Chemical Inves of Seaweed of Brown Algae
-
Upload
nirmala-nimi -
Category
Documents
-
view
31 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Chemical Inves of Seaweed of Brown Algae
29
PART-I
CHEMICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE
POLYSACCHARIDES OF SOME BROWN SEAWEED
SPECIES
30
Chapter-I.1
Chemical studies on the alginate of brown seaweed
species: Sargassum tenerrimum, Sargassum wightii,
Cystoseira indica and Padina tetrastromatica
31
I.1.1 INTRODUCTION
I.1.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
I.1.2.1 Collection of seaweeds
I.1.2.2 Extraction of alginate from seaweeds
I.1.2.3 Characterization of alginate
I.1.2.3.1 Determination M/G ratio
I.1.2.3.2 Determination of M and G blocks
I.1.2.3.3 Viscosity measurement
I.1.2.3.4 Molecular weight determination (GPC)
I.1.2.3.5 FT-IR spectroscopy
I.1.2.3.6 13
C NMR spectroscopy
I.1.2.3.7 Optical rotation and Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy
I.1.2.3.8 Scanning electron microscope (SEM)
I.1.2.3.9 X-ray diffraction analysis
I.1.2.3.10 Rheological determinations
I.1.3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
I.1.3.1 Physicochemical results
I.1.3.2 Molecular weight determination (GPC)
I.1.3.3 FT-IR spectroscopy
I.1.3.4 13
C NMR spectroscopy
I.1.3.5 Optical rotation and Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy
I.1.3.6 Scanning electron microscope (SEM)
I.1.3.7 X-ray diffraction analysis
I.1.3.8 Rheological measurements
I.1.4 CONCLUSION
I.1.5 REFERENCES
Chemical studies on the alginate of brown seaweed species:
Sargassum tenerrimum, Sargassum wightii, Cystoseira indica
and Padina tetrastromatica 1
32
I.1.1 INTRODUCTION
Seaweeds are the only natural source of agar, carrageenan and alginates, the
industrially important polysaccharides. The former two phycocolloids are synthesized
by red seaweeds, and the latter being produced exclusively by their brown
counterparts except one recent report of alginate from a red calcareous alga Corallina
pilulifera Usov et al. (1995). It is noteworthy that alginates are also produced by
bacteria viz. Azotobacter vinelandii and several Pseudomonas species Skjak-Braek et
al. (1986). Alginates are hydrocolloids, water soluble biopolymers extracted from
brown seaweed. They were first investigated in the late 19th
century by a British
chemist E.C. Stanford. (www.fao.org). “Alginate” is a collective term for a family of
polysaccharides produced by brown algae (Painter 1983). It is a polysaccharide
consisting of linear co-polymer of β-1,4-D-mannuronic acid and α-1,4-L-guluronic
acid Haug et al. (1966) (Figure I.1.1). The average lengths of the blocks being about
20 units and the proportions of the two acids have been found to vary in the extracts
of different species and even in different parts of the same plant. Alginate is present
as salts of different metals, primarily Na+
and Ca+2
. It occurs in both the intercellular
regions and the cell walls and it is considered to be the principal skeletal material of
all brown seaweeds (Haug et al.1967; Ji et al. 1981; Cora et al. 1992; Nishide et al.
1996).
The main brown seaweeds that are processed commercially worldwide for the
alginate are Macrocystis pyrifera, Laminaria spp., Ascophyllum spp., Ecklonia spp.,
Lessonia spp. and Padina gymnospora. None of them occur in the Indian waters
except for some other Padina species. Extraction of alginic acid/alginate from brown
algae and characterization has been reported by many authors (Haug & Larsen 1962;
Haugh, Larsen & Smidsrod, 1974; Nishide et al. 1987; Andrade et al. 2004).
The worldwide annual industrial production of alginate is estimated to be 30,000
metric tons, which is probably less than 10% of the biosynthesized material in crops
of macroalgae. These figures allow us to consider such a polysaccharide as an
unlimited and renewable resource even for a steadily growing industry (Draget et al.
2005). In addition, alginate production by fermentation is also technically possible,
although it dose not meet the requirement of economic feasibility.
The Indian production of alginate is mainly from Sargassum spp. There exist a few
reports on alginate from Indian waters (Alankararao, 1988; Mody et al. 1992; Redekar
and Raje 2000 and Ganesan et al. 2001). There are, however, no reports on the
detailed systematic chemical investigation of alginates of Indian brown seaweeds.
33
Therefore, Sargassum tenerrimum, Sargassum wightii (Family: Sargassaceae),
Cystoseira indica (Family: Cystoseiraceae) and Padina tetrastromatica (Family:
Dictyotaceae) were selected for detailed chemical studies for their alginates.
The main industrial applications of alginate as a natural polymeric material are linked
to its stabilizing, viscosifying, gelling properties and its ability to retain water.
Alginate is largely used as a viscosifier in textile printing because of its shear-thinning
characteristics. Its use has also been reported to increase color yield and brightness. In
addition, various applications of alginate in the food industry are currently being
exploited. The ability of this polysaccharide to stabilize aqueous mixtures, dispersions
and emulsions together with its gel-forming and viscosifying properties represent key
features for the use of alginate in food applications. Several alginate-based
restructured products (pet food, reformed meet, onion rings, crab sticks, to name few)
are available on the market for large-scale distribution (Cotterll and Kovacs 1980;
Littlecott 1982; Sime 1990). In addition, alginate is widely used as an additive for the
production of low-sugar jam, jellies and fruit fillings (Toft et al. 1986). In these
applications, synergistic interactions with proteins and other polysaccharide are
exploited.
