CHAPTER 8: MODELLING MULTIMODAL TRANSPORT … · of multimodal transport corridors within South...
Transcript of CHAPTER 8: MODELLING MULTIMODAL TRANSPORT … · of multimodal transport corridors within South...
227
CHAPTER 8: MODELLING MULTIMODAL TRANSPORT
CORRIDORS-THE CASE OF LAND-LOCKED LAOTIAN
TRADERS
8.1 INTRODUCTION
Establishing door-to-door container-load costs on any given trade is a potential
nightmare for exporters and importers. Invariably it is highly time consuming,
confusing and complex to calculate. The purpose of this chapter is to evaluate the
alternatives routes available to Lao traders when conducting international trade
transactions, and to find the most competitive mode or the best possible combination
of transport modes for export to, import from Europe, and within South East Asia.
Applying a multimodal transport cost modelTP
1PT will illustrate the case study. The model
is stand-alone and flexible enough to be applied to any operational circumstances and
to a supply chain of any length. The validity of this model is tested against a real case
in international supply chain movement, namely the export of garments from
Vientiane (Lao PDR) to the port of Rotterdam (Netherlands), the import of wine from
Marseilles (France) to Vientiane (see routeing maps in Appendix D) and the appraisal
of multimodal transport corridors within South East Asia, from Vientiane to
Singapore (see routeing maps in Appendix E). The main elements of the model are as
follows: cost, time, distance, transport mode and intermodal transfer. The data were
obtained through interviews with Laotian garment exporters, Lao foodstuff importers,
regional logistics/transport service providers and shipping lines.
8.2 BACKGROUND
Tougher international competition and expansion of geographical markets have forced
manufacturers and traders to focus on integrated production and transport logistics
strategies in order to reduce costs, and at the same time, to obtain a higher service
standard. The need to control the transport costs have become as important as the
need to keep down other production costs. The emergence of reliable and competitive
228
door-to-door multimodal transport services can contribute to, and foster, new trading
opportunities as well as increased competitiveness (UNCTAD, 1994a).
The competitiveness of internationally traded products is greatly influenced by
various factors, which build up the overall transportation cost. The cost associated
with the physical transfer of the goods is an essential piece of information in the
negotiation of an international trade transaction (Carter & Ferrin, 1995; Bertazi,
Grazia, Speranza & Ukovich, 1997). Transit time is also an important element as
goods in transit cost money (Allen, Mahmoud & Mc Neil, 1985; Blumenfeld, Burns
& Diltz, 1985; Tyworth & Zeng, 1998). Uncertainty in cost quantifying (direct as
well as indirect) is another issue faced by traders that might disadvantage an exporter
(ESCAP, 1997b). The above-mentioned considerations indicate that trading
opportunities can benefit from better-organised transport services such as multimodal
transport and integrated logistics operations (Marlow & Boerne, 1992). International
transit transport in the South East Asia region has been the subject of much discussion
in recent years with Bezy (1996) highlighting the areas where effort needs to be
focused. Field missions conducted, during 1999, in the region have shown that:
• There is an insufficient use of key waterways;
• There is a need to encourage and promote Freight Forwarding, the development of
Multimodal transport and Logistics Management;
• There is a need to promote the development and expansion of the Inland Clearance
Depot (ICD) concept;
• Documentation, customs procedures and data exchange need to be simplified and
harmonised;
• Greater use of rail transport (partly through the ICD concept) should be
encouraged;
• Better cross-border co-operation and transport co-ordination is needed;
• The use of Multimodal Transport Document (MTD) should be expanded;
TP
1PT Originally proposed by Boerne (1990), developed by Beresford & Dubey (1990), and improved by
Beresford (1999a).
229
• ASYCUDA (Automatic System for Customs Data) and EDI (Electronic Data
Interchange) should be adopted as widely as possible, bringing time, security and
cost benefits.
Another development taking shape is the formulation of an ASEAN Customs transit
system for the facilitation of goods in transit, which forms part of the ASEAN
Framework Agreement on the Facilitation of Goods in Transit TP
2PT. This is a co-
ordinated effort among ASEAN bodies covering customs, trade and transport.
Another ASEAN Framework Agreement on Multimodal Transport is currently being
negotiated. According to Banomyong (1999c), these agreements are expected to
contribute further to the facilitation of goods transported within ASEAN particularly
among the countries in mainland South East Asia.
8.3 MULTIMODAL TRANSPORT CORRIDORS ROUTEING
At the present moment there is no integrated transport or logistics system in place in
the region but various multimodal transport corridors are available to users of the
regional transport network. The smooth flow of freight within a multimodal transport
corridor will determine its success. The case of Lao traders is taken to illustrate the
point, as Lao PDR is a land-locked country with limited access to the sea.
The costs presented in this chapter are based on quotes that were obtained during
interviews with logistics and transport service providers, which operate on Lao PDR
import and export routes. This data is not publicly available. Prices quoted concern
the shipment of 1 TEU (Twenty Foot Equivalent Unit) on a Freight All Kind (FAK)
basis. However, depending on the quantity of goods transported, lower quotes may
be possible. Transit time data was also obtained from the same group of respondents,
from the transit times offered for each route to the variation in delays at critical nodal
links.
TP
2PT Adopted on December 16, 1998 in Hanoi, Vietnam.
230
A confidence rating TP
3PT is also introduced for each route, modes of transport and nodal
links. This confidence rating is based on data collected through interviews with the
various stakeholders. It must not be forgotten that this rating is subjective. The rating
is based on a five point type scale: (1) = Almost no confidence; (2) = Not very
confident; (3) = Fairly confident; (4) = Confident, and (5) = Very Confident. It is also
assumed that the shipment is leaving the point of origin on Monday (or day 1).
This chapter is divided into three parts. The first part deals with the export of
garment from Lao PDR to Rotterdam (Netherlands), the second part will handle the
import of wine from Marseilles (France) to Lao PDR, while the third part will explore
the export routeing alternatives within South East Asia, from Vientiane to Singapore.
TP
3PT For justification see Chapter 5.
231
PART A: GARMENT EXPORT ROUTEING
Cargo description: 1 x 20 foot container stuffed with 408 flat pack cartons (7866
pieces of men shirt), weighting 3,158 kg. The stuffing of the container was done at
the exporter’s premises. The volume of the goods is 29 cubic-metres (CBM). The
value of the cargo is USD 15,732 or USD 2 per shirt. The price is quoted EXW
Vientiane. Existing alternative routes and modal combinations for the movement of
unitised freight between Lao PDR and Rotterdam in the Netherlands are summarised
in Table 8.1.
Table 8.1: Routeing alternatives for freight, Lao PDR-Rotterdam (Netherlands)
Route
Origin: Lao PDR
Mode Intermodal Transfer
Mode Transhipment/ Intermodal Transfer
Mode Destination: Netherlands
1 Vientiane Road Danang (Vietnam)
Sea Singapore Sea Rotterdam
2 Vientiane Road Bangkok (Thailand)
Sea Singapore Sea Rotterdam
3 Vientiane Road Laem Chabang (Thailand)
Sea Singapore Sea Rotterdam
4 Vientiane Road Lad Krabang (Thailand)
Rail Laem Chabang (Thailand) & tranship in Singapore
Sea Rotterdam
5 Vientiane Road Lad Krabang (Thailand)
Rail Port Klang (Malaysia)
Sea Rotterdam
Source: Compiled from industry sources
232
8.3.1 Route No. 1 Via Danang (Vietnam)
Table 8.2: Vientiane-Danang-Singapore-Rotterdam
Day Leg Mode Transit time*
Distance (km)
Cost (USD)
Confidence index
1 Vientiane-Danang
Road 3 days 1,060 750 1
LaoBao-Houei Kaki Customs
2 hours 0 220 1***
4 Danang Charges
0 20 3
THC 0 1 2 5 Feeder
Connection 1 day 0 - 3
Danang-Singapore
Sea 4 days 1,910 400 3
9 Singapore Charges
0 59 4
10 Singapore tranship
1 day 0 - 4
31 Singapore-Rotterdam
Sea 21 days 15,359 1,270 4
Other Handling Charges**
0 700 2
TOTAL 31/32 days 18,329 3,420 2.7 *Assuming no delays ** Include profit ***This confidence rating can be improved with the payment of a higher customs charge or other types of financial incentive. Source: Compiled from industry sources
Route 1 has been chosen because this route represents the traditional route for Lao
import and export (see routeing map in Appendix D1). This is due to the fact that
before the opening of the Lao economy, international trade was generally conducted
with former communist countries and the only access to the sea that was available to
Lao PDR was through Vietnam. Under a bilateral protocol, all transit traffic through
Vietnam must utilise the Lao Bao (Lao PDR)-Houey Kaki (Vietnam) border crossing
and Danang port as the point of entry or exit. The protocol relates to the issue of
transit permit or authorisation for each shipment. The protocol does not cover the
issue of vehicles movement.
233
For goods in transit through Vietnam, a transit permit must be issued in Vietnam, by
the Ministry of Trade, on Application by Lao Freight Forwarder (LFF) through the
Lao Ministry of Commerce. The information on the permit from the Vietnamese
Trade Ministry is then transcribed by Vietnamese Customs to create a transit
document called ‘Import and Export Form for Transit Cargo’. The routeing of
documents from Vientiane to Hanoi to Danang port can take a few weeks whereas the
actual transit time is not more than 3 to 4 days. If there are no administrative delays
when the shipment leaves Vientiane on Monday, the container will arrive in Danang
on Thursday with a feeder connection to Singapore on Friday and arrive in Singapore
on Tuesday the following week. Figure 8.1 illustrates the variation in transit time for
the inland leg, from Vientiane to Danang. The fastest time for the journey is 3 days
while the longest is usually around 10 to 14 days. Lao traders and logistics/transport
service providers provided this estimate. Feeder connection and mainline vessel
transhipment is seen as much more reliable with a confidence index of 3.5 for the sea-
leg.
Figure 8.1: Variation in transit time for Vientiane (Lao PDR)-Danang (Vietnam) No. of Days
1413121110 possible delay*9 Danang waiting time8 (minimum 1 day)765 Houey Kaki Customs4321 Lao Bao Customs
Vientiane 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100Distance (km)
Best case scenarioWorst case scenario*10 days or more of possible delay at the border while waiting for the routeing of appropriate administrative documents
Source: The Author
The confidence index for the whole route is not very high at 2.7. This is due to the
fact that there are too many uncontrollable factors, especially on the land leg of the
journey. Transit via Vietnam is a difficult process. Discrepancies between
ministerial agencies’ strategies relating to transit cargo are one of the main reasons for
234
the very low confidence index of the land leg from Vientiane to Danang. The
confidence index for this particular route can be increase by providing financial
incentives or through personal connections at strategic nodal links such as the Lao
Bao (Lao PDR)-Houei Kaki (Vietnam) border crossing. The sea leg is less
problematic and thus is seen as more reliable.
The delivered price up to Rotterdam, with the transport cost, will be USD 19,152 or
USD 2.43 per shirt. Transport cost represents around 21.5% of the delivered goods
costs.
It is interesting to note that, as expected, the sea leg is the most important transport
leg with 94% of the total journey by distance but only represents 49% of the total
transport cost. Other charges (including Customs) represent more than 29% of the
total transport cost whereas road transport comprises 22% of the total transport cost.
The price obtained through this route is the highest (3,420 USD/TEU) of all the routes
with the longest transit time (31/32 days), but is quite representative of trading routes
where the freight flows are not very important and subject to very strong imbalance.
Currently there are only four-scheduled feeder ships from Singapore with a capacity
of 300-350 TEUs calling at Danang per week, whereas Singapore as a global hub has
main line connection to Europe everyday. Terminal handling charge is still quite
minimal at the moment at only 1 USD. Figure 8.2 shows the movement for the whole
journey graphically.
