by

    all individual

    consumers

    (i

    =

    1,

    2

    ...

    m)

    simultaneously,

    n

    -

    r

    private

    goods (h

    =

    r

    +

    1

    ...

    n)

    for

    which use

    by

    one

    consumer

    is

    exclusive

    of use

    by

    another.

    Let

    the

    consumptions

    be

    xh

    and

    Xih

    for

    commodities

    in

    one

    and

    the

    other

    of

    these

    two

    groups.

    Assume further

    that

    production

    is

    completely

    centralized

    and

    that the

    n-vector

    y

    of

    quantities

    available

    for

    consumption

    is

    subject

    to the

    constraint

    f(y)

    =

    0.

    This content downloaded from 193.205.30.1 on Wed, 01 Jul 2015 08:50:27 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 7/25/2019 Christensen 71

    5/17

    254 SECOND WORLD CONGRESS

    Looking for realistic planning procedures we

    concentrate our attention

    on

    those

    using the following

    indicators

    to

    be sent to consumers:

    -for each collective

    good (h

    =

    1,

    2. .

    .

    r)

    the

    consumption Xh,

    -for each

    good

    that

    is

    individually

    consumed

    (h

    =

    r

    + 1,

    ...,

    n) the

    price

    Ph,

    -for each consumer

    (i

    =

    1,

    2 ...

    m)

    the income

    Ri

    to be

    spent

    on

    private goods.

    Correspondingly the proposal of consumer i

    will

    consist of two

    parts:

    -a demand

    Xih

    for each

    private good h,

    -a trade-off coefficient

    7rih

    =

    Uih/Ufl

    that the consumer considers as

    applying

    between

    each collective

    good

    h and the

    numeraire n.

    A

    consumptionprogram

    will

    appear

    at each

    stage

    of the

    process.

    It will

    be

    made

    of

    the

    Xh

    indicated

    by

    the

    board for

    each collective

    good

    and

    of

    the

    Xih

    proposed by

    each consumer

    for each

    private good.

    But this

    program will

    not

    necessarily be feasible. We

    therefore

    define also,

    at each

    stage

    of the

    process, a

    consumptionplan

    as

    being

    made of

    those values

    xh

    and

    Xih

    that would be

    selected

    if

    the

    exchange

    of

    messages were

    to end

    at this stage.

    The

    main

    point

    for

    a

    precise

    definition of the

    procedure

    concerns

    the revision

    of

    indicators. We shall consider

    the

    following

    rules:

    -collective

    consumption

    of h is

    increased

    if

    the sum of the

    individual

    trade-off coefficients exceeds

    the substitution coefficient

    Oh

    =

    f

    Vf

    n;

    -the total

    available

    for individual

    consumption

    of h

    is

    increased

    if its

    price

    exceeds

    its substitution

    coefficient

    Oh

    (for h

    =

    r

    +

    1

    ... n

    -

    1);

    -the revision

    of

    the vector

    y

    is such that

    it

    remains

    on the

    production

    frontier;

    -the

    price

    of the

    private good

    h is increased

    if

    its

    aggregate demand

    exceeds the total

    available

    for

    consumption;

    -the

    revision

    of the indicator

    Ri

    concerning the income of

    consumer i

    is made of

    two parts: a compensation for the simultaneous

    revision of

    prices

    and collective

    consumptions,

    a

    participation

    to the social

    surplus

    that

    appears

    as a

    result of the

    exchange

    of information.

    The rule

    for the

    revision

    of individual incomes

    has been chosen

    in

    such

    a

    way

    that all consumers

    share the burden of

    improving

    the

    feasibility

    of the

    'program

    and that all

    simultaneously

    benefit from the

    improvement

    brought

    to the

    plan.

    The

    procedure

    is therefore neutral with

    respect

    to

    equity.

    Moreover,

    without

    any

    restrictive

    assumption

    on the differentiable

    utility

    functions

    Ui,

    it

    may

    be

    shown

    that,

    if

    the

    procedure operates continuously,

    it

    converges locally

    to an

    optimum plan.

