Chapter 3
description
Transcript of Chapter 3
Chapter 3Sentencing and the Presentence
Investigation Report
Philosophy of Community Corrections
An offender can learn best how to live productively in a community by remaining in free society under supervision, as opposed to being transferred to a warehouse-like setting of a jail or prison
Factors That Affect Granting a Community Sentence Eligibility for community corrections Conditions of probation fixed by statute Availability and quality of intermediate
sanctions and other community-based services
Factors such as the social stability of the offender, family ties, marital status, employment and drug abuse history
Sentencing Guidelines Goals include:
Reduction or elimination of sentencing disparity Increased judicial accountability Increased punishment for violent offenders A basis for population projections and resource
allocation
Sentencing Guidelines, cont. Presumptive sentencing guidelines
require judges to use the guidelines and provide written reasons for any deviation
Voluntary sentencing guidelines are suggestions that judges may or may not accept
Punishment Units is a system tried by Oregon that converted sentences into predefined unit numbers
Sentencing Commissions Sentencing commissions exist in about half
the states and the federal government and monitor the judicial use of the guidelines
The commissions are responsible for evaluating and revising the guidelines as appropriate
Conditions of Community Corrections
Standard Conditions are imposed on all persons with community sentences regardless of the offense
Special Conditions are in addition to standard conditions and are tailored to fit the problems and needs of the offender
Conditions of Community Corrections, cont.
Limitations of special conditions Must be clear and specific Must be reasonable Must either protect society or rehabilitate the
offender Must be related to the offense of conviction
Conditions of Community Corrections, cont. Supervision conditions must be
constitutional The government must establish a
“compelling state interest” First Amendment rights of religion, speech,
assembly, press, and the right to petition the government for redress of grievances
Searches and seizures The privilege against self-incrimination
The Presentence Investigation Report The PSI is a document prepared by a
probation officer to aid judges in the sentencing decision, and Used by prosecutors, defense attorneys, parole
boards and probation and parole officers Describes the nature of the offense, offender
characteristics criminal history, loss to the victim and sentencing recommendations
Contents of the PSI Report Offender-Based PSI Reports: 1920s-
1980s, were: focused on rehabilitation utilized an indeterminate sentencing structure
Offense-Based PSI Reports: 1980s-Present: focus on the crime committed utilize a determinate sentence structure
Contents of the PSI Report A Victim Impact Statement is required in all
federal and most state PSIs Includes physical injuries and emotional and
psychological toll on victim and victim’s family
Federal PSIs must include the defendant’s ability to pay fines and restitution
Preparing the PSI Report The PSI is ideally prepared after
adjudication of guilt but before sentencing The PSI process consists of:
The initial interview Investigation and verification The evaluative summary The sentence recommendation
Legal Issues Concerning the PSI Report
Disclosure Inaccuracies Hearsay The Exclusionary Rule The Miranda Warning The right to a lawyer