Chapter 20 Managing Vertical Relationships COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The...
-
Upload
virginia-anthony -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
4
Transcript of Chapter 20 Managing Vertical Relationships COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The...
![Page 1: Chapter 20 Managing Vertical Relationships COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and South-Western.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649eec5503460f94bfe6b2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Chapter 20Managing Vertical Relationships
COPYRIGHT © 2008Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and South-Western are trademarks used herein under license.
![Page 2: Chapter 20 Managing Vertical Relationships COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and South-Western.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649eec5503460f94bfe6b2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Review of Chapter 19
Companies are principals trying to get their divisions (agents) to work profitably in the interests of the parent company.
Transfer pricing does not merely transfer profit from one division to another; it can result in the movement of assets to lower-value uses. Efficient transfer prices are set equal to the opportunity cost of the asset being transferred.
A profit center on top of another profit center can result in too few goods being sold; one common way of addressing this problem is to change one of the profit centers into a cost center.
![Page 3: Chapter 20 Managing Vertical Relationships COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and South-Western.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649eec5503460f94bfe6b2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Review of Chapter 19 (cont.)
Companies with functional divisions share functional expertise within a division and can more easily evaluate and reward division employees. However, change is costly, and senior management must coordinate the activities of the various divisions.
Process teams are built around a multi-function task and are evaluated based on the success of the project on which they are working.
When divisions are rewarded for reaching a budget threshold, they have an incentive to lie to make the threshold as low as possible to make sure they get their bonuses. In addition, they will often pull sales into the present, and push costs into the future, to make sure they reach the threshold level.
![Page 4: Chapter 20 Managing Vertical Relationships COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and South-Western.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649eec5503460f94bfe6b2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Anecdote: Large Power Company Electricity sold to customers at rates regulated by the state
“PUC” Allowed to earn nine percent return on capital
The Power Company is contemplating purchasing the Coal Mine that supplies them with coal Form a multi-divisional company Direct the Coal Division to raise the transfer price of coal sold to the
Power Division Increase in the price of coal raises the marginal cost of producing
electricity Under the profit regulation, allows the Power Division to raise
electricity prices Coal Mining Division earns more on the coal it sells Power Division is allowed to raise the regulated price of electricity so
that its profit does not fall In other words, the Coal Mine is more valuable as a sister
division to the Power Company, than it is as an independent company
![Page 5: Chapter 20 Managing Vertical Relationships COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and South-Western.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649eec5503460f94bfe6b2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Caveat: Beware Acquisitions
Do NOT buy a customer or supplier simply because they are profitable
Without some kind of synergy, the value of the upstream supplier or competitor is exactly equal to the size of its profit stream – not moving assets to higher value uses
Discussion: AT&T Cable Acquisitions
![Page 6: Chapter 20 Managing Vertical Relationships COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and South-Western.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649eec5503460f94bfe6b2/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Evading Regulation Motive
One of the simplest and easiest-to-understand reasons for vertical integration
If there is unrealized profit at one stage of the vertical supply chain – as happens when there are regulations preventing one firm from earning higher profit – vertical integration, tying, or bundling can give the regulated firm a way to evade regulation and earn higher profit
Discussion: Rent Control Discussion: Multi-National Companies
![Page 7: Chapter 20 Managing Vertical Relationships COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and South-Western.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649eec5503460f94bfe6b2/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Solving the Double-Markup Problem Discussion: Gasoline refiners selling branded
gasoline This problem can be analyzed more generally as a
prisoners’ dilemma faced by any two firms in the same vertical supply chain or by any two firms selling complementary goods
The double markup problem occurs when firms selling complementary products set price in competition with each other
Vertical integration is one way of addressing the double marginalization problem – commonly owned firms can coordinate more easily on lower prices to raise profit
![Page 8: Chapter 20 Managing Vertical Relationships COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and South-Western.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649eec5503460f94bfe6b2/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Aligning Retailer Incentives with Manufacturer Goals Discussion: Getting retailers to invest in demand-enhancing
services With a smaller profit slice, retailers may under-invest Hard to write complete contracts to cover all cases Intra-brand competition can be controlled by means such as
granting exclusive territories, setting minimum retail prices, etc. Guarantees retailers a higher profit level creates incentive to
provide demand-increasing services Examples??
Limiting intra-brand competition also helps reduce free-riding Many of these tactics may be illegal under antitrust laws
Especially for companies with dominant market shares
![Page 9: Chapter 20 Managing Vertical Relationships COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and South-Western.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649eec5503460f94bfe6b2/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Price Discrimination
Two separate consumer groups who use same product in different manners
Integrating downstream can allow manufacturer to price discriminate
Example: Herbicide users (home gardeners and farmers)
Price discrimination at the wholesale level is much more difficult (and may be illegal)
![Page 10: Chapter 20 Managing Vertical Relationships COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and South-Western.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649eec5503460f94bfe6b2/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Outsourcing
The opposite of vertical integration – but decisions should employ the same logic
Outsource an activity to an upstream supplier or downstream customer only if they can do it better or more cheaply than you
Typical reason is to gain advantages of economies of scale or scope
Consider whether you are sacrificing any integration benefits before you outsource
![Page 11: Chapter 20 Managing Vertical Relationships COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and South-Western.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649eec5503460f94bfe6b2/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Alternate Intro Anecdote The Aluminum Company of America (Alcoa) was the only
domestic supplier of aluminum ingots prior to 1930, which were used for a variety of purposes An addition to the production process in the iron and steel
industry, used to improve the quality of the final product. Manufacture of cooking utensils Production of electric cable Automobile and aircraft parts constituted the final two end
markets. Consumers in these diverse markets varied widely in their
willingness to pay for aluminum ingots. Demand for aluminum in the iron/steel industry and in the aircraft
industry was relatively inelastic In the other three industries, demand was much more elastic
![Page 12: Chapter 20 Managing Vertical Relationships COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and South-Western.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649eec5503460f94bfe6b2/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Alternate Intro Anecdote (cont.) The potential for arbitrage created a barrier to
implementing a scheme to increase prices to iron/steel and aircraft consumers while generally reducing price to the other three markets.
To successfully implement its price discrimination scheme, Alcoa was forced to forward integrate into the three relatively elastic markets.
By moving into the cookware, electric cable, and automotive parts markets, Alcoa gained control over potential resales of aluminum ingot and was able to maintain high prices to the iron/steel and aircraft parts markets.