    This content downloaded from 193.205.30.1 on Wed, 01 Jul 2015 08:50:27 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 7/25/2019 Christensen 71

    6/17

    DUALITY IN

    THE THEORY OF PRODUCTION 255

    ConjugateDuality and the

    TranscendentalLogarithmicFunction,

    Laurits

    R.

    Christensen, University of Wisconsin;

    Dale W. Jorgenson, Harvard

    University;

    Lawrence J. Lau, Stanford

    University

    This

    paper

    considers the transcendental

    logarithmic functional

    form,

    which

    provides a valid second order

    approximation

    to an arbitrary functional form.

    In

    particular, the

    C.E.S. and the Cobb-Douglas

    functions, as

    well as other lesser

    known varieties,

    are special cases

    of the Trans-Log function.

    In

    our

    application we consider

    both the trancendental

    logarithmic trans-

    formation function and the transcendental

    logarithmic

    profit function under

    the

    assumption

    of constant returns to scale. Two

    outputs, consumption and

    invest-

    ment,

    and two

    inputs, capital

    and labor, are distinguished in the

    empirical

    analysis.

    The Trans-Log transformation function is approximated by

    lnF

    =

    xo

    +

    aIlnI

    +

    cxclnC

    +

    3KIlnK

    +

    ILlnL+?cAlnA

    + AA(l A)2 + 7''(lI)2 + 2C(l C)2

    +

    y(IlnIlnC

    ?

    InlnIlnA + yCAlnClnA

    +

    8KK(ln

    K)2

    +

    'ILL

    (ln

    L)2 +

    fKL

    ln K ln L +

    EKA

    n K ln A2 2

    +

    ELA

    n L ln A +

    bIK In

    I

    ln

    K

    +

    6IL

    ln

    I

    ln L

    +

    ClnKClnC

    K

    +

    6CLlnCInL=

    0.

    where

    I

    =

    quantity

    of investment

    C

    =

    quantity

    of

    consumption

    K

    =

    quantity

    of capital

    L

    =

    quantity

    of labor

    A

    =

    productivity

    index

    which under

    the

    assumption

    of

    profit

    maximization

    lead to

    marginal productivity

    conditions

    of the

    type

    alnF

    p,I

    a

    ln

    I

    PKK

    -alnF

    a

    n

    K

    ac l

    y11

    In

    +

    ycn

    C+

    bIK

    inK

    +

    6ILln

    L+

    YIAln

    A

    -(K

    +

    bIK

    nI + 6CKlnC + eKK

    in

    K + EKLlnL+

    8KAIn

    A

    This content downloaded from 193.205.30.1 on Wed, 01 Jul 2015 08:50:27 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 7/25/2019 Christensen 71

    7/17

    256

    SECOND

    WORLD

    CONGRESS

    Similarly,

    the

    Trans-Log

    profit function is approximated by

    ln(Xi

    +

    1)

    - o0o

    +

    oxilnpI

    +

    iCclnPc

    +

    )BKlnPK

    +

    ILlnPL

    +

    (XAlnA

    +

    7AA(ln A)2

    +

    2(ln

    P)2

    +

    VC

    (ln

    pC)2

    +

    yIc

    ln

    pIln

    pC

    2 2

    '

    2

    +

    VIA

    In

    p,

    In A

    +

    CA

    InpcInA

    +

    KK

    (ln

    PK

    2

    +

    LL

    (In

    PL)2

    2

    2

    +

    8KLin

    PK

    ln

    PL

    + ?KA

    In

    PK

    lnA

    + rLAln

    PL

    ln

    A

    +

    aIKIlnpIln PK

    +

    6IL

    ln

    pIln

    PL

    +

    6CK

    in

    Pc

    In

    PK

    +

    5CL

    In

    Pc

    In

    PL

    =

    0

    where

    PI

    =

    price

    of investment

    Pc

    =

    price

    of

    consumption

    PK

    =

    price

    of

    capital

    PL

    =

    price

    of labor.