Alginates well meet all the requirements for their use in pharmaceutical and medical
applications. They have been largely used in wound dressings, dental impression and
formulations for preventing gastric reflux. However, the most advanced
biotechnological and biomedical applications of alginate resides in its use as a
hydrogel for cell immobilization for applications ranging from production of ethanol
from yeast cells and of antibiotics or steroids (Smidsrod and Skjak-Breaek 1990) to
transplantation and cell therapy (Lim and Sun 1980). In the latter case, alginate gel is
used as a selective immune barrier to protect the transplanted cells from the host
immune system.
There has been a notable increase in the number of alginate applications in recent
years and the possibility of using such a polysaccharide for advanced biomedical
therapies requires very detailed knowledge of its molecular characteristics. In fact, a
clear understanding of the structure-function relationships is crucial for successful
preparation of refined alginates for those applications where specific biochemical and
physicochemical features have to be met. In addition, engineering of alginate
molecules, by tailor-making their composition and properties or by introducing cell-
specific signals, represents an important step forward for future novel applications in
biotechnology field.
34
I.1.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
I.1.2.1 Collection of seaweeds
The seaweeds of this investigation were collected from the Indian coasts and the
details are: Sargassum tenerrimum was collected during March 2008 to April 2008
from Veraval (20o 54.875’ N, 70
o 20.832
’ E), Diu (20
o 42.727’ N, 70
o 55.487
’ E), from
the inter-tidal zone on the west coast of India. Sargassum weightii used in this study
was collected during December 2007 to February 2008 from Hare island (09o 11.749’
N, 79o
03.31’ E) from the inter-tidal zone on the southeast coast. Cystoseira indica
used in this study was collected in January, 2008 from Diu (20o 42.727’ N, 70
o
55.487’ E), from the inter-tidal zone of west Coast of India. Padina tetrastromatica
used in this study was collected during January-February 2008 from Okha (22o
28.580’ N, 69o
04.254’ E) from the inter-tidal zone on the west coast and Valai island
(09o 10.445’ N, 78
o 55.55
’ E) from the inter-tidal zone on the southeast coast of India
(Oza and Zaidi, 2001; www.algaebase.org). Herbaria specimens of all the seaweed
species were submitted with the CSMCRI Herbarium.
All the seaweeds were washed with tap water to remove the solid impurities from the
plants and were dried in the shade and powdered in a rotating ball mill and stored in
separate plastic containers. Methanol (MeOH), formalin, sodium carbonate (Na2CO3),
sodium hydroxide (NaOH), hydrochloric acid (HCl), sulphuric acid (H2SO4) of LR
grade were used and were purchased from Ranbaxy Fine Chemicals Ltd., Mohali,
Punjab (India). Sigma (A2158-250G) alginate was used as a reference sample for
benchmarking.
I.1.2.2 Extraction of alginate from seaweeds
Pretreatment: Dried algal powder was defatted with repeated extraction with MeOH
(100ml X 4) in a percolator for four days at room temperature. Then 10g of each algal
material were treated with 90ml of 0.1% formalin overnight (Dea, 1986). The residual
formalin solution was drained off. Then the algal material was washed with water
thrice and dried at room temperature and then at 40oC.
Alginate was extracted by the method described by Nishide et al. (1996). A 10g
sample of pretreated dry algal fronds were first soaked in warm distilled water (60oC,
300ml) for 1h and then filtered through nylon cloth. After homogenization of the algal
material, it was extracted with 200ml of Na2CO3 solution (0.17N) under stirring
condition at 75oC for 4h. Distilled water (800ml) was then added and the solution was
35
separated from the residual algal powder by filtration through a bed of Celite-545 and
was acidified with 10% HCl to pH 1.00 to give a gelatinous precipitate. The gel was
allowed to stand at room temperature for 3h and was collected by centrifugation at
5000rpm for 20min. Then 200ml of 50% MeOH were added to the gel and the
mixture was neutralized with 10% NaOH with constant stirring. After standing
overnight, the mixture was filtered through a layer of cotton cloth to separate the
neutralized gel. The gel was washed successively with 60% MeOH, 95% MeOH and
finally with acetone and was dried at 30o for12h. The alginate obtained from the
treated algal material of S. tenerrimum, S. wightii, C. indica and P. tetrastromatica
were designated as STAL (yield 18%), SWAL (20%), CIAL (10%) and PTAL (14%),
respectively.