235
Figure 8.2: Vientiane-Danang-Singapore-Rotterdam (Route1)
Source: The Author
Transit through Vietnam has been difficult because of the poor condition of east-west
roads as a result of user damage. Although the road from Danang to Lao Bao has
been repaired, the movement of goods along this route is still hampered by very poor
roads in Lao. The Lao Bao-Danang route has been selected by the Asian
Development Bank (ADB) as an economic corridor for North East Thailand, Southern
Lao PDR and central Vietnam with infrastructure investment and upgrading of
Danang port. According to the ADB, it is believed that this corridor will divert
freight from Thai ports for the regions named above to Danang port. An appraisal of
the inland leg from Vientiane to Danang shows that Customs cost represents 22% of
the total inland transport cost. The trucking rate for this route is at 70 cents/km.
Figure 8.3 represents the cost curve the inland leg for Route 1.
Cost USD
3,5003,2503,0002,7502,5002,2502,000 Rotterdam1,7501,5001,2501,000 Singapore
750500 Danang250
0Vientiane 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000
Distance (km)Road Transport Other handling charges including profitsSea Transport ( Does not include Rotterdam port charges)
236
Figure 8.3: Vientiane-Lao Bao-Houey Kaki-Danang Cost USD
1,4001,3001,200 Danang1,100 Danang charges1,000
900800700600 Customs charge Houey Kaki Customs500400300 Lao Bao Customs200100
0Vientiane 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100
Distance (km)Road Transport Customs charge
Source: The Author
237
8.3.2 Route No. 2 Via Bangkok (Thailand)
Table 8.3: Vientiane-Bangkok-Singapore-Rotterdam Day Leg Mode Transit time* Distance
(km) Cost (USD) Confidence
index 1 Vientiane-
Thanaleng Road 1 hour 13 47 3
Thanaleng-NongKhai
Bridge 0.5 hour 4 8 4
NongKhai-Bangkok
Road 1 day 633 315 3
Document Charge 0 50 3 Customs***
Lao side Thai side
0 13 26
2 2
Transit Entry Document
0 5 2
2 Bangkok Port: 1.Container stevedorage 2. Container wharfage 3. Lift on/off charges 4. THC
1 day 0 21 22 17 68
3 3 3 3
B/L charge 0 13 3 Tea money****
Customs Port
0 6.7 14.1
1 1
3 Feeder Connection 1 day 0 - 4 Bangkok-
Singapore 4 days 1,540 230 4
8 Singapore Charges**
0 59 4
9 Singapore tranship 1 day 0 - 4 30 Singapore-
Rotterdam Sea 21 days 15,359 1,270 4
Other Handling Charges**
0 300 3
TOTAL 30/31 days 17,549 2,484.8 2.89 * Assuming no delays ** Include profit *** Personal connections and financial incentives can help increase Customs’ confidence index **** This is the minimum amount required for normal services Source: Compiled from industry sources
As almost all of Lao PDR’s trade has moved from communist countries to the
European Union, North America and ASEAN, the ocean routeing has had to shift
238
from utilising Danang port to Bangkok port. Thailand is a regional hub in its own
right, with daily feeder connections to Singapore.
Route 2 (see routeing map in Appendix D2) is the preferred route by Lao exporters.
Movement of traffic through Thailand between Lao PDR and a third country is
governed by a ‘Transit Transport Agreement’ between the two governments, first
signed in 1978 and renewed annuallyTP
4PT. This provides for forwarding and transport to
be carried out by authorised and certified operators.
The confidence index for this route is slightly higher than for the transit route via
Vietnam at 2.89. This index would have been higher, almost to the “fairly confident”
level if the ‘tea-money’ factor was not included but ‘tea-money’ does add a certain
level of certainty to the cargo flow. Similar to the route via Vietnam, areas of low
confidence are at the border crossing between Lao PDR and Thailand. Offering
financial incentives for speedier and reliable customs processing can again increase
this confidence. Tea money must also be paid at Bangkok port for port related
services. Non-payment will result in disappearance or non-loading of cargo on feeder
ship. Figure 8.4 shows the possible areas where delays might occur from Vientiane to
Bangkok Port. The fastest possible journey is just under 24 hours while the longest
transit time is around 2 to 3 days.
TP
4PT Renewal is automatic unless one of the parties denounces the Agreement.
239
Figure 8.4: Variation in transit time from Vientiane to Bangkok No. of Days
day 3
day 2.5
day 2Bangkok Port
day 1.5 waiting time
day 1Thanaleng-Nongkhai crossing
day 0.5
Vientiane 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Distance (km)
Best case scenarioWorst case scenario
Source: The Author
Most of the problem for transit traffic concerns import cargo where significant delays
occur. There are fewer difficulties for export cargo when compared to the
administrative impediments that may be encountered when transiting through
Vietnam; also the distance from Vientiane to Bangkok (650 km) is shorter than to
Danang (1060 km). The transit time is also much more competitive with only one day
from Vientiane to Bangkok compared to 3 to 4 days (if all the paperwork is in order)
to Danang. The total transport cost via Bangkok to Rotterdam is 2,484.8 USD with a
transit time of 30/31 days. As expected the sea leg is again the dominant mode with
more than 96% of the total journey by sea and represents around 60% of the total
transport cost. Other charges (including Customs) are not as high as on the
Vientiane-Danang route as they only represent a little more than 12% of the total
transport cost (see Figure 8.5).
The delivered price up to Rotterdam will be USD 18216.8 or USD 2.31 per shirt.
Transport cost represents around 15.5% of the delivered goods costs.
240
Figure 8.5: Vientiane-Bangkok-Singapore-Rotterdam (Route 2)
Source: The Author
A closer analysis of the Vientiane-Bangkok leg (see Figure 8.6) reveals that the most
expensive inland leg is from Vientiane to Thanaleng which is the Laotian transit
warehouse cum border post opposite of Nongkhai in Thailand as the freight rate for
this leg is 3.6 USD/km. The border crossing in itself represents 20% of the transport
cost up to Bangkok port with 12% going into document charges and 8% into ‘tea-
money’.
Bangkok port is also quite expensive to use, as the shipper will have to pay a 161.8
USD per container. Terminal handling charges (THCs) represents 42% of the charges
that are incurred at Bangkok port. ‘Tea money’ represents roughly 13% of the local
charges. The Port Authority of Thailand has tried to eradicate ‘tea money’ but was
unsuccessful as workers adopted a ‘go-slow’ attitude resulting in major delay and
congestion in the port area during early 1999. THC has also come under the scrutiny
of the Thai Ministry of Commerce but without much success as liner operators did not
accept the lowering of their THC charge. The shipping lines were arguing that since
the various authorities were not able to stop ‘tea money’, this cost will need to be
included in their THC.
Cost USD
2,5002,2502,0001,750 Rotterdam1,500 Singapore1,2501,000
750500 Bangkok250 Thanaleng
0Vientiane 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000
Distance (km)Road Transport Other handling charges including profitsSea Transport ( Does not include Rotterdam port charges)
241
Figure 8.6: Vientiane-Thanaleng-Nongkhai-Bangkok Cost USD
Tea money650600550500 Port charges450400350300250 Nong Khai Bangkok200150100 Tea money50 Document charges0 Thanaleng
Vientiane 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Distance(km)
Road Transport Source: The Author
242
8.3.3 Route No. 3 Via Laem Chabang (Thailand)
Table 8.4: Vientiane-Laem Chabang-Singapore-Rotterdam Day Leg Mode Transit time* Distance
(km) Cost (USD) Confidence
index 1 Vientiane-
Thanaleng Road 1 hour 13 47 3
Thanaleng-NongKhai
Bridge 0.5 hour 4 8 4
NongKhai-Laem Chabang
Road 1 day 714 362 3
Document Charge
0 50 3
Customs: Lao side Thai side
0 13 26
2 2
Transit Entry Document
0 5 2
2 Laem Chabang Port: 1.Container stevedorage 2. Container wharfage 3. Lift on/off charges 4. THC
1 day 0 21 22 17 68
3 3 3 3
B/L charge 0 13 3 3 Feeder
Connection 1 day 0 - 4
4 Laem Chabang-Singapore
4 days 1,540 230 4
Singapore Charges
0 59 4
9 Tranship waiting time
1 day 0 - 4
30 Singapore-Rotterdam
Sea 21 days 15,359 1,270 4
Other Handling Charges**
0 300 3
TOTAL 30/31 days 17,630 2,511 3.16 *Assuming no delays **Include profit Sources: Compiled from industry sources
243
For cargo that exits through the port of Laem Chabang, the procedures are the same as
for cargo having to go through Bangkok port (see routeing map in Appendix D3).
Nonetheless, this route is marginally more expensive by going through Bangkok at a
total price of 2,511 USD per TEU although there is no difference in the inland transit
time from Vientiane to Laem Chabang (see Figure 8.7).
Figure 8.7: Variation in transit time for Vientiane-Laem Chabang
No. of Days
day 3
day 2.5
day 2 Laem Chabang
day 1.5 waiting time
day 1Thanaleng-Nongkhai crossing
day 0.5
Vientiane 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Distance(km)
Best case scenarioWorst case scenario
Source: The Author
The delivered price up to Rotterdam will be USD 18,243 or USD 2.32 per shirt.
Transport cost represents around 16% of the delivered price of goods upon arrival in
Rotterdam. Figure 8.8 illustrates the total transport cost from Vientiane to Rotterdam
via Laem Chabang.
244
Figure 8.8: Vientiane-Laem Chabang-Singapore-Rotterdam
Source: The Author
The confidence index is higher than going through Bangkok port at 3.16. This is due
to the fact that there is officially no tea money involved at Laem Chabang port.
Crossing the border between Thanaleng (Lao PDR) and Nongkhai (Thailand) is still
the weakest point of the multimodal transport corridor but as soon as the goods are in
Thailand the transport system is reliable enough to warrant it’s rating of “fairly
confident”.
The sea leg of the voyage represents 61% of the total transport cost while road
transport represents 17% of the total transport cost. For the total distance, road
transport is only 4% of the total journey. Other charges are also less significant when
going through Laem Chabang, as there is no tea money (see Figure 8.9).
Laem Chabang is currently the most important deep-sea port in Thailand in terms of
volume. The annual throughput for 1998 was at 1,424,702 TEUs TP
5PT. The reason for
Laem Chabang growth is due to the Thai Government’s policy to divert traffic from
Bangkok port (which is a river port located in the centre on the city) to Laem
Chabang port. The operation of Laem Chabang port is also very different to that of
Bangkok port. Bangkok port is operated by the Port Authorities of Thailand whereas
TP
5PT Containerisation International Yearbook 1999.
Cost USD
2,500 Rotterdam2,2502,0001,7501,5001,250 Singapore1,000
750500 Laem Chabang250 Thanaleng
0Vientiane 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000
Distance (km)Road Transport Other handling charges including profitsSea Transport ( Does not include Rotterdam port charges)
245
Laem Chabang’s operations are under private concessions. These differences in the
management of both ports have been reflected in their working practices, efficiency
and charges.
Laem Chabang as the most important deep-sea port has a daily feeder connection to
Singapore. Main line ships also call at Laem Chabang for the Trans-Pacific trade on a
weekly basis. It is worth noting that there are no mainline ships destined for Europe.
All the cargo for the Middle East and Europe must be transhipped in Singapore first.
When analysing the inland leg from Vientiane to Laem Chabang, the port charges
only represent 20% of the inland transport cost compared to 26% for Bangkok port.