    By

    the Shephard-Uzawa-McFadden Lemma,

    the

    optimal output supply

    and

    input

    demand

    functions

    are

    given

    by equations

    of

    the

    type

    D

    In

    7t

    (2

    PI, a

    In

    PI

    P2

    __Dnp

    PKK

    -mInt

    a

    In PK

    cx1

    +

    yII

    In

    PI

    +

    VIc

    In

    Pc

    +

    6IK

    In

    PK

    +

    6IL

    In

    PL

    +

    VIA

    n

    A

    -

    (J3K

    +

    6IK ln pI

    +

    6CKln pC

    +

    eKK

    ln

    PK

    +

    EKL n

    PL

    + EKA n A)

    Equations (1)

    and

    (2) form

    the

    basis of the

    empirical

    analysis.

    The

    data

    used

    are

    the

    aggregate

    U.S. annual time

    series

    data

    developed by Christensen and

    Jorgenson.

    Because

    in the aggregate

    the prices

    and quantities

    of outputs and inputs

    influence

    one another,

    an

    econometric

    model is

    specified so that appropriate

    instrumental

    variables may

    be

    employed

    to obtain

    consistent

    estimates.

    Various

    economic

    hypotheses

    such as

    symmetry

    and

    homogeneity

    as

    well as hypotheses

    on

    specific

    functional

    forms are formulated

    and

    tested.

    It is found

    that

    while the

    restrictions imposed

    by economic

    theory

    are

    true,

    the

    restrictions

    imposed by the

    specific

    functional forms are

    false.

    This suggests

    that the

    Trans-Log

    function

    should

    be employed

    in the

    absence

    of correct

    a priori

    information

    on the specific

    functional

    form.

    This content downloaded from 193.205.30.1 on Wed, 01 Jul 2015 08:50:27 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 7/25/2019 Christensen 71

    8/17

    EMPLOYMENT

    AND WAGES

    257

    Relative Labor Employment

    in Manufacturing

    Industries, A. A. Cook, Jr.,

    The

    Rand Corporation

    Over the past two decades manufacturing

    output has increased

    significantly

    with virtually

    no increase

    in

    the employment

    of production

    labor. During the

    same period, the employment

    of non-production

    labor and capital has increased

    substantially.

    In

    this paper

    we test the hypothesis that the

    increase

    in

    the employ-

    ment of non-production

    labor relative to production

    labor is

    due to the greater

    complementarity

    of

    non-production

    labor with capital.

    The model

    includes a three factor production

    function: capital,

    non-produc-

    tion

    labor,

    and

    production

    labor.

    The production function possesses non-constant elasticities of substitution.

    However, the

    ratio of any two

    pairwise partial elasticities of substitution

    is constant

    and expressible wholly

    in terms of the

    parameters

    of the production function.

    Hence, estimation of

    the

    parameters

    provides

    a test for differing complementarity

    between pairs

    of factors.

    The estimation is essentially

    a two-stage process in which

    the three employ-

    ment

    demand equations

    are estimated simultaneously

    and then these parameter

    estimates

    are

    used

    in

    estimating the production function

    and the remaining

    parameters. The data consists

    of quarterly time

    series observations for fourteen

    two digit (SIC) manufacturing industries.

    The

    results support the

    hypothesis that

    non-production labor and capital

    are more

    complementary than

    production labor and capital.

    An

    Example

    Comparing Bayesian Analogues

    of Full and

    Limited

    Information

    Maximum

    Likelihood

    Estimators,

    Gordon M. Kaufman and Abba

    Krieger,

    Massachusetts

    Institute

    of

    Technology

    We consider the usual structural

    equation system

    By(i)

    +

    rz(i)

    =

    u(i),

    with

    {

    (i)j}

    a

    sequence

    of

    mutually independent

    random

    variables,

    identically

    normal

    with

    mean zero and

    variance matrix

    E. In addition to time series data

    {(y(i),z(j))}

    we

    have available

    cross-section data

    on

    individual

    rows of

    (B F).