I.1.2.3 Characterization of alginate
I.1.2.3.1 Determination of M/G ratio
Mannuronic acid to guluronic acid ratios (M/G) of these alginates were determined by
a rapid one-pot method of hydrolysis of sodium alginate using microwave irradiation
(Chhatbar et al. 2009). Alginate (5g) was dissolved in 125ml of 0.15M oxalic acid or
0.25M H2SO4 and 25ml portions of the alginate solution were exposed to 100%
microwave power for five different exposure durations (1–5min). The experiment was
repeated with 0.05, 0.15, 0.25 and 0.5M oxalic acid/H2SO4. After microwave
irradiation Polymannuronic acid (PMA) and polyguluronic acid (PGA) were isolated
from the hydrolyzed samples using pH dependent method (Chandía et al. 2001;
Sakugawa et al. 2004) (Figure I.1.2). The mixture was neutralized with CaCO3 and
filtered and the solution was passed through Dowex 1-X8 anion exchange resin
column (100-200 mesh; 20 x 2cm) in acetate form and fractionated by gradient
elution with 0.5-2.0N acetic acid. Carbohydrate of each fraction was monitored by the
Phenol sulfuric acid method (Dubois et al. 1956). Two fractions were obtained,
former being guluronic acid (G) and the latter mannuronic acid (M). Both the pooled
M and G fractions were evaporated under vacuum to a small volume and passed
through a cation exchange resin column (IR-120) to eliminate the cations. The
effluent was again evaporated to a syrup and this treatment was repeated 2-3 times in
order to expel the acetic acid. Upon adding 30ml of water, a small amount of anion
exchange resin (OH- form) was added to remove the color and residual anions. After
filtration, the filtrate was treated with NaOH (pH 8) to sufficiently transform the
lactones to sodium uronate. The solution was allowed to pass through a cation
exchange resin column and the uronic acid liberated was titrated (after making up the
effluent to 50ml or 100ml) against 0.1N NaOH to confirm the exact concentration of
36
each uronic acid. The M/G ratios measured by this improved method (with 0.15M
oxalic acid/ 0.25M H2SO4 under 100% MW power for 4min) were comparable with
that obtained from conventionally hydrolyzed sodium alginate (with 80% H2SO4 at
20oC for 18h and then 2N H2SO4 at 100
oC for 6h), which was reported by Haug and
Larsen (1962) and Ji et al. (1981).
I.1.2.3.2 Determination of M and G blocks
The different uronic acid blocks of alginate were determined according to the method
of Haug et al. (1974). Partial hydrolysis was carried out by suspending 0.5g of
alginate in 100 parts of 0.3M HCl for 2h at 100oC. After 2h the suspension was cooled
and centrifuged to give the MG-block fraction in the supernatant. The amount of
material in the supernatant was determined by the method reported Knutson and Jeans
(1968) (vide section I.2.1.2.4). The residue was suspended in water and dissolved by
careful neutralization. The volume was adjusted to give an alginate concentration of
1%, NaCl was added to 0.1M concentration, and the solution was mixed with 25mM
HCl to pH 2.8-3.0. The precipitate (GG-block fraction) was collected by
centrifugation, suspended in water and solubilised by neutralization. The amounts of
uronic acids in the precipitate and in the supernatant (MM-block) were determined
(vide section I.2.1.2.4).
I.1.2.3.3 Viscosity measurement
Apparent viscosity of alginate samples e.g. STAL, SWAL, CIAL and PTAL (1.5% in
distilled water) were measured using a Brookfield Viscometer (DV-II +Pro) at 27oC.
Spindle SC4-18 was used for apparent viscosity measurement at 60 rpm.
I.1.2.3.4 Molecular weight determination (GPC)
For the determination of molecular weights (Mn, Mw and Mz) of alginate samples
STAL, SWAL, CIAL, PTAL and Sigma (A2158-250G) gel permeable chromatography
(GPC) was carried out on Waters alliance HPLC, with Waters 2695 separation
modules and 2414 refractive index detector. Two columns Ultra hydrogel 120 and
Ultra hydrogel 500 were used, column length and diameter was 300mm and 7.8mm,
respectively. The columns were eluted with 0.1M NaNO3 solution at a flow rate of
0.5ml/min. The oven temperature was maintained at 45oC. Dextran standards with Mp
value ranges 4.01 x 105; 1.96 x 10
5; 4.35 x 10
4; 4.4 x 10
3Da. (MW: 6.68 x 10
5; 2.73 x
105; 4.86 x 10
4; 5.2 x 10
3 Da, respectively) were used for preparation of calibration
curve (Figure I.1.3). The molecular weight of alginate samples STAL, SWAL, CIAL
37
and PTAL, poly dispersity and area measurements were calculated using standard
calibration curve by Empower2 software, USA provided with the instrument.
The polysaccharide sample (50mg) was dissolved in 100ml of HPLC grade water
using Tomy ES-315 autoclave (110oC, 30min.), filtered through nylon membrane
filter (Whatman 0.45µm) and 0.5ml of sample was injected in column. The molecular
weights of standards and samples were determined by GPC according to the method
described by Li et al. (2008).
I.1.2.3.5 FT-IR spectroscopy
Infrared spectra of the alginate samples STAL, SWAL, CIAL and PTAL were
recorded on a Perkin-Elmer Spectrum GX FT-IR system (USA), by taking 10.0mg of
sample in 600mg KBr. All spectra were average of two counts with 10 scans each and
a resolution of 5 cm-1
.
I.1.2.3.6 13
C NMR spectroscopy
Noise-decoupled 13
C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance-II 500
(Ultrashield) Spectrometer, Switzerland, at 125 MHz. Alginate of SWAL and their
respective oligomers PMA and PGA were dissolved in NaOH+D2O mixture
(50mg/ml) and the spectra were recorded at 35oC with 5000–5200 accumulations,
pulse duration 5.9 μs, acquisition time 1.2059s and relaxation delay 6μs using DMSO
as internal standard (ca. δ 39.5).
I.1.2.3.7 Optical rotation and Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy
Optical rotations were measured for all alginate samples of SWAL, STAL, CIAL and
PTAL (0.250g/100ml at 27oC at 589nm) on a Rudolph Digi pol-781 Polarimeter
(Rudolph Instruments Inc, NJ, USA).
