CHAPTER 2 Review of Literature -...
Transcript of CHAPTER 2 Review of Literature -...
12
CHAPTER 2
Review of Literature
13
2.1. Pesticide residues in soil, water and plants
Contamination of the soil, water and air with pesticides is a social and
economical matter of concern to all. Use of metal-based inorganic and
hard pesticides like organochlorines attracted widespread opposition due
to their persistent and polluting nature. Strong public movements
opposing the indiscriminate use of pesticides started in the early sixties.
The widespread use of DDT was found to be harmful to the ecosystem.
The famous book ‘Silent Spring’ deals entirely with the environmental
impact caused by DDT. However the use of pesticides in modern
agricultural technology has become a unavoidable evil. The danger of
using such poisons in agriculture is still not known fully to many farmers.
Many reports are available on the presence of pesticide residues in soil,
water and their spread and transportation to plants and surroundings.
Reports are also emerging on the level of pesticide residues present in
agricultural products. The pesticide residues are also reported to be
present in non-agricultural products for public consumption like meat,
fish and milk. The surface water samples from Nilgiris in India were
analysed for the residues of carbofuran, quinalphos and phorate by K
Bhuvaneswari et. al. [1]. The percent occurrence of insecticide residues
observed in the samples was 60.6 for carbofuran. The insecticide residues
were detected in the range of 50 to 1200 ng/lit for carbofuran. This
happens because of the persistent nature of the pesticides. DDT, BHC,
aldrin, heptachlor and endosulfan are some of the long persisting
organochlorine group of pesticides. These find their way into cereals,
vegetables, fruits, and oil seeds from soil and water in the environment.
14
Data on pesticide residues from selected fields are being generated by
various agricultural universities and Indian Council of Agricultural
Research Institutions in the country (ICAR’s). The All India Coordinated
Research Project on Pesticide Residues sponsored by ICAR has further
accelerated the pace of research in this area [2, 3, 4].
Many chlorinated pesticides like DDT, BHC, aldrin and endrin, which are
non-biodegradable and soil, plant, water and air, the four co-ordinated
components of the environment are the first victims of pesticide
contamination. Human beings and animals are affected directly during the
handling of the pesticide products and also indirectly through the food
chain.
The chemical affects the air through its volatilization followed by wind
action. They further migrate from the site of application and reach ground
water by percolation and leaching through soil. DDT, BHC, Aldrin, and
Entrin, which are non-biodegradable and highly persistent, undergo
bioaccumulation and grow to fatal levels [5,6,7].
Analysis of agricultural products in various parts of India showed the
widespread contamination of materials of human consumption with
pesticide residues. It was found that out of 313 vegetable samples analyzed in
Mumbai, more than 50 % contained residues of HCH, lindane, DDT, aldrin
and endrin. It was also observed that leafy vegetables and potatoes contained
higher amount of residues. In Delhi, 80 % of vegetable samples tested had
pesticide residues in them. Those were samples analyzed from places like
Haryana, UP and Maharashtra.
15
Ground water, which is expected to be free from contamination, also
reported the presence of pesticide residue. Recent reports have indicated
that in Delhi area, ground water is contaminated by pesticides like Atrazin
and chloropyrifos [8]. The National Symposium on ‘Pesticides’ ‘Myths
Realities and Remedies’ held in New Delhi in 2004 had highlighted the
issue of pesticide residues in soil, water and agricultural crops as well as
the role of microorganisms in their degradation. The presence of
organochlorine pesticide residues in milk and milk products was reported
by Anoop and coworkers [3] and J. Rao [9]. The presence of residues of
chloropyriphos and mono chrotophos in paddy and non-target organisms
was reported. Several studies were carried out on pesticides residues in crops
like cotton, brinjal, onion, apple, mango, chilli, coconut and tea [10].
Pesticide, on application to agricultural fields leaches into small streams
and reaches rivers and ultimately ocean. This endangers aquatic life.
