CHENCHURI BEEL SUB-PROJECT AREAsouthwest.bwdb.gov.bd/files/report/8001ed4fd0013f... · define the...
Transcript of CHENCHURI BEEL SUB-PROJECT AREAsouthwest.bwdb.gov.bd/files/report/8001ed4fd0013f... · define the...
JUNE 2011
DHV, The Netherlands
In association with DevCon Bangladesh Kranti Bangladesh DPM Bangladesh
Institutional Strengthening and Project Management
Technical Report No. 30
Subunit implementation plan SWC-17+18; NOAGRAM-GAZARIA
CHENCHURI BEEL SUB-PROJECT AREA ADB Loan 2200-BAN(SF) / GON Grant 0036 BAN
SOUTHWEST AREAIntegrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project
Bangladesh Water Development Board
SOUTHWEST AREAIntegrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project
Bangladesh Water Development Board
SSWRDSP Small Scale Water Resources Development Sector Project
SWAIWRMP South West Area Integrated Water Resource Management Project
TL Team Leader
TNA Training Need Assessment
UNO Upazila Nirbahi Officer
UP Union Parishad
UNDP United Nations Development Programme
WMCA Water Management Cooperative Association
WMG Water Management Group
WMO Water Management Organization
WMF Water Management Federation
WRMF Water Recourse Management Families
XEN Executive Engineer (BWDB or LGED)
GLOSSARY Beel Low-lying depression on the floodplain that generally retains
water throughout the year Baor Water body similar to an ox bow lake Jalmahal Water bodies leased only by Government – a “water estate” Khal Canal Kharif Summer season or summer crop Rabi Winter season or winter crop Union Parishad Lowest level of administrative organization
Acronyms and Abbreviations ADB Asian Development Bank
BRAC Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee
BRDB Bangladesh Rural Development Board
BWDB Bangladesh Water Development Board
CDSP Char1 Development and Settlement Project of BWDB
DAE Department of Agricultural Extension
DWA Department of Women Affairs
XEN Executive Engineer (BWDB or LGED)
FAP Flood Action Plan
FCD Flood Control and Drainage
FCDI Flood Control, Drainage and Irrigation
DFID Department for International Development
GB Grameen Bank
BISCIC Bangladesh Small and Cottage Industries Corporation
GOB Government of Bangladesh
GPWM Guideline for Participatory Water Management
IGA Income Generating Activities
IWMP Integrated Water Management Implementation Plan
LEP Livelihood Enhancement Perspectives
LGED Local Government Engineering Department
MPE Marketing Promotional Enterprises
MOWR Ministry of Water Resources
NGO Non Government Organization
NWP National Water Policy
NWMP National Water Management Plan
PMO Project Management Office
PPTA Project Preparatory Technical Assistance
PRRA Participatory Rapid Rural Appraisal
PRS Poverty Reduction Strategy
RF Resettlement Framework
RP Resettlement Plan
RRP Report and Recommendations of the President to the Board of Directors, ADB
SIP Sub-unit Implementation Plan
SMO Sub-project Management Office
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project BWDB
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Page - i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………………….………1
2.0 PROJECT HISTORY ……………………………………………………………………1-4
3.0 SUB PROJECT OVERVIEW ………………..…………………………………………..4-5
3.1 SIP Formulation …………………………………………………………………………………4
3.2 Location ………...……………………………………………………………………………….4
3.3 Topographic Data ……………………………………………………………………………….4
3.4 Climate …………………………………………………………………………………………..5
3.5 Communications / Road …………………………………………………………………………5
4.0 IMPACT ASSESSMENT ………………………………………….………………...……5-14
4.1 Proposed Interventions ……………………………..…………..……………….……….............5
4.2 Land Types………………….…………..…………………………….……….…………………6
4.3 Hydrologic Characteristics…………………………………………………………..…...........6-7
4.4 Agriculture…………………………………………………………………….………………...7
4.5 Fisheries…….……………………………………………………………….…………..…....10
4.6 Environment …………………………………………………..……………………..……….10
4.7 Surface Water……..…………………………………………..……………………..……….10
4.8 Socio Economy ……………………………………………….………………………….11-14
4.8.1 Stakeholders ………………………………………..…………………………..….11
4.8.2 Peoples Participation ……………………………………….…………………..…11
4.8.3 Training ……………………………………………………………………..………13
4.8.4 Gender and Livelihood ………………………………………..……………..……13
4.8.5 Collective Action Plan (CAP)………………………………………………….13-14
5.0 O & M ISSUES ……………………….………………………..……….……..………..14-15
6.0 FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS……….…………….…….15
7.0 MULTI - CRITERIA ANALYSIS ………………………………….……...…………….…16
8.0 TABLES ……………………………………………………………………....……..….17-30
Table - 1 : Land type analysis ……………………………………………………….……………..17
Table - 2 : Land use changes ……………………………………………………………………....18
Table - 3 : Household farm size distribution and occupation distribution ……….….…..……...19
Table - 4 : Production by land type impacts on SIP Agriculture ………………….…….……….20
Table - 5 : Total, Cereal and high value crop production Impacts on project area.......……… 21
Table -6 : Financial and Economic Impacts on SIP Agriculture ……………….…….………….22
Table -7 : Financial and Economic Impacts on SIP Fisheries ……………..……………..…… 23
Table - 8 : Cost Estimates of Proposed Works ………………………………..….………………24
Table - 9 :Annual O & M Cost ………………………………………………………………………24
Table -10: Crop Production Summary ……………………………………………………….…….25
Table -11: Fish Production Summary ……………………………………………………….……..25
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project BWDB
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Page - ii
Table -12: Economic Sensitivity ……………………………………………………………..……..25
Table -13: Financial Cash Flow ……………………………………………..…………….…..…...26
Table -14: Economic Cash Flow …………………………………………………...…..….……….27
Table -15: Multi-Criteria Analysis ……………………………………………………………..…....28
Table -16: Elevation, Area & Storage on SIP Area ………………………………..……..………29
Table -17 : Observed data river water salinity impact…….…………………...……………....…30
9.0 CHARTS ………………………………………………………………………………...18-30
Chart - 1 : Land use changes ……………………………………………………….………...18
Chart - 2 : Farm size distribution …………………………………...…………….………….19
Chart - 3 : Occupational distribution of households ………………………………..………..19
Chart - 4 : Total, Cereal and high value crop production Impacts on project area……………21
Chart - 5 : Potential open water fish production gross impacts ………………………..…….23
Chart - 6 : Area-Elevation-Storage Curve ………………………………………..…………..29
Chart -7 : Observed data river water salinity impact curve.………………………..…………30
10.0 FIGURES
Figure – 1: Chenchuri beel Sub Project Map……………………………….…..……………..2
Figure – 2: SWC-16 Map……………………………………………..……………...………….3
Figure – 3: Crop Calendar……………………………………………………….……………8-9
Figure – 4: SWC-16 WMG Map…………………………………….……………..…………..12
11.0 ANNEXES
Annex-A: Agriculture
Annex-B: Fisheries
Annex-C: Environment
Annex-D: Socio Economy, Gender and Livelihood
Annex-E: Water Management Organization (WMO)
Annex-F: O & M
Annex-G: Hydrology
Annex-H: Training
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 1
SWC-17+18, Noagram-Gazaria Scheme
1. INTRODUCTION Chenchuri Beel Sub-project (SP), located in Narail, Lohagora and Kalia Upazila of Narail District is bounded by the Chitra River to the west and the Nabagonga River to the north,east and south. Covering a gross area of about 25,560 ha and net area of about 17,900 ha. In the north-west corner of the sub-project there exists a pumped irrigation scheme of about 1,100 ha implemented by BWDB. Two inclined irrigation pumps one at Kamapur and the other at Gandarbakhali are there in the scheme with a capacity of about 0.60 cumec each to draw water from the Chitra river. The pre-feasibility study of the SP was done in 1993 under FAP-4, South-west Area Water Resources Management Project. The study proposed compartmentalization as water management strategies. During feasibility study of the SP under Feasibility Study of South-West Area Water Resources Development Project in 1998, it was felt that integrated development of agriculture, Fisheries and navigation are needed as per desire of the people of the SP area. These objectives can be met through engineering works including rehabilitation and limited construction of embankment, improvement of irrigation and drainage channels, bank protection works and rehabilitation and limited construction of structures. To reduce poverty through increasing food production and creating employment generation South-west Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project (SAIWRPMP) has been taken up by BWDB in 2005, where people’s participation shall be ensured in planning, design, implementation, monitoring and O&M of the project. The total area under the project (SAIWRPMP) covers an area of 100,000 ha. Two sub-projects (i) Chenchuri Beel sub-project and (ii) Narail sub-project covering 57,000 ha of land has been taken up for immediate implementation. This was prepared through a Project Preparatory Technical Assistance (PPTA). The rest 43,000 ha area of the project will be implemented after feasibility studies from amongst 11 Nos candidate sub-projects preliminary identified in the PPTA study. Considering the hydrological boundary, the Chenchuri Beel Sub-Project has been divided in to 18 Nos Sub-unit Implementation Plan (SIP) ( Figure-1) for better Operation and Maintenance of the Sub-Project SWC-17+18 ( Figure-2) is within Chenchuri Beel sub-project, having a gross area of about 1301 ha and net cultivable area of about 911 ha ( 70% of gross area ). 2. PROJECT HISTORY
Following the consecutive disastrous floods of 1987 and 1988, the Government of
Bangladesh initiated a five-year study programme namely Flood Action Plan (FAP)
comprising 26 components that included five regional studies.The South West Area Water
Resources Management Project (SWAWRMP) was one of the regional studies, namely FAP-
4, carried out at pre-feasibility level between 1991 and 1993 with ADB and UNDP assistance.
The study identified 30 sub-projects (SP) and prioritized them in terms of need,
implementation period, rate of return and social and environmental impacts. As a result of the
analysis, seven SPs covering about 250,000 ha, were recommended for carrying forward to
feasibility level study and detailed design. The recommendation included the Narail and the
Chenchuri Beel sub-projects.
Subsequently, the South West Area Water Resources Development Project (SWAWRDP)
was initiated as a follow up to conduct feasibility studies of the recommended seven SPs in
order to select the best alternatives for detailed design and implementation. The study,
carried out during 1996-1997 with ADB assistance, showed that the Narail and the Chenchuri
Beel sub-projects stood out as first and second respectively in priority ranking.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 2
Figure – 1 : Chenchuri Beel sub-projects Map
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 3
Figure – 2 : SIP SWC-17+18, Noagram-Gazaria Scheme Map
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 4
The present South West Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management
Project (SWAIWRPMP) is the ultimate outcome of a Project Preparatory Technical Assistance
(PPTA) of ADB executed during 2003-2004.It was decided to divide the selected Sub Projects
into smaller hydrological units for IWMP formulation and efficient implementation as
independent schemes. In the process the Narail Sub Project was broken down to 25 smaller
sub-units.
However, after detailed scrutiny it was found that the scheme boundaries were often
geographical borders defined by roads with open culvert/bridge requiring modification to
define the sub-unit as a hydrological entity as far as practicable.
3. SUB PROJECT OVERVIEW 3.1 SIP Formulation
For the purpose of sound and effective implementation and management system, each sub-project area (FCD/I scheme) will be divided into independent hydrological sub-units (as far as possible) as a unit of implementation. The Consultant Team are now reviewing these and in consultation with the BWDB, beneficiary and LGED (if required) are revising/ modifying the plan and design as necessary. The IWMPs will be implemented on the basis of individual Sub-unit Implementation Plans (SIPs) and will follow the steps described below with the engagement of NGOs, Community Based Organizations (CBOs) and private service providers. To assure a manageable implementation of the various stages, the individual sub-units in any sub-project will be grouped in batches ( Batch-1, 2 & 3). The Consultants, in consultation with the relevant stakeholders, will prepare 4 (four) sample SIPs from Narail sub-project. The preparation of the remaining SIPs will be outsourced to a Firm, to be procured by the BWDB, PMO and trained for the purpose by the ISPMC. Related documents (especially the EIA, EMP and RP) would be prepared by the Firm/NGO staff under the guidance and supervision of PMO/SMO/Consultant. The same procedure will be followed for the implementation of IWMPs for the additional sub-project areas to be selected. The original concept of preparing the balance SIPs were by NGO / Firms, now have been changed and being implemented through ISPM Consultants / PMO with the help of Facilitators, Research Assistants and Planning Engineers.Batch-3 contents 5 SIPs ( 3 in NSP & 2 in CSP, both cluster ) are being prepared jointly by ISPM/PMO. Now previous draft SIP report ( 8 nos ) will be revised new style as batch-3, SWC-17+18 is one of them. 3.2 Location
The Sub-unit SWC-17+18 (titled Noagram-Gazaria Scheme in the PPTA) with a gross area of about 1,471 ha is contained within Compartment # 8 of the Chenchuri Beel Sub-Project.The Sub-unit is bounded by Baje Babra-Chandropur road on the north, Nahaganga river embankment to the east and south east, Chitra river embankment on southwest and Liner khal on the west.Located partly in Peruli and Purulia unions of Kalia Upazila, the area comprises 13 villages (3 in Peruli, 10 in Purulia) and are shown in (Figure -1).
3.3 Topographic Data
The topography ranges from about 2 m PWD in the south to about 3 m PWD along the northern and eastern boundaries forming a gently slope from north to south. The area between the Liner khal and the Chanchuri khal has nearly flat topography dominated by lands with elevations between 2 m PWD and 2.5 m PWD. The area between the Chanchuri khal and the Nabaganga dike has an exactly similar feature dominated by lands with elevation between lass than 1.5 m PWD to over 2 m PWD thus forming a mild lateral slope from west to east and are shown in ( Figure-2).
3.4 Climate
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 5
The project area belongs to the coastal zone with extreme tidal influence. The nearest climatic stations of the sub-project, are Jessore (E-17) and Khulna (E-20) and the nearest rainfall station to the project area is located at Narail (R-461). Project area experiences two distinct seasons such as, Monsoon season and Dry season. Monsoon season, lasting during July to September, is characterized by high temperature, heavy rainfall and high humidity. Dry season during November to March has moderate cool dry weather with little or no rainfall. Pre-monsoon period and Post monsoon period are two truncation periods (comparatively of shorter duration) that separate the monsoon and the winter seasons. The pre-monsoon period is again associated with nor-wester and cyclone storms while post monsoon period is fairly smooth with declining temperature, humidity and storms frequency. It may be added that the project area occasionally suffers from the devastation of severe cyclone storms accompanied by high tidal surges generally during the beginning and the end of monsoon season in the month of May and October. The pre-monsoon rainfall, Annual maximum water level are furnished in Annex – G.
3.5 Communications / Road
The area is accessible by the metalled regional road (Narail-Kalia) down to Baje Babra village in the east and then by metalled Nabaganga embankment towards southwest down to the southern tip near confluence of Nabaganga and Chitra rivers and then northwestwards over the metalled Chitra embankment upto Pateswari (Figure-2). All the villages are located on the relatively higher peripheral lands along the northern road and the eastern and southern embankments along the two rivers.
The main transport on these roads is generally by motorized vehicle, rickshaw and rickshaw van or on foot. Small country boats are also used for communication on the internal khals or canal, particularly in the beel areas during the monsoon season. River transport forms an important link to the peripheral parts of the Sub Project area and its surroundings.
4. IMPACT ASSESSMENT 4.1 Proposed Interventions
The existing infrastructures in the sub-project have been implemented in 1985-86 under programme of DFC-I project. The sub-project area is protected from annual flooding by embankment around most of its periphery. The Regulators are located on the peripheral embankments along Chitra and Nabaganga rivers. Most of the existing drainage channels and khals have been silted up thus reducing the hydraulic capacity of the drainage system as a whole. It is necessary to Re excavation. Due to better performance of this sub project repair and rehabilitation of the facilities, some new construction / rehabilitation works are proposed as shown below:
New Construction of Takimara Ragulator1 Ragulator….……2 Vent - 1.52m X 1.82m
Thorough rehabilitation of Pateswari Ragulator….……….…10 Vent - 1.52m X 1.82m
Thorough rehabilitation of Takimara Ragulator….……...….…2 Vent - 1.52m X 1.82m
Thorough rehabilitation of Noagram Ragulator….………….…1 Vent - 1.52m X 1.82m
Re-Sectioning of Existing Embankment……………………….9.291 km earthwork Ch: Km 70.05 to km 70.95=0.90 km Ch: Km 71.015 to km 71.82=0.805 km Ch: Km 73.61 to km 75.51=1.90 km Ch: Km 76.00 to km 78.656=2.66 km Ch: Km 78.38 to km 80.61=2.23 km Ch: Km 81.930 to km 82.73=0.80 km
Re excavation of khal ……………………………………..…….23.80 km earthwork Liner khal =5.00 km Takimara-Mora khal =4.60 km Noagram khal =1.80 km Naridanga khal = 2.60 km Sourar khal =1.80 km
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 6
Majalir khal =3.40 km Gozaria khal =1.80 km Kumarer khal = 1.80 km At Aterhat New cut = 1.00 km
1mx1m Box sluice …..…….………………………………….….3 Nos
Foot Bridge over Mora, Majalir khal & Noagram khal……...…3 Nos
WMG Office ……………….………………………………..…….2 Nos
Supply of Deep Tubewells (DTW)………………………...…...10 Nos Location of Box culvert /1mx1m Box sluice/ WMG Office and Deep Tubewells (DTW). Will be selected as per WMG/WMA advice. The above Interventions cost is shown in table- 8.
4.2 Land Types
Land Classification in planning of BWDB projects is carried out in relation to average flooding for three conditions:
i) pre-project when interventions to modify the flood regime are yet to be put in place;
ii) post-project when facilities are installed and are in operation. The post-project scenario depicts the modified condition of the area for future planning.
iii) without FCD, when the system deteriorates to the extent that there will be free flow between the river and the beel areas.
The sub unit area SWC-17+18 put down (i) & (ii) condition. The basin or sub unit area water level does not depend only river water level. It depends on the internal water level and also proposed & existing interventions. Inadequate internal water level data we had putted gauge inside the SIP area, 20 years (1987 to 2007) rainfall data analysis have done, calculate drainage modulus and also checked the size of regulator. Considering all circumstances the internal water level at monsoon govern 2.81 mPWD which is shown annex-G, hydrology part.
The Pre-Project water level with in the project is 2.81 mPWD, then the land type pattern
would be :
Fo land (0-.3 m flood) -el. 2.81 m and above;
F1 land (0.3 -.6 m flood) -el. 2.81 m down to 2.51 m;
F2 land (0.9-.1.80 m flood) -el. 2.51 m down to 1.91 below
F3 land (>1.8 m flood) -el. 1.01 m and below
After rehabilitation of all required intervention the internal water level will be 2.51 mPWD, then
the land type pattern would be :
Fo land (0-.3 m flood) -el. 2.51 m and above;
F1 land (0.3 -.6 m flood) -el. 2.51 m down to 2.21 m;
F2 land (0.9-.1.80 m flood) -el. 2.21 m down to 1.61 below
F3 land (>1.8 m flood) -el. 0.71 m and below
The Pre-Project & Post-Project land type and percentage of land change are shown in Table-1 & chart-1 and also are presented in Annex-G. 4.3 Hydrologic Characteristics
A close look of Figure -1 reveals that the Liner khal carries most of the drainage of the SP from way up in north including areas around the Narail-Lohagora road. The huge flow was
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 7
designed to be discharged into the Chitra partly through the 10-vent Pateswari regulator and partly by Chenchuri khal (taking off from Liner khal near northern boundary) through the 2-vent Takimara regulator. According to thumb-rule (1,000 to 1,500 ha per 1.52 m x 1.83 m vent) the Pateswari regulator should be able to evacuate about 60 percent of the entire SP. Presumably, the remainder was designed to be drained through the relatively smaller peripheral Baghbaria, Modina, Noagram, Jadavpur and Bagdanga (1+2) regulators. Any failure of the smaller structures would affect only their localized command areas but malfunctioning of Pateswari and Takimara would be disastrous for a large area. However, for the Pateswari dependent northern part the congestion problem would be less pronounced because of relatively steeper gradient than the flatter south where all the water is likely to accumulate. And this is exactly what has happened over the last decade when all the regulators, excepting those at Bagdanga in the western part of the SP, have become dysfunctional. Now it has become rather difficult to distinguish Compartment 7 (SWC 16) and Compartment 8 (SWC-17+18) as independent entities because of coverage under one sheet of water during peak monsoon. In other words, the area has suffered a regression almost to a pre-project scenario.
As for the Sub-unit SWC-17+18, it can be seen from Table 1 that about 22% of the area belongs to F2 and F3 categories of land implying susceptibility to flooding from .9 m to over 1.8 m while 77% belongs to F0 and F1 categories that may suffer none or shallower flooding. Figure -2 shows that a thin strip of F0 land (about 42%) is located along the northern boundary with 1 more isolated spot on the western boundary below which a strip of F1 land (about 36%) occurs along northern and western fringes. Rest of the Sub-unit is covered by F2 lands (about 21%) all around and F3 lands in the middle. Such occurrence of different types of lands has rendered the terrain saucer-shaped.
4.4 Agriculture Assessment of the existing situation of agriculture in the project area has been based on production, yield and other data collected from the respective Upazila Agriculture Offices, supplemented by participatory appraisal surveys, through Focus Group Discussion ( FGD ) in the field and interviews with farmers, village leaders and other knowledgeable persons about agricultural activities in their areas. Developments in agriculture expected to result from the implementation of the proposed project are based on the present situation in the area and a careful consideration of the expected impact of the proposed engineering works on physical conditions in the project areas. The major impact of these works will be on the basis of lands, benefiting from irrigation, flood control and drainage and ensuring safety of land and homestead from erosion and inundation. By Focus Group Discussion (FGD) the river water of the areas become saline which creates problem for irrigating during pre monsoon cropping. Thus test of river water was carried out from Dec. ’09 to Jun. ‘10 at various locations of existing regulator. The observed river water salinity are shown Table – 17 & Chart- 7.The salinity of this area is controlled by the Jadavpur, Takimara and Pateswari regulator. Needs a action plan through WMG / WMA for appropriate O & M of the regulators according to threshold (tolerance) value. Threshold (tolerance) value for rice is => 2.0 PPT.In Figure-4 shown pre-project and post-project Crop Calendar according to land type and cropping pattern, Sub project area hydrograph and also show this area observed salinity impact. Cropping pattern, production etc are furnished in Annex – A. The main sub-project benefit (positive impact) is increased agriculture production (Table 4 & Table 5), specially an overall increase of 5798 MT, 3491 MT for cereals; production of non-cereal will increase by 2340 MT and cash crop (Aromatic rice, Maize, Winter Vegetables and Soybeans ) will be increase by 5115 MT in future and are presented in Table-5. Crop intensity Pre-Project is 212% and Post-Project will be achieved 250 %.The Table-10 shows the crop production summary, Table 6 illustrates crop area, yield, production, and value of production by land type under both pre and post project conditions.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 8
Figure-3 : Pre Project and Post Project Crop Calendar & Cropping pattern Carry on
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 9
Figure-3 : Pre Project and Post Project Crop Calendar & Cropping pattern
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 10
4.5 Fisheries Fisheries are an important sub-sector contributing to the socio-economic activities of the Narail Sub project area. Table 7 and Chart 5 show the estimated potential open water fisheries impacts, in terms of habitat, yield and production changes. As FCD sub-project the structure will remain closed during monsoon and open water fisheries will be reduced. There is negative impact on fish production. Capture fish product is decreases and culture fish product is increases due to sub-project intervention. From Table-7 & chart-5 and Table-11 it is seen that culture fisheries will be increased from 185 MT to 332 MT ie. by 147 MT however capture fisheries will be decreased from 34 MT to 19 MT ie. by 15 MT, after rehabilitation of this Sub Project Area. Some habitat expansion / improvement will be achieved through water retention in the beel and khal. Training program for culture fish practices will be provided to WMG / WMA. Also, improvements in fish production will depend substantially on efforts directed towards stocking and expanding pond aquaculture and cooperative aquaculture in the khal and in the beel. Residual impacts on subsistence fisheries (primarily landless and small / marginal farmers) are expected to be partially or entirely compensated by positive employment and nutritional impacts associated with increased agricultural activity and production. Fishing / navigation as a primary occupation is reported to be insignificant of sub-project residents. There may be a need for the WMG / WMA to address the need for rehabilitation of this group. 4.6 Environment The sub-unit reflects the typical scenario of rural areas near coastal zone where lack of rapid industrialization including brick-fields and salt water shrimp cultivation is yet to cause any pronounced degradation of environment. Of course, some downslide has occurred but that is comparable to the general pattern and the observed changes are indeed, less alarming than those found in many other locations of the coastal belt. For example, siltation of khals and creeks under tidal influence is a common phenomenon near the coast which has been exacerbated by the reduction of upland flow in the Ganges. It has also caused migration of some aquatic animals while in fishery and forestry sectors many exotic varieties have replaced the indigenous species purely for commercial reasons. The environmental study has examined the following environmental components:
physical;
biological;
human and economic; and
quality of life. The study has been carried out in three phases as below and are presented in Annex-C.
initial environmental assessment (IEE);
environmental impact assessment (EIA); and
environmental management plan (EMP). 4.7 Surface Water The availability of surface and ground water was assessed from TR-15 of MPO and FAP 4 reports. Annex-G of Hydrology are presented the availability of surface water in the area. Moreover invert level of the regulators in peripheral embankment are quite low (-0.60 mPWD), allowing 0.64 m to 2.27m depth of water during dry season. Water can be made available in the khals through the regulators during each high tide, which can be stored in the khal for dry season irrigation by closing the C/S lift gate.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 11
4.8 Socio Economy 4.8.1 Stakeholders Located in Purulia and Peruli Unions under the Kalia Upazila, the sub-unit area is spread, partly or wholly, over 13 villages of Narail District. The population is estimated as 16730 with a sex-ratio of 152 males per 148 females as against the national average of 106.6.The proportion of functionally landless people (owning < 0.2 ha) stands at 40% of the population. The number of households (HH) stands at 3179 with agricultural farming as the predominant means of income. The number of female headed households is about 8% and they are mostly poor. The Farm-size distribution and the occupational pattern are presented in both Tabular form and Graphics in Table 3, Chart 2 and Chart 3 and also are presented in Annex-D.
Fifteen (15) nos traditional fishermen households exists in this sub–unit area since about 8th generation, all are of Hindu religion and social order is in the name of Rajbongshi and also fifty two (52) nos non-traditional Muslim fishermen households exists in this area. Now most of the fishermen have changed their profession in course of time due to lack of open water fish in the river, beel and khals having less availability of fish due to over fishing. Some fishermen are now engaged in agriculture, catching fish in the beel during monsoon, some time caching fish in Gher (Close water fishing inland) on hire and fish trading. Most of the fishermen families are becoming affluent day by day; they are taking education and trying to live a better life. As per field data about 12% of traditional & non-traditional fishermen are connected with agriculture, they catch fish in the beel during monsoon and also catch fish in Gher (Close water fishing) on hire; about 45 % of traditional & non-traditional fishermen are engaged in culture fish production, fish trading and labour and about 42% of traditional & non-traditional fishermen are fishing in khal and river, fishing in beel during monsoon and fishing in Gher (Close water fishing) on hire. In this area some Muslim and Hindu fishermen ( Total=114 nos) are also catching fish in beel area during monsoon period, actually they are farmer, daily labourers, Rickshaw Pooler etc. They have been shown as part time fishermen. So there have no adverse impact in the traditional Hindu fishermen community.
Sustained lack of O & M has led to deterioration of FCD projects to such an extent that those have been rendered dysfunctional and need thorough rehabilitation with the inclusion of IWRM. One of the fundamental objectives of the SWAIWRM project is, therefore, to formulate restoration plans for the under performing schemes through participatory process with the ultimate aim of gradual transfer of O & M responsibilities to the Stakeholders/Beneficiaries. Associated with this is the important aspect of the beneficiaries' contribution to O & M in order to induce the sense of belonging and ownership of the scheme among the stakeholders. 4.8.2 Peoples Participation In order to involve stakeholders, public consultations would be held from grassroots at village upto Union, Upazila and District level involving stakeholders, local elites, LGIs, line agency and government representative. Instead of making a presentation, problem identification and the perceived solution there to would be extracted from the stakeholders through extensive and intensive dialogue. It ultimately leads to the realization of the need to form WMOs for sustainability of implemented schemes. The entire process would follow guidelines provided in the GPWM. This sub unit area is located in Purulia & Peruli (2) Unions under Kalia Upazilas, the sub-unit area is spread, partly or wholly, over 13 villages of Narail District. So far, consultation meetings are to be held in all villages and ultimately at the union level. Proceedings of all the meetings will be duly minuted along with the list of participants. Meanwhile, training needs for WMO members have been identified, training modules formulated and annual training plan prepared. All relevant detail about villages and procedures for WMO forming to ensure participatory planning, implementation through O & M and monitoring in the long-run. 10 Nos WMG will be formed and are presented in Figure-4; they will be registered in WMG with the Doc (with MOU) and look after future O & M of the water infrastructure and are presented in Annex-E.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 12
Figure – 4 : SIP SWC-17+18, Noagram-Gazaria Scheme WMG Map
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 13
4.8.3 Training It needs to be stressed that rehabilitation of dilapidated project facilities is not the only means to an end; training of the stakeholders (EAs) and beneficiaries) in all domains is an equally essential project component in order to realize the stipulated benefits as well as to ensure sustainability. Therefore, provision has been made to cater to the needs of training and demonstration including necessary physical works in the spheres of Agriculture, Fisheries, Environment, Gender and Livelihood and WMO. Detailed training plan on each subject has been prepared spanning 2009-2010, 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13 with the expectation of continuity beyond and are presented in Annex-H. 4.8.4 Gender and Livelihood Gender and livelihood are two complementary aspects of the SWAIWRPM project. The gender aspect relates to involvement of women in water management organizations. At least 30 per cent of the seats of the managing committee of the WMG and WMA shall be allocated for women as per the Guideline for Participatory Water Management (GPWM). This project got a chance for livelihood enhancement. Crop and fish cultivation through better water resource management are the important and major livelihood enhancement activities for the poor which can only be ensured after the successful implementation of proposed scheme. Especially the poor are interested to participate in construction and maintenance of water structure through LCS. It will increase their income. Women members of the poor household are interested to have skills on home based jute works, duck rearing and puffed rice making, sweet rice ball (Moa), sesame toffee, pressed rice etc to undertake IGA and are presented in Annex-D. 4.8.5 Collective Action Plan (CAP)
Collective Action Plan (CAP) of the Sub-unit Implementation Plan (SIP) will be prepared after formation of Water Management Group (WMG) and Water Management Association (WMA) with consultation with WMG members. The related (Agriculture, Fishery, O & M and Gender & Livelihood etc.) information for the CAP will be collected by the Facilitators through Focus Group Discussion (FGD) from the WMG members. Farther additional information will be collected through “Walk Through” jointly by the Project Management Office (PMO), ISPMC, Facilitators and the WMG members. After collection and analyzing the data the CAP of the SIP will be prepared. The CAP may be on the following fields:
(A) Agriculture:
i) Soil test for acidity, Alkalinity and PH and water test for Salinity are needed. These tests can be done by WMG through DAE or other sources. A kit for Water Salinity test may be provided to each WMG.
ii) Procurement of quality seeds and fertilizers may be done by WMG from the dealers and distribute the same to the beneficiaries centrally.
iii) In order to minimize the organic matter in soil, demonstration on compost preparation could be practices at the farmer’s field.
iv) Infrastructures development needs to be planned to minimize the scarcity irrigation water.
v) Training Farmers need training on modern methods of crop production, cultivation of High value crops (HVC), Training on IPM / ICM and practical training through establishment of demonstration plots on different crops and varieties.
vi) Marketing WMG can take initiatives to sell their products collectively to a big business centre.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 14
(B) Fisheries:
i) To enhance fisheries production each WMG may be provided with a kit for water quality test and Fisheries Sub-committee of WMG can take initiatives for soil testing from BFRI, Jessore.
ii) WMG can procure quality fry / fingerling from the reputed hatchery and distribute the same to the beneficiaries.
iii) To minimize the shortage of organic fertilizer in pond for increasing productivity, cow dung / compost to pond can be practiced. Additional amount of compost need to be provided to fish pond.
iv) Use of high doses of pesticides to be discouraged through practicing IPM / ICM.
v) Training Rigorous training need to be imparted to enhance knowledge on modern methods of production and also high value fish, establishment of demonstration pond would help the farmers for increasing fish production and dissemination of technology.
vi) Marketing WMG can take initiatives to sell their fish collectively to a big business centre.
(C) O & M
i) New Construction of Takimara Ragulator1 Ragulator….……2 Vent - 1.52m X 1.82m
ii) Thorough rehabilitation of Pateswari Ragulator….……….…10 Vent - 1.52m X 1.82m
iii) Thorough rehabilitation of Takimara Ragulator….…….….…2 Vent - 1.52m X 1.82m
iv) Thorough rehabilitation of Noagram Ragulator….…….….…1 Vent - 1.52m X 1.82m
v) Re-Sectioning of Existing Embankment……………….9.291 km earthwork vi) Re excavation of khal ………………………..…..…….23.80 km earthwork vii) 1mx1m Box sluice …..…….………………………………….….3 Nos viii) Foot Bridge over Mora, Majalir khal & Noagram khal……...…3 Nos ix) WMG Office ……………….………………………………..…….2 Nos x) Supply of Deep Tubewells (DTW)………………………...…...10 Nos
Training a) WMA members shall have to be trained for operation of the structures for
proper Water Management. b) BWDB officials should also be given the same training. c) Training on maintenance is also be imparted to both WMG and BWDB
officials. d) Gate operators should be trained regarding gate operation including practical
training at their respective gate sides. e) The topics of training may be (i) maintenance need assessment (ii) type of
maintenance work (iii) role and responsibility of each party (iv) maintenance schedule (v) budgeting and (vi) monitoring.
The identified Collective actions will be transformed into implementation plans to be supported under the project. The names of the facilities to be managed by WMG/WMA will be specified in the CAP
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 15
5. O & M ISSUES Inadequate budgetary allocation is a major factor for the lack of upkeep of FCD projects ultimately rendering them dysfunctional to such as extent that necessitates thorough rehabilitation. It is, indeed, time that concerned parties (Beneficiary, PAP, BVVDB, Donors etc.) adopt a policy that this shall be the major rehabilitation. Another major factor behind this is lack of stakeholder-participation in project activities. It is well established that active stakeholder-participation is a 'must' for sustainability of FCD projects and now stakeholder-involvement in entire life cycle of any water development project from identification through O&M has been made mandatory in the National Water Policy (NWPo). The ultimate objective is to gradually transfer the O&M responsibilities to the stakeholders reducing pressure on the government exchequer where the line agencies of the government would play the role of facilitators. However, their services would still be needed in case of major works requiring capital investment.With this end in view, the rehabilitation of the sub-unit has been planned by incorporating the concepts of IVVRM and stakeholder participation in order to ensure last rehabilitation and sustainability.To that end, the Project requires formation of VVMOs by beneficiaries on the basis of villages or clusters thereof with at least 70% enrolment of whom about 30% are to be women. To demonstrate their willingness each VVMO is required to make on upfront contribution to the capital investment equivalent to one year O&M costs. Maintenance requirement of FCD schemes are generally classified as: Preventive : Undertaken throughout the year that includes minor repairs of embankments, removal of weeds, water hyacinths etc. from khals and greasing, painting, minor repairs of and removal of debris from hydraulic structures; Periodic : Requiring greater resources than preventive maintenance based on checklist prepared at the end of each monsoon that includes resection of dykes, re-excavation of khals and larger repair of structures such as partial or full replacement of gates, hoist, rubber seals etc. ; and Emergency Repair: Unforeseen and unpredictable caused by sudden massive floods or events like cyclone leading to breach or overtopping of embankment and/or severe damage to structures. The preventive/routine maintenance, in its entirety, appears the responsibility of-the V\/MGs while the periodic maintenance might see a mix of involvement and cost-sharing. On the other hand, in case of emergency the VVMGs might be conveniently engaged with their physical labour as part of the contribution in kind / borne by BWDB. However, a Maintenance Plan for the Sub-unit (SWC-17+18) has been formulated where responsibilities have been delineated and costs for periodic maintenance worked out as shown in Table 9.The total cost of preventive and periodic maintenance for SWC-17+18 has been estimated as Tk.17.387 lac per annum of which WMA share would be Tk. 4.158 lac with BWDB bearing Tk.13.229 lac. The WMA / WMG share comes to Tk. 404/ha/year and are presented in Annex-F. 6. FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS The PRA examined three questions related to sub-project (here SWN 9) viability and sustainability: (i) Is there broad popular support for this sub-project, (ii) Is there any opposition to the sub-project, (iii) Is the sub-project socially acceptable, (iv) Is there any negative environmental impact and (v) Are the beneficiaries willing to form in to a WMG / WMA, pay O
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 16
& M contribution, assist with land acquisition and take full responsibility for the operation and maintenance. In relation to these questions, the findings of the CAP and work through (One Go) are: People activity supported the sub-project. There is no opposition. Socially acceptable No adverse impact on environment. The beneficiaries expressed willingness to form WMG / WMA, pay O & M contribution, assist with land acquisition and to take full responsibility for O & M after the sub-project is complete. This sub-project (SIP-9) passed each of the standard social, environment and economic viability tests used for SAIWRPMP sub-projects. The relevant financial and economic information is presented in tables 10 through 14. The status of the sub-project relative to the SAR sub-project selection / acceptability criteria is shown in Table 15. As such the sub-project is socially acceptable, technically economically viable and economically feasible. Considering people demand and lower development cost (Benefit-Cost ratio 0.78, Table-14) and economic ( 9.00%, Table-14 ) and financial (7.00 %, Table-13) rate of return, it is recommended to implement the SIP. The economic sensibility has been shown in Table-12. All residual adverse environmental impacts of the sub-project are expected to be either not significant, or acceptable under the circumstances except reduction of capture fisheries. There is also no adverse impact on the eco-system. 7. MULTI - CRITERIA ANALYSIS In addition to the economic sensitivity tests, a preliminary exercise of Multi-Criteria Analysis has been performed with available data an insight gained through PRAs. The result is presented as a matrix in Table 15 which shows the proposed scheme is technically feasible, economically viable and socially acceptable.
APPRAISAL
TABLES & CHARTS
ANNEX – A
AGRICULTURE
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 1
Noagram-Gajaria Scheme (SWC-17 + 18)
Agriculture Summary
The gross area of SWC-17 + 18 is 1471 ha. According to PPTA net cultivable area (NCA) has
been estimated at 70% of the gross area for Chenchuri Beel Sub-Project. Thus, the NCA of the
SIP is calculated at 1029 ha with a present cropped area of 2178 ha yielding a cropping
intensity of 212%. Future total cropped area has been estimated at 2569 ha with a cropping
intensity of 250%.Annual production of Cereal crops will be increased by 3286 MT after
rehabilitation. In the future Cropping Pattern, 18 % of the cropped area will be covered by High
Value Crops (HVCs).
Based on the hydrological analysis ,the land area under the SIP have been figured out as
F0,F!,F2 & F3 as per present & future governing water levels on which total cropped area,
cropping pattern, cropping intensity and total production have been estimated.
Data furnished in the report are based on the agricultural information collected from the field
(SIP area) through Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) by the Facilitators and compiled by the
Research Assistants. Moreover, for authentication, secondary data from the local DAE office
has been consulted.
A total of 10- Water Management Groups (WMGs) have already been organized & formed in
the Sub-Unit. Data for Collective Action Plan (CAP) have been collected from the WMG-
members by the Facilitators by ‘Walkthroughs’ and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs).
Present Agriculture
The present agriculture in the sub-unit is hampered by poor drainage, resulting in water logging in the lower areas during the wet season. Conversely, the higher areas suffer from water shortage especially during the pre-monsoon season. From the gathered data, it is known that 60% of the land are being irrigated through STWs and LLPs.
Present cropping pattern and production have been provided in Tables 3 and 4. Agriculture in
the sub-unit is dominated by rice cultivation covering over 50% of the total cropped area
followed by jute (19%), wheat(12%), mustard (11%) and pulses (8%)
Present production of major crops (cereals) have been calculated as 3581 metric tonnes of
which rice is 3057 MT and 524 MT of wheat is produced annually.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 2
Future Agriculture
Future cropping pattern and production have been provided in Tables 5 and 6. Future
agriculture under changed scenario, shows that cereal crops (rice, maize and wheat)will cover
72% of the total cropped area followed by Jute (9%),Vegetables(7%), Soybean (7%), and
Oilseeds (5%) with an estimated cropping intensity of 250% and total cropped area of 2569 ha.
In the future Cropping Pattern, 18 % of the cropped area will be covered by High Value Crops
(HVCs).
Annual production of major crops (cereals) have been estimated as 6867 MT of which rice will
be 5761 MT ,Maize will be 666 MT and wheat will be 440 MT. Thus, annual Cereal production
of the Sub-Unit has been estimated to be increased by 3286 MT after rehabilitation.
To facilitate this shift the DAE,NGOs and the Project will provide extension support to the
farmers in the form of improved agricultural techniques, integrated pest/crop management,
home gardening (for women), etc. Detailed agricultural activities for the SIP have been
furnished along with the estimated budget provisions in the form of training, demonstrations,
agricultural fairs, motivational tours, nursery development, etc . Further, a Bar diagram has
been shown to spell out various activities for agricultural development in the Sub-Unit area
throughout the entire Project period.
A budget has been reserved for an amount of BDT 60.55 million for the agricultural program for
total project under implementation. The agricultural development (enhancement) activities of
the SIP have been estimated at BDT 14 lacs for the entire Project period.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 3
1.0 Description
The gross area of SWC 17 +18 is 1471 ha. According to PPTA net cultivable area (NCA) has
been estimated at 70% of the gross area for Chenchur beel Sub-Project. Thus, the NCA is
calculated at 1029 ha with a present cropped area of 2178 ha yielding a cropping intensity of
212%.Future total cropped area has been estimated at 2569 ha with a cropping intensity of
250%. Production of Cereal crops will be increased by 3286 MT after rehabilitation. . In the
future Cropping Pattern, 18 % of the cropped area will be covered by High Value Crops
(HVCs).
Based on the hydrological analysis, the land area under the SIP have been figured out as
F0,F!,F2 & F3 as per present & future governing water levels on which total cropped area,
cropping pattern, cropping intensity and total production have been estimated.
Data furnished in the report are based on the agriculture information collected from the field
through Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) by the Facilitators and compiled by the Research
Assistants. Moreover, for authentication, the secondary data from the local DAE office have
been consulted.
A total of 10-Water Management Groups (WMGs) have already been organized & formed in
the Sub- Unit. Data for Collective Action Plan (CAP) have been collected by the Facilitators
from the WMG-members during FGDs.
1.1 Present Agriculture
The Tables and items below are the compiled information on the agricultural data of the SIP,
which to be considered as Present Agriculture:
Table-1: Crops & Varieties cultivated during various seasons
Seasons Crops Crops & Varieties
Rabi Kharif-1 Kharif-II
Paddy Wheat Pulse Mustard Paddy Jute Paddy
Boro: HYV – BRRI dhan 28, BRRI dhan 29. Hybrid – Hira, ,ACI, ,Laltir, ,etc. Aus: Ratul, Ratna, Buri ,Gambhur--local varieties. HYV Aman: BR-11 Aman: Jabra, Hori, ,,Manohar,Sona Digha, Lal Digha-- Local varieties.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 4
Table-2: Yield of Major crops/ha.
Crops Variety Average Yield per ha(MT)
Paddy Aus (Local) 1.2
Aman (Local) 1.5
HYV Boro 5.0
Hybrid Boro 5.5
Pulse 2.8
Mustard 1.5
Wheat 2.0
Jute 2.5
The present agriculture in the sub-unit is hampered by poor drainage, resulting in water logging in the lower areas during the wet season. Conversely, the higher areas suffer from water shortage especially during the pre-monsoon season. From the gathered data, it is known that 60% of the land are being irrigated through STWs and LLPs.
Present cropping pattern and production have been provided in Tables 3 and 4. Agriculture in
the sub-unit is dominated by rice cultivation covering over 50% of the total cropped area
followed by jute(19%), wheat(12%), mustard (11%) and pulses (8%)
Present production of major crops (cereals) have been calculated as 3581 metric tonnes of
which rice is 3057 and 524 metric tonnes of wheat is produced annually.
Table - 3 : Present Cropping Pattern by Land Type
Land type and flood
depth
Cropping Pattern No. of Crop
Net area (ha)
Cropped area (ha) Rabi Kharif - I Kharif - II
FO (0 - 30 cm)
Pulses B.Aus HYV T. Aman 3 70 210
HYV Boro Jute 2 153 306
Wheat Jute 2 162 324
Mustard B.Aus LT.Aman 3 50 150
Sub-total 435 990
F1 (31 - 90 cm)
Wheat Jute 2 100 200
Pulses B.Aus 2 113 226
Hybrid Boro
LT. Aman 2 69 138
Mustard B.Aus 2 92 184
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 5
Sub-total 374 748
F2 (91 - 180 cm)
HYV Boro B.Aman Cont’d 2 120 240
Mustard B.Aman Cont’d 2 100 200
Sub-total 220 440
Grand Total 1029 2178
Cropping Intensity - 212%
Table - 4 furnishes the existing crop wise area, yield and total production which need to be improved
through the required development of infrastructures, re-excavation of khals etc. through which
agricultural production will obviously by increased.
Table - 4: Present Position : Crops with their production by Land Type
Total Cropped
area
Net cultivated
area
Cropping intensity Land type and
flood depth Name of
Crop Area (ha)
Average Yield
Total productio
n
(ha) (ha) (%) (mt/ha) (mt)
2178 1029 212
FO (0 - 30 cm)
Pulses 70 2.8 196
Jute 315 2.5 787.5
HYV Boro 153 5.0 765
HYV T. Aman
120 3.5 420
B.Aus 120 1.2 144
Wheat 162 2 324
Mustard 50 1.5 75
Sub-total 990 2711.5
F1 (31 - 90cm)
Wheat 100 2 200
Pulses 113 2.8 316.4
Jute 100 2.5 250
B.Aus 205 1.2 246
Hybrid Boro 69 5.5 379.5
LT.Aman 69 2.5 172.5
Mustard 92 1.5 138
Sub-total 748 1702.4
F2 B.Aman 220 1.5 330
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 6
(91 - 180 cm)
HYV Boro 120 5.0 600
Mustard 100 1.5 150
Sub-total 440 1080
2178 1029 212 Grand Total 2178 5493.9
Present annual rice production has been calculated as 3057 MT and wheat as 524 MT. Thus, annual Cereal production is 3581 MT.
Extracts from the collected Data: Regarding availability of seeds, most of the farmers have opined that the condition is good. Following steps could be taken for better availability of seeds.
1.1.1 Steps for seed availability
1. Own collection.
2. Farmers should get directly from the Government.
3. Supplying of good seed by BADC.
4. To arrange training on production and preservation of seed.
1.1.2 Irrigation Facilities From the gathered data, it is known that 60% of the land are being irrigated through STWs and LLPs.
1.1.2.a Problems of using irrigation facilities
1. Water scarcity in the khals during draught period. 2. Saline water enter into the field during Mid-March to April and damages Boro rice. 3. Inactive regulator/Sluice gates in the khals. 4. Excessive siltation in the khals. 5. Poor drainage facilities. 6. Number of STWs is inadequate as per requirement. 7. Low water discharge through Swallow Tube Well during dry season.
For further expansion of irrigation facilities, following points may be taken into consideration.
1.1.2.b Steps to improve irrigation facilities
1. Immediate repairing of existing regulator or reinstallation of new regulator. 2. Re-excavation of existing khals to easy and quick drain out of water from the field. 3. Excavation of new khals. 4. Supply of electricity for irrigation. 5. Deposition of pure water for irrigation.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 7
1.1.3.a Water Salinity
In the SIP- area, there exists some amount of water salinity but within permissible limit upto end of February.
1.1.3.b Ways to mitigate Water Salinity
To check the entrance of saline water from the river into the khals by repairing or installing regulators.
Use of saline tolerant rice varieties.
Embankment need to be repaired.
To test water salinity regularly.
Use of zypsum fertilizer.
.1.4.a Soil salinity
Soil of the SIP-area are quite fertile and responsive to addition of fertilizers as per characteristics of Gangetic alluvium. There is a complain of soil salinity problem at the lower areas- beel areas.
1.1.4.b Ways to mitigate soil salinity
Awareness raising among the farmers
Soil testing in field as per farmers’ demand
Cultivation of salinity tolerant rice varieties
Check the entrance of saline water from the river into the khals by repairing or installing regulators
Embankment to be repaired
Use of zypsum fertilizer.
1.1.5.a Extent of Fertilizer Use
Farmers are generally using over and imbalanced doses of chemical Fertilizers because of lack of adequate knowledge about proper doses of Fertilizers requiring training on crop-wise Fertilizers application.
Farmers are not also using Compost/Organic Fertilizers.
1.1.5.b Reasons for not using Compost/Organic Fertilizers
Lack of domestic animals/cows.
Cow dung is used as fuel due to scarcity of firewood.
Less awareness and lack of knowledge of Compost preparation
Farmers have no ideas about Green manure.
1.1.6.a Use of Insecticides
Farmers are using moderate doses of insecticides. They do not possess adequate knowledge on the required doses of insecticides application.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 8
1.1.6.b Practice of IPM/ICM by the Farmers
Farmers have little knowledge on IPM/ICM .Extension activities in this regard needs to be geared up.:
1.1.7.a Training topics for the Farmers
1. Compost Preparation & Green manuring 2. Fertilizer and Water Management. 3. Cultivation of HYV Rice
4. IPM/ICM
5. Soil testing
6. Water salinity testing
7. Nursery development
8. Vegetables Production
1.1.7.b Training topics for Women
1. Homestead Gardening
2. Poultry rearing
3. Seed preservation
4. Goat & Cow rearing.
The following problems are being identified which hamper better crop production. If these
problems could be solved, more production could be achieved.
1.1.8.a Problems of crop production
1. Water logging.
2. Soil salinity
3. Water salinity
4. Lack of awareness on modern technology of agriculture development
5. High price of inputs
6. Lack of good quality of seeds
7. Proper Water management
8. Marketing facilities.
Following points need to be considered to mitigate the production problems through the project
activities and regular programme of DAE.
1.1.8.b Steps to mitigate those problems
1. Re-excavation of canal to prevent water logging.
2. Improving the irrigation system and water management.
3. Reducing the price of diesel.
4. Reducing the price of Fertilizer.
5. Using the improved technology in agriculture development.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 9
6. Perform the duties of agricultural officers/staffs through close contact with the farmers
to make aware of soil quality, uses of seeds and fertilizers, techniques of pest control
etc. i.e. technology dissemination.
People are expecting better production and livelihood from this project. Project intervention will
hopefully fulfil their aspirations through their active participation.
1.2 Future Scenario
Future cropping pattern and production have been provided in Tables 5 and 6. Future
agriculture under changed scenario, shows that cereal crops (rice,maize and wheat) cover 72%
of total cropped area followed by Jute (9%),Vegetables(7%), Soybean (7%), and Oilseeds
(5%) with an estimated cropping intensity of 250% and total cropped area of 2569 ha. In the
future Cropping Pattern, 18 % of the cropped area will be covered by High Value Crops
(HVCs).
Annual production of major crops (cereals) have been estimated as 6867 MT of which rice will
be 5761 MT, maize will be 666 MT and wheat will be 440 MT. Thus, annual Cereal production
of the Sub-Unit has been estimated to be increased by 3286 MT after rehabilitation.
Table - 5: Future after Rehabilitation: Cropping Pattern by Land Type
Land type and flood depth
Cropping Pattern No. of Crop
Net Area (ha)
Cropped area (ha) Rabi Kharif - I Kharif - II
FO (0 - 30 cm)
Winter Vegetables
T.Aus 2 185 370
Wheat Jute HYV T. Aman 3 110 330
Soybean Maize HYV T. Aman 3 121 363
Aromatic Rice
HYV T. Aman 2 175 350
Sub-total 591 1413
F1 (31 - 90 cm)
Wheat Jute HYV T. Aman 3 110 330
HYV Boro Sesame HYV T. Aman 3 120 360
Soybean T.Aus HYV T. Aman 3 50 150
Hybrid Boro HYV T. Aman 2 100 200
Sub-total 380 1040
F2
(91-180cm) HYV Boro B.Aman Cont'd 2 58 116
Sub-total 58 116
Grand total 1029 2569
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 10
Cropping Intensity =250% Table - 6 : Future with Project Position : Crops with their Production by Land Type
Total Cropped
area
Net cultivated
area
Cropping intensity Land type and
flood depth Name of Crops
Area (ha)
Average Yield
Total production
(ha) (ha) (%) (mt/ha) (mt)
Winter Vegetables
185 17 3145
2569 1029 250
FO (0 - 30 cm)
T.Aus 185 3 370
Wheat 110 2 220
Soybean 121 2 242
Maize 121 5.5 665.5
Jute 110 2.5 270
HYV T. Aman
406 3.5 1421
Aromatic Rice
175 5.5 962.5
Sub-total 1413 7296
Wheat 110 2 220
F1 Jute 110 2.5 275
(31-90 cm) HYV T. Aman
380 3.5 1330
Hybrid Boro 100 5.5 550
Sesame 120 1.5 180
Soybean 50 2 100
T.Aus 50 3 150
HYV Boro 120 5.0 600
Sub-total 1040 3405
(91-180 cm) B.Aman 58 1.5 87
HYV Boro 58 5.0 290
Sub-total 116 377
2569 1029 250 Grand total 2569 1178
Future cereal production has been estimated as 6867 MT of which rice will be 5761MT,Maize will be 666 MT and wheat will be 440 MT. Present cereal production has been calculated at 3581 MT. Thus, annual cereal production will be increased by 3286 MT.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 11
2.0 Future Agricultural Development Programs
After collecting, compiling and analysing the data based on existing agriculture conditions and
discussions with the farmers of the sub-unit; Following agricultural development programs have
been planned for implementation by the project.
2.1 Demonstration Programs
Demonstration is an important method for rapid extension of improved agro-technology of
various crops. Major objective of the demonstration is to introduce new crops and improved
technology with a view to increasing productivity and thereby income generation of farmers.
Modern varieties of crops and other technologies developed by various National Agricultural
Researches(NARs)Institutes are disseminated to farmers through demonstration. The
extension of Agricultural Services should be widely facilitated so that farmers can obtain advice
and support when they want to try new crops to increase cropping intensity and production.
Demonstration farms/trials plots will be established in sub-project area.
Following detailed Demonstration Programs have been formulated for the SIP for the
entire Project period.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 12
echnology Demonstrations for FY, 2010-11, 2011-2012,2012-13 (for 3- years):
Technology
Units Farmers Number Unit Cost Demo.
Cost (Tk.) Cost for field
day (Tk.)
Remuneration for the
Supervising Officer (Tk.)*
Total Cost (Tk.)
No. Area Male Female (Tk.)