Circular dichroism (CD) spectra of alginates (Sigma and S. wightii), PMAs (Sigma
and S. wightii alginates) and PGAs (Sigma and S. wightii alginates) were recorded on
a Jasco model J-815 CD Spectrometer, using measurement range of 190–250nm and
at a concentration 0.8 mg/ml (800 ppm). Molar ellipticity values [θ] are reported in
mdeg. The ratio of peak height to trough depth was calculated using Eq. (1), described
by Morris et al. (1980).
Peak/trough ratio = (θtrough − θpeak/ θtrough) ---- (1)
38
I.1.2.3.8 Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
The surface morphology of the alginate samples was analysed on a Carl-Zeiss Leo VP
1430 scanning electron microscope (SEM) applying an accelerating voltage of 10 or
20 kV and magnification 1 to 38 K respectively. Vacuum oven dried samples of
SWAL and their respective oligomeric samples were mounted on a sample holder and
coated with gold under vacuum prior to the studies.
I.1.2.3.9 X-ray diffraction analysis
Powder X-ray diffraction studies of SWAL and their respective oligomers (i.e. PGA
and PMA) were done on a Philips X’pert MPD X-ray powder diffractometer using 2θ
= 10o to 60
o.
I.1.2.3.10 Rheological determinations
The flow curves for STAL, SWAL, CIAL, PTAL and Sigma alginate in 0.1 M NaCl
aqueous solutions (1.0%) were obtained on a Anton Paar, Physica MCR 301
rheometer, cone-plate model C-CC27/T200/SS, at 25oC.
I.1.3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
I.1.3.1 Physicochemical results
Sulit & Juan, (1955) first studied the alginate contents of several Sargassum species.
There are many literature reports on the extraction of alginate, wherein different
extraction conditions and scales have been employed e.g. on laboratory and pilot plant
scales using various brown seaweed species of Indian waters e.g. Turbinaria ornata,
Hormophysa triquetra, Cystophyllum muricatum and Sargassum swartzii (Doshi et al.
1984; Sai Krishnamurthy 2000), Sargassum tenerrimum and Sargassum wightii were
reported by (Redekar and Raje et al. 2000) and (Ganeshan et al. 2001), respectively.
There exists, however, no report on the detailed systematic chemical investigation of
alginates of Indian brown seaweeds. The members belonging to order Fucales
(Cystoseira indica) and Dictyotales (Padina tetrastromatica) are little studied for their
polysaccharide contents. There exists no report of studies on alginate from Padina
tetrastromatica and Cystoseira indica of Indian waters. Therefore, Sargassum
tenerrimum, Sargassum wightii, Cystoseira indica and Padina tetrastromatica were
selected for detailed chemical studies for their alginates.
39
The yields alginates of S. tenerrimum, S. wightii, C. indica and P. tetrastromatica
were given as STAL (yield 18%), SWAL (20%), CIAL (10%) and PTAL (14%) in the
Table I.1.1. Yields were calculated on the basis of as received seaweeds. In the
present investigation the viscosities of the alginates obtained from S. tenerrimum
(STAL, 120 cps) was found to be higher than those of S. wightii, C. indica and P.
tetrastromatica (SWAL, 110 cps; CIAL, 80 cps and PTAl, 95 cps respectively).
Uronic acid sequence e.g M and G block was determined of the samples of alginate
and results were depicted in Table I.1.1
Table I.1.1 Analytical data of the alginates
Alginates of Sigma
alginate
(A2158-
250G)
Sargassum
tenerrimum
(STAL)
Sargassum
wightii
(SWAL)
Cystoseira
indica
(CIAL)
Padina
tetrastromatica
(PTAL)
Yielda (%) 18 20 10 14 -
Viscosity (cps)
(c 1.5 wt%) at
27oC
120 110 80 95 200
MG (%) 30 25 22 24 28
MM (%)
28 20 20 36 32
GG (%)
42 55 58 40 40
aYields were calculated on the basis of as received seaweeds
The M/G ratios and % weights of PGA and PMA obtained under optimized
microwave (0.15M Oxalic acid or 0.25M H2SO4, 4min) conditions in the present
method for the alginate of STAL, SWAL, CIAL, PTAL and Sigma were comparable
to the ones obtained by conventional method reported by Haug and Larsen (1962) and
Ji et al. (1981) (Table I.1.2). M/G ratios obtained with 0.15M Oxalic acid or 0.25M
H2SO4 and 0.5M Oxalic or 0.5M H2SO4 acids were also comparable (Table I.1.2).
This investigation demonstrated that sodium alginate can be hydrolyzed under
microwave irradiation, using mild hydrolytic conditions, as opposed the reported
methods using hydrolytic reaction with high acid concentration requiring longer
reaction time.
The M/G ratio of alginate obtained from C. indica (CIAL) were found to be lower
(0.32) then those of S. tenerrimum, S. wightii, P. tetrastromatica and Sigma alginate
(STAL, 0.61; SWAL, 0.39; PTAl, 0.53 and Sigma 0.78 respectively).
I.1.3.2 Molecular weight determination (GPC)
40
The standard dextran calibration curve and chromatograms of alginate samples of
Sigma, STAL, SWAL, CIAL and PTAL were shown in Figure I.1.4. The molecular
weights (Mn, Mw, Mp and MZ) and poly dispersity were depicted in Table I.1.3.