    Given

    that

    the

    cross-section data for

    row i is

    generated by

    an

    independent

    normal

    process

    with

    variance

    proportional

    to

    aii,

    the iith element

    of

    E,

    we

    find the exact

    posterior

    density

    for

    (Br)

    unconditional

    as

    regards

    i

    when

    E is

    (2

    x

    2),

    and when

    the

    prior

    assigned

    to

    (B, F, i)

    is

    natural

    conjugate,

    Jeffery's-like,

    or some

    simple

    variant.

    A

    functional equation (necessary

    condition)

    for

    (B*F*)

    to be

    a

    posterior

    model

    value

    is

    derived.

    The

    posterior

    density

    of

    B

    unconditional

    as

    regards

    both

    r

    and

    E is

    also

    given.

    Properties

    of

    the

    posterior

    density

    of

    (BI')

    when

    the cross-section data

    is

    independent

    of

    the time-series data are outlined.

    Comparisons

    with

    a

    Bayesian analogue

    of

    LIMLE

    are made.

    This content downloaded from 193.205.30.1 on Wed, 01 Jul 2015 08:50:27 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 7/25/2019 Christensen 71

    9/17

    258

    SECOND WORLD CONGRESS

    The Autonomous

    Functioning of an Economic System, Janos

    Kornai and Bela

    Martos, HungarianAcademy

    of

    Sciences

    Analyzing hewayaneconomicsystem afirmas well as a nationaleconomy)

    works,

    a

    distinction

    can

    be madebetween ts autonomousand higher unctioning.

    This

    bears analogy

    to

    the

    working

    of

    the

    autonomousand the

    higher nervous

    system

    n

    living

    organisms,

    hence the

    terminologyadapted.

    The main

    features

    of

    the autonomousfunctioning

    of

    the

    economic

    system

    are:

    1.

    The

    simplicity

    of

    the information

    required

    for

    making

    decisions. The

    relativeunimportance

    f

    price-type

    nformation.

    2.

    The

    simplebehavioral

    rules

    which

    rely mostly

    on

    habits.

    This

    excludes

    fundamental

    hanges

    n

    technology

    as

    well

    as

    major

    nvestment

    decisions,

    which

    arecontrolledby the highercontrolsystem.Anotherpoint of view is a problem

    of restriction:

    he

    autonomous

    unctioning

    aims

    only

    at the survival

    of

    the

    system,

    which may

    include

    a

    stationaryextension,

    n an

    essentially

    unchanged

    environ-

    ment. Any other,

    more complexgoals appear

    n

    the highercontrol

    system.

    The

    autonomous

    functioning

    of different

    ystems

    seems

    to be

    very similar,

    while he higher unctioning

    s

    fairlydiversified

    wingto political,

    social,historical

    and

    otherconditions.It seems

    o be hard o

    separate

    he

    effects

    of the

    autonomous

    functioning

    n

    as

    much as

    they

    are

    always

    mixed

    up

    with the effects of higher

    functioning

    n

    any

    modern

    economy.

    No

    empirical

    videnceas to the

    viabilityof

    apureautonomous conomycan begiven.We mustrestrict urselves o theoretical

    reasoningvia simplified

    ormal models.

    As

    a firstapproximation

    f the

    problem

    a

    simplemodel for

    the Leontief-type

    economy

    will be demonstrated.

    Simple

    behavioral

    rules are

    applied,

    where

    relative

    changes

    n

    production

    and

    purchasequantitiesdepend

    only

    on

    changes

    in producers'

    and

    consumers'

    own

    stocks,

    sales and

    consumptionquantities,

    while

    pricesplay

    no role.

    The

    analysis

    of the models

    proves

    hat such an

    economy

    can

    survive

    even

    if

    minor outer disturbances ccur.

    The

    conclusion

    which

    can be drawn

    is

    that

    informationabout stocks

    may

    play a considerablepart in the control of any economicsystem,a much more

    important

    role than is

    usuallyacknowledged

    n

    the

    literature.