These are several reports on the contamination of river water by pesticide
residues. Reports on pesticide contamination of water sources like rivers,
ponds and lakes show that most of them are related to contamination by
organochlorines like HCH, heptachlor, aldrin and DDT. Some reports are
also related to endosulfan, malathion, parathion, dimethoate and ethion,
the last four belonging to organophosphorous group.
2.2 Classification of Pesticides
2.2.1. Classification based on usage.
Depending on the purpose for which they are used, pesticides are divided
into following basic groups.
16
1. Acaricides - for the control of mites and ticks.
2. Algicides - for the destruction of algae and
other aquatic vegetation.
3. Arboricides - for the destruction of undesirable
arbored and bushy vegetation.
4. Bactericides - for the control bacteria and
bacterial diseases of plants.
5. Fungicides - for the control of plant diseases
and various fungi.
6. Herbicides (Weedicide) - for the control of weeds.
7. Insecticides - for the control of harmful insects.
Individual groups of insecticides also have more specific names such as
aphicides, preparations for the control of aphids.
Limacides or molluskicides - for the control of various
mollusks, including gastropods.
Nematicides - for the control of nematodes
Zoocides - for the control of rodents. Materials
of this group are often called
rodenticides
17
2.2.2. Classification based on chemistry
Pesticides are also classified based on the chemical group under which
they fall. A few examples are as follows:
1. Organo chlorines
2. Organo phosphates
3. Carbamates
4. Pyrethroids
5. Nicotinoids
6. Rotenoids
Organochlorines
As the name indicates, the organo chlorines are insecticides that contain
carbon, chlorine and hydrogen. They are also referred to by other names
like chlorinated hydrocarbons, chlorinated organics, chlorinated
insecticides, and chlorinated synthetics.
One of the most important organo chlorine pesticide introduced in the
early forties is DDT which was first synthesized by Zeidler in 1874.The
chemical was used in the initial years by British army to control body lice.
Later the chemical found wide application in the health programme to
control mosquitoes causing malaria. It is chemically known as 1, 1, 1-
trichloro-2, 2-bis (p-chloro phenyl) ethane. DDT belongs to the chemical
class of diphenyl aliphatic, and as the name indicates, it consists of an
aliphatic or straight carbon chain, with two (di-) phenyl rings attached.
18
DDT was first known chemically as p,p’ dichloro diphenyl tri chloro
ethane, hence DDT Structure 2.1.
Chemical Structure 2.1. Chemical Structure of DDT
It is nearly insoluble in water but has a good solubility in
most organic solvents, fats, and oils. Trade names that DDT has been
marketed under include Anofex, Cezarex, Chlorophenothane,
Clofenotane, Dicophane, Dinocide, Gesarol, Guesapon, Guesarol, Gyron,
Ixodex, Neocid, Neocidol, and Zerdane [11]. From 1950 to 1980, DDT was
extensively used in agriculture—more than 40,000 tonnes were used each
year worldwide [12] and it has been estimated that a total of 1.8 million
tonnes have been produced globally since the 1940s [13]. Today, 4-5,000
tonnes are used globally each year for the control of malaria and visceral
leishmaniasis. India is the largest consumer. India, China, and North
Korea are the only countries that still produce and export. Production is
reportedly rising [14].
DDT is suspected to cause cancer. The NTP classifies it as "reasonably
anticipated to be a carcinogen," the International Agency for Research on
Cancer classifies it as a "possible" human carcinogen, and the EPA
classifies DDT, DDE, and DDD as class B2 "probable" carcinogens.
19
These evaluations are based mainly on the results of animal studies [13,15].
There is evidence from epidemiological studies (i.e. studies in human
populations) that indicates that DDT causes cancers of the liver [15, 16],
pancreas [15, 16] and breast [16]. There is mixed evidence that it contributes
to leukemia[16], lymphoma [16, 17] and testicular cancer [15,16,18].
