Chapter *22: Unavoidable Adverse Impacts - nyc.gov · As discussed in Chapter 13, ... Mt. Eden...

8
Jerome Avenue Rezoning EIS Chapter 22: Unavoidable Adverse Impacts * 22-1 22.1 Introduction This chapter summarizes unavoidable significant adverse impacts that may result from the Proposed Actions. According to the City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR) Technical Manual, unavoidable significant adverse impacts are those that would occur if a proposed project or action is implemented regardless of the mitigation employed, or if mitigation is infeasible. As described in Chapter 21, “Mitigation,” the Proposed Actions would result in significant adverse impacts with respect to community facilities (public schools), shadows, transportation (traffic, transportation, and pedestrians), and construction (transportation, and noise). To the extent practicable, mitigation has been proposed for these identified significant adverse impacts. However, in some instances, no practicable mitigation has been identified to fully mitigate significant adverse impacts, and there are no reasonable alternatives to the Proposed Actions that would meet the Proposed Actions’ purpose and need, eliminate potential impacts and not cause other or similar significant adverse impacts. In other cases mitigation has been proposed, but absent a commitment to implement the mitigation, the impacts may not be eliminated. 22.2 Shadows As discussed in Chapter 6, “Shadows,” a detailed shadows analysis determined that development resulting from the Proposed Actions would result in significant adverse shadow impacts on eight open space resources. No historic resources would be affected by incremental shadows. The 146 projected and potential development sites identified in the RWCDS would result in incremental shadow coverage on 41 open space resources. The detailed shadows analysis identified significant adverse impacts at eight open space resources. The analysis determined that six resources (Bronx School of Young Leaders, PS 306 Schoolyard, Mount Hope Playground, Goble Playground, Inwood Park, Keltch Park) would experience significant incremental shadow coverage, duration, and/or periods of complete sunlight loss that could have the potential to affect open space utilization or enjoyment. Two resources (Edward L Grant Greenstreet, Jerome Avenue/Grant Avenue Greenstreet) would not receive adequate sunlight * This chapter has been revised since the DEIS in the areas of community facilities and services, shadows, transportation, and construction to reflect further evaluation of potential mitigation measures conducted between the DEIS and FEIS in coordination between lead agency, DCP, and other involved and interested agencies.

Transcript of Chapter *22: Unavoidable Adverse Impacts - nyc.gov · As discussed in Chapter 13, ... Mt. Eden...

Page 1: Chapter *22: Unavoidable Adverse Impacts - nyc.gov · As discussed in Chapter 13, ... Mt. Eden Avenue, ... The Proposed Actions would result in a capacity shortfall of the east and

Jerome Avenue Rezoning E I S

Chapter 22: Unavoidable Adverse Impacts *

22-1

22.1 Introduction

This chapter summarizes unavoidable significant adverse impacts that may result from the Proposed

Actions. According to the City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR) Technical Manual, unavoidable

significant adverse impacts are those that would occur if a proposed project or action is implemented

regardless of the mitigation employed, or if mitigation is infeasible.

As described in Chapter 21, “Mitigation,” the Proposed Actions would result in significant adverse

impacts with respect to community facilities (public schools), shadows, transportation (traffic,

transportation, and pedestrians), and construction (transportation, and noise). To the extent

practicable, mitigation has been proposed for these identified significant adverse impacts. However, in

some instances, no practicable mitigation has been identified to fully mitigate significant adverse

impacts, and there are no reasonable alternatives to the Proposed Actions that would meet the

Proposed Actions’ purpose and need, eliminate potential impacts and not cause other or similar

significant adverse impacts. In other cases mitigation has been proposed, but absent a commitment to

implement the mitigation, the impacts may not be eliminated.

22.2 Shadows

As discussed in Chapter 6, “Shadows,” a detailed shadows analysis determined that development

resulting from the Proposed Actions would result in significant adverse shadow impacts on eight open

space resources. No historic resources would be affected by incremental shadows. The 146 projected

and potential development sites identified in the RWCDS would result in incremental shadow coverage

on 41 open space resources. The detailed shadows analysis identified significant adverse impacts at

eight open space resources. The analysis determined that six resources (Bronx School of Young Leaders,

PS 306 Schoolyard, Mount Hope Playground, Goble Playground, Inwood Park, Keltch Park) would

experience significant incremental shadow coverage, duration, and/or periods of complete sunlight loss

that could have the potential to affect open space utilization or enjoyment. Two resources (Edward L

Grant Greenstreet, Jerome Avenue/Grant Avenue Greenstreet) would not receive adequate sunlight

* This chapter has been revised since the DEIS in the areas of community facilities and services, shadows, transportation, and construction to reflect further evaluation of potential mitigation measures conducted between the DEIS and FEIS in coordination between lead agency, DCP, and other involved and interested agencies.