1. Demo. on compost preparation 3 Nos. 1 dcm. each 2 1 3000 9000 5000 each for 100 farmers
3000 per demo.
33000
3. Demonstration of Urea Super Granules (GUTI’ Urea) to Boro
10 Nos. 33 dcm. each
10 - 2500 25000 5000 each for 100 farmers
3000 per demo.
105000
5. Demonstration on Sex Pheromones 10 Nos. 33 dcm. each
7 3 3000 30000 5000 each for 100 farmers
3,000 per demo
110000
FY 2009-10
TOTAL 23 Nos. 19 4 64000 248000
2. Varietal Demo. of Wheat (BR-42, Bijoy, Prodip)
5 Nos. 33 dcm. each
5 - 3000 15000 5000 each for 100 farmers
3000 per demo 55000
3. Demonstration of Maize Production 12 Nos. 33 dcm. each
12 - 5000 60000 5000 each for 100 farmers
3000 per demo 156000
4. Demonstration of Mustard (BARI-6) 10 Nos. 33 dcm. each
10 - 2500 25000 5000 each for 100 farmers
3000 per demo 105000
FY 2010-11
TOTAL 27 Nos. 27 100000 316000
1. Varietal Demo. of Boro (BR-47) 4 Nos. 33 dcm. each
4 - 2500 10000 5000 each for 100 farmers
3000 per demo 42000
2. Demonstration of Soybean Production 10 Nos. 33 dcm. each
5 5 2000 20000 5000 each for 100 farmers
3000 per demo 100000
FY 2011-12
TOTAL 14 Nos. 9 5 30,000 142,000
* One field level officer will supervise each demonstration intensively throughout the whole crop season (approx. 3-months). Summery of cost for Demonstration : 1. Cost for the FY 2010-11=Tk.2,48,,000/- 2. Cost for the FY 2011-12= Tk 3,16,500/- 3. Cost for the FY 2012-13 =Tk. 1,42000/-
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 13
Total Tk. 7,06,500/-( Total Taka Seven lacs six thousand five hundred only).
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 14
2.2 Training programs for farmers
Human resources development through training of farmers, officials and trainers will be
provided under the Agricultural Extension Component.
The farmers will be trained by DAE/Livestock/Fishery staff after getting TOT from the Project.
Training will be provided to the farmers for integrated pest management to minimize the
negative impact of agro-chemicals on the environment. The use of compost will also reduce the
possible negative impacts agro-chemicals on the environment. Agricultural extension focusing
on home gardens and livestock to women for increased production of vegetables will be
provided.
A detailed Training Plan along with the cost estimates have been formulated for
the beneficiaries of the SIP is presented as follows:
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 15
Detailed Costing of Training for FY, 2010-11, 2011-2012,2012-13 (for 3- years):
Sl. No.
Topic of Training Participants Number of
Participants
Tra
inin
g A
llo
wan
ce/
da
y (
A)
No
.of
tra
ine
e (
B)
No
. o
f d
ay (
C)
Tra
inin
g A
llo
wan
ce
(to
tal)
(A
XB
XC
) =
D
No
. o
f sessio
n
(E
)
Ho
no
rari
um
rate
/ sessio
n (
H)
No
. o
f g
rou
ps
(G
)
To
tal
h
on
or
raru
im
(EX
FX
G)
= H
Tra
ns
po
rt
su
pp
ort
(I)
To
tal
Tra
ns
po
rt
(BxI)
= J
Ven
ue
ch
arg
e (
K)
Mis
c. (L
)
GR
AN
D
TO
TA
L=
(D+
H+
J+
K+
L)
(Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.)
1. Training on Plantation Activities Water Management Group (WMG) Members
40 =(M 30 + F 10) 200 40 2 16000 10 400 2 8000 100 4000 300 500 28800
2. Vegetables Gardening -ditto- 50 =(M 0 + F 50) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800
3. Fruit Trees (Quick growing) Plantation
-ditto- 50 =(M 0 + F5 0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800
4. Seed Production Technology Water Management Group (WMG) Members
50 =(M 40 + F 10) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800
6. Compost Preparation -ditto- 50 =(M 40 + F 10) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800
FY 2010-11
TOTAL 240 10 96000 10 40000 24000 1500 2500 164000
1. Fertilizer Management Water Management Group (WMG) Members
50 =(M5 0 + F 0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800
2. Winter Vegetables Production -ditto- 50 =(M 40 + F1 0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800
3. Integrated Crop Management (ICM)
Water Management Group (WMG) Members
50 =(M5 0 + F 0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 16
4. Compost Preparation -ditto- 40 =(M 40 + F 10) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800
FY 2011-12
TOTAL 200 8 80000 8 32000 20000 1200 2000 135200
1. Fruit Trees Management WMG Committee Members and other Beneficiaries
50=(M50+F0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800
2. Fertilizer Management -ditto- 50=(M50+F0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800
3. Water Management for Boro -ditto- 50=(M50+F0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800
4. Pest Control for Winter Vegetables
-ditto- 50=(M50+F0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800
5. Post-harvest Technology of Rice
-ditto- 50=(M0+F50) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800
FY 2012-13
TOTAL 250 10 100000 10 40000 25000 1500 2500 169000
Summery of cost for Training :
1. Cost for the FY 2010-11 =Tk. 1,64,000/-
2. Cost for the FY 2011-12 =Tk 1,35,200/-
3. Cost for the FY 2012-13 =Tk. 1,69,000/-
Total Tk.4,68,200/-(Total Taka Four lacks sixty eitht thousand two hundred only)
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 17
2.3 Agricultural Fairs
Agricultural fair is one of the most important and effective method which disseminate modern
technology at the shortest possible time. It helps the people as well as farmers to know the
latest agricultural technologies. Agricultural fair also creates a liaison with other development
organizations. The objectives of the fair is to disseminate agricultural technologies of the
farmers in a short time.
At least one agricultural fair will be arranged annually at the Sub-unit area during winter season.
- Budget for one agricultural fair will be Tk 80,000/-
- One agricultural fair will be organized in each SIP area where the farmers will be able
to show and see different products
2.4 Farmers’ Motivational Tours
Motivational Tour is another aspect to enrich the farmers knowledge by sharing their
experiences with other successful farmers and visits to renowned agricultural research
and development institutes
Budget for one batch of Motivational Tour will be Tk. 75,000/-(approx)
- Motivational Tour will be conducted in batch of 30 farmers .
- One batch of farmers (30) will be selected from each SIP area.
2.5 Nursery Development
Agriculture Nursery is another tool for dissemination of different extension messages. Major
objectives of the nursery will be to enhance production of vegetables, spices and fruits, and
thereby reduce malnutrition problem of people. Farmers will be able to purchase seed, saplings
and seedlings of the above noted items from the nursery at reasonable price. They will be also
able to receive free advice from the DAE staff for establishment of nursery.
At least one nursery need to be established in each SIP. A complete guideline will have to be
prepared for management of the nursery by the Resource persons. The cost of all inputs will
be borne by the project.
The total cost per nursery may be estimated at Tk.75,000/-(approx).
2.6 Total cost
Total cost of expenditures for Agricultural activities in the SIP for the entire Project period will be
as per following break-up:
a. Total Demonstration cos = Tk. 7,06,500/-
b. Total Training cost = Tk. 4,68,200/-
c. Cost for Motivational Tour = Tk. 75,000/-
d. Cost for Agricultural Fair = Tk. 80,000/-
e. Cost for Nursery Development = Tk. 75,000/-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL = Tk.14,04,700/-
(Total Taka Fourteen lacs four thousand seven hundred will be spent for
different agricultural activities at the SIP area)
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 18
2.7 Summary of Future Agricultural Activities:
For undertaking the agricultural development activities for SIP # 16, a schedule has been
prepared to implement those activities in the form of Bar diagram.
Items 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
a) 1. Farmers’ Training b)
2.Demonstrations of crops & varieties
3.Farmers’ Motivational Tours
4.Agricultural Fair
5.Seed production activities
6 Nursery Development
7. Devt. of Marketing Facilities
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 19
3.0 Collective Action Plan (CAP) During FGDs, following initiatives were recorded from the WMG-members and they are agreed
to work collectively under the supervision of the Senior Facilitators and Community Facilitators
which can be summarized by the following Table:
WMG Name/No./
Village.
List of Initiatives Training topics Remarks
Chameli/
S-18/1/
Dariaghata,
Fuldah
1.Soil testing
2.Water salinity test
3.Procurement of quality Seeds
and Fertilizers
4.Establish demonstration plots
5.Practice Integrated Pest/Crop
Management ( IPM/ICM)
6.Cultivation of High Value
Crops
(HVCs).
7. Collective Marketing.
a. Compost preparation
b. Fertilizer and Water
Management
c. Vegetables production
d.IPM/ICM
e. Soybean production
f. Seed preservation
g. Nursery development,
Beli /
S-18/2/
Amtola
1.Soil testing
2.Water salinity test
3.Procurement of quality Seeds
and Fertilizers
4.Establish demonstration plots
5.Practice Integrated Pest/Crop
Management ( IPM/ICM)
6.Cultivation of High Value
Crops
(HVCs).
a. Compost preparation
b. Fertilizer and Water
management
c. Vegetables
production
d.IPM/ICM
e. Soybean production
Keya/
S-18/3
Kalamonkhali,
Bajebabra
1.Soil testing
2.Water salinity test
3.Procurement of quality Seeds
and Fertilizers
4.Establish demonstration plots
5.Practice Integrated Pest/Crop
Management ( IPM/ICM)
6. Vegetables Production.
a. Vegetables production
b.IPM/ICM
c. Soybean production
d. Seed preservation
e. Nursery development,
Nabaganga/
S-18/4
Noagram
1.Soil testing
2.Water salinity test
3.Procurement of quality Seeds
and Fertilizers
4.Establish demonstration plots
5.Practice Integrated Pest/Crop
Management ( IPM/ICM)
6.Cultivation of High Value
Crops
(HVCs).
7.Collective Marketing.
a. Compost preparation
b. Fertilizer and Water
management
c.. Vegetables
production
d.IPM/ICM
e. Soybean production
f. Seed preservation
g. Nursery development,
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 20
Ekata/
S-18/5
Diadanga
1.Soil testing
2.Water salinity test
3.Procurement of quality Seeds
and Fertilizers
4.Establish demonstration plots
5.Practice Integrated Pest/Crop
Management ( IPM/ICM)
6.Cultivation of High Value
Crops
(HVCs).
7.Collective Marketing.
a. Compost preparation
b. Fertilizer and Water
management
c.. Vegetables
production
d.IPM/ICM
e. Soybean production
f. Seed preservation
g. Nursery development,
Suravi/
S-18/5A
Perbishnupur
1.Soil testing
2.Water salinity test
3.Procurement of quality Seeds
and Fertilizers
4.Establish demonstration plots
5.Practice Integrated Pest/Crop
Management ( IPM/ICM)
6. Collective Marketing.
a. Compost preparation
b. Fertilizer and Water
management
c.. Vegetables
production
d.IPM/ICM
e. Soybean production
f. Seed preservation
Hasnahena/
S-18/6
Burikhali
1.Soil testing
2.Water salinity test
3.Procurement of quality Seeds
and Fertilizers
4.Establish demonstration plots
5.Practice Integrated Pest/Crop
Management ( IPM/ICM)
6.Collective Marketing.
a. Compost preparation
b. Fertilizer and Water
management
c.. Vegetables
production
d.IPM/ICM
e. Soybean production
f. Seed preservation
g. Nursery development,
Rajanigandha/
S-18/6A
Pervumbag
1.Soil testing
2.Water salinity test
3.Procurement of quality Seeds
and Fertilizers
4.Establish demonstration plots
5.Practice Integrated Pest/Crop
Management ( IPM/ICM)
6.Cultivation of High Value
Crops
(HVCs).
7. Collective Marketing.
a. Compost preparation
b. Fertilizer and Water
management
c.. Vegetables
production
d.IPM/ICM
e. Soybean production
f. Nursery development,
Kanakchapa/
S-18/7
Perulistan
1.Soil testing
2.Water salinity test
3.Procurement of quality Seeds
and Fertilizers
4.Establish demonstration plots
5.Practice Integrated Pest/Crop
Management ( IPM/ICM)
a. Compost preparation
b. Fertilizer and Water
management
c.. Vegetables
production
d.IPM/ICM
e. Soybean production
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 21
6.Cultivation of High Value
Crops
(HVCs).
7.Collective Marketing.
f. Seed preservation
g. Nursery development,
Gandharaj/
S-18/8
Satbaria,Pateswari
1.Soil testing
2.Water salinity test
3.Procurement of quality Seeds
and Fertilizers
4.Establish demonstration plots
5.Practice Integrated Pest/Crop
Management ( IPM/ICM)
6.Collective Marketing.
a. Compost preparation
b. Fertilizer and Water
management
c.. Vegetables
production
d.IPM/ICM
e. Soybean production
f. Nursery development,
N0tes:
‘CAP’ Opportunities explored by WMG –members: After organizing Focus Group
Discussions (FGD) with the Water Management Group (WMG) members, following activities
have been identified in order to implement with the initiatives of the WMG-members
collectively.
1. Soil testing:- WMG- members given the responsibilities to the Agriculture sub-
committee to test their soil in order to have ideas about acidity, alkalinity, soil PH. and
other nutritional status of soil.
Agriculture sub-committee of the WMG will collect soil samples from the interested
farmers’ field with the assistance of the Facilitator and take necessary measures to test
the soil by the Department of Agricultural Extension(DAE) or Soil survey Resources
Institute(SRDI).
In doing so, Farmers will be able to select different crops and varieties suitable for their
land. They will discuss the results of soil testing In WMG-meetings and plan their crops
to be cultivated during the next season.
Further, through soil testing, the nutritional condition of the soil especially the macro-
nutrients (N,P,K,Zn) status can be measured and Farmers will be able to plan for
recommended fertilizer doses for different crops.
2. Water salinity test:- Each WMA will be provided with a water salinity test kit by which
WMG-members will be able to test water of their locality in order to know the salinity
level. After knowing the salinity level during the pick-time of the season ,they can decide
to cultivate some saline –tolerant varieties of rice. Thus Farmers can mitigate the crop
losses.
3. Procurement of quality Seeds and Fertilizers:-Agriculture sub-committee of the WMG
will explore the seasonal requirements of seeds and fertilizers for a season and communicate
with the respective organizations (like BADC, DAE, commercial seeds and fertilizer
agencies, etc.) by providing indent ahead of time. They will take delivery of the materials
centrally on behalf of the WMG and distribute the same to the WMG-beneficiaries according
to their requirement. Thus individual carrying costs can be minimized and less chance of
adulteration of inputs could be ensured.
Through discussions and decisions at WMG-meetings, they can use the WMG –fund for
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 22
the procurement of required inputs. Thus, Farmers can get the inputs timely and with the
reasonable prices at their door-steps.
Further, some of the WMG will try to allocate Seeds and Fertilizer sub-dealership from the
Govt. organizations.
4.Establish demonstration plots: Project will conduct some demonstrations at the Farmers’
field in introducing new crops and varieties. WMG will adopt those with the technical
assistance from DAE and Project. WMG decide in the meeting to materialize the program
through sub-groups by taking lease of land and sharing the benefits by the WMG –
members. In this way, farmers will be able to know the technology jointly and economic
benefits. Through demonstrations, new technology will be adopted and practiced in the area.
Collective demonstrations by the WMG-members will be encouraged.
5.Practice Integrated Pest/Crop Management ( IPM/ICM):-WMG-members will decide
collectively for not using any pesticides in their crop field. It is rarely impossible to practice
IPM/ICM individually ,it must be a collective effort. WMG-members will decide at which
area and which crop field will be taken for IPM/ICM. By practicing IPM/ICM, Farmers can
reduce the cost of cultivation without using insecticides in the crop field. Thus, the produced
crops will be considered as non-hazardous for human consumption.
6. Cultivation of High Value Crops (HVCs): Some vegetables, Maize, Soybean are being
considered as HVCs which can be introduced at the WMG-areas. As these are somewhat
new crops in the area, there might be little risk for cultivation. So, it is decided at the WMG-
meetings to cultivate some HVCs collectively on the part of WMG.
WMG can take a piece of land on lease and cultivate some HVCs and take the benefits to
WMG-fund.
7. Collective Marketing: Farmers normally sale their products individually at the nearest
markets where they generally sale at lower prices. But if the WMG take the initiatives to
collect seasonal agricultural commodities and store at the custody of the Executive
Committee and communicate with the wholesale/retail markets and bargain with them
for higher prices. Thus, by collective marketing, individual farmers can get better prices
at a time and can plan for next season’s cropping practices.
Topics of Training asked by the WMG-members: The following training topics were
selected by the WMG –members thr4ough which they can be equipped with knowledge and
techniques for better agr4icultural production:-
a. Compost preparation
b. Fertilizer and Water management
c. Vegetables production
d. IPM/ICM
e. Soybean production
f. Seed preservation
g. Nursery development, etc.
Training modules will be developed and supplied to the participants during the training
programs.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 23
List of topics for Training Modules: 1. Integrated Pest/Crop Management (IPM/ICM).
2. Soybean Production.
3. Maize Production.
4. Aromatic Rice(BRRI dhan-50- Banglamoti).
5. Summer Tomato.
6. Saline tolerant Rice (BRRI dhan-47).
7. Methods of Agricultural Extension and Communication with Farmers.
8. Winter Vegetables Cultivation.
9. Fruit Trees Nursery Development.
10. Rice-cum-Fish Culture.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 1
Noagram-Gajaria Scheme (SWC-17 + 18)
Agriculture Summary
The gross area of SWC-17 + 18 is 1471 ha. According to PPTA net cultivable area (NCA) has
been estimated at 70% of the gross area for Chenchuri Beel Sub-Project. Thus, the NCA of the
SIP is calculated at 1029 ha with a present cropped area of 2178 ha yielding a cropping
intensity of 212%. Future total cropped area has been estimated at 2569 ha with a cropping
intensity of 250%.Annual production of Cereal crops will be increased by 3286 MT after
rehabilitation. In the future Cropping Pattern, 18 % of the cropped area will be covered by High
Value Crops (HVCs).
Based on the hydrological analysis ,the land area under the SIP have been figured out as
F0,F!,F2 & F3 as per present & future governing water levels on which total cropped area,
cropping pattern, cropping intensity and total production have been estimated.
Data furnished in the report are based on the agricultural information collected from the field
(SIP area) through Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) by the Facilitators and compiled by the
Research Assistants. Moreover, for authentication, secondary data from the local DAE office
has been consulted.
A total of 10- Water Management Groups (WMGs) have already been organized & formed in
the Sub-Unit. Data for Collective Action Plan (CAP) have been collected from the WMG-
members by the Facilitators by ‘Walkthroughs’ and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs).
Present Agriculture
The present agriculture in the sub-unit is hampered by poor drainage, resulting in water logging in the lower areas during the wet season. Conversely, the higher areas suffer from water shortage especially during the pre-monsoon season. From the gathered data, it is known that 60% of the land are being irrigated through STWs and LLPs.
Present cropping pattern and production have been provided in Tables 3 and 4. Agriculture in
the sub-unit is dominated by rice cultivation covering over 50% of the total cropped area
followed by jute (19%), wheat(12%), mustard (11%) and pulses (8%)
Present production of major crops (cereals) have been calculated as 3581 metric tonnes of
which rice is 3057 MT and 524 MT of wheat is produced annually.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 2
Future Agriculture
Future cropping pattern and production have been provided in Tables 5 and 6. Future
agriculture under changed scenario, shows that cereal crops (rice, maize and wheat)will cover
72% of the total cropped area followed by Jute (9%),Vegetables(7%), Soybean (7%), and
Oilseeds (5%) with an estimated cropping intensity of 250% and total cropped area of 2569 ha.
In the future Cropping Pattern, 18 % of the cropped area will be covered by High Value Crops
(HVCs).
Annual production of major crops (cereals) have been estimated as 6867 MT of which rice will
be 5761 MT ,Maize will be 666 MT and wheat will be 440 MT. Thus, annual Cereal production
of the Sub-Unit has been estimated to be increased by 3286 MT after rehabilitation.
To facilitate this shift the DAE,NGOs and the Project will provide extension support to the
farmers in the form of improved agricultural techniques, integrated pest/crop management,
home gardening (for women), etc. Detailed agricultural activities for the SIP have been
furnished along with the estimated budget provisions in the form of training, demonstrations,
agricultural fairs, motivational tours, nursery development, etc . Further, a Bar diagram has
been shown to spell out various activities for agricultural development in the Sub-Unit area
throughout the entire Project period.
A budget has been reserved for an amount of BDT 60.55 million for the agricultural program for
total project under implementation. The agricultural development (enhancement) activities of
the SIP have been estimated at BDT 14 lacs for the entire Project period.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 3
1.0 Description
The gross area of SWC 17 +18 is 1471 ha. According to PPTA net cultivable area (NCA) has
been estimated at 70% of the gross area for Chenchur beel Sub-Project. Thus, the NCA is
calculated at 1029 ha with a present cropped area of 2178 ha yielding a cropping intensity of
212%.Future total cropped area has been estimated at 2569 ha with a cropping intensity of
250%. Production of Cereal crops will be increased by 3286 MT after rehabilitation. . In the
future Cropping Pattern, 18 % of the cropped area will be covered by High Value Crops
(HVCs).
Based on the hydrological analysis, the land area under the SIP have been figured out as
F0,F!,F2 & F3 as per present & future governing water levels on which total cropped area,
cropping pattern, cropping intensity and total production have been estimated.
Data furnished in the report are based on the agriculture information collected from the field
through Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) by the Facilitators and compiled by the Research
Assistants. Moreover, for authentication, the secondary data from the local DAE office have
been consulted.
A total of 10-Water Management Groups (WMGs) have already been organized & formed in
the Sub- Unit. Data for Collective Action Plan (CAP) have been collected by the Facilitators
from the WMG-members during FGDs.
1.1 Present Agriculture
The Tables and items below are the compiled information on the agricultural data of the SIP,
which to be considered as Present Agriculture:
Table-1: Crops & Varieties cultivated during various seasons
Seasons Crops Crops & Varieties
Rabi Kharif-1 Kharif-II
Paddy Wheat Pulse Mustard Paddy Jute Paddy
Boro: HYV – BRRI dhan 28, BRRI dhan 29. Hybrid – Hira, ,ACI, ,Laltir, ,etc. Aus: Ratul, Ratna, Buri ,Gambhur--local varieties. HYV Aman: BR-11 Aman: Jabra, Hori, ,,Manohar,Sona Digha, Lal Digha-- Local varieties.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 4
Table-2: Yield of Major crops/ha.
Crops Variety Average Yield per ha(MT)
Paddy Aus (Local) 1.2
Aman (Local) 1.5
HYV Boro 5.0
Hybrid Boro 5.5
Pulse 2.8
Mustard 1.5
Wheat 2.0
Jute 2.5
The present agriculture in the sub-unit is hampered by poor drainage, resulting in water logging in the lower areas during the wet season. Conversely, the higher areas suffer from water shortage especially during the pre-monsoon season. From the gathered data, it is known that 60% of the land are being irrigated through STWs and LLPs.
Present cropping pattern and production have been provided in Tables 3 and 4. Agriculture in
the sub-unit is dominated by rice cultivation covering over 50% of the total cropped area
followed by jute(19%), wheat(12%), mustard (11%) and pulses (8%)
Present production of major crops (cereals) have been calculated as 3581 metric tonnes of
which rice is 3057 and 524 metric tonnes of wheat is produced annually.
Table - 3 : Present Cropping Pattern by Land Type
Land type and flood
depth
Cropping Pattern No. of Crop
Net area (ha)
Cropped area (ha) Rabi Kharif - I Kharif - II
FO (0 - 30 cm)
Pulses B.Aus HYV T. Aman 3 70 210
HYV Boro Jute 2 153 306
Wheat Jute 2 162 324
Mustard B.Aus LT.Aman 3 50 150
Sub-total 435 990
F1 (31 - 90 cm)
Wheat Jute 2 100 200
Pulses B.Aus 2 113 226
Hybrid Boro
LT. Aman 2 69 138
Mustard B.Aus 2 92 184
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 5
Sub-total 374 748
F2 (91 - 180 cm)
HYV Boro B.Aman Cont’d 2 120 240
Mustard B.Aman Cont’d 2 100 200
Sub-total 220 440
Grand Total 1029 2178
Cropping Intensity - 212%
Table - 4 furnishes the existing crop wise area, yield and total production which need to be improved
through the required development of infrastructures, re-excavation of khals etc. through which
agricultural production will obviously by increased.
Table - 4: Present Position : Crops with their production by Land Type
Total Cropped
area
Net cultivated
area
Cropping intensity Land type and
flood depth Name of
Crop Area (ha)
Average Yield
Total productio
n
(ha) (ha) (%) (mt/ha) (mt)
2178 1029 212
FO (0 - 30 cm)
Pulses 70 2.8 196
Jute 315 2.5 787.5
HYV Boro 153 5.0 765
HYV T. Aman
120 3.5 420
B.Aus 120 1.2 144
Wheat 162 2 324
Mustard 50 1.5 75
Sub-total 990 2711.5
F1 (31 - 90cm)
Wheat 100 2 200
Pulses 113 2.8 316.4
Jute 100 2.5 250
B.Aus 205 1.2 246
Hybrid Boro 69 5.5 379.5
LT.Aman 69 2.5 172.5
Mustard 92 1.5 138
Sub-total 748 1702.4
F2 B.Aman 220 1.5 330
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 6
(91 - 180 cm)
HYV Boro 120 5.0 600
Mustard 100 1.5 150
Sub-total 440 1080
2178 1029 212 Grand Total 2178 5493.9
Present annual rice production has been calculated as 3057 MT and wheat as 524 MT. Thus, annual Cereal production is 3581 MT.
Extracts from the collected Data: Regarding availability of seeds, most of the farmers have opined that the condition is good. Following steps could be taken for better availability of seeds.
1.1.1 Steps for seed availability
1. Own collection.
2. Farmers should get directly from the Government.
3. Supplying of good seed by BADC.
4. To arrange training on production and preservation of seed.
1.1.2 Irrigation Facilities From the gathered data, it is known that 60% of the land are being irrigated through STWs and LLPs.
1.1.2.a Problems of using irrigation facilities
1. Water scarcity in the khals during draught period. 2. Saline water enter into the field during Mid-March to April and damages Boro rice. 3. Inactive regulator/Sluice gates in the khals. 4. Excessive siltation in the khals. 5. Poor drainage facilities. 6. Number of STWs is inadequate as per requirement. 7. Low water discharge through Swallow Tube Well during dry season.
For further expansion of irrigation facilities, following points may be taken into consideration.
1.1.2.b Steps to improve irrigation facilities
1. Immediate repairing of existing regulator or reinstallation of new regulator. 2. Re-excavation of existing khals to easy and quick drain out of water from the field. 3. Excavation of new khals. 4. Supply of electricity for irrigation. 5. Deposition of pure water for irrigation.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 7
1.1.3.a Water Salinity
In the SIP- area, there exists some amount of water salinity but within permissible limit upto end of February.
1.1.3.b Ways to mitigate Water Salinity
To check the entrance of saline water from the river into the khals by repairing or installing regulators.
Use of saline tolerant rice varieties.
Embankment need to be repaired.
To test water salinity regularly.
Use of zypsum fertilizer.
.1.4.a Soil salinity
Soil of the SIP-area are quite fertile and responsive to addition of fertilizers as per characteristics of Gangetic alluvium. There is a complain of soil salinity problem at the lower areas- beel areas.
1.1.4.b Ways to mitigate soil salinity
Awareness raising among the farmers
Soil testing in field as per farmers’ demand
Cultivation of salinity tolerant rice varieties
Check the entrance of saline water from the river into the khals by repairing or installing regulators
Embankment to be repaired
Use of zypsum fertilizer.
1.1.5.a Extent of Fertilizer Use
Farmers are generally using over and imbalanced doses of chemical Fertilizers because of lack of adequate knowledge about proper doses of Fertilizers requiring training on crop-wise Fertilizers application.
Farmers are not also using Compost/Organic Fertilizers.
1.1.5.b Reasons for not using Compost/Organic Fertilizers
Lack of domestic animals/cows.
Cow dung is used as fuel due to scarcity of firewood.
Less awareness and lack of knowledge of Compost preparation
Farmers have no ideas about Green manure.
1.1.6.a Use of Insecticides
Farmers are using moderate doses of insecticides. They do not possess adequate knowledge on the required doses of insecticides application.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 8
1.1.6.b Practice of IPM/ICM by the Farmers
Farmers have little knowledge on IPM/ICM .Extension activities in this regard needs to be geared up.:
1.1.7.a Training topics for the Farmers
1. Compost Preparation & Green manuring 2. Fertilizer and Water Management. 3. Cultivation of HYV Rice
4. IPM/ICM
5. Soil testing
6. Water salinity testing
7. Nursery development
8. Vegetables Production
1.1.7.b Training topics for Women
1. Homestead Gardening
2. Poultry rearing
3. Seed preservation
4. Goat & Cow rearing.
The following problems are being identified which hamper better crop production. If these
problems could be solved, more production could be achieved.
1.1.8.a Problems of crop production
1. Water logging.
2. Soil salinity
3. Water salinity
4. Lack of awareness on modern technology of agriculture development
5. High price of inputs
6. Lack of good quality of seeds
7. Proper Water management
8. Marketing facilities.
Following points need to be considered to mitigate the production problems through the project
activities and regular programme of DAE.
1.1.8.b Steps to mitigate those problems
1. Re-excavation of canal to prevent water logging.
2. Improving the irrigation system and water management.
3. Reducing the price of diesel.
4. Reducing the price of Fertilizer.
5. Using the improved technology in agriculture development.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 9
6. Perform the duties of agricultural officers/staffs through close contact with the farmers
to make aware of soil quality, uses of seeds and fertilizers, techniques of pest control
etc. i.e. technology dissemination.
People are expecting better production and livelihood from this project. Project intervention will
hopefully fulfil their aspirations through their active participation.
1.2 Future Scenario
Future cropping pattern and production have been provided in Tables 5 and 6. Future
agriculture under changed scenario, shows that cereal crops (rice,maize and wheat) cover 72%
of total cropped area followed by Jute (9%),Vegetables(7%), Soybean (7%), and Oilseeds
(5%) with an estimated cropping intensity of 250% and total cropped area of 2569 ha. In the
future Cropping Pattern, 18 % of the cropped area will be covered by High Value Crops
(HVCs).
Annual production of major crops (cereals) have been estimated as 6867 MT of which rice will
be 5761 MT, maize will be 666 MT and wheat will be 440 MT. Thus, annual Cereal production
of the Sub-Unit has been estimated to be increased by 3286 MT after rehabilitation.
Table - 5: Future after Rehabilitation: Cropping Pattern by Land Type
Land type and flood depth
Cropping Pattern No. of Crop
Net Area (ha)
Cropped area (ha) Rabi Kharif - I Kharif - II
FO (0 - 30 cm)
Winter Vegetables
T.Aus 2 185 370
Wheat Jute HYV T. Aman 3 110 330
Soybean Maize HYV T. Aman 3 121 363
Aromatic Rice
HYV T. Aman 2 175 350
Sub-total 591 1413
F1 (31 - 90 cm)
Wheat Jute HYV T. Aman 3 110 330
HYV Boro Sesame HYV T. Aman 3 120 360
Soybean T.Aus HYV T. Aman 3 50 150
Hybrid Boro HYV T. Aman 2 100 200
Sub-total 380 1040
F2
(91-180cm) HYV Boro B.Aman Cont'd 2 58 116
Sub-total 58 116
Grand total 1029 2569
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 10
Cropping Intensity =250% Table - 6 : Future with Project Position : Crops with their Production by Land Type
Total Cropped
area
Net cultivated
area
Cropping intensity Land type and
flood depth Name of Crops
Area (ha)
Average Yield
Total production
(ha) (ha) (%) (mt/ha) (mt)
Winter Vegetables
185 17 3145
2569 1029 250
FO (0 - 30 cm)
T.Aus 185 3 370
Wheat 110 2 220
Soybean 121 2 242
Maize 121 5.5 665.5
Jute 110 2.5 270
HYV T. Aman
406 3.5 1421
Aromatic Rice
175 5.5 962.5
Sub-total 1413 7296
Wheat 110 2 220
F1 Jute 110 2.5 275
(31-90 cm) HYV T. Aman
380 3.5 1330
Hybrid Boro 100 5.5 550
Sesame 120 1.5 180
Soybean 50 2 100
T.Aus 50 3 150
HYV Boro 120 5.0 600
Sub-total 1040 3405
(91-180 cm) B.Aman 58 1.5 87
HYV Boro 58 5.0 290
Sub-total 116 377
2569 1029 250 Grand total 2569 1178
Future cereal production has been estimated as 6867 MT of which rice will be 5761MT,Maize will be 666 MT and wheat will be 440 MT. Present cereal production has been calculated at 3581 MT. Thus, annual cereal production will be increased by 3286 MT.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 11
2.0 Future Agricultural Development Programs
After collecting, compiling and analysing the data based on existing agriculture conditions and
discussions with the farmers of the sub-unit; Following agricultural development programs have
been planned for implementation by the project.
2.1 Demonstration Programs
Demonstration is an important method for rapid extension of improved agro-technology of
various crops. Major objective of the demonstration is to introduce new crops and improved
technology with a view to increasing productivity and thereby income generation of farmers.
Modern varieties of crops and other technologies developed by various National Agricultural
Researches(NARs)Institutes are disseminated to farmers through demonstration. The
extension of Agricultural Services should be widely facilitated so that farmers can obtain advice
and support when they want to try new crops to increase cropping intensity and production.
Demonstration farms/trials plots will be established in sub-project area.
Following detailed Demonstration Programs have been formulated for the SIP for the
entire Project period.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 12
echnology Demonstrations for FY, 2010-11, 2011-2012,2012-13 (for 3- years):
Technology
Units Farmers Number Unit Cost Demo.
Cost (Tk.) Cost for field
day (Tk.)
Remuneration for the
Supervising Officer (Tk.)*
Total Cost (Tk.)
No. Area Male Female (Tk.)
1. Demo. on compost preparation 3 Nos. 1 dcm. each 2 1 3000 9000 5000 each for 100 farmers
3000 per demo.
33000
3. Demonstration of Urea Super Granules (GUTI’ Urea) to Boro
10 Nos. 33 dcm. each
10 - 2500 25000 5000 each for 100 farmers
3000 per demo.
105000
5. Demonstration on Sex Pheromones 10 Nos. 33 dcm. each
7 3 3000 30000 5000 each for 100 farmers
3,000 per demo
110000
FY 2009-10
TOTAL 23 Nos. 19 4 64000 248000
2. Varietal Demo. of Wheat (BR-42, Bijoy, Prodip)
5 Nos. 33 dcm. each
5 - 3000 15000 5000 each for 100 farmers
3000 per demo 55000
3. Demonstration of Maize Production 12 Nos. 33 dcm. each
12 - 5000 60000 5000 each for 100 farmers
3000 per demo 156000
4. Demonstration of Mustard (BARI-6) 10 Nos. 33 dcm. each
10 - 2500 25000 5000 each for 100 farmers
3000 per demo 105000
FY 2010-11
TOTAL 27 Nos. 27 100000 316000
1. Varietal Demo. of Boro (BR-47) 4 Nos. 33 dcm. each
4 - 2500 10000 5000 each for 100 farmers
3000 per demo 42000
2. Demonstration of Soybean Production 10 Nos. 33 dcm. each
5 5 2000 20000 5000 each for 100 farmers
3000 per demo 100000
FY 2011-12
TOTAL 14 Nos. 9 5 30,000 142,000
* One field level officer will supervise each demonstration intensively throughout the whole crop season (approx. 3-months). Summery of cost for Demonstration : 1. Cost for the FY 2010-11=Tk.2,48,,000/- 2. Cost for the FY 2011-12= Tk 3,16,500/- 3. Cost for the FY 2012-13 =Tk. 1,42000/-
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 13
Total Tk. 7,06,500/-( Total Taka Seven lacs six thousand five hundred only).
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 14
2.2 Training programs for farmers
Human resources development through training of farmers, officials and trainers will be
provided under the Agricultural Extension Component.
The farmers will be trained by DAE/Livestock/Fishery staff after getting TOT from the Project.
Training will be provided to the farmers for integrated pest management to minimize the
negative impact of agro-chemicals on the environment. The use of compost will also reduce the
possible negative impacts agro-chemicals on the environment. Agricultural extension focusing
on home gardens and livestock to women for increased production of vegetables will be
provided.
A detailed Training Plan along with the cost estimates have been formulated for
the beneficiaries of the SIP is presented as follows:
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 15
Detailed Costing of Training for FY, 2010-11, 2011-2012,2012-13 (for 3- years):
Sl. No.
Topic of Training Participants Number of
Participants
Tra
inin
g A
llo
wan
ce/
da
y (
A)
No
.of
tra
ine
e (
B)
No
. o
f d
ay (
C)
Tra
inin
g A
llo
wan
ce
(to
tal)
(A
XB
XC
) =
D
No
. o
f sessio
n
(E
)
Ho
no
rari
um
rate
/ sessio
n (
H)
No
. o
f g
rou
ps
(G
)
To
tal
h
on
or
raru
im
(EX
FX
G)
= H
Tra
ns
po
rt
su
pp
ort
(I)
To
tal
Tra
ns
po
rt
(BxI)
= J
Ven
ue
ch
arg
e (
K)
Mis
c. (L
)
GR
AN
D
TO
TA
L=
(D+
H+
J+
K+
L)
(Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.)
1. Training on Plantation Activities Water Management Group (WMG) Members
40 =(M 30 + F 10) 200 40 2 16000 10 400 2 8000 100 4000 300 500 28800
2. Vegetables Gardening -ditto- 50 =(M 0 + F 50) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800
3. Fruit Trees (Quick growing) Plantation
-ditto- 50 =(M 0 + F5 0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800
4. Seed Production Technology Water Management Group (WMG) Members
50 =(M 40 + F 10) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800
6. Compost Preparation -ditto- 50 =(M 40 + F 10) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800
FY 2010-11
TOTAL 240 10 96000 10 40000 24000 1500 2500 164000
1. Fertilizer Management Water Management Group (WMG) Members
50 =(M5 0 + F 0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800
2. Winter Vegetables Production -ditto- 50 =(M 40 + F1 0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800
3. Integrated Crop Management (ICM)
Water Management Group (WMG) Members
50 =(M5 0 + F 0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 16
4. Compost Preparation -ditto- 40 =(M 40 + F 10) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800
FY 2011-12
TOTAL 200 8 80000 8 32000 20000 1200 2000 135200
1. Fruit Trees Management WMG Committee Members and other Beneficiaries
50=(M50+F0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800
2. Fertilizer Management -ditto- 50=(M50+F0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800
3. Water Management for Boro -ditto- 50=(M50+F0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800
4. Pest Control for Winter Vegetables
-ditto- 50=(M50+F0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800
5. Post-harvest Technology of Rice
-ditto- 50=(M0+F50) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800
FY 2012-13
TOTAL 250 10 100000 10 40000 25000 1500 2500 169000
Summery of cost for Training :
1. Cost for the FY 2010-11 =Tk. 1,64,000/-
2. Cost for the FY 2011-12 =Tk 1,35,200/-
3. Cost for the FY 2012-13 =Tk. 1,69,000/-
Total Tk.4,68,200/-(Total Taka Four lacks sixty eitht thousand two hundred only)
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 17
2.3 Agricultural Fairs
Agricultural fair is one of the most important and effective method which disseminate modern
technology at the shortest possible time. It helps the people as well as farmers to know the
latest agricultural technologies. Agricultural fair also creates a liaison with other development
organizations. The objectives of the fair is to disseminate agricultural technologies of the
farmers in a short time.
At least one agricultural fair will be arranged annually at the Sub-unit area during winter season.
- Budget for one agricultural fair will be Tk 80,000/-
- One agricultural fair will be organized in each SIP area where the farmers will be able
to show and see different products
2.4 Farmers’ Motivational Tours
Motivational Tour is another aspect to enrich the farmers knowledge by sharing their
experiences with other successful farmers and visits to renowned agricultural research
and development institutes
Budget for one batch of Motivational Tour will be Tk. 75,000/-(approx)
- Motivational Tour will be conducted in batch of 30 farmers .
- One batch of farmers (30) will be selected from each SIP area.
2.5 Nursery Development
Agriculture Nursery is another tool for dissemination of different extension messages. Major
objectives of the nursery will be to enhance production of vegetables, spices and fruits, and
thereby reduce malnutrition problem of people. Farmers will be able to purchase seed, saplings
and seedlings of the above noted items from the nursery at reasonable price. They will be also
able to receive free advice from the DAE staff for establishment of nursery.
At least one nursery need to be established in each SIP. A complete guideline will have to be
prepared for management of the nursery by the Resource persons. The cost of all inputs will
be borne by the project.
The total cost per nursery may be estimated at Tk.75,000/-(approx).
2.6 Total cost
Total cost of expenditures for Agricultural activities in the SIP for the entire Project period will be
as per following break-up:
a. Total Demonstration cos = Tk. 7,06,500/-
b. Total Training cost = Tk. 4,68,200/-
c. Cost for Motivational Tour = Tk. 75,000/-
d. Cost for Agricultural Fair = Tk. 80,000/-
e. Cost for Nursery Development = Tk. 75,000/-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL = Tk.14,04,700/-
(Total Taka Fourteen lacs four thousand seven hundred will be spent for
different agricultural activities at the SIP area)
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 18
2.7 Summary of Future Agricultural Activities:
For undertaking the agricultural development activities for SIP # 16, a schedule has been
prepared to implement those activities in the form of Bar diagram.
Items 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
a) 1. Farmers’ Training b)
2.Demonstrations of crops & varieties
3.Farmers’ Motivational Tours
4.Agricultural Fair
5.Seed production activities
6 Nursery Development
7. Devt. of Marketing Facilities
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 19
3.0 Collective Action Plan (CAP) During FGDs, following initiatives were recorded from the WMG-members and they are agreed
to work collectively under the supervision of the Senior Facilitators and Community Facilitators
which can be summarized by the following Table:
WMG Name/No./
Village.
List of Initiatives Training topics Remarks
Chameli/
S-18/1/
Dariaghata,
Fuldah
1.Soil testing
2.Water salinity test
3.Procurement of quality Seeds
and Fertilizers
4.Establish demonstration plots
5.Practice Integrated Pest/Crop
Management ( IPM/ICM)
6.Cultivation of High Value
Crops
(HVCs).
7. Collective Marketing.
a. Compost preparation
b. Fertilizer and Water
Management
c. Vegetables production
d.IPM/ICM
e. Soybean production
f. Seed preservation
g. Nursery development,
Beli /
S-18/2/
Amtola
1.Soil testing
2.Water salinity test
3.Procurement of quality Seeds
and Fertilizers
4.Establish demonstration plots
5.Practice Integrated Pest/Crop
Management ( IPM/ICM)
6.Cultivation of High Value
Crops
(HVCs).
a. Compost preparation
b. Fertilizer and Water
management
c. Vegetables
production
d.IPM/ICM
e. Soybean production
Keya/
S-18/3
Kalamonkhali,
Bajebabra
1.Soil testing
2.Water salinity test
3.Procurement of quality Seeds
and Fertilizers
4.Establish demonstration plots
5.Practice Integrated Pest/Crop
Management ( IPM/ICM)
6. Vegetables Production.
a. Vegetables production
b.IPM/ICM
c. Soybean production
d. Seed preservation
e. Nursery development,
Nabaganga/
S-18/4
Noagram
1.Soil testing
2.Water salinity test
3.Procurement of quality Seeds
and Fertilizers
4.Establish demonstration plots
5.Practice Integrated Pest/Crop
Management ( IPM/ICM)
6.Cultivation of High Value
Crops
(HVCs).
7.Collective Marketing.
a. Compost preparation
b. Fertilizer and Water
management
c.. Vegetables
production
d.IPM/ICM
e. Soybean production
f. Seed preservation
g. Nursery development,
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 20
Ekata/
S-18/5
Diadanga
1.Soil testing
2.Water salinity test
3.Procurement of quality Seeds
and Fertilizers
4.Establish demonstration plots
5.Practice Integrated Pest/Crop
Management ( IPM/ICM)
6.Cultivation of High Value
Crops
(HVCs).
7.Collective Marketing.
a. Compost preparation
b. Fertilizer and Water
management
c.. Vegetables
production
d.IPM/ICM
e. Soybean production
f. Seed preservation
g. Nursery development,
Suravi/
S-18/5A
Perbishnupur
1.Soil testing
2.Water salinity test
3.Procurement of quality Seeds
and Fertilizers
4.Establish demonstration plots
5.Practice Integrated Pest/Crop
Management ( IPM/ICM)
6. Collective Marketing.
a. Compost preparation
b. Fertilizer and Water
management
c.. Vegetables
production
d.IPM/ICM
e. Soybean production
f. Seed preservation
Hasnahena/
S-18/6
Burikhali
1.Soil testing
2.Water salinity test
3.Procurement of quality Seeds
and Fertilizers
4.Establish demonstration plots
5.Practice Integrated Pest/Crop
Management ( IPM/ICM)
6.Collective Marketing.
a. Compost preparation
b. Fertilizer and Water
management
c.. Vegetables
production
d.IPM/ICM
e. Soybean production
f. Seed preservation
g. Nursery development,
Rajanigandha/
S-18/6A
Pervumbag
1.Soil testing
2.Water salinity test
3.Procurement of quality Seeds
and Fertilizers
4.Establish demonstration plots
5.Practice Integrated Pest/Crop
Management ( IPM/ICM)
6.Cultivation of High Value
Crops
(HVCs).
7. Collective Marketing.
a. Compost preparation
b. Fertilizer and Water
management
c.. Vegetables
production
d.IPM/ICM
e. Soybean production
f. Nursery development,
Kanakchapa/
S-18/7
Perulistan
1.Soil testing
2.Water salinity test
3.Procurement of quality Seeds
and Fertilizers
4.Establish demonstration plots
5.Practice Integrated Pest/Crop
Management ( IPM/ICM)
a. Compost preparation
b. Fertilizer and Water
management
c.. Vegetables
production
d.IPM/ICM
e. Soybean production
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 21
6.Cultivation of High Value
Crops
(HVCs).
7.Collective Marketing.
f. Seed preservation
g. Nursery development,
Gandharaj/
S-18/8
Satbaria,Pateswari
1.Soil testing
2.Water salinity test
3.Procurement of quality Seeds
and Fertilizers
4.Establish demonstration plots
5.Practice Integrated Pest/Crop
Management ( IPM/ICM)
6.Collective Marketing.
a. Compost preparation
b. Fertilizer and Water
management
c.. Vegetables
production
d.IPM/ICM
e. Soybean production
f. Nursery development,
N0tes:
‘CAP’ Opportunities explored by WMG –members: After organizing Focus Group
Discussions (FGD) with the Water Management Group (WMG) members, following activities
have been identified in order to implement with the initiatives of the WMG-members
collectively.
1. Soil testing:- WMG- members given the responsibilities to the Agriculture sub-
committee to test their soil in order to have ideas about acidity, alkalinity, soil PH. and
other nutritional status of soil.
Agriculture sub-committee of the WMG will collect soil samples from the interested
farmers’ field with the assistance of the Facilitator and take necessary measures to test
the soil by the Department of Agricultural Extension(DAE) or Soil survey Resources
Institute(SRDI).
In doing so, Farmers will be able to select different crops and varieties suitable for their
land. They will discuss the results of soil testing In WMG-meetings and plan their crops
to be cultivated during the next season.
Further, through soil testing, the nutritional condition of the soil especially the macro-
nutrients (N,P,K,Zn) status can be measured and Farmers will be able to plan for
recommended fertilizer doses for different crops.
2. Water salinity test:- Each WMA will be provided with a water salinity test kit by which
WMG-members will be able to test water of their locality in order to know the salinity
level. After knowing the salinity level during the pick-time of the season ,they can decide
to cultivate some saline –tolerant varieties of rice. Thus Farmers can mitigate the crop
losses.
3. Procurement of quality Seeds and Fertilizers:-Agriculture sub-committee of the WMG
will explore the seasonal requirements of seeds and fertilizers for a season and communicate
with the respective organizations (like BADC, DAE, commercial seeds and fertilizer
agencies, etc.) by providing indent ahead of time. They will take delivery of the materials
centrally on behalf of the WMG and distribute the same to the WMG-beneficiaries according
to their requirement. Thus individual carrying costs can be minimized and less chance of
adulteration of inputs could be ensured.
Through discussions and decisions at WMG-meetings, they can use the WMG –fund for
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 22
the procurement of required inputs. Thus, Farmers can get the inputs timely and with the
reasonable prices at their door-steps.
Further, some of the WMG will try to allocate Seeds and Fertilizer sub-dealership from the
Govt. organizations.
4.Establish demonstration plots: Project will conduct some demonstrations at the Farmers’
field in introducing new crops and varieties. WMG will adopt those with the technical
assistance from DAE and Project. WMG decide in the meeting to materialize the program
through sub-groups by taking lease of land and sharing the benefits by the WMG –
members. In this way, farmers will be able to know the technology jointly and economic
benefits. Through demonstrations, new technology will be adopted and practiced in the area.
Collective demonstrations by the WMG-members will be encouraged.
5.Practice Integrated Pest/Crop Management ( IPM/ICM):-WMG-members will decide
collectively for not using any pesticides in their crop field. It is rarely impossible to practice
IPM/ICM individually ,it must be a collective effort. WMG-members will decide at which
area and which crop field will be taken for IPM/ICM. By practicing IPM/ICM, Farmers can
reduce the cost of cultivation without using insecticides in the crop field. Thus, the produced
crops will be considered as non-hazardous for human consumption.
6. Cultivation of High Value Crops (HVCs): Some vegetables, Maize, Soybean are being
considered as HVCs which can be introduced at the WMG-areas. As these are somewhat
new crops in the area, there might be little risk for cultivation. So, it is decided at the WMG-
meetings to cultivate some HVCs collectively on the part of WMG.
WMG can take a piece of land on lease and cultivate some HVCs and take the benefits to
WMG-fund.
7. Collective Marketing: Farmers normally sale their products individually at the nearest
markets where they generally sale at lower prices. But if the WMG take the initiatives to
collect seasonal agricultural commodities and store at the custody of the Executive
Committee and communicate with the wholesale/retail markets and bargain with them
for higher prices. Thus, by collective marketing, individual farmers can get better prices
at a time and can plan for next season’s cropping practices.
Topics of Training asked by the WMG-members: The following training topics were
selected by the WMG –members thr4ough which they can be equipped with knowledge and
techniques for better agr4icultural production:-
a. Compost preparation
b. Fertilizer and Water management
c. Vegetables production
d. IPM/ICM
e. Soybean production
f. Seed preservation
g. Nursery development, etc.
Training modules will be developed and supplied to the participants during the training
programs.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 23
List of topics for Training Modules: 1. Integrated Pest/Crop Management (IPM/ICM).
2. Soybean Production.
3. Maize Production.
4. Aromatic Rice(BRRI dhan-50- Banglamoti).
5. Summer Tomato.
6. Saline tolerant Rice (BRRI dhan-47).
7. Methods of Agricultural Extension and Communication with Farmers.
8. Winter Vegetables Cultivation.
9. Fruit Trees Nursery Development.
10. Rice-cum-Fish Culture.
ANNEX – B
FISHERIES
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-B
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 1
SWC-17+18, Noagram-Gazaria Scheme
FISHERIES
Summary
Traditionally FCD schemes have been designed on the basis of mainly agricultural considerations and thereby often clashed with the interests of fishermen. Beels are important breeding ground for river fish and regulators that check the flood waters entering the beel also block the way of spawning fish. To mitigate the negative effect, the gate of the regulator often used to be left ajar or intermittently opened and closed. This was at times a source of tension within/between the communities. That is why the fisheries interest are now better incorporated in the sub-unit implementation plan, and consent of concerned parties is a strict condition for implementation of the plan. The present fish production in the SIP area SWC- 17-18 can be distinguished in fish capture in (large) open water bodies, and fish culture in (smaller) ponds and gher. Captured fisheries covers about 2 fold larger area than cultured fisheries but yield is less than 5.88 times lower (Table-1). There is also a scope for Daudkandi-styled community based fisheries management practice which can significantly increase the production per unit beel area. The productivity of cultured fish in ponds in the area is only 51% of the national average, mainly because of absence of improved aquaculture know-how as evidenced by the very poor number of trained farmers. Inadequate supply of quality inputs (fertilizers, fingerlings, etc.) is another reason. Bringing the production to the national average level would require training (to be provided by DoF targeting about 10% of the farmers in the area) and quality inputs like seed fertilizer and feed (to be provided by the farmers). Presently rice-fish (gher) cultivation is being practiced but has scope for improvement, especially for the poor when introduced in the sharecroppers fields. Relatively novel is the proposal for stocking of fingerlings by poor fishermen/land less in order to sustain fishing in the beels and khals. The approach can also be used to mitigate the bio-diversity concerns by stocking endangered species, if any, in the sanctuaries and/or dug-out water bodies thereby increasing the possibility of their survival and propagation. A comprehensive conservation effort for bio-diversity is, however, above the scope of the SIP and should be taken up by DoF at the national level. Due to project intervention, area of floodplain will be reduced but production through floodplain,/ beel fish culture, canal fish culture and fry stocking in beel will be increased gradually. Economic return is mainly attributable to the big floodplain / beel area, where production cost is almost nil. Increase production (about 79 %) from culture fishery (184.91 MT in 2010-11 to 331.86 MT in 2013-14) can only be attained if the inputs given are optimal and proper training imparted.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-B
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 2
Present and Future Fisheries Current Situation The sub unit command area has both culture and capture fisheries firmly rooted in the local socio- economic life style. As apparent from table below (Table 1), culture fishery is the dominating one as far as production rate and total production are concerned although area wise capture fishery occupies more area than culture fisheries. Culture fisheries areas are relatively very small here. But rice- fish (gher) production areas are mentionable and its production is also remarkable. Local people also started fish culture in borrow pit. About 14 ha areas of borrow pits are now under culture and its production level is good sign . 75 ha areas of rice fish are also under culture and its production level is encouraging. Present total annual fish production (2010-2011) in the sub unit is estimated as 218.74 MT. In the capture fishery, only the floodplain fishery is significant as far as area and productivity are concerned.
Table 1: Present fisheries situation in the Sub-Unit SWC-17-18 command area
Fisheries
Present (July 2010-June 2011)
Area (ha)
Prod. Rate
Prodn. Value*
(kg/ha) (MT) (Lac Tk.)