    Solution

    of Finite

    Two-person

    Games

    with

    Incomplete

    Information,

    W. Krelle and

    J. Burgermeister,

    niversity

    of Bonn

    The

    papersuggests

    a

    solution

    for

    finite

    non-cooperative wo-persongames

    with

    incomplete

    nformation.

    Either

    player

    belongs

    to a

    finitenumber

    of

    types

    which differ

    by

    their

    payoffs.

    Each

    player

    knows

    his

    own

    type

    but has

    only

    a

    subjectiveprobability

    distribution

    on

    the

    types

    of his

    opponent.

    These

    subjective

    probability

    distributions

    re

    known to both

    players.

    It will be

    shown

    n

    the

    paper

    that

    each

    player

    has a

    uniquely

    determined

    optimal

    counterstrategy

    o each

    strategy

    f his

    opponent.

    If

    there

    s

    to

    be

    an

    optimalstrategy

    or each

    player,

    hese

    strategies

    mustbe

    optimalagainst

    each

    other;

    that means

    hey

    must

    be

    equilibrium

    This content downloaded from 193.205.30.1 on Wed, 01 Jul 2015 08:50:27 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 7/25/2019 Christensen 71

    10/17

    OPTIMAL

    ECONOMIC GROWTH

    259

    strategies in the sense of

    Nash. It is demonstrated

    by an example that there are

    games without equilibrium

    strategies. In this case it is suggested that each player

    guesses the choice of strategy

    of his opponent by forming

    a subjective probability

    measureon the strategies of his opponent or (alternatively) by forming conditional

    subjective probabilities

    on the sequences of moves of his opponent.

    Un modele

    de

    croissance

    a

    deux variables de commande:

    arbitrage entre loisir et

    consommation, D. Lacaze

    and D. Badellon, Faculte des Sciences de Paris

    On aborde le

    probleme

    de l'arbitrage entre

    loisir et consommation par

    l'etude

    d'un modele de croissance

    global

    oiu

    a fonction d'utilite fair intervenir ces

    deux

    grandeurs.

    Ce modele

    comporte

    un minimum

    de consommation

    par

    tete

    variable dans le temps et une demande exogene (consommation

    des administrations

    et investissements non productifs). Le progres technique

    est

    exogene.

    Un

    probleme

    de controle

    optimal

    est

    ainsi

    defini, qui comprend

    une

    variable

    d'etat

    (le

    taux de

    capital)

    et deux

    variables de

    commande

    (le

    taux d'activite

    et

    le

    taux

    d'epargne net).

    Le

    principe du maximum permet

    de

    decrire

    avec

    precision

    les

    trajectoires optimales

    en fonction

    des

    conditions

    initiales et finales:

    capital

    initial, capital final et duree

    de la periode de developpement. On voit

    comment les

    valeurs respectives

    de l'utilite marginale de la consommation, de l'utilite marginale

    de

    loisir et

    du prix

    du capital gouvernent ces evolutions. On distingue ainsi dix

    regions correspondant

    a difftrents comportements

    economiques.

    Le modele a donne

    lieu

    a

    des applications

    numeriques.

    Pour cela, on a choise

    comme fonction economique

    une somme ponderee de logarithmes,

    ce

    qui

    revient

    a se donner l'elasticite

    entre

    loisir et consommation. Une

    methode

    originale

    de

    resolution s'inspirant des

    resultats de la discussion mathematique a ete mise au

    point.

    Les

    donnees numeriques

    ont

    ete

    empruntees

    aux

    etudes

    faites dans

    le

    cadre

    du

    Commissariat

    au

    Plan.

    On

    considere

    la

    famille

    d'evolutions

    optimales

    correspondant

    aux

    diverses

    valeurs

    possibles

    du

    capital

    final. L'une

    de

    ces evolutions est

    reguliere

    et conduit

    a des

    taux

    d'epargne

    et d'actualisation

    sensiblement constants

    apres

    un

    regime

    transitoire initial: C'est

    cette evolution

    qui

    sera retenue.