The transit charge between Thanaleng and Nongkhai (including Customs and
document charges) still represents around 17% of the total inland transport cost. The
trucking rate is 13% higher than when going to Bangkok at 362 USD compared to
315 USD but with no real difference in transit time.
Figure 8.9: Vientiane-Thanaleng-Nongkhai-Laem Chabang Cost USD
650600550 B/L charge500 Port charges450400350300 Laem Chabang250 Nong Khai200150100 Tea money50 Document charges
0 ThanalengVientiane 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Distance
(km)Road Transport
Source: The Author
246
8.3.4 Route No. 4 via Lad Krabang (Thailand) Table 8.5: Vientiane-Lad Krabang-Laem Chabang-Singapore-Rotterdam Day Leg Mode Transit time* Distance
(km) Cost (USD) Confidence
index 1 Vientiane-
Thanaleng Road 1 hour 13 47 3
Thanaleng-NongKhai
Bridge 0.5 hour 4 8 4
NongKhai-Lad Krabang
Road 1 day 595 315 3
Document Charge
0 50 3
Customs: Lao Side Thai Side
0 13 26
2 2
Transit Entry Document
0 5 2
2 Lad Krabang ICD: 1.Handling Charge 2.Gate Charge
1 day 13 1.5
4 4
Lad Krabang-Laem Chabang
Rail 113 23 2
Rail transfer charge
0 12 3
B/L charge 0 13 3 Laem Chabang
Port: 1.Container stevedorage 2. Container wharfage 3. Lift on/off charges 4.THC
0 21 22 17 68
3 3 3 3
B/L charge 0 13 3 3 Feeder
Connection 1 day 0 - 4
4 Bangkok-Singapore
4 days 1,540 230 4
8 Singapore Charges**
0 59 4
9 Tranship 1 day 0 - 4 30 Singapore-
Rotterdam Sea 21 days 15,359 1,270 4
Other Handling Charges**
0 300 3
TOTAL 30/31 days 17,624 2,526.5 3.17 *Assuming no delays **Include profit Source: Compiled from industry sources
247
This route is via Lad Krabang which is an Inland Clearance Depot (ICD) located in
the outskirts of Bangkok with a direct rail link to Laem Chabang port (see routeing
map in Appendix D4). An ICD is sometime referred to as a ‘dry port’. According to
Beresford and Dubey (1990) ‘dry ports’ are specific sites to which imports and
exports can be consigned for inspection by Customs and which can be specified as the
origin or destination of goods in transit with documentations such as a multimodal
transport bill of lading (MT B/L). Originally, the term was adopted by the UN to
refer to inland customs facilities in land-locked states, but has since become more
widely used to include similar facilities in maritime countries.
The ICD promotes the concept of multimodal transport, as the consignment can
remain unbroken but at the same time also has far-reaching implications for
infrastructure requirements and transport organisation. It relieves the port storage
problems (Banomyong et al., 1999) but; at the same time, requires a certain minimum
standard of road, rail or waterways connection between the port and the inland depot.
The use of this route is marginally more expensive than the Vientiane direct to Laem
Chabang route, from 2,511 USD/TEU to 2,526.5 USD per TEU. The confidence
index is marginally higher at 3.17. Even though rail transport is not as seen as
reliable as road transport between Lad Krabang and Laem Chabang. This intermodal
link is promoted by the State Railway of Thailand to ease road congestion to Laem
Chabang port but presently the service is not reliable enough, and has diverted a lot of
cargo to go by road between Lad Krabang and Laem Chabang port insteadTP
6PT. Figure
8.10 shows the two nodal links that are most often subject to delays. The first weak
point is the border crossing between Lao PDR and Thailand and the second one is the
intermodal connection with rail transport at Lad Krabang ICD.
TP
6PT Road and rail freight price are very similar, with road being slightly faster.
248
Figure 8.10: Variation in transit time for Vientiane-Lad Krabang-Laem Chabang
Source: The Author
The delivered price up to Rotterdam will be USD 18,258.5 or USD 2.32 per shirt.
Transport cost represents around 16% of the goods costs. The total transit time for
the journey to Rotterdam is the same as for via Bangkok or via Laem Chabang direct.
It is worth noting that the ICD and rail freight only represent 2% of the total transport
cost. The sea leg is still the most important with more than 61% of the total transport
cost and 96% of the total journey (see Figure 8.11).
The capacity of the Lad Krabang ICD is designed to handle 400,000 TEU per annum
with a modal split of 53: 47 between rail and road in 1998. Road transport to Laem
Chabang is possible but emphasis is on the promotion of block train services from
Lad Krabang to Laem Chabang through competitive rates (13 USD/TEU). Currently the
average load factor for the train services is at 78%. Figure 8.12 gives a more precise
indication of the minimal increase in cost when transiting through Lad Krabang ICD
complex, even though there is a modal change in the process. The rail transport cost
curve is almost horizontal when compared to the road transport cost curve.
No. of Days
day 4
day 3.5
day 3
day 2.5 Laem Chabang waiting time
day 2
day 1.5
day 1 Lad Krabang Thanaleng-Nongkhai
day 0.5
Vientiane 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Distance(km)
Best case scenarioWorst case scenario
249
Figure 8.11: Vientiane-Lad Krabang-Laem Chabang-Singapore- Rotterdam
Source: The Author Figure 8.12: Vientiane-Thanaleng-Nongkhai-Lad Krabang-Laem Chabang Cost USD
650600550 Laem Chabang charges500450 Lad Krabang charges400350 Laem Chabang300 Lad Krabang250 Nong Khai200150100 Tea money50 Document charges
0 ThanalengVientiane 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Distance
(km)Road TransportRail Transport
Source: The Author
Cost USD
2,500 Rotterdam2,2502,0001,7501,5001,250 Laem Chabang1,000
750 Singapore500 Lad Krabang250 Thanaleng
0Vientiane 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 Distance
(km)Road Transport Other handling charges including profitsRail Transport ( Does not include Rotterdam port charges)Sea Transport
250
8.3.5 Route No. 5 Via Port Klang (Malaysia)
Table 8.6: Vientiane-Lad Krabang-Port Klang-Rotterdam Day Leg Mode Transit
time* Distance (km)
Cost (USD)
Confidence index
1 Vientiane-Thanaleng
Road 1 hour 13 47 3
Thanaleng-NongKhai
Bridge 0.5 hour 4 8 4
NongKhai-Lad Krabang
Road 1 day 595 315 3
Document Charge
0 50 3
Customs: Lao Side Thai Side
0 13 26
2 2
Transit Entry Document
0 5 2
2 Lad Krabang ICD: 1.Handling Charge 2.Gate Charge 3. THC
1 day 0 13 1.5 68
3 3 3
Lad Krabang-Port Klang
Rail 2.5 day 1,323 380 3
Rail Transfer charge
0 12 3
4.5 Port Klang charges
0 37 4
5.5 Port Klang connection
1 day 0 4
26.5 Port Klang-Rotterdam
Sea 21 14,970 1,200 4
Other charges**
0 300 3
TOTAL 27/28 days 16,905 2,475.5 3.06 * Assuming no delays **Including profit Source: Compiled from industry sources
This route is the most challenging as it has only been in operation since June 1999
(see routeing map in Appendix D5). From the findings, this route seems to be the
most competitive for rate and transit time. The freight rate is at 2,475.5 USD/TEU
with a total transit time of 27/28 days. The confidence index is also quite good at
251
3.06. Even though the rail link between Thailand and Malaysia is quite new, it is now
seen as quite reliable with at least one arrival and departure per day. The confidence
index for rail transport is higher than between Lad Krabang and Laem Chabang
because the trains are not operated by governmental agencies such as the State
Railways of Thailand or KTM of Malaysia but by private concessionaires. Figure
8.13 provides an illustration of the possible variation in transit time when using the
Vientiane-Lad Krabang-Port Klang route. The fastest transit time is 3.5 to 4 days for
the goods to arrive in port Klang.
Figure 8.13: Variation in transit time for Vientiane-Port Klang (Malaysia) No. of Days
day 7
day 6
day 5 Port Klang waiting time
day 4
day 3 Lad Krabang
day 2 Thanaleng-Nongkhai crossing
day 1
Vientiane 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 Distance (km)
Best case scenarioWorst case scenario
Source: The Author
The delivered price up to Rotterdam will be USD 18,207.5 or USD 2.31 per shirt.
Transport cost represents around 15.5% of the goods costs. Figure 8.14 gives a
graphical representation of the freight movement where rail freight represents 15% of
the total transport cost and 8% of the total journey, while the sea leg represents 53%
of the total transport cost and 88% of the total journey. The road transport share of
the total transport cost is still at 15 %, while more than 20% of the total transport cost
is accounted for by other charges.
252
Figure 8.14: Vientiane-Lad Krabang-Port Klang-Rotterdam
Source: The Author
This Lad Krabang-Port Klang land bridge is expected to move 20,700 TEU by the end
of 1999TP
7PT. Each block train has a capacity of 50 TEU per trip and are now running 14
times a week. The shipment leaving Vientiane on Monday will arrive at Lad Krabang
on Tuesday and leave for Port Klang on Wednesday. The actual transit time is just
under 60 hours (~ 2.5 days) from Lad Krabang to Port Klang.
The advantage of the service is that the transit time from port Klang to Lad Krabang
has been shortened compared to between five to 7 days by sea and 4 days by road.
Port Klang may not be as big as Singapore port but is still an important regional hub
port with a throughput of more than 1,813,348 TEU in 1998, and daily connection to
the main European ports. Customs procedures for this land bridge is done at the Lad
Krabang ICD so there is no need for the goods to be cleared at the Malaysian border
of Padang Besar. Malaysian Customs only verify that the Thai Customs seals have
not been tampered with and they will add their own seal on each container.
TP
7PT The Star Maritime, September 6, 1999.
Cost USD
2,5002,250 Rotterdam2,0001,7501,5001,250 Port Klang1,000
750500 Lad Krabang250 Thanaleng
0Vientiane 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000
Distance (km)Road Transport Other handling charges including profitsRail Transport ( Does not include Rotterdam port charges)Sea Transport
253
It is Malaysia’s policy to promote port Klang as a regional load-centre and
transhipment hub in order to compete with Singapore. This is done by offering
special rates for cargo that transit through port Klang, from 50 USD/TEU for cargo
originating from Malaysia to 37 USD for third country cargo. Free storage up to 28
days is also provided for transit cargo.
Figure 8.15 represents the inland transport cost up to port Klang. The steepness of the
rail transport curve is noticeably less than the road transport curve, reflecting the cost-
effectiveness of rail over the long haul route.
Figure 8.15: Vientiane-Thanaleng-Nongkhai-Lad Krabang-Port Klang Cost USD
Port Klang charges750700650600 Port Klang550 Lad Krabang charges500450400350300 Lad Krabang250 Nong Khai200150100 Tea money50 Document charges
0 ThanalengVientiane 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000
Distance (km)Road TransportRail Transport
Source: The Author
254
8.3.6 Garment export routeing summary
Of all the alternative journeys between Vientiane and Rotterdam, the option via Port
Klang achieves the most competitive costs and transit time with a reasonable
confidence index (see Table 8.7).
Table 8.7: Total transport costs, transit time and confidence index
Route Total Transport Cost (USD)
Total Transit Time (days)
Confidence index
1 Via Danang (Vietnam) 3,420 31/32 2.7 2 Via Bangkok (Thailand) 2,484.8 30/31 2.89 3 Via Laem Chabang (Thailand)
2,511 30/31 3.16
4 Via Lad Krabang (Thailand) 2,526.5 30/31 3.17 5 Via Port Klang (Malaysia) 2,475.5 27/28 3.06 Source: The Author
It must be noted that in reality, sea freight rates are not stable and are adjusted for
‘peak season’ surcharge, or other type of surcharges which may increase the freight
rates compared to those obtained during this study. The ICDs in Lad Krabang also
achieve significantly lower container handling costs than port terminals. According to
Beresford & Savides (1997), this difference probably occurs because maritime
terminals have more sophisticated handling equipment and more complex
infrastructure than inland multimodal terminals.
Currently, Laotian exporters to Europe are not fully aware of the multimodal
alternatives that are offered to them via Thailand. This ought be due to the fact that
most of these garment exporters prefer to sell their product FOB Thanaleng or FOB
Bangkok thus not controlling the transport chain. If Laotian exporters want to benefit
from the various route options that are offered to them, then they will have to
negotiate their international trade under ‘delivered’ trade terms. These ‘delivered’
trade terms will assist in the control of the transport chain, as Laotian exporters will
be able to nominate the main carriers and choose the most suitable route.
