–Chris Holmes

37
–Chris Holmes Geospatial Collaboration: Working together spatially at Internet Scale

description

Geospatial Collaboration: Working together spatially at Internet Scale. –Chris Holmes. Internet Scale?. “Architectures of Participation”. – Coined by Tim O’Reilly. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of –Chris Holmes

Page 1: –Chris Holmes

–Chris Holmes

Geospatial Collaboration:

Working together spatially at Internet Scale

Page 2: –Chris Holmes

Internet Scale?

Page 3: –Chris Holmes

“Architectures of Participation”

– Coined by Tim O’Reilly

Page 4: –Chris Holmes
Page 5: –Chris Holmes

An “Architecture of Participation” is both social and technical, leveraging the skills and energy of users as

much as possible to cooperate in building

something bigger than any single person or organization

could alone.

Page 6: –Chris Holmes

Architectures of Participation

Software: The first domain to see benefits

The process can be applied to other fields

Page 7: –Chris Holmes
Page 8: –Chris Holmes

Geospatial?

Page 9: –Chris Holmes

Collaboration EvolutionOpen Source Software vs Geospatial

Page 10: –Chris Holmes

True Believers

Page 11: –Chris Holmes

Acceleration

Page 12: –Chris Holmes

Company Involvement

Page 13: –Chris Holmes

Explosion

Page 14: –Chris Holmes

Maturity

Page 15: –Chris Holmes

Geospatial Collaboration Status

On the verge of explosion

Page 16: –Chris Holmes

Geospatial Data

Creation Sharing

Page 17: –Chris Holmes

Sharing Layers

Page 18: –Chris Holmes

OpenStreetMap

Geo Data Creation:

MapShare™

Page 19: –Chris Holmes

Current Issues in Geospatial Collaboration The ‘gotchas’

Page 20: –Chris Holmes

Current Issues:

Licensing?

vs ODbL

Page 21: –Chris Holmes

Current Issues:

The ‘open’ seduction

vs

http://brainoff.com for more info

Page 22: –Chris Holmes

Current Issues:

Community monoculture

vs

or ?

Page 23: –Chris Holmes

Current Issues:

Raster Collaboration

vs

?

?

?

?

?

Page 24: –Chris Holmes

Current Issues:

Tool Bifurcation

vsPotlatch

VS

Page 25: –Chris Holmes

The FutureSteps towards Geospatial Collaboration Maturity

Page 26: –Chris Holmes

Towards Maturity:

Licensing

• Flesh out a range of licenses for geospatial data

• From MIT style to GPL style

• Form a foundation to promote, educate and market

• Could be pushing/funding Open Data Commons

• Establish more norms around the licensing edge cases

Page 27: –Chris Holmes

Towards Maturity:

Workflow

vs

Page 28: –Chris Holmes

Towards Maturity:

Scope

vs

Page 29: –Chris Holmes

Towards Maturity:

OpenAerialMap!

vs

Page 30: –Chris Holmes

Towards Maturity:

Geospatial Patch

vs

• Format that encapsulates an ‘edit’ on any system that can be reviewed by a human

• Interoperable between different editing systems

• OSM, MapMaker, OpenGeo, ESRI

• Easy visualizations and conflict resolution

Page 31: –Chris Holmes

Towards Maturity:

Collaboration Hubs

vs

• Logical extension of GeoCommons, ArcGIS.com, GeoNode, WorldMap

• But interoperable with one another

• But not just styling, but also handle editing and versioned editing

• Community tools like issue trackers, mailing lists, etc.

• Github/sourceforge for geospatial

Page 32: –Chris Holmes

Towards Maturity:

Tools• Editing tools that are accessible and also good enough for experts

• Advanced workflow management

Sandboxes, approval before acceptance

Automatic validation (topology, required fields)

Branches and merging with Conflict Resolution

Automatic change notification email / rss

• Integrated metadata, automatic tracking of all inputs and outputs

Page 33: –Chris Holmes

• Hosted Services

Geocoding, Route finding, Custom Tiles

• Guarantee of accuracy / indemnity

• Enable private collaboration around additional layers, like github (open is free, private is paid)

• Value add packaging - formats, documentation, software

• Subscription to latest updates

• On demand custom gathering of data, but in to an open collaborative map

Towards Maturity:

Open Geospatial Business Models

Page 34: –Chris Holmes

Towards Maturity:

Government role

• Step back from collecting all data

• Encourage citizens and agency collaboration around common base maps

• Perform Quality Assurance and gathering of data where there is none

• Provide stamp of ‘authoritative’ data that can be trusted

Page 35: –Chris Holmes

Towards Maturity:

Cooperation

• Align efforts so that amateur, commercial, NGO and governmental creators all naturally collaborate

• Figure out workflows, tools and licenses that work for everyone

• Interoperability between various efforts, though diverse communities make a healthy ecosystem

• Towards living data, constantly evolving - authoritative and always up to date

Page 36: –Chris Holmes

My Geospatial Collaboration Goal

Let’s build a Geospatial Web that’s so compelling and easy-to-use that

everyone: Citizens, Governments, NGO’s and Companies all naturally

collaborate towards the same infrastructure for public good.

Page 37: –Chris Holmes

Thank you

These slides are available at http://presentations.opengeo.org/2011_Harvard

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Share Alike Attribution License. Please attribute Chris Holmes, and keep the OpenGeo.org logo on all slides, unless alternate permission is given. Contact [email protected] for more information