Cyclodienes
Cyclodiene chlorinated insecticides are cyclic compounds having
methane-bridged structure substituted with chlorine atoms. These dienes
are prepared by Diels-Alder reaction. The starting material for the
preparation of cyclodiene is hexachlorocyclopentadiene [HCCP]. e.g.:
chlordene, chlordane, aldrin, isodrin, endrin and endosulfan.
Organophosphorus pesticides
Organo phosphorus pesticides are esters of phosphorus acids like
phosphinous, phosphinic, phosphonous, phosphonic, phosphorous and
phosphoric acids and their thio analogues. Organophosphorus compounds
show activity against variety of crop pests. These can be broadly
classified as insecticides, acaricides, nematicides, herbicides including
defoliants and plant growth regulators, fungicides and chemosterilants.
They degrade fast in nature. Malathion, methyl parathion, hinosan,
phorate are some of the pesticides, which belong to organophosphorus
group [19].
Carbamate insecticides
Carbamates are important group of synthetic compounds with high
insecticidal activity and a reasonable rate of biodegradation. The idea of
20
developing carbamate insecticides came from the alkaloid physostigmine,
an active ingredient of calaban beans. Based on the structure of this
alkaloid, attempts were made to synthesize a series of N-substituted
carbamate molecules for screening as insecticides.
The base for all carbamates is carbamic acid [structure 2.2] the mono
amide of carbon dioxide, which is unstable in free form but decomposes
to CO2 and NH3 .On the other hand; salts of carbamic acid, called
carbamates are very stable [structure 2.3]. One such stable salt is
ammonium carbamates, used as commercial insecticide and rodenticide
along with aluminium phosphide. Carbamic acid can be stabilized by
formation of a simple alkyl ester such as ethyl carbamate known as
urethane [structure 2.4]. This is used as bactericide and co solvent for
pesticides, but is carcinogenic in nature. In addition to alkyl esters, aryl
esters of carbamic acid are also prepared. One such compound is phenyl
carbamate [structure 2.5].
HO-CO-NH2 +NH4 O
- CO-NH2 C2H5O-CO-NH2 C 6 H 5 O-CO-NH2
[structure 2.2] [structure 2.3] [structure 2.4] [structure 2.5]
Some other examples of carbamate pesticides are carbaryl, carbofuran,
carbosulfan, aldicarb and oxamyl.
Carbofuran is one of the most toxic carbamate pesticides. It is
marketed under the trade names Furadan, by FMC Corporation and Curater,
among several others. It is used to control insects in a wide variety of field
crops, including potatoes, corn and soybeans. It is a systemic insecticide,
which means that the plant absorbs it through the roots, and from here the
plant distributes it throughout its organs where insecticidal concentrations
21
are attained. Carbofuran also has contact activity against pests.
Carbofuran usage has increased in recent years because it is one of the
few insecticides effective on soybean aphids, which have expanded their
range since 2002 to include most soybean-growing regions of
the U.S. The main global producer is the FMC Corporation.
Carbofuran is banned in Canada and the European Union. In 2008,
the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced
that it intends to ban carbofuran [20]. In December of that year, FMC
Corp., the sole US manufacturer of carbofuran, announced that it had
voluntarily requested that the United States Environmental Protection
Agency cancel all but 6 of the previously allowed uses of that chemical as
a pesticide. With this change, carbofuran usage in the US would be
allowed only on maize, potatoes, pumpkins, sunflowers, pine seedlings
and spinach grown for seed [21]. However, in May 2009 EPA cancelled
all food tolerances, an action which amounts to a de facto ban on its use
on all crops grown for human consumption [22]. In Kenya farmers are
using carbofuran to kill lions and other predators [23, 24]. Kenya also is
considering banning carbofuran [25].