255
When comparing the costs involved in these routes, sea transport is as expected the
cheapest per cost/km, rail is intermediate and road transport is the most expensive
(see Table 8.8). It is also worth noting that the various other charges are still a burden
to the competitiveness of Laotian exports. On certain routes, such as via Bangkok,
transit and local charges represent up to 10% of the total transport cost, with ‘tea
money ‘ representing 2%. The figure might not be very high, but this 2% do
represent a loss in terms of the Laotian trade competitiveness.
Table 8.8: Cost of freight/km by modes of transport with confidence index
Route Mode Cost/km (USD) Confidence index 1: Vientiane-Danang Road 0.7 1 Danang-Singapore Sea (feeder) 0.21 3 Singapore-Rotterdam Sea (main) 0.08 4 2: Vientiane-Bangkok Road 0.55 3 Bangkok-Singapore Sea (feeder) 0.15 4 Singapore-Rotterdam Sea (main) 0.08 4 3: Vientiane-Laem Chabang Road 0.55 3 Laem Chabang-Singapore Sea (feeder) 0.15 4 Singapore-Rotterdam Sea (main) 0.08 4 4: Vientiane-Lad Krabang Road 0.59 3 Lad Krabang-Laem Chabang
Rail 0.2 2
Laem Chabang-Singapore Sea (feeder) 0.15 4 Singapore-Rotterdam Sea (main) 0.08 4 5: Vientiane-Lad Krabang Road 0.59 3 Lad Krabang-Port Klang Rail 0.28 3 Port Klang-Rotterdam Sea (main) 0.08 4 Source: The Author
Part A has demonstrated that the best possible route for Laotian garment exporters to
Europe is via Port Klang in Malaysia, both on total transport costs and transit time.
Table 8.9 summarises the transport cost per shirt according to the alternative routeing.
Route 2 and 5 have the same transport cost but route 5 has a faster transit time with a
higher confidence index.
256
Table 8.9: Cost of transport (per shirt) to Rotterdam
Route Cost of shirt
Cost of transport per
shirt
Total cost (shirt & transport)
1 Via Danang USD2 USD 0.43 USD 2.43 2 Via Bangkok USD 2 USD 0.31 USD 2.31 3 Via Laem Chabang USD 2 USD 0.32 USD 2.32 4 Via Lad Krabang USD 2 USD 0.32 USD 2.32 5 Via Port Klang USD 2 USD 0.31 USD 2.31 Source: The Author
A closer analysis of transport cost per shirt reveals that the highest transport costs is
via Danang in Vietnam with USD 0.43 per shirt. The four other routeing alternatives
achieve very similar transport costs. Route 2 via Bangkok in Thailand with
transhipment through Singapore and Route 5 via Port Klang in Malaysia achieve the
same transport costs even though there are intermodal transfers at Lad Krabang ICD
and Port Klang in Malaysia with the use of rail transport. The cost of transport for
Route 2 and Route 5 is at USD 0.31 per shirt. Route 3 and Route 4 has the same
transport cost per shirt at USD 0.32 but the Route 4 include intermodal transfers at
Lad Krabang ICD (Thailand) and Laem Chabang port with the use of rail transport.
It is interesting to note that the prices for Route 2 to Route 5 are almost the same
(there is a USD 0.01 difference) and that the decision-making relating to routeing will
not only be based on costs but also on the transit time offered and the confidence
index that each multimodal transport corridor achieve. These findings suggest that no
matter the export routeing alternative (apart via Vietnam) chosen there is almost no
difference in the multimodal transport corridors in terms of price.
257
PART B: WINE IMPORT ROUTEING
Cargo description: 1 x 20 foot container stuffed with 23 pallets containing 600 bottles
of wine each (or 13,800 bottles), weighting 16,560 kg. The container was
consolidated at the port of Marseilles. It is assumed that the wine was bought FOB
Marseilles at USD 39,000 per TEU or USD 2.83 per bottle (this is the average value
per bottle).
Existing alternative routes and modal combinations for the movement of unitised
freight between the port of Marseilles and Vientiane are summarised here below in
table 8.10.
Table 8.10 Routeing alternatives for freight, Marseilles (France)-Lao PDR
Route
Origin: France
Mode Tranship Mode Transhipment/Intermodal transfer
Mode Destination: Lao PDR
6 Marseilles Sea Singapore Sea Danang (Vietnam)
Road Vientiane
7 Marseilles Sea Singapore Sea Bangkok (Thailand)
Road Vientiane
8 Marseilles Sea Singapore Sea Laem Chabang (Thailand)
Road Vientiane
9 Marseilles Sea Singapore Sea Laem Chabang & Lad Krabang (Thailand)
Rail & Road
Vientiane
10 Marseilles Sea Port Klang (Malaysia)
Rail Lad Krabang (Thailand)
Road Vientiane
Source: Compiled from industry sources
258
8.3.7 Route No. 6 Via Danang (Vietnam)
Table 8.11: Marseilles-Singapore-Danang-Vientiane
Day Leg Mode Transit time*
Distance (km)
Cost (USD)
Confidence Index
1 Marseilles-Singapore
Sea 18 days 12,092 600 4
Singapore charges
0 59 4
19 Singapore tranship
2 to 3 days 0 - 4
22 Singapore-Danang
Sea 4 days 1,910 400 3
Danang charges
0 20 3
THC 0 1 Lao Bao-
Houey Khaki Customs
2-3 hours 0 220 1***
26 Danang-Thanaleng
Road 3 days 1,047 750 1
29 Thanaleng Customs post
3 to 5 days 2.5***
Thanaleng-Vientiane
1 hour 13 47 3
Other Handling Charges**
0 700 2
TOTAL 32/34 days 15,062 2,797 2.75 *Assuming no delays **Include profit and Thanaleng customs post charges ***This confidence rating may be improve with the offer of financial incentives Source: Compiled from industry sources
Route No. 6 via Vietnam is essentially the same as Route 1, especially for the feeder
connection and the inland leg (see routeing map in Appendix D6). The main
difference is that the port of origin is Marseilles port and that the goods are moving
into Vientiane in Lao PDR. The total transit time for this route is between 32/34
days. The main sea leg from Marseilles to Singapore represents around 51% of the
total transit time while at the same time representing 80% of the total distance from
Marseilles to Vientiane. This transit time is only valid if no delays occur while
259
transiting through Vietnam. If there are delays, then the inland leg from Danang to
Vientiane can represent up to 35% of the new transit time of 46/48 days TP
8PT. According
to industry sources, these delays are usually between 10 days to 2 weeks but a delay
of up to a month is not uncommon. Figure 8.16 illustrates the situation with regards
to variation in transit time from Danang to Vientiane. Due to the nature of the
imported goods, after crossing the Lao Bao-Houey Khaki border, the goods must first
go to Thanaleng Custom’s post (near Vientiane) where it will take usually 3 to 5 days
for the process of import clearance if all the documents are in order. While waiting
for the import clearance, the owner of the goods is charged USD 10/TEU per day for
storage. He will also be charged for the un-stuffing of the container in the compound
at USD 30/TEU. This fee includes the transfer of the goods on local trucks for the
final journey to the importer’s warehouse in Vientiane. More than USD 60 is paid to
facilitate the routeing of documents while processing import clearance to Customs
officers, stevedores, etc.TP
9PT. After customs clearance, a gift is also expected from the
owner of the goods such as a few bottles of wines to Customs officers in charge of
checking and valuating the goods.
Figure 8.16: Variation in transit time from Danang to Vientiane
No. of Days14131211109 Thanaleng Customs post87 possible delay Lao Bao/Houey Khaki6 Border crossing54321
Danang 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000Best case scenario Distance (km)Worst case scenario
Source: The Author
The main sea leg from Marseilles to Singapore and the feeder connection is felt as
quite reliable by the respondents with an average confidence index of 3.75. This
TP
8PT Instead of representing around 10% of the total transit time in case of no delays (32/34 days).
260
means that the goods will arrive at Danang usually within 24 days. The delays will
most probably occur when the goods arrive at Danang port. Before the goods can
move out of the port of arrival all the documents and transit permit must be in order.
The procedure for import cargo is similar to the procedure for export cargo. When all
the documents are ready, the goods can then move out of Danang port. The border
crossing at Lao Bao-Houey Khaki is not seen as a problem as most of the formalities
will have been completed in Danang for transit cargo. Vietnamese customs officers
will usually escort the cargo up to the border. The confidence index for the inland leg
is very low at 1; this is considered the main problem area when transiting via Vietnam
with poor infrastructure, bureaucracy and pilferage identified as the main sources of
low confidence.
Many Lao traders and logistics/transport service providers do not trust Vietnamese
and Lao bureaucratic administration. This is a general feeling that has been reflected
when these two countries were given a D rating for anti-corruption by Asiaweek TP
10PT.
The confidence index for the whole route is 2.75 but only because the people
interviewed felt confident about the sea leg as the least likely to create problems.
The total transport cost from Marseilles to Vientiane is USD 2,797. The main sea leg
from Marseilles to Singapore is very competitive at around USD 600 per TEU. This
is because during the period of the research, there was a strong imbalance of
containers' movement out of the Far East. All the shipping lines had to reposition
their containers in the Far East to service the surge in exports due to the regional
currency depreciation that followed the regional economic crisis. Another effect of
the Asian economic crisis was that many countries almost stopped importing goods
from Europe and North America thus hindering the movement of containers to the Far
East. When taken into consideration, these two factors contributed to the very low
freight rates offered by shipping lines. Some freight was considered better than
moving empty containers at lost.
TP
9PT Gifts of similar value are also accepted
TP
10PT “How Asia is governed”, in: Asiaweek, August 18-25, 2000, pp. 52-53.
261
Figure 8.17 shows the cost curve from Marseilles to Vientiane. It is interesting to
note that the freight charges from Marseilles to Singapore only represent 21% of the
total transport cost with a cost of USD 0.05 per TEU/km. The freight charge by
feeder vessel represents up to 15% of the total transport cost with a cost of USD 0.21
per TEU/km, while the distance from Singapore to Danang is only 12% of the total
distance. The inland leg cost takes up more than 61% of the total transport cost.
These ratios are well represented in the model, especially when assessing the
steepness of the curve for each mode and means of transport.
Figure 8.17: Marseilles-Singapore-Danang-Vientiane (Route 6) Costs USD
2,7502,5002,250 Vientiane2,0001,7501,500 Danang1,2501,000 Singapore
750500250
0Marseilles 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000
Distance (km)Sea transport Road transport
Source: The Author
The inland leg from Danang to Vientiane is represented graphically in Figure 8.18
here below. The y-axis begins at USD 1,000 because when the goods arrive at
Danang port, the transport cost already adds up to USD 1,059 per TEU. Due of the
various uncertainties from Danang to Vientiane, the other handling charges (which
includes profit) comprise 41% of the inland transport cost. The Customs charge
represents 13% of the inland transport leg. Compared to the distance, the inland leg is
the most expensive leg of the whole journey at a cost of USD 1,738 for 1,060 km or
USD 1.63 per km.
Figure 8.18: Danang-Houey Khaki-Lao Bao-Vientiane
262
Cost USD
2,8002,6002,400 Other handling2,200 Charges2,0001,800 Lao Bao Customs1,6001,4001,200 Houey Kaki Customs1,000
Danang 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 Distance (km)
Road transport Customs charge Source: The Author
According to Lao importers, this route is almost never used. It is mostly used for
government cargo or certain project cargo to the South of the country near
Savannakhet province. Private importers are afraid of pilferage and the uncertainties
of transiting through Vietnam. In practice, when wine is imported in Lao PDR, this
route is never taken. If this route is chosen, the delivered price up to Vientiane will
be USD 41,797 or USD 3.03 per bottle. Transport cost will, therefore, represent
around 7% of the value of the wine “delivered” to Vientiane.