Page 2: Chapter *22: Unavoidable Adverse Impacts - nyc.gov · As discussed in Chapter 13, ... Mt. Eden Avenue, ... The Proposed Actions would result in a capacity shortfall of the east and

New York City Department of City Planning

22-2

during the growing season (at least the four to six hour minimum specified in the CEQR Technical

Manual) as a result of incremental shadow coverage and vegetation at these resources could be

significantly impacted. Measures to reduce or eliminate the project’s shadow impacts were explored in

consultation with the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) between the DEIS and

FEIS. As discussed in Chapter 21, “Mitigation,” it has been determined that there are no feasible or

practicable mitigation measures that can be implemented to mitigate this impact, and the Proposed

Actions’ significant adverse shadows impact on the affected resources would remain unmitigated.

22.3 Transportation

The Proposed Actions would result, as detailed below, in significant adverse impacts to: a) vehicular

traffic at 22 intersections, b) public bus service on three routes, and c) pedestrians at one sidewalk.

TRAFFIC

As discussed in Chapter 13, “Transportation,” under CEQR Technical Manual impact criteria (which are

based on lane group delay and levels of service), the Proposed Actions would result in significant

adverse traffic impacts at 22 intersections during one or more analyzed peak hours. Significant adverse

impacts were identified to 15 lane groups at 14 intersections in the weekday AM peak hour, 17 lane

groups at 14 intersections in the weekday midday peak hour, 33 lane groups at 20 intersections in the

weekday PM peak hour, and 28 lane groups at 19 intersections in the Saturday midday peak hour (see

Figure 22-1, “Significant Adverse Impact Traffic Analysis Locations”). Most of these impacts could be

mitigated through the implementation of traffic engineering improvements, including:

Modification of traffic signal phasing and/or timing; and

Elimination of on-street parking within 100 feet of intersections to add a limited travel lane.

The types of traffic mitigation measures proposed herein are standard measures that are routinely

identified by the City and considered feasible for implementation. Implementation of the

recommended traffic engineering improvements is subject to review and approval by the New York City

Department of Transportation (DOT). In the absence of the application of mitigation measures, the

impacts would remain unmitigated.

According to CEQR Technical Manual criteria, an impact is considered fully mitigated when the resulting

level of service (LOS) degradation under the Action-with-Mitigation Condition compared with the No-

Action condition is no longer deemed significant following the impact criteria described in Chapter 13,

“Transportation.” With implementation of the recommended traffic engineering improvements,

Page 3: Chapter *22: Unavoidable Adverse Impacts - nyc.gov · As discussed in Chapter 13, ... Mt. Eden Avenue, ... The Proposed Actions would result in a capacity shortfall of the east and

Jerome Avenue Rezoning EIS

Chapter 22: Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

22-3

significant adverse traffic impacts would be fully mitigated at all but one lane group at one intersection

during the weekday AM and midday peak hours, 19 lane groups at eight intersections during the

weekday PM peak hour, and five lane groups at three intersections during the Saturday midday peak

hour (see Figure 22-2, “Unmitigated Significant Adverse Impact Traffic Analysis Locations”). In total,

impacts to one or more lane groups would remain unmitigated in one or more peak hours at eight

intersections. These unmitigated impacts would generally occur along Jerome Avenue at Kingsbridge

Road, Fordham Road, Burnside Avenue, and 167th Street, and at River Avenue at 167th Street, and at

Grand Concourse at Tremont Avenue, Mt. Eden Avenue, and 167th Street. These impacts would

constitute unavoidable significant adverse traffic impacts as a result of the Proposed Action.

TRANSIT

Bus

The Proposed Actions would result in a capacity shortfall of the east and westbound Bx11, southbound

Bx32, and eastbound Bx35 in the AM peak hour and on the westbound Bx11, north and southbound

Bx32, and east and westbound Bx35 in the PM peak hour. The significant adverse impacts to Bx11,

Bx32, and Bx35 local bus service could be fully mitigated by the addition of a total of five standard buses

in the AM peak hour and six standard buses in the PM peak hour. If these changes are not made, these

impacts would be considered unavoidable.

Pedestrians

Incremental demand from the Proposed Actions would significantly adversely impact one of the 33

analyzed sidewalks elements during one peak hour. As outlined in Chapter 21, “Mitigation,” the

identified sidewalk impact would be fully mitigated through sidewalk widening. Implementation of

these measures would be subject to review and approval by DOT. If, prior to implementation, DOT

determines that an identified mitigation measure is infeasible, an alternative and equivalent mitigation

measure will be identified. If no feasible measures can be identified, the projected impacts would

remain unmitigated and would therefore be considered unavailable adverse impacts.