I.1.3.3 FT-IR Spectroscopy
The FT-IR spectrum of the alginates (STAL, SWAL, CIAL and PTAL) are depicted
in (Figure I.1.5). All the spectra appeared to be identical and the prominent bends
were in the range: νmax (KBr) (cm-1
) 3430-3440 (O-H str, br, s), 2928-2930 (C-H str,
w), 1604-1625 (asymmetric -C=O str, s), 1420-1462 (C-H bending, w), 1027-1031
(C-O-C str, s), the fingerprint, or anomeric, region (950–750 cm-1
) is the most
discussed in carbohydrates (cf. Tul’chinsky et al. 1976; Mathlouthi & Koenig 1986;
Silverstein et al. 1991; Leal et al. 2008) [br = broad, s = strong, m = medium, w =
weak, str = stretching]. The band at 948.5 cm-1
was assigned to the C–O stretching
vibration of uronic acid residues, and the one at 888.3 cm-1
to the C1–H deformation
vibration of β-mannuronic acid residues. The band at 820.0 cm-1
was presumably due
to mannuronic acid residues (Chandı´a et al. 2001 & 2004).
I.1.3.4 13
C NMR spectroscopy
The 13
C NMR spectra of the alginate of SWAL and their respective constituting
oligomers (e.g. PGA and PMA) have been presented in Figure I.1.6. The chemical
shifts are in good agreement with those reported in the literature (Tako et al. 2000;
Zhang et al. 2004; Sakugawa et al. 2004; Leroux et al. 2004) and are furnished in
Table I.1.4. The carbonyl carbons (C-6 position) of mannuronic (M) and guluronic
(G) acids appeared at 176.75 (G6) and 177.25 (M6) ppm (cf. Grasdalen et al. 1981),
and the corresponding anomeric carbons appeared at 101.45 (G1) and 100.97 (M1)
ppm. The remaining carbon resonances were attributed to as follows: 66.48 (G2),
71.50 (M2), 70.53 (G3), 72.90 (M3), 81.55 (G4), 79.35 (M4), 68.52 (G5), 77.30 (M5)
ppm. Very similar carbon resonances were obtained in the spectra of sodium alginate
derived from S. tenerrimum (STAL), C. indica (CIAL) and P. tetrastromatica (PTAL)
and their respective oligomers (e.g. PGA & PMA) (Figures and data for these are not
shown).
I.1.3.5 Optical rotation and circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy
The specific rotation of the aqueous solution (0.25%) of the alginate samples SWAL,
STAL, CIAL and PTAL were measured and results were presented in the Table I.1.5.
All the alginate samples showed negative optical rotation values.
41
Table I.1.2 Comparison of M/G ratios of sodium alginate determined by conventional methoda with those of the present study using
microwave heating.
Reaction conditions STAL SWAL CIAL PTAL Alginate of Sigma
(A2158-250G)
PGAb
(%)
PMAb
(%)
M/G
ratio
PGAb
(%)
PMAb
(%)
M/G
ratio
PGAb
(%)
PMAb
(%)
M/G
ratio
PGAb
(%)
PMAb
(%)
M/G
ratio
PGAb
(%)
PMAb
(%)
M/G
ratio
Conventional
method (80%
H2SO4 (20oC, 18 h)
and then 2N H2SO4
(100oC, 6h)
38.5 23.1 0.60 55.20 21.40 0.387 58.4 19.3 0.33 45.6 24.2 0.53 46.7 35.5 0.76
MW (0.15 M Oxalic
acid, 4 min) c
44.3 27.0 0.61 61.8 24.1 0.39 61.2 19.6 0.32 48.2 25.5 0.53 52.3 40.8 0.78
MW (0.25 M
H2SO4, for 4 min) c
42.5 26.0 0.61 63.5 24.8 0.39 60.4 19.3 0.32 50.6 26.8 0.53 51.5 40.2 0.78
MW (0.5 M Oxalic
acid, 4 min) c
43.6 25.3 0.58 60.4 22.2 0.36 62.8 22.6 0.36 43.8 23.6 0.54 47.3 34.5 0.73
MW (0.5 M H2SO4,
for 4 min) c
40.0 22.8 0.57 57.9 21.5 0.37 59.4 20.8 0.35 44.0 22.0 0.50 45.8 34.3 0.75
a Haug and Larsen (1962) and Ji et al. (1981);
b % of PGA and PMA were calculated by UV-VIS spectroscopy as described by Haug
and Larsen (1962) and Ji et al. (1981); cMW=Microwave heating in the present study
42
Table I.1.3 Gel permeation chromatographic data of alginates
Table I.1.4 13
C NMR shifts, observed for sodium alginate, poly-guluronic acid (PGA) and
poly-mannuronic acid (PMA) recorded in D2O with DMSO as internal standard
Components δ ppm Assignment of carbon
Sodium alginate a
100.97 (100.97) C- 1 of MM
71.50 (70.83)
C-2 of MM
72.90 (72.29) C-3 of MM
79.35 (78.94) C- 4 of MM
77.30 (77.01) C- 5 of MM
176.25 (175.58) C-6 of MM
101.45 (101.44) C- 1 of GG
66.48 (66.04) C- 2 of GG
70.53 (70.01) C- 3 of GG
81.55 (80.71) C-4 of GG
68.52 (68.18) C- 5 of GG
176.68 (175.75)
C- 6 of GG
Poly-mannuronic acid b
100.11 (100.37) C-1 of MM
68.11 (68.78) C-2 of MM
71.43 (71.20) C-3 of MM
79.09 (78.16) C-4 of MM
76.83 (76.21) C-5 of MM
175.24 (174.3) C-6 of MM
Poly-guluronic acid b
101.03 (101.54) C-1 of GG
66.61 (66.04) C-2 of GG
70.27 (69.2) C-3 of GG
81.09 (80.40) C-4 of GG
67.00 (67.16) C-5 of GG
175.16 (173.85) C-6 of GG
aValues in the brackets (Tako, et al. 2000);
bValues in the brackets (Zhang, et al. 2004;
Sakugawa, et al. 2004; Leroux, et al. 2004)
Samples Retention
Time
(min)
Molecular weights (Da) Poly-
dispersity Mn Mw Mp Mz
Sigma
(A2158-250G)
13.8 285785 315668 72895 694348 1.10
STAL 13.0 182394 225066 158637 624652 1.23
SWAL 13.5 76722 119687 72212 297615 1.56
CIAL 13.8 42542 57007 38909 129614 1.34
PTAL 13.9 23053 57514 32435 123132 2.49
43
Circular dichroism (CD) spectra of alginate (Sigma and S. wightii), PMA (Sigma and S.
