Chev Chea, Poster Presentation
-
Upload
university-of-agriculture -
Category
Education
-
view
176 -
download
2
Transcript of Chev Chea, Poster Presentation
Economic Land Concession
and Its Impact on Local Livelihoods in Kampong Speu Province
Chea Chev1, Mom Seng
1 and Jean-Christophe Diepart
2
1Graduate School, Royal University of Agriculture
2Department of Economics and Rural Development, University Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Gembloux, Belgium
Over 80%, of the more than 10 million Cambodian currently living in rural
area, depend on land and natural resources to support their livelihoods.
Most are subsistent, relying on one crop (that is rice) every year, with fish
and other aquatic resources, and a range of forest products.
Development of private enterprise in form of Land Concessions granted to
forestry/agro-business has been suggested as a means of development and
poverty reduction in rural Cambodia. However; conflicts over land and nat-
ural resources are becoming a very topical issue in Cambodia. Around 25%
of the population do not have land for agriculture and this, according to the
NGO Forum’s report, is increasing by around 2% every year due to large
concession.
Sustainable livelihoods as a
conceptual framework of analy-
sis were reviewed which sup-
ported the implementation of
the research results.
A total of sixty-six (66) house-
holds were interviewed and oth-
er qualitative methods consist of
village resources maps, transect
walks, time lines, seasonal cal-
endar, observations and groups
discussions were also applied to
understand five livelihood as-
sets, coping strategies, history
changes and resources map in
the area.
Introduction
Methodology
Table 1 The basis of local livelihood situation
Results
Conclusion
Objectives: To examine the necessary economic and social impacts of ELC
development on local people’s livelihoods and to identify ad-
aptation strategies.
The concession has contributed to the loss of access to the land and natural resources which are heavily dependent upon by the rural communities. Nevertheless an
increasing number of ELCs are continued to be granted, further limiting rural communities’ access to land. Meanwhile very low number of the local workforce are
employed on the plantation. There is also poor communication and consultation with local communities, if any at all, it is very minimal with most decisions regard-
ing the concession taken at the central government level leaving the local authorities powerless.
In conclusion, in the case of study area, the ELC development model granted has proven not to be an effective way of promoting development that benefits the ma-
jority of Cambodia’s population. Instead it end up enriching a few and serving the interest of small group and foreign business: whiles compromising the livelihoods
and survival of rural Cambodian communities.
Abstract: The results indicated that the ELC development in case of Choam Sankae commune has hugely negative impacts resulting in the loss of access to land and
natural resources which are the primary assets for the entire means of the local livelihoods, 29.62% are landless household whiles 36.67% hold less than 0.5 ha per
household and most of the respondents have more difficulty to find firewood because of company protection. The purpose of ELC is to develop intensive agriculture
and agro-industry. By the end of the study period; only an estimated 2-3% of total granted lands have been planting and 1.33% of local eligible labour-force have been
employed. The lack of skills and formal training is preventing them from getting opportunities to adjust to the rapid changes. An estimated 62.5% of households have
migrated for jobs with higher risks and low income. In conclusion, local people were not well-prepared for the land transformation; an issue that should be taken into
consideration on policy discussion on the role and strategy of land concession if it is to make any significant contribution to pro-poor development.
Description Unit Phnom Cheas
village
Doun Proung
village
Total sample
selection
Average member per HH Per 5.14 5.35 5.25
Age active labor (18-60) % 67.10 64.23 65.67
Average land size per HH Ha 0.78 0.86 0.82
Average land per active labor Ha 0.335 0.308 0.32
Landlessness % 24.70 35.00 29.85
Accessing to credit ability % 24.00 35.00 29.50
Saving group formation % 0.00 27.03 13.52
Migration ability % 55.20 64.90 60.05
Cattle production (3-6 heads) % 58.00 54.00 56.00
Paddy
land size
Cow
number
Migration
number HH size
Paddy land size Pearson Correlation 1 .463(**) -.422(**) .248(*)
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .045
N 66 66 66 66
Cow number Pearson Correlation .463(**) 1 -.323(**) .322(**)
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .008 .008
N 66 66 66 66
Migration Number Pearson Correlation -.422(**) -.323(**) 1 .038
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .008 .762
N 66 66 66 66
Household size Pearson Correlation .248(*) .322(**) .038 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .045 .008 .762
N 66 66 66 66
Table 2 Correlations between land and other factors
Figure 1 Percentage of local active HH labors work on plantation
Figure 2 Negative impacts of ELC based on farming system analysis
Note: Direct impact
Indirect impact
HH Household
Nearly 70% holding
HHs may complete-
ly lose access to
land for agriculture
Lost of grazing land
6 cases of displace-
ment were forced
without compensation
Loss of access to NTFPs
for daily use
High number of la-
bor migration