Page 4: Chapter *22: Unavoidable Adverse Impacts - nyc.gov · As discussed in Chapter 13, ... Mt. Eden Avenue, ... The Proposed Actions would result in a capacity shortfall of the east and

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

HAR L EM RI V

E R

3 AV

WALTO

N AV

JERO

ME AV

PARK

AV

10 AV

BROA

DWAY

MAJOR DEE

GAN EXWY

WASH

INGT

ON AV

MORR

ISAV

E 167 ST

CLAY

AV

E 165 ST

GRAN

D AV

SED G

WICK

AVNE

LSON

AV

WEBS

TER A

V

BOSTON RD

OGDE

N AV

E 169 ST

SHER

IDAN

AV9 AV

CEDA

RAV

GERA

RD AV

GRAN

T AV

AUDU

BON A

V

TELL

ERAV E 168 ST

HARL

EMRIV

ERSH

L

V ALE

NTIN

E AV

RIVER

AV

CROTO

NAAV

CRES

TON

AV

COLL

EGE A

V

RYER

AV

W 204 ST

E 170 ST

W 207 ST

W 187 ST

E 180 ST

DYCKMAN ST

W EBBAV

E 184 ST

E 173 ST

FINDL

AY AV

TIEBO

UT AV

UNDE

RCLIF

F AV

HARL

EMRIV

ERDR

IVEWA

Y

SHERMAN AVST

NICH

OLAS

AV

BENN

ETT A

V

H ARL EMRIV ER

DR

CROSS BRONX EXWY

BATH

GATE AV

BROOK AV

E 196 ST

INWOO

D AV

HARR

ISON A

V

FOX S

T

POST AV

M ACO

MBSR

D

W 184 ST

WADSW

ORTH

AV

JESUP

AV

FULT

ON AV

ANDREWS AVS

PROS

PECT

AV

ANTH

ONY A

V

W 167 ST

UNION

AV

BRIGGS

AV

TINTO

N AV

SEAMAN AV

ANDE

RSON

AV

MDESB E X IT 6

W 181 ST

MONR

OE AV

NAGLE AV

E 183 ST

WOODY

CRES

T AV

JENNINGS ST

FREEMAN ST

W FORDHAM RD

W 186 STW 185 ST

E 164 ST

W 168 ST

HRD

NBEX

IT24

W 183 ST

SUMM

IT AV

CROM

WELL

AV

WEEK

S AV

W 182 ST

PAYSON AV

W 190 STW 189 ST

VERMILYEA AV

W 188 ST

VYSE

AV

CLAREMONT PKWY

ISHAM ST

HENR

Y HUDS

ONPK

WY

E 175 ST

E 194 ST

ACADEMY ST

W 166 ST

H ILLSIDEAV

POPH

AM AV

E 158 ST

DR M L K

ING JR

BLVD

SIMPS

ON ST

W 180 ST

W 165 STHU

GHES

AV

W 169 ST

W 178 ST

FRAN

KLIN

AV

BAINBRIDGE A

V

UNIVE

RSITY

AV

ARDEN ST

AQUE

DUCT

AV E

W 179 ST

E 177 ST

SELW

YN AV

TOWNS

END A

V

MARIO

N AV

LORIN

GPL

S

CROTONA PARK N

W 177 ST

THAYER ST

AMST

ERDA

M AV

BAIL E

YAV

COOPER ST

DAVID

SON A

V

CROTONA PARK E

HOME ST

PLIMP

TON A

V

HOE A

V

ANDR

EWS A

V N

CBE N

B EXI T

1C

E 181 ST

E DWAR D

L GRANT HWY

W TR EMONT AV

MERR

IAMAV

MONTGOME

RY AV

W 176 ST

MACOMBS DAM BR

W 215 ST

ARTH

UR AV

ELLIOT PL

CLINT

ON AV

GRAN

DCO

NCOU

RSE

E 161 ST

E 178 ST

E 166 ST

MARCY PL

FTGE

ORGE HILLCB

E NBEX

IT1 D

LOUIS NINE BLVD

E 187 ST

W 206 ST

E 185 ST

MINF

ORD

PL

ECHO PL

E 163 ST

LA FO

NTAIN

E AV

WASHINGTON BR

CART

ER AV

QUARRY RD

OVER

LOOK

TER

BRISTOW ST

W 164 ST

W 170 ST

E 193 ST

ELLWOOD ST

LAUR

EL HILLTE

R

FORE

ST AV

AQUE

DUCT

AV W

CHARLOTTE ST

CBE SB EXIT 1 C-D

W 205 ST

FAIRVIEW AV

W 211 ST

W 162 ST

KELLY ST

E BURNSIDE AV

MDE NB EXIT 7 N

SICKLES ST

CARR

OLL P

L

SOUT

HERN

BLVD

W 202 ST

MELR

OSE A

V

BASS

FORD

AV

RAMP

E 171 ST

E 197 ST

E 192 ST

W KINGSBRIDGE RD

E 162 ST

E 153 ST

EXTE

RIOR

ST

CLINTON PL

E 174 ST

E 190 ST

CLARKE PL E

W 192 ST

PHEL

AN PL

JACK

SON A

V

LORIN

G PL N

MDE NB EXIT 9

WYTHE

PL

W BURNSIDE AV

W 203 ST

ELM

PL

JUME

L PL

W 201 STNORTH ST

MC CLELLAN ST

D EVOE TER