263
8.3.8 Route No. 7 Via Bangkok (Thailand)
Table 8.12: Marseilles-Singapore-Bangkok-Vientiane
Day Leg Mode Transit time*
Distance (km)
Cost (USD)
Confidence Index
1 Marseilles-Singapore
Sea 18 days 12,092 600 4
Singapore charges
0 59 4
19 Singapore tranship
1 day 0 - 4
20 Singapore-Bangkok
Sea 3 to 4 days 1,540 200 4
24 Bangkok charges**
148.8*** 2.3****
B/L charge 13 3 Lao transit
documents 2 to 3 days 12.5 2
Bangkok-Nongkhai
Road 1 day 633 1,500 3
28 Nongkhai-Thanaleng
Bridge 0.5 hour 4 8 4
Transit Customs charge****
39 2
Thanaleng Customs post
3 to 5 days 2.5****
Thanaleng-Nongkhai
Road 1 hour 13 47 3
Other Handling charges*****
300 3
TOTAL 31/33 days 14,282 2,927.3 3.13 * Assuming no delays ** For a breakdown of charges at Bangkok port please refer to Table 8.3 *** Including the usual amount of tea-money to Customs and port officers **** Personal connection and financial incentives can increase confidence index ***** Include profit and Thanaleng customs post charges Source: Compiled from industry sources
Route 7 (see routeing map in Appendix D7), via Bangkok (Thailand), is the preferred
transit route for import cargo into Lao PDR with a confidence index of 3.13. Upon
264
vessel arrival in Bangkok port, the goods will be transferred to a dedicated warehouse
for transit cargo destined for Lao PDR. This dedicated warehouse is in the vicinity of
Bangkok port just opposite of the Customs Department. Import procedures must be
cleared before the goods are moved to the dedicated warehouse. In Thailand, import
procedures are very cumbersome, even for cargo destined for the local Thai market.
Table 8.13 summarises the average amount of time required for the release of
imported goods (be it for transit or local consumption).
Table 8.13 Average time required for import clearance & release of goods
Day Activities Customs Average Time (Hours)
Percentage
1 2 3 4 5
-Preparation of documents for import clearance
-Customs formalities & duty assessment
118.62 1.7
60.68 0.87
6 -Preparation of document for payment of duty
-Payment of duty
40.65 0.16
20.80 0.09
7 -Preparation for goods examination -Port Authority release goods
-Manifest examination -Release of goods
20.25 0.17 2.16 0.5
10.36 0.09 1.10 0.26
8 -Preparing for goods to move out of port
-Check post
11.13 0.09
5.69 0.06
TOTAL 195.43* 100% * Or 8.1 days Source: Adapted from Thai Chamber of Commerce (1999)
The time taken by document preparation has the highest ratio of the total time for the
release of imported goods. After the goods are release from Bangkok port they will
be moved to the dedicated warehouse for transit cargo where the goods will have to
stay at least 2 to 3 days while waiting for consular documents from the Lao Embassy
in Bangkok. The purpose of these documents is to check that the goods imported are
really destined for Lao PDR. A major problem with going through Bangkok is that
Thai Customs open all containers in transit to check if the goods are in conformity
265
with the packing list. Many Lao importers have complained about this practice but to
no avail as Thai Customs claim that they need to verify all Lao cargo. One
interviewed Lao wine merchant, has a very strong suspicion that the real reason for
these checks is to pilfer a few of his wine bottles, as the numbers are always short
compared to the packing list when the container is opened in Thanaleng.
If there are no major delays, the usual total transit time for this route is around 31 to
33 days. According to Lao importers, the fastest transit time that has been done is 28
days while it is not unusual to wait up to 45 days. The transit time will depend a lot
on the information provided in invoices, packing lists, insurance certificate, etc. The
main sea leg and feeder connection are considered the most reliable component of the
route with a combined confidence index of 4. Figure 8.19 illustrates the possible
variations in transit time from Bangkok to Vientiane.
Figure 8.19 Variation in transit time from Bangkok to Vientiane No. of Days
1413121110
98 Thanaleng7654321
Bangkok 100 200 300 400 500 600 700Best case scenario Distance (km)Worst case scenario
Source: The Author
The total transport cost via Bangkok is around a little more than USD 100 higher than
via Danang at USD 2,927.3. The sea transport cost only represents 30% of the total
transport cost. The most expensive transport cost is road transport at USD 1,500 from
Bangkok to Thanaleng or USD 2.37/TEU per km. The rate is expensive because all
266
the trucks going to Thanaleng must come back into Thailand emptyTP
11PT. These trucks
can wait in Nongkhai, on the Thai side, but with such low export volumes from Lao
PDR the majority of trucks go back immediately. Many Lao government officials
believe that the freight rate for Bangkok-Thanaleng is artificially inflated because
there is no competition. The problem lies more with the extreme imbalance of Lao
PDR foreign trade, as trucking companies when servicing Lao trade have to include
the freight charges for an empty return. Other types of charges take up to 20% of the
total transport cost with charges at Bangkok port representing 5% of the total
transport cost.
Figure 8.20 illustrates the transport cost from Marseilles to Vientiane via Bangkok
where the road transport curve is almost vertical due to the high freight rate. Figure
8.21 represents the cost increase during the inland leg from Bangkok to Vientiane.
Figure 8.20: Marseilles-Singapore-Bangkok-Vientiane (Route 7) Costs USD Vientiane
Thanaleng2,7502,5002,250 Nongkhai2,0001,7501,5001,250 Bangkok1,000 Singapore
750500250
0Marseilles 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000
Distance (km)Sea transport Road transport
Source: The Author
Figure 8.21: Bangkok-Nongkhai-Thanaleng-Vientiane
TP
11PT Except if these trucks belong to the transit traffic franchisees such as the ETO, Ubonsahatham, RCL,
TL Enterprise, the SRT, and have return freight.
267
Cost USD
3,000 Vientiane2,800 Thanaleng2,6002,4002,2002,0001,800 Nongkhai1,6001,4001,2001,000
Bangkok 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Distance (km)
Road transport Source: The Author
When selecting the route via Bangkok, the delivered price up to Vientiane will be
USD 41,927.3 per TEU or USD 3.04 per bottle. The transport cost represents around
7.5% of the goods costs. The transport price increase for this route is marginal if
compared to the route via Vietnam at only USD 0.01 increases per bottle.
268
8.3.9 Route No. 8 Via Laem Chabang (Thailand)
Table 8.14: Marseilles-Singapore-Laem Chabang-Vientiane
Day Leg Mode Transit time*
Distance (km)
Cost (USD)
Confidence Index
1 Marseilles-Singapore
Sea 18 days 12,092 600 4
Singapore charges
0 59 4
19 Singapore tranship
1 day 0 - 4
20 Singapore-Laem Chabang
Sea 3 to 4 days 1,540 200 4
24 Laem Chabang charges
128** 3
B/L charge 13 3 Lao transit
documents 2 to 3 days 12.5 2
Laem Chabang-Nongkhai
Road 1 day 714 1,500 3
28 Nongkhai-Thanaleng
Bridge 0.5 hour 4 8 4
Transit Customs charge
39 2***
Thanaleng Customs post
3 to 5 days 2.5***
NongKhai-Vientiane
Road 1 hour 13 47 3
Other Handling charges****
300 3
TOTAL 31/33 days 14,363 2,906.5 3.19 *Assuming no delays ** For a breakdown of cost at Laem Chabang port please refer to Table 8.4 *** Personal connection and financial incentives can increase confidence index ****Include profit and Thanaleng customs post charges Source: Compiled from industry sources
269
Route 8 is via Thailand’s major deep-sea port Laem Chabang (see routeing map in
Appendix D8). This route has a slightly higher confidence index than via Bangkok
port as Laem Chabang port is seen as a “graft free” port. This is reflected with a
confidence rating for the whole journey of 3.19. The same administrative problems
are in existence for import or transit via this route.
The only difference in transit time with the route via Bangkok will depend on how
long the goods will be waiting for their consular documents from the Lao embassy in
Bangkok. If the goods, upon arrival at Laem Chabang port are not cleared for transit
to Lao PDR, within 2 days, then the goods will have to be moved under Thai Customs
escort to the dedicated warehouse for Lao transit cargo in the vicinity of Bangkok
port TP
12PT. The transport of the containers from Laem Chabang to Bangkok port is quoted
at around USD 40 per TEU TP
13PT. The transit time from Laem Chabang to Bangkok port
is 2 hours. There the cargo will wait for the consular documents for transit to Lao
PDR. This dedicated transit warehouse also offers 7 days free storage instead of the
usual 3 free storage days at Bangkok port or Laem Chabang port. It is often not worth
the risk for goods to be stranded at Laem Chabang port due to the possible delays
involved
Figure 8.22 illustrates graphically the possible variation in transit time from Laem
Chabang to Vientiane. The best-case scenario means that goods will arrive for import
Customs clearance in Thanaleng within 3 days while the worst scenario also includes
delays in the Lao transit warehouse in Bangkok. In the worst case, it can take two
weeks before the goods arrive at destination in Vientiane from Laem Chabang even
though the journey only represents 5% of the total distance. If this situation happens,
it will take between 37 to 40 days for the goods to arrive from Marseilles to
Vientiane.
TP
12PT In the early 1990s, transit procedures was even more restrictive with all Lao bound cargo upon
arrival, in Thailand, transferred immediately to the dedicated transit warehouse no matter the port of arrival. All these transfers were made under Thai Customs escort. Only project cargo were exempt from that restriction TP
13PT This eventuality is included in the Other Handling Charges.
270
Figure 8.22 Variation in transit time from Laem Chabang to Vientiane No. of Days
1413121110 Vientiane
9876 Bangkok5 Thanaleng4321
Laem Chabang 100 200 300 400 500 600 700Best case scenario Distance (km)Worst case scenario
Source: The Author
The total transport cost for this route is USD 2,906.5 per TEU, which is marginally
lower than through Bangkok port. This is because tea-money is not paid at the port of
arrival. Lao importers still prefer the route via Bangkok as storage charges can be
better controlled (7 free days) and rectification of Lao consular documents can be
made more easily because of the proximity of the Lao embassy. For project cargo,
Laem Chabang is the preferred port of arrival as the cargo will be able to bypass
Bangkok and its notorious congestion problems. The transport cost from Laem
Chabang to Nongkhai is the same as from Bangkok to Nongkhai even though the
distance is slightly longer at 714 km. This also means that the transport cost per km is
cheaper at USD 2.1/TEU. Route 7 (via Bangkok) and route 8 (Via Laem Chabang)
are almost identical both in terms of transit time and transport cost. It is only when
delays occur during the voyage that Bangkok port seems to be a better option.
Lao traders may feel more confident about using the facilities at Laem Chabang port
than Bangkok port but due to the difficulty in document processing for import and
transit cargo they prefer to import via Bangkok. The infrastructure “ hardware” might
be better at Laem Chabang but the “software” problem solving capabilities are more
271
efficient in Bangkok. Figure 8.23 and Figure 8.24 represents the total cost of
transport from Marseilles to Vientiane and the inland leg from Laem Chabang to
Vientiane respectively. The delivered price up to Vientiane will be USD 49,906.5 per
TEU or 3.03 per bottle. The transport costs up to Vientiane takes around 7.45% of the
wine costs. The inland road transport is still the most expensive leg of the journey
compared to the sea voyage.