A. Culture
1. Pond 70.00 1523 106.61 111.94
2. Nursery 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3. Rice-Fish (gher)** 75.00 862.00 64.65 67.88
4. FP beel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5. Baor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6. Borrow pit 14.00 975 13.65 14.33
7. Canal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
8. Pen 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
9. Cage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
10.Khas pond 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total: A 159.00 184.91 194.15
B. Capture
1. Public low land 0.00 0.00 0.00
2. Canal 8.50 92 0.78 0.98
3. Floodplain/Beel 305.00 106 32.33 40.41
4. Baor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5. Borrow Pit 4.00 180 0.72 0.76
6. Sanctuary 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
7. Beel stocking 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total: B 317.50 33.83 42.15
Total: (A+B) 476.50 218.74 236.30
* Fish Tk. 105.00/kg, Fingerling Tk.130/kg and floodplain / beel and sanctuary Tk.125 /kg , as they contain shing, magur,koi etc.(at 2010 price) ** Only fish MT: Metric ton
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-B
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 3
Culture fishery In the culture fisheries, pond fishery is always considered to be one of the most important fisheries for significant increase in total fish production and also to offset any adverse effect of FCD/I activities on natural floodplain fish production. Here, in the pond fishery, the average fish production rate, 1523 kg/ha, is very low compared to the national average (FRSS, DoF 2008-2009) which is 2,991 kg/ha, with no apparent reason to be so when one considers the water quality of the area. Either the farmers are lacking adequate technical knowledge or they are unable to use quality inputs, or may be both. No formal Beel culture is practiced although with individual initiatives pockets of low areas in the beels have completely been transformed into small ‘ghers’ or impounded water bodies. As such, these impounded water bodies have been included under culture fishery. Development of an array of local nurseries catering to the needs of local demand for quality (healthy and of required size) fingerlings is now becoming a pre-requisite for the local culture fisheries to have a strong footing. Supply of fingerlings from the local sources is not adequate. After pond, rice-fish (gher) aquaculture is the next important culture fishery in the SIP area as far as culture area is concerned. Production rate is good with scope for further improvement. This fishery can be a pro-poor activity if introduced in the share croppers’ rice field.
Capture fishery In the capture fisheries, area-wise as well as production-wise, the most important fishery is floodplain where production rate (106.32 kg/ha) is much lower than the national average (271kg/ha). Area is also considerable for increasing fish production. Canals are there with some productivity. Most of the canals are silted and require rehabilitation support not only as a measure to facilitate irrigation but also to allow natural fish to grow. The only other capture fishery presently in use in the sub-unit is in borrow pits. Borrow pits are officially supposed to belong to the BWDB/ LGED as they have constructed the embankment/ roads. Without getting any information from them, eye estimation was made and through FGD discussion present borrow pit areas and uses have been figured out. Most of the areas appeared to be under some sort of private control although these are some being used for aquaculture purpose.
Future fisheries To free the local people of the curse of mal-nourishment, they need more fish in their diet which can be made possible only by producing more fish in a sustainable way and making it affordable to poor including the fishermen and the disadvantaged people, especially the womenfolk. Considering the prevailing local situation and the potential opportunities that the project can create, a number of measures have been proposed for the production increase both in culture and capture fisheries (Table 2 below). An overall annual increase of 146.95 MT of fish from culture fishery, worth Tk. 154.30 lac, is achievable once the proposed fisheries activities are in place, at the end of the project period. The production and value increases may look insignificant. However, if one considers the fact that estimated floodplain area will become reduced, due to project interventions, by more than about 231 ha, the result is encouraging as the culture efforts not only compensate for the production loss but also result in surplus production. This production increase is largely dependent on supply of quality inputs in appropriate quantities, following the project training guideline, into the production systems. Sudden exorbitant increase of some of the inputs may significantly deter the process thereby affecting the production rate. Future annual production (2012-2013) is estimated as 350.43 MT .
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-B
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 4
Table 2: Future fisheries production scenario after the implementation of fisheries
development programme
Fisheries
Future (July 2012-June 2013)
Area (ha)
Prod. Rate
Prodn. Value*
kg/h (MT) (Lac Tk.)
A. Culture
1. Pond 72.00 2600 187.20 196.56
2. Nursery 1.70 2800 4.76 6.19
3. Rice-Fish** 75.00 1300 97.50 102.38
4. FP beel 5.00 1400 7.00 7.35
5. Baor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6. Borrow pit 15.00 2200 33.00 34.65
7. Canal 2.00 1200 2.40 2.52
8. Pen 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
9. Cage 0.00 0..00 0.00 0.00
10. Khas pond 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total: A 170.70 331.86 349.65
B. Capture
1. Public low land 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2. Canal 6.50 92 0.60 0.75
3. Floodplain/Beel 62.00 106 6.57 8.21
4. Baor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5. Borrow Pit 1.50 600 0.90 0.95
6. Sanctuary 3.00 700 2.10 2.63
7. Beel stocking 7.00 1200 8.40 8.82
Total: B 80.00 18.57 21.36
Total: (A+B) 250.70 350.43 371.01
* Fish Tk 105.00/kg, Fingerling Tk.130/kg and floodplain / beel and sanctuary Tk.125/kg , as they contain shing, magur,koi etc.(at 2010 price)
** Only fish *** Floodplain will be reduced due to project intervention and this land will be used for agriculture production especially for rice MT: Metric ton
Culture fishery If the ponds presently ‘not under culture’ (mostly new ponds) are brought under aquaculture then there is
a possibility of slight area increase (horizontal expansion of aquaculture) although some area again will
go to increased nursery. The major boost is expected from a possible significant gradual increase in pond
productivity rate – from 1523 kg/ha to 2600 kg/ha. The quality of water and soil can easily support this
increase. To achieve this feat, it will require adequate training and use of quality physical inputs including
seed, fertilizer and feed. While the project will provide the training, the farmers are required to take care of
other inputs. Participants of some of the Union Level Consultation Meetings (ULCMs) have expressed
their strong demand for required amount of inorganic fertilizers to be collected for aquaculture from the
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-B
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 5
appropriate sources and then to be distributed among the WMG members first. Training on compost
manufacture can greatly reduce the pressure on cow dung an organic fertilizer as well as the inorganic
fertilizers. This can also ensure better and maximum use of some locally available natural raw materials
while providing employment to a few poor. Another important issue is ensuring dissemination of
technological knowledge to all the local farmers including the farmers not directly trained by the project
through the trained farmers as well as the WMO.
Nursery area would be increased with a view to producing more quality fingerlings locally. And it would be
done by developing more efficient nursery operators.
An increase in rice-fish (gher) aquaculture has been proposed. A clear picture of rice field areas currently
under IPM (Integrated Pest Management) control, or would be in near future, could not be ascertained
from the local agricultural offices. But potentiality is there to increase the present production rate also to
some extent.
Some parts of the beel area can be used for the introduction of Daudkandi styled community based
fisheries management (CBFM) practices in the area which can significantly increase fish production by
organizing local people into an effective fish producing team. If properly organized, this can also be
turned into an enterprise sort of effort where even a poor man can have his/her share. Both the
Department of Fisheries and the NGOs have to take good initiatives for this to happen. But this is a
proven, time-tested practice, production can reach as high as 1400 kg/ha.
Areas under borrow pits should be brought under culture and in the process poor people, especially the
WMG Fisheries Members, should be given the borrow pits on lease. This was also a demand of the local
people expressed during the ULCMs. Project may support this effort by extending support in the form of
physical development (earthwork) and training.
Capture fishery
River fishery can hardly be benefited by the present project activities. Scope is very limited. However, fishermen and their community members need support as they constitute the bulk of hard-core poor people in the rural society. Income generating activities (IGAs) and/or alternative IGAs have been proposed for the fishermen and their family members that will include activities like net making, fish processing, etc.
Canal productivity is expected to increase as a result of canal rehabilitation processes. Participants in all the ULCMs have demanded re-excavation of various canals criss-crossing their unions. An increase in canal productivity is also expected to help floodplain production further which is very low at the moment.
Recently, fish sanctuary has established itself as an important fishery activity contributing significantly both to the fish bio-diversity and fish production. Development of an effective community management system is the key to success of this potential effort. Department of Fisheries has consolidated its techniques. Therefore, Upazila Fisheries Office coupled with the NGO presence in the project is bound to help develop the system in a sustainable manner. One sanctuary areas has been proposed which will require support in the forms of physical development and management training. The project will support the local fishermen by providing financial support for development of the sanctuary and by providing management and maintenance trainings. It will be the responsibility of the fishermen to bear maintenance costs once it is fully developed and put into operation.
Beel stocking is meant to support subsistence fishing of many local poor people which also ensures their access to natural water body and fish therein. Production is boost and sustained by fingerling stocking. No such effort was made earlier in the area and in the project a modest proposal has been included to introduce this type of fisheries activity. Experience of Fourth Fisheries Project (DoF) would be immensely useful here. Compared to the total beel area, the beel stocking area under the project may look very small.
Due to project intervention, flood land will be reduced to a great extent. And flood land will be used for agriculture production especially for HYV rice this land might have played a great role for fish production. Flood land areas also decreasing due to expansion of nursery development and rice fish culture.
Table 3 provides the total fisheries scenario in the 4 implementing years: areas, productivity and costs.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-B
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 6
Economics Economic premises
Costs and benefits calculated at December 2010 market prices.
Period covered is from July 2009 /June 2010 (the present financial year) to July 2012 / June 2013 (the concluding financial year of the project).
Financing of the fisheries activities would entail both beneficiary and project contributions. Beneficiaries will be responsible for all direct inputs cost required for fisheries production, both culture and capture.
Project contributions will cover trainings, demonstrations, exchange visits and investment supports. Training costs exclude Training Module preparation cost.
Project investment supports are all one-time offer and will cover costs for earthworks for borrow pits and beel culture, and construction of sanctuaries. All the maintenance and operational costs are to be borne by the beneficiaries.
Table 3 .: The 4-year fisheries scenario – area, productivity, value and costs involved
Fisheries
Future (July 2010-June 2011) Future (July 2012-June 2013)
Area (ha)
Prod. Prodn. Value* Cost
Area (ha)
Prod. Prodn. Value* Cost
Rate Rate
kg/ha
(MT) (Lac Tk.)
(Lac Tk.)
kg/ha (MT) (Lac Tk.)
(Lac Tk.)
A. Culture
1. Pond 70.00 1523 106.61 111.94 33.60 72.00 2600 187.20 196.56 64.80
2. Nursery 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 1.70 2800 4.76 6.19 1.63
3. Rice-Fish (gher) **
75.00 862.00
64.65 67.88 3 4.50
75.00 1300 97.50 102.38 39.22
4. FP beel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 5.00 1400 7.00 7.35 3.10
5. Baor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6. Borrow pit 14.00 975 13.65 14.33 5.60 15.00 2200 33.00 34.65 9.30
7. Canal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1200 2.40 2.52 1.22
8. Pen 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
9. Cage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0..00 0.00 0.00 0.00
10. Khas pond
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total: A 159.0
0 184.91 194.15
73.70 170.70 331.86 349.65 119.27
B. Capture
1. Public low land
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2. Canal 8.50 92 0.78 0.98
0.00 6.50 92 0.60 0.75 0.00
3. Floodplain/Beel
305.0
0
106 32.33 40.41 0.00 62.00 106 6.57 8.21 0.00
4. Baor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-B
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 7
5. Borrow Pit 4.00 180 0.72 0.76 0.00 1.50 600 0.90 0.95 0.38
6. Sanctuary 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 700 2.10 2.63 1.05
7. Beel stocking
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 1200 8.40 8.82 2.52
Total: B 317.5
0 33.83 42.15 0.00 80.00 18.57 21.36 3.95
Total: (A+B) 476.5
0 218.74 236.30 73.70 250.70 350.43 371.01 123.22
* Fish Tk.105.00/kg, Fingerling Tk.130 /kg and beel and sanctuary Tk.125/kg, as they contain shing, magur,koi etc.(at 2010 price) ** Only fish MT: Metric ton
Costs-Benefits: At a glance Table 4 provides information on costs to be incurred and the benefits to be gained from the fisheries activities in 2 implementing financial years. Fisheries activities are divided under two broad categories: CULTURE and CAPTURE. Cost estimates Table 5 provides all cost estimates of the sub-unit – 17-18 for the project period ( FY 2010-11 and 2012-13) Notes on these estimates:
Fisheries Production: Production costs are mentioned in Table 4. Detailed costs involved in unit productions are appended at the end of the report. Full production is expected from final year, i.e., July 2012 – June 2013 FYs.
Foundation Training: The most important and the biggest contribution of the project to increase fish production in a sustainable manner is training of the farmers and fishers. Production increase will result in two ways: firstly by horizontal means whereby new water areas are to be brought under different types of aquaculture requiring training for the new to-be farmers or entrants. Secondly, fish production increase is also possible by vertical means where the production rates of the used water bodies will increase. This will be achieved by providing training to the farmers in more effective and profitable technologies.
Besides farmers, fishermen and their family members will also be trained. Fishermen play an important role not only in harvesting but also in post harvest activities. Since they constitute a part of the ultra-poor people in the society, specially the ethnic ones, wherever available khas ponds/beel areas, borrow pits/sanctuaries, etc., will be used to accommodate them. They will receive training from the project to do all these and also to maintain them. Female family members will be trained in income generating activities including net making, fish processing and compost preparation.
A total of 166 farmers, fishers and others will be trained (Foundation training for 145 and Advanced training for 21). There are a good number of female pond owners who do not take active part in aquaculture as they are not trained. They are willing to take training and many of their family members are in favour of this move. Also there are scopes, other than aquaculture, where women can and should take part as those are very suitable for them considering their socio-economic situations. As many as 65 women (44% of the total foundation trainees) will take part in the overall training programme in different useful subjects.
There are some activities that will specifically suit the very poor people in providing them with special employment opportunities. To name a few are borrow pit aquaculture, compost preparation, fish processing, beel stocking, sanctuary, etc. These are going to add effective and sustainable dimension to the overall livelihoods aspect.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-B
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 8
Suitable training modules will be prepared as and where necessary for the purpose.
Table 4 : Productive Values, Productive Costs and Benefits of fisheries activities at a glance
Fisheries
Present year (July 2010-June ,2011) Final year (July 2012-June
2013) Incremental
Value Cost Benefits Value Cost Benefits Benefit/final
yr.
(Lac Tk.) (Lac Tk.) (Lac Tk.) (Lac Tk.) (Lac Tk.) (Lac Tk.) (Lac Tk.)
A. Culture
1. Pond 111.94 33.60
78.34 196.56 64.80 131.76 53.42
2. Nursery 0.00 0.00
0.00 6.19 1.63 4.56 4.56
3. Rice-Fish(gher) **
67.88 34.50
33.38 102.38 39.22 63.16 29.78
4. FP beel 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.35 3.10 4.25 4.25
5. Baor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6. Borrow pit 14.33 5.60 8.73 34.65 9.30 25.35 16.62
7. Canal 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.52 1.22 1.30 1.30
8. Pen 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
9. Cage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
10. Khas pond
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total: A 194.15 73.70
120.45 349.65 119.27 230.38 109.93
Table 4 Cont.: Production Values, Productive Costs and benefits of fisheries activities at a glance
Fisheries
Present year (July 2010-June ,11) Final year (July 2012-June 2013) Incremental
Value Cost Benefit
Value Cost Benefit Benefit/final
yr.
(Lac Tk.) (Lac Tk.)
(Lac Tk.) (Lac Tk.) (Lac Tk.) (Lac Tk.)
B.Capture
1. Khas low land 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2. Canal 0.98
0.00 0.98 0.75 0.00 0.75 (-)0.23
3. Floodplain/Beel 40.41 0.00 40.41 8.21 0.00 8.21 (-)32.20
4. Baor 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
5. Borrow Pit 0.76 0.00 0.76 0.95 0.38 0.57 (-)0.19
6. Sanctuary 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.63 1.05 1.58 1.58
7. Beel stocking 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.82 2.52 6.30 6.30
Total: B 42.15 0.00 42.15 21.36 3.95 17.41 (-) 24.74
Total: (A+B) 236.30 73.70 162.60 371.01 123.22 247.79 85.19
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-B
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 9
Table 5: Year Wise detailed Cost estimates for enhancement of production which will be supplied by the Project
Cost item FY July 10 - June 11 (lac)
FY July 11 - June 12(lac)
FY July 12- June 13(lac)
TOTAL(lac)
1. Trainings
1.1 Foundation training 1.30 1.10 2.40
1.2 Advanced training
0.80 0.80
1.3 Demonstration 1.90 1.10 3.00
1.4. Motivational tour 1.20 1.20
Sub-Total 1 3.20 3.00 1.20 7.40
2. Investment costs
2.1 Borrow pit development
1.40
1.40
2.2 Beel stocking 1.20 0.80 2.00
2.3 Sanctuary 0.60 0.30 0.90
2.4 Water test kit
Sub-Total 2 0.60 2.90 0.80 4.30
TOTAL (1+2) 3.80 5.90 2.00 11.70
Table 6: Foundation Training details
Trainee Topic Number Duration
A. Farmer Male Female Total
1. Fish Farmer Carp-Golda mixed culture 25 05 30 2 days
2. Fish Farmer Nursery operations 15 5 20 2 days
3. Fish farmer Mono-sex GIFT Tilapia culture
00 30 30 2 days
4. Fishers/ farmer Beel stocking 25 00 25 2 days
5.Fish Farmer Thai koi 00 25 25 2 days
6. Fishers/ farmer Sanctuary dev. 15 00 15 2 days
Total (6 topics)
80 65 145
Advanced training: This will form a strong part of exit strategy. Once the project duration comes to an end, fisheries activities are supposed to continue as useful economic activities. However, technology keeps on changing, new farmers come in, geo-physical conditions of the water bodies keep changing and nature of consumer demand varies. All these require even more effort to keep fisheries activities going on to meet the ever changing challenges. To meet the challenges one most important factor would be to develop enough of quality farmers who can also act as local extension agents for the local new and old farmers maintaining close liaison with the Upazila Fisheries Offices (DoF). With an aim to developing
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-B
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 10
such local supporting hands, the project is going to provide further training (advanced training) in some of the more useful subjects to the best farmers/fishers. It is expected that they will carry the advanced/up-to-date knowledge to the fellow farmers as well as apply to their own water bodies. This way, even after the completion of the project period, there will be some competent persons (18 nos.) to carry on the task of knowledge dissemination. Table 7 provides detailed information on this.
Table 7: Advanced training details
Trainee Topic Nos. Duration
1. Best performers Carp-Galda mixed culture 4 2 days
2. Best performers GIFT farming 5 2 days
3. Best performers Thai Koi farming 4 2 days
4. Best performers Nursery management farming 3 2 days 5. Best performers Beel stocking 3 2 days 6. Best performers Sanctuary 2 2 days TOTAL 21
Demonstration: As the motto goes ‘seeing is believing’, demonstration has always been regarded as one of the most effective tools in disseminating practical knowledge, especially the new ones. The fisheries programme, therefore, include some demonstrations of fisheries technologies with the expectation that the messages will reach not only to the direct project beneficiaries, but indirectly to many more. Following table (Table 8 below) provides a list of demonstrations. Project will bear all the inputs cost while the farmer will provide the suitable water body and do the field works.
Table 8: Details of technology demonstrations
Technology Units Farmer number Remarks
1. Major carp nursery 1 nos.
40 dcm each
1 M 0 F 1 Best in trainings and having suitable water bodies
2. Mono-sex GIFT Tilapia
5 nos.
25 dcm each
0 M 5 F 5 Best in trainings and having suitable water bodies
3. Thai koi culture 4 nos
20 dcm each
0 M 4 F 4 Best in trainings and having suitable water bodies
4. Beel stocking 2 nos 3 ha 5 M 0 F 2 Best in trainings and having suitable water bodies
5. Carp-polyculture 4nos 45 ha 3 M 0 F 4
Total: 16 demonstrations on 5 topics
Motivational tour: Sharing of experiences can be a good means of getting better ideas and confirming the used ones. Exchange visits by the best performers to other places can enrich and consolidate their knowledge base. It also works as good and positive incentive for the better and hard workers. Project has therefore included exchange visits in its programme in the final implementation year. Motivational tour will take place involving other sub-projects areas beyond the present sub-unit area. Not only the farmers and fishers but also the concerned officials will get the opportunity of such types of motivational tour. Programme is as follows (Table 9). Both males and females will participate in the visits :
Table 9: Details of motivational tour
Participants Number Places of visits
1. Carp-Galda farmers 2 best farmers TBC (to be confirmed)
2. Thai koi 3 best farmers TBC
3. Nursery operators - Carp 2 best operators TBC
4.GIFT 4 best operators TBC
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-B
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 11
5.Beel stocking/ sanctuary 5 best operators TBC Total 16 persons
Mode of implementation
Activities: In order to support increased fish production activities through environment-friendly and peoples’ participation, especially the poor fisherfolk of the locality, a number fisheries activities have been proposed and explained above. These are listed below for a quick look: 1. Fish production. It includes both culture and capture fisheries. There are traditional activities like
pond aquaculture and then there are new introductions like beel culture (community based fisheries management). These are meant to bring in more waters under aquaculture as well as to increase productivity. Targets are set by the project. However, under favourable conditions (local demand, profitability, no major natural disaster, etc.) motivated local people may go for higher targets, horizontally and vertically as well.
Pond aquaculture – In the final year productivity rate is expected to reach 2600kg/ha/yr from present production of 1523 kg/ha/yr .New species introduction will also be tried during this period. There are some Khas (govt. owned) ponds in the sub-unit area. Attempts will be made to recover this water area from the present occupiers, influential moneyed man, and give this to poor fishers.
Nursery – Efforts will be made to increase nursery area by 1.70 ha in 2011-12 FY . This is important to cope up with the increasing demand for quality seeds.
Rice-fish (Gher) aquaculture – A significant increase in area is to happen from present position. Present production rate is moderate with the scope of future production rate.
Borrow pit – It will be a big challenge to bring in local poor, disadvantaged women and /or fishers into the use of borrow pits as a means of aquaculture. Properly constituted WMGs have to play a big and strong role here. Culture practice will start from the next year. However, most important issue here is to get access to borrow pits presently under control of local influential persons.
Canal fishery – Actual rehabilitation/re-excavation works are expected to start in the next FY. Following the rehabilitation works the water is expected to support much more natural fish than before benefiting the local fishers. There is possibility that if canals are allowed for aquaculture the production within the canal will no doubt increase. More importantly, aquaculture is more prone to be captured by the local influential people. Better to leave it for natural production which will benefit not only the surrounding floodplains, especially during the flood season, also the poor fishers by ensuring their access to the natural water bodies. But some area may be arranged for genuine fisher and poor peoples of WMG members to sustain their livelihood.
{{
Beel stocking – Again local fishermen will be identified and organized into a team for the purpose. They will fence an area for about 7 days for the fingerlings to acclimatize with the local situations and to allow them to grow a little bigger to avoid immediate predation. Then the fence will be taken off and used elsewhere. Once they are dispersed in the adjacent waters, organized fisher group will monitor and have the right to fish according to their own management rules. The project proposed 8 ha to be stocked in the 3rd FY (2011-12) and additional 5 ha from 4th yr the fisher groups will take care of stocking and overall management.
2. Trainings
Foundation trainings will start immediately after the preparation of SIP report and it is planned to start in the year (January, 2011) FY of project implementation and will continue up to 2012-13 FY.
Advanced trainings, on the other hand, will be conducted in the concluding year or before the concluding year.
Demonstrations will be conducted, after the foundation trainings, mostly in this year.
Motivational tour will be conducted in the concluding year of the project implementation period.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-B
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 12
3. Investment activities. These will follow the time of use of particular water body. These are all one time support to develop the bases so that the poor fishers and women can carry on from there. An Endowment Fund/Revolving Fund for Tk. 4.30 lac (except water test kit) may be created for the purpose. WMO has to play an important role in administering the fund to ensure efficient use and transparency of the fund management.
Floodplain beel stocking (CBFM) in 2011-12 FY 5 ha and 2012-13 FY another 2 ha. The investment worth is Tk. 15,000 per ha, on an average, and will be used for the required earth works and fry purchasing only.
Borrow pit development. Average per hectare earth work support is Tk 15,000 and the works will start from 2011-12 FY ending in 2012-13 FY.
4. Monitoring and Evaluation, and Reporting of fisheries activities. As expected, this activity will stretch over the entire implementation period. To make it a participatory a well as more effective concerned officials will be trained on how to involve the farmers/fishers in the process. Table -10 below summarizes the incremental production, implementation period, responsible personnel
and trainings. Culture fisheries will contribute the lion share of increasing fish production (146.95 MT) in
the concluding year of the project completion. With an aim to developing such local supporting hands, the
project is going to provide further training (advance training) in some of the more useful subjects to the
best farmers/ fishers. Training will be provided through the DoF staff and specialists from their research
institutes, but may also be provided by the local private experts and NGO staff to the extent that existing
public institution staff resources are insufficient.
Table 10: The mode of implementation of fisheries related major activities
Activity Expected output Responsibility Timing
1. Fisheries programme
1.1 CULTURE Incremental production total: 146.95 MT
Beneficiaries and project fisheries personnel
Final Year of the project
1.2. CAPTURE Incremental production total: ( -) 15.26
Beneficiaries and project fisheries personnel
Final Year of the project
Total Incremental production total: 131.69 MT
Beneficiaries and project fisheries personnel
Final Year of the project
2. Trainings
2.1 Foundation training 145 (M 80and F 65) project beneficiaries capable of practicing modern fisheries technologies
Project fisheries personnel
In 2010-11 and 2011-12 FY
2.2 Advanced training 21selected (best performers) farmers/fishers and others capable of carrying out task of technology dissemination beyond project period
Project fisheries personnel
Concluding year
2.3 Demonstrations
16 demonstrations on new and improved technologies making fellow farmers, other than the direct project beneficiaries), capable of handling new technologies
Project fisheries personnel
In 2010-11 and 2011-12 FY
2.4 Motivational tour 16 best performers capable of sharing experiences with their counterparts within and without the project area
Project fisheries personnel
Concluding year
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-B
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 13
Activity Expected output Responsibility Timing
facilitating exchange of ideas for even better results
3. Investment supports
3.1 Floodplain beel 7 ha floodplain beel area developed for aquaculture
Concerned beneficiaries and the project fisheries personnel
In 1st half of 2011-12 & 1st half of 2012-13 FYs.
3.2 Borrow pits 3.00 ha of borrow pit developed for aquaculture
Concerned beneficiaries and the project fisheries personnel
In 1st half of 2011- 12 FY .
4. M&E and Reporting Project implementation activities monitored, evaluated and reports prepared as when necessary
Project fisheries personnel
The whole implementation period
Following the MOU signed between the BWDB and the Department of Fisheries, a meaningful cooperation between these two organizations, especially in providing technological support to the project fisheries personnel as well as to the beneficiaries, is expected. Project NGOs as well as other NGOs operating in the region can provide useful suggestions and guidance in the way of consultation meetings with the project personnel regarding mainly the social aspects of the project objectives. Properly developed WMO will always be the key body for the effective and transparent implementation of the activities. Fishing Community / Dependable Community in SIP area
There are three types of fishermen like-full time fishers (professional fisher), part-time fishers and subsistence fishers. The professional fisher of the project area is mostly poor and deprived community. They are generally landless and have no alternative income source. There is less practice of family planning and sanitation system due to lack of awareness, financial capability that are very common for other poor peoples. The full time fishers catch fish for their livelihood round the year in surrounding rivers, khals and beels. A total of 90 numbers of professional fishermen which are fully depend on fishing but from recent few years they catch fish from khal and beels only from July to mid January, when water is available in these areas, rest of the time they harvest fish from pond as a daily labour (tk.165-190 per day) or harvesting fish by share basis. But they are harvesting the fish from river round the year. Part time fisher catch the fish to maintain their family only September to December each year when fish are available in beels and floodplain and no work in their surrounding areas. A total of 111 numbers of part time fishermen are found during the FGD program and their present average income per year tk. 22,000.00- 27,000.00 from fisheries. During FGD program, an opinion was passed from local peoples for professional fishermen to ensure their involvement in fishery enhancement program like sanctuary fishing, fry stocking in beel, leased out public low land water bodies to fisher. Also give them the top priority in alternative livelihood program and trainings to earn more money and employment opportunity. Mitigation measures for Professional fishermen:
Capture fisheries is declining due to decreasing water areas, destroying of the mother stock because of dewatering of the whole low land water bodies, obstacle of migration route, destruction of breeding and feeding grounds and over fishing etc. Professional fishermen will be affected no doubt, does not mean that all fishermen will be vulnerable, because river fishery is always open to all for fishing. But culture fisheries is increasing from last decades. Fishermen have also started changing their life pattern gradually for their necessities and survivability. The following measures should be taken for their survival under enhancement of project activities.
By Khas water bodies : The fishermen can excess easily into Khas water bodies ( low land area). This land will be leased out for fishermen/ landless peoples under Fishery Sub Committee for a long term basis for fish culture. But only few water bodies are found during survey.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-B
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 14
By fry rearing : Under Fishery Sub Committee, fishermen will take the private small water bodies for rearing fry. It is very profitable business and earn more money within 3-5 months. Because project will provide nursery management training for fry rearing to WMG members.
By beel stocking : Under the enhance plan, some low land area will be transferred into deep area to save mother fish as a mother stock to breed more fish and save the local variety of fishes. Some condition to be applied for land owners, such as, at least 10 years of those deep part and surrounding low land area must be under Fishery Sub Committee with involvement of fishermen. And land owners will take share or lease money per year of their lands for leasing out their land.
By Marketing Channel : Marketing is more profitable business than other work either in Fisheries or Agriculture products and others. A marketing channel will be developed especially for fishermen under fishery section or IGAs to create employment opportunity and earning more money.
By demonstration pond : Under enhancement program, a lot of demonstration pond will be implemented to increase fish production through group wise approach and benefit will be shared among group members. Fishermen should take initiatives under this program.
By IGAs program: Through IGAs , fishermen will take initiative to create employment opportunity like net making and other related activities for their livelihood.
Wet - Land Management : Wet land conservation is very important for aquatic flora and fauna, and to enrich the bio-diversity. It is also important to landless and genuine fishermen for their livelihood and animal protein supply. During FGD program a discussions was made about the importance of Wet Land Conservation. All members realized it but most of the members prefer the crop production than bio-diversity and fish production. They also pass their opinion which is only possible in govt. khas land but only 0.95 ha khas low land is occurred in SIP. Before making a final decision especially for private wet land management, a detailed discussions will be needed with WMG members and local peoples (high/ medium /low land owners) to clear and concrete decision about inundation areas. A demarcation should be established in all low land areas, when, where and how much areas will be inundated or not. WMG members and local people will take proper concrete decision about wet land management.
Value addition The per capita consumption rate has shown in declining trend in recent years due to high population growth which is faster than the growth rate of fish production. It is becoming increasingly impossible to maintain the stable of foods, especially the animal protein. The prospects of adding value to by catch largely depend on the demand. Good quality raw material supplies are an essential pre requisite for any value added processing activity. Once the quality of raw materials get deterioration, there is no way to improve it by any means of preservation and processing. Improvement of handling of by catch can be done by sorting, de-heading and gutting during the catching. Although storage life inside ice, varies from species to species. Iced fish was found fairly good for 8-10 days. All the species are not equally suitable for processing of various value added products. Difference flesh characteristics in a product may influence the quality and make the product unattractive to the consumers, in terms of appearance, flavor and odour. Training will be provided to WMG members through the DoF staff and specialists from Research Institutes. Marketing Much of the catch, particularly from fresh water both from culture and capture, is consumed locally by the local peoples or with in same thana or district. However there are areas which consume less than they produce and therefore have a surplus which can be exported to other areas of the country. Almost all fish traded internally passes through private channels. The market structure varies from area to area. Marketing Channels divides into four stages; primary market, secondary market, higher secondary market and final consuming market. The primary market: Here the fisherman sells to a mobile assembler, who may be known as a mahajan, a jogandar or a faria The Secondary Market:
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-B
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 15
The assembler sells the fish in a wholesale market to local retailers {nickaries}. Local wholesale {Paikers}, or distributors who transport the fish to other districts {beparis or chalans}. The sale is normally carried out through the medium of a commission agent {arotdar} who conducts public auctions The higher secondary market: Fish consumed at a distance from the secondary market is transported by distributors {bepari or chalan} to other distribution markets, usually whole sale markets in districts towns. Here they sell to local retailers {nickaries} and whole sellers {paikers} through local aratdars. Training and extension program will be organized for WMG members to develop the marketing channel to get more price from their own products and to create employment opportunity. Summarized activities on strength and weakness of Directorate of Fisheries (DoF)
Sl.
No.
Issues Activities of DoF Activities of SW project
with line agencies
Remarks
01. Soil test of
pond
DoF generally do not go for
soil testing for fish culture in
pond, only they do the
some special cases.
WMG members will take
initiatives for soil testing for
increased production &
prevention of fish diseases
in ponds.
Mainly for intensive
fish culture and
prevention of
diseases.
02. Water quality
test of pond
DoF do water quality test in
problematic ponds (fish
diseases affected pond)
WMG members will take
initiatives for water testing
for applying the lime,
organic and inorganic
fertilizer, and prevention of
diseases
Kit box of water
quality test need to
be provided to each
WMA level from
project
03. Quality fry /
fingerlings
Procurement
Farmers purchase
fry/fingerlings individually
from open market without
maintaining quality. DoF do
not involve in such type of
activities
WMG members will procure
quality fry / fingerlings from
the reputed hatchery / firm
by taking advice from
fisheries specialists (
project or DoF) collectively.
WMG members
collectively will
procure quality fry /
fingerlings with
cheap rate.
04. Establish
demonstration
ponds
Learning by doing is more
effective-which is not
always practiced in DoF.
During 4th fisheries project
some demonstration ponds
were established in Narail
areas but within SIP area.
Some demonstration ponds
will be established on
different aspects under the
project among from WMG
members pond.
Dissemination of
technology in the
project area for
increasing fish
production.
05. Shortage of
organic
fertilizer in
pond for
DoF do not take initiative
for such type of activities.
Project will introduce
adequate amount of
compost preparation to be
provided to fish pond for
To apply organic
fertilizer in pond for
increasing
productivity.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-B
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 16
increasing
productivity.
increased fish production
06. Massive use
of pesticides
in rice cum
fish culture/
surrounding
beels saving
the HYV rice
crop.
Farmers normally use
pesticides during pest
attacks without caring of
doses and quantity. DoF is
not involve in such types of
activities.
Use of high doses of
pesticides need to be
discouraged through
practicing IPM/ICM.
07. Training
No training is going on at
present on modern
methods of fish culture .
Rigorous training will be
provided to WMG members
on different aspects of
fisheries production by the
project with the help of line
agencies.
WMG members
will be skilled up
about modern fish
culture.
08. Cultivation of
High Value
fish like Sing,
Koi , Magur,
Pabda etc
Farmers have shallow
knowledge of valued fish.
DoF do not take initiative
about high value fish
culture in this area.
Project will take initiative
with help of DoF & BFRI to
introduce high value fish
culture in this area through
WMG members for
increased production and
benefit.
WMG members
will know about
high value fish and
its culture
technique.
09. Fish
production
Present fish production of
pond is an average of 1235
kg/ha/yr
Production will be
increased up to 2500
kg/ha/yr through
enhancement program
under the project.
Fish production will
be increased due to
enhancement
program.
10. Marketing
facilities
Farmers sell their fish at
nearby markets individually.
No initiative is taken by
DoF about the
development of marketing
system.
WMG members will take
initiatives with the help of
project to sell their fish
collectively to big business
centres to get more
benefit.
Marketing system
will be established
through WMG
members
collectively.
11. Fry stocking
in beel
No such types of activities
are being taken up by DOF
Project will take initiative for
stocking through WMG
members to increase
production and more
To create a
employment
opportunity and
income generating
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-B
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 17
income. activities.
12. Sanctuary
development
Few fish sanctuaries were
established in Narai district
during 4th Fisheries Project
but not in this SIP area. At
present no such types of
activities are found.
Project will established fish
sanctuary to conserve
threatened fish and to
increase production
through WMG members
activities.
To enrich the
biodiversity
13. Manpower No sufficient manpower to
conduct extension program
and other fisheries related
activities.
Project will supply the
sufficient manpower to
conduct extension and
fisheries related activities of
WMG/ WMA members.
14.
Monitoring &
Evaluation
At present there is no
monitoring system of DoF
on their fisheries activities
SW project will establish
monitoring system with
MIS data base to know the
project achievement .
WMG
members/Local
people / authority of
the project will
know the
achievement of the
objectives.
Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring tools:
1. Farmer and Fisher Record Books. These would constitute the major backbone of the M&E drive. These will not only help the beneficiaries in assessing their achievements but also to improve next year activity plan. Not all but representative samples of these books would also help the project management including WMO to evaluate performance. It is difficult but not impossible to put a significant number of the beneficiaries, if not all, into the habit of keeping records regularly. Making them adequately aware of the immediate as well far reaching benefits is the key.
2. Project Record Books and Report Cards. Project will also maintain quarterly implementation records adequately reporting the progress made, qualitative as well quantitative, and identifying issues that needs to be resolved for better performance in the next quarter. Project personnel, especially the Senior Fisheries Facilitators, will be the responsible persons.
3. MIS-based monitoring. Project management in their MIS-based overall M&E system will include fisheries activities as an important and indispensable component. Fisheries personnel will assist in developing this system so that an effective mechanism is developed with which quality of implementation and progress made can be properly assessed and the project impact can also be assessed some times after the end of the project period. Among others, special attention should be made to include issues like women participation and empowerment, inclusion of poor fisher folk and their family members into the mainstream of fisheries activities, and the salinity issue to guard against Bagda shrimp culture, etc., in the MIS format.
Performance indicators:
Area increase and utilization under different culture and capture systems as outlined in this sub-unit implementation plan above.
Production increase, where applicable, as outlined in this sub-unit implementation plan above.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-B
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 18
Beneficiary count: trainee and participants in the various activities considering the gender and livelihoods aspects.
Effective check of saline water intrusion: proper handling of water regulators/structures.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-B
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 19
Activities at a glance, SWC – 17&18
SL.No
Activities 2010-2011
2011-2012 2012-2013
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
1 Fish production
1.1 Pond aquaculture (extension)
1.2 Nursery
1.3 Demonstration pond
1.4 Rice-fish
1.5 Floodplain beel
1.6 Borrow pit
1.7 Canal
1.8 Beel stocking
2 Training
2.1 Foundation training
2.2 Advance training
2.3 Motivational tour
3
Development of Marketing Facilities
4 Investment activities
4.1 Floodplain fish culture
4.2 Borrow pit repair
5 Monitoring & evaluation
5.1 Data collection
5.2 Data analysis
6 Reporting
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 20
Collective Action Activities (CAP) Fisheries Section, SWC-17&18 During FGD, the following initiatives are recorded from the WMG members who expressed to work collectively. The list of planned initiatives and training required opted by the WMG / Members are listed below.
Name of WMG/
no./village
List of planned initiatives by groups
Training topics Remarks
Chemieli S-18/1
Dariagata
1. Demonstration ponds (1no.) 2. Pond (extension) (4 no.) 3. Rice –fish (1 no.) 4. Gher extension (6 no.) 5. Fry procurement ( by 1group.) 6 .Marketing activities( by 1group.)
1.Carp-polyculture 2.GIFT culture in small size pond 3. Marketing 4. Valued fish culture in pond (Thai koi, Sing, Magur & Pabda
They are interest in training and demos activities
Beli S- 18/ 2 Amtola
1. Demonstration ponds (1no.) 2. Pond (extension) (4 no.) 3. Nursery (1 no) 4. Rice –fish (2 no.) 5. Gher extension (4 no.) 6. Fish culture in borrow pit (1place by 1group.).
1. Marketing chain 2. Valued fish culture in pond (Thai koi, Sing, Magur &
Pabda 3. Poly culture
Keya S-18/3 Bajebabra
1.Demonstration ponds (1no.) 2.Pond (extension) (4 no.) 3. Sanctuary (1place by 1group.) 4.Fry procurement (1group.) 5.Marketing activities(1group.)
1.Carp-Golda mix culture 2.GIFT culture in small size pond 3. Sanctuary development 4. Valued fish culture in pond (Thai koi, Sing, Magur & Pabda
Most of the WMG members are interested in training especially in carp-golda culture.
Nabagonga S-17&18/4 Noagram
1. Demonstration ponds (1no.) 2. Pond (extension) (4 no.) 3. Rice –fish (1 no.) 4. Gher extension (5 no.) 5. Fry procurement ( by 1group.) 6 .Marketing activities( by 1group.)
1.Fish culture in rice fish 2.GIFT culture in small size pond 3. Fry management 4. Valued fish culture in pond (Thai koi, Sing, Magur & Pabda
They are interest in training and demos activities
Ekota S-17&18/5 Diadanga
1..Demonstration ponds (1no.) 2. Pond (extension) (5 no.) 3. Rice –fish (2 no.) 4. Gher extension (6 no.) 5. Sanctuary (1place by 1group.) 6. Fry procurement ( by 1 group.) 7. Water and soil quality test: 8. Fry procurement ( by 1group.)
1.Carp-polyculture 2.GIFT culture in small size pond
3. Sanctuary development 4. Sanctuary development 5. Value chain
Suruvi S-18/5A Parbisnopur
1. Demonstration ponds (1 no.) 2. Pond (extension) (4 no.) 3.Nursery (1 no) 4. Beel stocking (1place by 1group) 5. Marketing activities( by 1group)
1. GIFT culture in small size pond 2. Nursery management 3.Valued fish culture in pond (Thai koi, Sing, Magur) 4. Marketing activities
A few members interest in nursery management
Hasnehena S-18/6
1.Demonstration ponds (2 no.) 2.Pond (extension) (5 no.) 3.Rice –fish (2 no.)
1.Carp-polyculture 2.GIFT culture in small size pond
They are interest in training and demos activities
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 21
Burikhali 4. Gher extension (6 no.) 5. Sanctuary (1place by 1group.) 6. Fry procurement (1group.) 7.Marketing activities(1group.) 8.Water and soil quality test
3.Valued fish culture in pond (Thai koi, Sing, Magur
Rajanigandha S-18/6A Pervumbag
1. Demonstration ponds (1 no.) 2. Pond (extension) (4 no.) 3.Nursery (1 no) 4. Beel stocking (1place by 1group) 5. Marketing activities( by 1group)
1. GIFT culture in small size pond 2. Nursery management 3.Valued fish culture in pond (Thai koi, Sing, Magur) 4. Marketing activities
A few members interest in nursery management
Konokchapa S-18/7 Perulistan
1.Demonstration ponds(1 no.) 2.Pond (extension) (3 no.) 3.Nursery (1 no) 4.Rice –fish (1 no.) 5. Gher extension (5 no.) 6. Fish culture in canal (1place by 1group.) 7. Water and soil quality test: 8. Fry procurement ( by 1group.) 9. Marketing activities ( by 1group.)
1.GIFT culture in small size pond 2. Nursery management 3.Valued fish culture in pond (Thai koi, Sing, Magur & Pabda 4. Marketing activities
Some member interested in marketing activities.
Gondaraj S-18/8 Pateshori
1. Demonstration ponds (1no.) 2.Pond (extension) (3 no.) 3.Nursery (1 no) 4.Rice –fish (2 no.) 5. Gher extension (4 no.) 6. Fish culture in borrow pit (1place by 1group.). 7.Sanctuary (1place by 1group.) 8.Fish culture in beel (1place by 1group.) 9. Fry procurement ( by 1 group.)
1.Carp-polyculture 2.GIFT culture in small size pond
3. Sanctuary development 4.Fish culture beel through Community Based Management. 5. Value chain
All members are interested in demos activities
Notes
Demonstration ponds: Some demos will be conducted through WMG members collectively to introduce new technology on carp – polyculture, carp-golda mix culture, GIFT and valued fish like Thai koi and Sing fish. Learning by Doing process will be adopted and at the last harvesting day, a field day will be arranged for all WMG members and surrounding pond owners to observed the fish directly and hearing culture technology from pond operator directly. Such type of program will create a awareness and confidence among pond owners.
Nursery pond: A few water area will be arranged for nursery management. Most of the members do not know how to rearing / culture fish fry. But huge demand the quality of fingerling in this area for fish culture in their ponds. After receiving the training on nursery management from the project, WMG members will start fry culture through “Learning by Doing” having facilitation from SF/ ISPMC Fishery consultant . These activities will be able to meet shortage of quality fry/ finger ling and ultimately will enhance the production of fish.
Extension Pond: Most of the WMG members culture their ponds without proper technical knowledge, only they release fry without maintaining numbers and ratio and culture fish with out proper management. So production rate is very low. But after receiving training from project, members of WMG will be skilled on fish culture and production would be increased ultimately.
Fry procurement : Sub committee members of WMG are agreed to procure the fry/ fingerlings collectively to safe time and money. They will supply fry/fingerlings with in WMG members and surrounding pond owners. They will do the work with the help of concern SF and CF through guidance of ISPMC.
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 22
Fish culture in Canal: Sub committee of WMG members are agreed to fish culture in canal through group based to boost up production and create an employment opportunity with the direct involvement of dependable community. The concern SF and CF will facilitata the committee to perform their activities.
Fish culture in Rice field: Surrounding members of beel are agreed to fish culture in monsoon period through community based management including dependable community to increase fish production in beel areas and create employment opportunity with facilitation from ISPMC/SF/ PMO.
.Beel stocking: Some WMG members are agreed to stock the fingerlings in the beel through community management to increase fish production and employment opportunity. At some part of Bangladesh, community based management fingerling stocking in beel has been successful in increasing (from 500 kg to 1200 to1800 kg/ha) fish production and employment opportunities. Water and soil quality test: Members of sub committee of WMG are interested to test water quality test of their ponds to increase production up to optimum level and minimize the production cost and prevent fish diseases. SF will facilitate concern WMG members to test their soil and water quality from BFRI or DOF. Or each WMA level will be provided a test kit by which each members will be able to know their test report with the help of SF/Consultant, After getting results which will be discussed among the members and advised them what to do. Thus by this collective initiatives, farmer will be benefited.
Marketing activities: Under this SIP some WMG members are interested to develop the marketing channel to get an appropriate price from their commodities with the help of technical support of the project. Normally sale the fish in pond side or the nearest market where they get the low prices. But if WMG members and keep the harvested fish in store under own custody of marketing committee of WMG and communicate with whole sellers (Narail / Khulna or even Dhaka) and will be able to bargain with them for appropriate prices and marketing channel will be created.
Trainings The above training topics were selected by WMG members through which they can equipped with knowledge and techniques for more fish production.
ANNEX – C
ENVIRONMENTAL
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-C
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 1
Monitoring Report-1: Environmental Impact and Safeguard Monitoring
For SIP- 17-18 (SWC): Baseline
Environment
FCD projects are implemented with the objectives of controlling flood and improving drainage of an
area, which bring some changes in water related ecology in the area mainly. Moreover, many efforts
have been planned to fulfill the project goal, some of which may also affect the environmental quality
of the area.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management project SAIRPMP) presently
composed of rehabilitation of 2 FCD sub-projects (with minor support to surface irrigation) namely
Narail sub-project NSP) and Chenchuri sub-project (CSP), which have been subjected to further
segmentation into sub unit implementation planning (SIP) areas, based on hydrological unit mainly.
Presently a report on the environmental situation of SIP- 17-18 of SWC areas is under considerations
(Map enclosed).
A survey on the present environmental conditions of the SIP area has been undertaken that will be
used as base data, and the required measures have to be undertaken to safeguard the environmental
standards throughout project life and beyond.
The present data collection and monitoring plan is based on environmental issues that are found
during the preparation of EIA. Main Environmental Impacts include
Possible increase in agricultural pollution of soil/waste due to increased agriculture.
Reduce the natural grazing areas, likely to contribute to reduction of number of bovines.
Increase dependence on fuel wood (rather than cow-dung) for cooking.
Reduce the jungle area contributing to reduction of terrestrial biodiversity
Lowering the ground water table by increased use of tube well water for irrigation and
reduced recharge potentiality.
Reduce the number and size of perennial and seasonal wetland areas affecting livelihood of
fisher folks, protein intake of poor people, aquatic flora and fauna, ground water recharge etc.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-C
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 2
Figure: Map of the SWC 17-18
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-C
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 3
1. Drinking Water
It is found that test of arsenic contamination of HTWs of all the sampled villages of SIP-17 and 18 has
been carried out by DPHE between 2004 and 2008; total number of HTWs is being about 550, there
is report of arsenic-contamination of about 80 HTW in the area.
An NGO, namely Ulashi Sreejoni Songha , imparted awareness training on adverse affects of
drinking arsenic contaminated drinking water during 2007, in addition to DPHE’s routine activities
since 2004. The sampled three villages namely Satbaria, Kalamonkhali and Perbishnopur that
SAIWRPMP carried out the study. The local people of that villages commented HTWs water are
arsenic free and no iron content but little amount of saline content.
Table-1: Status of Arsenic-content of HTW Water in SIP 17-18
No of Tubewells Arsenic contaminated % of Arsenic contaminated
550 80 14.54
Source: Field Survey
2. Sanitation Facility
There exists different types of latrines in the total areas of two sampled area; their extents are given
in the following table (Table-9):
Table- 2: Types of latrines in use in the area
Types of latrines Nos. Per cent
Pucca 87 5.02
Ring slab 1150 66.32
Open/kutcha 395 22.78
Wild 102 5.88
Total 1,734 100.00
Source: Field data of survey villages
It is found that the NGO Ulashi Sreejoni Songho started some motivational training of the local people from 2007 on general health issues, which is still continued.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-C
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 4
It is found that wild defecation practice still exists among the male, especially when they go outside for field work, although their number has reduced due to training and motivational activities of DPHE and NGOs. It needs further motivation through training.
Most of the HHs (91%) has hygienic sanitation facility in three sampled villages, overwhelmed by ring
slab latrines. But all ring slab latrines may not qualify for hygienic one.
Table 3: Situation of Sanitation Facility
Village No of HHs No. of sanitation facility Comments
Satbaria 20 18(90%) Sanitation facilities include ring slab latrines* mainly, with about 20% pucca latrines. The remaining unhygienic latrines are composed of open latrines.
Kalamonkhali 14 13 (93%)
Perbishnupur 19 17 (89%)
Total 53 48 (91%)
Source: Field Survey; *All the ring slab latrines are not hygienic, as many of them have their goose-
neck broken, due to lack of awareness.
3. Water Quality
Laboratory analyses of surface water (ponds and khals) have been carried out recently based on
requirements of fishery production and the results are furnished below:
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-C
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 5
Table 4: Results of laboratory analyses of water samples
Sample
no.
Date of
collection Location
Dissolved
Oxygen
(DO)
Biochemical
Oxygen
Demand
(BOD)
Chemical
Oxygen
Demand
(COD)
pH
Electrical
Conductivity
(EC)
Turbidity Sulphate TDS
mg/l mg/l mg/l µs/m JTU ppm mg/l
1. 06.5.09 Pond in village Purulia,
U/C- Purulia, Upazila - Kalia
1.3 14.0 23.0 7.73 470 7.78 004 288
2. 06.5.09 Pond in village Dariaghata,
U/C- Purulia, Upazila - Kalia
1.2 16.0 28.0 7.06 520 3.28 055 218
3. 06.5.09 Liner khal in village -Chandpur,
U/C- Purulia, Upazila - Kalia
2.4 13.2 22.0 7.03 9600 8.33 264 3720
4. 06.5.09 Pond in village Raghunathpur
U/C- Peruli, Upazila- Kalia
2.2 13.4 20.3 7.13 462 5.53 044 397
5. 07.5.09 Matiary khal in village -Jadavpur,
U/C- Purulia, Upazila - Kalia
2.8 12.0 18.3 7.27 10,400 7.59 135 4670
6. 07.5.09 Pond in the beel centre, village -
Jadavpur,
U/C- Purulia, Upazila - Kalia
2.3 14.0 16.2 7.33 10,800 6.50 223 5020
7. 07.5.09 Pond in village Jadavpur
U/C- Peruli, Upazila- Kalia
2.6 13.4 17.3 7.38 80015 16.22 192 2310
8. 07.5.09 Jadavpur khal in village Jadavpur,
U/C- Purulia, Upazila - Kalia
1.5 15.1 18.0 7.11 13504 36.91 206 4990
9. 07.5.09 Pond (gher) in village Jadavpur
U/C- Peruli, Upazila- Kalia
2.7 12.3 16.3 7.09 3000 032 1640
10. 07.5.09 River Chitra, village Mohishkhola
U/C- Peruli, Upazila- Kalia
3.7 12.6 16.4 7.49 12800 16.73 285 5920
11. 07.5.09 Pateshwari khal (country side) in village
Mohishkhola, U/C- Peruli, Upazila -
Kalia
3.5 13.2 15.0 7.58 9805 42.03 212 5400
12. 07.5.09 Pond in village Pateshwari
U/C- Peruli, Upazila- Kalia
3.4 13.4 13.3 7.50 1500 7.44 225 1110
13 07.5.09 Pond in village Noagram,
U/C- Purulia,, Upazila- Kalia
1.4 17.1 16.2 7.45 522 106.0 006 394
14 07.5.09 River Nabaganga village Noagram
U/C- Purulia, Upazila- Kalia
2.0 16.2 16.2 7.51 13750 10.06 235 4520
15 07.5.09 Pond in village Amtola
U/C- Purulia , Upazila- Kalia
1.6 17.0 20.00 7.42 800 70.0 25 397
Permissible limit >5 For fish- <6.0
and
for irrigation
<10
6.5-8.5 Up to 10 upto 400
ppm
Source: Water samples were analyzed at site and in the laboratory of Department of Soil, Water and
Environment, Dhaka University.
It is observed that Dissolved Oxygen (DO) of all the water samples are below the permissible limit
requiring some measures and water turbidity in samples 1 &2 is high probably due to washing of soil
particles by erosion or due to excessive human uses.
4. Use of Chemical Fertilizers
It is observed that most of the farmers apply different doses of chemical fertilizers mainly on their
experience (some farmers learn from surrounding farmers) and crop responses, although a few of
them receive some training from DAE. In doing so, farmers fail to maintain balance of fertilizers in
most occasions. According to field survey various chemical fertilizers used for different crops mainly
grown in the area are given in the following table:
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-C
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 6
Table-4: Average Use of Chemical Fertilizers (kg/ha)
Crops Fertilizers (kg/hectare)
Urea TSP MP Zinc Sulphate Gypsum
B. Aus - - - -
T.Aus 80 44 12 - -
B. Aman 55 30 - - -
Lt Aman 75 32 - - -
HYV T. Aman 200 75 42 10 5
Boro(HYV/Hybrid) 280 120 75 45 8
Jute 90 70 25
Wheat 120 80 30
Onion 80 40
Sesame 40 40 16
Source: Field survey
5. Use of Pesticides/Insecticides
It is found that farmers usually use pesticides/ insecticides for Boro crops mainly. Main types and
quantity used are given below (based on field data):
Table-5: Average use of pesticides/insecticides
Village Crops Type of pesticide/insecticide
Average Quantity(kg) /ha
Remarks
Satbaria Boro (HYV/Hybrid)
Furadan/Basudin 10 Some farmers use sunfuran, Brifer and Kartap for Boro crops in addition to Thiovit/Dimecron. The farmers use no kind of insecticides/ pesticides for other crops.
