Chapter 9: Stability of monolithic breakwaters · Chapter 9: Stability of monolithic breakwaters...

39
March 29, 2012 1 Chapter 9: Stability of monolithic breakwaters ct5308 Breakwaters and Closure Dams H.J. Verhagen Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences Section Hydraulic Engineering

Transcript of Chapter 9: Stability of monolithic breakwaters · Chapter 9: Stability of monolithic breakwaters...

March 29, 2012

Vermelding onderdeel organisatie

1

Chapter 9: Stability of monolithic breakwaters

ct5308 Breakwaters and Closure Dams

H.J. Verhagen

Faculty of Civil Engineering and GeosciencesSection Hydraulic Engineering

March 29, 2012 2

important aspects of caisson walls

• Quasi static load• Impact forces

• sliding• turning

• placing on a mound

March 29, 2012 3

historical development of breakwater in Japan

March 29, 2012 4

historical development of breakwater in Japan(2)

March 29, 2012 5

historical development of breakwater in Japan(3)

March 29, 2012 6

schematic pressure distribution for non-breaking waves

( )11

22 coshigHrph

L

ρπ

+⎛ ⎞= ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠

wd = ρgh

??

March 29, 2012 7

load and equilibrium diagram

o

March 29, 2012 8

example of a pressure record

March 29, 2012 9

changes to incoming wave front induced by high mound breakwater

H=γh

March 29, 2012 10

Risk of local impact forces

March 29, 2012 11

Brighton Marina, UK

March 29, 2012 12

Parapet damage

Damage due to typhoon Tokage (Oct 2004)Muroto Kochi, Japan

March 29, 2012 13

Sketch of upright breakwater for stability analysis

March 29, 2012 14

wave pressure distribution

Hiroi

Sainflou

Minikin

p = 1.5 w0H( )

( )

01 02

0

02

20

cosh/ coth

Hp p w hh H

w Hp

khH L kh

δδ

δ π

+= +

+ +

=

=

March 29, 2012 15

Design wave for Goda’s method

• Wave heightcomplicated method (formula of a magician)

• Wave periodTmax = T1/3

• Angle of incidence βAssume an approach of 15 degrees to the normal

March 29, 2012 16

Design wave height according to Goda

( ){ }1/3 0

max * ' * * '0 0 1 max 0 1/3 0

1.8 : / 0.2

min , ,1.8 : / 0.2

H h LH

H h H H h Lβ β β

≥⎧⎪=⎨ + <⎪⎩

( ){ }'0 0

1/3 ' ' '0 0 1 max 0 0 0

: / 0.2

min , , : / 0.2

s

s

K H h LH

H h H K H h Lβ β β

⎧ ≥⎪=⎨+ <⎪⎩

March 29, 2012 17

Goda’s coefficients

( )( )

{ } ( )

0.38'1.50

00

10.29'

0max

0

0.028 exp 20tan

0.52exp 4.2tan

max 0.92,0.32 exp 2.4tan

HL

HL

β θ

β θ

β θ

⎛ ⎞= ⎜ ⎟

⎝ ⎠=

⎛ ⎞= ⎜ ⎟

⎝ ⎠

( )( )

{ } ( )

0.38'* 1.500

0

*1

0.29'* 0max

0

0.052 exp 20tan

0.63exp 3.8tan

max 1.65,0.53 exp 2.4tan

HL

HL

β θ

β θ

β θ

⎛ ⎞= ⎜ ⎟

⎝ ⎠

=

⎛ ⎞= ⎜ ⎟

⎝ ⎠

θ is the inclination of the seabed

March 29, 2012 18

Nonlinear shoaling coefficient

March 29, 2012 19

surface elevation

rise of the water above the caisson:η* = 0.75 (1+cosβ) Hmax

March 29, 2012 20

wave pressure with Goda’s formula

March 29, 2012 21

pressure values according to Goda

21 1 2 0 max

12

3 3 1

0.5(1 cos )( cos )

cosh

p w Hpp kh

p p

β α α β

α

= + + +

=

=

2

1

2max

2max

3

20.6 0.5sinh2

2min ,3

' 11 1cosh

b

b

khkh

h d H dh d H

hh kh

α

α

α

⎛ ⎞= + ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠

⎧ ⎫− ⎛ ⎞⎪ ⎪= ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭

⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞= − −⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠

hb is waterdepth at 5 H1/3seaward from breakwater

March 29, 2012 22

uplift pressure

1 3 0 max0.5(1 cos )up w Hβ α α= +

March 29, 2012 23

safety factors

against sliding μ(W-U)/P >1.2against overturning (Wt-MU)/MP >1.2

MP moment of total wave pressure around the heel

MU moment of total uplift pressure around the heelP total thrust of wave pressuret horizontal distance between centre of gravity

and the heelU total uplift pressureW weight of the unitμ coefficient of friction (order of 0.6)

March 29, 2012 24

Example• “runup” η = 17.2 m• safety factors “just sufficient”

H0 = 7 mT1/3= 11 sβ = 10 º

h = 18 m hcc=11.5 m

hc = 4.5 m

seabed slope 1:50

Wc=

FH

examples: H 7-15; Fslide; T(6) 10-15H 7-15; Fslide; hcc(6) 10-15H 7-15; Fslide; h(6) 15-20H 7-15; Fslide; wc(6) 15-25H 7-15; Foverturn; wc(6) 15-25

d=10 m

March 29, 2012 25

Damage due to typhoon Togage (Oct 2004)

Susami Wakayama

March 29, 2012 26

Overflow over a caisson (1)

3 4.30.2 exp b

ss

Fq gH

Hγ⎛ ⎞−

= ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠

formula of Van der Meer and FrancoFb freeboardγ parapet shape factor

0.7 normal parapet1.0 perforated caisson1.15 is maximum value

March 29, 2012 27

Overflow over a caisson (2)TAW-report “waterkerende kunstwerken”based on research at HR Wallingford

qgem = 5.013 10-3 kwkagHsTzexp(-20.12 kb Fb/(Tz√(gHs))kw wind effect surcharge ka,kb correction for oblique wavesFb freeboard

example:Hs = 1.8 m; Tz = 3 s; Vwind = 15 m/sFb 0.25 - 2; q; Ftype(3)1-3

1= Van der Meer & Franco2= Wallingford/TAW3= Van der Waal, Delft Hydraulics

March 29, 2012 28

Overflow over a vertical wall

North Wirral Coast, near Liverpool

March 29, 2012 29

Hanstholm caisson

March 29, 2012 30

JarlanCaisson

March 29, 2012 31

Cylindrical breakwater, Nagashima

March 29, 2012 32

breakwater with wave power generating system

March 29, 2012 33

semi-circular caisson(for extremely high breakers)

March 29, 2012 34

The Miyazaki breakwater

March 29, 2012 35

Curved slit breakwaterFunakawa Port

March 29, 2012 36

Composite, curved breakwater

March 29, 2012 37

Honey comb wall breakwater

March 29, 2012 38

erosion pattern depending on the grain size

March 29, 2012

Vermelding onderdeel organisatie

39

Do not forget the filter layersct4310