Figure 8.23: Marseilles-Singapore-Laem Chabang-Vientiane (Route 8) Costs USD Vientiane
Thanaleng2,7502,5002,250 Nongkhai2,0001,7501,5001,250 Laem Chabang1,000 Singapore
750500250
0Marseilles 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000
Distance (km)Sea transport Road transport
Source: The Author
Figure 8.24: Laem Chabang-Nongkhai-Thanaleng-Vientiane Cost USD
Vientiane3,0002,800 Thanaleng2,6002,4002,2002,0001,800 Nongkhai1,6001,4001,2001,000
Laem Chabang 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Distance (km)
Road transport Source: The Author
272
8.3.10 Route No. 9 Via Laem Chabang & Lad Krabang (Thailand)
Table 8.15: Marseilles-Singapore-Laem Chabang-Lad Krabang-Vientiane Day Leg Mode Transit
time* Distance (km)
Cost (USD)
Confidence Index
1 Marseilles-Singapore
Sea 18 days 12,092 600 4
Singapore charges
0 59 4
19 Singapore tranship
1 day 0 - 4
20 Singapore-Laem Chabang
Sea 3 to 4 days 1,540 200 4
24 Laem Chabang charges**
128* 3
B/L charge 13 3 Lao transit
documents 2 to 3 days 12.5 2
Laem Chabang-Lad Krabang
Rail 3 hours 113 23 2
Rail transfer charges
12 3
Lad Krabang ICD charges**
1 day 14.5 4
Lad Krabang-Nongkhai
Road 1 day 595 1,500 3
28 Nongkhai-Thanaleng
Bridge 0.5 hour 4 8 4
Transit Customs charge
39 2***
Thanaleng Customs post
3 to 5 days 2.5****
Thanaleng-Vientiane
Road 1 hour 13 47 3
Other Handling charges****
300 3
TOTAL 33/35 days 14,357 2,956 3.15 * Assuming no delays ** For a breakdown of cost at Laem Chabang port and Lad Krabang ICD please refer
to Table 8.5 *** Personal connection and financial incentives can increase confidence index **** Include profit and Thanaleng customs post charges Source: Compiled from industry sources
273
Route No. 9 (see routeing map in Appendix D9) via Laem Chabang and Lad Krabang
is theoretically possible but Laotian importers have never used it. This route has a
total confidence index of 3.15, which is in the same range as the other routes via
Thailand. The transport cost is also the highest at USD 2,956 per TEU but it must not
be forgotten that at least three intermodal transfers had occurred before arrival in
Vientiane: from the goods being unloaded off the feeder vessel, to the train, and then
on to the truck for the journey into Lao PDR. An increase of USD 50 for using
another mode of transport does not affect the total transport cost significantly,
especially for this type of medium to high value commodity.
The main drawback for this route, apart from the usual cumbersome import and transit
procedures in Thailand, is the delays while waiting for inland intermodal connection
to occur. It may take 3 hours for the train to complete the journey from Laem
Chabang to Lad Krabang but the State Railway of Thailand is not renown for its
punctuality and conformance to its published schedule. This is why the rail
connection from Laem Chabang to Lad Krabang was only given a confidence index
of 2. As a precaution, the majority of logistics operators in Lad Krabang also rely on
trucking companies to transport their cargo to Lad Krabang ICD. When questioned,
these logistics operators were willing to assign a confidence rating of 3 to the trucking
service serving the Laem Chabang-Lad Krabang route. Containers that are destined
for Lad Krabang ICD do not have to be checked at Laem Chabang port if their seals
are intact upon arrival. After arriving at Lad Krabang ICD, the goods will have to be
checked and verified by Thai Customs before being release for the journey to Lao
PDR. These procedures usually take at least 1 working day to complete.
In a theoretical “nightmare” scenario, where the documentation is not ready or
missing, the goods will have to be transferred to the dedicated transit warehouse near
Bangkok Port under Customs escort at a cost of around USD 40 to USD 50 per TEU
to wait for the transit documents. Under this scenario, the total transit time can take
up between 45 to 50 days for the goods to arrive at the final destination.
274
Figure 8.25 describes the possible variation in transit time from Laem Chabang to
Vientiane via Lad Krabang. In the best-case scenario, the wine will arrive for import
clearance at Thanaleng within 5 days and may be at the importer’s warehouse within
8 days. In the worst case, it can take 8 to 9 days for the goods to arrive at Thanaleng
even though the distance from Lad Krabang to Thanaleng only represents 4% of the
total distance from Marseilles to Vientiane.
Figure 8.25 Variation in transit time from Lad Krabang to Vientiane No. of Days
1413121110 Vientiane
98 Thanaleng7654321 Lad Krabang
Laem Chabang 100 200 300 400 500 600 700Best case scenario Distance (km)Worst case scenario
Source: The Author
The marginal increase in transport cost can make this route attractive to Lao importers
if the confidence index was higher than for the other alternative routes via Thailand or
Vietnam. The transit time is also longer by a couple of days, even in the best-case
scenario. According to the Lao importers interviewed, transiting through Lad
Krabang ICD might be a possibility if the intermodal connection from Laem Chabang
is efficient and reliable but also if they had more knowledge and information about
the types of services offered in an ICDTP
14PT.
Figure 8.26 and Figure 8.27 are graphic illustrations of the total cost of the goods
transported from Marseilles to Vientiane and the inland leg from Laem Chabang via
Lad Krabang to Vientiane respectively. The rail transport curve steepness is almost
275
horizontal while the road transport curve is almost vertical. Road transport is still the
most expensive mode of transport no matter the distance covered. Rail transport cost
only stand for 1.5% of the inland transport cost or 0.9% of the total transport cost
while constituting 15.5% of the inland distance from Laem Chabang to Vientiane.
The delivered price up to Vientiane will be USD 41,956 per TEU or USD 3.04 per
bottle. The transport cost from Marseilles to Vientiane, if the route via Lad Krabang
is used, will correspond to 7% of the total cost of goods upon arrival in Vientiane.
Figure 8.26: Marseilles-Singapore-Laem Chabang-Lad Krabang-Vientiane (Route 9)
Costs USD VientianeThanaleng
2,7502,5002,250 Nongkhai2,0001,750 Lad Krabang1,5001,250 Laem Chabang1,000 Singapore
750500250
0Marseilles 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000
Distance (km)Sea transport Rail transport Road transport
Source: The Author
TP
14PT Some Lao exporters were also unaware of the ICD concept and functions.
276
Figure 8.27: Laem Chabang-Lad Krabang-Nongkhai-Vientiane
Cost USDVientiane
3,0002,800 Thanaleng2,6002,4002,2002,0001,800 Nongkhai1,6001,4001,200 Lad Krabang1,000
Laem Chabang 100 200 300 400 500 600 700Rail transport Road transport Distance (km)
Source: The Author
277
8.3.11 Route No. 10 Via Port Klang (Malaysia) & Lad Krabang (Thailand)
Table 8.16: Marseilles-Port Klang-Lad Krabang-Vientiane
Day Leg Mode Transit time*
Distance (km)
Cost (USD)
Confidence Index
1 Marseilles-Port Klang
Sea 15 days 11,703 550 4
Port Klang charges
0 37 4
16 Port Klang - transload
1 day 0 - 4
17 Port Klang-Lad Krabang
Rail 2.5 days 1,323 380 3
Lao transit documents
2 to 3 days 12.5 2
Rail transfer charges
12 3
23 Lad Krabang ICD charges**
1 day 14.5 4
Lad Krabang-Nongkhai
Road 1 day 595 1,500 3
25 Nongkhai-Thanaleng
Bridge 0.5 hour 4 8 4
Transit Customs charge
39 2***
Thanaleng Customs post
3 to 5 days 2.5****
Thanaleng-Vientiane
Road 1 hour 13 47 3
Other Handling charges****
300 3
TOTAL 28/30 13,638 2,900 3.13 * Assuming no delays ** For a breakdown of cost at Laem Chabang port and Lad Krabang ICD please refer
to Table 8.5 *** Personal connection and financial incentives can increase confidence index **** Include profit and Thanaleng customs post charges Source: Compiled from industry sources
278
Route No. 10 (see routeing map in Appendix D10) via Port Klang in Malaysia is the
fastest route that is available to Lao importers with a total transit time of 28 to 30 days
for the goods to arrive in Vientiane. This route has also the shortest distance at
13,638 km with rail transport taking up to 10% of the total distance. This is due to the
fact that the Strait of Malacca has been bypassed by using a land bridge from Port
Klang to Lad Krabang ICD. There is no need to tranship in Singapore to a feeder
vessel. The confidence index is also consistent with the routes via Thailand at 3.13.
The rail confidence index is also higher than for the Laem Chabang-Lad Krabang
route at 3. This relatively high confidence in international rail transport (compared to
local rail transport in Thailand) is partly due to the fact the Port Klang-Bangkok-Lad
Krabang route is operated by private operators.
One of the main advantages of using this route is the incentive offered by Port Klang
for transit cargo. Transit cargo can remain free of charge 28 days in Port Klang and
the port charges are less than at Singapore at USD 37. Another incentive is the transit
time for rail transport of 2.5 days, which is also a lot faster than the usual 7 to 8 days
from Port Klang to Lad Krabang by sea. While the goods are on the train, the Lao
importer or his agent can apply for Lao transit documents in Bangkok at the Lao
embassy and if there are no delays the goods can then move within 2 to 3 days to Lao
PDR after arrival at Lad Krabang.
Figure 8.28 describes the possible variations in transit time from Port Klang to
Vientiane via Lad Krabang. In the best-case scenario, the goods can arrive at
Thanaleng within 7 days of arrival in Port Klang. This means that the journey from
Marseilles to Thanaleng would have taken only 25 days. In the worst-case scenario, it
can take up to more than 2 weeks for the goods to be delivered to the importer’s
warehouse. The rail transit time stands for 9% of the total transit time while road
only represents 3.5%. Sea transport has the highest ratio with 53%. Other types of
related activities take up to 34.5% with transit and import procedures representing at
least 18% of the total transit time.
279
Figure 8.28 Variation in transit time from Port Klang to Vientiane No. of Days
141312 Thanaleng Vientiane1110
9876 Lad Krabang54321
Klang 300 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100Best case scenario Distance (km)Worst case scenario
Source: The Author
Route No. 10 via Port Klang is slightly cheaper than routes using Bangkok port or
Laem Chabang port in Thailand at USD 2,900 per TEU. Lao importers and
logistics/transport service providers have shown a great interest in this particular
route. The cost of this route is competitive, the confidence index is reasonable and
more importantly its the transit time is the fastest available for imports from Europe.
This interest is consistent with the findings related to international freight transport
practices in Lao PDR where transit time is ranked as the most important factor in
attitudes towards the selection of transport modeTP
15PT.
Figure 8.29 and Figure 8.30 represents the total cost for the transport of wine from
Marseilles via Port Klang to Vientiane and the inland leg from Port Klang to
Vientiane respectively. As expected, the transport mode with the highest steepness
ratio is road transport, followed by rail transport, and sea transport. Rail transport
takes up to 13% and sea transport comprises 19% of the total transport cost. Road
transport has the highest share with 52%. Other related costs are quite considerable
with a ratio of 16% of the total transport cost. The delivered price up to Vientiane
will be USD 41,900 per TEU or USD 3.03 per bottle. The transport cost from
TP
15PT As demonstrated in Chapter 6
280
Marseilles via Port Klang to Vientiane will correspond to 6.9% of the total cost of
goods upon arrival in Vientiane.
Figure 8.29: Marseilles-Port Klang-Lad Krabang-Vientiane
Source: The Author
Figure 8.30: Port Klang-Lad Krabang-Vientiane
Cost USD Vientiane
3,000 Thanaleng2,7502,500 Nongkhai2,2502,0001,7501,500 Lad Krabang1,2501,000
750500
Klang 300 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100Road transport Rail transport Distance (km)
Source: The Author
Costs USD VientianeThanaleng
2,7502,5002,250 Nongkhai2,0001,750 Lad Krabang1,5001,2501,000 Port Klang
750500250
0Marseilles 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000
Sea transport Road transport Distance (km)Rail transport
281
8.3.12: Wine import routeing summary
Of all the alternative journeys between Marseilles and Vientiane, the option via Port
Klang achieves the most competitive transit time with a reasonable confidence index
while the alternative via Danang achieves the most competitive transport cost (see
Table 8.17) but strangely enough, the preferred import route for wine from Marseilles
is via Bangkok. This is probably due to the central role held by the Lao embassy in
Bangkok in delivering transit documents.