E 186 ST

W 195 ST

TRINI

TY AV

FT W

ASHIN

GTON

AV

W 174 ST

TOPP

ING

AV

FT T RYONPL

CABR

INIBLVD

W 155 ST

W 212 ST

CROTONA PARK S

W 173 ST

RU

PPERT PL

E 189 ST

MDE NB EXIT 7 S

SEAB

URY P

L

FOLIN

ST

E 188 ST

HALL OF FAME TER

STEBBINS AV

HRDS

B EXIT

23

POE P

L

E 157 ST

E 176 ST

HALL

PL

FIELD PL

MONT

EREY

AV

W 19 6 ST

LYMAN PL

CHISHOLM ST

RIVERSIDE DRTIFFANY ST

E 179 ST

UNNA

ME

D ST

OSBO

RNE P

L

W 175 ST

SHAK

ESP E

ARE

AV

F ATHER ZEISER PL

W 172 ST

ITTNER PL

WFA

RMS RD

CAUL

DWEL

L AV

E 172 ST

FEATHERBED LA

W 213 ST

MOUNT HOPE PL

MDE N

B EX

IT 5

BELM

ONT A

V

E 159 ST

FT GEORGE AV

TME N B EXIT1 B

W 193 ST

RITTER PL

STAFF

ST

EAST

BURN

AV

BOGARDUS PL

WEIHER CT

DONGA N PL

MDE NB

EXIT 8

E 182 ST

W 161 ST

ST PAUL'S PL

CLIFFORD PL

W 153 ST

INTER

VALE

AV

E 191 ST

TUDOR PL

CAMERON PL

GRAN

DVIEW

PL

W 171 ST

BUSH ST

MDE SB EXIT 9LA NDIN G RD

E KINGSBRIDGE RD

CROT

ONA P

LCUMMING ST

DEPO

T PL A

PPR

HAMPDEN PL

MIRIAM ST

MAC CRACKE

N AV

MDE S

B EN D

EPOT

PL

WIEG

AND

PLBRANDT PL

WILKINS AV

MORTON PL

FRED

DOUG

L AS S

B LV D

E FORDHAM RD

ALDEN PL

BONNER PL

E MOUNT EDEN AV

W 181 ST

MARCY PL

E 170 ST

W 174 ST

RIVER

AV

W 180 ST

PARK

AV

W 174 STUNNAMED ST

E 178 ST

E 162 ST

E 168 ST

W 174 ST

W 193 ST

E 164 ST

SHER

MAN A

V

E 166 ST

FULT

ON AV

E 176 ST

BELM

ONT A

V

LORIN

GPL

N

CRES

TON AV

HENR

YHUD

SON

PKW

Y

HAR L EMR IV ER

D R

E 178 STTO

WNSEN

D AV

E 175 ST

E 193 ST

E 168 ST

E 180 ST

E 181 ST

E 166 ST

NAGLE AV

E 168 ST

E 163 ST

EXTERIOR ST

E 179 ST

E 182 ST

W TREMONT AV

E 174 ST

E 167 ST

W 182 ST

E 171 ST

9 AV

E 171 ST

E 162 ST

PROSPECT AV

MAJO

RD E

EGAN

EXWY

E 166 ST

E 187 ST

E 188 ST

HOE A

V

E 176 ST

W 175 ST

E 182 ST

E 167 ST

E 165 ST

W 190 ST

TOPP

ING

A V

E 173 ST

T IFFA

NYST

E 170 ST

DAVIDSO

N AV

W

17 7 ST

E 187 ST

W 192 ST

E 182 ST

W 182 ST

MORR

IS AV

E 164 STPARK AV

MORR

ISAV

W 192 ST

ANTH

ONY A

V

E 167 ST

E 171 ST

E 181 ST

W 179 ST

E 1 65 ST

GRAN

D AVW 176 ST

E 178 ST

E 166 ST

ITTNER PL

E 175 ST

E 189 ST

ECHO PL

E 173 ST

E 179 ST

UNNAMED ST

E 180 ST

MOUNT HOPE PL

E 187 ST

HOME ST

PROSP

ECT AV

MAJO

R DE

EGAN

EXWY

MARIONAV

E 178 ST

E 164 ST

FIELD PL

FEATH ERBED LA

E 162 ST

BUSH ST

W 176 ST

W 172 ST

SOUT

HERN

BLV

D

E 176 ST

E 183 ST

BATH

GATE

AV

E 172 ST

E 179 ST

W 175 ST

E 171 STE 170 ST

E 175 ST

E 174 ST

E 176 ST

E 169 ST

CLINT

ON AV

E 181 ST

W 174 ST

CROSS BRONX EXWY

W 184 ST

E 166 ST

E 172 ST

0 1,000 2,000FeetF i g u r e 2 2 - 1

S I G N I F I C A N T A D V E R S E I M P A C TT R A F F I C A N A L Y S I S L O C A T I O N SJerome Avenue Rezoning EIS

! Traffic Analysis Locations!

Significant Adverse ImpactTraffic Analysis LocationsRezoning AreaProjected SitePotential Site

¯N

Page 5: Chapter *22: Unavoidable Adverse Impacts - nyc.gov · As discussed in Chapter 13, ... Mt. Eden Avenue, ... The Proposed Actions would result in a capacity shortfall of the east and