Kalamonkhali Boro (HYV/Hybrid)
Furadan/Basudin 7.5
Boro (HYV) Thiovit/Kurater 10
Perbishnopur Boro (HYV/Hybrid)
Thiovit/Sumithion/ Dimecron
3.5
Vegetable Thiovit/Sumithion 3.0
Source: Field Survey
Application of insecticides/pesticides is carried out by DAE-trained local people on payment. The total
quantities applied by the people will be collected on use per hectare in various crops.
6. Wetlands/Beels
There is no perennial wetland/beel in the SIP area. The existing beels remain inundated for 6-7
months from June to December. Data/ information on the beels are furnished in the following table:
Table-6: Beel situation
Village Beel name Depth of beel during monsoon
No. of HHs of affected livelihood
No. of HHs of partly affected livelihood
Remarks
Satbaria Takimara beel (60.73 ha)
1.2-2.0m but dries out seasonally
5 13 All the beels are seasonally inundated.
Kalamonkhali Pateshwar beel 6 10
Perbishnupur Pateshwar beel 4 11
Source: Field survey
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-C
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 7
The potentially affected HHs have, who are mainly fishermen, to be provided with alternative suitable
means of livelihood.
7. Irrigation Facility
Ground water is the major source of irrigation water, as shown in the following table:
Table-7: Status of Irrigation Water
Village Per cent irrigated by
surface water
Per cent irrigated by
Ground water
Problems of irrigation
Satbaria 10 90 Lowering of GWT creates problem in lifting of irrigation water;
Salinity of river water;
Siltation and early drying of khal;
Non-functional regulator (gates broken).
Kalamonkhali 5 95
Perbishnupur 8 92
Total 7.66% 92.34%
Source: Field Survey
8. Bovine animals and cow dung
Data on number of bovine animals and different uses of cow dung of the sampled villages of SIP
areas are given in the following table:
Table-8: No. of Bovine animals and cow-dung
Village Total nos.
Total cow-dung (kg/day)
Quantity (in kg/day) of cow-dung for different uses
Remarks
For fuel For manure Others
Satbaria 62 (20*)
459 395 44 20 Other uses of cow-dung include smearing of court yard and earthen house floor mainly.
Kalamonkhali 35 (11*)
200 145 40 15
Perbishnupur 35 (13*)
190 140 37 13
Total 132 (44*)
849 680 (80.10%)
121 (14.25%)
48 (5.65%)
Source: Field Survey; * Figures in the parenthesis indicate number of HHs.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-C
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 8
Currently most HHs is using cow-dung as the main source of fuel (approx. 80.10%). Potential
increase in agricultural crop lands following improvements to flooding a changed situation is expected.
This may reduce the grazing land and livestock population that will reduce the amount of cow dung
available for energy needs. This may lead to increase demand of fuel wood.
9. Fuel wood situation
Fuel wood is available round the year in the area, although its price goes up during monsoon, when
dry fuel wood is scarce. Information on fuel wood has been furnished given in the following table:
Table-9: Availability and use of fuel wood
Village Availability Average consumption/HH
(kg/day)
Remarks
Satbaria Available round the year 6 The availability of fuel wood becomes difficult during the rainy season (during mid-June to mid- October).
Kalamonkhali 7
Perbishnupur 9
Total 7.3 kg
Source: Field Survey
10. Renewable Energy
Cow dung, crop residues, leaves and twigs and fuel wood are main energy sources used for cooking
(major) and crop processing in the area. The extent of different sources is shown as follows:
Table-8: Extent of use of bio-mass sources
Bio-mass sources Extent of uses (per cent)
Cow dung 42.20
Leaves and twigs 18.75
Crop residues 25.50
Fuel wood 13.55
Total 100.00
Source: Data on field survey
Availability of bio-mass sources is not satisfactory to the people of the sample villages for the
following reason.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-C
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 9
Shortage of livestock (production of reduced cowdung)
Shortage of crop residues (for crop damage)
Reduced availability of fuel wood.
The potential solution of fuel shortage can be solved as opined by the respondents are as follows, as
opined by the respondents:
Checking crop damage and production of better crops will ensure more crop by-products
More livestock animals should be reared
Jute cultivation should be increased
Increase of plantation activities.
Consumption of renewable energy is mostly utilized for cooking purposes ( 74.50 per cent) whereas
crop processing consume a small extent (25.50 per cent) in SIP-17 and 18 areas.
11. Grazing/Fodder Situation
The study area SWC-17-18 no significant grazing area is present. The situation is worsening day by
day. That’s why number of bovines is decreasing in the area, which ultimately enhanced use of power
tiller for cultivation. Due to lack of fodder the bovine animals’ production capacity is also hampered.
Moreover, reduction of grazing areas farmer’s cost of protecting cattle is increased (shed, guarding).
As a consequence the availability of manure is dwindling resulting in increased use of fertilizers and
less fuel for cooking. Since there is no exclusive area for grazing of bovine animals; they graze the
livestock in the paddy fields (for a short period) after harvest of Boro crops. There is no practice of
growing fodder crops in the area.
12. Biodiversity
According to the local people biodiversity of the study area was rich once upon a time. Due to the
different types of anthropogenic factors the trend of aquatic flora and fauna are decreasing. Some
endangered and threatened species name of SIP-17-18 areas are given in the following table.
Table 11: Biodiversity of SIP-17-18, some threatened and endangered species uses local name
Biodiversity Threatened species Endangered species
Terrestrial fauna kokka, bhuban chil and Shonkha chil bon biral,/bagdasha, ghulo,
badur and kathbirali
Wood species chambal, chatka, lombu, gab and tentul somrail and uri aam
Fruit trees bel, koramcha, kamranga, jalpai, chalita and
dalim
Aesthetic plants ashok and kamini
Herb kumari lata
Reptiles species kanon and ghormoni ghorial
Amphibians kola beng, gecho beng,
mecho beng
Source: Field Survey
ANNEX – D
SOCIO ECONOMY, GENDER AND LIVELIHOOD
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
1
Asian Development Bank Government of the Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh Kingdom of The Netherlands
_________________________________________________________________________
Gender and Livelihood Enhanced Perspective (GLEP)
SIP # SWC – 18 (Noagram - Gajaria Scheme)
SOUTHWEST AREAIntegrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project
Bangladesh Water Development Board
SOUTHWEST AREAIntegrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project
Bangladesh Water Development Board
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
2
Summary Gender and Livelihood are two complementary aspects of the SAIWRPMP project. The gender aspect relates to involvement of women in water management organizations. As women are socially suppressed by men, in order to protect their rights, at least 30% of the seats of the managing committee of the WMG and WMA shall be allocated for women as per the guideline for participatory water management (GPWM). In these seats only women candidates are allowed to compete in the election. The project should make it their regular activity to empower women in water management sector. The Project will support WMGs / project beneficiaries through PMO / SMO / Line Agencies / NGOs / LGIs with institutional strengthening gender concerns to ensure sustainability as gender is a cross-cutting issue. In these aspects, the situation of poverty, gender & livelihood enhancement and other related social issues were studied through primary data enumeration & FGD for the Noagram-Gajaria Scheme (SIP # SWC – 18) with the newly recruitment facilitator & fine tuned through Research Assistant, during the project between the periods 2008 and April-May, 2011. The objectives of the study is to asses the current poverty & livelihood status, gender & livelihood and Socio-economic situation of the targeted beneficiaries, specially those families and vulnerable women who will be directly or indirectly involved or influenced by the water resource management program of the project. The study was carried out using Participatory Rapid Rural Appraisal (PRRA) method and house to house Households survey under the overall supervision of the concerned persons of the projects Gender & Livelihood Component. The study techniques applied were HHs Survey and Focus Group Discussion (FGD) with marginal farmers, Landless, Share croppers and farm workers group, women’s group and occupational group like fishermen; Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) specially interviewing the formal / informal leaders of community and Local Governments Institutes (LGI), large farmers, businessmen and concerned officials of the governments and non-governments organizations (NGOs). A household survey was also carried out to identity poor and non-poor population per house holds by collecting data on income and expenditure and other basic socio-economic condition. The appraisal on gender & social issues and livelihood look after the demand of the poor and vulnerable women. To get a picture of real socio-economic situation an inventory of households was made in the subunit area on their land ownership, occupational activities, approximate income and expenditure, other family assets (cattle, households farming, non framing equipment etc.), and gender concerns. HHs survey shows that there are 2929 (92%) male headed and 250 (8%) female headed house holds in the area. Out of total HHs also shows the following Landless (1424) 45%, Marginal (732) 23%, Small (522) 16%, Medium (368) 12% and Large (133) 4% HHs in the area. Basically Farmers dimension of land indicate in the area. It was found that about (6602) 39 % of the HHs population lives below poverty line (National average as per BBS 2005 40%). They belong to landless and some of them marginal & small farmers including sharecroppers who cannot meet the required expenditure on food, clothing, healthcare, child education etc. Their main constraints appeared to be very small size of land holding, less job opportunity and low wages (for women less job opportunity and 30% less earnings than men in the same job), and absence of private and public investments (SME or any industry) in the SIP area. The present government safety net programs (VGD, VGF, Old Age, and Widow Allowances) are perceived as inadequate. In the SIP there were 54 poor Female headed HHs who are vulnerable and destitute. All vulnerable women and approximately 30% poor HHs are covered by VGF, VGD, Old age and Widow allowances (Tk. 300.00 - 350.00 per month) under safety net support. The amounts they get are not sufficient to maintain expense of livelihood. Household survey shows that 16730 household’s members including 8557 (51%) male and 8173 (49%) female population live in 13 villages within the subunit area. However, final selection to involve the poor in livelihood enhancement activities (Gender awareness training, technical skill and business training and follow-up training) will be finalized by the selection committees (Representative of WMG, LGI, NGO, PMO / SMO) after formation of the WMG. The final decision will be as per the Managing Committee and project authority’s decision. It is expected that finally selected beneficiaries by the project could be minimum 30% if this total number of poor or approx. Minimum 990 poor women beneficiaries including poor women as target group for their livelihood enhancement (allocation based
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
3
on DPP budget and other probable reason is that the committee may not find beneficiaries among the poor who will be able to fulfill the criteria such as interest for training, give time for training, limit of working age 18-50 years, pregnant and lactating mother, ability to invest in business by taking loan etc). It is expected that the proposed livelihood enhancement activities will be undertaken by the remaining beneficiaries through social induced method (adopting some new idea / activity / technology by following the others). Poor Households including vulnerable women living under the poverty line will be able to participate in a variety of income generating activities. A number of such activities are homestead vegetables gardening, seed production, quick growing fruit tree plantation at homestead and timber tree plantation by the roadside and embankment, mini nursery, agri-business, food processing specially rice based food processing (puffed rice, rice ball, toffee, pressed rice), fish cum duck farming including mini hatchery, home based bamboo work, home based jute work and pottery etc. A selection of them will be offered to the beneficiaries, after selection, skill training will be provided to them on relevant activities along with post training support including market linkages. This part of the program will ensure sufficient income for the poor and vulnerable women to reduce their poverty. It was identified that on the two sides of the embankment there are some khash land. This khas land is proposed to be distributed / leasing out to the vulnerable poor women and hard core poor families through establishing linkages with Department of land, local UNO / Upazila parishad, DC and LGIs. Another scope to benefit the hardcore poor and vulnerable women is to involve them in project construction works like canal digging, earth works in connection with embankment through Labour Contracting Society (LCS). The project should take advantage of utilizing local resources and institutions to assist poor for poverty reduction, Facilitating links with other organizations and institutions, such as DAE, DWA, DOF, DOLA, DOC, DSS, DOFT, LGED, DOYD and concerned NGO for specialized skill training and micro credit / SME loan from local banks (10% quota for women entrepreneur, policy imposed by Bangladesh Bank for all Banks), is a part of this effort. One tool has been development to facilitate this process: The Venn diagram analyzes the role of different micro finance institutes. Especially the poor and the vulnerable members of the committees will be monitored in order to see if they benefit from new opportunities under the project, or become marginalized further and would need especial supporting measures by targeting individuals.
Objectives The objectives of the study are: To asses the livelihood status of the targeted beneficiaries specially water resources management
families and vulnerable women; To support project targeted beneficiaries specially the poor to enhance their livelihood and poverty
reduction;
Methodology As mentioned earlier the methodology followed to conduct the study is House holds Survey and participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA). The most important techniques of PRA are Focus Group Discussion (FGD); Key Informant Interviews (KIIs), survey and case study have been chosen and applied to conduct this study.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
4
1. Location SIP # SWC - 18 (Noagram-Gajaria Scheme) of Chenchuri Beel sub-project is located in 2 Unions (Purulia and Peruli) of Kalia Upazila under Narail District. 13 villages from these Two Unions are associated (fully or partly) within this SIP # SWC - 18. SIP # SWC - 18 is popularly known as Liner khal (canal) area and bounded by the river Chitra to the east and the Afra to the west.
2. Introduction Bangladesh Water Development Board has given highest priority to poverty reduction in its development efforts. SAIWRPM project is fully aware of the presence of all pervasive and endemic gender based discriminations and depravations in all social and economic levels, among all castes, religions, and ethnic groups in both poor and non poor beneficiaries of the project area. Bangladesh Water Development Board (BWDB) under the Ministry of Water Resource (MoWR) started the implementation the project “Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project (SAIWRPMP)” from 2007 with financial and technical assistance from Asian Development Bank and Royal Netherlands Government. The overall objective of the project is to reduce poverty by increasing agricultural and fish production and employment creation through integrated water management (Flood Control, Drainage and Irrigation) with active participation of the local people. The project focuses need based issues of engineering and technical matters of water management, environment, water management institution/group and association, agriculture and fishery, gender, poverty and livelihood enhancement to achieve its objectives.
One of the objectives of the project is to enhance the livelihood of the poor living within the project area. Provision has therefore been kept within the project frame work to utilize project resources for implementing activities needed to achieve this objective. For this purpose the project felt the need to carry out a study on poverty and livelihood in the selected project area as a preparatory activity for gathering information on key issues of poverty and livelihood. This is extremely needed to make plan and formulate strategies for the implementation of livelihood enhancement activities for the poor. This study is the outcome of project’s primary step to start implementation process on livelihood enhancement for the poor. While in all implementation stage the project decided to ensure people’s participation as a key implementation strategy, this study followed the method of participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA). At the first stage the study has been undertaken at Kalia Upazila of Narail District. The projected present population is 16730 part of which male 8557 (51%) and female 8173 (49%) based line based on enumeration of 2008 and April-May, 2011. According to survey data the total population of the surveyed households is 3179 part of which male headed HHs 2929 and female headed HHs 250. The average household size of the SIP area is 5.26, which is much greater than the national average of 4.8. So, field survey showed a positive link of family size with income; landless, marginal, small, medium and large farmer category identification on quantity of land. The section deals primarily with the clientele or the stakeholders of different classes in the project area and its main socio-economic characteristics.
2.1 List of villages in SIP SIP # SWC – 18 of Chenchuri Beel Sub-project comprises 13 Villages are fully or partly at 2 Unions of Kalia Upazila under Narail districts. Total area is 1471 ha; figure as showing is table 2.1.1.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
5
Table – 2.1.1 : List of Villages in SIP
Sl. No.
Name of Village Union Upazilla District Remarks
1 Dariaghata Purulia Kalia Narail
2 Fuldah Purulia Kalia Narail
3 Amtola Purulia Kalia Narail
4 Kalamonkhali Purulia Kalia Narail
5 Bajebabra Purulia Kalia Narail
6 Noagram Purulia Kalia Narail
7 Diadanga Purulia Kalia Narail
8 Perbishnupur Purulia Kalia Narail
9 Burikhali Purulia Kalia Narail
10 Pervumbhag Purulia Kalia Narail
11 Perulicstan Peruli Kalia Narail
12 Sathbaria Peruli Kalia Narail
13 Patesswari Peruli Kalia Narail
Total 13 2 1 1 Source: HHs Survey, 2008 & 2011, SAIWRPMP, BWDB.
2.2 Population The projected total population according to HHs survey is 16730 of which male 8557 (51%) and 8173 (49%) female. Showing is table 2.2.1 and pie.
Table – 2.2.1 : Population and Sex Ratio
HHs Categories
Population No of HHs Male Female Total
Landless 3429 3314 6743 1424
Marginal 1955 1964 3919 732
Small 1488 1335 2823 522
Medium 1229 1098 2327 368
Large 456 462 918 133
Total 8557 8173 16730 3179 Source: HHs Survey, 2008 & 2011, SAIWRPMP, BWDB.
Sex Ratio of Population
Male
51%
Female
49%
Male Female
2.3 Adult population The projected total adult population according to HHs survey depicts that among the eligible (18 years & above) is 9737 of which male 5021 (52%) and 4716 (48%) female. Showing is table 2.3.1 and pie.
Table – 2.3.1 : Adult Population and Sex Ratio (18 years & above)
HHs Categories
Population No of HHs Male Female Total
Landless 1924 1881 3805 1424
Marginal 1202 1077 2279 732
Small 954 846 1800 522
Medium 658 644 1302 368
Large 283 268 551 133
Total 5021 4716 9737 3179 Source: HHs Survey, 2008 & 2011, SAIWRPMP, BWDB.
Sex Ratio of Adult Population
Male
52%
Femal
e
48%
Male Female
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
6
2.4 House holds The Present situation of projected that total HHs / Family according to HHs survey is 3179 of which male headed HHs 2929 (92%) and 250 (8%) female headed HHs. Maximum HHs are male headed showing is table 2.4.1 and pie.
Table – 2.4.1 : Male and Female headed HHs and Population
Name of Village
Population HHs
Male Female Total Male Headed
HHs Female Headed
HHs Total HHs
Dariaghata 396 374 770 139 3 142
Fuldah 644 606 1250 234 8 242
Amtola 767 758 1525 261 21 282
Kalamonkhali 546 506 1052 199 6 205
Bajebabra 476 459 935 134 29 163
Noagram 1388 1345 2733 475 63 538
Diadanga 654 657 1311 214 24 238
Perbishnupur 1447 1356 2803 500 50 550
Burikhali 395 394 789 135 14 149
Pervumbhag 362 327 689 110 17 127
Perulicstan 481 482 963 179 6 185
Sathbaria 540 515 1055 192 3 195
Patesswari 461 394 855 157 6 163 Total 8557 8173 16730 2929 250 3179
Source: HHs Survey, 2008 & 2011, SAIWRPMP, BWDB.
Male & Female Headed HHs Status
Male
Headed
HHs
92%
Female
Headed
HHs
8%
Male Headed HHs Female Headed HHs
2.5 Population of HHs Size Ratio The Present situation confirmed is observation that the average size of large farmer HHs is also bigger than that of the landless and marginal farmer’s families. Showing is table 2.5.1 and figure of column.
Table – 2.5.1 : Population of HHs Size Ratio
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
7
Land owner Categories
Population No of HHs
HHs Size
Male Female Total
Landless 3429 3314 6743 1424 4.74
Marginal 1955 1964 3919 732 5.35
Small 1488 1335 2823 522 5.41
Medium 1229 1098 2327 368 6.32
Large 456 462 918 133 6.90
Total / Avg. 8557 8173 16730 3179 5.26 Source: HHs Survey, 2009 & 2011, SAIWRPMP, BWDB.
Status of HHs Size
5.266.906.325.415.354.74
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
Landless M arginal Small M edium Large Total /
Avg.
2.6 Age Structure Presents the age structure of the population in the house holds survey and this data is perhaps more intriguing. Available age status information showing is table 2.6.1 and pie.
Table – 2.6.1 : Age Structure of HHs Member
Age
Group
Population
Male Female Total
1 - 17 3304 3145 6449
18 - 45 3593 3488 7081
46 - 60 1182 1047 2229
61 + 478 493 971
Total 8557 8173 16730 Source: HHs Survey, 2008 & 2011, SAIWRPMP, BWDB.
Age Structure of Population
0 - 17
39%
18 - 45
42%
46 - 60
13%
61 +
6%
0 - 17
18 - 45
46 - 60
61 +
2.7 HHs category of Land Land man relationships are immensely important in agriculture. The tenure arrangement influences the whole production system significantly. Main socio-economic condition dimension category of per farmer land identity. 5 kinds of farmer / Family / HHs are very clearly showing at table 2.7.1 and pie. Maximum HHs is landless (45%) and marginal (23%). Basically this overview is very strong and respectively.
Table – 2.7.1 : HHs category of Land owner basis under the village
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
8
Name of Village HHs Category of Land
Total Landless Marginal Small Medium Large
Dariaghata 78 15 18 15 16 142
Fuldah 85 60 45 41 11 242
Amtola 129 59 41 38 15 282
Kalamonkhali 89 46 35 22 13 205
Bajebabra 45 49 39 19 11 163
Noagram 228 118 87 72 33 538
Diadanga 116 44 55 18 5 238
Perbishnupur 258 128 88 63 13 550
Burikhali 71 47 17 12 2 149
Pervumbhag 63 30 16 12 6 127
Perulicstan 110 37 16 19 3 185
Sathbaria 96 48 28 20 3 195
Patesswari 56 51 37 17 2 163
Total 1424 732 522 368 133 3179 Source: HHs Survey, 2008 & 2011, SAIWRPMP, BWDB.
HHs Category of Land Large
4%
Medium
12%
Small
16%
Marginal
23%
Landless
45%
Landless Marginal Small Medium Large
2.8 Male & Female headed HHs category of Land The survey data shows that some landless and marginal female headed HHs is stated in the area. Basically in attendance are poor female families. Obtainable figure is show at table - 2.8.1 and pie.
Table – 2.8.1 : HHs Category of Land owner basis in Male & Female headed HHs in the area
Name of
Village
Category of Land Owner Total Total
HHs
Landless Farmer (0-49
Dec)
Marginal Farmer (50-
120 Dec)
Small Farmer (121-247 Dec)
Medium Farmer (248-
500 Dec)
Large Farmer ( > 501)
No. of HHs
Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female
Dariaghata 76 2 15 0 17 1 15 0 16 0 139 3 142
Fuldah 79 6 58 2 45 0 41 0 11 0 234 8 242
Amtola 124 5 53 6 35 6 34 4 15 0 261 21 282
Kalamonkhali 86 3 44 2 34 1 22 0 13 0 199 6 205
Bajebabra 35 10 42 7 33 6 15 4 9 2 134 29 163
Noagram 203 25 96 22 75 12 68 4 33 0 475 63 538
Diadanga 98 18 39 5 54 1 18 0 5 0 214 24 238
Perbishnupur 228 30 116 12 82 6 61 2 13 0 500 50 550
Burikhali 65 6 42 5 15 2 11 1 2 0 135 14 149
Pervumbhag 51 12 28 2 14 2 11 1 6 0 110 17 127
Perulicstan 105 5 37 0 16 0 18 1 3 0 179 6 185
Sathbaria 93 3 48 0 28 0 20 0 3 0 192 3 195
Patesswari 53 3 51 0 37 0 14 3 2 0 157 6 163
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
9
Total 1296 128 669 63 485 37 348 20 131 2 2929 250 3179 Source: HHs Survey, 2008 & 2011, SAIWRPMP, BWDB.
Category of Land Owner
4%1%
11%
15%
2% 21% 4%
41%
0.07%
1.17%
Landless Farmer (0-49 Dec) M ale
Landless Farmer (0-49 Dec) Female
M arginal Farmer (50-120 Dec) M ale
M arginal Farmer (50-120 Dec) Female
Small Farmer (121-247 Dec) M ale
Small Farmer (121-247 Dec) Female
M edium Farmer (248-500 Dec) M ale
M edium Farmer (248-500 Dec) Female
Large Farmer ( > 501) M ale
Large Farmer ( > 501) Female
2.9 Occupation Status Occupation indicates sources of income from work, time spent in work as well as social status. Table shows the main households occupation. Agriculture farming is the main occupation of all categories of farmers. Wage / Daily labourers are mostly found in landless, marginal and small farm families. Trade and business as family occupation is found in all level farmer. IGA is very importance of livelihood development. But IGA is very atypical of found in all level farmer. Also actual fisherman is very exceptional. Maximum populations are being used HHs work and students. The table - 2.9.1 and pie shows in all occupational figures.
Table – 2.9.1 : Occupation of Respondent population in the area
Occupation Categories HHs Category
Total Landless Marginal Small Medium Large
Agri. Farmer 1811 1104 532 349 162 3958
Fisherman 35 24 17 7 1 84
Partial Fisherman 19 29 35 19 12 114
Day Labour 618 312 274 214 12 1430
Transport Worker 247 138 73 82 14 554
Service Holder 214 197 154 161 147 873
Traders / Businessmen 104 48 46 67 44 309
Student 1354 972 576 512 207 3621
HHs Works 1795 833 747 695 180 4250
IGA 15 9 8 5 4 41
Destitute / Vulnerable Women 48 4 2 0 0 54
Others 483 249 359 216 135 1442
Total 6743 3919 2823 2327 918 16730 NB : IGA = (Handicrafts, Embroidery, Poultry, B. fattening, V. Gardening, Cow rearing, Duck farming, Livestock, Nursery, Hatchery etc.)
NB : Day Labour =(Daily Wage labour, Rajmistri, Daily Agri. Farmer, Carpenters, Blacksmith, Barber, Tailor, Potterman, Hawker, Electrician etc.)
NB : Transport Worker = ( Ricksaw, Van, Bus, Track, Boat, Launch, Tempu, Grambangla & others Driver etc.)
NB : Others = ( Infant, Unemployed, Beggar & Old etc.)
NB.: Service Holder = (GOB, NGO & Private etc.)
Source: HHs Survey, 2008 & 2011, SAIWRPMP, BWDB.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
10
Main Occupational Status Agri Farmer
24%
Fisherman
0.50% Partial Fisherman
1%
Day Labour
9% Transport
Worker
3%
Service Holder
5% Traders /
Businessmen
2%
Student
22%
HHs Works
24%
IGA
0.24%
Destitute /
Vulnerable
Women
0.33%
Others
9%
Agri Farmer Fisherman Partial FishermanDay Labour Transport Worker Service Holder Traders / Businessmen Student HHs WorksIGA Destitute / Vulnerable Women Others
Table – 2.9.2 : Assessment of fishing community
Fishermen social position Present profession
Hose Hold Type
HHs Nos
Caste Nos of
member Fishermen Farmer
Fish trading/ Gher/Labour
Full time
fishing
Part time
fishing
Traditional Hindu
fishermen HH 15 Hindu 45 30 6 9
84 114 Non Traditional
Muslim fishermen HH
52 Muslim 156 54 18 81
Fifteen (15) nos traditional fishermen households exists in this sub–unit area since about 8th generation, all are of Hindu religion and social order is in the name of Rajbongshi and also fifty two (52) nos non-traditional Muslim fishermen households exists in this area. Now most of the fishermen have changed their profession in course of time due to lack of open water fish in the river, beel and khals having less availability of fish due to over fishing. Some fishermen are now engaged in agriculture, catching fish in the beel during monsoon, some time caching fish in Gher (Close water fishing inland) on hire and fish trading. Most of the fishermen families are becoming affluent day by day; they are taking education and trying to live a better life. As per field data about 12% of professional fisher men are connected with agriculture, they catch fish in the beel during monsoon and also catch fish in Gher (Close water fishing) on hire; about 45 % of traditional & non-traditional fishermen are engaged in culture fish production, fish trading and labour and about 42% of traditional fishermen are fishing in khal and river, fishing in beel during monsoon and fishing in Gher (Close water fishing) on hire. In this area some Muslim and Hindu fishermen ( Total=114 nos) are also catching fish in beel area during monsoon period, actually they are farmer, daily labourers, Rickshaw Pooler etc. They have been shown as part time fishermen. So there have no adverse impact in the traditional Hindu fishermen community.
2.10 Poor / Non Poor population
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
11
Figure at table – 2.10.1 and pie summarize the monthly per capita income for the various groups of farmers families in the project area. Maximum Small, Large, medium and marginal farming HHs population income is normally indication of Non poor but landless HHs population 67% is poor. Table – 2.10.1 : Poor/Non poor population identification Per Capita Income/ monthly in the area
Type HHs Category
Total Landless % Marginal % Small % Medium % Large %
Poor 4522 67.06 1081 27.58 508 18.00 403 17.32 88 9.59 6602
Non Poor
2221 32.94 2838 72.42 2315 82.00 1924 82.68 830 90.41 10128
Total 6743 100 3919 100 2823 100 2327 100 918 100 16730
NB : Poor = ( Per capita monthly Tk. 742 < ) and Non Poor = ( Per capita monthly Tk. 742 > ) . Source: HHs Survey, 2008 & 2011, SAIWRPMP, BWDB.
Poor and Non Poor Status
Poor
39%
Non
Poor
61%
Poor
Non
Poor
2.11 Educational Status
In the project area the literacy rate is 76% which part of the male literacy rate is 40% and the female literacy rate is 36% against the national average of 65%. Figure showing the table 2.11.1 and pie of primary level, junior secondary, Secondary, Higher Secondary, Graduate, Self taught and Illiterates data & % figure are presented.
Table – 2.11.1 : Educational Attainment
Education Status
Literacy Rate (%)
Total Male Female
No % No %
Primary (Class I - V) 2718 31.8 2534 31.0 5252
Junior Secondary (Class VI - VIII) 1154 13.5 1247 15.3 2401
Secondary and Equivalent 793 9.3 776 9.5 1569
Higher Secondary and Equivalent 482 5.6 427 5.2 909
Graduate / Post Graduate and Equivalent 172 2.0 83 1.0 255
Literacy Course / Self taught 1386 16.2 1022 12.5 2408
Illiterate 1852 21.6 2084 25.5 3936
Total 8557 100% 8173 100% 16730 Source: HHs Survey, 2008 & 2011, SAIWRPMP, BWDB.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
12
Literacy Rate
Fema
le
36%
Illiter
ate
24%
Male
40%
Male
Female
Illiterate
Educational Status
32%
14%
9%5%
2%
14%
24%
Primary (Class I - V)
Junior Secondary (Class
VI - VIII)
Secondary and
Equivalent
Higher Secondary and
Equivalent
Graduate / Post Graduate
and Equivalent
Literacy Course / Self
taught
Illiterate
2.12 Housing Characteristics In earlier days the roof of a house most prominently depicted the socio-economic status of household in society. But with the paucity of availability of straw / bamboo / katcha and difficulty in maintenance, the poor and non poor also have gone for tin / CI sheet / semi brick wall roofing of the main house. The data shows that figure in the table – 2.12.1 and pie are offered in the present situation at the SIP area.
Table – 2.12.1 : Main Housing Characteristics of HHs
Type of Roof HHs Category
Total Landless Marginal Small Medium Large
Pucca 32 41 47 37 33 190
Semi Pucca 172 145 158 92 34 601
Tin + Bamboo 936 398 263 221 66 1884
Jute Stick + Straw 158 84 24 3 0 269
Kacha 55 30 12 7 0 104
Others 71 34 18 8 0 131
Total 1424 732 522 368 133 3179 Source: HHs Survey, 2008 & 2011, SAIWRPMP, BWDB.
Housing Characteristics status
Others
4%Kacha
3%
Jute Stick +
Straw
8%
Tin + Bamboo
60%
Semi Pucca
19%
Pucca
6%
Pucca Semi Pucca Tin + Bamboo Jute Stick + Straw Kacha Others
2.13 Sanitation Status
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
13
The toilet facilities for discharging of human waste are important element for healthy and hygienic environment of households. The use of sanitary latrine has improved tremendously over the last decades. The present important Figure showing the table – 2.13.1 and pie.
Table – 2.13.1 : Access to Sanitation of the HHs in the SIP area
Type of Latrine HHs Category
Total Landless Marginal Small Medium Large
Sanitary / Pucca 71 72 74 115 38 370
Ring Slub 1153 529 382 200 81 2345
Katcha / Hanging 144 86 45 38 11 324
Open 56 45 21 15 3 140
Total 1424 732 522 368 133 3179 Source: HHs Survey, 2008 & 2011, SAIWRPMP, BWDB.
Sanitation Status
Sanitary /
Pucca
12%
Ring Slub
74%
Katcha /
Hanging
10%
Open
4%
Sanitary / Pucca Ring Slub Katcha / Hanging Open
2.14 Drinking Water Status Due to acute scarcity of drinking Water the local people use more than one source for drinking purpose. Table – 2.14.1 and figure of pie shows that in the project area. 95% people are drinking of tube well water, but it is not tested.
Table – 2.14.1 : Sources of drinking water of the HHs within the SIP area
Type HHs Category
Total Landless Marginal Small Medium Large
Tube well 1367 701 486 346 128 3028
Pond / khals / rivers 41 14 11 4 0 70
Others 16 17 25 18 5 81
Total 1424 732 522 368 133 3179 Source: HHs Survey, 2008 & 2011, SAIWRPMP, BWDB.
Sources of Drinking Water
Tube
well
95%
Pond /
khals /
rivers
2%
Others
3%
Tube w ell Pond / khals / rivers Others
2.14.2 Arsenic Contamination circumstances
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
14
It is found that test of arsenic contamination of HTWs of both the sampled villages of SIP-18 has been carried out by DPHE between 2003 and 2006, total number of HTWs are being about 500, although there is no report of arsenic-contaminated HTW in the area. An NGO, namely Ullashi, Sreejoni, imparted awareness training on adverse affects of drinking arsenic contaminated water during 2007. The study area people commented that the water contain fewer quantity saline and iron component in the HTW. In order to mitigate SAIWRPMP will provide some deep tube well to the arsenic affected villages according to their agreement. SAIWRPM project will be provided a deep tube well per WMG to mitigate arsenic for drinking water.
2.15 Present Health Status Table – 2.15.1 shows the common disease of the SIP area. Modern medical facilities are not available to large population. For many people the medical facilities are far away and difficult to reach. The health condition of the people in the project area is generally poor. It is found from the sample households that the landless and marginal farmer mostly suffer from water borne disease. The common disease are Gastric, Diarrhea / Dysentery, Influenza / Cough, Jaundice, Pain in Hip / Back etc. figure and % showing the pie.
Table – 2.15.1 : Most common Diseases mentioned by Respondents
Type of Disease HHs Category Total
Landless Marginal Small Medium Large No
Gastric 332 209 175 86 38 840
Diarrhea / Dysentery 268 56 46 23 6 399
Influenza / Cough 401 162 167 120 41 891
Pain in Hip / Back 212 143 52 87 31 525
Jaundice 31 13 8 12 3 67
Others 142 92 42 31 13 320
Diseases Free 38 57 32 9 1 137
Total 1424 732 522 368 133 3179 Source: HHs Survey, 2008 & 2011, SAIWRPMP, BWDB.
Main Disease of Respondent
Gastric
26%
Diarrhea /
Dysentery
13%
Influenza /
Cough
28%
Pain in Hip /
Back
17%
Jaundice
2%
Others
10%
Disease Free
4%
Gastric Diarrhea / Dysentery Influenza / Cough Pain in Hip / Back Jaundice OthersDisease Free
2.16 Electricity Coverage Status Out of total house holds maximum respondents answered to the question. Among them 39% HHs mentioned they have electricity connection in their houses. And 61% HHs they have no electricity connection in their houses. Show the table – 2.16.1 and pie.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
15
Table – 2.16.1 : Electricity coverage according to per HHs
Electricity Status
HHs Category Total No Landless Marginal Small Medium Large
Yes 416 319 254 174 75 1238
No 1008 413 268 194 58 1941
Total 1424 732 522 368 133 3179 Source: HHs Survey, 2008 & 2011, SAIWRPMP, BWDB.
Electricity Coverage
No
61%
Yes
39% Yes
No
3. Findings of the Study Some of the Key findings followed House Holds survey study analyzed below:
The area is connected by a semi paved and unpaved road through which only light transport vehicle (rickshaw/ van/ bicycle) and occasionally light motor van move. Due to constraints in resources and time only the household heads / members were interview on their quantity of land, education, occupation, income and assets etc. owned by them. In the synthesized socio economic data of 13 villages of the SIP has been presented. This gives some insight on general socio economic conditions of the people living under the Hydrological Unit or SIP # SWC – 18. Analysis of these data was supported by Households Survey, field observation report and FGDs. Both data and its analysis were made gender disaggregated. The table shows that 42% populations are within the age 18-45. This demographic situation indicates the existence of a very good number of working age population within the SIP area. Their labour and skills may be utilized for the socio economic development of people living within the SIP area. The average literacy rate although 76% its distribution is more within self taught to post graduate, primary (32%) followed by 14% within VI-VIII / Junior secondary, 9% Secondary, 14% Self taught and illiterate is 24%. This indicates also a large percentage of school dropouts especially among poor community. Probably it is the personal initiative that they themselves took this skill training from Government and Non Government Organizations. But this is not a sufficient number to build human capital for socio economic and livelihood development. The project cans intervene in this area at least with a program of skill and business training. Such intervention will contribute to develop socio economic condition and livelihoods of people. The project should also undertake advocacy and awareness creation program to give most basic education under adult no formal education program in collaboration with local elected bodies or through WMA to its beneficiaries. The same is with other social indicators. For example occupation of highest number of people is Agri farming (24%) followed by small trade/ business (2%), actual + partial fishermen (1.24%), day labour (9%), Transport worker (3%) Service holder in GOB, NGO and private organization (5%), Student (22%), IGA (0.24%), HHs / family works (25%) and Destitute / Vulnerable (0.33%) are also included. The encouraging fact is that the others (infant, old and unemployment) rate is 9% and maximum women are involved in HHs or family work. So, it is big fact of development in the area. Various IGA training is very essential in the area. The project should address this issue by creating alternative employment.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
16
The income shows that more than 39% of families population monthly income less than Tk. 742, to meet their basic requirement (food, cloth etc) which indicate that they are living below poverty line And 61% families population monthly income more then Tk. 742 which indicate that they are living upper poverty line. As per study the House Hold Survey mentioned by gender and livelihood disaggregated. This means medium poverty exists in the SIP area. Poverty reduction measure is therefore a justified intervention by the project. This figure is secure to national average (44.3% as per BBS 2005 sample survey) which justifies the validity of data and also justifies the fact that one of the causes of poverty is landlessness. The project should therefore undertake alternative livelihood enhancement activities to reduce the poverty of landless poor. Indicators on household structure show a little bit better living condition both for poor and non poor including female headed households. 60% of households have houses with Tin + Bamboo and 8% of HHs they have houses in Jute stick & straw roofing. Maximum poor / non poor are included in this figure. 19% of HHs has houses with semi pucca (Brick wall + Tin) roofing. Maximum large and medium non poor HHs is included in this figure. On drinking water it is encouraging. Almost 95% including poor and non poor have access to safe drinking water / tube well. In case of sanitation it is worst. 74% HHs have water sealed Ring slub latrine, 12% sanitary latrine, 10% Katcha / hanging and 4% open latrine. The project through WMG should address this issue with technical support from district public health engineering department. Temporary Migration for Employment and Income: This is both a social and an economic problem a large number of families / HHs, approximately 50% FGD members thinkable 0.5% people of out migrate to Bombay, India, UAE, Saudi Arab, Qatar, Quet, Malaysia, Singapore, Korea illegally for hard work (men find work in construction and women in rich men’s house as maid) for a year or two and return with Tk. 30000-35000. They invest this money to construct a house or to buy other asset or to repay loan. 30% of them are harassed by broker, police etc and return with penniless. Some time they remain in jail for several months. Cases of trafficking are reported but not significantly (even less than 1%). The men of these poor families work as illegal worker in construction site and the women work as house maid. Some women also work as construction worker. Such illegal migration is not acceptable. This could only be reduced if the project creates alternative employment opportunities for them. In spite of low illiteracy rate and poor base of physical and human capital / assets, existing natural resources / Beel / canal / river / water may be utilized through better management to improve livelihood of poor community. Intervention by this project through construction / rehabilitation of water structure for an efficient water resource management along with other alternative opportunities will definitely contribute to create more employment and improve livelihood through increased cropping intensity and its yield and an increased fish production which ultimately improve the social and economic condition of people in the SIP area.
4. Focus Group Discussion for the Need Assessment of Gender and Livelihood Enhancement Activities The objectives of the study is to asses the current poverty & livelihood status, gender & livelihood and Socio-economic situation of the targeted beneficiaries, specially those families and vulnerable women who will be directly or indirectly involved or influenced by the water resource management program of the project. The study was carried out using Participatory Rapid Rural Appraisal (PRRA) method under the overall supervision of the concerned persons of the projects Gender & Livelihood Component. The study techniques applied were Focus Group Discussion (FGD) with marginal farmers, Landless, Share croppers and farm workers group, women’s group and occupational group like fishermen; Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) specially interviewing the formal / informal leaders of community and Local Governments Institutes (LGI), large farmers, businessmen and concerned officials of the governments and non-governments organizations (NGOs).
5. Location of FGD
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
17
Eight Focus Group Discussion (FGD) were held in the project area and a number of Key Informants Interviews (KIIs) were carried under the study. These provided perception of the communities about the existing water resources with regard to irrigation, drainage condition and flood hazards, and their ideas and priorities about the improvements needs.
At village level, discussion were held with different categories of people, ranging from farmers, fishermen, boatman, small traders, landless, destitute & vulnerable women, union level LGI, UP Chairman & Members, Religious leader, school teacher and others people.
Table – 5.1 : Place of Focus Group Discussion (FGD) SWC – 18
District Upazila Union Village Date Place Participants
Narail Kalia Purulia fuldah 19.11.2008 Fuldah Village 37
Narail Kalia Purulia Amtola 01.12.2008 Amtola Village 41
Narail Kalia Purulia Diadanga 16.12.2008 Diadanga Village 34
Narail Kalia Peruli Perulicstan 27.12.2008 Perulicstan Village 42
Narail Kalia Purulia Bajebabra 18.12.2008 Bajebabra Village 28
Narail Kalia Purulia Kalamonkhali 12.05.2011 Kalamonkhali Village 48
Narail Kalia Peruli Patesswari 23.05.2011 Exist. Regulator 35
Narail Kalia Purulia Noagram 24.05.2011 Noagram Village 38
1 1 2 8 Total 8 FGD 303
6. Poverty Poverty has been assessed in this study by making a monthly expenditure for basic need (food, clothing, children education and health care) survey for each individual HHs of villages within the SIP area. The number of poor or incidence of poverty is further validated by comparing with poverty information from Key Informants (Kls), FGDs and literature. 85 Kls or 218 FGD members are comments on poverty situation in this area. According to maximum KIs the incidence of poverty therefore is Acceptable ranges in this area. But according to maximum FGD member’s comments on the incidence of poverty therefore is very highly a range of acceptable in the area. The number of poor or incidence of poverty is further validated by comparing with poverty information from Key Informants (Kls), FGDs and literature. The information of poverty given by Kls and FGDs is given in following table.
Table 6.1 : Present Poverty Situation Ranking : More than 80% = 5 highly acceptable, 50-80% = 4 or acceptable, below 50% = 3 not acceptable)
Discussion matters
Comments of Kls or FGD members
No of Kls or FGD
members commented
Total No of Kls or FGD members
% Ranking
KIs : How is the poverty situation in the area?
Very high or above 75% 25 85 30% 3 or not
acceptable
High or within the range of 51% - 75% 51 85 60% 4 or
acceptable
Moderate or within the range of 35-49% 9 85 10% 3 or not
acceptable
FGDs : How is the poverty situation in the area?
Very high or above 75% 153 218 70% 4 or
acceptable
High or within the range of 51% - 75% 44 218 20% 3 or not
acceptable
Moderate or within the range 35-49% 22 218 10% 3 or not
acceptable
7. Causes of Poverty
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
18
These causes of high poverty as expressed by the majority participants of FGD and Kls 80% of Kls and 80% of FGD participants are very common, logical and justified. They are lack of employment, Decrease of cultivable land, low literacy rate and no facilities for skill development, lack of communication network, Marketing problem, Lack of Credit facilitates, Low wage rate of women and lack of seed & fertilizers problem.
These causes are logical and justified. However, the project has limitation to address all the causes. Project’s gender and poverty component may address the employment issues by undertaking tailored made skills training to promote income generating activities for the poor. The projects do not have approved resources allocation or provision to address the other causes directly. However increased fishery and crop production due to project intervention will create employment opportunities as a whole which will contribute to reduce poverty. The causes of poverty are relevant to local situation. Most interesting is that the people are aware of it. Their opinion is summarized in the following table:
Table- 7.1 : Causes of Poverty
Ranking : More than 80% = 5 highly acceptable, 50-80% = 4 or acceptable, below 50% = 3 not acceptable)
Discussion matters
Comments of Kls or FGD members No of Kls or
FGD members commented
Total No of Kls or FGD members
% Ranking
KIs : What do you think what could be the possible causes of so high or high poverty?
Decrease the cultivable land, Lack of employment, low wage, irrigation problem, agriculture seed & fertilizers problem, low literacy rate, Training & skill problem, inadequate credit facilities, lack of communication network.
68 85 80% 5 or highly acceptable
FGDs : What do you think what could be the possible causes of so high or high poverty?
Decrease the cultivable land, Lack of employment, low wage, irrigation problem, agriculture seed & fertilizers problem, low literacy rate, Training & skill problem, inadequate credit facilities, no industry. Marketing problem.
175 218 80% 5 or highly acceptable
8. Poverty Reduction According to most FGD participants and key informant skill training, VGD, Old age and Pregnant women allowances, awareness raising and road construction (road, bridge, canal etc.). Under took by the government, although in limited scale, contributed to increase employment opportunity for the people. Maximum number of KIs and FGD participants told that immunization and safe drinking water program implemented by the government agencies made an impact on poverty reduction. The team enquire these facts further by observation and discussing it informally with local people in market place and union parishad / local Govt. body and a few district level and Upazila level government officers like District Women affairs, Rural Development officer, Block Supervisor of DAE etc. who informed the team that government budget is extremely poor compare to need, size of area and number of people and therefore whatever development activities they implement, its impact are forgotten by the people quickly and its visibility disappear although it creates some impact at least on a few poor families
Government Organizations and its Impact Different agencies / department of government and NGOs implement development program aimed at reducing poverty directly or indirectly. The issue was discussed with the Key informants as they are
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
19
most aware of it and even involved with it. The following table summarizes their comment / opinion and also result.
Table – 8.1 : Poverty Reduction Program undertaken by the Government and non- Government Organizations and its impacts
Ranking : More than 80% = 5 highly acceptable, 50-80% = 4 or acceptable, below 50% = 3 not acceptable)
Discussion matters
Comments of Kls or FGD members
Comment on Impact
No of Kls / FGD
Participants
Total No of Kls or FGD members
% Ranking
KIs : Development Program undertaken by the government and NGOs in this SIP aimed at reducing poverty directly or indirectly.
Skill Training, VGD, Old age and pregnant women allowance, awareness raising and road construction (road, bridge, canal etc.)
Employment Increased
56 85 65% 4 or
acceptable
VGD, Old age and maternity allowances
Impact insignificant on poverty
60 85 70% 4 or
acceptable
Immunization and supply of safe drinking water
Contribute poverty
reduction 72 85 85%
5 or highly acceptable
FGDs : Development Program undertaken by the government and NGOs in this SIP aimed at reducing poverty directly or indirectly.
Skill Training, VGD, Old age and pregnant women allowance, awareness raising and road construction (road, bridge, canal etc.)
Employment Increased
131 218 60% 4 or
acceptable
VGD, Old age and maternity allowances
Impact insignificant on poverty
153 218 70% 4 or
acceptable
Immunization and supply of safe drinking water
Contribute poverty
reduction 185 218 85%
5 or highly acceptable
Government development program especially Skill training, VGD, Old age and pregnant women allowances, awareness raising and road construction (road, bridge, canal etc.). Although compare to the need it is inadequate it contribute to increase employment and reduce poverty. Immunization, supply of safe drinking water by tube well and family planning service did not contribute to reduce poverty directly, a one third of KIs and FGD participants made opinion that immunization and safe drinking water contribute to poverty reduction process by saving cost of health care and keeping the family size smaller. Transfer or adaptation of new improved agriculture technology and construction of new road linking to city town market place etc. can create tremendous impact on poverty reduction.
9. Gender Participation of situation Demand for Family / HHs Regarding the community level local people to present overall scenario about the participation of male and female members of different issues influencing the livelihood and position of different decision making on the area. The table on present scenario, indicates that the major components to dependent of men are very highly influencing, Participation at the HHs decision making to men and women are medium influencing, Participation at the community level decision to dependent of men are very highly influencing and Knowledge & awareness to men and women are low influencing of the area.
Table - 9.1 : Major Gender Dimension and Participation
Sl. No
Components / Factors Women Men
No L M H No L M H
1 Control over HHs resources (Land, Crop, Cow etc.) √ √
2 Mobility inside the community (relative, shop, group meeting etc.)
√ √
3 Mobility outside the community (market, labour, crop field, hospital, bank, fair, movie etc.)
√ √
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
20
4 Participation at the HHs Decision :
a. Decision to have new children √ √
b. Decision to undertake new economic activity √ √
c. Decision to purchase / sell of property √ √
d. Decision to children schooling √ √
e. Decision to children marriage √ √
f. Decision to buy inputs and daily essentials √ √
5 Participation at the Community Decision :
a. Participation in the Mosque / mondir committee √ √
b. Participation in village development activity √ √
c. Participation in school management committee √ √
d. Participation in village salish √ √
e. participation in union parishad √ √
6 Knowledge and Awareness :
a. Law related to marriage and divorce √ √
b. Law related to inheritance rights √ √
c. Legal process to torture and inhuman treatment √ √
NB : L = Low ; M = Medium ; H = High
10. Present Livelihood Situation in the area Livelihood is maintaining life with its basic means or food, shelter, clothing, health care, safe drinking water etc for which assets are required as described earlier in methodology. The issues on present livelihood situation were discussed with randomly by field facilitators especially with families appeared to be poor, landless and marginal and farmers. Poverty and livelihood relates closely in the way that if poverty reduce livelihood improves proportionately. Some assets like cattle, chicken etc. can be acquired by taking loan from NGOs which are now available. Land is expensive and acquiring it is difficult. Skills can be acquired by training and physical ability to work can be better utilized by creating employment opportunities against wage. It was also examined through Kls (FGD participants declined to comment on this issue) that for what purpose micro credit are being used. These are summarized as follows:
10.1 Impact of Micro Credit It was also examined through FGD and Kls whether micro credit creates an impact on livelihood enhancement and poverty reduction. Majorities of Kls (30%) and FGD participants (50%) who are users of micro credit gave opinion that micro credit help to increase income and improve livelihood. It is summarized as follows:
Table – 10.1.1 : Impact of Micro Credit on Livelihood Enhancement and Poverty Reduction Ranking : More than 80% = 5 highly acceptable, 50-80% = 4 or acceptable, below 50% = 3 not acceptable)
Discussion matters
Comments of Kls or FGD members No of Kls or
FGD commented
Total No of Kls or FGD members
% Ranking
Kls : How is micro credit helping in poverty alleviation?
Increasing income, improving livelihood, developing housing, increasing facilities of education and health care. Fish Farm, Beef fattening, Agri farming, Investment of small cottage & handicrafts.
26 85 30% 3 or not
acceptable
FGDs : How is micro credit helping in
Increasing income, improving livelihood, developing housing, increasing facilities of education and health care. Agriculture
109 218 50% 4 or
acceptable
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
21
poverty alleviation?
Investment.
10.2 Use of Micro Credit Majorities of Kls told that micro credit are being used for small business, crop cultivation, beef fattening and van purchase. 100% Kls and FGD participants told that NGOs are the biggest providers of micro credit. It is in fact true. Grameen Bank, BRAC, Proddipan, Banchte Shekha, Palli Dardro Foundation, Kalia Daridro Foundation, Gram Bangla, Sabuj Samity, Jagoroni Chakro Foundation, ASHA, and BRDB, Krishi Bank, Sonali Bank are also providing credit. The team however could not find its evidence in the area. Thus the role of micro credit can not be ignored for livelihood enhancement. According to most Kls its demand is high and continues to increase. The project should take this advantage. Through WMG they should take collective loan from the bank with low interest and distribute to marginal farmers, landless share croppers and other poor members of WMGs. Such provision now exists in all nationalized banks.
Table – 10.2.1 : Use of Micro Credit Ranking : More than 80% = 5 highly acceptable, 50-80% = 4 or acceptable, below 50% = 3 not acceptable)
Discussion matters
Comments of Kls No of Kls or
FGD commented
Total No of Kls or FGD members
% Ranking
Kls : what purpose are used of micro credit?
Small business, crop production, cow rearing, beef fattening, Poultry farming, livelihood expenditure, payment of loan, marriage of daughter, house preparation or repair.
67 85 80% 5 or highly acceptable
FGDs : what purpose are used of micro credit?
Small business, crop production, cow rearing, beef fattening, Poultry farming, livelihood expenditure, payment of loan, marriage of daughter, house preparation or repair.
196 218 90% 5 or highly acceptable
Key Findings of the Micro credit study Present livelihood is inadequate for most people of SIP area due to the possession of little amount of assets / land, cattle, chicken, skills, low wage etc and under utilization of health asset or physical ability to work. Land being an expensive asset is difficult to acquire by them or though external assistance. However, its productivity can be increased for more income by applying improved technology. Other assets like cattle, chicken, skills etc. can be acquired through generation of additional income, saving and external assistance (micro credit, grant etc.) for a better livelihood. The role of micro credit can not be ignored for livelihood enhancement. According to most Kls, demand of micro credit is high and continues to increase. The project should take this advantage. Through WMG they should take collective loan from the bank with low interest and distribute to marginal farmers, landless share croppers and other poor members of WMGs. Such provision now exists in all nationalized banks. The occupational group or fishermen and potters are facing difficulties to maintain livelihood due to reduction of fish population and increased price of potter’s raw materials. They need assistance through alternative employment creation. Inadequate livelihood created social problem like trafficking of women and children. Especially the poor women need alternative employment to improve their livelihood. Underutilized physical ability of most women may be utilized for income by creasing alternative employment opportunities (non farm).
11. Options for Livelihood Enhancement Activity
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
22
Identifying options to support the Livelihood enhancement of poor beneficiaries is one of the major objectives of this study. Related issues on different options of livelihood enhancement were discussed with FGD participants and KIs and the result is summarized in the following tables:
Income Generating Activity Present livelihood is Agricultural Income Generating Activities is small relevant but non farm income generating activities is not relevant of the area. Although the study team took opinion from KIs and FGD participants on possible IGAs, they verify these recommendations with local realities (resource owned by communities, capital supply, available land, market and credit facilities and institutional support). The team found that the following IGA are technically and economically feasible for the poor families. The team therefore recommended the following livelihoods enhancement for the identified poor families of the area.
Table – 11.1 : Income Generating Activities Situation Ranking : More than 80% = 5 highly acceptable, 50-80% = 4 or acceptable, below 50% = 3 not acceptable)
Discussion matters
Comments of Kls or FGD No of
Kls / FGD commented
Total No of Kls or FGD members
% Ranking
KIs : what are the agricultural Income Generating Activities of the Area?
Early HYV / Hybrid rice, pulse crop, Vegetables, Integrated Rice and Fish culture, Duck farming, Poultry, Cow & Goat rearing, Beef fattening, Seed processing, Food processing, Oil seeds,
17 85 20% 3 or not
acceptable
FGD : what are the agricultural Income Generating Activities of the Area?
