Chem Lab #4 Yara
-
Upload
gabrielle-ladkani-sayegh -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of Chem Lab #4 Yara
-
8/2/2019 Chem Lab #4 Yara
1/5
Reaction Stoichiometry
Name: Yara Sayegh
Subject: Chemistry
Submitted to: Ms. Lady Maalouf
Date: May 11, 2011
Class: IB-1
*Purpose:
-
8/2/2019 Chem Lab #4 Yara
2/5
Yara Sayegh ; 000829016
Page 2 of5
The purpose of this experiment was to determine the mass of calcium carbonate obtained
from the reaction between calcium chloride and sodium carbonate.
*Apparatus/Equipment/Materials:
- 3 beakers (250 mL)
- 2 spatulas
- balance ( 0.1)
- filtration setup
- 1 funnel
- ring stand
- filter paper
- stirring rod
- sodium carbonate
- calcium chloride
- distilled water
*Procedure:
1. 4.0 g of calcium chloride (111 g/mol) were weighed out and dissolved in 100 mL ofdistilled water.
2. 6.0 g of sodium carbonate (106 g/mol) were weighed out and dissolved in 100 mL ofdistilled water.
3. The sodium carbonate solution was poured into the beaker containing the calciumchloride solution.
4. The mixture was stirred. Then the filtration apparatus was set up. The filter paperwas weighed and then the mixture was filtered. The beaker was rinsed and the
contents in the funnel were emptied. After the precipitate was washed with distilled
water several times.
5. The filter paper with the precipitate was placed aside. It was left for the next labsession.
6. Lastly, the dry filter paper with the precipitate was weighed.
-
8/2/2019 Chem Lab #4 Yara
3/5
Yara Sayegh ; 000829016
Page 3 of5
*Data Collection:
Table 1: Data Collection (Mass, Volume, Appearance, etc)
CaCl2 Na2CO3 Filter Paper
Mass ( 0.1 g) 4.0 g 6.0 g 2.2 g
Amount of Distilled
Water Dissolved in(Volume of Solution) 100 mL 100 mL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Limiting or Excess
ReagentLimiting Reagent Excess Reagent - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mass of Filter Paper+ Precipitate
(CaCO3) (after
filtration) ( 0.1 g)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4.8 g
Appearance Before
Dissolved in Distilled
Water
Powdery White Powdery White - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Appearance AfterDissolved in Distilled
Water
Foggy andWhitish/Particles
Visible ClearSolution
Foggy andWhitish/Particles
Visible ClearSolution
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
When Na2CO3 solution was added to CaCl2 solution a very white/milky solution was
formed while filtering the solution a white residue/precipitate (CaCO3) was observedremaining in the filter paper
Figure 1: Filtration Process
-
8/2/2019 Chem Lab #4 Yara
4/5
Yara Sayegh ; 000829016
Page 4 of5
*Data Processing/Data Analysis:
Mass of Precipitate (CaCO3) Formed after Filtering the Na2CO3 CaCl2 Solution= Mass of Filter Paper and Precipitate Mass of Filter Paper
= 4.8 g 2.2 g = 2.6 g ( 0.1 g) of precipitate (CaCO3) were formed.
Calculating the Limiting & Excess Reagents? g CaCl2 = 6.0 g Na2CO3
= 6.28 g CaCl2 are required to react with 6.0 g Na2CO3
CaCl2 is the limiting reagent because 6.28 g CaCl2 are required to react with 6.0 g Na2CO3
while only 4.0 g CaCl2 are available. Therefore, Na2CO3 is in excess (the excess reagent).
? mol CaCl2 = 4.0 g CaCl2
= 0.036 mol CaCl2
# mol CaCO3 = 0.036 mol CaCl2 (since it is the limiting reagent & the ratio is 1:1)
-
8/2/2019 Chem Lab #4 Yara
5/5
Yara Sayegh ; 000829016
Page 5 of5
? g CaCO3 = 0.036 mol CaCO3 x
= 3.6 g CaCO3
Percent Yield =
x 100
=
x 100
= 72.22%
*Conclusion:
In conclusion, this experiment allowed us to visualize the formation of a precipitate, which
in this case was CaCO3, and calculate its mass after filtering a mixture consisting of two
solutions. Moreover, it allowed us to further our knowledge concerning the process of
filtration, as well as developed our skills in observation, analysis, and stoichiometric
calculations.
*Evaluation & Improvements:
In general, the experiment was nearly perfect. However, in order to improve the
experiment as a whole, as well as its accuracy and reliability, more accurate balances can
be used as well as purer forms of the substances and solutions. Also the use of desiccators
would play a significant role in keeping the precipitate formed in a nearly absolute pure
form which would therefore lead to a more accurate reading of the mass of precipitate
obtained.