If the goods transit through Vietnam, the Vietnamese Ministry of Trade will have to
issue the transit documents upon request by the Lao Ministry of Commerce while
when the goods transits through Thailand, transit documents and certificates of final
destination issued by the Lao embassy in Bangkok are sufficient to secure the release
of Lao transit goods from Thai Customs to continue their journey into Lao PDR.
Route No. 10 via Port Klang is still unknown to the majority of Lao importers and
logistics/transport service providers but can become an important import route in the
near future with its competitive pricing (compared to other routes only transiting
through Thailand) and transit time.
Table 8.17: Total transport costs, transit time and confidence index
Route Total Transport Cost (USD)
Total Transit Time (days)
Confidence index
6 Via Danang (Vietnam) 2,797 32/34 2.75 7 Via Bangkok (Thailand) 2,927.3 31/33 3.13 8 Via Laem Chabang (Thailand)
2,906.5 31/33 3.19
9 Via Lad Krabang (Thailand) 2,956 33/35 3.15 10 Via Port Klang (Malaysia) 2,900 28/30 3.13 Source: The Author
At the present moment, Laotian importers of European goods are not fully aware of
the multimodal alternatives that are offered to them via Thailand and Malaysia. This
ought be due to the fact that most of these importers prefer to buy their product CIF
Thanaleng, CIF Bangkok or CIF Laem Chabang thus not controlling the transport
chain until the goods have been discharged at the port of arrival. If Laotian importers
282
want to benefit from the various route options that are offered to them, then they will
have to negotiate their international trade under trade terms that gives them control of
the transport chain. These INCOTERMS, such as FOB or FCA Marseilles, will assist
in the control of the transport chain, as Laotian importers will be able to organise and
nominate the main carriers and choose the most suitable route.
When comparing the costs involved in these routes, sea transport is as expected the
cheapest per cost/km, rail is intermediate and road transport is the most expensive
(see Table 8.18). It is also worth noting that the various other charges represent quite
a significant proportion of the final ‘delivered’ price into Lao PDR. On certain route,
such as via Bangkok, transit and other charges can represent up to 22% of the total
transport cost.
Table 8.18: Cost of freight/km by modes of transport with confidence index
Route Mode Cost/km (USD) Confidence index 6: Marseilles-Singapore Sea (main) 0.05 4 Singapore-Danang Sea (feeder) 0.21 3 Danang-Vientiane Road 0.71 1 7: Marseilles-Singapore Sea (main) 0.05 4 Singapore-Bangkok Sea (feeder) 0.12 4 Bangkok-Vientiane Road 2.30 3 8: Marseilles-Singapore Sea (main) 0.0.5 4 Singapore-Laem Chabang Sea (feeder) 0.12 4 Laem Chabang-Vientiane Road 2.05 3 9: Marseilles-Singapore Sea (main) 0.05 4 Singapore-Laem Chabang Sea (feeder) 0.12 4 Laem Chabang-Lad Krabang
Rail 0.20 2
Lad Krabang-Vientiane Road 2.45 3 10: Marseilles-Port Klang Sea (main) 0.04 4 Port Klang-Lad Krabang Rail 0.28 3 Lad Krabang-Vientiane Road 2.45 3 Source: The Author
Table 8.19 illustrates the transport cost per bottle of wine according to the alternative
import routeing. There is not much difference between the various routes in terms of
283
price. The transit time and confidence index will determine the route chosen within
import and transit regulatory constraints.
Table 8.19: Cost of transport (per bottle) from Marseilles
Route Average cost of wine per bottle
Cost of transport per
bottle
Total cost (bottle & transport)
6 Via Danang USD 2.82 USD 0.21 USD 3.03 7 Via Bangkok USD 2.82 USD 0.22 USD 3.04 8 Via Laem Chabang USD 2.82 USD 0.21 USD 3.03 9 Via Lad Krabang USD 2.82 USD 0.22 USD 3.04 10 Via Port Klang USD 2.82 USD 0.21 USD 3.03 Source: The Author
The findings in Part B are even more interesting than in Part A as no matter the
import routeing alternative there is only a USD 0.01 difference in transport cost per
wine bottle. The cost of transport for Route 6, Route 8 and Route 10 is at USD 0.21
per bottle but Route 10 is the only routeing alternative that uses rail transport. Route
7 and Route 9 share the same transport cost per wine bottle but Route 9 includes the
intermodal transfer and rail costs between Laem Chabang and Lad Krabang ICD. The
final decision regarding import routeing selection should be highly dependent on
transit time and confidence index. Nonetheless, Bangkok Port is the dominant import
port for Lao trade but this is not because of price, transit time or confidence index.
The dominance of Bangkok Port is based on the location of transit-related regulatory
agencies that may facilitate or impede the movement of wine from Bangkok Port to
Vientiane (i.e. the Lao embassy, the Port Authority of Thailand and the location of the
dedicated transit warehouse for Lao PDR under the Thai Customs Department).
284
PART C: EXPORT ROUTEING FROM VIENTIANE TO SINGAPORE
The scale of trade in the region requires that new developments in transport,
particularly in the field of freight forwarding, multimodal transport and logistics
management be adapted to suit South East Asia’s particular needs. Trade activities
contribute significantly to economic development and an efficiently managed
transport system is a prerequisite for trade competitiveness (Karandawala, 1999). The
freight forwarding industry can play a vital role in promoting international trade in the
region. The services of a qualified and credible freight forwarder can effectively
assist exporters and importers to reduce transport and documentation costs as well as
inventory due to its ability to select and contract appropriate transport arrangements
for each consignment and employ “just-in-time” logistics practices (Banomyong,
1999b).
Freight forwarders, when offering multimodal transport services, relieve importers
and exporters from transport related problems as forwarders are able to identify the
optimum route and combination of transport modes that would provide importers and
exporters with value for money. As an example of the routeing choices that could be
managed by forwarders in South East Asia, a non-exhaustive selection of routes and
combination of transport modes available on the Vientiane-Singapore corridor are
presented (see Table 8.20).
Table 8.20: Routeing alternatives for freight between Vientiane (Lao PDR) and
Singapore
Route
Origin: Mode Border Mode Transload Mode Destination:
A Vientiane Road Lao Bao-Houey Khaki
Road Danang (Vietnam)
Sea Singapore
B Vientiane Road Thanaleng-Nongkhai
Road Bangkok (Thailand)
Road Singapore
C Vientiane Road Thanaleng-Nongkhai
Rail Lad Krabang (Thailand)
Rail Singapore
D Vientiane Road Thanaleng-Nongkhai
Road Laem Chabang (Thailand)
Sea Singapore
Source: Compiled from industry sources
285
8.3.13 Route A: “Road-Sea” via Danang (Vietnam)
Table 8.21: Vientiane-Danang-Singapore
Day Leg Mode Transit time*
Distance (km)
Cost (USD)
Confidence index
1 Vientiane-Danang
Road 3 days 1,060 750 1
LaoBao-Houei Kaki Customs
2 hours 0 220 1***
4 Danang Charges
0 20 3
THC 0 1 2 5 Danang
waiting time 1 day 0 - 3
Danang-Singapore
Sea 4 days 1,910 400 3
9 Singapore Charges
0 59 4
Other Handling Charges**
0 700 2
TOTAL 9/10 days 2,970 2,150 2.37 *Assuming no delays ** Include profit ***This confidence rating can be improved with the payment of a higher customs charge or other types of financial incentive. Source: Compiled from industry sources
Route A, via Vietnam has been, traditionally, the only sea access for Lao PDR (see
routeing map in Appendix E1). The confidence index for this route is very low at
2.37. Many of the respondents felt that there were too many factors that could not be
controlled. Transport is not considered to be a big problem even when road transport
takes up to 34% of the total transport cost while sea transport is only at 18%. It is the
other charges not directly related to transport, which are very hard to quantify
precisely. Depending on the officials involved in the transit process the other charges
may increase or decrease. This is one of the reasons why other handling charges are
very high for transit via Vietnam at USD 700. It is assumed that Customs charges are
distributed evenly among Lao and Vietnamese customs officials. Figure 8.31
represents the cost build-up along route A.
286
Figure 8.31: Vientiane-Lao Bao-Houey Khaki-Danang-Singapore
Cost USD
2,2002,0001,8001,600 Danang1,4001,2001,000 Houey Khaki
800 Singapore600400 Lao Bao200
Vientiane 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500Road transport Sea transport Distance (km)Other charges Customs
Source: The Author
The steepness of the road transport curve is greater than for sea transport. This route
has many weaknesses, especially with charges not directly related to transport, which
is at 46.5% with customs charges comprising up to 22% of the inland transport cost.
The transit time for Route A is around 9 days, almost equally separated between the
inland and the sea-leg. The transit time given is under the assumption that there are
no administrative delays while the goods are in transit.
287
8.3.14 Route B: “All road” via Bangkok (Thailand) Table 8.22: Vientiane-Bangkok-Singapore (All road) Day Leg Mode Transit time* Distance
(km) Cost (USD) Confidence
index 1 Vientiane-
Thanaleng Road 1 hour 13 47 3
Thanaleng-Nongkhai
Bridge 0.5 hour 4 8 4
Nongkhai-Bangkok
Road 1 day 633 315 3
Document Charge 0 50 3 Customs***
Lao side Thai side
0 13 26
2 2
Transit Entry Document
0 5 2
4 Bangkok-Padang Besar
Road 2 days 973 658 2
Thai Customs fees 0 26 2*** 5 Padang Besar-
Singapore Road 1 days 567 552 3
Malaysian Customs fees
0 80 3
Singapore Charges**
0 59 4
Other Handling Charges**
0 300 3
TOTAL 4/5 days 2,190 2,139 2.76 * Assuming no delays ** Include profit *** Personal connections and financial incentives can help increase Customs’ confidence index Source: Compiled from industry sources
This “all-road” option (see routeing map in Appendix E2) is in theory possible but it
has never been used in practice even though the transit time is, theoretically, very
competitive compared to route A. It is possible for the cargo to move on the same
truck for the whole journey. The only constraint is that that truck must belong to the
Express Transit Organisation (ETO), which is the Thai state-own trucking company.
It is the only company that has all the transit rights from Vientiane to Singapore via
Malaysia. If a different trucking company is involved, the goods will have to be
transloaded in Nongkhai, Bangkok, and Padang Besar at an average cost of USD 12
288
per transload. This cost is included in the other handling charges of USD 300. Figure
8.32 illustrates freight movement on the Vientiane-Bangkok-Singapore route.
Figure 8.32: Vientiane-Bangkok-Singapore
Cost USD
2,200 Singapore2,0001,8001,6001,4001,2001,000 Nongkhai
800 Padang Besar600400 Bangkok200 Thanaleng
Vientiane 300 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100Road transport Distance (km)Other charges Customs
Source: The Author
The confidence index for route B is higher than for route A at 2.76. The confidence
index for road transport is not too bad at 2.75 but the many border crossings seem to
be one of the main weak points of the route. It is noteworthy that Malaysian customs
are given a ‘fairly confident’ rating compared to the ‘not very confident rating’
assigned to Thai and Lao customs. Customs fees take up to 7% of the total transport
costs while document charges are at around 2.5%. Other handling charges make up to
17% of the total transport cost as far as Singapore. Road transport represents up to
73.5% of the total transport cost. Road transport cost is at USD 0.71/km per TEU
from Vientiane to Singapore. A closer analysis of each segment will reveal that road
transport cost break down as follows:
• Vientiane-Thanaleng leg is at USD 3.6/km per TEU;
• Thanaleng-Nongkhai leg is at USD 2/km per TEU;
• Nongkhai-Bangkok leg is at USD 0.49/km per TEU;
• Bangkok-Padang Besar leg is at USD 0.67/km per TEU;
• Padang Besar-Singapore leg is at USD 0.97/km per TEU.
