Charleston 2010 final
-
Upload
jomcclamroch -
Category
Education
-
view
184 -
download
2
Transcript of Charleston 2010 final
![Page 1: Charleston 2010 final](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042614/55990b7f1a28abce5b8b46ee/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
MOVING FROM PRINT TO ELECTRONIC JOURNALS
A STUDY OF LIBRARIES AT INDIANA COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES
Jo McClamroch
Indiana University
Charleston Conference
November 2010
![Page 2: Charleston 2010 final](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042614/55990b7f1a28abce5b8b46ee/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
BRIEF HISTORY
• Skepticism in the early days (1990’s)
– Do users really want this format?
– How “full” is full-text?
– Fluidity of titles in aggregators
– Permanent archival access
• Growing acceptance (early 2000’s)
– Demand and preference for electronic format increasing
– Availability of remote access improving
– More confidence that full-text is truly “full”
– But… is the cost to support two formats sustainable?
![Page 3: Charleston 2010 final](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042614/55990b7f1a28abce5b8b46ee/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
BRIEF HISTORY
• Recognition that electronic is here to stay (mid-2000’s)
– Increasing number of e-journals
– Questions re sustainability of maintaining dual-format
– Archival access ongoing concern
• Now what about print?
– Acceptance that use of electronic journals far surpasses use of print
– Growth in electronic publishing; publishers phasing out print versions
– Reliable archival access available via publishers, Portico, JSTOR
![Page 4: Charleston 2010 final](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042614/55990b7f1a28abce5b8b46ee/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
DEMOGRAPHICS
![Page 5: Charleston 2010 final](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042614/55990b7f1a28abce5b8b46ee/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
PRIVATE or PUBLIC
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
Private Public
![Page 6: Charleston 2010 final](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042614/55990b7f1a28abce5b8b46ee/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
FTE ENROLLMENT
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
Under 1,000 1,001 - 5,000 5,001 - 10,000 10,001 - 25,000 Over 25,000
Under 1,000 26.9%
1,001 - 5,000 42.3%
5,001 - 10,000 23.1%
10,001 - 25,000 3.8%
Over 25,000 3.8%
![Page 7: Charleston 2010 final](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042614/55990b7f1a28abce5b8b46ee/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
HIGHEST DEGREE OFFERED
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
Associate Bachelor Master Doctorate
Associate
Bachelor
Master
Doctorate
Associate 8.3%
Bachelor 20.8%
Master 37.5%
Doctorate 33.3%
![Page 8: Charleston 2010 final](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042614/55990b7f1a28abce5b8b46ee/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
DATA
![Page 9: Charleston 2010 final](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042614/55990b7f1a28abce5b8b46ee/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
TOTAL MATERIALS BUDGET
30.4%
17.4%
13.0%
17.4%
21.7%
$250,001 - $500,000
Over $1,000,000
$100,001 - $250,000
$500,001 - $1,000,000
Under $100,000
![Page 10: Charleston 2010 final](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042614/55990b7f1a28abce5b8b46ee/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
EXPENDITURE – PRINT JOURNALS
Under $50,000
$50,001 - $100,000
$100,001 - $250,000
$250,001 - $500,000
54.5%
22.7%
9.1%
13.6%
$100,001 - $250,000
$50,001 - $100,000
$250,001 - $500,000
Under $50,000
![Page 11: Charleston 2010 final](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042614/55990b7f1a28abce5b8b46ee/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
CURRENT SUBSCRIPTIONS – PRINT
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
Under 500 501 - 1,000 1,001 - 2,000 2,001 - 5,000
![Page 12: Charleston 2010 final](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042614/55990b7f1a28abce5b8b46ee/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
EXPENDITURE FOR ELECTRONIC RESOURCES (INCLUDING E-JOURNALS)
27.3%
18.2%
22.7%
18.2%
9.1%
4.5%
$250,001 - $500,000
Under $50,000
Over $1,000,000
$100,001 - $250,000
$500,001 - $1,000,000
$50,001 - $100,000
Under $50,000 $50,001 - $100,000 $100,001 - $250,000 $250,001 - $500,000 $500,001 -$1,000,000
Over $1,000,000
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
![Page 13: Charleston 2010 final](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042614/55990b7f1a28abce5b8b46ee/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
DECISION MAKING – WHO
![Page 14: Charleston 2010 final](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042614/55990b7f1a28abce5b8b46ee/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
CANCELLATION –PRINT JOURNALS
90.5%
52.4%
33.3%
14.3%
9.5%
Library Committee
Faculty
Librarians
Librarian/Faculty Committee
Library Administrators
![Page 15: Charleston 2010 final](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042614/55990b7f1a28abce5b8b46ee/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
CANCELLATION E-JOURNALS
95.2%
57.1%
33.3%
14.3%
4.8%
Library Committee
Faculty
Librarians
Librarian/Faculty Committee
Library Administrators
![Page 16: Charleston 2010 final](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042614/55990b7f1a28abce5b8b46ee/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
DECISION MAKING – WHY
![Page 17: Charleston 2010 final](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042614/55990b7f1a28abce5b8b46ee/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
GENERAL CANCELLATION FACTORS
81.8% 18
81.8% 18
63.6% 14
54.5% 12
45.5% 10
40.9% 9
31.8% 7
27.3% 6
27.3% 6
27.3% 6
Redundancy
Print used less than electronic
Usage statistics
Change in curriculum
Subscription cost
Space
Faculty recommendation
Electronic preferred by students
Budget reduction
Confidence in perpetual access
![Page 18: Charleston 2010 final](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042614/55990b7f1a28abce5b8b46ee/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
CANCEL PRINT WHEN INCLUDED IN AGGREGATOR
81.8%
81.8%
72.7%
54.5%
45.5%
40.9%
31.8%
31.8%
27.3%
18.2%
Subscription cost
Space
Faculty recommendation
Budget reduction
Confidence in perpetual access
Electronic preferred by students
Change in curriculum
Redundancy
Print used less than electronic
Usage statistics
![Page 19: Charleston 2010 final](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042614/55990b7f1a28abce5b8b46ee/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
SELECTED AGGREGATORS SUBSCRIBED
100.0%
90.5%
81.0%
81.0%
76.2%
71.4%
38.1%
33.3%
4.8%
4.8%
PsycArticles
JSTOR
Education Index Full-Text
Readers' Guide Full Text
BioOne
Business Source Premier
Academic Search Premier
ERIC
Universal Database of Social Sciences and
Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe
![Page 20: Charleston 2010 final](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042614/55990b7f1a28abce5b8b46ee/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
SUMMARY
• All libraries face the same issues and wrestle with the same concerns, “it’s just a
matter of scale”
• Primary decision-makers are the same across libraries
– Librarians
– Faculty
– Library administrators
• Cancellation decisions based on same criteria across libraries
– Subscription cost
– Electronic preferred by students
– Redundancy
– Budget cuts
– Print used less than electronic
![Page 21: Charleston 2010 final](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042614/55990b7f1a28abce5b8b46ee/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
FINAL THOUGHTS
• Some concerns have not been resolved even after 20 years or more of discussion
– Complete confidence in archival access
– Perpetual access to content in titles previously available in aggregators
– Cooperative collection development (either within or across consortia)
• Enduring issues
– Rising subscription costs outstrip budgets
– Space for bound journals is shrinking
• Need to repurpose library stack areas for new programs/initiatives
• Not practical to keep building more and more off-site storage facilities
• Future concerns?