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

HAR LEM R

I VE R

3 AV

WALTO

N AV

JERO

ME AV

PARK

AV

10 AV

BROA

DWAY

MAJOR DEE

GANEX

WY

WASH

INGT

ON AV

MORR

ISAV

E 167 ST

CLAY

AV

E 165 ST

GRAN

D AV

SEDG

WICK

AV

NELS

ON AV

WEBS

TER A

V

BOSTON RD

OGDE

NAV

E 169 ST

SHER

IDAN

AV9 AV

CEDA

RAV

GERA

RD AV

GRAN

T AV

AUDU

BON A

V

TELL

ERAV E 168 ST

HARL

EMRIV

ERSH

L

VALE

NTIN

EAV

RIVER

AV

CROTO

NAAV

CRES

TON

AV

COLL

EGE A

V

RYER

AV

W 204 ST

E 170 ST

W 207 ST

W 187 ST

E 180 ST

DYCKMAN ST

W EBB AV

E 184 ST

E 173 ST

FINDL

AY AV

TIEBO

UT AV

UNDE

RCLIF

F AV

HARL

EMRI

VER

DRIV

EWAY

SHERMAN AVST

NICH

OLAS

AV

BENN

ETT A

V

HARLEMR IVER

DR

CROSS BRONX EXWY

BATH

GATE A

V

BROOK A

V

E 196 ST

INWOO

D AV

HARRISON AV

FOX S

T

POST AV

MACO

MBS

RD

W 184 ST

WADSW

ORTH

AV

JESU

P AV

FULT

ON AV

ANDREWS AV S

PROS

PECT

AV

ANTH

ONY A

V

W 167 ST

UNIO

N AV

BRIGGS A

V

TINTO

N AV

SEAMAN AV

ANDE

RSON

AV

M DESB EXI T6

W 181 ST

MONR

OE AV

NAGLE AV

E 183 ST

WOODY

CRES

T AV

JENNINGS ST

FREEMAN ST

W FORDHAM RD

W 186 STW 185 ST

E 164 ST

W 168 ST

HRD

NBEX

IT24

W 183 ST

SUMM

IT AV

CROM

WELL

AV

WEEK

S AV

W 182 ST

PAYSON AV

W 190 STW 189 ST

VERMILYEA AV

W 188 ST

VYSE

AV

CLAREMONT PKWY

ISHAM ST

HENR

Y HUD

SON P

KWY

E 175 ST

E 194 ST

ACADEMY ST

W 166 ST

H ILLSIDE

AV

POPH

AM AV

E 158 ST

DR M L KING JR

BLVD

SIMPS

ON ST

W 180 ST

W 165 STHU

GHES

AV

W 169 ST

W 178 ST

FRAN

KLIN

AV

BAINBRIDGE AV

UNIVE

RSITY

AV

ARDEN ST

AQUE

DUCT

AV E

W 179 ST

E 177 ST

SELW

YN AV

TOWNS

END A

V

MARIO

N AV

LORIN

G PL S

CROTONA PARK N

W 177 ST

THAYER ST

AMST

ERDA

M AV

BAIL E

Y AV

COOPER ST

DAVID

SON A

V

CROTONA PARK E

HOME ST

PLIM

PTON

AV

HOE A

V

ANDREW

S AV N

CBE

NBEX

IT1 C

E 181 ST

EDWARD

L GRANT HWY

W TR EMONT AV

MERR

IAMAV

MONTGOMERY AV

W 176 ST

MACOMBS DAM BR

W 215 ST

ARTH

UR AV

ELLIOT PL

CLINT

ON AV

GRAN

DCO

NCOU

RSE

E 161 ST

E 178 ST

E 166 ST

MARCY PL

FTGEO

RGE HILLCB

E NBEX

IT1 D

LOUIS NINE BLVD

E 187 ST

W 206 ST

E 185 ST

MINF

ORD

PL

ECHO PL

E 163 ST

LA FO

NTAIN

E AV

WASHINGTON BR CART

ER AV

QUARRY RD

OVER

LOOK

TER

BRISTOW ST

W 164 ST

E 193 ST

ELLWOOD ST

LAUREL HILL

TER

FORE

ST AV

AQUE

DUCT

AV W

CHARLOTTE ST

CBE SB EXIT 1 C-D

W 205 ST

FAIRVIEW AV

W 211 ST

W 162 ST

KELLY ST

E BURNSIDE AV

MDE NB EXIT 7 N

SICKLES ST

CARR

OLL P

L

SOUT

HERN

BLVD

W 202 ST

MELR

OSE A

V

BASS

FORD

AV

RAMP

E 171 ST

E 197 ST

E 192 ST

W KINGSBRIDGE RD

E 162 ST

E 153 ST

EXTE

RIOR

ST

CLINTON PL

E 174 ST

E 190 ST

CLARKE PL E

W 192 ST

PHEL

AN PL

JACK

SON A

V

LORIN

G PL N

MDE NB EXIT 9

WYTHE

PL

W BURNSIDE AV

W 203 ST

ELM

PL

JUMEL

PL

W 201 STNORTH ST

MC CLELLAN ST

