Chapter 9: Stability of monolithic breakwaters · Chapter 9: Stability of monolithic breakwaters...
Transcript of Chapter 9: Stability of monolithic breakwaters · Chapter 9: Stability of monolithic breakwaters...
March 29, 2012
Vermelding onderdeel organisatie
1
Chapter 9: Stability of monolithic breakwaters
ct5308 Breakwaters and Closure Dams
H.J. Verhagen
Faculty of Civil Engineering and GeosciencesSection Hydraulic Engineering
March 29, 2012 2
important aspects of caisson walls
• Quasi static load• Impact forces
• sliding• turning
• placing on a mound
March 29, 2012 6
schematic pressure distribution for non-breaking waves
( )11
22 coshigHrph
L
ρπ
+⎛ ⎞= ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
wd = ρgh
??
March 29, 2012 14
wave pressure distribution
Hiroi
Sainflou
Minikin
p = 1.5 w0H( )
( )
01 02
0
02
20
cosh/ coth
Hp p w hh H
w Hp
khH L kh
δδ
δ π
+= +
+ +
=
=
March 29, 2012 15
Design wave for Goda’s method
• Wave heightcomplicated method (formula of a magician)
• Wave periodTmax = T1/3
• Angle of incidence βAssume an approach of 15 degrees to the normal
March 29, 2012 16
Design wave height according to Goda
( ){ }1/3 0
max * ' * * '0 0 1 max 0 1/3 0
1.8 : / 0.2
min , ,1.8 : / 0.2
H h LH
H h H H h Lβ β β
≥⎧⎪=⎨ + <⎪⎩
( ){ }'0 0
1/3 ' ' '0 0 1 max 0 0 0
: / 0.2
min , , : / 0.2
s
s
K H h LH
H h H K H h Lβ β β
⎧ ≥⎪=⎨+ <⎪⎩
March 29, 2012 17
Goda’s coefficients
( )( )
{ } ( )
0.38'1.50
00
10.29'
0max
0
0.028 exp 20tan
0.52exp 4.2tan
max 0.92,0.32 exp 2.4tan
HL
HL
β θ
β θ
β θ
−
−
⎛ ⎞= ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠=
⎛ ⎞= ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
( )( )
{ } ( )
0.38'* 1.500
0
*1
0.29'* 0max
0
0.052 exp 20tan
0.63exp 3.8tan
max 1.65,0.53 exp 2.4tan
HL
HL
β θ
β θ
β θ
−
−
⎛ ⎞= ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
=
⎛ ⎞= ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
θ is the inclination of the seabed
March 29, 2012 21
pressure values according to Goda
21 1 2 0 max
12
3 3 1
0.5(1 cos )( cos )
cosh
p w Hpp kh
p p
β α α β
α
= + + +
=
=
2
1
2max
2max
3
20.6 0.5sinh2
2min ,3
' 11 1cosh
b
b
khkh
h d H dh d H
hh kh
α
α
α
⎛ ⎞= + ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
⎧ ⎫− ⎛ ⎞⎪ ⎪= ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭
⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞= − −⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠
hb is waterdepth at 5 H1/3seaward from breakwater
March 29, 2012 23
safety factors
against sliding μ(W-U)/P >1.2against overturning (Wt-MU)/MP >1.2
MP moment of total wave pressure around the heel
MU moment of total uplift pressure around the heelP total thrust of wave pressuret horizontal distance between centre of gravity
and the heelU total uplift pressureW weight of the unitμ coefficient of friction (order of 0.6)
March 29, 2012 24
Example• “runup” η = 17.2 m• safety factors “just sufficient”
H0 = 7 mT1/3= 11 sβ = 10 º
h = 18 m hcc=11.5 m
hc = 4.5 m
seabed slope 1:50
Wc=
FH
examples: H 7-15; Fslide; T(6) 10-15H 7-15; Fslide; hcc(6) 10-15H 7-15; Fslide; h(6) 15-20H 7-15; Fslide; wc(6) 15-25H 7-15; Foverturn; wc(6) 15-25
d=10 m
March 29, 2012 26
Overflow over a caisson (1)
3 4.30.2 exp b
ss
Fq gH
Hγ⎛ ⎞−
= ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
formula of Van der Meer and FrancoFb freeboardγ parapet shape factor
0.7 normal parapet1.0 perforated caisson1.15 is maximum value
March 29, 2012 27
Overflow over a caisson (2)TAW-report “waterkerende kunstwerken”based on research at HR Wallingford
qgem = 5.013 10-3 kwkagHsTzexp(-20.12 kb Fb/(Tz√(gHs))kw wind effect surcharge ka,kb correction for oblique wavesFb freeboard
example:Hs = 1.8 m; Tz = 3 s; Vwind = 15 m/sFb 0.25 - 2; q; Ftype(3)1-3
1= Van der Meer & Franco2= Wallingford/TAW3= Van der Waal, Delft Hydraulics