    On etudie

    egalement

    les

    variations

    de

    l'evolution

    optimale

    enfonction

    de

    l'importance

    accordee

    au loisir. Ces

    resultats

    conduisent

    a

    une valeur du

    capital

    final

    superieure

    a

    celle

    qui

    etait retenue

    jusque la,

    et

    'a des

    valeurs satisfaisantes

    des

    taux

    d'epargne

    et d'actualisation.

    On the

    Theory

    of Financial

    Intermediation,

    David H.

    Pyle, University

    of

    California,

    Berkeley

    The

    essential

    characteristic

    of a financial

    intermediary

    is that

    it

    issues claims

    on

    itself

    and uses

    the

    proceeds

    to

    purchase

    other

    financial

    assets.

    The

    principal

    question

    to

    which

    the

    analysis

    in

    this

    paper

    is

    addressed is: under

    what

    circum-

    This content downloaded from 193.205.30.1 on Wed, 01 Jul 2015 08:50:27 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 7/25/2019 Christensen 71

    11/17

    260

    SECOND

    WORLD

    CONGRESS

    stances

    would a firmbe

    willing

    o

    sell a

    given

    deposit

    iability

    and use the

    proceeds

    to

    purchase

    a

    given

    type

    of

    financialasset when

    the

    yields

    on

    both the

    asset and

    the

    liability

    are

    stochastic? The

    analysis

    deals

    with the

    portfolio

    problem

    in

    financialntermediaries hileabstractingromtheimportantproblems f liquidity

    and

    transactionsdemand.

    In Section

    II

    of

    thepaper,a

    three-security

    modelof

    financial

    ntermediation

    is

    presented. t is

    shown

    that a

    positiverisk

    premiumon

    loans

    and

    a

    negativerisk

    premium n

    depositsare

    sufficient,

    ut

    not

    necessary onditions or

    intermediation

    to take

    place.

    The

    principal

    esultsof this

    section are summarizedn

    terms

    of

    the

    properties f the

    joint

    distribution f loan

    and

    deposit

    yields

    which

    lead

    to inter-

    mediationwhenboth of

    these

    yields

    are

    greaterhan

    the

    yield

    on a

    riskless

    ecurity.

    By

    using

    a

    mean-variance

    reference

    unction,

    a

    specific

    example

    of

    the resultsof

    SectionII is presentedn Section III.

    Finally,

    the

    justification

    or a

    preference unction

    approach s

    discussed.

    In

    particular,

    the role of

    equilibrium

    capital

    asset

    prices

    in

    the

    intermediary's

    portfolio

    decision

    is

    examined.

    Producing,

    Storing,

    Transporting,

    ndUsing

    Knowledge, .

    Marschak,

    University

    of

    California,Los

    Angeles

    Thecosts anddelaysinvolved n storingandtransporting

    commodityare,

    by and

    large,

    independent

    of its

    prospective

    value

    in

    use

    and of

    its

    production

    cost.

    Similarly,

    he

    costs and

    delays

    in

    retaining

    and

    communicating

    knowledge

    are, by and

    large,

    ndependentof

    both its

    usefulness

    o the

    receiver

    value of

    information)

    and the

    cost

    of

    producing t

    (e.g., cost of

    collectingdata).

    This

    justifies he

    attempts

    o

    measure

    he

    volume

    of

    information. t

    would

    roughly

    correspond o the

    physical

    volume

    or

    weight

    of

    goods

    in

    warehouses nd

    n

    transit.

    Essentially,

    t should

    measure

    the number of

    symbols

    necessary

    to

    store and

    transmit

    a

    message.

    The

    larger

    a collectionof

    symbols,

    the

    larger

    he

    equipment

    or timeneededto handlethem.

    However

    to

    return

    o

    our

    analogy),

    the

    costs of

    storage

    and

    transportation

    of

    commodities

    is

    not

    completelyindependent

    of

    its value

    in

    use.