Early HYV / Hybrid rice, pulse crop, Vegetables, Integrated Rice and Fish culture, Duck farming, Poultry, Cow & Goat rearing, Beef fattening, Seed processing, Food processing Oil seeds,
65 218 30% 3 or not
acceptable
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
23
KIs : what is the probable non farm Income Generating Activities in the area?
Home based jute industry, small business, case culture, organic fertilizer, food processing, masonry, Handicraft,
17 85 20% 3 or not
acceptable
FGDs : what is the probable non farm Income Generating Activities in the area?
Home based jute industry, small business, case culture, organic fertilizer, food processing, masonry, Handicraft; Home based bamboo work, Pottery.
44 218 20% 3 or not
acceptable
12. Expectation of the Project The team also carried out FGDs and KIs survey whether the proposed project may create options for their expectation of the project for livelihood enhancement. These are summarized below:
Table – 12.1 : Expectation / Support / Demand of the Local Area Ranking : More than 80% = 5 highly acceptable, 50-80% = 4 or acceptable, below 50% = 3 not acceptable)
Discussion matters
Comments of Kls or FGD No of Kls/
FGD commented
Total No of Kls or FGD members
% Ranking
Kls : What is your Expectation / support / demand?
Increase Income per capita & development
68 85 80% 4 or
acceptable
Increase Agriculture production
Increase small cottage & business Poverty reduction & social development
Education & Health sector development Infrastructure & Communication development Agriculture & Others Marketing
FGDs : What is your Expectation / support / demand?
Increase Income per capita & development
185 218 85% 4 or
acceptable
Increase Agriculture production
Increase small cottage & business Poverty reduction & social development
Education & Health sector development Infrastructure & financial development Agriculture & Others Marketing
Although the study team took opinion from KIs and FGD participants on possible for local beneficiary members demand of acceptable on Increase Income per capita, Agriculture production, small cottage & business, Poverty reduction & social mobilization, Education & Health sector development, Infrastructure & communication, and marketing of the area.
13. Services of GOB & NGO Structure Although the study team took opinion from KIs and FGD participants on present situation on services of GOB is very low (15%) and lack of demand of the area. But NGO supported is comparably is good because 35% - 45% people are involved any other NGO and others private credit organization.
Table – 13.1 : Present Services of GOB & NGO Ranking : More than 80% = 5 highly acceptable, 50-80% = 4 or acceptable, below 50% = 3 not acceptable)
Discussion matters
Comments of Kls No of
Kls / FGD commented
Total No of Kls or FGD members
% Ranking
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
24
Kls : what are the Service of GOB?
Bank, DAE, DOF, DWA, DOL, PWDB, BWDB, BRDB, BBS, LGI, UP, Upazila & District level all officials, Institutional, Educational & Health , IT services etc.
13 85 15% 3 or not
acceptable
FGDs : what are the Service of GOB?
Bank, DAE, DOF, DWA, DOL, PWDB, BWDB, BRDB, BBS, LGI, UP, Upazila & District level all officials, Institutional, Educational & Health, IT services etc.
44 218 20% 3 or not
acceptable
Kls : what are the Service of NGO?
Credit, Institutional service, Educational Service, Information Technology, Health & sanitation etc. services
30 85 35% 3 or not
acceptable
FGDs : what are the Service of NGO?
Credit, Institutional service, Educational Service, Information Technology, Health & sanitation etc. services
98 218 45% 3 or not
acceptable
14. Present Marketing Situation Although the study team took opinion from KIs and FGD participants on present situation on marketing of various product of demand for production status problem is acceptable and highly acceptable. Agriculture product Value of Price is very differential of all market of the area.
Table – 14.1 : Marketing Status Ranking : More than 80% = 5 highly acceptable, 50-80% = 4 or acceptable, below 50% = 3 not acceptable)
Discussion matters
Comments of Kls No of
Kls / FGD commented
Total No of Kls or FGD members
% Ranking
Kls : Do you have any problem to sale your Product & where ?
Value of Price level difference between another market, Agricultural goods, Fishery production, Vegetable marketing, Paddy marketing, Handicrafts marketing, Jute product, Bamboo product, other Crop product marketing.
64 85 75% 4 or
acceptable
FGDs : Do you have any problem to sale your Product & where ?
Value of Price level difference between another market, Agricultural goods, Fishery production, Vegetable marketing, Paddy marketing, Handicrafts marketing, Jute product, Bamboo product, Crop product marketing & Others crop.
174 218 80% 5 or highly acceptable
15. Gender and Women’s Empowerment Although the study team took opinion from KIs and FGD participants for regarding usually the major family / HHs decision are taken from Men and Women both, but maximum people opinion that, major family decision taken from Men.
Table – 15.1 : Decision Making of your Family & any situation Ranking : More than 80% = 5 highly acceptable, 50-80% = 4 or acceptable, below 50% = 3 not acceptable)
Discussion matters
Comments of Kls Impact No of
Kls / FGD commented
Total No of Kls or FGD members
% Ranking
Kls : Who and usually the major
Regarding HHs income Decision taken from
51 85 60% 4 or
acceptable Regarding HHs Expenditure
Regarding buying HHs assets
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
25
family decision are taken?
Regarding selling HHs assets Male & Female
Regarding children assets Regarding children marriage Regarding birth control Regarding Election / voting / other
FGDs : Who and usually the major family decision are taken?
Regarding HHs income
Decision taken from
Male & Female
110 218 50% 4 or
acceptable
Regarding HHs Expenditure
Regarding buying HHs assets Regarding selling HHs assets Regarding children assets Regarding children marriage Regarding birth control Regarding Election / voting / other
16. Present Migration Situation Although the study team took opinion from KIs and FGD participants of Out Migration status is very low (0.5%), Out of migration people at outside of country level various type of jobs. Because out of migration are Available job, Higher wages, big family, Debt ness, Social conflict and NGO loan of the major criteria in the area.
Table – 16.1 : Out Migration Status Ranking : More than 80% = 5 highly acceptable, 50-80% = 4 or acceptable, below 50% = 3 not acceptable)
Discussion matters
Comments of Kls No of
Kls / FGD commented
Total No of Kls or FGD members
% Ranking
Kls : What is your Out Migration Situation in area?
Out of migration People 5% in the area
43 85 50% 4 or
acceptable Available job, Higher wages, big family
Debt ness, Social conflict
FGDs : What is your Out Migration Situation in area?
Out of migration People 5% in the area
112 218 50% 4 or
acceptable Available job, Higher wages, big family
Debt ness, Social conflict
17. Future Scenario of the Project Although the study team took opinion from KIs and FGD participants Everymen are well-disposed that the proposed project will be helpful for improvement of livelihood of poor and poverty alleviation.
Table – 17.1 : Livelihood Enhancement to be created by Proposed Project Ranking : More than 80% = 5 highly acceptable, 50-80% = 4 or acceptable, below 50% = 3 not acceptable)
Discussion matters Comments of Kls or FGD
members
No of Kls / FGD
commented
Total No of Kls or FGD members
% Ranking
Kls: Do you agree that the proposed project will be helpful for improvement of livelihood of poor and poverty alleviation? (If yes then what?)
Yield of crop and fish will be increased and new employment will be generated.
72 85 85% 5 or highly acceptable
Income will be increased
Food supply will be increased
Food price will be increased
others
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
26
FGDs: Do you agree that the proposed project will be helpful for improvement of livelihood of poor and poverty alleviation? (If yes then what?)
Yield of crop and fish will be increased and new employment will be generated.
196 218 90% 5 or highly acceptable Income will be increased
Food supply will be increased
Key Findings All FGD participants including the participants from potters and fishermen community and Kls suggested the implementation of proposed project to promote livelihood enhancement activities through increased income, more food supply at reduced price and more employment. All however shows similar conditions which are: People live in cluster (village) around the elevated side of beel using the beel for crop cultivation and fishing as major livelihood activities. A paved road on eastern side of beel and other connecting road leading to beel area provide facilities to bring the beel products to home and market. Which also support the crop and fish farming? Schools, religious centers / Mosque / Temple, local government offices, market provide ample social evidence that people are involved in managing the existing resource / land, water, river, canal etc for their livelihood. It justifies that crop and fish farming is two major and potential livelihood enhancement activities. The FGD report shows that the NGOs are directly providing most micro finance service to the people of SIP. The NGOs are Grameen Bank, BRAC, Proddipan, Banchte Shekha, Palli Dardro Foundation, Kalia Daridro Foundation, Gram Bangla, Sabuj Samity, Jagoroni Chakro Foundation and ASHA. Only a few participants are provided by Government institution (BRDB, Krishi Bank, Sonali Bank etc). For livelihood enhancement credit is needed. The FGD report provides important information that NGOs are the major sources of credit and their cooperation and assistance are required for livelihood enhancement of the poor. Finally project is exceptionally necessitated in the area.
18. Objective of the Gender & Livelihood Enhancement Perspectives (GLEP) Asses the existing gender and livelihood demand identify the local resources and recommended the possible interventions to be incorporated in the SIP # SWC – 18 (Noagram - Gajaria Scheme) of the Southwest Area integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Plan (SAIWRPMP).
For attaining the project objectives earmarked as the enhanced livelihood and livelihood opportunities impacted by integrated water resources management as result of increased user participation and improved decentralized service delivery.
In order to asses the present socio-economic condition, a Participatory Rapid Rural Appraisal (PRRA) was conducted. Based on the PRRA findings, following information was analyzed and possible means for livelihood enhancement strategy were identified.
From the analysis of options for livelihood enhancement and the study team’s observations and discussion with business and other relevant people a list of feasible livelihood activities is prepared which is as follows:
19. Feasible Livelihood enhancement Activities
Sl. No
Name of the livelihood
enhancement activities
Justification / Feasibility
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
27
Sl. No
Name of the livelihood
enhancement activities
Justification / Feasibility
1. Homestead vegetable gardening, fruit tree at homestead and timber tree plantation by the roadside and embankment
Suitable for poor and marginal farmers and landless share croppers because they do not sufficient land accept homestead by at the same time interested to increase their income. The products have a guaranteed market in the area and the profit margins are high (estimated 60-70%).
2. Food processing specially rice based food processing (puffed rice, rice ball, till toffee, pressed rice etc.)
A profitable activity where women from landless poor households will be employed, their income will increase and their livelihood will be enhanced. The product has demand in local market.
3. Duck farming including mini hatchery
There is no problem of marketing duck and eggs. Profit margin is high / almost 70%. The area has good natural condition / river, canal, water body etc. for duck rearing
4. Poultry farming including mini hatchery
There is no problem of marketing Meat and eggs. Profit margin is high / almost 60%. The area has good natural condition / river, canal and green level ground area for poultry farm.
5. Cow Rearing farm There is no problem of marketing Meat and eggs. Profit margin is high / almost 50%. The area has good natural condition / river, canal and green level ground area for Cow Rearing farm.
6. Beef fattening farm There is no problem of marketing Meat and eggs. Profit margin is high / almost 50%. The area has good natural condition / river, canal and green level ground area for Beef fattening farm.
7. Home based bamboo work
This activity is getting popular in the area. Already some poor and marginal farmer families undertook this activity. Others are interested but capital and skill limits the promotion of this activity. There is already adequate market for bamboo products / basket / sieve / winnower etc. The profit margin is estimated to be 60-80% which is very reasonable.
8. Home based Jute work
The area is Jute growing area. It is available at low cost during season. Many useful items like rope, mat, bag etc. can be making with it at home using appropriate technology. The product has good market in local area and also at Narail & Jessore town.
9. Pottery There is some professional potters group. They need to support by the project. Potters product is used in rice storage and processing. The product has good market and the profit margin is 70-80%.
10. Tailoring & Handicrafts This activity is getting popular in the area. Already some poor and marginal farmer families undertook this activity. Others are interested but capital and skill limits the promotion of this activity. There is already adequate market for Handicrafts goods. The profit margin is estimated to be 50-60% which is very reasonable.
11. Packet / Box / Shopping Bag Making & Marketing
This activity is getting popular in the area. Already some poor and marginal farmer families undertook this activity. Others are interested but capital and skill limits the promotion of this activity. There is already adequate market for paper box / packet. The profit margin is estimated to be 60-80% which is very reasonable.
12. Social Forestry This activity is getting popular in the area. Already some poor and marginal farmer families undertook this activity. Others are interested but capital and skill limits the promotion of this future activity. The profit margin is estimated to be 50-60% which is very reasonable.
13. Marketing Development / Value Chain Development
This activity is not getting popular in the area. Already some group of poor and marginal farmer families undertook this activity, but this activity is unusual. Others group and WMG are interested but capital and skill limit
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
28
Sl. No
Name of the livelihood
enhancement activities
Justification / Feasibility
the promotion of this activity. But it is practical; The profit margin is estimated to be 40-50% which is very sensible.
20. Strategies for Implementation of Livelihood Enhancement Program
The findings on important issues studied through Households Survey, PRRA / Focus Group Discussion under this project provide the basis and justification to formulate strategies for implementation of program for livelihood enhancement, these are follows:
20.1 Targeting the number of Poor Beneficiaries for Project Assistance
Under the section incidence of poverty the number of poor households has been estimated 39%. All of them may not be able to participate in livelihood enhancement program due to engagement in housework, field work, pregnancy, lactation of children etc. On the other hand resource is also a constraint to address all the poor. Therefore, one fifth of the poor which is approx. Gender are targeted for project intervention. Once their capacity building is completed they undertake income generating activities and the others will adopt these through social induced method. Budget allocation per WMO in DPP was also considered to make the target for livelihood enhancement activities.
Gender Dimension of Targeting: On the basis of the findings in section incidence of poverty and causes of poverty that, “women faces difficulties of poverty more than men, they have little opportunities to work outside against wage, they are the victims of trafficking and a few women who work outside their wages are less than men”, the target number need to be split out equally for both women and men.
20.2 Transparency to be maintained in selection process to have right kind of
Beneficiaries
Livelihood program implementation needs beneficiary selection ahead. An unplanned selection will lead to chaotic situation. Transparency is too maintained to have right kind and deserving beneficiaries. This can achieved if selection is made by a well established selection board following a set of well chosen criteria.
A selection board consisting of a representative of WMG, relevant UP member, and a representative sub project is being proposed here. This should be reviewed and finalized. Based on findings that skills, credit, orientation on improved technology and undertaken IGA are required for livelihood enhancement, the following criteria are being proposed here for discussion, review and finalization:
The beneficiary must be a member of a poor family whose monthly expenditure per family member is below Tk. 742 (upper poverty line).
He or she must be within working age preferably below 50 and above 18. He or she must be permanent resident of project area. He or she must below interest to join skill, business and marketing training for livelihood
enhancement. He or she should guarantee that after the training business / IGA will be undertaken by herself
or himself He or she must join as member in the local WMG.
20.3 Ensuring Appropriate Institutional Arrangement for Implementation of GLEP Livelihood enhancement program targeting the poor involve activities at the grass root level. Identifying the poor families, selecting the poor beneficiaries, aware and motivate them to acquire skills and undertaken IGA, organizing training and orientation for them, linking them with the market,
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
29
arranging for them required financial capital etc. need local expertise and organizational and financial capacity. Government agency including BWDB may have technical expertise for implementing technical activities like design, construction, technology, demonstration etc. But they do not have capacity and expertise to handle the poor directly at the grassroots level as required for livelihood enhancement of poor people. Some XO of SMO, PMO Facilitators and NGOs are implementing similar livelihood activities at Narail & Jessore area. They have required capacities to handle the poor at the grass root level for livelihood enhancement. Livelihood enhancement program, specially identifying and selecting poor beneficiaries, creating awareness, financing, organizing and involve the poor in livelihood enhancement activities, locally are therefore proposed to be implemented by outsourcing through appropriate NGOs working in the relevant project area under the supervision of this project.
21. Gender Dimension of the Livelihood Enhancement Some of the gender issues are related to livelihood. These are the cases of divorce, violence against women, women headed households, marriage registration, birth registration and child marriage. The issues were discussed with women participants openly and some times privately on individual basis to maintain privacy. The marriage and birth registration have improved. More than 75% marriage and 80% birth were registered through Union Council. As reported by the women participants of FGD and women key informants, this contributed the decline of divorce and child marriage. Of course awareness raising by NGOs and Government program / radio / television etc. also contributed to the decline of it. Due to government incentive (food or cash incentive to poor children) primary school enrollment of girls is almost more than 80%. VGD and VGF program are currently implemented by the government. The program has contributed to enhance livelihood of poor households to very limited extent. Employing women in operation and maintenance of water structure; there is another gender dimension to enhance the livelihood of vulnerable women (FHH). Generally men are employed in operation and maintenance of the water structure and they get financial benefit. It is here suggested that along with men equal number of women must also be given opportunity for this activity.
In the construction of embankment and canal digging vulnerable women must be involved, minimum 50%, through LCS.
21.1 Recommendation After analyzing the HHs Survey data analysis, FGD study reports and other related documents comprehensive mitigation measures are suggested:
Gender and Livelihood Enhancement Awareness raising campaign among WMGs members/ community leaders / UP members / Line Agencies (DWA / DAE / DOF / DOF / concerned NGOs.
Legal Aid support for ensuring good governance, gender balanced family, women trafficking, polygamy and working environment.
Organize skills development training of the target group beneficiaries.
Facilitate linkage development activities with the resources organizations for the livelihood enhancement programs promotion/credit support/technologies of the target group beneficiaries.
Promote gender awareness programs to ensuring women’s rights and their entailment.
Ensure women involvement, especially vulnerable women in water management organization as executive committee member (as per GPWM-minimum one third) and general committee 50%.
Poor fishing community / landless member of the community will be involved in WMGs.
Vulnerable women will be form groups as LCs for canal digging, construction of embankment.
Disadvantage poor community / vulnerable women will get access in khash land / canal side tree plantation / nursery rising.
Fishing community/poor families will access for fish culture in borrow pit.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
30
Training on organizational management / leadership development / participatory planning/ resource mobilization and linkages / business development & marketing / banking transaction / poverty alleviation & management / women’s empowerment / LCS formation and poverty alleviation & management.
Gender awareness training for both male and female in target level;
Motivational and communicational skill development training for WMGs representatives
Monitoring, supervision and follow up training for WMGs representatives,
Mobilization of youth group to protect violence;
Ensure extension services to the WMGs / target beneficiaries for getting information / technology at regular basis (when require).
Legal Aid support for ensuring good governance and gender balanced family and working environment.
The GLEP will be in line with and complementary to the Gender Action Plan (GAP).
21.2 In brief GLEP will have the following special features
Increase involvement of the line agencies.
Capacity building of the beneficiaries on identified potential IGAs including business promotion and marketing linkages.
Awareness rising on gender issue legal rights, women violence etc.
Utilization of local resources & poverty & management.
Facilitation for linkage & communication skill.
Assistance for empowering women and poor people / fishing community.
22. Guideline for Selection of IGA a. WMG member with the support of NGO facilitators first identify the local level potential IGA
activities which are profitable and easily marketable in the local market. b. Market assessment involving the selected member needed for finalization of the IGA. c. The candidate member / group of members must apply to Managing Committee (MC) for having
support from the project / or other sources: other GO (DAE / DOFi / DOF (Social Forestry) / DOL / DOL (Land) / DOYD / BRDB /DWA / DSS etc) NGOs / Private sectors etc. and fill up a prescribed from prepared by WMG with the support of PMO / NGO facilitator.
22.1 Following are the possible steps for facilitating the organization of IGA for
the target Groups’ members :
a. After assessment by the committee (Representative from the Managing Committee / NGO facilitators / GFP, PMO / SMO) minimum 15 of thus selected poor members of the WMG (per village 50% members) will be selected where 50 percent at least will be vulnerable women for support by the project.
b. The identified participants will get skill training through local level organizations / NGOs / private sector first.
c. In some cases resource person in the training could be engaged from outside as per skill need for the identified IGA.
d. Participants could be sent to other concerned organizations / for be required skills e. Trained targeted poor WMG members who will be involved in the IGA, if needed, they will be
supported to link to the concerned financial institutes (Govt. banks / commercial banks / NGOs) for micro credit / SME loans [10% quota kept for women (Ref. Bangladesh Bank)]
f. Marketing linkages will be supported by the G&L PMO & NGO facilitators g. LCS will be organized by the poor beneficiaries (minimum 50% vulnerable women), supported by
WMG / PMO / SMO / ASG to carry out earthwork as “D” class contractor h. Targeted poor WMG members will be linked to the concerned authority of the Department of Land
(DOLA) /Deputy Commissioner to have Khash Land / Borrow pit (for the tree plantation beside the embankment and LGED paved & unpaved road/ nursery raising / fish culture etc) for involving poor / vulnerable women members of WMG.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
31
23. Gender & Livelihood enhancement Training Plan
The project generally progress of sustainable WMO formation and various training and others IGA programs in light of the Gender Action Plan implementation. PMO will maintain the project training to be provided following the principles of ‘’ Demand driven’’, ‘’ field based’’, and group oriented approach.
Detail Estimate Annex - 1
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
32
Sl. N
o.
Topic of Training
Participants
Number of
Participants
(Female)
Tra
inin
g
All
ow
an
ce
/ D
ay
N
o.
of
Tra
ine
e
No
. o
f D
ay
Tra
inin
g
All
ow
an
ce
(To
tal)
(axbxc)
=
d
No
. o
f S
ess
ion
H
on
ora
riu
m
Ra
te/
Se
ss
ion
No
. o
f G
rou
ps
To
tal
Ho
no
rari
um
(exfx
g)
= h
Sn
ac
ks
&
La
un
ch
To
tal
Fo
od
(bxi)
= j
Mis
ce
lla
ne
ou
s
(k)
Gra
nd
To
tal
L =
(d
+h+
j+k)
a b c d e f g h i j k l (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.)
1.
Homestead vegetable gardening, fruit tree at homestead and timber tree plantation by the roadside and embankment
WMG Member
60 (30) 350 60 2 42000 8 600 3 14400 200 12000 10000 78400
2.
Rice based food processing / puffed rice, rice ball, rice cake etc
WMG Member
60 (30) 350 60 2 42000 8 600 3 14400 200 12000 10000 78400
3.
Duck / Koile bird farming along with mini hatchery
WMG Member
60 (30) 350 60 2 42000 8 600 3 14400 200 12000 10000 78400
4.
Home based bamboo work / storage and processing basket, and marketing
WMG Member
60 (30) 350 60 2 42000 8 600 3 14400 200 12000 10000 78400
5. Home based jute works
WMG Member
60 (30) 350 60 2 42000 8 600 3 14400 200 12000 10000 78400
6.
Pottery / improved design for rice storage and processing pot etc
WMG Member
60 (30) 350 60 2 42000 8 600 3 14400 200 12000 10000 78400
7.
Gender Awareness / Capacity Building
WMG Member
60 (30) 350 60 2 42000 8 600 3 14400 200 12000 10000 78400
8. Tailoring / Handicrafts / Embroidery
WMG Member
60 (30) 350 60 2 42000 8 600 3 14400 200 12000 10000 78400
9. Packet / Box / Shopping Bag
WMG Member
60 (30) 350 60 2 42000 8 600 3 14400 200 12000 10000 78400
10. Cow Rearing / Beef fattening
WMG Member
60 (30) 350 60 2 42000 8 600 3 14400 200 12000 10000 78400
11. Mashrum Cultivation & Marketing
WMG Member
60 (30) 350 60 2 42000 8 600 3 14400 200 12000 10000 78400
12. Motivational Tour
WMG Member
200 (100)
350 200 2 140000 8 600 3 14400 200 40000 30000 254400
Training costing for 2 WMG 1116800
Tentative 10 WMG for SWC – 18, (5 x 1116800) 5584000
Total cost for Gender & Livelihood Enhancement Plan; SWC – 18 ; 5584000
Program implementation cost (Follow-up on post training activities, linkage with resources, marketing promotional activities, demonstration / piloting in sample basis (initial capital for destitute women only) etc.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
33
24. Monitoring & Evaluation Monitoring and evaluation will be carried out side by side: GFP / PMO / SMO / ASG / project personnel / MC of WMG & WMA will form a monitoring committee and will provide a quarterly report to the PMO / Project authority, copy to Gender and Poverty Component (GPC). The ADB Mission recalled the MTR agreement to retain RAs as experts to provide training to the concerned WMGs as well as monitoring and evaluation after SIP preparation. ISPMCs will explore the possibility of engaging an NGO or group of experts to provide facilitation, training and advisory support to value chain development. PMO will maintain the project training to be provided following the principles of ‘’ Demand driven’’, ‘’ field based’’, and group oriented approach.
25. Goals / G&L Enhanced Policy of SAIWRPMP The major goals of are as follows:
To establish participation of water resources operation and maintenance for women capacity
building.
To minimum 70% poor / non poor women are always contribution of any water related program.
To minimum 50% poor / non poor women are targeted of any other IGA participation.
To minimum 50% poor / non poor women are targeted of various IGA / Skill / WMG / leader ship empowering / capacity building / Agri based / Fish farm / O&M of water structures training.
To minimum 50% poor / non poor women are always contribution of WMG program.
To establish equality between men and women in all spheres of livelihood.
To ensure women’s security in all sphere of state, society and family.
To ensure empowerment of women in the fields of politics, administration and the economy.
To financial / credit facility as per WMG activity for IGA.
To the 100% poverty / impoverished reduced for women participation require is always of any water resource program.
To establish Women’s human rights.
To develop women as educated and efficient human resources.
To free women from the curse of poverty.
To eliminate existing discrimination against men and women.
To acknowledge women’s contribution in social and economic sphere.
To eradicate all forms of oppression on women and girls.
To establish equality between men and women in administration, politics, education, culture, sports and all other economic activities.
To devise and import technology congenial to the interest of women and ban use of technology harmful to women.
To take adequate measures to ensure women’s health and nutrition.
To ensure priority of women in the arrangement of hoisting and providing suitable shelter for women.
To meet the needs of women especially in difficult circumstances.
To ensure security for widows, divorced, unmarried and childless women.
To reflect gender perspective in mass-media by projection positive image of women.
To provide assistance on flourishing creativity of meritorious and talented women.
To provide support services in the advancement of women.
26. Conclusion
Many thanks for the cooperation of the PMO & SMO official’s staff of the BWDB, ISPM Consultants of BWDB such as Research Assistant, Senior Facilitator, Community Facilitator, XO of SMO, NGO Facilitator, and Project Beneficiaries local members in collecting data, checking the filled-in questionnaires, data entry, data cleaning, and editing the entered data in the computer database. Without their help it would have not been possible to complete the Baseline House holds survey Report.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB. Annex - D
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria
34
We also convey our thanks to all our colleagues of Socio-economy Division and Research Cell of Gender & Livelihood, BWDB for their tireless efforts at all stages of conducting the survey and to all who contributed in producing and improving the report. Whatever is found useful in this report is all due to these inputs from various colleagues. However, the production of this report itself has been a valuable experience for the Report Writing Team. This report is a one-hundred percent BWDB product and that is very much in line with the objectives of Gender & Livelihood enhancement plan of SAIWRPMP: women empowering, capacity building and poverty reduced integrated institutional strengthening competence upsurge.
One of the important issues of the project objective is to enhanced livelihood through created IGA opportunities in collaboration with Government and Non-Government organizations. The feature of the gender & livelihood of SIP # SWC – 18 (Noagram-Gajaria Scheme) already mentioned in this report which are come across by the study. May wish the project will take initiative for better livelihood situation to alleviate of poverty reduction.
Finally, we are thankful to the All.
ANNEX – E
WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATIONS
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-E
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 1
WMO Plan for SIP # SWC- 17+18 Chenchuri Beel Sub- Project
Summary FCD/I Projects may either enhance the community integration or it may make the people
quarrel. This became ironically true for most of FCD/I projects of the erstwhile WAPDA installed
in the early sixties. Planners during the time nursed the theory that as soon as water is made
available to farmers, farmers will utilize irrigation water and food production will be doubled. But
in reality, farmers felt reluctant to use irrigation water in different parts of the country. Although
irrigation canals were completed in record period with an excellent level of engineering skills, an
integrated approach with farmers participation was totally missing. So in many areas farmers
strongly oppose the FCD/ I systems.
Participatory management has received a lot of attention in recent years as a result of
commercialization and privatization of Government agencies in many parts of the world. It is
recognized that participation of the farmers plays an important role in increasing agriculture
production and performance improvement of FCD/I systems. One of the ways of
institutionalizing participatory Water Management in public sector FCD/I system is to establish a
formal mechanism for interaction between beneficiaries and agency personnel. From the survey
it reveals that 8 local NGOs are working in the SIP area. About 90% of them are involved in
credit & the rests are working with health, education etc. But none is involved is water
management sectors. For SIP # 18 proposed 10 WMG and one WMA will enable beneficiaries
to discuss, negotiate and participate in decision making with the agency on various issues of
water managements.
Introduction
The Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning & Management Project
(SAIWRPMP), with the assistance of Asho Samaj Gori (ASG) an NGO contracted by the
project, will utilize a clear, step-by- step and participatory process in the formation,
strengthening and mobilization of WMOs. ASG through its cadre of facilitators will be primarily
responsible for developing the capacity of WMOs to manage their water-related resources on
their own.
This process of WMO Development is guided by the provisions of the Guidelines for
Participatory Water Management (GPWM) and will be adopted in the formation of WMOs in the
Narail and Chenchuri Beel sub-projects then reviewed, adjusted and fine tuned based on the
actual field experiences from these 2 sub-projects to make it more responsive to the needs and
requirements of the other sub-projects under SAIWRPMP. As proposed in the inception report,
the process of WMO development has 6 phases as illustrated below:
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-E
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 2
Phases Involved in WMO Development
Phase Description of Each Phase Time frame
1 Rapport and knowledge building phase Months 1 & 2
2 Problem analysis and service identification phase Months 3 – 9
3 Organization building phase Months 3 – 9
4 Capacity building phase Months 10 -12
5 SIP Implementation 1 Year
6 Management transfer phase After completion of rehabilitation works
Location SIP # 17+18 of Chenchuri Beel sub-project is located in 2 Unions (Purulia and Peruli) of Kalia Upazila under Narail District. 13 villages from these two Unions are associated (fully or partly) within this SIP # 17+18 (Table-1 , 2 & Fig-1). SIP # 17+18 is popularly known as Liner khal (canal) area and bounded by the river Chitra to the west and Nabaganga to the south & east and ridges of other SIPs northwards & westwards.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-E
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 3
Table – 1: Villages of SIP # SWC-17+18 on GPS Study
Sl. No. Name of Village GPS Remarks
1 Diadanga N-2300121.9
E-8903535.6 Small Village
2 Noagram N-2300150.8
E-8903539.3 Big Village
3 Bajababra N-2300241.0
E-8903554.7 Small Village
4 Kalamonkhali N-2300258.5
E-8903543.3 Small Village
5 Amtola N-2300302.0
E-8903520.1 Small Village
6 Fuldhaho N-2300321.0
E-8903447.1 Small Village
7 Dariaghata N-2300337.8
E-8903439.5 Small Village
8 Burikhili N-2205941.7
E-8903350.1 Small Village
9 Per-Vhombag N-2300011.8
E-8903419.3 Small Village
10 Perbeshnopur N-2300046.4
E-8903439.1 Medium Village
11 Pateswari N-2300108.8
E-8903347.0 Medium Village
12 Satbaria N-2300037.3
E-8903358.7 Medium Village
13 Perulistan N-2205945.9
E-8903329.9 Medium Village
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-E
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 4
Table- 2: Planned Formulation and Activities for Organizing WMOs in SIP # SWC – 17+18
Sl No
Name of WMG
(with cl. villages)
Date of WMG
Formation
Regd No/ Date
Area (Ha)
Planned Members (1 from each HHs)
Potential # of Members
(70%)
Members enrolled
Date of monthly meeting
Date of Members enrollment
meeting
Date of Executive committee meeting
Capital formation general meeting
Capital formation (Tk)
Bank A/c Responsi
bility
Last month Total
(Female)
This month
This month Total
(Female) Last month
This month
Total
1
Chameli WMG S-18/1 Dariaghata Fuldah
-- -- 188 384 270 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Afroza
2 Beli WMG S-18/2 Amtola 5.5.10
8/Klaia 24.2.11
158 282 197 144 (42)
-- 144 (42)
25 of Every month
-- 6/611 8/6/11 43580 1000 44580 SB/
6313 Afroza
3
Keya WMG S-18/3 Kalamonkhali Bajebabra
3.5.10 4/Kakia/ 24.01.11
174 368 258 175 (62)
-- 175 (62)
28 of Every month
-- 10/6/11 10/6/1
1 45590 2960 48550
SB/ 6312
Afroza
4 Nabaganga WMG S-18/4 Noagram 18.5.10
3/Kakia/ 24.01.11
195 538 377 205 (64)
7 (4)
212 (68)
30 of Every month
-- 11/6/11 11/6/1
1 50420 1980 52400
SB/ 6323
Suvankar
5 Ekata WMG S-18/5 Diadanga
1.5.10 7/ kalia/ 1.02.11
64 238 167 134 (31)
-- 134 (31)
23 of Every month
17/6/11 -- 17/6/1
1 35320 1500 36820
SB/ 6303
Shyamol
6 Suravi WMG S-18/5A Perbishnupur
14.5.10 12/Kalia 3/3/11
107 550 385 422 (71)
-- 422 (71)
25 of Every month
-- 8/6/11 8/6/11 47700 -- 47700 SB/
6318 Mamun
7 Hasnahena WMG S-18/6 Burikhali 22.5.10
14/Kalia 28/3/11
100 149 104 114 (33
-- 114 (33)
28 of Every month
-- 9/6/11 9/6/11 30000 -- 30000 SB/ Pe 5318
Mamun
8 Rajanigandha WMG S-18/6A Pervumbag
27.5.10 -- 83 127 89 52 (7)
-- 52 (7)
17 of Every month
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Shaymol
9 Kanakchapa WMG S-18/7 perulistan
23.5.10 1/Kalia 10.1.11
155 185 130 147 (45)
-- 147 (45)
29 of Every month
-- 10/6/11 10/6/1
1 36370 510 36880
SB/ 5274
Tukarem
10
Gandharaj WMG S-18/8 Satbaria Pateswari
1.5.10 2/Kalia 10.1.11
247 358 251 257 (105)
2 (2)
259 (107)
30 of Every month
-- 9/6/11 9/6/11 67260 -- 67260 SB/
5252
Tukarem
10 9 8 1471 3179 2228 1650 (442)
3 (0)
1659 (442)
356240
7950 36419
0
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-E
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 5
Fig- 1
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-E
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 6
Levels of Water Management Organization in the SIP # 17+18 1. Water Management Group (WMG) The Southwest project intends to establish Water Management Organizations (WMOs) that will in future be able to take care of O&M of the water infrastructure in their area. The areas are defined on hydrological basis, called subunits of the subproject area. Further subdivision is based on “sub-schemes” basis within the sub-units, that are defined as the command area (CA) of the main regulator discharging to the river. The GPWM distinguishes three tiers of WMO for projects of 5000 hectares or more:
Water Management Group (WMG) at the lowest level for each smallest hydrological unit or Social Unit (Para or Village).
Water Management Association (WMA) at the mid level for each project or system.
Water Management Federation (WMF) at the apex level of the project/scheme.
Principles followed to form WMG and to identify potential WMG members within DBA: In SWAIWRPMP, following this 3- tires model the principle followed is that a hydrologically delineated DBA based WMG shall be formed within each SIP area. SIP # 18 covers 4 regulators (1 is proposed), 6 WM structures, 13 Villages in 2 Unions. 13 Villages are clustered into 10 groups for organizing 10 WMGs. In clustering the villages following factors are considered:
a) Future O & M of water infrastructure in their area b) Social complexity c) Maintaining minimum distance to facilitate WMG members to attend meeting place. d) Maintaining (as per as possible) administrative boundaries (Village or Union
boundaries) for each WMG. e) Common and acceptable nomenclatures of each WMG. f) Overall, technically feasible & socially acceptable Section of the water infrastructure
are the basis of WMG formation. Nomenclatures of each WMG is proposed on popular artistic names of Flowers in consultation with stakeholders (Table- 2).To identify potential WMG members mouza maps are used. Mouza maps of the Directorate of Lands are overlaid in DBA map developed by the SW project to identify the related villages (fully or partly). The villages are then screened to identify plot numbers. Superimposed DBA thus obtained are then further verified through ‘Google Earth’. Next task is to identify the names of plot owners. Normally Upazila Sub- Register’s office (Land Registry office) is the source where names of actual land owners are available. This ownership record are in huge quantity which contains both minor and adults. But for WMG formation only adult land owners (above 18 years) of small area is needed. To prepare a reliable & actual land ownership list for each WMG, one or two senior resource persons were picked- up as volunteers from the local Community to supply the names of plot owners in one sitting organized in any meeting place near the DBA. This list is more accurate & accepted by the stakeholders. The WMG is the grass root and core WM organization for O & M of which all (>70%) of the people of the DBA in the community (farmers, fishermen, aqua-culturists, small traders, boatmen, craftsmen, landless people, destitute women, PAPs etc) shall become member
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-E
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 7
The process of organizing the local stakeholders into WMOs is implemented by an NGO (ASG) under guidance of the ISPM-consultants and supervised by the Project Director (PMO). General members of the WMG will elect representatives for WMG and WMA. They will hold two elections; 1st Election for the Executive Committee of the WMG consisting 12, (at least 30% women) that will decide on how to spend the budget for O&M which needs approval from the general members. The second election is to elect 5 representatives (male1, female-1, landless-1, fisherman-1, destitute woman-1) of the WMG to the WMA as in Annex-1. A member of WMG Executive Committee can not be a general member of the WMA, meaning they will not be allowed to compete for two posts simultaneously in two tiers (one in the WMG Executive Committee and the other in the WMA neither member or EC). This is different from the public administration and the Co-operative Societies where dual posts can be held. 2. Water Management Association (WMA): One (1) WMA will be formed to manage the water management activities in SIP # 18. Representatives of General Members of each WMG will become General Members of WMA who in turn will form WMA Executive Committee consisting 12 members through election.
Key Activities involved in developing WMO in SIP # 18 The following summarizes the key steps those are being undertaken by the ASG NGO facilitators in the process of organizing the Water Management Association in SIP # 18. 1. Prepare list of beneficiaries: The NGO Asho Samaj Gori (ASG) has been contracted for social mobilization works during September, 2008. They have fielded 14 Facilitators and 1 NGO Supervisor. Facilitators are now in the stage of WMO formation with their entry in the local community. The aim is to establish rapport with the Community by conducting house to house visits to meet potential beneficiaries’ families and participating in the Community activities. Before fielding, the Facilitators were imparted 2-days training (1 day class room and 1 day field test) on the preparation of beneficiaries list. Their performances were tested before they are actually fielded on the 10th of September’ 2008. The ASG completed their initial report for WMO formation during November 2008. After fine tuning of the DBA, number of villages have been increased. Further beneficiaries survey was made during 1-5 March 2009 through the NGO Facilitators, 2. Organizing the WMO: At the initial stage of WMO formation, series of discussion meetings were held and is continuing with local stakeholders, UP Chairman, LGI members before and after Union Level Orientation workshop (12.06.08) at Purulia Union Parishad. After synthessing the stakeholders recommendations, SIP was cleared in the DLIAPEC meeting on 18.02.09. SMO Narail confirms the implementability of works. Process for formation of WMO is in progress. 3. Formation of Water Management Group (WMG) and Water Management Association (WMA):
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-E
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 8
3 water management groups (WMG) and 1 Water Management Association will be formed in SIP # 17+18. (Table-2 and Annex-1). 4. Registration of the WMO with the Department of Cooperatives: The WMG, through its elected executive committee, registers with the DoC after completing all the required documentations and complying with all the requirements for registration. WMA the mid tier will supervise & monitor WMG and will participate O & M activities under management agreements. Afterwards attempts will be made for registering WMA. 5. WMO Proceeds with its O & M Activities: The WMO makes plan/program of activities so that it is able to actively participate in the
discussion, finalization and implementation of the SIP and in undertaking its O & M activities.
(The process of WMO formation is illustrated in the flowchart (Annex-2) 6. Training program for WMO members in SIP # 18 Training of WMG/WMA Executive Committee members on organizational management. This training intervention is designed to enhance the existing basic leadership skills of WMA leaders. It is geared towards the provision of adequate knowledge and leadership skills to enable the WMA leaders to improve their performance as they carry out their O & M tasks. This training provides learning opportunities to WMA leaders for more effective and efficient job performance. The curriculum includes a discussion of the WMA’s operations and its composition, the roles and functions of the WMA leaders, sessions which explore the WMA leaders’ skills in communication and problem solving as well as management of WMA records. This training also introduces the WMG/WMA leaders to the concept of saving and the operation and maintenance of water management infrastructures. This organizational management training (Training Plan) will be given to each WMG and WMA executive committee members. Each training will last for 3 days and will be facilitated by the NGO facilitator assigned in SIP # 18. Bar chart of WMO development activities in SIP # 18 (Annex-3) 7. Monitoring Indicators for WMO development in SIP # 18 The progress of the WMO development activities in SIP # 18 needs to be regularly monitored and evaluated to assess the viability status of the WMO during the various phases of WMO development. This will determine the key areas where the WMO needs to be strengthened and to guide the NGO facilitators in redirecting organizing efforts geared towards developing the capability of the WMO to manage its water resources efficiently and effectively. The monitoring indicators listed below focus on the capacity of the various committees to carry out committee work effectively; the organizational and leadership skills of the WMO officers and leaders; and, the functionality of the WMO as a whole. Evaluation of the WMO in SIP # 18 based on the monitoring indicators below will be conducted jointly by the Executive Engineer/Narail SMO, JMC subcommittee and representatives from the SIP # 18 WMOs. Organizational Phase
1) Leaders/officers demonstrate organizational leadership skills in: a) preparing and organizing meetings properly b) presiding meetings in an orderly manner c) keeping records of minutes of meetings
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-E
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 9
d) maintaining financial books and other financial reports
2) Leaders/officers demonstrate good problem solving capability in: a) identifying and analyzing the problems affecting them; b) setting priorities, general objectives and plan action strategies, c) implementing action/strategies and monitoring and evaluating outcome of
implementation.
3) Committee level. The ad hoc committees carry out committee work effectively when:
a) members participate actively in committee activities and meetings; b) the committee regularly conducts meetings to assess accomplishments vs.
targets; c) the committee regularly reports to the officers and members; d) planned activities are implemented at a given time;
4) WMO level. The WMO is able to assess existing organizational structure to suit
the changing needs. The members also actively participate in the affairs of the WMO.
a) The WMO is legally registered; b) 70% of the potential beneficiaries( 30% women) are registered members of the
WMO; c) The necessary positions to be created determined by the leaders and members.
Functions of the positions to be created are well defined by the officers and members; d) Qualifications criteria for the positions to be created are set by the officers and
members; e) Mechanics for filling up the position set up by the officers and members; f) The proposed organizational set up discussed with the members before
finalization; g) Members regularly attend WMO meetings; h) Members actively participate by voicing out their ideas, opinions, suggestions and
concerns regarding conflicts, problems, issues, activities , accomplishments and plans of the WMO;
i) The members carry out their duties and responsibilities expected of them by the WMO e.g. involvement in committee work, payment of dues, etc.
Operation and Maintenance Phase
5) Leaders/officers demonstrate organizational leadership skills in: a) preparing and organizing meetings properly b) presiding meetings in an orderly manner c) keeping records of minutes of meetings d) maintaining financial books and other financial reports 6) Leaders/officers demonstrate good problem solving capability in: a) identifying and analyzing the problems affecting them; b) setting priorities, general objectives and plan action strategies, c) implementing action/strategies and monitoring and evaluating outcome of
implementation.
7) Committee level. The committees carry out committee work effectively when: a) members participate actively in committee activities and meetings; b) the committee regularly conducts meetings to assess accomplishments vs.
targets;
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-E
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 10
c) the committee regularly reports to the officers and members; d) planned activities are implemented at a given time; 8) WMO level: a) regular executive committee meetings held to assess status of operation and
maintenance b) in the WMO and issues and problems encountered in the implementation of O &
M policies; c) executive committee members attend committee meetings d) regular general assembly meetings are held to assess status of WMO operation
and maintenance and issues/problems encountered in the implementation of O & M policies e) members attend general assembly meetings; f) regular maintenance work is undertaken; g) members actively participate in regular maintenance work; h) fees and dues required are collected; i) A financial report is regularly presented to the general assembly; j) Issues/ conflicts are resolved by the WMO in a timely fashion; k) WMO is up-to-date in keeping its records and documents e.g. financial records, membership books, minutes of meetings, etc.; l) standing committee members actively participate in the committee activities; m) executive committee members of the WMO actively perform their duties and responsibilities; n) O & M personnel actively perform their duties and responsibilities.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-E
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 11
Annex-1
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-E
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 12
Annex-2
WMO FORMATION AT A GLANCE
SMO confirms Implementability of SIP
Approval of Internal Rules & Regulations by the General
Members of WMG
Elected representatives of WMG form WMA E.C
Registration of WMO with DoC
SIP clearance by Union
SIP Approved in DLIAPEC
Prepare list of Beneficiary from DB Areas
Stakeholders form WMO Foundation Committee
Drafting Internal Rules & Regulations of the WMG
Hold 2 Elections: WMG E.C. & WMA Representatives
WMA
General Members of the WMG
WMO proceeds with its O&M activities
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-E
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 13
WMO Development Main Activities in SIP # SWC – 17+18
Annex-3
Sl. No
Activities 2009 - 2010 2010 - 2011 2011 - 2012 2012 - 2013
1. SIP clearance by Union
2. SIP approved in DLIAPEC
3. SMO Confirms implement ability of SIP
4. Prepare list of beneficiaries
5. Formation of WMO Foundation Committee
6. WMO Foundation Committee submit project request to SMO
7. Formation of WMG
Creation of Committee to develop draft internal Rules
Drafting bye – laws
Election of Executive Committee
8. Formation of WMA
Creation of Committee to develop draft internal Rules
Drafting bye – laws
Election of Executive Committee
9. Registration by DoC
10. Training on Organizational Management
WMG Executive Committee
WMA Executive Committee
Capacity Development
11. SIP IA Signing by WMA & BWDB
12. Regular Organizational Strengthening
13. Awareness building and Motivational Campaign
14. WMG members registration
15. Collection of Savings, Shares, Admission fees etc.
16. Monitoring
17. WMA Proceeds O & M
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-E
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 14
SIP wise WMO Training Plan Annex - 4
Detailed Costing of Training 1st Phase
Sl.
No.
Topic of Training
Participants
Number of
Participants
(Female) Tra
inin
g
All
ow
an
ce/
Day
(A)
No
. o
f T
rain
ee
(B)
No
. o
f D
ay
(C)
Tra
inin
g
All
ow
an
ce (
To
tal)
(AX
BX
C)
= D
N
o.
of
Ses
sio
n
(E)
Ho
no
rari
um
Ra
te/
Ses
sio
n
(F)
No
. o
f G
rou
ps
(G)
To
tal
Ho
no
rari
um
(EX
FX
G)
= H
Tra
nsp
ort
Su
pp
ort
(I)
To
tal
Tra
nsp
ort
(BX
I) =
J
V
enu
e C
ha
rge
(K)
Gra
nd
To
tal
= (
D+
H+
J+
K)
(Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.)
1. Concepts of IWM
& objects of WMO
WMG
Members
60 (20) 200 60 2 24000 8 400 3 9600 100 6000 1500 41100
2. GPWM & Formation
of WMG / Tasks &
Responsibility
WMG
Members
60 (20) 200 60 2 24000 8 400 3 9600 100 6000 1500 41100
3. Preparation List of
Beneficiaries WMG
Members
60 (20) 200 60 2 24000 8 400 3 9600 100 6000 1500 41100
4. Procedures of WMG
By-law drafting WMG
Members
30 (10) 200 30 2 12000 8 400 1 3200 100 3000 1500 19700
5. Election Procedures
of WMO WMG
Members
60 (20) 200 60 2 24000 8 400 3 9600 100 6000 1500 41100
6. Registration
Procedures of WMO WMG
Members
60 (20) 200 60 2 24000 8 400 3 9600 100 6000 1500 41100
7. Book Keeping
WMG
Members
30 (10) 200 30 2 12000 8 400 1 3200 100 3000 1500 19700
8. Meetings &
Maintaining meeting
proceedings
WMG
Members
30 (10) 200 30 2 12000 8 400 1 3200 100 3000 1500 19700
9. Motivational Tour
WMG
Members
50 (15) 5 Members from each WMG X 10 WMG = 50 LS 50000
FY 2009- 10
Total
314600
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-E
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 15
SIP wise WMO Training Plan
Detailed Costing of Training 2nd Phase
Sl.
No.
Topic of Training
Participants
Number of
Participants
(Female)
Tra
inin
g
All
ow
an
ce/
Day
(A)
No
. o
f T
rain
ee
(B)
No
. o
f D
ay
(C)
Tra
inin
g
All
ow
an
ce
(To
tal)
(AX
BX
C)
= D
No
. o
f S
essi
on
(E)
Ho
no
rari
um
Ra
te/
Ses
sio
n
(F)
No
. o
f G
rou
ps
(G)
To
tal
Ho
no
rari
um
(EX
FX
G)
= H
Tra
nsp
ort
Su
pp
ort
(I)
To
tal
Tra
nsp
ort
(BX
I) =
J
V
enu
e C
ha
rge
(K)
Gra
nd
To
tal
= (
D+
H+
J+
K)
(Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.)
1. Formation of
WMA & Task
&
Responsibilities
WMG
Members
60 (20) 200 60 2 24000 8 400 3 9600 100 6000 150
0 41100
2. WMA By-law
drafting WMG
Members
30 (10) 200 30 2 12000 8 400 1 3200 100 3000 150
0 19700
3. Management
transfer
WMG
Members
60 (20) 200 60 2 24000 8 400 3 9600 100 6000 150
0 41100
4. Conflict
Management
WMG
Members
60 (20) 200 60 2 24000 8 400 3 9600 100 6000 150
0 41100
5. Formation JMC
its composition
tasks &
responsibilities
WMG
Members
60 (20) 200 60 2 24000 8 400 3 9600 100 6000 150
0 41100
6. Operation &
Maintenance
WMG
Members
60 (20) 200 60 2 24000 8 400 3 9600 100 6000 150
0 41100
7. Motivational
Tour WMG
Members
50 (15) 5 Members from each WMG X 10 WMG = 50 LS 50000
FY 2010- 11
Total
275200
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-E
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 16
SIP wise WMO Training Plan
Detailed Costing of Training 3rd Phase
Sl.
No.
Topic of Training
Participants
Number of
Participants
(Female) Tra
inin
g
All
ow
an
ce/
Day
(A)
No
. o
f T
rain
ee
(B)
No
. o
f D
ay
(C)
Tra
inin
g
All
ow
an
ce (
To
tal)
(AX
BX
C)
= D
N
o.
of
Ses
sio
n
(E)
Ho
no
rari
um
Ra
te/
Ses
sio
n
(F)
No
. o
f G
rou
ps
(G)
To
tal
Ho
no
rari
um
(EX
FX
G)
= H
Tra
nsp
ort
Su
pp
ort
(I)
To
tal
Tra
nsp
ort
(BX
I) =
J
V
enu
e C
ha
rge
(K)
Gra
nd
To
tal
= (
D+
H+
J+
K)
(Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.)
1. O & M
WMG Members 60 (20) 200 60 2 24000 8 400 3 9600 100 6000 1500 41100
2. Capacity Building
WMG Members 60 (20) 200 60 2 24000 8 400 3 9600 100 6000 1500 41100
3. Monitoring &
Evaluation
WMG Members 60 (20) 200 60 2 24000 8 400 3 9600 100 6000 1500 41100
4. Audit &
Inspection
WMG Members 30 (10) 200 30 2 12000 8 400 1 3200 100 3000 1500 19700
5. Motivational
Tour
WMG Members
50 (15) 5 Members from each WMG X 10 WMG = 50 LS 50000
FY 2011- 12
Total
193000
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-E
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 17
ANNEX – F
O & M PLAN
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-F Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 1
Noagram-Gajaria Scheme (SWC-17 + 18)
O & M Plan
1. Introduction
The Chenchuri Beel is a Sub-Project under South West Area Integrated Water Resources
Management Project (SWAIWRMP).This sub project area is bounded by the Chitra river in the east
and Naboganga river in the southeast & north.The rivers are tidally influenced. On the basis of the
Hydrological boundary the sub project was divided into 18 SWCs units during the feasibility study
(PPTA). After detail hydrological studies the SIP boundary of SWC 17-18 has been finalized as one
unit after combining both 17 & 18. The total gross area under SIP 17-18 is about 1471 ha of which
1030 ha is benefitted area..The SIP area is located in two unions namely Perulia and Purulia under
Kalia Upazila of Narail District. There are 13 ( seaven) villages partly or fully within the SIP area. The
area has been sub-divided into sub-catchments considering formation of WMOs. There are as many
as 10 ( ten) number of WMGs formed within the SIP The topography of the SIP area varies from 3.50
m PWD in the north to 1,5 m PWD at the south .The rivers are tidally influenced.
2. Methodology :
The SIP area has been delineated and the WMG have also been formed. At the very outset
discussion meetings were held for awareness development about the concept & activities of the
project with the Chairman,Ward Members & the beneficiaries of the area. In view of the suggestions
made in the awareness building meetings walkthrough were held for physical verification of the need
placed by the participants in all the tentative WMG areas. After taking into account of the beneficiaries
demand the total no of infrastructure within the SIP SWC 17-18 are as follows:
i) Pateswari Regulator: 10-Vents (1.82m x 1.52m )
ii) Takimara Regulator: 2-Vents (1.82m x 1.52m )
iii) Takimara Regulator ( proposed) : 1-Vent (1.82m x 1.52m )
iv) Satbaria Regulator (proposed) : 1-Vent (1.82m x 1.52m )
v) Noagram Regulator : 1-Vent (1.82m x 1.52m )
vi) Diadanga Bishnapur Regulator : 1-Vent (1.82m x 1.52m )
vii) Dakhin Burikhali Regulator : 1-Vent (1.82m x 1.52m )
viii) Bridge/Culverts (proposed) : 2 nos
ix) WMG Office Building (Proposed) : 2 nos
x) Tube Well (Proposed) : 10 nos
xi) Re-excavation of Liner Khal: 8/2 = 4.00 km
xii) Re-excavation of Chachuri Khal : 3.25 km.
xiii) Re-excavation of Maridanga Khal : 2.00 km
xiv) Re-excavation of Noagram Khal :1.6 km
xv) Re-excavation of Suorer Khal: 1.80 km
xvi) Re-excavation of Majhalir Khal: 3.40 km
xvii) Re-excavation of Mora Khal: 2.80 km
xviii) Re-excavation of Amtola Khal: 1.25 km
xix) Re-excavation of Kumarer Khal: 1.80 km
xx) Re-excavation of Takimara Khal: 1.50 km
xxi) Re-excavation of Satbaria/Gajaria Khal: 1.50 km
xxii) Re-excavation of Diadanga-Bishnapur Khal: 1.75 km
xxiii) Embankment from Urushi to Pateswari: 12.00 km.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-F Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 2
3. Data Collection:
A draft O & M Plan for this SIP SWC 17-18 has been prepared on the basis of data received from the
research assistants. There were senior facilitators, community facilitators in the field to collect data for
this SIP and these data were sent to the research assistants working under the PMO. After analyzing
by the research assistants the data were submitted to the O & M specialist for this Project. The O & M
specialist after getting the infrastructure data of the SIP have examined and incorporated in the O & M
Plan for the SIP. During discussion with the beneficiaries it was found that the beneficiaries have
suggested for all types of earthwork within the SIP are to be executed through the WMG members.