D EVOE T ER

E 186 ST

EVELYN PL

W 195 ST

TRINI

TY AV

FT W

ASHIN

GTON

AV

W 174 ST

TOPP

ING

AV

FT T RYON PL

CABR

INI

BLVD

W 155 ST

W 212 ST

CROTONA PARK S

W 173 ST

RU

PPERT PL

E 189 ST

MDE NB EXIT 7 S

SEAB

URY P

L

FOLIN

ST

E 188 ST

HALL OF FAME TER

STEBBINS AV

HRD

SBEX

IT23

BUCHANAN PL

POE P

L

E 157 ST

HEATH AV

E 176 ST

HALL

PL

FIELD PL

MONT

EREY

AV

W 19 6 ST

LYMAN PL

CHISHOLM ST

RIVE RSIDE DRTIFFANY ST

E 179 ST

UNNA

ME

D ST

OSBO

RNE P

L

W 175 ST

SHAK

E SPE

ARE

AV

FATHER ZEISER PL

W 172 ST

ITTNER PL

WFA

RMS RD

CAUL

DWEL

L AV

E 172 ST

FEATHERBED LA

W 213 ST

MOUNT HOPE PL

MDE

NB E

XIT 5

BELM

ONT AV

E 159 ST

FT GEORG E AV

TME N B EXIT1 B

W 193 ST

RITTER PL

STAFF

ST

EAST

BURN

AV

BOGARDUS PL

WEIHER CT

DONGAN PL

MDE NB

EXIT 8

E 182 ST

W 161 ST

ST PAUL'S PL

CLIFFORD PL

W 153 ST

INTE

RVAL

E AV

E 191 ST

TUDOR PL

CAMERON PL

GRAN

DVIEW

PL

W 171 ST

BUSH ST

MDE SB EXIT 9

W 214 ST

LANDING RD

E KINGSBRIDGE RD

CROT

ONA P

LCUMMING ST

DEPO

T PL A

PPR

HAMPDEN PL

MIRIAM ST

MDE S

B EN

DEPO

T PL

BRANDT PL

WILKINS AV

MORTON PL

JESUP PL

FREDDO

UGLA

SSBL

VD

E FORDHAM RD

ALDEN PL

E MOUNT EDEN AV

GRAN

D AV

PARK

AV

W 174 ST

E 167 ST

E 193 ST

E 1 65 ST

E 168 ST

TOPP

ING

AV

E 178 ST

E 164 ST

E 170 ST

W 193 ST

MARCY PL

RIVER

AV

SHER

MAN A

V

E 166 ST

E 181 ST

E 167 ST

E 178 ST

BELM

ONT A

VAR

THUR

AV

W 172 ST

HENR

Y HUDS

ONPK

WY

E 170 ST

MAJO

R DEEG

ANEX

WY

E 168 ST

E 175 ST

W TREMONT AV

E 162 ST

NAGLE AV

FULT

ON AV

W 1 77 ST

E 165 ST

E 173 ST

UNNAMED ST

E 179 ST

W 180 ST

E 174 ST

E 164 ST

E 180 ST

W 181 ST

E 171 ST

W 182 ST

9 AV

E 175 ST

E 166 ST

E 187 ST

E 188 ST

E 157 ST

CRES

TON AV

E 182 ST

ECHO PL

W 174 ST

TOWNS

END A

V

TIFFA

NYST

W 183 ST

E 176 STDAV

IDSON AV

W 174 ST

E 187 ST

INTERVA

LEAV

E 182 ST

LORIN

GPL

N

E 182 ST

W 182 ST

CROSS BRONX EXWY

MORR

IS AV

HARLEMRIVER

DR

W BURNSIDE AV

MORR

ISAV

W 192 ST

ANTH

ONY A

V

E 180 ST

E 167 ST

E 171 ST

E 181 ST

E 168 ST

PARK AV

W 192 ST

E 171 ST

E 176 ST

E 178 ST

E 166 ST

E 175 ST

E 173 ST

E 189 ST

E 163 ST

W 176 ST

E 179 ST

SOUT

HERN

BLV

D

MOUNT HOPE PL

E 187 ST

E 166 ST

HOME ST

PROSP

ECT A

V

MAJO

R DE

EGAN

EXWY

MARION AV

COLL

EGE A

V

E 178 ST

E 164 ST

ARTH

UR AV

E 162 ST

E 166 ST

FEATHERBED LA

E 162 ST

HOE A

V

BUSH ST

W 176 ST

E 176 ST

E 183 ST

BATH

GATE

AV

E 172 ST

E 179 ST

W 175 ST

W 175 ST

E 171 STE 170 ST

W 179 ST

E 174 ST

W 190 ST

E 176 ST

E 169 ST

CLINTO

N AV

E 181 ST

W 174 ST

W 184 ST

E 166 ST

EXTERIOR ST

ELM

PL

E 172 ST

0 1,000 2,000FeetF i g u r e 2 2 - 2

U N M I T I G A T E D S I G N I F I C A N T A D V E R S E I M P A C TT R A F F I C A N A L Y S I S L O C A T I O N SJerome Avenue Rezoning EIS