wightii alginates) and PGA (Sigma and S. wightii alginates) are shown in Figures I.1.7a-c.
The CD spectrum of poly-L-guluronate (PGA) showed entirely negative peak and poly-
D-mannuronate (PMA) had a strong positive peak indicating clear separation of PGA and
PMA after acid hydrolysis of the sodium alginate, while CD spectrum of alginate showed
intermediate behavior, with a peak at ca. 200 nm, and a trough at ca. 215 nm (Figure
I.1.7a). The relative amounts of D-mannuronate and L-guluronate residues were also
observed from the ratio of peak height to trough depth. The peak/trough ratios were less
than 1 for all the alginate samples, indicating high content of poly-guluronate residue in it
(Morris, et al. 1980).
If the peak/trough were < 1, the overall composition of any compound will show negative
CD spectrum. When the spectrum crosses the baseline, then the overall composition
shows entirely positive spectrum (i.e., peak/trough >1) (Morris et al. 1975; Morris et al.
1980; Dentini et al. 2006). The peak/trough ratios of alginate samples were calculated
and results were presented in the Table I.1.5. Very similar results were found with the CD
spectra of sodium alginate from S. tenerrimum (STAL), C. indica (CIAL) and P.
tetrastromatica (PTAL) (Figures are not shown).
Table I.1.5 Specific rotations and peak/trough ratios of alginate samples
Properties SWAL STAL CIAL PTAL Alginate of
Sigma
(A2158-250G)
Optical rotation [α]D
(c 0.25 in H2O, 27oC)
a
-25.67o -68.12
o -45.25
o -53.17
o -26.98
o
Peak/trough ratio 0.59 0.71 0.55 0.48 0.63
a[α]D (0.3% w/v) -0.098
o (10
oC); -0.110
o (at 60
oC) (Tako, et al. 2000); [α]D (1.0% w/v) -
113o
(Bi, et al. 2007) , used wavelength 589nm.
I.1.3.6 Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
The SEM images of sodium alginate (SWAL), PGA and PMA have been given in Figure
I.1.8. The SEM image of the alginate showed mixture of PGA and PMA, while PGA and
PMA SEM images showed different morphologies indicating separation of PGA and
PMA (Figure I.1.8).
44
I.1.3.7 X-ray diffraction
X-ray diffraction patterns exhibited that the sodium alginate (SWAL) was crystalline in
nature, while PGA and PMA appeared in amorphous and crystalline forms, respectively
(Figure I.1.9). X-ray patterns of PGA and PMA confirmed that PMA in the alginate was
crystalline in nature, may be due to the ordered structure and regular geometric
arrangement of the molecules in the PMA of alginate (Figure I.1.9). Very similar X-ray
diffraction patterns were found with sodium alginates from S. tenerrimum (STAL), C.
indica (CIAL) and P. tetrastromatica (PTAL) and their representative oligomers (e.g.
PGA & PMA) (Figures are not shown).
I.1.3.8 Rheological measurements
Rheological behavior is an important parameter for the application of polysaccharides in
the food industry. Flow curves for sodium alginate samples STAL, SWAL, CIAL, PTAL
and sigma in aqueous solution were performed in the concentration 1.0% in 0.1M NaCl
(Figures I.1.10). In the Power-Law model, the solution behavior can be calculated using
Eq. (2) described by Torres et al. (2007).
mγn
----- (2)
Where m is the consistency index (Pa s), n the flow behavior index, the shear stress and
γ is the shear rate. The parameters m and n can be obtained by linear regression analysis
(Marcotte et al. 2001; Torres et al. 2007). The n values for all these samples were in the
range 0.8-0.95. For Newtonian fluids the flow behavior indices are closer to 1. No
variations in the viscosity of all alginate samples at different shear rate were obtained,
demonstrating that all these alginates behaved as Newtonian fluid in solution.
I.1.4 CONCLUSION
Alginates were extracted from the brown seaweeds Sargassum tenerrimum, Sargassum
wightii, Cystoseira indica and Padina tetrastromatica of Indian waters. The yields and
viscosity of the alginates of Sargassum tenerrimum and Cystoseira indica were the
highest and the lowest respectively in this series. A rapid new microwave assisted method
was developed wherein alginates were hydrolyzed to yield M- and G-acids. M/G ratios
determined by this method were in good agreement with those obtained by the
45
conventional heating method (Chhatbar et al. 2009). The M/G ratio of the alginate of
Sargassum tenerrimum was higher than that of Cystoseira indica alginate – this was in
line with the viscosity values obtained. This constitutes the first systematic chemical
studies on alginate of Indian brown seaweeds, which will be useful in the works on the
biodiversity of alginophytes.