The beneficiaries also opined that they are ready to share the O & M cost for the SIP.
4. Annual Maintenance Cost:
Summary of Annual Maintenance Cost of Infrastructure under CSP 17-18 (Sub-Unit Action Plan) is
given in Table: 1.
Table: 1 (Tk. in Lac)
Item of Works Type of Maintenance Cost Total Cost
Reference
Preventive Periodic
Drainage
Channel/Khal
0.133 4.105 4.138 Table :4
Structures 0.431 4.924 5.355 Table :5
Embankment 1.680 6.144 7.824 Table :6
Total 2.244 15.173 17.417
5. Cost Sharing between WMG & BWDB
The total O & M cost for this SIP,SWC 17-18 comes to Tk 17,41,700.00 per year. For sustainable
operation & maintenance of the scheme, all peripheral infrastructure & the khals connecting to the
peripheral structures and infrastructure within the SIP having command area more than 1000 ha are
considered as public goods. The periodic maintenance of the public goods will be borne by BWDB
under the JMC. The preventive maintenance of the public goods plus the preventive & periodic
maintenance of other infrastructure within the SIP are to be borne by WMGs. It is to be noted here
that the structures ( serial i to serial v) in the infrastructure list under methodology Section 2 serves
SIP SWC 16, (17-18) & (4+6+8+9+14 ) for which the maintenance cost of these structures ( sl i to sl v
) are distributed on the basis of their respective benefitted areas.The share for this SIP comes to
11%.. Here for this SIP, the shared structures and Diadanga Bishnapur, Daskhin Burikhali regulators
2 nos Bridge/Culverts, 1no Inlet/Outlet, Liner , Noagram , Takimara, Satbaria/Gajaria khals and 12.00
km of embankment are considered as public goods. The operation & maintenance cost sharing for
SWC 16 is given below in Table2
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-F Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 3
a) Khals/Canals Table : 2/1
Sl.No Name of Khal Length (Km) Cost Sharing
1 Liner Khal ( 1/2 of 8 km) 4 Pre:WMA Per; WDB
2 Chenchuri Khal 3.25 Pre & Per WMA
3 Maridanga 2 Pre & Per WMA
4 Noagram 1.6 Pre:WMA Per; WDB
5 Suorer 1.8 Pre & Per WMA
6 Majhair 3.4 Pre & Per WMA
7 Mora 2.8 Pre & Per WMA
8 Amtola 1.25 Pre & Per WMA
9 Kumarer 1.8 Pre & Per WMA
10 Takimara 1.5 Pre:WMA Per; WDB
11 Satbaria/Gajaria 1.5 Pre:WMA Per; WDB
12 Diadanga Bishnapur 1.75 Pre & Per WMA
Total 26.65
b) Structures Table : 2/2
Sl. No Name of
Structures Vent Size No. Vents
Cost Sharing
1 Pateswari Reg 1.52m X 1.8 2 m 10
As the structures Sl.1 to Sl.5 will
serve the SIPs SWC 16,17-
18,7-14.the O & M cost will
also shared among the SIPs.As
these are peripheral structures
,preventive by WMA/WMG &
periodic by BWDB
2 Takimara Reg 1.52 m X 1.82m 2
3 Takimara Reg
(Proposed) 1.52 m X 1.82 m
1`
4 Satbaria Reg
(Proposed) 1.52 m X 1.82 m
1
5 Noagram
Reg 1.52 m X 1.82 m
1
Share for SWC:17-18 for the maintenance of structures from Sl. 1 Sl. 5 is 11 %
6 Diadanga Bishnapur
1.52 m X 1.82 m 1 Preventive:WMA Periodic:BWDB
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-F Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 4
Sl. No Name of
Structures Vent Size No. Vents
Cost Sharing
7 Daskhin Burikhali
1.52 m X 1.82 m 1 Preventive:WMA Periodic:BWDB
8 Inlet/Outlet Strs 1 No Preventive:WMA Periodic:BWDB
7 WMG office (proposed)
2 Nos Preventive & Periodic by WMA
8 Bridge/ Culverts
(proposed) 2 Nos
Preventive:WMA Periodic:BWDB
9 Tube Well (proposed)
10 Nos Preventive & Periodic by WMA
c) Brick reference Sections Table : 2/3
Sl. No.
Name of Canal Length
of Canal (Km)
Bed Width
(m)
No of 2m Brick
Masonry Cost sharing
1 Liner 4 7.5 8 Pre-WMA
Per-WDB
2 Chachuri 3.25 1.5 6 Pre & Per WMA
3 Maridanga 2 1 4 Pre & Per WMA
4 Noagram 1.6 3.25
3 Pre-WMA
Per-WDB
5 Suorer 1.8 1.25 3 Pre & Per WMA
6 Majhalir 3.4 1 7 Pre & Per WMA
7 Mora 2.8 1 6 Pre & Per WMA
8 Amtola 1.25 1 2 Pre & Per WMA
9 Kumarer 1.8 1.5 2 Pre & Per WMA
10 Takimara 1.5 2
3 Pre-WMA
Per-WDB
11 Satbaria /Gajaria 1.5 2
3 Pre-WMA
Per-WDB
12 Diadanga-Bishnapur 1.75 2 3 Pre & Per WMA
d) Embankment Table : 2/4
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-F Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 5
Length of
Embankment Location Owned by
Type of
Embankment Cost sharing
12.00 From Urushi to
Pateswari
Regulator
BWDB Top earthen Preventive :WMA
& Periodic: WDB
The total operation & maintenance cost and sharing of the cost between BWDB and WMA/WMG for
the SIP SWC 17-18 is given below in Table : 3
Table: 3.
O & M Cost
Borne By
Of Works (Lac Tk)
Embankment Structures Khals/Canals Total
WMA 1.68 0.806 1.672 4.158
BWDB 6.144 4.549 2.566 13.259
Total 7.824 5.355 4.238 17.417
The WMA/WMG share comes to Tk 163 /acre/year and on the other hand the share for BWDB under
JMC comes to Tk 522 /acre/year The O & M Cost sharing is given in Appendix 1.
Maintenance responsibilities and cost sharing between the parties will be finalised during the
negotiations between the WMO and the BWDB.
6 Operational Plan of all Regulators in consultation with the concerned WMG and
WMA
Hydrological analysis were made separately for all the SIPs under NSP & CSP. Basin water levels
have been calculated after matching with the river water levels & rainfall. The basin water levels & the
opening and closing of gates at different time of the year have been shown below for each of the
SIPs. As a start in the first year the gates of the regulators around each SIP may be operated as per
the schedule shown below. The WMG/WMA may be informed that the level has been fixed on
hydrological analysis and as the first year let the run on this basis. On the second year the operation
will be fine tuned on the basis of the recommendations of the WMG/WMA and also on the experience
from the first year’s operation. While preparing the recommendations the WMA / WMG will have
threadbare discussion with the all the stake holders of the SIP. Accumulated basin storage, water
level and probable date of gate opening of SIP SWC :17-18 is given in Table : 4
Table : 4
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-F Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 6
Date River WL Runoff Vol. Gate
Position
Basin condition
(M.PWD) Vol. (ha-m) Storage PWL
11th July 1.69 105.50 Closed 105.50 1.69
31st July 2.56 301.64 Closed 407.14 2.06
15th August 2.52 252.90 Closed 660.04 2.25
31st August 2.79 269.77 Closed 929.81 2.41
16th Sept. 3.12 114.55 Closed 1044.36 2.48
24th Sept. 2.50 57.27 Opened 1101.63 2.51
7. Maintenance Schedule
A yearly maintenance schedule is to be prepared at the beginning of the each financial year which
should be strictly followed to achieve regular and effective maintenance. Maintenance schedule is to
be prepared by BWDB in consultation with the WMOs. Draft maintenance program is to be prepared
by BWDB before 30th June for the works of the next year. Necessary steps like budget allocation,
design drawings for the maintenance work, work authorization, tendering processes are to be initiated
at proper time by the BWDB.
8. Training on Maintenance Issue
Water Management Group (WMG) members shall have to be trained on operation of structure for
proper water management of the project. BWDB officials should be given training on the same issue.
For proper implementation of the maintenance plan, training on maintenance is also to be imparted to
water management groups as well as to the BWDB officials. The training should cover maintenance
needs assessment, types of maintenance work, roles and responsibilities of each party, maintenance
schedule, budgeting and monitoring. Training is also required to be imparted to the gate operators of
all the infrastructure (regulators, sluices and water control structures) the project. Such type of training
should be imparted to the individual gate operator at his concerned gate site showing the practical
operation of the gate by BWDB experts.
9. Rates For Maintenance (Canals/Khals) :
i) Preventive maintenance work on khals and canals includes:
(a) removal of floating debris and water hyacinth and water hyacinth and
(b) cutting grass/weeds prior to the starting of the monsoon.
Preventive maintenance of canals has been taken as Tk.500.00 per Km.
ii) Periodic maintenance work on khals and canals includes mainly desalting and re-excavation of
khals
Average siltation per year has been taken as 10 cm.
Side slope of khals has been taken as 1:!.5 both sides
Silt clearance at the rate of Tk 60.40/cum (BWDB Jessore Circle rate)
The annual maintenance cost of these khals are given Appendix-2
10. Rates For Maintenance (Structures) :
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-F Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 7
a) Preventive Cost: i) Painting area has been taken as vent size area plus 10% more for the angles & others.
ii) Painting @ Tk.225. 44 per sq.m. ( as per schedule of rates of Jessore O&M Circle).
iii) Greasing cost for greasing gearbox Tk 644.02 (as per schedule of rates of Jessore O & M
Circle).
iv) Devris clearance : L.S. Tk.300.00 per structure per year.
v) Gauge painting : L.S Tk.150.00 per meter.
Average 7 meter per structure i.e. Tk. 1,050.00 per structure.
b) Periodic Cost.
Periodic maintenance cost per structure per year has been taken as the 1.5% of total Investment cost.
Investment cost of the existing old structures have been taken as the present cost for the type design
of similar structure in PPTA. The bill of quantities of the type design of same size & vent (1.5 m X 1.8
m) has been updated with the present schedule of rates of Jessore O & M Circle. For example the
PPTA cost for 1 vent (1.5 m X 1.8 m) structure was Tk.53.76 lac which has been updated to Tk
88.49 lac at present schedule of rates.
Periodic cost will include the following :
Replacing of rubber seals ( 1 in 3 years )
Repairing of structures ( 1 in 10 years )
Replacement of gates ( 1 in 15 years)
Replacing wire ropes for pinion gear gate ( 1 in 5 years )
Annual maintenance cost of structure are given in Appendix-3
10. Rates For Maintenance (Embankments) :
a) Preventive maintenance per km of Embankment
During monsoon , 5 months on an average every alternate week ( 6 days a week) : 60 days
During Off-monsoon, 7 months , on an average one week a month ( 6 days a week ) : 42
days
Total 102 days @ Tk. 150 per day = 15300.00
Contingency @ 10 % = 1530.00
!6,830.00
Say,Tk 17,000.00
Assume a fifth of embankment is under some sort repair/maintenance activities hence effective
length of Preventive Maintenance is 0.8 X L ( L= actual length of embankment). Therefore, weighted
average cost per km of embankment is
Tk 17000 X 0.8 = Tk 13,600.00.
Say, Tk 14000.00 per km/year.
b) Periodic Maintenance per km of embankment.
I. Considering Section :
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-F Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 8
Earth Work
4.27m
Considering subsistence @ . 05 m/year
Av. Ht. 2.5 m X- sectional area = 4.27*0.05 + 1/2 0.10*2.5
1:2 1:3 + 1/2 0.15*2.5
= 0.213 + 0.125 + 0.1875
= 0.53 sq.m.
Therefore, per Km. volume of earthwork = 0.53 * 1000 = 530 m3
Cost @ Tk 65.12 per m3 earthwork = Tk.34,513.00
II. Turfing :
Turfing area i.e slope area = { ( 2.5 2 + 7.5 2 ) 1/2 + ( 2.5 2 + 5 2 ) ½ } 1000
= { 7.9 + 5.6 } 1000
= 13.5 * 1000
= 13500 sq. m.
So yearly requirement as per assumption : 10 % of 13500 = 1350 sq. m .
Therefore, per km turfing
Cost @ Tk. 12.37 per sq. m = Tk. 16,699.50
Say, Tk 16,700.00 per km.
As the top of the embankment is carpeted for which periodic Maintenance = Tk 16,700.00
Annual maintenance cost embankment is given in Appendix 4
11. Rates for Maintenance of 2-meter Width Reference Sections on Khals :
As per suggestion of ADB, a 2 (two) meter width brick the masonry reference section have been
provided across each canal at every 500 meter intervals of the length of the canal. This will be
provided at the design bed level of the canal so that while silt clearance is necessary in future it will
act as a reference datum.
a) Preventive Cost:
Considered on a lump sum basis of Tk.500.00 per brick masonry.
b) Periodic Cost:
Considered 0.075 m cement concrete over 0 .075 m brick soling, As per the bed width,height and
side slopes of the canal the estimated cost of the respective 2 meter width reference sections
were calculated on the basis of the schedule of rates of Jessore O & M Circle of BWDB. 1.5 % of
the cost has been taken as the periodic costs of the brick sections.
Annual maintenance cost of structure are given in Appendix-5
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-F Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 9
Cost Sharing in SIP SWC 17-18 Appendix 1
Command
Area ( ha) 1471
Benefitted
Area ( ha) 1030
O & M Cost
O & M Cost
Payable by
WMA
( Tk/Acre/Year )
O & M Cost payable by
BWDB
(Tk/Acre/Year)
Total Cost
(Tk/Acre/Year) Borne By
Of Works (Lac Tk)
Embankment Khals/Canals Structures Total
WMA 1.68 1.672 0.806 4.158 163
BWDB 6.144 2.566 4.549 13.259 522
Total 7.824 4.238 5.355 17.417 685
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-F Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 10
Preventive and Periodic maintenance Cost of Khals / Canals
SWC ; 17-18
Appendix 2
Sl. No
Name of Khal Length of
Khals (Km)
Canal Size Annual Siltation
(m )
Volume of
Siltation m3/Year
Unit Rate of Maintainance
Costs (Tk)
Cost sharing Av. Bottom
Width (m)
Avg. Side
Slopes
Preventive (Tk./Km)
Periodic (Tk./ m3 )
Preventive Periodic Total
1 Liner Khal (1/2 of 8 km)
4 7.5 ! : 1.5 0.1 3060 500 60.4 2000 184824 186824 Pre: WMA Per; WDB
2 Chenchuri Khal 3.25 1.5 ! : 1.5 0.1 536.25 500 60.4 1625 32389.5 34014.5 Pre & Per WMA
3 Maridanga 2 1 ! : 1.5 0.1 230 500 60.4 1000 13892 14892 Pre & Per WMA
4 Noagram 1.6 3.25 ! : 1.5 0.1 544 500 60.4 800 32857.6 33657.6 Pre:WMA Per; WDB
5 Suorer 1.8 1.25 ! : 1.5 0.1 252 500 60.4 900 15220.8 16120.8 Pre & Per WMA
6 Majhair 3.4 1 ! : 1.5 0.1 391 500 60.4 1700 23616.4 25316.4 Pre & Per WMA
7 Mora 2.8 1 ! : 1.5 0.1 322 500 60.4 1400 19448.8 20848.8 Pre & Per WMA
8 Amtola 1.25 1 ! : 1.5 0.1 143.75 500 60.4 625 8682.5 9307.5 Pre & Per WMA
9 Kumarer 1.8 1.5 ! : 1.5 0.1 297 500 60.4 900 17938.8 18838.8 Pre & Per WMA
10 Takimara 1.5 2 ! : 1.5 0.1 322.5 500 60.4 750 19479 20229 Pre:WMA Per; WDB
11 Satbaria/Gajaria 1.5 2 ! : 1.5 0.1 322.5 500 60.4 750 19479 20229 Pre:WMA Per; WDB
12 Diadanga Bishnapur
1.75 2 ! : 1.5 0.1 376.25 500 60.4 875 22725.5 23600.5 Pre & Per WMA
Total 26.65 13325 410553.9 423878.9
In Lac Tk
Canal Maintenance Sharing
Preventive Periodic Total
WMA 0.133 1.539 1.672
BWDB 0 2.566 2.566
Total 0.133 4.105 4.238
Preventive & Periodic Maintenance Costs of Structures
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-F Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 11
Appendix 3
Sl. No.
Name of Structures
Vent Size No.
Vents
Approx Cost of
Structures (lac Tk)
Preventive Cost Periodic Costs=1.5%
of Investment
Costs (Lac Tk.)
Cost Sharing
Painting of Gates Painting Gauge
(Tk)
Greasing of Gates
Others
(Tk.) Total (Tk.) Area
(Sq.m) Cost
(Tk/Sq.m) Costs (Tk)
Cost/ Gate
Costs (Tk.)
1 Pateswari Reg 1.52m X 1.8 2 m
10 327 121.72 225.44 27440.56
1050 644.02 6440.2 300 35230.76 4.91 As the
structures Sl.1 to Sl.5 will
serve the SIPs SWC 16,17-
18,4-6,8,9,14.the O & M cost will also shared among the
SIPs.As these are peripheral
structures ,preventive by WMA/WMG &
periodic by BWDB
2 Takimara Reg 1.52 m X
1.82m 2 117 24.34 225.44
5487.21
1050 644.02 1288.04 300 8125.25 1.76
3 Takimara Reg
(Proposed) 1.52 m X 1.82
m 1 88.49 12.17 225.44
2743.60
1050 644.02 644.02 300 4737.62 1.33
4 Satbaria Reg (Proposed)
1.52 m X 1.82 m
1 88.49 12.17 225.44 2743.6
0 1050 644.02 644.02 300 4737.62 1.33
5 Noagram Reg 1.52 m X 1.82
m 1 88.49 12.17 225.44
2743.60
1050 644.02 644.02 300 4737.62 1.33
Sub-total 57568.88 10.64
Share for SWC:17-18 for the maintenance of structures from Sl. 1 Sl. 5 is 11 % 6332.00 1.17 Preventive:
WMG Periodic: BWDB
6 Diadanga-Bishnapur 1.52 m X 1.82 m
1 88.49 6.08 225.44 1370.68 1050 644.02 644.02 300 3364.70 1.33 Pre: WMG Per:
BWDB
7 Daskhin Burikhali 1.52 m X 1.82 m
1 88.49 6.08 225.44 1370.68 1050 644.02 644.02 300 3364.70 1.33 Pre: WMG Per:
BWDB
8 Inlet/Outlet Strs 1 no 17.14 Lump Sum
500.00 0.26 Pre: WMG Per:
BWDB
9 Bridge/Cul 2 Nos (Pro) 28.6 Lump Sum 1000 0.43
Pre:WMA Per:WDB
10 WMG Offi 2 No ( Pro) 14 Lump Sum 1000 0.21 Pre & Per WMA
11 Tube Well 10 Nos ( Pro) 7 Lump Sum 2500 0.11 Pre & Per WMA
Maintenance cost of structures inSWC 16 18061.39 4.83
Cost sharing among WMA
& BWDB
WMA 18061.39 0.32
BWDB 0 4.51
Total 18061.39 4.83
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-F Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 12
Preventive & Periodic maintenance costs of Embankments
Appendix 4
Length of
Embt(km) Location
Owned
by
Type of
Embt
Avg.Dimensions of Embt Prev.Cost (Lac Tk) Per.Cost (Lac Tk)
Total
(Lac Tk)
Cost
Sharing
Slopes Ht(m)
Top
Width(m)
Unit Rate
per
Km(Lac
Tk)
Total
(Lac Tk)
Unit Rate
per
Km(Lac
Tk)
Total
(Lac Tk)
12
From
Urushi to
Pateswari
BWDB Earthen C[S:1:2
R/S:1:3 2.5 4.27 0.14 1.680 0.512 6.144 7.824
Pre:WMA
Per:WDB
Total 1.680 6.144 7.824
WMA 1.680 0
WDB 0 6.144
Brick Masonry Reference Sections on Khals
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-F Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 13
Preventive & Periodic Maintenance cost of 2m Wide Brick Masonry on Khals in SWC 17-18 Appendix 5
Sl. No.
Name of Canal
Length of
Canal (Km)
Bed Width
(m)
No of 2m Brick
Masonry Unit Cost of one Khal Brick Masonry (Lac Tk)
App.Cost Masonry (Lac Tk)
Preventive Cost Tk 500 per brick
Masonry (Lac Tk)
Periodic Costs=1.5% of
Investment Costs (Lac Tk)
Cost sharing
1 Liner 4 7.5 8 0.193 1.544 0.04 0.023 Pre-WMA Per-WDB
2 Chachuri 3.25 1.5 6 0.113 0.678 0.030 0.010 Pre & Per WMA
3 Maridanga 2 1 4 0.107 0.428 0.020 0.006 Pre & Per WMA
4 Noagram 1.6 3.25 3
0.137 0.411 0.015
0.006 Pre-WMA Per-WDB
5 Suorer 1.8 1.25 3 0.11 0.33 0.015 0.005 Pre & Per WMA
6 Majhalir 3.4 1 7 0.107 0.749 0.035 0.011 Pre & Per WMA
7 Mora 2.8 1 6 0.102 0.612 0.030 0.009 Pre & Per WMA
8 Amtola 1.25 1 2 0.107 0.214 0.010 0.003 Pre & Per WMA
9 Kumarer 1.8 1.5 2 0.113 0.226 0.010 0.003 Pre & Per WMA
10 Takimara 1.5 2 3
0.12 0.36 0.015
0.005 Pre-WMA Per-WDB
11 Satbaria /Gajaria 1.5 2
3 0.12
0.36 0.015 0.005
Pre-WMA Per-WDB
12 Diadanga-Bishnapur 1.75 2
3 0.12
0.36 0.015 0.005
Pre & Per WMA
Total 0.250 0.094
Total A + B Preventive (Lac Tk) Periodic(Lac
Tk) Total
WMA 0.431 0.375 0.806 WMA 0.250 0.055
BWDB 0 4.549 4.549 WDB 0.000 0.039
Total 0.431 4.924 5.355
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-F
Annex-A
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria 14
Map of SWC : 17-18
ANNEX – G
HYDROLOGY
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-G
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 1
HYDROLOGY
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background The proposed study area is located in the Southwest Coastal Region of Bangladesh. The project area is bounded by the Chitra river on the West and by the Nabaganga river on the North, South and East. Both the rivers tidal and thus the drainage of the study area are governed by the tidal fluctuation of these rivers. In variably the entire southwest region has been suffering from tidal intrusion and monsoon drainage congestion over the years. In order to prevent the salinity intrusion and tidal flooding the study area is enclosed by constructing coastal embankment with water control structures for drainage of the polder areas. But at present most of the controlling structures are not full functioning and some of the internal drainage khals have been severely silted up as well, which prevents the people to get full benefit out of the existing project condition. In view of the above fact, the hydrological analysis has been carried out to provide a justification of decision making for planning, design and improved O&M of the controlling structures. 1.2 Objective of the Study The main objective of this hydrological study is to review and improve the existing drainage plan and to generate data for assessing the inundation patterns with and without project situations. 1.3 Study Area The study area is mainly concentrated in the SIP SWC-17+18 areas of Chenchury Beel Sub-project under SWAIWRPMP. The area is located in the two unions namely Perulia and Purulia under Kalia Upazila of Narail District. The whole area of Chenchuri Beel Sub-project has been divided into a number of sub-catchments considering formation of Water Management Organisations (WMO) and existing drainage patterns. The proposed study area (SIP SWC-17+18) is located at the most downstream part of the Chenchuri Beel Sub-project which seems to be the lowest part of the project in terms of land elevation. The total area of SWC-17+18 is about 1470 ha. The average land elevation is about 2.15 m, PWD. Maximum land of the area is within the elevation of 1.75 m PWD and 3.0 m PWD covering about 95% of these SIP areas. Agriculture is the main earning source of income of the people of the project area which is most frequently affected by tidal intrusion through the existing structures and monsoon drainage congestion. The entire project area is criss-crossed by numerous drainage channels which are mostly silted up as mentioned earlier. The location map of the study area is shown in the Figure 1.1. & Figure 1.2.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-G
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 2
Figure 1.1: Map of Chenchuri Beel Sub-Project showing Study Area 2. Data Collection and Analysis The study has been carried out mainly based on the secondary data collected from BWDB and previous study reports. 2.1 Water Level Data
Figure 1.1: Map of Chenchuri Beel Sub-Project showing Study Area
Chenchuri-Beel Sub-Project
SIP 16
SIP 17 & 18
Study Area
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-G
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 3
Figure 1.2: Map of Proposed SIP, SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-G
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 4
2. HYDROLOGICAL ANALYSIS 2.1 Rainfall Data The nearest rainfall station to the study area is located at Narail (R-461) maintained by BWDB. The rainfall data is available from 1965 to 2007.Monthly Maximum, Mean & Minimum rainfall table, Annual & Monthly rainfall and 5-Day rainfall analysis (Maximum Rainfall Depth-Duration Data) table are shown below. That table is computed from 1987 to 2007 (20 years) data.
Table 2.1.1: Monthly Maximum, Mean & Minimum rainfall ( mm )
Rainfall station : R- 461 ( Narail )
Year Parameter January February March April May June July August September October November December
1987 Max= 0.00 0.00 10.20 81.30 33.00 99.10 105.40 259.10 39.40 14.00 84.30 7.60
Mean= 0.00 0.00 0.98 5.72 2.37 12.99 18.66 21.08 5.88 1.07 3.33 0.33
Min= 0 0 2.5 5.1 2.5 5.1 2 1.3 1.3 9.1 1.5 2.5
1988 Max= 0.00 0.00 39.90 122.40 55.90 78.70 76.20 62.00 25.90 27.20 50.80 0.00
Mean= 0.00 0.00 3.17 5.21 9.23 14.51 12.10 14.53 3.65 3.43 3.62 0.00
Min= 0 7.6 5.1 7.6 2.5 1 1.5 0.8 0.5 5.1 27.2 0
1989 Max= 0.00 28.40 2.00 50.80 106.70 40.10 41.10 31.80 48.80 90.70 0.00 1.30
Mean= 0.00 1.12 0.08 1.70 10.50 8.98 8.95 4.27 5.70 7.44 0.00 0.04
Min= 0 3 0.5 0.3 0.3 7.9 2.3 2.3 1.5 5.1 0 1.3
1990 Max= 0.00 31.80 56.60 31.80 63.50 38.10 60.20 46.20 101.60 44.50 22.10 5.10
Mean= 0.00 2.94 4.50 1.86 8.97 6.38 10.48 4.47 9.54 5.96 1.33 0.16
Min= 0 2.5 2.5 7.6 2.5 2.5 1.3 2.3 5.1 5.1 2.5 5.1
1991 Max= 31.50 15.20 31.80 40.60 69.90 66.00 33.50 137.20 147.80 63.50 0.00 59.70
Mean= 1.22 0.54 1.35 3.26 4.96 13.32 7.35 10.38 15.78 6.12 0.00 2.50
Min= 6.4 15.2 10.2 20.3 5.1 1.3 5.1 4.6 7.1 2.5 0 17.8
1992 Max= 20.30 20.30 0.00 12.70 96.50 238.30 120.70 71.10 37.00 3.00 0.00 0.00
Mean= 0.65 2.28 0.00 0.42 8.77 16.07 22.09 8.03 5.58 0.19 0.00 0.00
Min= 20.3 5.1 0 12.7 7.6 2.5 15.2 5.1 9 1.4 0 0
1993 Max= 0.00 54.00 45.00 45.00 74.00 90.00 69.00 60.00 71.00 67.00 10.00 0.00
Mean= 0.00 1.93 2.97 3.70 9.55 16.97 9.87 11.26 10.47 4.10 0.33 0.00
Min= 0 54 15 7 5 4 4 4 4 6 10 0
1994 Max= 0.00 45.00 25.00 50.00 69.00 120.00 100.00 75.00 30.00 9.00 0.00 0.00
Mean= 0.00 2.29 0.81 3.27 6.97 11.20 11.87 10.03 2.57 0.29 0.00 0.00
Min= 0 19 25 15 10 4 5 5 10 9 0 0
1995 Max= 0.00 23.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 110.00 0.00
Mean= 0.00 1.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.57 0.00
Min= 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0
1996 Max= 35.00 9.00 20.00 45.00 67.00 150.00 33.00 71.00 52.00 210.00 75.00 0.00
Mean= 1.13 0.55 0.65 1.73 4.74 17.53 4.45 10.19 3.67 9.90 2.50 0.00
Min= 35 7 20 2 25 10 4 9 4 22 75 0
1997 Max= 0.00 30.00 23.00 23.00 35.00 55.00 40.00 60.00 76.00 40.00 20.00 15.00
Mean= 0.00 2.50 0.74 2.77 3.71 8.33 11.77 7.06 16.67 1.29 0.67 0.87
Min= 0 10 23 10 15 5 5 5 10 40 20 12
1998 Max= 20.00 17.00 95.00 36.00 75.00 15.00 60.00 38.00 45.00 50.00 55.00 0.00
Mean= 1.00 0.93 4.52 2.97 5.16 2.33 10.71 6.03 7.50 4.81 4.00 0.00
Min= 11 9 12 8 10 5 6 5 6 10 25 0
1999 Max= 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.00 70.00 43.00 60.00 86.00 70.00 52.00 0.00 0.00
Mean= 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.07 4.35 4.40 10.06 12.32 10.87 8.03 0.00 0.00
Min= 0 0 0 10 5 3 3 8 6 5 0 0
2000 Max= 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 48.00 100.80 98.00 120.00 180.00 105.00 0.00 0.00
Mean= 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.40 6.61 11.83 12.58 10.87 15.90 5.19 0.00 0.00
Min= 0 0 0 15 5 10 10 5 4 8 0 0
2001 Max= 0.00 20.00 14.00 20.00 14.00 15.00 60.00 65.00 45.00 35.00 30.00 0.00
Mean= 0.00 1.25 0.45 2.17 2.00 5.97 6.71 4.10 3.13 4.58 66.32 0.00
Min= 0 15 14 5 8 4 4 10 7 10 10 0
2002 Max= 15.00 0.00 30.00 60.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 80.00 45.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mean= 0.81 0.00 1.19 3.33 8.90 18.20 8.42 16.19 8.70 0.00 0.00 0.00
Min= 10 0 7 15 5 5 7 5 5 0 0 0
2003 Max= 0.00 0.00 42.00 40.00 28.00 80.00 58.00 32.00 0.00 73.00 0.00 7.00
Mean= 0.00 0.00 3.68 3.37 2.29 12.63 10.74 4.42 0.00 8.45 0.00 0.52
Min= 0 0 15 15 10 10 10 5 0 5 0 4
2004 Max= 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 54.00 36.00 30.00 67.00 122.00 44.00 10.00 0.00
Mean= 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.83 5.26 9.47 4.06 6.52 19.73 4.77 64.97 0.00
Min= 0 0 0 25 6 10 8 10 12 10 10 0
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-G
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 5
Table 2.1.2 : Monthly & Annual rainfall Rainfall station : R-461 ( Narail )
Year Annual
rainfall (mm) January
(mm) February
(mm) March (mm)
April (mm)
May (mm)
June (mm)
July (mm)
August (mm)
September (mm)
October (mm)
November (mm)
December (mm)
1987 2217 0 0 31 172 74 390 579 653 177 33 100 10
1988 2176 0 50 98 156 286 435 375 451 110 106 109 0
1989 1493 0 31 3 51 326 269 278 132 171 231 0 1
1990 1727 0 82 140 56 278 191 325 139 286 185 40 5
1991 1999 38 15 42 98 154 400 228 322 474 190 0 78
1992 1940 20 66 0 13 272 482 685 249 168 6 0 0
1993 2168 0 54 92 111 296 509 306 349 314 127 10 0
1994 1504 0 64 25 98 216 336 368 311 77 9 0 0
1995 230 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 197 0
1996 1707 35 16 20 52 147 526 138 316 110 307 75 0
1997 1712 0 70 23 83 115 250 365 219 500 40 20 27
1998 1498 31 26 140 89 160 70 332 187 225 149 120 0
1999 1568 0 0 0 32 135 132 312 382 326 249 0 0
2000 2057 0 0 0 132 205 355 390 337 477 161 0 0
2001 981 0 35 14 65 62 179 208 127 94 142 55 0
2002 1983 25 0 37 100 276 546 261 502 261 0 0 0
2003 1413 0 0 114 101 71 379 333 137 0 262 0 16
2004 1550 0 0 0 25 163 284 126 202 592 148 10 0
2005 1493 12 0 144 66 72 120 449 110 86 446 0 0
2006 1151 0 0 0 26 221 255 0 148 447 54 0 0
2007 1969 0 0 0 0 228 0 562 252 325 359 243 0
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-G
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 6
Table 2.1.3 : 5-Day rainfall analysis ( Maximum Rainfall Depth-Duration Data) Rainfall station : 461 ( Narail )
Year Premonsoon Monsoon
1-DAY 2-Day 3-DAY 4-Day 5-DAY 1-DAY 2-Day 3-DAY 4-Day 5-DAY
1987 99.1 160.1 231.5 245.5 245.5 259.1 309.9 386.1 395.5 395.5
1988 78.7 108.2 159 179.3 197.1 62 62.8 62.8 62.8 63.6
1989 40.1 40.1 40.1 40.1 40.1 31.8 31.8 31.8 31.8 31.8
1990 38.1 38.1 38.1 38.1 38.1 46.2 77.4 77.4 77.4 77.4
1991 66 66 66 101.6 111.8 137.2 149.9 149.9 149.9 149.9
1992 238.3 238.3 238.3 268.8 269 71.1 86.3 86.3 86.3 86.3
1993 90 90 90 165 186 60 60 105 130 130
1994 120 165 169 169 169 75 75 105 135 167
1995 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1996 150 175 175 175 258 71 80 80 80 80
1997 55 55 55 78 78 60 72 72 72 72
1998 15 25 40 55 60 38 47 57 69 74
1999 43 43 43 43 43 86 108 164 164 164
2000 100.8 100.8 122.8 132.8 165.8 120 157 197 197 197
2001 15 29 29 39 39 65 94 117 127 127
2002 75 75 110 180 215 80 130 130 130 130
2003 80 112 144 154 154 32 37 37 37 37
2004 36 36 36 36 36 67 97 97 97 97
2005 45 53 61 76 81 30 30 30 30 30
2006 180 194 194 194 194 31 61 61 61 61
2007 0 0 0 0 0 45 50 50 50 58
No. of Data 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0
Mean(mm) 74.5 85.9 97.2 112.9 122.9 69.9 86.5 99.8 103.9 106.1 Std Dev 59.9 66.7 74.1 80.0 88.2 53.2 64.3 81.2 83.2 83.7
Max(mm) 238.3 238.3 238.3 268.8 269.0 259.1 309.9 386.1 395.5 395.5
Min(mm) 15 25 29 36 36 31 30 30 31.8 30
Frequency Analysis of Individual Month using Extreme Value Distribution
1 in 2 17 76 87 103 113 60 77 90 94 96
1 in 5 126 137 148 164 174 121 138 151 155 157
1 in 10 178 189 200 216 226 173 189 203 207 209
1 in 20 233 244 255 271 281 228 245 258 262 264
1 in 25 268 279 290 306 316 263 280 293 297 299
1 in 30 188 199 211 226 236 183 200 213 217 220
1 in 50 243 255 266 282 292 239 255 269 273 275
80% dep.
1.25 17 29 40 56 66 13 29 43 47 49
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-G
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 7
2.2 Topographic Data Topographic data is so basic and very important for the assessment of inundation patterns during monsoon in the various SIP areas. Accurate topographic data is also needed for assessment of benefited areas with project conditions in terms of land classification coverage. The topographic data that has been used in this study are collected from the secondary sources. The Project Map of the Chenchuri Beel Sub-project available from PPTA has been updated by incorporating contour lines taken from the topographical maps prepared by SOB with the help of CEGIS. The map has been updated incorporating other features such as alignment of the khals, location of the beels etc. The contour lines are at an interval of 0.25m. Area-Elevation & Storage-Elevation curves have been prepared using the updated contour map by planimetering for the use in hydrological analysis and land classification. The topographic map showing contour lines is presented in Figure 2.3.
Figure 2.3: Topographic map of the study area (SIP 16, 17 &18) showing contour lines
SIP-16
SIP-17 & 18
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-G
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 8
2.3 Water Level Data Daily water level data (Station: Gazirhat-SW219, Nabaganga river) of the peripheral rivers of the project area has been analysed to determine the monthly maximum water level, monthly mean water level and frequency analysis of water level and also are presented hydrograph Table 2.3.1 : Monthly Maximum water level (mPWD)
Year Parameter January February March April May June July August September October November December
1984 Max (H.Tide)= 1.94 2.04 2.14 2.34 2.49 3.17 3.58 3.58 3.59 3.28 2.18 1.91
Max (L.tide)= 0.49 0.34 0.24 0.44 0.79 1.89 2.58 2.98 3.08 2.55 1.18 0.71
1985 Max (H.Tide)= 1.79 1.94 2.11 2.16 2.44 2.44 3.27 3.50 3.47 3.39 2.85 2.12
Max (L.tide)= 0.36 0.21 0.29 0.34 0.74 1.14 2.10 2.51 2.64 2.61 1.81 0.87
1986 Max (H.Tide)= 1.80 1.79 2.09 2.31 2.39 2.44 3.08 3.54 3.46 3.33 2.66 2.06
Max (L.tide)= 0.36 0.18 0.19 0.49 0.64 0.99 2.15 2.58 3.06 2.46 1.31 0.61
1987 Max (H.Tide)= 1.85 1.85 1.92 2.18 2.18 2.51 3.24 3.87 3.84 3.37 2.55 2.02
Max (L.tide)= 0.25 0.20 0.10 0.38 0.42 1.09 1.94 3.17 3.19 2.87 1.32 0.77
1988 Max (H.Tide)= 1.85 2.11 2.20 2.38 2.49 2.76 3.43 3.93 3.92 2.96 2.44 2.24
Max (L.tide)= 0.48 0.36 0.38 0.43 1.04 1.36 2.40 3.03 3.36 1.96 1.14 1.14
1989 Max (H.Tide)= 1.80 2.10 2.25 2.30 2.50 2.72 3.37 3.38 3.38 3.15 2.43 1.94
Max (L.tide)= 0.28 0.30 0.20 0.47 1.10 1.42 2.42 2.40 2.32 1.95 1.07 0.47
1990 Max (H.Tide)= 1.91 2.14 2.37 2.52 2.44 2.74 3.53 3.60 3.23 3.33 2.70 2.10
Max (L.tide)= 0.12 0.12 0.30 0.62 0.77 1.42 2.53 2.81 2.30 2.43 1.20 0.48
1991 Max (H.Tide)= 2.01 1.91 2.19 2.36 2.51 2.78 3.17 3.51 3.86 3.09 2.37 2.13
Max (L.tide)= 0.36 0.13 0.11 0.34 0.76 1.29 1.84 2.48 2.96 1.81 1.05 0.53
1992 Max (H.Tide)= 2.11 2.30 2.39 2.33 2.45 2.66 3.06 3.43 3.36 2.86 2.40 2.06
Max (L.tide)= 0.29 0.21 0.24 0.30 0.76 1.16 1.64 2.01 2.15 1.45 1.09 0.60
1993 Max (H.Tide)= 2.02 2.20 2.24 2.32 2.97 2.85 3.20 3.60 3.65 3.40 2.54 2.28
Max (L.tide)= 0.25 0.27 0.30 0.45 0.82 1.25 1.90 2.25 2.45 2.22 1.47 0.62
1994 Max (H.Tide)= 2.17 2.37 2.67 2.69 2.60 2.85 3.23 3.65 3.40 2.93 2.42 2.17
Max (L.tide)= 0.42 0.24 0.35 0.45 0.60 1.30 1.81 2.30 2.08 1.23 0.52 0.22
1995 Max (H.Tide)= 1.92 2.12 2.22 2.16 2.44 2.44 3.27 3.50 3.47 3.39 2.85 2.12
Max (L.tide)= 0.12 0.12 0.22 0.34 0.74 1.14 2.10 2.51 2.64 2.61 1.81 0.87
1996 Max (H.Tide)= 1.93 2.31 2.33 2.53 2.58 2.73 3.65 3.90 3.82 3.22 2.94 2.38
Max (L.tide)= 0.20 0.20 0.28 0.38 0.73 1.01 2.30 2.55 2.74 1.52 1.36 0.66
1997 Max (H.Tide)= 2.38 2.52 2.62 2.63 2.82 2.88 3.68 3.79 3.53 3.25 2.53 2.13
Max (L.tide)= 0.40 0.26 0.41 0.55 0.76 1.16 2.30 2.15 2.37 1.54 0.83 0.38
1998 Max (H.Tide)= 2.18 2.46 2.61 2.78 3.37 3.47 4.23 4.40 4.02 3.35 2.97 2.47
Max (L.tide)= 0.83 0.48 0.36 0.53 1.39 1.67 3.03 3.35 3.28 1.61 1.28 0.78
1999 Max (H.Tide)= 2.36 2.45 2.58 2.82 2.93 3.06 3.65 4.01 4.02 3.88 3.03 2.56
Max (L.tide)= 0.56 0.46 0.38 0.68 0.83 1.08 2.25 2.65 2.75 2.65 1.62 0.71
2000 Max (H.Tide)= 2.36 2.45 2.58 2.79 2.84 3.50 3.62 3.85 3.69 3.56 2.83 2.40
Max (L.tide)= 0.61 0.49 0.48 0.85 1.11 1.90 2.05 2.57 2.44 1.88 1.12 0.78
2001 Max (H.Tide)= 2.24 2.24 2.33 2.58 2.44 2.96 3.10 1.57 1.70 1.34 3.12 2.71
Max (L.tide)= 0.44 0.34 0.62 0.27 0.77 1.17 1.27 0.14 0.20 -0.32 1.24 0.86
2002 Max (H.Tide)= 2.46 2.75 3.02 3.09 3.37 3.62 4.02 4.25 4.07 3.92 3.21 1.88
Max (L.tide)= 0.39 0.42 0.49 0.62 1.22 1.82 2.57 2.87 2.63 2.14 1.52 0.08
2003
Max (H.Tide)= 2.76 2.87 3.10 3.46 3.56 3.43 4.30 4.44 4.46 4.24 3.50 3.10
Max (L.tide)= 0.76 0.71 0.71 0.91 1.36 1.46 2.81 2.83 2.96 2.77 2.11 1.36
Max (L.tide)= 1.00 0.87 1.13 1.07 1.56 2.07 3.47 2.82 3.08 3.05 1.87 1.72
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-G
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 9
Table 2.3.2 : Monthly Mean water level (mPWD)
Year Parameter January February March April May June July August September October November December
1984 Max (H.Tide)= 1.61 1.48 1.69 1.92 2.25 2.72 3.15 3.38 3.48 2.79 2.03 1.73
Max (L.tide)= 0.39 0.10 0.17 0.30 0.63 1.43 2.09 2.61 2.89 1.78 0.78 0.51
1985 Max (H.Tide)= 1.52 1.51 1.76 1.78 2.00 2.29 2.81 3.29 3.27 3.12 2.42 1.90
Max (L.tide)= 0.24 0.14 0.22 0.21 0.47 0.87 1.58 2.30 2.34 2.21 1.23 0.64
1986 Max (H.Tide)= 1.50 0.99 1.45 1.85 1.97 2.09 2.77 3.22 3.18 2.95 2.29 1.69
Max (L.tide)= 0.22 -0.36 -0.04 0.28 0.43 0.61 1.52 2.22 2.22 1.95 1.08 0.42
1987 Max (H.Tide)= 1.34 1.24 0.56 1.73 1.87 2.19 2.86 3.56 3.70 2.73 2.24 1.82
Max (L.tide)= 0.03 -0.17 -0.98 0.15 0.28 0.74 1.57 2.78 3.07 1.73 1.04 0.55
1988 Max (H.Tide)= 1.51 1.57 1.62 1.87 2.15 2.54 3.00 3.54 3.55 2.63 2.08 1.83
Max (L.tide)= 0.20 0.21 0.15 0.30 0.67 1.16 1.84 2.66 2.73 1.41 0.77 0.53
1989 Max (H.Tide)= 1.32 1.62 1.59 1.86 2.14 2.42 2.84 3.17 3.15 2.84 2.10 1.68
Max (L.tide)= -0.03 0.11 0.03 0.24 0.55 1.00 1.66 2.07 2.06 1.65 0.79 0.28
1990 Max (H.Tide)= 1.38 1.59 1.55 2.02 2.10 2.50 3.14 3.40 3.00 2.79 2.19 1.78
Max (L.tide)= -0.07 0.06 -0.12 0.34 0.47 1.03 1.95 2.56 1.94 1.74 0.87 0.34
1991 Max (H.Tide)= 1.44 1.34 1.49 1.83 2.19 2.50 2.89 3.24 3.45 2.69 2.08 1.80
Max (L.tide)= 0.00 -0.22 -0.19 0.12 0.51 0.95 1.52 2.15 2.48 1.34 0.69 0.34
1992 Max (H.Tide)= 1.59 1.57 1.80 1.91 2.15 2.26 2.55 3.03 3.05 2.67 2.17 1.81
Max (L.tide)= 0.15 -0.01 0.12 0.21 0.43 0.66 0.98 1.60 1.77 1.21 0.76 0.35
1993 Max (H.Tide)= 1.02 1.41 1.28 1.88 2.21 2.50 2.86 3.23 3.38 2.93 2.26 2.02
Max (L.tide)= -0.45 -0.23 -0.42 0.12 0.53 0.92 1.37 1.96 2.31 1.51 0.78 0.47
1994 Max (H.Tide)= 1.86 1.82 2.03 2.17 2.25 2.46 2.94 3.31 3.06 2.49 1.97 1.80
Max (L.tide)= 0.29 0.19 0.21 0.32 0.45 0.74 1.34 2.07 1.64 0.81 0.31 0.14
1995 Max (H.Tide)= 0.64 1.10 0.92 1.78 2.00 2.29 2.81 3.29 3.27 3.12 2.42 1.90
Max (L.tide)= -0.93 -0.56 -0.89 0.21 0.47 0.87 1.58 2.30 2.34 2.21 1.23 0.64
1996 Max (H.Tide)= 1.65 1.75 1.81 2.03 2.39 2.46 3.14 3.46 3.41 2.88 2.51 2.09
Max (L.tide)= 0.04 0.02 0.06 0.16 0.50 0.65 1.47 2.15 2.16 1.33 0.98 0.47
1997 Max (H.Tide)= 1.93 1.99 2.15 2.17 2.36 2.60 3.08 3.29 3.21 2.57 2.22 1.90
Max (L.tide)= 0.20 0.17 0.26 0.23 0.50 0.73 1.45 1.84 1.81 0.88 0.54 0.28
1998 Max (H.Tide)= 1.76 1.82 2.01 2.20 2.58 3.25 3.87 4.12 3.57 2.92 2.60 2.16
Max (L.tide)= 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.27 0.63 1.40 2.42 2.98 2.54 1.39 0.99 0.50
1999 Max (H.Tide)= 2.11 2.12 2.08 2.34 2.55 2.73 3.34 3.62 3.70 3.28 2.65 2.28
Max (L.tide)= 0.31 0.22 0.21 0.43 0.63 0.86 1.79 2.31 2.52 1.87 0.99 0.63
2000 Max (H.Tide)= 2.08 2.04 2.20 2.40 2.55 2.97 3.41 3.55 3.46 2.94 2.47 2.13
Max (L.tide)= 0.43 0.29 0.31 0.46 0.68 1.20 1.90 2.18 2.18 1.33 0.78 0.51
2001 Max (H.Tide)= 1.92 2.00 2.05 2.08 2.10 2.68 1.70 1.30 1.31 1.03 2.65 2.35
Max (L.tide)= 0.29 0.19 0.15 0.04 0.47 0.84 0.02 -0.17 -0.16 -0.60 0.98 0.62
2002 Max (H.Tide)= 2.04 2.20 2.40 2.58 2.89 3.20 3.73 4.02 3.80 3.42 2.00 1.60
Max (L.tide)= 0.30 0.32 0.33 0.44 0.85 1.41 1.97 2.59 2.18 1.68 0.22 -0.18
2003 Max (H.Tide)= 2.25 2.35 2.57 2.82 3.05 3.21 3.88 4.09 4.16 3.83 3.32 2.95
Max (L.tide)= 0.50 0.58 0.59 0.71 1.02 1.24 2.34 2.54 2.78 2.27 1.61 1.20
2004 Max (H.Tide)= 2.61 2.27 2.52 2.94 3.22 3.44 4.03 4.27 4.35 4.01 3.30 3.10
Max (L.tide)= 0.89 0.48 0.58 0.82 1.19 1.40 2.33 2.60 2.65 2.34 1.59 1.38
Average monthly H.Tide 1.67 1.70 1.79 2.10 2.33 2.63 3.08 3.40 3.36 2.89 2.38 2.01
Average monthly L.Tide 0.15 0.08 0.04 0.30 0.59 0.99 1.65 2.21 2.21 1.53 0.90 0.51
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-G
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 10
Table 2.3.3 : Frequency Analysis of River Water Level
River : Nabaganga Flow Type : Tidal
Station : SW219, Gazirhat, Narail Period : 1984 to 2004
Year Monthly Maximum & Minimum Water Level (m, PWD)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL
1984 1.94 0.49 2.04 0.34 2.14 0.24 2.34 0.44 2.49 0.79 3.17 1.89 3.58 2.58 3.58 2.98 3.59 3.08 3.28 2.55 2.18 1.18 1.91 0.71
1985 1.79 0.36 1.94 0.21 2.11 0.29 2.16 0.34 2.44 0.74 2.44 1.14 3.27 2.10 3.50 2.51 3.47 2.64 3.39 2.61 2.85 1.81 2.12 0.87
1986 1.80 0.36 1.79 0.18 2.09 0.19 2.31 0.49 2.39 0.64 2.44 0.99 3.08 2.15 3.54 2.58 3.46 3.06 3.33 2.46 2.66 1.31 2.06 0.61
1987 1.85 0.25 1.85 0.20 1.92 0.10 2.18 0.38 2.18 0.42 2.51 1.09 3.24 1.94 3.87 3.17 3.84 3.19 3.37 2.87 2.55 1.32 2.02 0.77
1988 1.85 0.48 2.11 0.36 2.20 0.38 2.38 0.43 2.49 1.04 2.76 1.36 3.43 2.40 3.93 3.03 3.92 3.36 2.96 1.96 2.44 1.14 2.24 1.14
1989 1.80 0.28 2.10 0.30 2.25 0.20 2.30 0.47 2.50 1.10 2.72 1.42 3.37 2.42 3.38 2.40 3.38 2.32 3.15 1.95 2.43 1.07 1.94 0.47
1990 1.91 0.12 2.14 0.12 2.37 0.30 2.52 0.62 2.44 0.77 2.74 1.42 3.53 2.53 3.60 2.81 3.23 2.30 3.33 2.43 2.70 1.20 2.10 0.48
1991 2.01 0.36 1.91 0.13 2.19 0.11 2.36 0.34 2.51 0.76 2.78 1.29 3.17 1.84 3.51 2.48 3.86 2.96 3.09 1.81 2.37 1.05 2.13 0.53
1992 2.11 0.29 2.30 0.21 2.39 0.24 2.33 0.30 2.45 0.76 2.66 1.16 3.06 1.64 3.43 2.01 3.36 2.15 2.86 1.45 2.40 1.09 2.06 0.60
1993 2.02 0.25 2.20 0.27 2.24 0.30 2.32 0.45 2.97 0.82 2.85 1.25 3.20 1.90 3.60 2.25 3.65 2.45 3.40 2.22 2.54 1.47 2.28 0.62
1994 2.17 0.42 2.37 0.24 2.67 0.35 2.69 0.45 2.60 0.60 2.85 1.30 3.23 1.81 3.65 2.30 3.40 2.08 2.93 1.23 2.42 0.52 2.17 0.22
1995 1.92 0.12 2.12 0.12 2.22 0.22 2.16 0.34 2.44 0.74 2.44 1.14 3.27 2.10 3.50 2.51 3.47 2.64 3.39 2.61 2.85 1.81 2.12 0.87
1996 1.93 0.20 2.31 0.20 2.33 0.28 2.53 0.38 2.58 0.73 2.73 1.01 3.65 2.30 3.90 2.55 3.82 2.74 3.22 1.52 2.94 1.36 2.38 0.66
1997 2.38 0.40 2.52 0.26 2.62 0.41 2.63 0.55 2.82 0.76 2.88 1.16 3.68 2.30 3.79 2.15 3.53 2.37 3.25 1.54 2.53 0.83 2.13 0.38
1998 2.18 0.83 2.46 0.48 2.61 0.36 2.78 0.53 3.37 1.39 3.47 1.67 4.23 3.03 4.40 3.35 4.02 3.28 3.35 1.61 2.97 1.28 2.47 0.78
1999 2.36 0.56 2.45 0.46 2.58 0.38 2.82 0.68 2.93 0.83 3.06 1.08 3.65 2.25 4.01 2.65 4.02 2.75 3.88 2.65 3.03 1.62 2.56 0.71
2000 2.36 0.61 2.45 0.49 2.58 0.48 2.79 0.85 2.84 1.11 3.50 1.90 3.62 2.05 3.85 2.57 3.69 2.44 3.56 1.88 2.83 1.12 2.40 0.78
2001 2.24 0.44 2.24 0.34 2.33 0.62 2.58 0.27 2.44 0.77 2.96 1.17 3.10 1.27 1.57 0.14 1.70 0.20 1.34 -0.32 3.12 1.24 2.71 0.86
2002 2.46 0.39 2.75 0.42 3.02 0.49 3.09 0.62 3.37 1.22 3.62 1.82 4.02 2.57 4.25 2.87 4.07 2.63 3.92 2.14 3.21 1.52 1.88 0.08
2003 2.76 0.76 2.87 0.71 3.10 0.71 3.46 0.91 3.56 1.36 3.43 1.46 4.30 2.81 4.44 2.83 4.46 2.96 4.24 2.77 3.50 2.11 3.10 1.36
2004 2.99 1.00 2.65 0.87 3.08 1.13 3.35 1.07 3.55 1.56 3.70 2.07 4.55 3.47 4.61 2.82 4.86 3.08 4.42 3.05 3.56 1.87 3.44 1.72
No. of Data = 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21
Mean, X = 2.13 0.43 2.27 0.33 2.43 0.37 2.58 0.52 2.73 0.90 2.94 1.37 3.53 2.26 3.71 2.52 3.66 2.60 3.32 2.05 2.77 1.33 2.30 0.72
Stdev = 0.33 0.23 0.29 0.19 0.33 0.23 0.37 0.21 0.41 0.29 0.40 0.32 0.43 0.49 0.60 0.64 0.59 0.67 0.60 0.75 0.37 0.37 0.39 0.36
Co-eff. of Skewness = 1.19 1.02 0.32 1.4 0.8 1.96 1.12 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.9 1.1 0.5 -2.06 -2.6 -1.4 -2.40 -1.35 -1.52 0.64 0.17 1.72 0.97
Feequency:
1 in 2 2.08 0.39 2.22 0.30 2.38 0.33 2.51 0.48 2.66 0.85 2.87 1.32 3.46 2.18 3.61 2.42 3.56 2.49 3.22 1.92 2.70 1.27 2.23 0.67
1 in 2.33 2.14 0.43 2.27 0.33 2.43 0.37 2.58 0.52 2.73 0.90 2.94 1.37 3.54 2.26 3.71 2.52 3.66 2.60 3.32 2.05 2.77 1.33 2.30 0.73
1 in 5 2.37 0.59 2.48 0.47 2.67 0.54 2.84 0.67 3.03 1.11 3.22 1.60 3.84 2.61 4.14 2.98 4.08 3.08 3.75 2.59 2.65 1.60 2.58 0.99
1 in 10 2.56 0.72 2.65 0.58 2.86 0.67 3.06 0.79 3.27 1.28 3.46 1.79 4.09 2.90 4.50 3.36 4.43 3.47 4.11 3.03 3.25 1.81 2.81 1.20
1 in 20 2.74 0.85 2.81 0.69 3.05 0.80 3.26 0.91 3.50 1.44 3.68 1.97 4.33 3.17 4.84 3.72 4.77 3.85 4.45 3.45 3.46 2.02 3.03 1.40
1 in 50 2.98 1.01 3.02 0.83 3.29 0.97 3.53 1.06 3.80 1.65 3.97 2.20 4.64 3.52 5.28 4.18 5.20 4.33 4.89 3.99 3.73 2.29 3.31 1.67
1 in 100 3.15 1.13 3.18 0.93 3.47 1.09 3.73 1.18 4.02 1.81 4.19 2.37 4.9 3.79 5.61 4.53 5.5 4.69 5.21 4.40 3.94 2.49 3.52 1.86
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-G
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 11
2.4 Surface Water
Figure 1.2: Hydrograph of (Station: Gazirhat-SW219, Nabaganga river) Study Area
The availability of surface and ground water was assessed from TR-15 of MPO and FAP 4 reports. Above Table-2.4.2 & Figure-1.2 shows the availability of surface water in the area. Moreover invert level of the regulators in peripheral embankment are quite low (-0.60 mPWD), allowing 0.64 m to 2.27m depth of water during dry season. Water can be made available in the khals through the regulators during each high tide, which can be stored in the khal for dry season irrigation by closing the C/S lift gate.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-G
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 12
2.5 Drainage Rate Analysis (Pre-Monsoon) Table 2.5.1 : Analysis of Drainage Rate CRITERIA: Design Storm : 20-Yr 5-Day storm recorded at the nearest Rainfall Station
Crop Damage : Sub-Project WL during design storm may not inundate more than 5% area
by depth more than 300mm for duration of more than 3 days. ASSUMPTIONS: Infiltration, Evapo-Transpiration and Depression Storage are neglected. INPUT DATA: Drainage Area (Ha.) : 9951.94 Gross Benefited Area (Ha.) : 6966.36 Lowest Ground Level/Drainage Level (mPWD) : 1.25
Allaowable Damaged Area (% of Benefited Area) : : 5.00%
Area-Elevation-Storage Data :
Elevation (m) Cum. Area (Ha.) Cum. Stor.