    The

    more

    valuable

    a

    commodity

    he

    greater

    will

    profit

    be affected

    by

    breakage

    or

    leakage,

    per pound

    or

    gallon.

    Similarly,

    ome distortions

    of

    messages

    reduce

    the

    benefit

    more than

    others.

    The

    code

    must

    be

    adjusted

    o a

    fidelity

    criterion.

    Entropy

    formulae

    (in bits

    of

    information)

    approximatethe

    expected

    number

    of

    necessary

    ymbols,

    presupposing fficient

    ncodingof

    events

    grouped

    into

    long

    sub-sequence

    blocks ).

    This

    is

    economically

    relevant

    only

    if

    events

    follow in

    quick

    succession,

    permittingus to

    neglect

    the

    delays

    and storage

    costs

    caused

    by

    waiting

    for

    the

    completion

    of

    each

    block.

    The

    analysis

    is

    carried

    by

    presenting

    a

    system(i.e.,

    network or

    chain)

    of

    processors,

    beginning

    with

    the

    processingof

    events

    nto

    data, and

    endingwith the

    processingof decoded

    messages

    nto decisions.

    Each

    processor

    s

    characterized

    by

    a

    transition

    matrix,

    a

    cost

    function, and a

    delay function.

    The

    assumption

    This content downloaded from 193.205.30.1 on Wed, 01 Jul 2015 08:50:27 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 7/25/2019 Christensen 71

    12/17

    INPUT-OUTPUT

    ANALYSIS

    I

    261

    (usual

    in

    statistical decision theory) of costless and

    instantaneous decision making

    need not be made.

    The user chooses the system maximizing

    the expected difference

    between benefit

    (a function of the

    sequence of events and decisions)

    and total

    cost-provided utility is additive in these components.

    Various Turnpike Models

    of the Japanese

    Economy-Including an Extension of

    Consumption

    Turnpike Theorem,

    Y.

    Murakami,

    K.

    Tokoyama,

    J.

    Tsukui,

    Econ-

    omic Planning Agency, Japan

    Following

    up Tsukui's pilot

    study

    in

    Econometrica, 1968,

    we have been

    trying

    to develop

    various

    dynamic

    input-output models

    for an indicative planning

    model of the Japanese economy; the models include technological substitution,

    technological progress

    and

    change

    in

    final demand

    patterns.

    In

    the course

    of

    our

    developmental

    efforts, we discovered

    some results of theoretical

    importance.

    Among them,

    we shall here present the following

    three results,

    which are all

    closely related

    to the so-called turnpike property

    (1)

    Consumption turnpike property

    does

    hold,

    in

    spite

    of a

    change

    in

    the

    discount

    rate associated with future consumption

    in

    a

    target

    function.

    (2) Our

    simulation suggests

    that a

    concept

    of turnpike may be extended

    to

    models including technological

    progress

    which may differ from industry

    to industry. Any efficientpaths starting from a given initial condition can

    be

    approximated

    to

    a certain

    locus

    during

    most

    of the

    planning periods.

    A

    turnpike locus is generally

    a curve but no longer a ray.

    (3)

    In

    order to compute a

    switching

    of a

    turnpike

    due to a change in final

    demand

    patterns,

    it is

    necessary

    to solve

    a

    special class of nonlinear

    programming

    problems.

    It

    can

    be

    shown,

    however, that such

    nonlinear

    programming

    problems can

    be solved as a

    particular

    kind of linear

    programming

    or its recursion.

    Computational

    results are

    shown to

    support

    each of the

    above

    three

    properties

    and related findings. As is well known, a meaning of the turnpike property in the

    theory

    of economic

    planning

    is that we can

    determine an

    optimal growth pattern

    almost

    independently

    of our choice

    of final

    state

    conditions

    and/or

    specification

    of

    target

    functions.