I.1.5 REFERENCES
Alankararao, G.S.J.G., Prasad, R.Y. and Rao, R.K., Phykos, 1988, 27, 174-176.
Andrade, L.R., Salgado, L.T., Farina, M, Pereira, M.S. and Paulo, A.S., Journal of
Structural Biology, 2004, 145,216–225.
Bi, F., Mahmood, S.J., Arman, M., Taj, N. and Iqbal, S., Physics and Chemistry of
Liquids, 2007, 45, 453-461.
Chandı´a, N.P., Matsuhiro, B., Mejı´as, E. and Moenne, A., Journal of Applied
Phycology, 2004, 6, 127-133.
Chandı´a, N.P., Matsuhiro, B. and Va´squez, A.E., Carbohydrate Polymers, 2001, 46, 81-87.
Chhatbar, M., Meena, R., Prasad, K. and Siddhanta A.K., Carbohydrate Polymers, 2009,
76, 650-656.
Cora, A.S., John, M.B., Heinz, G.F. and Robert, M.M., Carbohydrate Research, 1992,
225, 11-26.
Cottrell, I.W. and Kovacs, P., Alginates. In: Crawford, H.B., Williams, J. (eds) Handbook
of water soluble gums and resins, McGraw-Hill, Auckland, 1980, pp 21-43.
Dea, I.C.M., The impact of biotechnology and advanced methodologies. In Industrial
polysaccharides, Stivala, S.S., Crescenzi, V. and Dea, I.C.M. (eds), Gordon and Breach,
New York, 1986, p 367.
46
Dentini, M., Rinaldi, G., Barbetta, A., Risica, D. and Skjak-Bræk, G., Carbohydrate
Polymers, 2006, 63, 519.
Doshi, Y.A., Parekh, R.G., Chauhan, V.D. and Taqui Khan, M.M., Industrial
carbohydrate conference, Ahmedabad, January 28-29: 286-302, 1984.
Draget, K.I., Smidsrod, O. and Skjak-Braek, G., Alginates from algae. In: Steinbuchel,
A., Rhee, S.K. (eds) Polysaccharides and polyamides in the food industry: properties,
production and patents. Wiley, Weinheim, 2005, pp 1-30.
Dubois, M., Gilles, k.A., Hamilton, J.K., Rebers, P.A. and Smith, F. Analytical
Chemistry, 1956, 28,350.
Ganesan, M., Mairh, O.P. and Subba Rao, P.V., Indian Journal of Marine Science, 2001,
30, 108-110.
Grasdalen, H., Larsen, B. and Smidsrod, O., Carbohydrate Research, 1981, 89, 179-191.
Haug A. and Larsen B., Acta Chemica Scandinavica, 1962, 16, 1908-1918.
Haug, A., Larsen, B. and Smidsord, O., Acta Chemica Scandinavica, 1966, 20, 183-190.
Haug, A., Larsen, B. and Smidsrod, O., Carbohydrate Research, 1974, 32, 217-225.
Haug, A. and Smidsrod, O., Nature, 1967, 215, 757.
Ji, M.C.W. and Lijun, H., Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 1981, 12, 240-248.
Knutson, C. A. and Jeanes, A. Analytical Biochemistry, 1968, 24, 470.
Leal, D., Matsuhiro, B., Rossib, M. and Caruso, F., Carbohydrate Research, 2008, 343,
308–316.
Leroux, F., Gachon, J. and Besse, J-P., Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 2004, 1771, 245-250.
47
Li Bi, Ye., Jingsong, Z., Xi Jun, Ye., Qing Jeu, T.,Yan Fang, Lin., Chun Yu, G., Xin Jui,
D.,Ying Jie, P., Carbohydrate Research, 2008, 343, 746.
Lim, F. and Sun, A.M., Science, 1980, 210, 908-910.
Littlecott, G.W., Food Technology of Australian, 1982, 34, 412-418.
Marcotte, M., Hoshahili, R.A.T. and Ramaswamy, S.H., Food Research International,
2001, 34, 695–703.
Mathlouthi, M. and Koenig, J.L., Advances in Carbohydrate Chemistry & Biochemistry,
1986, 44, 7–66.
Mody, I.C. and Chauhan, V.D., Research Industry, 1992, 37, 118-120.
Morris, E.R., Rees, D.A. and Thom, D., Carbohydrate Research, 1980, 81, 305-314.
Morris, E.R., Rees, D.A., Sanderson, G.R. and Thom, D., Journal of the Chemical
Society Perkin Transactions, 1975, 2, 1418.
Nishide E. H., Anzai N. U. and Kazutosi N., Hydrobiologia, 1996, 326/327, 515-518.
Nishide E., Anzai H., Uchida N., Hydrobiologia, 1987, 151/152, 551–555.
Oza, R.M., Zaidi, S.H., A revised checklist of Indian marine algae, CSMCRI, Bhavnagar,
Gujarat, India, 2001.
Painter, T.J., Algal polysaccharies. In: Aspinall, G.O., (ed) The polysaccharides.
Academic, New York, 1983, pp 196-286.
Redekar, P.D. and Raje, P.C., Seaweed Research Utilization, 2000, 22, 41–43.
Sai Krishnamurthy, A., Chemical investigation of Indian marine algae with special
reference to water soluble metabolites. Ph D Thesis,Bhavnagar University, 2000.
48
Sakugawa, K., Ikeda, A., Takemura, A., and Ono, H., Journal of Applied Polymer
Science, 2004, 93, 1372-1377.