(Ha-m)
LGL=> 1.25 13.23 8.27
1.50 229.41 38.60
1.75 544.12 135.29
2.00 1091.18 339.70
2.25 1542.65 668.93
2.50 1813.23 1088.42
2.75 2250.00 1596.32
3.00 2602.94 2202.94
3.25 2669.12 2861.95
3.50 2704.41 3533.64
3.75 2752.94 4215.81
4.00 2757.36 4904.59
4.25 2772.06 5595.77
Design Storm Rainfall (mm): Station, Narail - CL 461 Pre - Monsoon
Days 1 2 3 4 5
Cum Depth 233 244 255 271 281
Trial Drainage Rate (mm/day): 63.00
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-G
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 13
Table 2.5.2 : Calculations for Basin Water Level (Pre-Monsoon):
Day Cum RF (mm)
Cum DR (mm)
Cum RO (mm)
Cum. Stor. (Ha-m)
WLbasin (mPWD)
WLdam% (mPWD)
WLdam% +0.3
(mPWD)
Day with WLFull dam
100% Crop Damage (Ha.)
Design Drain. Rate
(mm/day)
1 232.75 63.00 169.75 1689.34 2.79 1.55 1.85 Day-1
2 244.11 126.00 118.11 1175.39 2.54 1.55 1.85 Day-2
3 255.45 189.00 66.45 661.31 2.24 1.55 1.85 Day-3 3.48 63.00
4 271.09 252.00 19.09 189.96 1.82 1.55 1.85 -ve
5 281.10 315.00 -33.90 -337.40 -51.00 1.55 1.85 -ve
1. A day is counted as "day with WL corresponding to full damage of allowable % of Area" if WLbasin > WLdam% +0.3 for the day.
2. If 3 consecutive days are counted to be crop damage days, crops of land corresponding to allowable % area will be considered fully damaged.
3. If count of crop damage day < 3, rivise trial drainage rate downward.
4. If count of crop damage day > 3, rivise trial drainage rate upward.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-G
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 14
2.6 Drainage Rate Analysis ( Monsoon )
Table 2.6.1 : Drainage Rate Analysis
CRITERIA: Design Storm : 20-Yr 5-Day storm recorded at the nearest Rainfall Station
Crop Damage : Sub-Project WL during design storm may not inundate more than 5% area
by depth more than 300mm for duration of more than 3 days.
ASSUMPTIONS: Infiltration, Evapo-Transpiration and Depression Storage are neglected.
INPUT DATA: Drainage Area (Ha.) : 9951.94
Gross Benefited Area (Ha.) : 6966.36
Lowest Ground Level/Drainage Level (mPWD) : 1.25
Allaowable Damaged Area (% of Benefited Area) : : 5.00%
Area-Elevation-Storage Data :
Elevation (m) Cum. Area (Ha.) Cum. Stor. (Ha-m)
LGL=> 1.25 13.23 8.27
1.50 229.41 38.60
1.75 544.12 135.29
2.00 1091.18 339.70
2.25 1542.65 668.93
2.50 1813.23 1088.42
2.75 2250.00 1596.32
3.00 2602.94 2202.94
3.25 2669.12 2861.95
3.50 2704.41 3533.64
3.75 2752.94 4215.81
4.00 2757.36 4904.59
4.25 2772.06 5595.77
Design Storm Rainfall (mm): Station, Narail - CL 461
Monsoon
Days 1 2 3 4 5
Cum Depth 228 245 258 262 264
Trial Drainage Rate (mm/day): 61.00
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-G
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 15
Table 2.6.2 : Calculations for Basin Water Level (Monsoon)
Day Cum RF (mm)
Cum DR (mm)
Cum RO (mm)
Cum. Stor. (Ha-m)
WLbasin (mPWD)
WLdam% (mPWD)
WLdam% +0.3
(mPWD)
Day with WLFull dam
100% Crop Damage
(Ha.)
Design Drain. Rate
(mm/day)
1 228.10 61.00 167.10 1662.94 2.78 1.55 1.85 Day-1
2 244.70 122.00 122.70 1221.13 2.57 1.55 1.85 Day-2
3 258.05 183.00 75.05 746.84 2.30 1.55 1.85 Day-3 3.48 61.00
4 262.16 244.00 18.16 180.72 1.81 1.55 1.85 -ve
5 264.34 305.00 -40.66 -404.64 -61.17 1.55 1.85 -ve
1. A day is counted as "day with WL corresponding to full damage of allowable % of Area" if WLbasin > WLdam% +0.3 for the day.
2. If 3 consecutive days are counted to be crop damage days, crops of land corresponding to allowable % area will be considered fully damaged.
3. If count of crop damage day < 3, rivise trial drainage rate downward.
4. If count of crop damage day > 3, rivise trial drainage rate upward.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-G
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 16
2.7 Structural vent size Analysis The total nos. of vent (for upper and lower catchment of Linar khal) becomes 16 (14+2 & Size 1.52m x 1.82m). The total numbers of vents existing in this part of the Chenchuri Beel Sub-project are 14 meaning that another 2 vents will be constructed.
Table 2.7.1: Sizing of Regulator/Sluice
When Hw > Hv and Htw > Hv , Flow Type I QI = 0.80xNxBwxHvx(2x9.81xh')0.5
When Hw > 1.5Hv and Htw < Hv , Flow Type III QIII = 0.60xNxBvxHvx{2x9.81x(Hw-Hv/2)}0.5
When Hw < 1.5Hv and Htw >2Hv/3 , Flow Type IV
QIV = 0.83xNxBvx(Hw-h')x(2x9.81xh')0.5
When Hw < 1.5Hv and Htw <2Hv/3 , Flow Type V QV = 1.56xNxBvxHw
3/2
Where: Hw = Upstream Water Depth N = Vent Nos.
Htw = Tail Water Depth
h' = Head Difference
Hv = Vent Hieght Q = Flow through Regulator
Bv = Vent Width
Input Data:
N = 16 nos. RWL 2.48 mPWD
BV = 1.52 m Basin WL = 2.78 mPWD
HV = 1.82 m Design
Q = 83.58 m3/Sec (20% addition)
Sill Level = -
0.61 mPWD
RWL HW HTW h' Flow Type Q
(mPWD) (m) (m) (m) m3/Sec
2.48 3.39 3.09 0.30 I 85.91
85.91 OK
Drainage Rate = 63.00 mm/day ( Monsoon )
Catchment Area = 9552 ha-m ( Considering SWC-14+, SWC-16
& SWC-17+18 area )
Discharge = 69.65 cumec
The present functioning of the existing and proposed vant ( 16 nos vent )are satisfactory.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-G
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 17
3 BASIN OR SIP AREA WATER LEVEL 3.1 Findings
The nearest WL station is in the Gazirhat no. SW219, daily water level of Nabaganga river (Tidal river) analysis has been done and found from different return periods 1 in 2 year, 1 in 2.33 year and 1 in 5 year are 3.61m PWD, 3.70m PWD and 4.14m PWD respectively and are presented in Table 2.3.3.This WL will not control directly on SIP WL.. The rainfall of this area directly controls SIP area WL. The nearest rainfall station is in Naril no. R-461, 5-day maximum rainfall depth-duration data ( Pre-Monsoon & Monsoon ) has been done and also compute the basin water depth and drainage modulus during monsoon and found 2.78 mPWD, 61 mm/day respectively and are presented in Table-2.5.1, Table-2.5.2 & Table-3.6.1, Table-3.6.2 . Moreover checked vent size and nos and found satisfactory, shows in Table 2.7.1.Observed water level gauge had been putted in the individual SIP area, structure’s body cut-mark field Survey and depth of water above ground for individual SIP Plus Ground Level have been done and are presented in Table : 3.1.1 Table 3.1.1: Observed Water Level
SL. No.
Name of SIP
Existing Water Level
Based on Gauge reading
Based on survey of depth of water above ground for individual SIP Plus GL
Based on Cut-mark Survey
1 SWC-10+12 (Bagdanga) 3.00 2.85 2.68
2 SWC-13 (Islampur) 2.83 2.84
3 SWC-4~6,8,9+14 ( Diabari ) 2.93 2.89 2.80
4 SWC-15 (Madinar Khal) 2.97 2.93
5 SWC-16 & SWC-17+18 3.13 2.84
6 SWN- 8 (Tularumpur) - 2.81
7 SWN- 9 (Barenda) - 2.83
8 SWN- 16 (Singia) 2.48 2.41
9 SWN 17~19 (Ranagati) 2.41 2.38 2.30
10 SWN- 21 (Jamrildanga) 2.01 2.34
11 SWN- 22 (Peruli) 2.04 2.19 2.50
12 SWN 23~25 ( Ramgati ) 2.35 2.34 2.55
4 RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS Water level before rehabilitation ( Pre-Project ) 2.81 mPWD and after rehabilitation ( Post Project ) 2.51 mPWD have suggested for SIP (SWC-16 & SWC- 17+18) by PMO and consultants ISPMC on 16 January 2011. This WL 2.81 mPWD is justified because observed gauge reading is 3.13 mPWD, depth of water above ground plus Ground Level is 2.84 mPWD and calculated basin water level at monsoon is 2.78 mPwd, those all are nearest to 2.81 mPWD.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-G
SWC-17+18; Noagram-Gazaria Scheme 18
5. BENEFITS OF THE PROPOSED INTERVENTIONS The expected benefits of the proposed interventions have been estimated using the findings of the hydrological analysis in terms of anticipated change in cropping patterns coverage in the study area. The benefit that has been found from the analysis seems to be very significant and encouraging. The anticipated changing land use patterns of SIP SWC-17+18 is given in Table 5.1 and graphically shown in Figure 5.1. It has been seen that F0 and F1 (productive land) land would be increased after proposed rehabilitation condition from 622.24 ha to 844.70 ha and 534.29 ha to 543.36 ha respectively. On the other hand, the F2 and F3 (deeply inundated land) lands will be decreased significantly. Table 5.1: Types of land under different inundation depth
Land Type Existing condition
Area (ha) After proposed rehabilitation
Area(ha) Remarks
F0 (d<0.3m) 622.24 844.70
F1 (0.3m<d<0.9m) 534.29 543.36
F2 (0.9m<d<1.8m) 313.77 82.53
F3 (d>1.8m) 0.29 0.00
0.00
200.00
400.00
600.00
800.00
Area (ha)
Existing condition Area (ha) 622.24 534.29 313.77 0.29
After proposed rehabilitation
Area(ha)
844.70 543.36 82.53 0.00
F0 (d<0.3m)F1
(0.3m<d<0.9m)
F2
(0.9m<d<1.8m)F3 (d>1.8m)
Figure 5.1: Changing land classes expected due to proposed interventions
ANNEX-H
TRAINING
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Training
Introduction:
The concept of Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project
(SAIWRPMP) is a new idea totally based on participation of beneficiaries / stakeholders in all phases
of planning, design, implementation and operation & maintenance cycle of the project. Moreover the
concept includes transfer of management to the stakeholders after completion of the rehabilitation
works of the project.
Plan
Training components have been incorporated for capacity development of the a) Officers of PMO,
SMOs, Line Agencies and the NGO Supervisor & Facilitators (Staff training) and b) Members of the
WMOs (WMO training) of Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management
Project (SAIWRPMP). In this process a total of 389 Nos. of training programs have been planned to
implement during 2009-2010, 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13 to train up the officers of PMO / SMOs,
District / Upazilla level officers of line agencies, Facilitators of NGO (ASG), WMG members and other
beneficiaries of the project. Staff training – 42 & WMO training –347. Detailed Training plan
annexed in Tables.
Achievement
A total of 117 trainings have so far been imparted on (a) Drafting of Bylaw for WMG (b) Registration
procedures for WMG. ,(c) Procedure of Book Keeping for WMG, (d) Operation and Maintenance of
infrastructure through participatory water management , (e) Plantation Activities and Vegetable
Gardening in SAIWRPMP , (f) Cultivation Procedure of different crops and Vegetables gardening , (g)
Seed Production & Compost Preparation, (h) Poultry, Cow and Goat Rearing for Collective Action
Plan (CAP) in SAIWRPMP, (i) Meaning and Functions of WMG/ WMA/JMC in SAIWRPMP, (j) Basic
training on Carp poly-culture in SAIWRPMP area, (k) Basic training on GIFT (Tilapia) culture in
SAIWRPMP area, (l) Field Training and sharing experiences of High value crop production, (m)
Field Training and sharing experiences of CAP, (o) LCS Training For WMG members , (p) Gender
awareness for the WMG members,(q) Salinity of surface water and its safe use, (r) Multi disciplinary
delineation, planning and implementation of a sub-unit of SAIWRPM, (s) On-Job training on
delineation, planning and other related matters for implementation of a sub-unit of SAIWRPMP, (t)
Orientation Workshop of the newly recruited Facilitators and others, (u) Induction course on
preparation of SIP and formation of WMO , (u) Hydrography, Topography Survey & Data processing
by GIS, (v) Communication Tools and Techniques, (w) Workshop on “Participatory Action Plan for
Preparation of SIP and Formation of WMO, (x) Feedback training on “Participatory Action Plan for
Preparation of SIP and Formation of WMO, (y) Formation of WMO and Laws of Cooperative and (z)
Workshop on Micro Credit Management of SAIWRPMP etc. The rest 272 training courses will be
imparted during the next two and a half year.
Besides the above training there are some Foreign trainings and lots of Demonstrations on Fisheries
and Agriculture area.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Southwest Area Integrated water Resources planning and Management Project
Implemented Training Activities during 2009-2010 Staff Training (2009-10) Part-A
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
01/2009
-10
Formation of WMO,
Rules of
cooperatives,
Formation procedure
and activities of LCS.
Zilla
Parishad
Auditorium
, Narail
2 days
(8-9
Sept,09)
NGO Supervisor,
Facilitators &
Extension
Overseers of
BWDB
17(Male-13,
Female-4)
34 18,840.00 TL of ISPMC ,
WMA Specialist of ISPMC
District Co-Operative Officer, Narail and
EE,DP-3, (IPSWAM) BWDB, Dhaka
02/2009
-10
Formation of WMO,
Rules of co-
operatives,
Formation procedure
and activities of LCS.
Zilla
Parishad
Auditorium
, Narail
2 days (14 -
15 Sept,09)
Officers of PMO
& SMOs and
ED,NGO(ASG)
12( Male-12,
Female-0)
24 18,940.00 TL of ISPMC ,
WMO Specialist of ISPMC
District Co-Operative Officer, Narail and
EE,DP-3, (IPSWAM) BWDB, Dhaka
05/2009
-10
Basic Fisheries
Extension and Semi
intensive carf
Polyculture.
Zilla
Parishad
Auditorium
, Narail
3 days (03 -
05 Nov.,09)
Officers of
Fisheries
Department,
Officers of PMO ,
Officers of SMO
and NGO
Facilitator(Fish)
13( Male-11,
Female-2)
39 27,250.00 DTL,WMO Specialist and Fisheries Specialist of
ISPMC ,
Deputy Chief(Fishery),Dte of Planning-
3(IPSWAM),BWDB,Dhaka
,District Fisheries Officer, Narail and
Senior Scientific Officer ,BFRI, Jessore.
06/2009
-10
Water Management
of Different Crops,
Green Manuring and
Compost
preparetion"
Zilla
Parishad
Auditorium
, Narail
3 days (09 -
11
Nov.,2009)
Officers of
Department of
Agriculture
Extension,
Officers of PMO,
Officers of SMO
and NGO
Facilitators (Ag.)
13( Male-13,
Female-0)
39 28,200.00 DTL and Agriculture Development Specialist of
ISPMC ,
Deputy Director, DAE, Narail ,
Crop Production Specialist , DAE , Narail and
Plant Protection Specialist,DAE ,Narail.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
12/2009
-10
Guide Lines on
Gender and
Development
Zilla
Parishad
Auditorium
, Narail
3 days(19-21
January,201
0)
Officers of line
agencies,NGO
Supervisor and
NGO Facilitator.
13(Male-8
Female-5)
39 28,450.00 Dr. Rokeya Khatun (ADB),
Mr.A.Kashem (IPSWAM),
Dist. Women Affairs Officer and
Ms. Tajkera Khair (GL Specialist,)
20/2009
-10
Financial
Management for
SAIWRPMP
BWDB
Conferenc
e
room,Motij
heel,Dhak
a
2 days(14-15
March,2010)
Officers of
PMO,SMOs,RAC,
Dte of Finance,
Dte of Accounts
and Dte of Audit.
23(Male-22
Female-1)
46 100,000.00
(Expenditure
made from
consultant’s
budget fund)
Mr.Zahirul Islam(PD,SAIWRPMP)
Mr.R.Roostee(TL,ISPMC)
Mr.Alexandar Fox(Procurement
Specialist,ADB,BRM,Dhaka)
Mr.M.A. Ahad(Head of Disbursement,
ADB,BRM,Dhaka)
Mr.Zakirul Islam,(Director,
Finance,BWDB,Dhaka)
Mr.Rezaul Karim,(Director, Audit,BWDB,Dhaka)
Mr.Ataul Karim(Financial Adviser,ISPMC)
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
30/2009
-10
Participatory
Integrated Water
Resources
Management.
CEGIS
Conferenc
e
Room,Guls
han,Dhaka
4days(14-
17
June,2010)
Officers of PMO,
Officers of SMOs,
NGO Superviser,
NGO Facilitators,
37(Male-29 +
Female-8)
148 666,626.00
(Expenditure
made from
consultant’s
budget fund)
Mr.Giasuddin Ahmed Choudhury, Executive
Director,CEGIS,Dhaka
Prof. Abdul Matin,BUET,Dhaka
Dr.Musfiqus Salehin, Prof.,IWMF, BUET, Dhaka
Mr.Ahmadul Hassan, Director, Research
Development and Training
Division,CEGIS,Dhaka
Mr.Wazi Ullah,Deputy Executive Director
,CEGIS,
Mr.H.S.Mozaddad Faruque, WR Expart,
CEGIS,
Mr.Mujibul Huq, Environmental Advisor, CEGIS,
Mr.Md.A. Rashid, Agriculture Engineer, CEGIS,
Mr.Sultan Ahmed, , Director, Business
Development Division, CEGIS,Dhaka
Dr.Dilruba Ahmed, , Director, Socio-economic
Division, CEGIS,Dhaka
Mr.Ehsan Hafiz Chowdhury, Director, Database
and IT Division, CEGIS,Dhaka
Mr.Mahfuzur Rahman,Executive Engineer,
CDSP,BWDB,Dhaka
Mr.Nityananda Chakravorty, Socio-economic
Advisor, CEGIS,Dhaka
Mr.Maminul Haque Sarker, Deputy Executive
Director(Development), CEGIS,Dhaka
Dr.Sujit Bala, Prof.,IWMF, BUET, Dhaka
Mr.Malik Fida Abdulla Khan, Director, Climate
Change Division, CEGIS,Dhaka
Sub-Total (A)
2009-10
128(male-108,
female-20)
369 888,306.00
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
WMO Training (2009-10)
Part-B
Course No. Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
03/2009-10 Drafting of Bylaw
for WMG
(Batch-1)
Proshika
Auditorium
, Narail
2 days
(13-14
Oct.,09)
WMG Members of
SIP - 8
21( Male-14,
Female-7)
42 23,395.00 TL of ISPMC,
WMO Specialist of ISPMC
District Co-Operative Officer, Narail and
Upazilla Co-Operative Officer, Narail.
04/2009-10 Drafting of Bylaw
for WMG
(Batch-2)
Proshika
Auditorium
, Narail
2 days
(19-20
Oct.,09)
WMG Members of
SIP - 8 &9
27(Male-18,
Female-9)
54 26,055.00 TL of ISPMC,
WMO Specialist of ISPMC
District Co-Operative Officer, Narail and
Upazilla Co-Operative Officer, Narail.
07/2009-10 Registration
Procedure for
WMG Member
(Batch-1)
Proshika
Auditorium
, Narail
2 days (9 -
10 Dec,09)
WMG Members (
Chairman,Vice-
Chairman and
Cashier of SIP - 8
and 9)
24( Male-24+
Female-0)
48 26,000.00 TL&WMO Specialist of ISPMC,
District Co-Operative Officer, Narail and
Upazilla Co-Operative Officer, Narail.
08/2009-10 Registration
Procedure for
WMG Member
(Batch-2)
Proshika
Auditorium
, Narail
2 days (13
- 14
Dec,09)
WMG Members (
Chairman,Vice-
Chairman and
Cashier of SIP - 8
and 9)
24(Male-22
+Female-2) =
48
48 26,000.00 TL&WMO Specialist of ISPMC,
District Co-Operative Officer, Narail and
Upazilla Co-Operative Officer, Narail.
09/2009-10 Plantation
Activities and
Vegetable
Gardening.
(Batch-1)
Proshika
Auditorium
, Narail
2 days (23
- 24
Dec,09)
WMG Agriculture
Committee
Members ( SIP -
8 and 9)
24( Male-15+
Female-9)
48 26,550.00 Agriculture Extention Specialist of ISPMC ,
Upazila Agriculture Officer,Narail
, Upazilla Agriculture Officer, Lohagora,
Agriculture Extension officer ,DAE, Narail
and
Sub- Asstt. Agriculture Officer.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course No. Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
10/2009-10 Operation and
Maintenance of
Infrastructure
through
participatory water
management(Batc
h-1)
Proshika
Auditorium,
Narail
2 days (11-
12 January,
2010)
WMG Members (
O&M sub-committee
SIP - 8 )
21( Male-14+
Female-7)
42 22,900.00 Team Leader, ISPM consultant
Deputy Team Leader, ISPM consultant
Water management specialist , ISPM consultant
,O&M specialist, ISPM consultant and
Quality control specialist of ISPM consultant
11/2009-10 Operation and
Maintenance of
Infrastructure
through
participatory water
management(Batc
h-2)
Proshika
Auditorium,
Narail
2 days (13-
14 January,
2010)
WMG Members (
O&M sub-committee
SIP - 8 and 9)
24(Male-16
+Female-8
48 24,100.00 Team Leader, ISPM consultant
Deputy Team Leader, ISPM consultant
Water management specialist , ISPM consultant
,O&M specialist, ISPM consultant and
Quality control specialist of ISPM consultant
13/2009-10 Plantation
Activities and
Vegetable
Gardening. (Batch-
2)
Proshika
Auditorium,
Narail
2 days (26 -
27 January,
2010)
WMG Agriculture
Committee
Members ( SIP - 8
and 9)
21( Male-12+
Female-9)
42 27,350.00
Agriculture Extension Specialist of ISPMC ,
Upazila Agriculture Officer,Narail
,Upazilla Agriculture Officer, Lohagora,,
Agriculture Extention officer,DAE,Narail and
Sub- Asstt. Agriculture Officer.
14/2009-10 Semi Intensive
carp Polyculture.
(Batch-1)
Proshika
Auditorium,
Narail
2 days (8-9
February,
2010)
WMG Members (
Fisheries sub-
committee SIP - 8 )
24( Male-16+
Female-8)
48 26,650.00 Mr.Md.Abbdul Wadud, District Fisheries
Officer,Narail,
Mr.Enamul Hoque, Upazila Fisheries
Officer,Narail Sador,Narail and
Ms.Hosneara Happy, Upazila Fisheries
Officer,Lohagora,,Narail,
15/2009-10 Semi Intensive
carp Polyculture.
(Batch-2)
Proshika
Auditorium,
Narail
2 days (10-
11
February,
2010)
WMG Members
(Fisheries sub-
committee SIP - 8
and 9)
24(Male-19
+Female-5)
48 26,650.00 Mr.Md.Abbdul Wadud, District Fisheries
Officer,Narail,
Mr.Enamul Hoque, Upazila Fisheries
Officer,Narail Sador,Narail and
Ms.Hosneara Happy, Upazila Fisheries
Officer,Lohagora,,Narail,
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course No. Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
16/2009-10 Seed production
and Compost
preparation.
(Batch-1)
Proshika
Auditorium,
Narail
2 days(22-
23
February,
2010)
WMG Members (
Poor and
Vulnerable women
of the project
beneficiaries SIP -
8 )
24(Male-0
Female-24)
48 26,700.00 Mr.Md.Ruhul Amin, , Upazila Agriculture
Officer,Narail Sador,Narail
,Mr.Mohadev Chandra Sana,Agricuture Extension
Officer,Kalia,Narail and
Mr.Badal Chandra Biswas, SAAO, Tularampur
UP.
17/2009-10 Seed production
and Compost
preparation.
(Batch-2)
Proshika
Auditorium,
Narail
2 days (24 -
25
February,
2010)
WMG Members
(Poor and
Vulnerable women
of the project
beneficiaries SIP –
8 & 9 )
24( Male-0+
Female-24)
48 27,450.00 Mr.Md.Ruhul Amin, , Upazila Agriculture
Officer,Narail Sador,Narail,
Mr. Kingkor Chandra Das, Upazila Agriculture
officer,Kalia,Narail
, Mr.Mohadev Chandra Sana, Agricuture
Extension Officer, Kalia, Narail. And
Mr.Zakir Hossain, SAAO, Korola UP.
18/2009-10 Poultry,Goat and
Cow
rearing(Batch-1)
Proshika
Auditorium,
Narail
2 days (8-9
March,
2010)
WMG Members (
Poor and
Vulnerable women
of the project
beneficiaries SIP -
8 )
24( Male-0+
Female-24)
48 27,650.00
Dr.Ali Akbar Mia(DLO,Narail)
Dr.Pizush Kanti Ghosh(TLO,Narail)
Dr.Sushen Haldar(Veterinary Surgeon, Narail)
19/2009-10 Poultry,Goat and
Cow
rearing(Batch-2)
Proshika
Auditorium,
Narail
2 days (10-
11
March y,
2010)
WMG Members (
Poor and
Vulnerable women
of the project
beneficiaries SIP –
8 & 9 )
24(Male-
0+Female-24)
48 27,650.00 Dr.Ali Akbar Mia(DLO,Narail)
Dr.Pizush Kanti Ghosh(TLO,Narail)
Dr.Sushen Haldar(Veterinary Surgeon, Narail)
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course No. Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
21/2009-10 Book keeping for
WMG
(SIP-8)
Proshika
Auditorium,
Narail and
Field visit
3 days (22 -
24
March,2010
)
Secretary, Cashier
and one signatory
member of the
WMG Executive
Committee.
24( Male- 22 +
Female- 2)
72 38,750.00 District Cooperative Officer, Narail.
Mr.Md.Hassan Mahmood, DAR, Office of the
District Cooperative Officer, Narail
Mr.Biraj Mohon Kundu, Upazila Cooperative
Officer, Narail Sador, Narail.
Mr.Tarikul Islam, Inspector, Office of the District
Cooperative Officer,
Mr.Shah Ahmed Ali Khan,WMA Specialist, ISPMC
22/2009-10 Book keeping for
WMG
(SIP-8&9)
Proshika
Auditorium,
Narail and
Field visit
3 days (29 -
31
March,2010
)
Secretary, Cashier
and one signatory
member of the
WMG Executive
Committee.
24( Male-19 +
Female- 5 )
72 38,750.00 District Cooperative Officer, Narail.
Mr.Md.Hassan Mahmood, DAR, Office of the
District Cooperative Officer, Narail
Mr.Biraj Mohon Kundu, Upazila Cooperative
Officer, Narail Sador, Narail.
Mr.Tarikul Islam, Inspector, Office of the District
Cooperative Officer,
Mr.Shah Ahmed Ali Khan,WMA Specialist, ISPMC
23/2009-10 Gender Awareness
for WMG Members
of NSP SIP -8
Proshika
Auditorium,
Narail
2 days (11-
12
April,2010)
WMG Members of
NSP SIP -8
24( Male-6+
Female-18)
48 25,450.00 Mr.Md.Ataul Hoque,DTL,ISPMC
Mr.Md.Lutfar Rahman, EE/SMO, Narail Sub-
Project,BWDB,Narail.
Mr.Shah Ahmed Ali Khan,WMA Specialist,ISPMC
Mrs. Mousumi Biswas, District Women Affairs
Officer,Narail.
Mr.Uttam Kumar Goldar ,Supervisor,NGO(ASG)
Mr.Bidhan Goldar ,Facilitator,NGO(ASG)
24/2009-10
Gender Awareness
for WMG Members
of NSP SIP -8 & 9
Proshika
Auditorium,
Narail
2 days (20-
21
April,2010)
WMG Members of
NSP SIP -8 & 9
24( Male-6+
Female-18)
48 25,450.00 Mr.Md.Ataul Hoque,DTL,ISPMC
Mr.Md.Lutfar Rahman, EE/SMO, Narail Sub-
Project, BWDB, Narail.
Mr.Shah Ahmed Ali Khan,WMA Specialist,ISPMC
Mrs. Mousumi Biswas, District Women Affairs
Officer, Narail.
Mr.Uttam Kumar Goldar ,Supervisor,NGO(ASG)
Mr.Bidhan Goldar ,Facilitator,NGO(ASG)
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course No. Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
25/2009-10 Salinity of
surface water
and its safe use
Proshika
Auditorium
, Narail
2 days(3 -
4
May,2010)
WMG Members of
NSP SIP -8
(comparatively big
size farmer)
24( Male-24+
Female-0)
48 25,450.00 Mr.Md.Lutfar Rahman, EE/SMO, Narail Sub-
Project, BWDB, Narail.
Mr.Abu Bakar Siddique, Environmental
Specialist,ISPMC
Mr.King Kor Chandra Das, Upazila
Agriculture Officer, Kalia, Narail.
Mr.Raghu Nath Kar,Mr. Upazila Agriculture
Officer,Lohagora,Narail
Mr.Ruhul Amin, Upazila Agriculture Officer,
DAE, Narail Sador,Narail
26/2009-10 Salinity of
surface water
and its safe use
Proshika
Auditorium
, Narail
2 days(5 -
6
May,2010)
WMG Members of
NSP SIP -8 & 9
(comparatively big
size farmer)
24( Male-23+
Female-1)
48 25,450.00 Mr.Dipak Kumar Sarkar, EE/SMO, Chenchuri
Beel Sub-Project, BWDB, Narail.
Mr.Abu Bakar Siddique, Environmental
Specialist,ISPMC
Mr.King Kor Chandra Das, Upazila
Agriculture Officer, Kalia, Narail.
Mr.Raghu Nath Kar,Mr. Upazila Agriculture
Officer,Lohagora,Narail
Mr.Ruhul Amin, Upazila Agriculture Officer,
DAE, Narail Sador,Narail
27/2009-10 Refresher course
on O&M of
infrastructure
through
participatory
water
management
Proshika
Auditorium
, Narail
2 days(19
- 20
May,2010)
WMG members
(Chairman,
Secretary and 3
other members of
each WMG) of
NSP SIP-
9(5WMG).
25( Male-20+
Female-5)
50 24,700.00 Mr.Zahirul Islam,Project Director
,SAIWRPMP,BWDB,Jessore
Mr.M.H.Siddique,Water Resources Planner,
ISPMC.
Mr. Md. Lutfar Rahman, SMO /EE, Narail
Sub-project, BWDB, Narail.
Mr.Manzurul Karim, O&M Specialist , ISPMC
Mr.Abdur Razzaque,EE, Office of the PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr.Ataul Huq,,DTL,ISPMC
Mr. Shah A.A.Khan,WMA Specialist,ISPMC
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course No. Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource person
28/2009-10 Refresher course
on O&M of
infrastructure
through
participatory
water
management
Proshika
Auditorium
, Narail
2 days(23
- 24
May,2010)
WMG members
(Chairman,
Secretary and 3
other members of
each WMG) of
NSP SIP-
8(5WMG).
25(Male-21+
Female-4)
50 24,700.00 Mr.Zahirul Islam, Project Director,
SAIWRPMP, BWDB, Jessore.
Mr.M.H.Siddique, Water Resources Planner,
ISPMC.
Mr. Dipak Kumar Sarkar, SMO /EE,
Chenchuri Beel Sub-project, BWDB, Narail.
Mr.Manzurul Karim, O&M Specialist , ISPMC
Mr.Abdur Razzaque,EE, Office of the PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr.Ataul Huq,,DTL,ISPMC
Mr. Shah A.A.Khan,WMA Specialist,ISPMC
29/2009-10 Refresher course
on O&M of
infrastructure
through
participatory
water
management
Proshika
Auditorium
, Narail
2 days(25
- 26
May,2010)
WMG members
(Chairman,
Secretary and 3
other members of
each WMG) of
NSP SIP-
8(6WMG).
30( Male-24+
Female-6)
60 27,100.00 Mr.Zahirul Islam,Project Director
,SAIWRPMP,BWDB,Jessore
Mr.M.H.Siddique, Water Resources Planner,
ISPMC.
Mr. Md. Lutfar Rahman, SMO /EE, Narail
Sub-project, BWDB, Narail.
Mr.Manzurul Karim, O&M Specialist , ISPMC
Mr.Fakrul Abedin,EE, Office of the PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr.Ataul Huq,,DTL,ISPMC
Mr. Shah A.A.Khan,WMA Specialist,ISPMC
Sub-total(B) 554(Male-335,
Female-219)
1156 620,900.00
Grant
Total(A+B)
For 2009-10
682(Male-
443+ Female-
239)
1525 1509,206.00
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Southwest Area Integrated water Resources planning and Management Project Implemented Training Activities during 2010-2011
Part-A (Staff Training) 2010-11
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
01/
2010-11
Multi disciplinary
delineation, planning
and implementation of
a sub-unit of
SAIWRPMP
CEGIS conference
room,Gulshan,
Dhaka.
4 days (2-5
August,2010)
Officers of PMO,
SMOs and NGO
(ASG).
29( Male-27
Female-02)
116 666,000.00
(Expenditure
incurred from
consultant’s
training fund)
Mr.Giasuddin Ahmed Choudhury, Executive Director,CEGIS,Dhaka
Prof. Abdul Matin,BUET,Dhaka
Mr.Wazi Ullah,Deputy Executive Director(Operation),CEGIS , Dhaka
Mr.H.S.Mozaddad Faruque, WR Expart, CEGIS,Dhaka
Mr.Mujibul Huq, Environmental Advisor, CEGIS,Dhaka
Mr.Nityananda Chakravorty, Socio-economic Advisor, CEGIS, Dhaka
Mr.Ataul Huq and Mr.M.H.Siddiquee,ISPMC
02/
2010-11
On-Job training on
delineation, planning
and other related
matters for
implementation of a
sub-unit of
SAIWRPMP
BACHTE
SHEKHA
Conference room,
Arabpur, Jessore.
3 days ( 1-3
September,2010)
Officers of PMO,
SMOs and NGO
(ASG).
30( Male-30
Female-00)
90 60,000.00
(Expenditure
incurred from
consultant’s
training fund)
Mr.Zahirul Islam, Project Director,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Masud Karim,DCEO, PMO
Mr.Mahbubar Rahman,EE, PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), SAIWRPMP
Mr.R.F.Roostee,TL,ISPMC
Mr.Ataul Huq , ISPMC
Mr.M.H.Siddiquee,ISPMC
Mr.Shah Ahammed Ali Khan, ISPMC
Mr.Monzurul Karim,ISPMC
Dr.Rezaul Karim,ISPMC
Dr.Shamsul Huda,ISPMC
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
03/
2010-11
Hydrography,
Topography Survey &
Data processing by
GIS.
BWDB Rest
House,
Narail
4 days ( 21-24
October,2010)
SDEs, AE and SAE
of PMO/SMO .
07( Male-07
Female-00)
28 27,500.00
Mr.Md.Fakrul Abedin, Executive Engineer, Office of the PMO, SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Amirul Islam, Executive Engineer, Office of the Chief Monitoring, BWDB, Dhaka.
04/
2010-11
Communication Tools
and Techniques.
BACHTE
SHEKHA
Auditorium,
Arabpur, Jessore
3 days(30.10.10
to 01.11.10)
Officers of PMO,
Extension Overseers
and Facilitators
35(Male-28
Female-07)
105 5,88,000.00
(Expenditure
incurred from
consultant’s
training fund)
Mr.Zahirul Islam, Project Director, SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Masud Karim,,DCEO, PMO
Mr.Giasuddin Ahmed Choudhury, Executive Director, CEGIS,Dhaka.
Mr.Md. Wazi Ullah,,Deputy Executive Director (Operation), CEGIS , Dhaka.
Dr. Hamidul Hoque,…., Institute of Livelihood Studies,Dhaka.
Dr.M.A.Matin, Professor, BUET, Dhaka.
Dr.Md. Rezaul Karim,AE Specialist,ISPMC,SAIWRPMP
05/
2010-11
Orientation Workshop
of the newly recruited
Facilitators and others
BACHTE
SHEKHA
Auditorium,
Arabpur, Jessore
1day(03.11.10) Newly recruited
Facilitators and
others
51(Male-44
Female-7)
51 16,000.00
(Expenditure
incurred from
consultant’s
training fund)
Mr.Zahirul Islam, Project Director, SAIWRPMP
Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, SAIWRPMP
Mr.Mahbubar Rahman,EE, PMO .
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), SAIWRPMP
Mr.R.F.Roostee,TL,ISPMC
Mr.Ataul Huq , DTL,ISPMC
Mr.Shah Ahammed Ali Khan, ISPMC
Mr.Monzurul Karim,ISPMC
Dr.Shamsul Huda,ISPMC
Dr.Md. Rezaul Karim,ISPMC
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
06/
2010-11
Induction course on
preparation of SIP and
formation of WMO
BACHTE
SHEKHA
Auditorium,
Arabpur, Jessore
3days
(10-12Nov.10)
Newly recruited
Facilitators and
others
35(Male-30
Female-5)
105 98,480.00 Mr.Md.Abdur Razzque,EE, PMO
Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, PMO
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr.Mahbubar Rahman,EE, PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), PMO
Mr.Md.Hafizur Rahman,EO, PMO
Mr.Md.Lutfor
Rahman,EE/SMO,Narail
Mr.Hasan Mahmood,DAR,Office of
the Dist.Cooperative Officer,Narail
Upazila Cooperative officer, Kalia,
Narail
Mr.Shah Ahammed Ali Khan,
ISPMC
Mr.Monzurul Karim,ISPMC
Dr.Shamsul Huda,ISPMC
Dr.Md. Rezaul Karim,ISPMC
Mr.Md.Aminul Karim,PMO
07/
2010-11
Orientation Workshop
of the newly recruited
Facilitators of
NGO(ASG) and others
Proshika
Auditorium, Narail
1day(22.11.10) Newly recruited
Facilitators of
NGO(ASG) and
others
15(Male-12
Female-3)
15 - Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, PMO
Mr.Md.Abdur Razzaque,EE, PMO
Mr.Masud Karim,
DCEO,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Hafizur Rahman,EO, PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F),
SAIWRPMP
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
08/
2010-11
Induction course on
preparation of SIP and
formation of WMO
Proshika
Auditorium, Narail
2days (25 and
27 Nov.10)
Newly recruited
Facilitators of NGO
and others
15(Male-12
Female-3)
30 41,050.00 Mr.Md.Abdur Razzque,, EE, PMO
Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, PMO
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), PMO
Mr.Md.Hafizur Rahman,EO, PMO
Mr.Biddut Kumar Shaha, EE/
SMO,Chenchury Beell Sub-project,
Mr.Hasan Mahmood,DAD,Office of
the Dist.Cooperative Officer,Narail
Mr.R.F.Roostee,TL,ISPMC
Mr.Ataul Haq,DTL,ISPMC
Mr.Shah Ahammed Ali Khan,
ISPMC
Mr.Monzurul Karim,ISPMC
Dr.Shamsul Huda,ISPMC
Dr.Md. Rezaul Karim,ISPMC
Mr.Md.Aminul Karim,ISPMC
09/
2010-11
Workshop on
Participatory Action
Plan
BANCHTE
SHEKHA
Auditorium,
Arabpur, Jessore
3days
(28 + 29 Nov. +
01 Dec..,10)
Officers of PMO and
Newly recruited
Facilitators and
others of PMO and
NGO
85(Male-68
Female-17)
255 200,000.00
(Expenditure
incurred from
consultant’s
training fund)
Mr.Md.Abdur Razzque,EE, PMO
Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, PMO
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), PMO
Mr.Md.Hafizur Rahman,EO, PMO
Mr.R.F.Roostee,TL,ISPMC
Mr.Ataul Haq,DTL,ISPMC
Mr.Shah Ahammed Ali Khan, ISPMC
Mr.Monzurul Karim,ISPMC
Dr.Shamsul Huda,ISPMC
Dr.Md. Rezaul Karim,ISPMC
Dr.C.M.Wijayaratna, Int.WMA Specialist
Mr.Abu Bakor Siddique
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
16/
2010-11
Feedback training on
“Participatory Action
Plan for Preparation of
SIP and Formation of
WMO”
Bachte Shekha
Auditorium,
Arabpur, Jessore
2days (23&25
December,
2010.)
Facilitators and
others of PMO and
NGO
84(Male-66
Female-18)
168 1,34,850.00 Mr.Md.Abdur Razzque,EE, PMO
Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, PMO
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), PMO
Mr.R.F.Roostee,TL,ISPMC
Mr.Ataul Haq,DTL,ISPMC
Mr.Shah Ahammed Ali Khan, ISPMC
Dr.Shamsul Huda,ISPMC
Dr.Md. Rezaul Karim,ISPMC
23/
2010-11
2nd Feedback training
on “Preparation of SIP
and Formation of
WMO”
Zila Parisad
Auditorium, Narail.
1day
(15.01.2011)
Officers of
PMO,Facilitators of
PMO and NGO
94(Male-77
Female-17)
94 74,650.00 Mr.Zahirul Islam,PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Fakhrul Abedin, EE, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Didarul Islam, IWM.
Mr.R.F.Roostee,TL,ISPMC
58/
2010-11
Formation of WMO
and Laws of
Cooperative
Banchte Shekha
Auditorium,
Arabpur, Jessore
2 days
(04-05 May,
2011)
Officers of
PMO,Facilitators of
PMO and NGO
51( Male-42
Female-9)
102 91,750.00 Mr. Shah Ahmed Ali Khan, WMA. Specialist, ISPMC
Mr. Samir Kumar Biswas, Joint Registrar of Cooperatives, Khulna
Mr.Md.Jahangir Alam,Dist. Cooperative Officer,Narail
Ms. Pronati Bisnu, Dist.Cooperative Officer, Jessore
Mr. Mobarak Ali Talukdar, Cooperative Specialist, ISPMC
59/
2010-11
Formation of WMO
and Laws of
Cooperative
Banchte Shekha
Auditorium,
Arabpur, Jessore
2 days
(08-09 May,
2011)
Officers of
PMO,Facilitators of
PMO and NGO
51( Male-42
Female-9)
102 91,750.00 Mr. Shah Ahmed Ali Khan, WMA. Specialist, ISPMC
Mr. Samir Kumar Biswas, Joint Registrar of Cooperatives, Khulna
Mr.Md.Jahangir Alam,Dist. Cooperative Officer,Narail
Ms. Pronati Bisnu, Dist.Cooperative Officer, Jessore
Mr. Mobarak Ali Talukdar, Cooperative Specialist, ISPMC
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
86/2010-
11
Workshop on Micro
Credit Management of
SAIWRPMP
Banchte Shekha
Auditorium,
Arabpur, Jessore
1 day
(30 June,2011)
Officers of PMO,
RA,SF,CF and
WMCA president
72( Male-70
Female-2)
72 58,750.00 Mr.Mobarak Ali Talukdar, Cooperative Specialist, ISPMC
Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCO,Narail
Ms. Pronoti Bisnu, DCO,Jessore
Total(Staff
Training) Part –
A(2010-11)
Total Course = 14 654( Male
555+
Female-99)
1333 2148,780.00
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Part-B (WMO Training) (2010-11)
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
10/
2010-11 Drafting of Bylaw
for WMG
Union parisad
auditorium,
Purulia U.P.
3days(07-09
Dec.,2010)
WMG Members of
(CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG
# 16/1, 16/2, 16/3, 16/4
and 16/5
31(Male-21
Female-10)
93 97,150.00 Mr.Jahangir Islam, DCA, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Hafizur Rahman,EO, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Jahangir Alam, Dist. Cooperative Officer, Narail.
Mr.Hasan Mahmood,DAD,Office of the Dist.Cooperative Officer,Narail
Mr.Md.Mudasser Hossain, Upazila Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail.
Mr.R.F.Roostee,TL,ISPMC
Mr.Shah Ahammed Ali Khan, ISPMC
11/
2010-11 Cultivation
Procedure of
different crops and
Vegetables
gardening
Union parisad
auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
U.P.
3days(07-09
Dec.,2010)
WMG Members of
(CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG
# 16/1, 16/2, 16/3, 16/4
and 16/5
31(Male-20
Female-11)
93 98,200.00 Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Deputy Director, DAE, Narail.
Mr.King Kor Chandra Das, Upazila Agriculture Officer, Kalia, Narail.
Upazila Agriculture Officer, Narail.
SAAO (BS), Purulia Block, Kalia, Narail.
Mr.Ataul Haq,DTL,ISPMC
Dr.Rezaul Karim, ISPMC
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
13/
2010-11 Cultivation
Procedure of
different crops and
Vegetables
gardening.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
U.P.
3days(14+15+17
Dec.,2010)
WMG Members of
(CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG
# 16/6, 18/2, 18/3, 18/4
and 18/5
30(Male-19
Female-11)
90 98,200.00 Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, PMO SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), PMO
Deputy Director, DAE, Narail.
Mr.King Kor Chandra Das, Upazila Agriculture Officer, Kalia, Narail.
Upazila Agriculture Officer, Narail.
SAAO (BS), Purulia Block, Kalia, Narail.
14//
2010-11 Drafting of Bylaw
for WMG
Union parisad
auditorium,
Purulia U.P.
3days(20-22
Dec.,2010)
WMG Members of
(CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG
# 18/5A, 18/6, 18/6A,
18/7 and 18/8
30(Male-20
Female-10)
90 97,150.00 Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Hafizur Rahman,EO, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Jahangir Alam, Dist.Cooperative Officer, Narail.
Mr.Hasan Mahmood,DAD,Office of the Dist.Cooperative Officer,Narail
Mr.Md.Mudasser Hossain, Upazila Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail.
15/
2010-11 Cultivation
Procedure of
different crops and
Vegetables
gardening.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
U.P.
3days(20-22
Dec.,2010)
WMG Members of
CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG
# 18/5A, 18/6, 18/6A,
18/7 and 18/8
30(Male-20
Female-10)
90 98,200.00 Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, PMO
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), PMO
Deputy Director, DAE, Narail.
Mr.King Kor Chandra Das, Upazila Agriculture Officer, Kalia, Narail.
Upazila Agriculture Officer, Narail.
SAAO (BS), Purulia Block, Kalia, Narail.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
17/
2010-11
Registration
procedures for
WMG.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Purulia U.P
3 days (28-30
December,
2010.)
WMG members of
CSP/SIP: 16-18
WMG#16/1, 16/2, 16/3,
16/4 and16/5.
30(Male-19
Female-11)
90 96,100.00 Mr.Md.Abdur Razzque,EE, ,PMO
Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, PMO
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), PMO
Mr.Jahangir Alam, Dist.Cooperative Officer, Narail.
Mr.Hasan Mahmood,DAD,Office of the Dist.Cooperative Officer,Narail
Mr.Md.Musaddek Hossain, Upazila Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail.
Mr.Parimal Kumar Das,Assitant Inspector,Upazila Cooperative office ,Narail
18/
2010-11
Basic training on
Carp poly-culture in
SAIWRPMP area.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
U.P.
3 days (28-30
December,
2010.)
WMG members of
CSP/SIP:16-18
(Fishery Sub-
committee) of WMG #
18/5A, 18/6,
18/6A,18/7 and18/8
30(Male-20
Female-10)
90 96,850.00 Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, ,PMO
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), PMO
, Dist.Fisheries Officer, Narail.
Mr.S.M.Enamul Hoque,Sr.Fisheries Officer,Narail
Ms. Hosne Ara Happy, Upazila Fisheries Officer,Lohagora, Narail.
Mr.Md.Azizul Hoque,Assitant Fisheries Officer,KaliaNarail
Dr.Shamsul Huda,ISPMC
19/
2010-11
Registration
procedures for
WMG.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Purulia U.P
3 days (04-06
January, 2011.)
WMG members of
CSP/SIP: 16-18
WMG#16/6, 18/2, 18/3,
18/4 and18/5.
30(Male-20
Female-10)
90 96,100.00 Mr.Md.Abdur Razzque,EE, ,PMO
Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, PMO
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(S), PMO
Mr.Jahangir Alam, Dist.Cooperative Officer, Narail.
Mr.Hasan Mahmood,DAR,Office of the Dist.Cooperative Officer,Narail
Mr.Md.Musaddek Hossain, Upazila Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail.
Mr.Parimal Kumar Das,Assitant Inspector,Upazila Cooperative office ,Narail
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
20/
2010-11
Basic training on
Carp poly-culture in
SAIWRPMP area.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
U.P.
3 days (04-06
January, 2011.)
WMG members of
CSP/SIP: 16-18
(Fishery Sub-
committee) of WMG #
16/1, 16/2, 16/3, 16/4
and16/5.
30(Male-18
Female-12)
90 96,850.00 Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, ,PMO
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(S), PMO
, Dist.Fisheries Officer, Narail.
Mr.S.M.Enamul Hoque,Sr.Fisheries Officer,Narail
Ms..Hosne Ara Happy, Upazila Fisheries Officer,Lohagora, Narail.
Mr.Md.Azizul Hoque,Assitant Fisheries Officer,KaliaNarail
21/
2010-11
Registration
procedures for
WMG.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Purulia U.P
3 days (11-13
January, 2011.)
WMG members of
CSP/SIP: 16-18
WMG#18/5A, 18/6,
18/6A,18/7 and18/8
30(Male-20
Female-10)
90 96,100.00 Mr.Md.Abdur Razzque,EE, ,PMO
Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, PMO Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(S), PMO Mr.Jahangir Alam, Dist.Cooperative Officer, Narail.
Mr.Hasan Mahmood,DAD,Office of the Dist.Cooperative Officer,Narail
Mr.Md.Musaddek Hossain, Upazila Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail.
Mr.Parimal Kumar Das,Assitant Inspector,Upazila Cooperative office ,Narail
22/
2010-11
Basic training on
Carp poly-culture in
SAIWRPMP area.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
U.P.
3 days (11-13
January, 2011.)
WMG members of
CSP/SIP:16-18
(Fishery Sub-
committee) of WMG #
16/6, 18/2, 18/3, 18/4
and18/5.
30(Male-20
Female-10)
90 96,850.00 Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, , PMO
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(S), PMO
Mr.S.M.Enamul Hoque,Sr.Fisheries Officer,Narail
Ms.Hosne Ara Happy, Upazila Fisheries Officer, Lohagora, Narail.
Mr.Md.Azizul Hoque,Assitant Fisheries Officer,KaliaNarail
Dr.Shamsul Huda,ISPMC
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
24/
2010-11
Procedure of Book
Keeping for WMG
Union parisad
auditorium,
Purulia U.P
3 days (19-21
January, 2011.)
WMG members of
CSP/SIP: 16-18 WMG
# 16/1, 16/2, 16/3, 16/4
and16/5.
30(Male-23
Female-7)
90 95,600.00 Mr.Md.Abdur Razzaque, EE, PMO,
Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, , PMO
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(S), PMO
Mr.Jahangir Alam, Dist.Cooperative Officer, Narail.
Mr.Hasan Mahmood,DAD,Office of the Dist.Cooperative Officer,Narail
Mr.Md.Musaddek Hossain, Upazila Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail.
