CHEP 97 Berlin, April 97Frédéric Hemmer1/11 Managing Outsourcing Contracts for System...
-
Upload
octavia-french -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of CHEP 97 Berlin, April 97Frédéric Hemmer1/11 Managing Outsourcing Contracts for System...
CHEP 97 Berlin, April 97 Frédéric Hemmer 1/11
Managing Outsourcing Contracts for System Administration
Frédéric Hemmer
CERN
CHEP 97 Berlin, April 97 Frédéric Hemmer 2/11
Capacity explosion
Physics Data Processing capacity Benefits
Cheaper and more affordable computing cycles
Large data stores Services dedicated to experiments
Large increase of computer nodes (20 in 1990, 300 now)
Over 1000 disks need for more manpower to perform
the system administration
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
(est
.)
Year
CP
U C
ap
ac
ity
- C
ER
N U
nit
s
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
Dis
k S
tora
ge
- G
iga
By
tes
CHEP 97 Berlin, April 97 Frédéric Hemmer 3/11
Manpower evolution
Physics Data Processing manpower system administration user support general administration planning etc.
Total decreased by 25 % Sys. Admin. decreased by 40 %
5
10
15
20
25
30
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
(es
t.)
Year
ma
n-y
ea
rs p
er
ye
ar
Total Systems Administration
CHEP 97 Berlin, April 97 Frédéric Hemmer 4/11
Outsourcing Very wide definition
Total outsourcing of a service Total transfer of ownership (equipment, infrastructure and staff) Long term mega-deals Temporary labour contracts Selective sourcing (scope, size and duration)
different activities lead to different management attention create constant competition more flexibility to adapt to changes
We try to follow this approach
CHEP 97 Berlin, April 97 Frédéric Hemmer 5/11
“Best Practices in Information Technology Sourcing”
M.C. Lacity, L.P. Wilcocks
Executive Research Briefing, Oxford Institute of Information Management, Templeton College,
University of Oxford1996
CHEP 97 Berlin, April 97 Frédéric Hemmer 6/11
Our approach
Short term contracts System administration only CERN retains planning, HW
purchase/maintenance, user support, choice of technology and architecture
SLA’s defining quality measures At least two contracts (offset in time)
allows for regular retendering (competition)
CHEP 97 Berlin, April 97 Frédéric Hemmer 7/11
Our experience (1)
Initially tried to use temporary labour Difficulty in finding experience candidates CERN policy evolved to service contracts
Difficulty to express specifications of sys. admin. Outsourced the task of writing the specifications Long iterative process Vendor and customer have different goals ! Contract covering 28 HP and 27 DEC starting Jan. 96
CHEP 97 Berlin, April 97 Frédéric Hemmer 8/11
Our experience (2)
Documents Service Definition Document (Scope, communication and escalation
procedures) Service Level Agreement (responsibilities, tasks and performance metrics) Specific Sys. Admin. documents for each system
System Administration tasks installation, configuration changes, reactive and proactive problem
management, development of service quality and performance measurements Aggressive timescale
2 months for sys. admin. guides, take over one month later
CHEP 97 Berlin, April 97 Frédéric Hemmer 9/11
Our experience (3) May review
Objectives met No degradation in service Documentation very good Improvements needed
Communication needs to be more formal Mastersoft’s OSM
• Inventory, SLA, communication, reporting, quality measurement System managers showed reluctance to give away “their” systems
(lack of confidence, faster to fix it now). Not solved yet. Decided to expand
24/hours day later expand to all DEC, HP, SUN and SGI equipment
CHEP 97 Berlin, April 97 Frédéric Hemmer 10/11
Potential Problem areas Call Management System
Installed in Autumn, not used before March• No PC for our OPS manager• Lack of momentum in contract follow-up (increased
responsibilities of the team leader, staffing problems)
no quality or performance measures Coverage and end of 96 shutdown
Contract excluded this period Period of intense activity as the computers are down
return of control to CERN staff Contractor’s staff stability
unable to test whether procedures and documentation are enough
CHEP 97 Berlin, April 97 Frédéric Hemmer 11/11
Conclusions Globally positive
Procedures well documented Very few problems/mistakes Not too many delays Clear cost attributable to system administration Scaling up no longer limited by CERN staffing level
Improvement needed More involvement from CERN needed in contract follow-up The performance metrics need to be gathered and analysed
We hope to assess performance by the summer and be ready for tendering at the end of the year.