Schimdt, E. and Vocke, F., Chemische Berichte, 1926, 59, 1585-1588.
Silverstein, R.M., Clayton Bassier, G. and Morrill, T.C., Spectrometric Identification of
Organic Compounds; Wiley: New York, 1991.
Sime, W., Alginates in: harris, P., (ed) Food gels. Elsevier, London, 1990, pp 53-78.
Smidsrod, O. and Skjak-Breaek, G., Trends in Biotechnology, 1990, 8, 71-78.
Skjak-Braek, G., Grasdalen, H. and Larsen, B., Carbohydrate Research, 1986,154 239–250.
Sulit, J.I. and San Juan, R.G., Philipp. J. Fish, 1995, 3, 47.
Tako, M., Yoza, E. and Tohma, S., Botanica Marina, 2000, 43, 393-398.
Toft, K., Grasdalen, H. and Smidsrod, O., ACS Symposium Series, 1986, 310, 117-132.
Torres, M.R., Sousa, A.P.A., Silva Filho, E.A.T., Melo, D.F., Feitosa, J.P.A., de Paula, R.
C.M., and Lima, M.G.S., Carbohydrate Research, 2007, 342, 2067–2074.
Tul’chinsky, V.M., Zurabyan, Z.E., Asankoshoev, K.A., Kogan, G.A. and Khorlin, A.Y.,
Carbohydrate Research, 1976, 51, 1–8.
Usov, A.I., Bilan, M.I. and Klochkova, N.G., Botanica Marina., 1995, 38, 43-51.
www.algaebase.org
Zhang, Z., Yu, G., Guan, H., Zhao, X., Du, Y. and Jiang, X., Carbohydrate Research,
2004, 339, 1475-1481.
49
pH 2.85, by 0.1 N HCL
pH 1.0, by 0.1 N HCL
Precipitate (alginic acid) Filtrate
Precipitate dissolved in 0.1 M
Na2CO3
Sodium alginate
(Sargassum sp or Sigma)
Partial acid hydrolysis
(0.3 N Oxalic/ 0.5 N H2SO4 for 4 min, MW)
Precipitate
(Poly-guluronic acid,
PGA)
Filtrate
Precipitate
(Poly-mannuronic acid,
PMA)
Filtrate
Figure I.1.2 Procedure of polymanuuronic acid (PMA) and polyguluronic acid (PGA)
isolation from sodium alginate.
Figure I.1.1 Repeating units of MG block of alginate
L-Guluronic acid
D-Mannuronic acid
50
Figure I.1.3 GPC calibration curve of Dextran standards with different molecular weight
a
b
51
Figure I.1.4 Gel permeable chromatogram of Sigma alginate (a), STAL (b), SWAL (c),
CIAL (d) and PTAL (e).
c
d
e
52
4000.0 3600 3200 2800 2400 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400.0 cm-1
%T
3436
2932
2340 2163
1610
1416
1299
1092 1034
947 888 818
779 717
621 492 419
3434
2928
2342
2144
1622
1421
1304
1099 1031
948 890
817 672 620
420
3439
2923 2854
2358
1626 1414
1093 1032
949 891
817
623
2934
2365 2146
1607
1413 1093 1034
950 893
816 620
419
a
b
c
d
Figure I.1.5 FT-IR spectra of sodium alginate (a) STAL (b) SWAL (c) CIAL and (d) PTAL
53
Figure I.1.6 13
C NMR of sodium alginate, PMA and PGA of S. wightii
13C NMR in D2O; DMSO
as internal standard
13C NMR in D2O;
DMSO as internal
standard
13C NMR in D2O;
DMSO as internal
standard
54
Figure I.1.7 Circular Dichroism (CD) of (a) Alginate (Sigma, using as reference and SWAL,
prepared in this study), (b & c) PGA and PMA of Sigma and Sargassum (SWAL) alginates.
190 200 210 220 230 240
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
Sigma alginate
(Reference)
CD
[md
eg]
Wavelength(nm)
(SWAL) alginate
a
190 200 210 220 230 240 250
-20
0
20
PMA (Sigma alginate)
PGA (Sigma alginate)
CD
[md
eg]
wavelngth(nm)
c
190 200 210 220 230 240 250
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
poly-guluronic acid (PGA)
SWAL
poly-mannuronic acid (PMA)
SWAL
CD
[med
g]
Wavelength(nm)
b
55
PGA
PMA
Sodium alginate
Figure I.1.8 Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of sodium alginate as well as
PGA and PMA
56
(b)
(c)
Figure I.1.9 X-ray diffraction patterns of (a) sodium alginate (b) PMA and (c) PGA.
(a)
57
0 200 400 600 800 1000
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Shear rate [1/s]
Vis
cosi
ty [
mP
a.s]
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
Sh
ear stress [mP
a]
0 200 400 600 800 1000
0
20
40
60
80
Shear rate [1/s]
Vis
co
sity
[m
Pa.s
]
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
Shear stre
ss [mP
a]
0 200 400 600 800 1000
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Shear rate [1/s]
Vis
co
sity
[m
Pa.s
]
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
Sh
ear stre
ss [mP
a]
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Shear rate [1/s]
Vis
cosi
ty [
mP
a.s
]
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
Shear stre
ss [mP
a]
STAL SWAL
CIAL PTAL
Figure I.1.10 Effect of shear rate on the viscosity of STAL, SWAL, CIAL and PTAL
solutions in 0.1M NaCl at 25oC.