Mr.Parimal Kumar Das,Assitant Inspector,Upazila Cooperative office ,Narail
25/
2010-11
Seed Production &
Compost
Preparation.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
U.P.
3 days (19-21
January, 2011.)
WMG members of
CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG
# 16/2, 16/3, 16/4,
18/2, and 18/3
30(Male-10
Female-20)
90 97,750.00 Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, PMO
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman, EE, PMO,
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(S), PMO
Deputy Director, DAE, Narail.
Mr.King Kor Chandra Das, Upazila Agriculture Officer, Kalia, Narail.
Upazila Agriculture Officer, Narail.
SAAO (BS), Kalia, Narail.
26/
2010-11
Procedure of Book
Keeping for WMG
Union parisad
auditorium,
Purulia U.P
3 days (23-25
January, 2011.)
WMG members of
CSP/SIP: 16-18 WMG
# 16/6, 18/2, 18/3, 18/4
and18/5.
32(Male-29
Female-3)
96 97,700.00 Mr.Md.Abdur Razzaque, EE, PMO,
Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, PMO
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(S), PMO
Mr.Jahangir Alam, Dist.Cooperative Officer, Narail.
Mr.Hasan Mahmood,DAD,Office of the Dist.Cooperative Officer,Narail
Mr.Md.Musaddek Hossain, Upazila Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail.
Mr.Parimal Kumar Das,Assitant Inspector,Upazila Cooperative office ,Narail
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
27/
2010-11
Seed Production &
Compost
Preparation.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
U.P.
3 days (23-25
January, 2011.)
WMG members of
CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG
# 18/4,18/5,18/8,18/6
and 18/7
30(Male-17
Female-13)
90 97,750.00 Mr.Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO.
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO.
Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman, EE, PMO.
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(S), PMO
Deputy Director, DAE, Narail.
Mr.King Kor Chandra Das, Upazila Agriculture Officer, Kalia, Narail.
Upazila Agriculture Officer, Narail.
SAAO (BS), Kalia, Narail.
28/
2010-11
Procedure of Book
Keeping for WMG
Union parisad
auditorium,
Purulia U.P
3 days (29-31
January, 2011.)
WMG members of
CSP/SIP: 16-18 WMG
# 18/5A, 18/6, 18/7 and
18/8.
28(Male-20
Female-8)
84 93,500.00 Mr.Md.Abdur Razzaque, EE, PMO.
Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, , PMO
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(S), PMO .
Mr.Jahangir Alam, Dist.Cooperative Officer, Narail.
Mr.Hasan Mahmood,DAD,Office of the Dist.Cooperative Officer,Narail
Mr.Md.Musaddek Hossain, Upazila Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail.
Mr.Parimal Kumar Das,Assitant Inspector,Upazila Cooperative office ,Narail
29/
2010-11
Seed Production &
Compost
Preparation.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
U.P.
3 days (29-31
January, 2011.)
WMG members of
CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG
# 16/1, 16/5,16/6 and
18/5A
30(Male-2
Female-28)
90 97,750.00 Mr.Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO.
Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman, EE, PMO.
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(S), PMO
Deputy Director, DAE, Narail.
Mr.King Kor Chandra Das, Upazila Agriculture Officer, Kalia, Narail.
Upazila Agriculture Officer, Narail.
SAAO (BS), Kalia, Narail.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
30/
2010-11
LCS Training For
WMG members.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Purulia U.P
1 day (14.02
2011.)
WMG members of
CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG
# 18/5,16/4, 16/3, 16/6
and 16/5
45(Male-34
Female-11)
45 37,150.00 Mr.Shah Ahmed Ali Khan, ISPMC.
Mr. .Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO,
Mr.Md. Abdur Razzaque, EE, PMO.
Mr. Biddut Kumar Shaha, EE/SMO, CSP, SAIWRPMP
Mr. Hasan Mahmud, SDE, Chnchuri Beel Sub-project, SAIWRPMP.
31/
2010-11
LCS Training For
WMG members.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
U.P.
1 day (14.02
2011.)
WMG members of
CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG
# 18/7, 18/2, 18/3, 16/2
and 18/4
40(Male-33
Female-7)
40 34,400.00
Mr.Shah Ahmed Ali Khan, ISPMC,
Mr.Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO,
Mr.Md. Abdur Razzaque, EE, PMO,
Mr. Zulfikar Ali Hawlader, EE, Narail Sub-project, SAIWRPMP
Mr. Amrito Kumar Das, SDE, Narail Sub-project, SAIWRPMP.
32/
2010-11
LCS Training For
WMG members.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Purulia U.P
1 day (15.02
2011.)
WMG members of
CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG
# 18/4, 18/8, 18/6, 16/1
and 18/5A
42(Male-33
Female-9)
42 36,100.00 Mr.Shah Ahmed Ali Khan, ISPMC,
Mr. .Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO,
Mr.Md. Abdur Razzaque, EE, PMO,
Mr. Biddut Kumar Shaha, EE/SMO, CSP,SAIWRPMP
Mr. Hasan Mahmud, SDE, Chnchuri Beel Sub-project, SAIWRPMP.
33/
2010-11
LCS Training For
WMG members.
Zila parisad
auditorium,
Narail
1 day (15.02
2011.)
WMG members of
NSP/SIP:8 & 9) WMG
#
8/1, 8/1A, 8/2, 8/3, 8/4,
8/5, 8/6, 8/7, 8//, 8/9,
8/10, 9/1, 9/2, 9/3, 9/4
and 9/5
42(Male-27
Female-15)
42 36,100.00 Mr.Shah Ahmed Ali Khan, ISPMC
Mr.Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO
Mr.Md. Abdur Razzaque, EE, PMO,
Mr. Zulfikar Ali Hawlader, EE, Narail Sub-project, SAIWRPMP
Mr. Amrito Kumar Das, SDE, Narail Sub-project, SAIWRPMP.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
34/
2010-11
Drafting of Bylaw
for WMG
Union parisad
auditorium,
Singa-Soalpur
U.P., Narail.
3days(22-24
February, 2011)
WMG Members of (SW
NSP/SIP:16 and 21)
6WMG
36(Male-23
Female-13)
108 100,400.00 Mr.Md.Abdur Razzaque, EE, PMO.
Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, PMO.
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(S), PMO
Mr.Md.Hafizur Rahman,EO, PMO
Mr.Md.Jahangir Alam,Dist. Cooperative Officer,Narail
Mr.Hashan Mahmood, DAD, Office of the Dist.Cooperative Officer, Narail.
Upazila Cooperative Officer, Narail Sador, Narail.
Inspector of Cooperative, Narail Sador, Narail
Mr.Shah Ahammed Ali Khan, ISPMC
35/
2010-11
Cultivation
Procedure of
different crops and
Vegetables
gardening.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Singa-Soalpur
U.P., Narail.
3days(22-24
February, 2011)
WMG Members of (SW
NSP/SIP:16 and 21)
6WMG
36(Male-23
Female-13)
108 100,100.00 Deputy Director,DAE,Narail
Upazila Agriculture officer, Narail Sador, Narail.
Mr.Jahangir Islam, DCA, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(Sociology), PMO
Dr.Rezaul Karim, ISPMC
Mr. Provat Kumar Tarafdar,SAAO (BS), Narail Sador , Narail.
Mr.Badal Kumar Das,SAAO (BS), Narail Sador , Narail
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
36/
2010-11
Registration
Procedures for
WMG
Union parisad
auditorium,
Singa-Soalpur
U.P., Narail.
3days(26-28
February, 2011)
WMG Members of (SW
NSP/SIP:16 and 21)
6WMG
36(Male-26
Female-10)
108 100,400.00 Mr.Md.Abdur Razzaque,EE,Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Jahangir Islam, DCA, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(Sociology), Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Hafizur Rahman,EO, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Jahangir Alam,Dist. Cooperative Officer,Narail
Mr.Hashan Mahmood, DAR, Office of the Dist.Cooperative Officer, Narail.
Upazila Cooperative Officer, Narail Sador, Narail.
Inspector of Cooperative, Narail Sador, Narail
Mr.Shah Ahammed Ali Khan, ISPMC
37/
2010-11
Basic training on
Carp poly-culture in
SAIWRPMP area.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Singa-Soalpur
U.P., Narail.
3days(26-28
February, 2011)
WMG Members of (SW
NSP/SIP:16 and 21)
6WMG
36(Male-27
Female-9)
108 100,350.00 Mr. Md. Lutfor Rahman, EE, PMO, SAIWRPMP.
District Fisheries Officer,Narail
Mr. S.M. Enamul Hoque, Senior Fisheries Officer, Narail.
Ms. Hosneara Happy, Upazila Fisheries Officer, Lohagora, Narail.
Asstt. Fisheries Officer, Narail Sador, Narail.
Mr.Jahangir Islam, DCA, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(Sociology), Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Dr. Shamsul Huda, ISPMC
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
38/
2010-11
Procedure of Book
Keeping for WMG
Union parisad
auditorium,
Singa-Soalpur
U.P
3 days (7-9
March, 2011.)
WMG members of
NSP/SIP: 16 and 21
(6 WMG).
36(Male-22
Female-14)
108 100,500.00 Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, ,PMO PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), PMO
Mr.Jahangir Alam, Dist.Cooperative Officer, Narail.
Mr.Hasan Mahmood,DAD,Office of the Dist.Cooperative Officer,Narail
Mr.Md.Golam Rasul, Upazila Cooperative Officer, Narail.
Inspector of Cooperative, Cooperative office ,Narail
39/
2010-11
Seed Production &
Compost
Preparation.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Singa-Soalpur
U.P.
3 days (7-9
March, 2011.)
WMG members of
NSP/SIP: 16 and 21
(6 WMG).
36(Male-23
Female-13)
108 100,350.00 Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman, EE, PMO, SAIWRPMP.
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), PMO
Deputy Director, DAE, Narail.
Upazila Agriculture Officer, Narail.
SAAO (BS), Narail.
40/
2010-11 Drafting of Bylaw
for WMG
Union parisad
auditorium,
Purulia U.P.,
Kalia, Narail.
3days(15-17
March,2011)
WMG Members of
(CSP/SIP:13 and 15)
WMG # 15/3,
15/4,15/5,15/6 and
15/7
30(Male-20
Female-10)
90 95,600.00 Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA,
PMO,SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Lutfor Rahman, EE, PMO
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), PMO
Mr.Md.Hafizur Rahman,EO, PMO
Mr.Jahangir Alam, Dist.Cooperative
Officer, Narail.
Mr.Hasan Mahmood,DAR,Office of the
Dist.Cooperative Officer,Narail
Mr.Md.Mossaddek Hossain, Upazila
Cooperative Officer, Narail.
Mr.M.A. Talukdar,ISPMC
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
41/
2010-11
Basic training on
Carp poly-culture in
SAIWRPMP area.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
U.P., Kalia,
Narail.
3days(15-17
March,2011)
WMG Members of
(CSP/SIP:13 and 15)
WMG # 15/3,
15/4,15/5,15/6 and
15/7
31(Male-22
Female-9
93 98,250.00 Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, ,Office of the
PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, Office of
the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Amimul Ehsan,Asstt.Chief(Fish),
Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), Office of the
PD,SAIWRPMP
, Dist.Fisheries Officer, Narail.
Mr.S.M.Enamul Hoque,Sr.Fisheries
Officer,Narail
Ms..Hosne Ara Happy, Upazila
Fisheries Officer,Lohagora, Narail.
Mr.Md.Azizul Hoque,Assitant Fisheries
Officer,KaliaNarail
Dr.Shamsul Huda,ISPMC
42/
2010-11 Drafting of Bylaw
for WMG
Union parisad
auditorium,
Purulia U.P.,
Kalia, Narail.
3days(21-23
March,2011)
WMG Members of
(CSP/SIP:13 and 15)
WMG # 15/1,
15/2,15/3,13/5 and
13/6
30(Male-18
Female-12)
90 95,600.00 Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, Office of the
PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Lutfor Rahman, EE, Office of
the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, Office of
the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), Office of the
PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Hafizur Rahman,EO, Office of
the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Jahangir Alam, Dist.Cooperative
Officer, Narail.
Mr.Hasan Mahmood,DAD,Office of the
Dist.Cooperative Officer,Narail
Mr.Md.Mossaddek Hossain, Upazila
Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail.
Mr.M.A. Talukdar,ISPMC
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
43/
2010-11
Basic training on
Carp poly-culture in
SAIWRPMP area.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
U.P., Kalia,
Narail.
3days(21-23
March,2011)
WMG Members of
(CSP/SIP:13 and 15)
WMG # 15/1,
15/2,15/3,13/5 and
13/6
30(Male-19
Female-11)
90 97,200.00 Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, ,Office of the
PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, Office of
the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Amimul Ehsan,Asstt.Chief(Fish),
Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), Office of the
PD,SAIWRPMP
, Dist.Fisheries Officer, Narail.
Mr.S.M.Enamul Hoque,Sr.Fisheries
Officer,Narail
Ms..Hosne Ara Happy, Upazila
Fisheries Officer,Lohagora, Narail.
Mr.Md.Azizul Hoque,Assitant Fisheries
Officer,KaliaNarail
Dr.Shamsul Huda,ISPMC
44/
2010-11 Drafting of Bylaw
for WMG
Union parisad
auditorium,
Purulia U.P.,
Kalia, Narail.
3days(29-31
March,2011)
WMG Members of
(CSP/SIP:13 and 15)
WMG # 13/2,
13/3,13/4, and 13/5
24(Male-14
Female-10)
72 86,300.00 Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, Office of the
PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Lutfor Rahman, EE, Office of
the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, Office of
the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), Office of the
PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Hafizur Rahman,EO, Office of
the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Jahangir Alam, Dist.Cooperative
Officer, Narail.
Mr.Hasan Mahmood,DAD,Office of the
Dist.Cooperative Officer,Narail
Mr.Md.Mossaddek Hossain, Upazila
Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail.
Mr.M.A. Talukdar,ISPMC
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
45/
2010-11
Basic training on
Carp poly-culture in
SAIWRPMP area.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
U.P., Kalia,
Narail.
3days(29-31
March,2011)
WMG Members of
(CSP/SIP:13 and 15)
WMG # 13/2, 13/3,13/4
and 13/5
24(Male-16
Female-8)
72 89,100.00 Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, ,Office of the
PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, Office of
the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Amimul Ehsan,Asstt.Chief(Fish),
Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), Office of the
PD,SAIWRPMP
, Dist.Fisheries Officer, Narail.
Mr.S.M.Enamul Hoque,Sr.Fisheries
Officer,Narail
Ms..Hosne Ara Happy, Upazila
Fisheries Officer,Lohagora, Narail.
Mr.Md.Azizul Hoque,Assitant Fisheries
Officer,KaliaNarail
Dr.Shamsul Huda,ISPMC
46/
2010-11 Cultivation
Procedure of
different crops and
Vegetables
gardening.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
U.P.
3days(04-06
April, 2011)
WMG Members of
CSP/SIP:13-15) WMG
# 15/4, 15/5, 15/6 and
15/7
32(Male-25
Female-7)
96 100,700.00 Mr.Jahangir Islam, DCA, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(Sociology), Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md Alamgir, Research Officer (Economics),Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Deputy Director,DAE,Narail
Mr. King Kor Chandra Das, Upazila Agriculture officer, Kalia, Narail.
Mr.Ruhul Amin, Upazila Agriculture Officer, Narail Sador , Narail
SAAO (BS), Babra-Hasla UP, Kalia, Narail.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
47/
2010-11
Registration
procedures for
WMG.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Purulia U.P
3days(04-06
April, 2011)
WMG Members of
CSP/SIP:13-15) WMG
# 13/3, 13/4, 13/5 and
13/6
32(Male-18
Female-14)
96 98,800.00 Mr.Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(Sociology), Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Hafizur Rahman,EO, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md. Alamgir, Research Offecer (Economics), Office of the PD, SAIWRPMP.
Mr.Md.Jahangir Alam,Dist. Cooperative Officer,Narail
Mr.Hashan Mahmood, DAR, Office of the Dist.Cooperative Officer, Narail.
Mr. Mosaddeque Hossain, Upazila Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail.
Mr. Parimal Kumar Das, Assit Inspector Upazila Cooperative Office, Kalia, Narail
Mr. Mobarok Ali Talukdar, Cooperative Specialist, ISPMC
48/
2010-11 Cultivation
Procedure of
different crops and
Vegetables
gardening.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
U.P.
3days(10-12
April, 2011)
WMG Members of
CSP/SIP:13-15) WMG
# 15/1, 15/2, 15/3 and
13/6
32(Male-23
Female-9)
96 100,700.00 Mr.Jahangir Islam, DCA, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(Sociology), Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md Alamgir, Research Officer (Economics),Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Deputy Director,DAE,Narail
Mr. King Kor Chandra Das, Upazila Agriculture officer, Kalia, Narail.
Mr.Ruhul Amin, Upazila Agriculture Officer, Narail Sador , Narail
SAAO (BS), Babra-Hasla UP, Kalia, Narail.
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
49/
2010-11
Registration
procedures for
WMG.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Purulia U.P
3days(10-12
April, 2011)
WMG Members of
CSP/SIP:13-15) WMG
# 13/2, 15/7, 15/6 and
15/5
32(Male-22
Female-10)
96 98,800.00 Mr.Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(Sociology), Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Hafizur Rahman,EO, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md. Alamgir, Research Offecer (Economics), Office of the PD, SAIWRPMP.
Mr.Md.Jahangir Alam,Dist. Cooperative Officer,Narail
Mr.Hashan Mahmood, DAR, Office of the Dist.Cooperative Officer, Narail.
Mr. Mosaddeque Hossain, Upazila Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail.
Mr. Parimal Kumar Das, Assit Inspector Upazila Cooperative Office, Kalia, Narail
Mr. Mobarok Ali Talukdar, Cooperative Specialist, ISPMC
50/
2010-11 Cultivation
Procedure of
different crops and
Vegetables
gardening.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
U.P.
3days(16-18
April, 2011)
WMG Members of
CSP/SIP:13-15) WMG
# 13/5, 13/4, 13/3 and
13/2
32(Male-21
Female-11)
96 100,700.00 Mr.Jahangir Islam, DCA, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(Sociology), Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md Alamgir, Research Officer (Economics),Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Deputy Director,DAE,Narail
Mr. King Kor Chandra Das, Upazila Agriculture officer, Kalia, Narail.
Mr.Ruhul Amin, Upazila Agriculture Officer, Narail Sador , Narail
SAAO (BS), Babra-Hasla UP, Kalia, Narai
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
51/
2010-11
Registration
procedures for
WMG.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Purulia U.P
3days(16-18
April, 2011)
WMG Members of
CSP/SIP:13-15) WMG
# 15/4, 15/3, 15/2 and
15/1
32(Male-18
Female-14)
96 98,800.00 Mr.Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(Sociology), Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Hafizur Rahman,EO, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md. Alamgir, Research Offecer (Economics), Office of the PD, SAIWRPMP.
Mr.Md.Jahangir Alam,Dist. Cooperative Officer,Narail
Mr.Hashan Mahmood, DAR, Office of the Dist.Cooperative Officer, Narail.
Mr. Mosaddeque Hossain, Upazila Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail.
Mr. Parimal Kumar Das, Assit Inspector Upazila Cooperative Office, Kalia, Narail
Mr. Mobarok Ali Talukdar, Cooperative Specialist, ISPMC
52/2010-
11
Basic training on
Gift Telapia culture
in SAIWRPMP
area.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
U.P., Kalia,
Narail.
3days(19-21
April,2011)
WMG Members of
(CSP/SIP:13 and 15)
WMG # 13/2, 13/3,13/5
and 13/6
32(Male-24
Female-8)
96 100,550.00 Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, ,Office of the
PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, Office of
the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Amimul Ehsan,Asstt.Chief(Fish),
Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), Office of the
PD,SAIWRPMP
, Dist.Fisheries Officer, Narail.
Mr.S.M.Enamul Hoque,Sr.Fisheries
Officer,Narail
Ms..Hosne Ara Happy, Upazila
Fisheries Officer,Lohagora, Narail.
Mr.Md.Alamgir, RO, SAIWRPMP
Dr.Shamsul Huda, Fisheries Specialist,
ISPMC
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
53/
2010-11
Procedure of Book
Keeping for WMG
Union parisad
auditorium,
Purulia U.P.,
Kalia, Narail.
3days(19-21
April,2011)
WMG Members of
(CSP/SIP:13 and 15)
WMG # 13/3, 13/4,13/5
and 13/6
32(Male-15
Female-17)
96 98,800.00 Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, ,Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), PMO
Mr. Md. Hafizur Rahman, EO, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Jahangir Alam, Dist.Cooperative Officer, Narail.
Mr.Hasan Mahmood,DAD,Office of the Dist.Cooperative Officer,Narail
Mr.Md.Mossaddek Hossain, Upazila Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail.
Mr. Parimal mKumar Das, Inspector of Cooperative, Kalia , Narail
Mr. Mobarak Ali Talukdar, Cooperative Specialist, ISPMC.
Mr.Md.Alamgir, RO, SAIWRPMP
54/2010-
11
Basic training on
Gift Telapia culture
in SAIWRPMP
area.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
U.P., Kalia,
Narail.
3days(23-25
April,2011)
WMG Members of
(CSP/SIP:13 and 15)
WMG # 13/4, 15/1,15/5
and 15/6
32(Male-21
Female-11)
96 100,550.00 Mr. Ferdous Ahmmed, Asstt. Director,
Dte of Fisheries, Dhaka.
Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, ,Office of the
PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, Office of
the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Amimul Ehsan,Asstt.Chief(Fish),
Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), Office of the
PD,SAIWRPMP
, Dist.Fisheries Officer, Narail.
Mr.S.M.Enamul Hoque,Sr.Fisheries
Officer,Narail
Ms..Hosne Ara Happy, Upazila
Fisheries Officer,Lohagora, Narail.
Mr.Md.Alamgir, RO, SAIWRPMP
Dr.Shamsul Huda, Fisheries Specialist,
ISPMC
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
55/2010-
11
Procedure of Book
Keeping for WMG
Union parisad
auditorium,
Purulia U.P.,
Kalia, Narail.
3days(23-25
April,2011)
WMG Members of
(CSP/SIP:13 and 15)
WMG # 13/2, 15/5,15/6
and 15/7
32(Male-23
Female-9)
96 98,800.00 Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, ,Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), PMO
Mr. Md. Hafizur Rahman, EO, PMO
Mr.Jahangir Alam, Dist.Cooperative Officer, Narail.
Mr.Hasan Mahmood,DAR,Office of the Dist.Cooperative Officer,Narail
Mr.Md.Mossaddek Hossain, Upazila Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail.
Mr. Parimal mKumar Das, Inspector of Cooperative, Kalia , Narail
Mr. Mobarak Ali Talukdar, Cooperative Specialist, ISPMC.
Mr.Md.Alamgir, RO, SAIWRPMP
56/2010-
11
Basic training on
Gift Telapia culture
in SAIWRPMP
area.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
U.P., Kalia,
Narail.
3days(26-28
April,2011)
WMG Members of
(CSP/SIP:13 and 15)
WMG # 15/7, 15/3,15/2
and 15/4
32(Male-24
Female-8)
96 100,550.00 Mr. Ferdous Ahmmed, Asstt. Director,
Dte of Fisheries, Dhaka.
Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, ,Office of the
PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, Office of
the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr.Amimul Ehsan, Asstt. Chief (Fish),
PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), PMO
, Dist.Fisheries Officer, Narail.
Mr.S.M.Enamul Hoque,Sr.Fisheries
Officer,Narail
Ms..Hosne Ara Happy, Upazila
Fisheries Officer,Lohagora, Narail.
Mr.Md.Alamgir, RO, SAIWRPMP
Dr.Shamsul Huda, Fisheries Specialist,
ISPMC
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
57/2010-
11
Procedure of Book
Keeping for WMG
Union parisad
auditorium,
Purulia U.P.,
Kalia, Narail.
3days(26-28
April,2011)
WMG Members of
(CSP/SIP:13 and 15)
WMG # 15/1, 15/2,
15/3 and 15/4
32(Male-26
Female-6)
96 98,800.00 Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, ,Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO
Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), PMO
Mr. Md. Hafizur Rahman, EO, PMO
Mr.Jahangir Alam, Dist.Cooperative Officer, Narail.
Mr.Hasan Mahmood,DAR,Office of the Dist.Cooperative Officer,Narail
Mr.Md.Mossaddek Hossain, Upazila Cooperative Officer, Kalia,
Mr. Parimal mKumar Das, Inspector of Cooperative, Kalia ,
Mr. Mobarak Ali Talukdar, Cooperative Specialist, ISPMC.
Mr.Md.Alamgir, RO, SAIWRPMP
60/2010-
11
Field Training and
sharing
experiences of
High value crop
production.
BARRI Regional
office, Tala,
Satkhira
1 day
(10.05.2011)
WMG members
(Conveners of
Agriculture sub-
committee of
SW/NSP/SIP# 8, 9, 16,
21 and
SW/CSP/SIP#13, 15,
16-18).
52( Male-50
Female-2)
52 72,330.00 Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO, Dr. AKM Habibur Rahman, PSO, BARRI, Tala, Satkhira.
Mr. Md. Abdus Samad, Scientific Asstt., BARRI, Satkhira.
Mr. Mainuddin Fakir, PSO, BARRI, Satkhira.
Mr. Md. Hafizur Rahman , EO, PMO,SAIWRPMP
61/2010-
11
Field Training and
sharing
experiences of
CAP
Giala-Ghosh
para Dugdha
Utpadon Kari
Samity, Tala,
Satkhira.
1 day
(10.05.2011)
WMG members
(Conveners of
Livelihood sub-
committee of
SW/NSP/SIP# 8, 9, 16,
21 and
SW/CSP/SIP#13, 15,
16-18).
52( Male-4
Female-48)
52 71,000.00 Mr. Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO,
Mr. Proshanto Kumar Ghos, Secretary, Giala-Ghosh para Dugdha Utpadon Kari Samity, Tala, Satkhira.
Mr. Chironjit Ghos, Giala-Ghosh para Dugdha Utpadon Kari Samity, Tala, Satkhira.
Mr. Subir Kumar Ghos, Giala-Ghosh para Dugdha Utpadon Kari Samity, Tala, Satkhira.
Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS,PMO,
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
62/2010-
11 Operation and
Maintenance of
infrastructure
through
participatory water
management.
UP auditorium,
Purulia UP,
Kalia, Narail.
3 days
(11-13 May,
2011)
WMG members (O&M
sub-committee) of
SW/CSP/SIP#13-
15(WMG#S-13/6, 13/5,
13/4 and 13/3)
33( Male-19
Female-14)
99 97,450.00 Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO.
Mr. Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO,SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS, PMO,SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Manzurul Karim, O&M specialist, ISPMC
63/2010-
11
Seed Production
and Compost
Preparation.
UP auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
UP, Kalia,
Narail.
3 days
(11-13 May,
2011)
WMG members (GL
sub-committee) of
SW/CSP/SIP#13-
15(WMG#S-13/6, 13/5,
13/4 and 13/3)
32( Male-6
Female-26)
96 100,700.00 Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO,SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO,SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS, PMO,SAIWRPMP
Deputy Director, DAE, Narail
Mr. King Kor Chandra Das, Upazila Agriculture officer, Kalia,
Mr.Ruhul Amin, Upazila Agriculture Officer, Narail Sador ,
SAAO (BS), Babra-Hasla UP, Kalia, Narail.
64/2010-
11 Operation and
Maintenance of
infrastructure
through
participatory water
management.
UP auditorium,
Purulia UP,
Kalia, Narail.
3 days
(14-16 May,
2011)
WMG members (O&M
sub-committee) of
SW/CSP/SIP#13-
15(WMG# S-13/2,
15/5, 15/6 and 15/7)
32( Male-23
Female-9)
96 96,400.00 Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO,SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO,SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS, PMO,SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Manzurul Karim, O&M specialist, ISPMC
65/2010-
11
Seed Production
and Compost
Preparation.
UP auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
UP, Kalia,
Narail.
3 days
(14-16 May,
2011)
WMG members (GL
sub-committee) of
SW/CSP/SIP#13-
15(WMG#S-13/2, 15/5,
15/6 and 15/7)
32( Male-10
Female-22)
96 100,700.00 Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO,
Mr. Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO,
Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS, PMO,
Deputy Director, DAE, Narail
Mr. King Kor Chandra Das, Upazila Agriculture officer, Kalia,
Mr.Ruhul Amin, Upazila Agriculture Officer, Narail Sador ,
SAAO (BS), Babra-Hasla UP, Kalia,
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
66/2010-
11 Operation and
Maintenance of
infrastructure
through
participatory water
management.
UP auditorium,
Purulia UP,
Kalia, Narail.
3 days
(17-19 May,
2011)
WMG members (O&M
sub-committee) of
SW/CSP/SIP#13-
15(WMG# S-15/1,
15/2, 15/3 and 15/4)
32( Male-24
Female-8)
96 96,400.00 Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO.
Mr. Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO,SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS, PMO,SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Manzurul Karim, O&M specialist, ISPMC
67/2010-
11
Seed Production
and Compost
Preparation.
UP auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
UP, Kalia,
Narail.
3 days
(17-19 May,
2011)
WMG members (GL
sub-committee) of
SW/CSP/SIP#13-
15(WMG#S-15/1, 15/2,
15/3 and 15/4)
32( Male-8
Female-24)
96 100,700.00 Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO,SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO,SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS, PMO,SAIWRPMP
Deputy Director, DAE, Narail
Mr. King Kor Chandra Das, Upazila Agriculture officer, Kalia,
Mr.Ruhul Amin, Upazila Agriculture Officer, Narail Sador ,
SAAO (BS), Babra-Hasla UP, Kalia,
68/
2010-11
Operation and
Maintenance of
infrastructure
through
participatory water
management.
UP auditorium,
Purulia UP,
Kalia, Narail.
3days
(22-24 May,
2011)
WMG members(O&M
sub-committee) of
SW/CSP/SIP#16-
18(WMG# Doel,
Koel,Babui,Moyna and
Satodal )
33( Male-26
Female-7)
99 97,450.00 Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO,
Mr. Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO,
Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS, PMO
Mr. Md. Manzurul Karim, O&M
specialist, ISPMC
Mr. Aminul Karim, P E, PMO
69
/2010-11
Basic training on
Gift Telapia culture
in SAIWRPMP
area.
UP auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
UP, Kalia,
Narail.
3days
(22-24 May,
2011)
WMG Members of
(CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG
# Koel, Babui,Moyna
,Surjamukhi and
Satodal )
33( Male-21
Female-12)
99 100,900.00 Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr.Amimul Ehsan, Asstt. Chief (Fish),
PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), PMO
Mr.S.M.Enamul Hoque,Sr.Fisheries
Officer,Narail
Ms..Hosne Ara Happy, Upazila
Fisheries Officer,Lohagora, Narail.
Mr.Md.Alamgir, RO, SAIWRPMP
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
70/
2010-11
Operation and
Maintenance of
infrastructure
through
participatory water
management.
UP auditorium,
Purulia UP,
Kalia, Narail.
3days
(25-27 May,
2011)
WMG members(O&M
sub-committee) of
SW/CSP/SIP#16-
18(WMG# Beli, Keya,
Surjamukhi,
Noboganga and Ekota
33( Male-26
Female-7)
99 97,450.00 Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr. Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO,
Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS, PMO,
Mr. Md. Manzurul Karim, O&M
specialist, ISPMC
Mr. Aminul Karim, P E, PMO
71
/2010-11
Basic training on
Gift Telapia culture
in SAIWRPMP
area.
UP auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
UP, Kalia,
Narail.
3days
(25-27 May,
2011)
WMG Members of
(CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG
# Koel, Doyel,Ekota,
Surovi, Hasnahena and
Keya )
33( Male-21
Female-12)
99 100,900.00 Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr.Amimul Ehsan, A C (Fish), PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(S), PMO
Mr.S.M.Enamul Hoque, Sr.Fisheries
Officer,Narail
Ms..Hosne Ara Happy, Upazila
Fisheries Officer,Lohagora, Narail.
Mr.Md.Alamgir, RO, SAIWRPMP
72/2010-
11 Operation and
Maintenance of
infrastructure
through
participatory water
management.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Purulia U.P
3days
(01-03 June,
2011)
WMG members(O&M
sub-committee) of
SW/CSP/SIP#16-
18(WMG# Ekota,
Surovi, Hasnahena,
Kanokchapa and
Gondhoraj)
32 96 97,450.00 Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO,
Mr. Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO,
Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS, PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Manzurul Karim, O&M
specialist, ISPMC
73
/2010-11
Basic training on
Gift Telapia culture
in SAIWRPMP
area.
Union parisad
auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
U.P.
3days
(01-03 June,
2011)
WMG Members of
(CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG
# Keya, Beli,
Gondhoraj,
Kanokchapa and
Novoganga))
32 96 100,900.00 Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO
Mr. Ferdous Ahmed, Assist. Director,
Directorate of Fisheries,
Mr.Amimul Ehsan, Asstt. Chief (Fish),
PMO
Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), PMO
Mr.Md.Alamgir, RO, SAIWRPMP
Dr. Shamsul Huda, Fisheries
Specialist,ISPMC
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
74/2010-
11
Meaning and
Functions of WMG/
WMA/JMC in
SAIWRPMP
Union parisad
auditorium,
Purulia U.P
3days
(07-09 June,
2011)
WMG membersof
SW/CSP/SIP#16-
18(WMG# Babui,
Moyna, Doel,Satodol
and Surjamukhi)
33( Male-
25,Female- 8)
99 99,850.00 Mr. Md. Zahirul Islam, PD, SAIWRPMP
Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS, PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Hafizur Rahman, EO,PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Jahangir Alam, DCO, Narail
Mr. Md. Hassan Mahmud, DAR, Office
of the DCO, Narail
Mr. Md. Mossaddek Hossain, Upazila
Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail
Mr. Parimal Kumar Das, Asstt.
Inspector, Office of the Upazila
Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail
75
/2010-11
Plantation Activities
and Vegetable
Gardening in
SAIWRPMP
Union parisad
auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
U.P.
3days
(07-09 June,
2011)
WMG Members of
(CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG
# Keya, Beli,
Hasnahena, Surovi and
Ekota)
33( Male-
24,Female- 9)
99 101,750.00 Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS, PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Hafizur Rahman, EO,PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Deputy Director, DAE, Narail
Mr. King Kor Chandra Das, Upazila
Agriculture Officer, Kalia, Narail
Mr. Ruhul Amin, Upazila Agriculture
Officer, Narail Sador, Narail
SAAO(BS), Babra Hasla UP
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
76/2010-
11
Meaning and
Functions of WMG/
WMA/JMC in
SAIWRPMP
Union parisad
auditorium,
Purulia U.P
3days
(18-20 June,
2011)
WMG membersof
SW/CSP/SIP#16-
18(WMG# Surjamukhi,
Koyel, Bely, Keya,
Hasnahena and
Surovi)
33( Male-
20,Female-
13)
99 99,850.00 Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS, PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Hafizur Rahman, EO,PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Jahangir Alam, DCO, Narail
Mr. Md. Hassan Mahmud, DAR, Office
of the DCO, Narail
Mr. Md. Mossaddek Hossain, Upazila
Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail
Mr. Parimal Kumar Das, Asstt.
Inspector, Office of the Upazila
Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail
77
/2010-11
Plantation Activities
and Vegetable
Gardening in
SAIWRPMP
Union parisad
auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
U.P.
3days
(18-20 June,
2011)
WMG Members of
(CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG
# Gondoraj, Koyel,
Doyel, Satodal and
Ekota)
33( Male-
18,Female-
15)
99 101,750.00 Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS, PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Hafizur Rahman, EO,PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Deputy Director, DAE, Narail
Mr. King Kor Chandra Das, Upazila
Agriculture Officer, Kalia, Narail
Mr. Ruhul Amin, Upazila Agriculture
Officer, Narail Sador, Narail
SAAO(BS), Babra Hasla UP
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
78/2010-
11
Meaning and
Functions of WMG/
WMA/JMC in
SAIWRPMP
Union parisad
auditorium,
Purulia U.P
3days
(14-16 June,
2011)
WMG membersof
SW/CSP/SIP#16-
18(WMG# Ekota,
Gondoraj,
Kanokchapa,
Noboganga and
Surovi)
32( Male-
21,Female-
11)
96 98,800.00 Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS, PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Hafizur Rahman, EO,PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Jahangir Alam, DCO, Narail
Mr. Md. Hassan Mahmud, DAR, Office
of the DCO, Narail
Mr. Md. Mossaddek Hossain, Upazila
Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail
Mr. Parimal Kumar Das, Asstt.
Inspector, Office of the Upazila
Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail
79/2010-
11
Plantation Activities
and Vegetable
Gardening in
SAIWRPMP
Union parisad
auditorium,
Babra-Hasla
U.P.
3days
(14-16 June,
2011)
WMG Members of
(CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG
# Babui, Moyna,
Surjamukhi,
Kanokchapa and
Novoganga)
32( Male-
22,Female-
10)
96 100,700.00 Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS, PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Hafizur Rahman, EO,PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Deputy Director, DAE, Narail
Mr. King Kor Chandra Das, Upazila
Agriculture Officer, Kalia, Narail
Mr. Ruhul Amin, Upazila Agriculture
Officer, Narail Sador, Narail
SAAO(BS), Babra Hasla UP
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
80/2010-
11 Cow and Goat
Rearing for
Collective Action
Plan (CAP) in
SAIWRPMP
UP Auditorium,
Tularampur UP,
Narail
3 days(21-23
June,2011)
WMG membersof SW
/NSP/SIP#8 & 9
(WMG# Madhobilata,
Kalmilata, Sapla,
Balaka, Sraboni,
Falguni, Mollika and
Agroni )
33(Male- 26,
Female-7)
99 100,850.00 Mr. Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO,
Mr. M.M. Doalatana, District Livestock
Officer, Narail.
Veterinary Surgeon, Narail.
Mr. Pijush Kumar Saha, Upazila
Livestock Officer, Narail Sador,
Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS, PMO,
Mr. Md. Hafizur Rahman, EO,PMO,
SAIWRPMP
81/2010-
11
GIFT (Tilapia)
Culture in
SAIWRPMP
Proshika
Auditorium,
Narail
3 days(21-23
June,2011)
WMG members of NSP
SIP: 08-09 WMG #
Swarnalata, Torulata
and Madhobilata
33(Male- 23,
Female-10)
99 100,900.00 Mr. Amimul Ehsan, AC(F), PMO,
Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO,
Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS, PMO,
SAIWRPMP
District Fisheries Officer, Narail
Mr. S.M. Enamul Hoque, , Sr. Fisheries
Officer, Narail
Ms. Hosneara Happy, Upazila Fisheries
Officer, Lohagara, Narail
Asstt. Fisheries Officer,Narail Sador,N
arail
82/2010-
11 Cow and Goat
Rearing for
Collective Action
Plan (CAP) in
SAIWRPMP
UP Auditorium,
Tularampur UP,
Narail
3 days(24-26
June,2011)
WMG members of NSP
SIP: 08-09 WMG#
Baishakhi, Bonolata
and Agroni
33(Male- 20,
Female-13)
99 100,850.00 Mr. Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr. M.M. Doalatana, District Livestock
Officer, Narail.
Veterinary Surgeon, Narail.
Mr. Pijush Kumar Saha, Upazila
Livestock Officer, Narail Sador, Narail
Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS, PMO,
SAIWRPMP
Mr. Md. Hafizur Rahman, EO,PMO,
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Course
No.
Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of
Participants
Total
Trainee
days
Cost
incurred
(Taka)
Remarks/Resource Person
83/2010-
11
GIFT (Tilapia)
Culture in
SAIWRPMP
Proshika
Auditorium,
Narail
3 days(24-26
June,2011)
WMG members of NSP
SIP: 08-09 WMG #
Kalmilata, Jaba, Mollika
and Falguni
33(Male- 22,
Female-11)
99 100,900.00 Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO,
Mr. Amimul Ehsan, AC(F), PMO,
Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS,PMO,
District Fisheries Officer, Narail
Mr. S.M. Enamul Hoque, , Sr. Fisheries
Officer, Narail
Ms. Hosneara Happy, Upazila Fisheries
Officer, Lohagara, Narail
Asstt. Fisheries Officer,Narail
84/2010-
11 Cow and Goat
Rearing for
Collective Action
Plan (CAP) in
SAIWRPMP
UP Auditorium,
Tularampur UP,
Narail
3 days(27-29
June,2011)
WMG members of NSP
SIP: 08-09 WMG#
Borsha, Bonolata ,
Hoimonty and Chaity
33(Male- 9,
Female-24)
99 100,850.00 Mr. Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO,
Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO,
Mr. M.M. Doalatana, District Livestock
Officer, Narail.
Veterinary Surgeon, Narail.
Mr. Pijush Kumar Saha, Upazila
Livestock Officer, Narail Sador,
Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS, PMO,
Mr. Md. Hafizur Rahman, EO,PMO,
85/2010-
11
GIFT (Tilapia)
Culture in
SAIWRPMP
Proshika
Auditorium,
Narail
3 days(27-29
June,2011)
WMG members of NSP
SIP: 08-09 WMG #
Falguni, Sapla,Balaka
and Sraboni
33(Male- 23,
Female-10)
99 102,000.00 Mr. Amimul Ehsan, AC(F), PMO,
Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO,
Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS, PMO,
Dr. Khalilur Rahman, SSO, BFRI,
Jessore
Mr. Ferdous Ahmed, Asstt. Director,
DoF, Dhaka
Total
Part-B = 72
2367(Male-
1513 ,
Female- 854)
6553 6789,180.00
For 2010 - 11 G.Total:
(Part - A + Part - B)
3021(Male-
2068 ,
Female-953)
7886 8937,960.00
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project Bangladesh Water Development Board
Training Plan for 2011 – 12
Capacity development for officers of PMO,SMOs,Line Agencies & NGO (Staff Training) 2011-12 Part-A
Sl. No. Name of Course Participants Trainers Venue Total
event
Duration Trainee Total
Trainees
Trainee
Days
Estimated cost
1 Delineation of Sub-unit
Implementation Plan(SIP)
and Sub-project
Implementation Procedure.
Officers of PMO, SMOs and
Staff of NGO (ASG)
ISPMC & BWDB
Officials.
Jessore/
Narail
1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00
2 Communication tools and
techniques
Officers of PMO, SMOs and
Staff of NGO (ASG)
ISPMC & BWDB
Officials.
Jessore/
Narail
1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00
3 Participatory Integrated
Water Resources
Management
Officers of PMO, SMOs and
Staff of NGO (ASG)
ISPMC & BWDB
Officials.
Jessore/
Narail
1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00
4 Formation of WMO &Rules
of Co-operatives,
Officers of PMO, SMOs and
Staff of NGO (ASG)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Cooperatives &
BWDB Officials.
Jessore/
Narail
1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00
5 Agriculture Extension :
Basic training on
Agriculture Extension
Concerned Upazila Officers
of DAE & NGO Facilitator
(Agriculture)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Agriculture
Extension.
Jessore/
Narail
1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00
6 Fisheries Extension:
Basic Training on Fisheries
Development.
Concerned Upazila Officers
of Deptt. of Fisheries & NGO
Facilitator (Fisheries)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Fisheries.
Jessore/
Narail
1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00
7 Financial Management for
SAIWRPMP
Officers of PMO,
SMOs,RAC & concerned
officers of
Accounts,Audit,Finance Dte.
and Staff of NGO (ASG)
ISPMC, Senior
officers of BWDB &
Resource persons
from ADB, BRM.
Jessore/
Narail
1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Sl. No. Name of Course Participants Trainers Venue Total
event
Duration Trainee Total
Trainees
Trainee
Days
Estimated cost
8 Guidelines of Gender and
Livelihood.
Concerned Upazila Officers
of Department of Women
Affairs, Livestock, Youth
Development, Social
Welfare & NGO Facilitator
(Gender and Livelihood).
ISPMC, Officers of
DWA & BWDB
Jessore/
Narail
1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00
9 O&M of Project
Infrastructure & Upfront
contribution
Officers of PMO, SMOs and
Staff of NGO (ASG)
ISPMC & BWDB
Officials.
Jessore/
Narail
1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00
10 On-job training for use of
Leveling instrument ,Total
Station,DGPS &
Echosounder
Officers of PMO, SMOs and
Staff of NGO (ASG)
ISPMC & BWDB
Officials.
Jessore/
Narail
1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00
Sub-Total Capacity development for officers of PMO,SMOs,Line
Agencies & NGO (Staff Training) (Part-A)
2011 - 12 10 300 900 1500,000.00
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
WMO Training 2011-12 Part B
Sl.
No.
Name of Course Participants Trainers Venue Total
event
Duration Trainee Total
Trainees
Trainee
Days
Estimated
cost
1
Formation of WMO
&Rules of Co-
operatives,
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and
CSP Batch-2(13,15,)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Cooperatives & BWDB
Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
2 Drafting of Bylaws of
Water Management
Groups (WMG)
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and
CSP Batch-2(13,15,)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Cooperatives & BWDB
Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
3 Procedure for
Registration of WMG
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and
CSP Batch-2(13,15,)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Cooperatives & BWDB
Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
4 Procedure for Book
Keeping of WMG
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and
CSP Batch-2(13,15,)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Cooperatives & BWDB
Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
5 Operation and
Maintenance (O&M)
of infrastructure
through participatory
water management
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and
CSP Batch-2(13,15,)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of BWDB
Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
6 Plantation activities
and
Vegetable Gardening
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and
CSP Batch-2(13,15,)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Agriculture Extension &
BWDB Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
7 Seed Production &
Compost Preparation
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and
CSP Batch-2(13,15,)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Agriculture Extension &
BWDB Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
8 Poultry, Goat, Cow
rearing
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and
CSP Batch-2(13,15,)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of Livestock
& BWDB Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Sl.
No.
Name of Course Participants Trainers Venue Total
event
Duration Trainee Total
Trainees
Trainee
Days
Estimated
cost
9 Meanings and
Functions of
WMG,WMCA/WMCS
,JMC in SAIWRPMP
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and
CSP Batch-2(13,15,)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Cooperatives & BWDB
Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
10 Fisheries Extension
Basic Training on
Carp-poly culture,
Nursery
Management, Rice-
Fish Farming, Fish
Culture in Borrow-pit,
Monosex GIFT
Telapia & Sanctuary
Development.
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and
CSP Batch-2(13,15,)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of Fisheries
& BWDB Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
11 Integrated Water
Management,
Objective of WMO,
GPWM and its
application, Co-
operatives, Rules.
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and
CSP Batch-2(13,15,)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Cooperatives & BWDB
Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
12 Gender Awareness
for WMA Members
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and
CSP Batch-2(13,15,)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of Women
Affairs & BWDB
Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
13 Salinity of
River/Surface Water
and its Safe use
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and
CSP Batch-2(13,15,)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Agriculture Extension &
BWDB Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
14 Cultivation of HYV
crop & Crop
diversification (Water
Management,
Fertilizer
Management & Pest
Control)
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and
CSP Batch-2(13,15,)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Agriculture Extension &
BWDB Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Sl.
No.
Name of Course Participants Trainers Venue Total
event
Duration Trainee Total
Trainees
Trainee
Days
Estimated
cost
15 Income Generating
Activities for WMG
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and
CSP Batch-2(13,15,)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of Women
Affairs & BSIC Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
16 Leadership
Development
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and
CSP Batch-2(13,15,)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of Women
Affairs & BSIC Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
17 IPM Techniques for
Crop production
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and
CSP Batch-2(13,15,)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of Women
Affairs & BSIC Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
18 Soil Management
and its safe use in
the project area
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and
CSP Batch-2(13,15,)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of Women
Affairs & BSIC Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
19 Refreshers course
on Procedure for
Book Keeping of
WMG
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and
CSP Batch-2(13,15,)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of Women
Affairs & BSIC Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
20 Refreshers course
on Operation and
Maintenance (O&M)
of infrastructure
through participatory
water management
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and
CSP Batch-2(13,15,)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of Women
Affairs & BSIC Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
21 Understanding of the
Concept of
Environment and its
protection from
degradation
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and
CSP Batch-2(13,15,)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of Women
Affairs & BSIC Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
Sub-total for WMO Training, 2011-12 126 3780 11340 9450,000.00
Grant Total for 2011-12 136 4080 12240 10950000.00
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project Bangladesh Water Development Board
Training Plan for 2012 – 13
Capacity development for officers of PMO, SMOs,Line Agencies & NGO (Staff Training) Part-A
Sl.
No
Name of Course Participants Trainers Venue Total
event
Duration Trainee Total
Trainees
Trainee
Days
Estimated
cost
1 Delineation of Sub-unit
Implementation Plan(SIP)
and Sub-project
Implementation
Procedure.
Officers of PMO, SMOs
and Staff of NGO (ASG)
ISPMC & BWDB
Officials.
Jessore
/Narail
1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00
2 Communication tools and
techniques
Officers of PMO, SMOs
and Staff of NGO (ASG)
ISPMC & BWDB
Officials.
Jessore
/Narail
1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00
3 Participatory Integrated
Water Resources
Management
Officers of PMO, SMOs
and Staff of NGO (ASG)
ISPMC & BWDB
Officials.
Jessore
/Narail
1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00
4 Formation of WMO
&Rules of Co-operatives,
Officers of PMO, SMOs and
Staff of NGO (ASG)
ISPMC, Officers
of Department of
Cooperatives &
BWDB Officials.
Jessore
/Narail
1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00
5 Agriculture Extension :
Basic training on
Agriculture Extension
Concerned Upazila Officers
of DAE & NGO Facilitator
(Agriculture)
ISPMC, Officers
of Department of
Agriculture
Extension.
Jessore
/Narail
1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00
6 Fisheries Extension:
Basic Training on
Fisheries Development.
Concerned Upazila Officers
of Deptt. of Fisheries &
NGO Facilitator (Fisheries)
ISPMC, Officers
of Department of
Fisheries.
Jessore
/Narail
1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00
7 Financial Management for
SAIWRPMP
Officers of PMO,
SMOs,RAC & concerned
officers of
Accounts,Audit,Finance Dte.
and Staff of NGO (ASG)
ISPMC, Senior
officers of BWDB
& Resource
persons from
ADB, BRM.
Jessore
/Narail
1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Sl.
No.
Name of Course Participants Trainers Venue Total
event
Duration Trainee Total
Trainees
Trainee
Days
Estimated
cost
8 Guidelines of Gender and
Livelihood.
Concerned Upazila Officers
of Department of Women
Affairs, Livestock, Youth
Development, Social
Welfare & NGO Facilitator
(Gender and Livelihood).
ISPMC, Officers
of DWA & BWDB
Jessore
/Narail
1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00
9 O&M of Project
Infrastructure & Upfront
contribution
Officers of PMO, SMOs
and Staff of NGO (ASG)
ISPMC & BWDB
Officials.
Jessore
/Narail
1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00
10 On-job training for use of
Leveling instrument ,Total
Station,DGPS &
Echosounder
Officers of PMO, SMOs
and Staff of NGO (ASG)
ISPMC & BWDB
Officials.
Jessore
/Narail
1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00
Sub-Total Capacity development for officers of
PMO,SMOs,Line Agencies & NGO (Staff Training) (Part-A)
2012 - 13 10 300 900 1500,000.00
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
WMO Training(2012-13)
Part-B
Sl.
No.
Name of Course Participants Trainers Venue Total
event
Duration Trainee Total
Trainees
Trainee
Days
Estimated
cost
1
Formation of WMO
&Rules of Co-operatives,
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-4(17,18,19) and
CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-
9,14)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Cooperatives &
BWDB Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6
3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
2 Drafting of Bylaws of
Water Management
Groups (WMG)
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-4(17,18,19) and
CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-
9,14)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Cooperatives &
BWDB Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
3 Procedure for
Registration of WMG
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-4(17,18,19) and
CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-
9,14)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Cooperatives &
BWDB Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
4 Procedure for Book
Keeping of WMG
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-4(17,18,19) and
CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-
9,14)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Cooperatives &
BWDB
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
5 Operation and
Maintenance (O&M) of
infrastructure through
participatory water
management
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-4(17,18,19) and
CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-
9,14)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of BWDB
Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
6 Plantation activities and
Vegetable Gardening
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-4(17,18,19) and
CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-
9,14)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Agriculture Extension
& BWDB Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
7 Seed Production &
Compost Preparation
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-4(17,18,19) and
CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-
9,14)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Agriculture Extension
& BWDB Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Sl.
No.
Name of Course Participants Trainers Venue Total
event
Duration Trainee Total
Trainees
Trainee
Days
Estimated
cost
8 Poultry, Goat, Cow
rearing
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-4(17,18,19) and
CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-
9,14)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Livestock & BWDB
Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
9 Meanings and Functions
of
WMG,WMCA/WMCS,JM
C in SAIWRPMP
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-4(17,18,19) and
CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-
9,14)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Cooperatives &
BWDB Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
10 Fisheries Extension Basic
Training on Carp-poly
culture, Nursery
Management, Rice-Fish
Farming, Fish Culture in
Borrow-pit, Monosex
GIFT Telapia &
Sanctuary Development.
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-4(17,18,19) and
CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-
9,14)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Fisheries & BWDB
Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
11 Integrated Water
Management, Objective
of WMO, GPWM and its
application, Co-
operatives, Rules.
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-4(17,18,19) and
CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-
9,14)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Cooperatives &
BWDB Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
12 Gender Awareness for
WMA Members
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-4(17,18,19) and
CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-
9,14)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Women Affairs &
BWDB Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
13 Salinity of River/Surface
Water and its Safe use
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-4(17,18,19) and
CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-
9,14)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Agriculture Extension
& BWDB Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Sl.
No.
Name of Course Participants Trainers Venue Total
event
Duration Trainee Total
Trainees
Trainee
Days
Estimated
cost
14 Cultivation of HYV crop &
Crop diversification
(Water Management,
Fertilizer Management &
Pest Control)
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-4(17,18,19) and
CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-
9,14)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Agriculture Extension
& BWDB Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
15 Income Generating
Activities for WMG
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-4(17,18,19) and
CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-
9,14)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Women Affairs &
BSIC Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
16 Leadership Development WMG Members of NSP
Batch-4(17,18,19) and
CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-
9,14)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Women Affairs &
BSIC Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
17 IPM Techniques for Crop
production
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-4(17,18,19) and
CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-
9,14)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Women Affairs &
BSIC Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
18 Soil Management and its
safe use in the project
area
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-4(17,18,19) and
CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-
9,14)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Women Affairs &
BSIC Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
19 Refreshers course on
Procedure for Book
Keeping of WMG
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-4(17,18,19) and
CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-
9,14)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Women Affairs &
BSIC Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H
For all SIP
Sl.
No.
Name of Course Participants Trainers Venue Total
event
Duration Trainee Total
Trainees
Trainee
Days
Estimated
cost
20 Refreshers course on
Operation and
Maintenance (O&M) of
infrastructure through
participatory water
management
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-4(17,18,19) and
CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-
9,14)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Women Affairs &
BSIC Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
21 Understanding of the
Concept of Environment
and its protection from
degradation
WMG Members of NSP
Batch-4(17,18,19) and
CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-
9,14)
ISPMC, Officers of
Department of
Women Affairs &
BSIC Officials.
Suitable Venue
at Narail or
Project area.
6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00
Sub-total for WMO Training 126 3780 11340 9450,000.00
Grant Total for 2012-13 136 4080 12240 10950000.00