Chapter Entry Strategy and Strategic Alliances 14.

24
Chapte r Entry Strategy and Strategic Alliances 14

Transcript of Chapter Entry Strategy and Strategic Alliances 14.

Chapter

Entry Strategy and Strategic Alliances

14

McGraw-Hill/IrwinInternational Business, 5/e

© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

14-2

Case: Diebold

Began to sell ATM machines in foreign markets in 1980’s

1980’s Distribution agreement with Philips 1990 Diebold establishes joint venture with IBM 1997 foreign sales 20% of Diebold’s total

revenues Diebold decides to go it alone with local

manufacturing presence for local customization Through acquisitions joint ventures

McGraw-Hill/IrwinInternational Business, 5/e

© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

14-3

Basic foreign expansion entry decisions

A firm contemplating foreign expansion must make three decisions

Which markets to enter When to enter these markets What is the scale of entry

McGraw-Hill/IrwinInternational Business, 5/e

© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

14-4

Which foreign markets

Favorable Politically stable developed and developing

nations Free market systems No dramatic upsurge in inflation or private-

sector debt Unfavorable

Politically unstable developing nations with a mixed or command economy or where speculative financial bubbles have led to excess borrowing

McGraw-Hill/IrwinInternational Business, 5/e

© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

14-5

Timing of entry

Advantages in early market entry: First-mover advantage. Build sales volume. Move down experience curve and achieve cost

advantage. Create switching costs.

Disadvantages: First mover disadvantage - pioneering costs. Changes in government policy.

McGraw-Hill/IrwinInternational Business, 5/e

© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

14-6

Scale of entry

Large scale entry Strategic Commitments - a decision that has a

long-term impact and is difficult to reverse. May cause rivals to rethink market entry. May lead to indigenous competitive response.

Small scale entry: Time to learn about market. Reduces exposure risk.

McGraw-Hill/IrwinInternational Business, 5/e

© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

14-7

Entry modes

Exporting Turnkey Projects Licensing Franchising Joint Ventures Wholly Owned Subsidiaries

McGraw-Hill/IrwinInternational Business, 5/e

© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

14-8

Exporting

Advantages: Avoids cost of establishing manufacturing

operations May help achieve experience curve and location

economies Disadvantages:

May compete with low-cost location manufacturers Possible high transportation costs Tariff barriers Possible lack of control over marketing reps

McGraw-Hill/IrwinInternational Business, 5/e

© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

14-9

Turnkey projects

Advantages: Can earn a return on knowledge asset Less risky than conventional FDI

Disadvantages: No long-term interest in the foreign country May create a competitor Selling process technology may be selling

competitive advantage as well

Contractor agreesto handle everydetail of projectfor foreign client

McGraw-Hill/IrwinInternational Business, 5/e

© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

14-10

Licensing: Advantages

Reduces development costs and risks of establishing foreign enterprise.

Lack capital for venture. Unfamiliar or politically volatile market. Overcomes restrictive

investment barriers. Others can develop business

applications of intangible property.

Agreement wherelicensor grants rights to

intangible property to another entity for a specified period

of time in returnfor royalties.

McGraw-Hill/IrwinInternational Business, 5/e

© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

14-11

Franchising

Advantages: Reduces costs and risk of establishing enterprise

Disadvantages: May prohibit movement of profits from one

country to support operations in another country Quality control

Franchiser sellsintangible propertyand insists on rules

for operating business

McGraw-Hill/IrwinInternational Business, 5/e

© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

14-12

Joint Ventures

Advantages: Benefit from local partner’s knowledge. Shared costs/risks with partner. Reduced political risk.

Disadvantages: Risk giving control of technology to partner. May not realize experience curve or location

economies. Shared ownership can lead to conflict

McGraw-Hill/IrwinInternational Business, 5/e

© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

14-13

Wholly owned subsidiary

Subsidiaries could be Greenfield investments or acquisitions

Advantages: No risk of losing technical competence to a

competitor Tight control of operations. Realize learning curve and location economies.

Disadvantage: Bear full cost and risk

McGraw-Hill/IrwinInternational Business, 5/e

© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

14-14

Advantages and disadvantages of entry modes

McGraw-Hill/IrwinInternational Business, 5/e

© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

14-15

Selecting an entry mode

Technological Know-How

Management Know-How

Wholly owned subsidiary, except: 1. Venture is structured to reduce risk of loss of technology.

2. Technology advantage is transitory.

Then licensing or joint venture OK

Franchising, subsidiaries (wholly owned or joint venture)

Pressure for Cost Reduction

Combination of exporting and wholly owned subsidiary

McGraw-Hill/IrwinInternational Business, 5/e

© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

14-16

Acquisition and Green-field- pros & cons

Pro: Quick to execute Preempt competitors Possibly less risky

Con:

Disappointing results

Overpay for firm

optimism about value creation (hubris)

Culture clash.

Problems with proposed synergies

Pro: Can build subsidiary it

wants Easy to establish

operating routines Con:

Slow to establish Risky Preemption by

aggressive competitors

Acquisition Greenfield

McGraw-Hill/IrwinInternational Business, 5/e

© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

14-17

Acquisition or Green-field?

Well-established,incumbent firms.

Competitors interested in

entry.

embedded skills,routines, culture.

No competitors

Acquisition

Green-field

McGraw-Hill/IrwinInternational Business, 5/e

© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

14-18

Strategic Alliances

Cooperative agreements between potential or actual competitors.

Advantages: Facilitate entry into market Share fixed costs Bring together skills and assets that neither company has

or can develop Establish industry technology standards

Disadvantages: Competitors get low cost route to technology and

markets

McGraw-Hill/IrwinInternational Business, 5/e

© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

14-19

Alliances are popular

High cost of technology development Company may not have skill, money or

people to go it alone Good way to learn Good way to secure access to foreign markets Host country may require some local

ownership

McGraw-Hill/IrwinInternational Business, 5/e

© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

14-20

Global Alliances, however, are different

Firms join to attain world leadership Each partner has significant strength to bring

to the alliance A true global vision Relationship is horizontal not vertical When competing in markets not part of

alliance, they retain their own identity

McGraw-Hill/IrwinInternational Business, 5/e

© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

14-21

Partner selection

Get as much information as possible on the potential partner

Collect data from informed third parties Former partners Investment bankers Former employees

Get to know the potential partner before committing

McGraw-Hill/IrwinInternational Business, 5/e

© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

14-22

Structuring the alliance to reduce opportunism

Fig 14.1

McGraw-Hill/IrwinInternational Business, 5/e

© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

14-23

Characteristics of a strategic alliance

Independence ofParticipants

SharedBenefits

Ongoing Contributions

MarketsCooperation

Benefits

Control Products

Technology

14-23

McGraw-Hill/IrwinInternational Business, 5/e

© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

14-24

Managing the alliance

Build trust Relational capital

Learning from partners Diffusion of knowledge