! Traffic Analysis!

Unmitigated Significant AdverseImpact Traffic Analysis LocationsRezoningProjectedPotential

¯N

Page 6: Chapter *22: Unavoidable Adverse Impacts - nyc.gov · As discussed in Chapter 13, ... Mt. Eden Avenue, ... The Proposed Actions would result in a capacity shortfall of the east and

New York City Department of City Planning

22-6

22.4 Construction

TRANSPORTATION

As described in Chapter 19, “Construction,” construction-related traffic would have no significant

adverse impacts during the weekday construction 6-7 AM peak hour and would have significant adverse

impacts at 13 intersections during the weekday construction PM peak hour (3-4 PM). Most significant

adverse impacts would be mitigated with the implementation of recommended mitigation measures,

but unmitigated significant adverse impacts remain at five intersections during the construction PM

peak hour. No basic intersection improvement measures could mitigate the significant adverse

construction-related impacts at these five intersections. These impacts would constitute unavoidable

significant adverse traffic impacts as a result of the Proposed Action.

HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES

The rezoning area is substantially contiguous to the Croton Aqueduct System at approximately West

183rd Street and also at approximately Ogden Avenue and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Boulevard (just

south of the Cross-Bronx Expressway). In each of these two areas, there is one potential development

site within 90 feet of the mapped Croton Aqueduct System/Aqueduct Walk; as described following, in

this chapter, it is presumed that appropriate protections would be in place during construction to

ensure that the aqueduct system and the public park would not experience construction-related

impacts.

Any designated NYCL or S/NR-listed historic buildings located within 90 linear feet of a projected or

potential new construction site are subject to the protections of the New York City Department of

Building’s (DOB’s) Technical Policy and Procedure Notice (TPPN) #10/88. In effect, this policy would

prevent construction-related impacts to properties within the Grand Concourse Historic District that

would be within 90 feet of potential development sites 75, 76, and 77. Therefore, no construction

impacts to the Grand Concourse Historic District would result with the Proposed Actions. There are no

projected or potential development sites within the Morris Avenue Historic District, and the nearest site

that would be developed with the Proposed Actions would be Potential Development Site 43, which is

located approximately 170 feet southwest of the historic district boundary; therefore, the Proposed

Actions would result in no construction impacts to the Morris Avenue Historic District.