Pyrethroid insecticides
Natural pyrethroids are the most ideal and safer insecticides among
pesticides of natural origin. The production of natural pyrethrum extract is
limited because of the shortage of chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium plant,
which requires specific agro-climatic conditions to grow. Owing to the
high demand of pyrethrins, the chemists have all along been interested in
developing synthetic analogues with high potency, selectivity,
photostability and low mammalian toxicity. Pyrethroids are toxic to fish
22
and other aquatic organisms. At extremely small levels, such as 2 parts
per trillion [26] pyrethroids are lethal to mayflies, gadflies, and
invertebrates that constitute the base of many aquatic and terrestrial food
webs [27]. They are usually broken apart by sunlight and the atmosphere
in one or two days, and do not significantly affect ground waterquality
[28]. Chemical and spectroscopic evidences showed that cyclopentenyl
ring in the pyrethrin molecule was the most probable site of photo
induced oxidative decomposition.
2.2.3. Miscellaneous insecticides
Nitromethylene heterocycles
Soloway et al. screened a series of nitromethylene heterocyclics and
found that 2-(nitro methylene) tetra hydro 1, 3- thiazin analogues
exhibited good insecticidal activity with low mammalian toxicity and less
persistence. But these compounds are photolabile. To make a photo stable
product, a formyl derivative of nitro methylene was synthesized with
reasonable photo stability and wide spectrum of insecticidal activity.
These compounds also exhibited activity against insects resistant to other
pesticides.
2.3. Chemicals containing metals in use as pesticides
Some of the pesticides, which contain metals, are listed in Table 2.1.
23
Table 2.1.Chemicals containing metals in use as pesticides: [29]
Chemical Metal composition of
Product Crops
Insecticides
Copperaceto-arsenite
(Paris green) 2.3% As, 39% Cu
Apples and cherries,
vegetables and small fruits
Calcium arsenate 0.8-26% As Fruit and vegetables
Lead arsenate 4.2-9.1% As,
11-26% Pb
Apples, Cherries, Peaches,
vegetables
Mercuric chloride 6% Hg Cruciferous crops
Zinc sulphate 20% Zn Peaches
Fungicides
Copper sulphate-
Calcium salts
(Bordeaux and
Burgundy mixtures)
4-6% Cu Fruit and vegetables
Fixed copper salts 2-56% Cu Fruit and vegetables
Ferbam 0.5-12% Fe Vegetables
Fruit
Maneb 1-17% Mn Fruit and vegetables
Mancozeb 16% Mn, 2% Zn Fruit and vegetables
Methyl and phenyl
Mercuric salts 0.6-6% Hg Seed treatment
Phenyl mercuric
Acetate
6% Hg Apples
Zinels and ziram 1-18% Zn Vegetables
Fruit
Calcium arsenite 30%As Vegetables
Sodium arsenite 26% As Vegetables
24
2.4 Use of Pesticides in Indian Agriculture
The pesticides have proved to be effective tools to protect the crops from
tremendous losses caused by pests and diseases and paved the way for
green revolution. In modern agricultural technology, benefit of all the
important inputs will be easily lost if the crop is not well protected from
pests and diseases High yielding varieties are often more prone to pests
and diseases and hence require a “pesticide umbrella” for an optimum
yield.
Pesticide science is barely 60 years old in India. Prior to 1930, little
pesticides were used. But the discovery of insecticidal properties of DDT
completely revolutionized the pest control operations. Upto 1966, most of
the pesticides used were in public sector but from 1967 onwards when
high yielding varieties responsive to fertilizers and irrigation were
introduced, the pesticide consumption in agriculture increased
significantly.
2.4.1. Agricultural production and use of pesticides in India
However, total pesticide consumption has gone up to 119.2 thousand
tones in 1990. The agricultural production and amount of pesticides used
annually from 1960 to 1985 are given in Table 2.2.