    Our results

    seem to warrant that

    turnpike property

    holds

    over a wide

    range

    of

    multi-sectoral

    growth

    models

    so that

    computation

    of a

    turnpike may

    be

    recommended

    as a reasonable approximation

    to

    any

    efficient

    growth path

    in

    any

    national

    economic

    planning.

    Prices,

    Information

    and Market

    Structure,

    Michael

    Rothschild,

    Harvard Univer-

    sity

    A

    commonplace

    of our

    experience

    is the

    variety

    and

    volatility

    of

    prices

    for

    consumer

    goods.

    This is

    in

    striking

    contrast

    to

    the

    premises

    and

    predictions

    of

    economic

    theory

    that

    in

    equilibrium

    markets

    sustain

    a

    single price

    for a

    single good.

    This content downloaded from 193.205.30.1 on Wed, 01 Jul 2015 08:50:27 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 7/25/2019 Christensen 71

    13/17

    262 SECOND

    WORLD

    CONGRESS

    The perversity of the real

    world is attributed to markets being out of

    equilibrium

    and to locational monopolies and the like which make

    economically different

    goods out

    of what

    laymen regard

    as

    identical products. This paper

    argues that

    it is not necessary to resort to such explanations. Rather, variable and varying

    prices

    are to be

    expected

    in

    a

    world

    where

    consumers have limited

    facilities

    for

    acquiring, storing

    and

    acting

    on

    information.

    Furthermore,

    it

    is

    doubtful that

    the

    mere

    existence

    of

    large

    numbers of

    competing

    sellers

    will

    prevent

    the

    exploita-

    tion of limitations of

    consumers'

    ability

    to

    do

    comparative shopping.

    Analysis

    of a model which

    incorporates

    these features of

    consumer

    behavior

    reveals

    that

    in

    such

    a world

    equilibrium,

    in

    the conventional sense of constant

    prices, may not

    exist

    if

    sellers compete

    with one

    another.

    For,

    in

    this

    model,

    prices

    must

    be

    equilibrium points

    of a

    non-cooperative game

    which

    may

    have no

    pure strategy equilibrium. When static equilibrium prices exist, this model gives

    us

    some reason to doubt

    that

    perfect competition

    will

    protect

    the

    imperfect

    consumer.

    In

    some cases this

    price

    may

    be

    calculated

    as a

    function of the number

    of sellers

    in

    the market.

    Although

    the

    equilibrium price

    falls as

    the number

    of

    competitors increases,

    it

    does not

    approach

    the

    competitive price

    as the number

    of

    stores becomes

    infinite.

    This

    paper

    builds

    on the work

    of

    Selten, Stigler,

    and

    Telser.

    Procedure

    to

    Determine

    a

    Programme

    in an

    Economy

    where

    only

    Collective

    Goods

    are

    Available,

    Pieter

    H.

    M.

    Ruys,

    Katholieke

    Hogeschool,

    Netherlands

    In

    an

    economy

    are

    n

    collective

    (or nonexchangeable) goods

    producible

    in

    various degrees

    of

    availability.

    The m

    individual

    agents together

    have

    to.make

    a

    decision

    concerning

    the

    (relative) availability

    of the collective

    goods,

    which

    affects an

    agent

    as

    a

    consumer

    (e.g.

    health

    service, transportation

    facilities)

    and

    as

    a

    producer (e.g.

    hours

    working, job appointments). Every agent

    is

    supposed

    to

    partake

    of the collective

    goods

    vector without

    being

    able

    to

    obtain

    anything

    through exchange

    between

    individuals.

    A

    procedure can be

    developed that

    determines

    a

    combination

    of

    quantities

    of

    collective

    goods,

    such

    that

    any change

    in

    quantity causes a

    disequilibrium between social benefit (a function of individual

    utilities)

    and social cost

    (a

    function of

    individual

    disutilities).

    Given a vector

    of

    goods (x), every agent

    determines

    the direction of

    the relative

    changes

    in

    the

    proposed

    vector

    (p)

    in

    which his

    utility

    will

    be

    maximized. Normal-

    ized

    to

    an

    individual

    income or

    influence-constraint (px