As described following, in this chapter, one projected development site and four potential development

sites are located within approximately 90 feet of the U.S. Post Office – Morris Heights Station (S/NR-

eligible). As defined in the procedure notice TPPN #10/88, “historic resources” that are considered

adjacent to construction activities, only include designated NYCLs and S/NR-listed properties that are

Page 7: Chapter *22: Unavoidable Adverse Impacts - nyc.gov · As discussed in Chapter 13, ... Mt. Eden Avenue, ... The Proposed Actions would result in a capacity shortfall of the east and

Jerome Avenue Rezoning EIS

Chapter 22: Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

22-7

within 90 feet of a lot under development or alteration. They do not include S/NR-eligible, NYCL-

eligible, potential, or unidentified architectural resources. Without the particular protections of TPPN

#10/88, or similar protections in place, the Proposed Actions could result in construction impacts on the

U.S. Post Office – Morris Heights Station, with the development of potential development sites 96 and

97, the boundaries of which are nearly adjacent to the post office building structure.

NOISE

As discussed in Chapter 19, “Construction,” construction activities associated with the Proposed Action

would occur on multiple development sites within the same geographic area and, as a result, has the

potential to increase interior noise levels of existing adjacent commercial and residential buildings.

These increases would likely approach or marginally exceed the impact threshold for short periods of

time. The same potential to exceed the noise limits exist during other construction quarters bordering

the peak construction period

The findings indicate that noise levels above the CEQR impact threshold are expected at several existing

buildings adjacent to Projected Development Sites 33,34,35,36 and to Projected Development Sites

43,44,45. For Projected Development Sites 33,34,35,36 the highest noise levels are projected to be at

top-level receptor locations adjacent to existing commercial and residential buildings on Cromwell

Street between West Clarke Place and East 170th Street. For Projected Development Sites 43,44,45 the

highest noise levels are projected to be at mid-level receptor locations adjacent to existing residential

buildings o Gerard Street between McLellan Street and West 167th Street.

Although these locations are expected to experience exterior noise levels significantly above CEQR

limits, for those buildings with double‐paned glazed‐glass windows and a closed ventilation system, it

would keep interior noise levels for those buildings below or near the CEQR 50‐dBA L10 impact

threshold for commercial buildings and the CEQR 45‐dBA L10 impact threshold for residential buildings.

The interior noise levels of these adjacent buildings would likely approach or marginally exceed the

CEQR L10 impact thresholds for short periods of time. The same potential for noise impacts also exist for

similar noise‐level increases at these and/or other receptor locations in the immediate vicinity of Project

Development Sites 33,34,35,36 and 43,44,45 during other construction quarters bordering this peak

construction period (i.e., second quarter of 2018 and third quarter of 2022). If the peak construction

scenario conservatively assumed for simultaneous construction on Project Development Sites

33,34,35,36 and 43,44,45, the Proposed Action would result in a significant adverse construction noise

impact.

Page 8: Chapter *22: Unavoidable Adverse Impacts - nyc.gov · As discussed in Chapter 13, ... Mt. Eden Avenue, ... The Proposed Actions would result in a capacity shortfall of the east and

New York City Department of City Planning

22-8

Noise Reduction Measures

Construction of the Proposed Projected would be required to follow the requirements of the NYC Noise

Control Code for construction noise control measures. Specific noise control measures would be

incorporated in noise mitigation plan(s) required under the NYC Noise Code. These measures could

include a variety of source and path controls.

The following proposed mitigation measures go beyond the noise control measures already identified in

Chapter 19, “Construction,” and may partially mitigate significant adverse impacts (and substantially

reduce construction-related noise levels) at some locations:

Noise barriers constructed from plywood or other materials at a height of 12 to 16 feet utilized

to provide shielding;

Utilization of isolation pads between pile driver hammer and piles;

Acoustical shrouds surrounding the pile driver hammer and piles;

Electric cranes or cranes with exhaust silencers that have lower noise emission levels; and

Excavators with exhaust silencers that have lower noise emission levels.

Between the DEIS and FEIS, the above mitigation measures, which are intended to address the pieces of

construction equipment that would produce the highest noise levels, were explored and it was found

that there are no reasonable means to ensure measures be employed that would fully mitigate the

significant adverse construction noise impacts. The proposed measures discussed above are considered

partial mitigations only. Consequently, these impacts would not be completely eliminated and they

would constitute an unmitigated significant adverse construction noise impact.