25
Table 2.2. Year-wise agricultural production & use of pesticides in
India [30]
Year
Total
production of
food grain
(MT)
Pesticides used in
agriculture
(1000 T)
Pesticides in
public health
(1000 T)
Total
pesticides
consumption
(1000 T)
1960 80 2.0 21.0 23.0
1968 74 7.4 9.6 17.1
1970 108 10.2 8.8 19.0
1975 121 43.4 15.2 58.6
1980 126 40.6 15.5 56.1
1981 129 48.0 16.8 64.8
1982 133 53.0 19.3 72.3
1983 129 64.0 17.8 81.8
1984 151 68.0 20.6 88.6
1985 153 72.0 19.2 91.2
If we look at the consumption of pesticides in different states of India,
Andra Pradesh is found to be using maximum pesticides followed by
Tamil Nadu, U.P., Punjab and West Bengal. But on the basis of per
hectare cropped area, the highest amount of pesticide is used in Tamil
Nadu (1.8Kg) followed by Punjab (0.87 Kg), Andra Pradesh (0.83 Kg)
and Haryana (0.8kg). The increase in pesticide consumption per unit
cropped area may be due to the development of resistance and over-
26
utilization of pesticides due to the lack of proper knowledge about the
hazards
2.4.2. Crop wise consumption of pesticides
The amount of pesticides applied to various crops at farmers level is
shown in Table 2.3. This shows the severity of pests on different crops.
Table 2.3. Crop wise consumption of pesticides
Crop Cropped area
covered (%)
Pesticides used
(%)
Cost (Rs) (Crores)
1980 1986
Cotton 5 54 139 250
Rice 24 17 102 100
Vegetables and fruits 3 13 39 100
Plantation 2 8 15 40
Cereals, millets,
pulses and oil seeds
58 2 15 30
Sugarcane 2 3 19 40
Others 6 3 14 20
Total cost 343 540
2.4.3. Consumption of pesticides in different states of India
If we look at the consumption of pesticides in different states of India
(Table 2.4), Anthra Pradesh is found to be using maximum amount of
pesticides, which is followed by Tamil Nadu, UP, Punjab and West
Bengal. But on the basis of per hectre cropped area, the highest amount of
pesticide is used in Tamil Nadu (1.8Kg) followed by Punjab (0.87 Kg),
Anthra Pradesh (0.83 Kg) and Haryana (0.8 Kg). The increase in pesticide
27
consumption per unit cropped area may be due to the development of
resistance and over-utilization of pesticide due to lack of proper
knowledge about the hazards and the requirement of pesticides.
Table 2.4. Consumption of pesticides in different states of India [31]
State / Union territory
Consumption
1974-75 1986-87
Total Per ha (Kg) Total Per ha (Kg)
Andhra Pradesh 10,030 0.7 12,000 0.83
Assam 155 0.1 650 0.42
Bihar 3,000 0.3 3,000 0.3
Gujarat 800 0.1 5,000 0.63
Haryana 2,400 0.5 3,800 0.80
Himachal Pradesh 315 0.3 300 0.3
Jammu and Kashmir 78 0.1 500 0.64
Karnataka 2,472 0.2 4,200 0.34
Kerala 586 0.2 1,200 0.40
Madhya Pradesh 3,422 0.2 4,000 0.23
Maharashtra 3,500 0.2 4,100 0.23
Manipur 17 0.1 48 0.28
Meghalaya 15 0.1 50 0.33
Nagaland 6 0.1 20 0.33
Orissa 1,000 0.1 1,600 0.16
Punjab 3,300 0.6 4,800 0.87
Rajasthan 1,000 0.1 2,600 0.26
Tamil Nadu 1,070 0.2 11,600 1.8
Uttar Pradesh 6,000 0.3 120 0.6
West Bengal 1,800 0.2 5,000 0.56
Others 254
28
2.5. Environmental Implications of Pesticide Use
2.5.1. Harmful effects of pesticides
Pesticides are inherently poisonous chemicals. One has to take proper
precautions and care during their use. Accidental casualties from the
misuse of pesticides are often reported from several places in India.