289
8.3.15 Route C: “Road-Sea” via Bangkok (Thailand)
Table 8.23: Vientiane-Bangkok-Singapore (Road-Sea)
Day Leg Mode Transit time* Distance (km)
Cost (USD)
Confidence index
1 Vientiane-Thanaleng
Road 1 hour 13 47 3
Thanaleng-Nongkhai
Bridge 0.5 hour 4 8 4
Nongkhai-Bangkok
Road 1 day 633 315 3
Document Charge
0 50 3
Customs*** Lao side Thai side
0 13 26
2 2
Transit Entry Document
0 5 2
2 Bangkok Port: 1.Container stevedorage 2. Container wharfage 3. Lift on/off charges 4. THC
1 day 0 21 22 17 68
3 3 3 3
B/L charge 0 13 3 Tea money****
Customs Port
0 6.7 14.1
1 1
3 Feeder Connection
1 day 0 -
Bangkok-Singapore
4 days 1,540 230 4
Singapore Charges**
0 59 4
Other Handling Charges**
0 300 3
TOTAL 6/7 days 2,190 1,214.8 2.76 * Assuming no delays ** Include profit *** Personal connections and financial incentives can help increase Customs’ confidence index **** This is the minimum amount required for normal services Source: Compiled from industry sources
290
Route C is currently the favoured and the most commonly selected route on the
Vientiane-Singapore corridor (see routeing map in Appendix E3). It is the cheapest
route with a competitive transit time. The confidence index is still better than for
Route A and equivalent to the all road option of route B. Road transport represents
30% of the total transport cost while sea transport takes 19%. Customs charges are at
3%, tea money is at 2% and document charges are at 6% of the total cost between
Vientiane and Singapore. Other handling charges are representative of 40% of the
whole transport cost.
Route C via Bangkok port can become even more competitive if other charges are
reduced (i.e. THC, documents, tea-money, etc.). Figure 8.33 graphically illustrates
how these other charges increase the total transport cost. The highest cost increase
occurs during the intermodal transfer at Bangkok port followed by the border crossing
between Thanaleng and Nongkhai. Traffic is not diverted from the border crossing
between Thanaleng and Nongkhai, as it is the main entry and exit point into Lao PDR
in terms of volume and value.
Figure 8.33: Vientiane-Bangkok port-Singapore
Cost USD
2,2002,0001,8001,6001,400 Singapore1,2001,000
800 Nongkhai600400 Bangkok port200 Thanaleng
Vientiane 300 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100Road transport Sea transport Distance (km)Other charges Customs
Source: The Author
291
The deep-sea port of Laem Chabang is another viable alternative though slightly more
expensive by USD 26.2. Nonetheless, the confidence index via Laem Chabang is
rated at 3.06, which is the highest of all the routes. It is then a question for the freight
forwarder to select for his client the best possible option. For Lao traders, transit
time, reliability and costs are considered the three most important factors in their
selection of modal choices. The combination of road and sea transport via Thailand
to Singapore seems to fulfil Lao traders’ criteria of reasonable transit time, higher
reliability and competitive cost.
The transit time is slower than the all-road solution by one to two days, which can be
acceptable depending on the nature of the product transported. Overall reliability is
not worse than the all road option but the Bangkok (or Laem Chabang) to Singapore
segment has a confidence index of 4. This is a very important factor for the selection
of the road-sea modal combination via Thailand as the sea-leg represents 70% of the
total distance. Transport cost is also the lowest of all the routes at USD 1,214.8/TEU
compared to USD 2,139/TEU for the all road option.
292
8.3.16 Route D: “Road-Rail-Road” via Lad Krabang (Thailand)
Table 8.24: Vientiane-Lad Krabang-Singapore
Day Leg Mode Transit time*
Distance (km)
Cost (USD)
Confidence index
1 Vientiane-Thanaleng
Road 1 hour 13 47 3
Thanaleng-Nongkhai
Bridge 0.5 hour 4 8 4
Nongkhai-Lad Krabang
Rail 30 hours 595 350 2
Document Charge
0 50 3
Customs: Lao Side Thai Side
0 13 26
2 2
Transit Entry Document
0 5 2
Rail Transfer charge
0 12 3
2 Lad Krabang ICD: 1.Handling Charge 2.Gate Charge 3. THC
1 day 0 13 1.5 68
3 3 3
Malaysian Customs fees
0 80 3
Lad Krabang-Woodland (Singapore)
Rail 4.5 day 1,573 450 3
Rail Transfer charge
0 12 3
Woodland-Singapore port
0.5 day 5 55 3
Singapore charges
0 59 4
Other Charges**
0 300 3
TOTAL 7/8 days 2,190 1,549.5 2.82 * Assuming no delays **Include profit Source: Compiled from industry sources
293
There is a possibility of using rail transport for the Vientiane-Singapore corridor but
in practice rail is never used (see routeing map Appendix E4). The main reason is
because there is no regular schedule from Nongkhai to Lad Krabang ICD. The price
for rail transport between Nongkhai and Lad Krabang ICD is quite competitive at
USD 350/TEU but the confidence index is lower at only 2. The transit time of 30
hours is slightly longer than for road transport. The State Railway of Thailand (SRT)
used to offer a regular schedule service but due to the low volumes of goods coming
in and out of Lao PDR, the SRT decided to offer the rail service on a chartering basis
and only for block trains.
The rail transport via Malaysia is somewhat less problematic with daily departures but
most of the trains terminate at Port Klang. Transloading will occur before the goods
can be directed towards Woodland rail station in Singapore. Road transport usage for
this route is between Vientiane and Nongkhai, and between Woodland rail station and
Singapore port. Compared to the distance road transport is the most expensive mode
of transport with USD 55/TEU for both segments. Figure 8.34 explains the cost
structure of the road-rail combination between Vientiane and Singapore.
Figure 8.34: Vientiane-Lad Krabang ICD-Singapore
Cost USD
2,2002,0001,8001,600 Singapore port1,4001,200 Port Klang1,000
800 Nongkhai600 Woodland rail400 Lad Krabang station200 Thanaleng
Vientiane 300 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100Road transport Rail transport Distance (km)Other charges Customs
Source: The Author
294
Road transport costs only take up 7% while rail transport, as the main mode of
transport, represents 52% of the total transport costs. The distance covered by rail
transport on this route is 98% of the whole journey. The confidence index is better
than the all-road option or the road-sea combination via Bangkok port at 2.82. This is
quite good for a route that only exists in theory. The transit time is marginally longer
than for the road-sea combination but could be improved if a direct service is
introduced from Lad Krabang to Singapore. Due to the low volumes of goods
involved in the Lao trade, a direct service between Nongkhai and Singapore does not
seem to be feasible at the present moment.
The air transport option was not introduced in this selection of combination of modal
choices, between Vientiane and Singapore, as they are seen more as “emergency
networks” (Banomyong et al., 1999). However, the role of air transport must never
be discounted especially when high value or perishable goods are involved.
The regional freight forwarder seems to be the only entity capable of collecting the
amount of data needed for route and mode selection. This is done through the
forwarder’s network of agencies in South East Asia. This network will provide the
forwarder with information related to transport infrastructure, rules and regulations,
transit procedures, available logistics services and costs involved in the management
of regional multimodal transport corridors within global supply chains. It is
practically impossible for a shipper or a consignee to have all the data related to
alternative routeing and modal combinations for decision-making purposes.
8.3.17 Summary of export routeing from Vientiane to Singapore
Freight forwarders, when offering multimodal transport services, need to be able to
offer not only door-to-door transport but also to take complete control of the supply
chain (if possible). The Vientiane-Singapore corridor has been taken as an illustrative
case study of a range of transport and logistics issues that need to be addressed by
freight forwarders operating in South East Asia. This Vientiane to Singapore corridor
offers a selection of alternatives relating to modal choice and combination of modes
295
of transport. The all-road option gives the fastest transit time, the road-sea
combination via Bangkok port offers the cheapest transport cost and the road-rail
solution has the highest confidence index (see Table 8.25). Currently, almost all of
the goods carried from Vientiane to Singapore are done with a road-sea combination
through Bangkok port. Singapore, in itself, is not the main destination for Lao cargo
but it is a very important transhipment point for main-line mother-vessel connections
to the rest of the world.
Table 8.25: Cost of freight, transit time and confidence index
Route: Vientiane-Singapore
Total Transport Cost (USD)
Total Transit Time
Confidence index
A: via Danang (road-sea)
2,150/TEU 9/10 days 2.37
B: via Bangkok (all-road)
2,139/TEU 4/5 days 2.76
C: via Bangkok (road-sea)
1,214.8/TEU 6/7 days 2.76
D: via Lad Krabang (road-rail-road)
1,549.5/TEU 7/8 days 2.82
Source: The Author
The combination of total transport cost, total transit time and confidence index factors
does explain to a certain extent why the road-sea combination via Bangkok port is the
most favoured routeing. Nonetheless, the road-rail-road option via Lad Krabang to
Singapore needs to be further explored because of its higher confidence index. If the
volume of cargo increases in the near future, it might be possible that the freight rates
will become more competitive.
296
8.4 CONCLUSIONS
The recognition of transport logistics, and in particular multimodal transport, as a
vital element in export and import has changed the way business is done forever.
Multimodal transport has arisen as a result of customers’ demand for more efficient,
rapid, and reliable deliveries (Andersson & Hasson, 1998). Multimodal transport
enables economies of scale within a transportation system where modes are used in
the most productive manner. Transit time and cost take a fundamental importance on
the globalisation of trade and consequently transportation.
Exporters, importers and logistics service providers must re-evaluate their strategies
for freight transportation, as all modes and all possible transfers between modes must
be considered. With the development of new nodal and multimodal infrastructure in
the region, Lao PDR has achieved a growing accessibility to the international market.
Table 8.26 summarises the percentage of each transport mode and nodal link in the
total transport costs for Lao export to and import from Europe.
Table 8.26: Percentage summary of total transport costs
Route Road Rail Sea (Main) Sea (Feeder) Other* Total
1 22% - 37% 12% 29% 100%
2 15% - 51% 9% 25% 100%
3 16% - 51% 9% 24% 100%
4 14% 1% 50% 9% 26% 100%
5 14% 15% 48% - 23% 100%
6 28% - 21% 14% 37% 100%
7 52% - 20% 6% 22% 100%
8 53% - 20% 6% 21% 100%
9 52% 1% 20% 6% 21% 100%
10 53% 13% 19% - 15% 100%
* Include Customs and other usual financial incentives
Source: The Author
297
For Lao garment exporters, on average, the total transport cost to Rotterdam is shared
by road transport (16.2%), rail transport (3.2%), Main sea transport (47.4%), Feeder
(7.8%) and other charges (25.4%). The main sea leg has the highest share of the total
transport cost. Route No. 5 via Port Klang, as the most competitive route, has also the
lowest ratio of other charges at 23%.
Lao wine importers are faced with a higher average for road transport cost (47.6%)
but with a lower sea transport cost (main) at 20%. Route No. 10 via port Klang,
which is the most competitive in terms of transit time, has the lowest ratio of other
charges for import at 15% while Route No. 6 via Danang, which is the most
competitive in terms of pricing, has a ratio of other charges at 37%. Route No. 6 can
become more competitive if that other charges' ratio is reduced. The confidence
indices introduced in this chapter do not have a strong impact on actual routeing
selection. Bangkok Port, with a confidence index of 2.89 for export and 3.13 for
import, is still the preferred transit port for Lao cargo destined to or imported from
Europe even though routeing via Laem Chabang, Lad Krabang and Port Klang
received a higher confidence rating (except for import via Port Klang which received
the same confidence rating as via Bangkok Port).
The efficient management of these multimodal transport corridors is of utmost
importance to Lao exporters and importers. Multimodal transport operators and
logistics service providers seem to be the best equipped to select the most competitive
and reliable route. The example of multimodal transport corridors within South East
Asia has shown that only regional freight forwarders can gather the amount of data
needed for the selection of the most appropriate corridor. The most commonly used
corridor is the road-sea option via Bangkok Port, which is the cheapest in term of
cost, the all-road option has the fastest transit time and the road-rail-road option has
the highest confidence index. The road-sea option via Bangkok Port is still the
preferred option not only because of the lowest freight rates but also due to reasonable
transit time and confidence index.