Contamination of food commodities with insecticides like parathion,
DDT, BHC, endrin etc.are matter of serious concern. Beginning with
merely two or three laboratories in the mid sixties, today we have 30 well-
equipped laboratories (ICAR, CSIR, ICMR, Agricultural Universities)
engaged in pesticide residues analysis.
Owing to Issues regarding the harmful effects of pesticides on human
beings and other living organisms, a Pesticide Information Project of
Cooperative Extension Offices of Cornell University, Oregon State
University, the University of Idaho, and the University of California at
Davis and the Institute for Environmental Toxicology, Michigan State
University was carried out [32,33] [12,13]. The environmental protection
agency (EPA) has initiated a ban on all granular formulations of
carbofuran, which became effective on September 1, 1994. The ban was
established to protect birds because birds ingested carbofuran granules,
which resemble grain seeds. There is no ban on liquid formulations of
carbofuran, which are classified as Restricted Use Pesticides (RUP)
because of their acute oral and inhalation toxicity to humans. The harmful
nature of the liquid formulations forced the manufacturers to give the
signal word "Danger." Granular formulations were given the signal word
"Caution" [34] [14]. The ban was justified by the Toxicological Effects
such as Acute toxicity. Risks from exposure to carbofuran are especially
29
high for persons with asthma, diabetes, cardiovascular disease,
mechanical obstruction of the gastrointestinal or urogenital tracts, or those
in vagotonic states [35] [15].
The toxicity of carbofuran was reviewed by Gupta etc. al [36] [16]. The
review describes the contamination of food, water, and air with the pesticide.
Adverse health effects in humans, animals, wildlife, and fish are also
reviewed. The literature on chemical properties, acute toxicity data,
poisoning incidences, pharmacokinetics, and mechanism of toxicity of
carbofuran is briefly discussed giving emphasis to its two major metabolites
(3-hydroxycarbofuran and 3-ketocarbofuran) on overall toxicity.
Biochemical (cholinergic and noncholinergic), hematological, and
immunological effects induced by carbofuran are discussed in detail.
Carbofuran causes burns to the skin or eyes, therefore eye protection is
necessary when handling carbofuran. A respirator should be worn by
applicators of carbofuran. It also causes cholinesterase inhibition in both
humans and test animals [37-39] [17-19].
The subchronic toxicity of carbofuran in rats was investigated by Brki´c et al.
[40] [20]. The results of the studies revealed that the carbofuran administered
caused a significant decrease in water consumption as well as in brain,
serum and erythrocyte cholinesterase activities. Statistically significant
increases in serum enzyme activities were found in the test animals. The
haematological data showed that carbofuran had no significant effect on
Hb concentration and total RBC, but total WBC showed a significant
statistical decrease. The histopathological changes in liver and kidneys
were observed but were followed by cell regeneration. Reproductive
effects noted were: weak mutagenic effects, carcinogenic effects in
30
animals, organ toxicity, and is responsible for many ill fates in humans
and animals. Other ecological effects noticed are effects on birds (Lethal
dose in Japanese quail is 746 ppm) [41, 42] [21, 22].
Effects on aquatic organisms, carbofuran may be teratogenic to frogs
(Toxicol). Lett. 22(1):7- 13.1984). It is very toxic to trout, Coho salmon,
perch (Hdbk. Acut. Tox. Chem. Fish & Aqua. Invert. 1980), bluegills),
and catfish (Toxicology 23(4):337-345.1982). The 96-hour LD50 for fish
is 150 ug/L. [43] [23]. The acute Toxicity of Carbofuran to selected
species of aquatic and terrestrial organisms (the guppy Poecilia reticulata
Peters, the water flea Daphnia magna Straus and the green algae
Raphidocelis subcapitata Korsikov), and to a terrestrial organism (a white
mustard Sinapis albaLinné) was investigated by Radka DOBŠÍKOVÁ
[44] [24]. The results of the study [44] [24] revealed that Daphnia magna
is very sensitive to carbofuran residues. This study indicated the need to
protect the natural surface waters from the release of pesticides like
carbofuran even if it occurs accidentally.
Some recent development in pest control chemicals are highlighted
below:
2.5.2. Development of resistance in insect pests
Many pests will initially be very susceptible to pesticides, but some with
slight variations in their genetic makeup are resistant and therefore
survive to reproduce. Through natural selection, the pests may eventually
become very resistant to the pesticide. The indiscriminate use of
pesticides has led to the emergence of more virulent pests that have
developed an in- built resistance to some of the frequently used
31
chemicals. This problem has culminated in an outbreak of several
secondary pests to the extent that several minor pests have assumed the
status of major pests. In India, resistance in insects to pyrethroid group of
insecticides has created problems in the control of Heliothis armigera,
Plutella xylostella and Spodoptera litura. This problem can be managed
by suitably integrating synthetic and botanical pesticides along with other
cultural and biological control measures in integrated pest management
programmes.
Pest resistance to a pesticide is commonly managed through pesticide
rotation, which involves alternating among pesticide classes with different
modes of action to delay the onset of or mitigate existing pest resistance [45].
2.5.3. Development of leads from nature
Nature has always provided leads for the development of new dyes, drugs
and pesticides. The synthetic pyrethroids, carbamates, the JH mimics and
many plant growth regulators are the result of follow up of such leads.
The continued search for new pest control chemicals resulted in the
discovery of many unknown pesticides of plant origin. So far, several
thousands of natural products / biochemicals extracted from plants have
been screened at random. Among these, only a few have shown good
potential as pesticides. These include natural pyrethrins, rotenoids and
nicotinoids etc. A few compounds with moderate insecticidal activity like
coumarins, unsaturated isobutyl amides have also been discovered.
The neem tree (Azadirachta indica), a versatile plant contains some
biologically active chemicals called limonoids. Scientists have isolated
several limonoids from seeds, bark and leaves of neem. These limonoids
32
have different modes of action. It has been possible for neem products to
control more than 200 species of insects, mites and nematodes. Despite
advances in technology and understanding of biological systems, drug
discovery is still a lengthy, "expensive, difficult, and inefficient process"
with low rate of new therapeutic discovery [46].
2.5.4. Pesticides in soil
Pesticide in soil can reduce soil fertility. According to a report by US
researchers, the pesticides developed for boosting the crop yield were
found to be acting in the reverse way in the long term [47]. A survey of
orchard and vineyard soils in Ontario, Canada has revealed the extent of
accumulation and persistence of many inorganic pesticides and some
organo chlorine and organophosphorus pesticides. The concentration of
arsenic (As), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg) and copper (Cu) are elevated as a
result of prolonged use of these elements as fungicides. Residues of
organo chlorine pesticides like DDT are found in substantial quantity in
soil. Presence of organophosphorus pesticides in traces is also reported.
Pesticide behavior in soil can be simulated in a computer model to study
the rate of leaching through the upper layer of soil in the case of a potato
crop growing in a Sandy loam soil. Calculated leaching is dependent on
decomposition rates and adsorption strengths, and ranges from virtually
none to 10% of the dosage or more for compounds with high persistence
and mobility. Both decomposition and uptake by plants are important
factors in reducing leaching.
Application of PMA sprays to an apple orchard followed by soil residue
examination shows that Hg residues are almost entirely confined to the
33
top five centimeters of the soil. Dieldrin lost from the soil is found in leaves,
which absorb the pesticide from the vapour phase. The nitro aniline herbicide
benefin readily volatilizes and undergoes photodecomposition.
2.5.5. Pesticides in water
Pesticide content of water will be of great importance in determining the
use of that water. Factors involved are the relative occurrences and levels
of pesticides in solution, adsorbed on solids, or present in the flora and
fauna. An example of the importance of water quality is revealed and
reported in the occurrence of severe growth regulator injury in glasshouse
tomatoes. The injury is characterized by failure of leaf expansion, in
rolling of leaf venation and margin morphology, along with fruit
deformation. The injury could be traced to the domestic water supply,
which had been contaminated by effluent from a factory manufacturing 2,
3, 6-TBA.
Fish and other aquatic biota may be harmed by pesticide-contaminated
water [48]. Pesticide surface runoff into rivers and streams can be highly
lethal to aquatic life, sometimes killing all the fish in a particular stream
[49]. Application of herbicides to bodies of water can cause fish
kills when the dead plants rot and use up the water's oxygen, suffocating
the fish [48]. Some herbicides, such as copper sulfite, that are applied to
water to kill plants are toxic to fish and other water animals at
concentrations similar to those used to kill the plants[48]. Repeated
exposure to sublethal doses of some pesticides can cause physiological
and behavioral changes in fish that reduce populations, such as
abandonment of nests and broods, decreased immunity to disease, and
increased failure to avoid predators [48]. Application of herbicides to
34
bodies of water can kill off plants on which fish depend for their habitat
[48]. Pesticides can accumulate in bodies of water to levels that kill
off zooplankton, the main source of food for young fish [50]. Pesticides can
kill off the insects on which some fish feed, causing the fish to travel farther
in search of food and exposing them to greater risk from predators [48].
2.6. Carbofuran
2.6.1. Structure of Carbofuran
Carbofuran (2, 3–Dihydro–2, 2–Dimethyl–7 Benzofuranyl methyl carbamates)
Is an important soil insecticide grouped under carbamates with the
molecular formula C12 H15 O3N (Structure 3.6). The structural
formula of carbofuran is given below;
Chemical Structure 2.6. Carbofuran
Persistence and bio-availability of carbofuran in soil is decided by
processes like adsorption - desorption, movement and leaching,
degradation and metabolism. A brief review of the research work done
on the above aspect of carbofuran and its interaction with soil components
is given below.
35
2.6.2. Adsorption - desorption.
For better understanding and good environmental management, the
sorption behavior of pesticides in soils is highly useful. The adsorption
and adsorption of carbofuran in two types of Malaysian Soils [clay (high
organic carbon content) and sandy clay (low organic carbon content)] was
investigated by Farahani et. al. [51]. The recovery rate of carbofuran from
sandy clay with low organic carbon content was higher. This means that
percentage adsorption of carbofuran is higher in clay than in sandy clay
soils. They also found that at low adsorption of carbofuran decreased with
increase in temperature initial concentration (10 μg). However, at higher
initial concentrations (eg. 50 μg), the influence of temperature on
adsorption is not significant.
The adsorption of carbofuran in wet zone soils of Sri Lanka was analysed
by Janitha et. al [52]. As the use of carbofuran in the wet zone of Sri
Lanka is very high, the authors [52] have analysed the pesticide soil
sorption coefficient (Kd, (L/kg) for all types of soils in Sri Lanka by using
HPLC. Kd for carbofuran was highest in Wagura soil which has the
highest soil organic carbon (SOC) content of 8.5 L/kg soil and the Kd was
lowest for the Pugoda soil series which has the lowest SOC content of 0.2
L/kg soil. The variation in Kd values indicates the different sorption
capacities of the soils for carbofuran and the vast range of Kd indicates
the differences in the SOC content in different wet zone soil series in Sri
Lanka.
Janitha et. al [53] also studied the sorption behavior of two commonly
used pesticides (carbofuran and diuron) in 43 surface soils samples from
dry and wet zones of Sri Lanka. For carbofuran, the Kd (L/kg) values
36
varied from 0.11 to 4.1 (mean, 0.83; median, 0.62) and Koc ranged from
7.3 to 120.6 (mean, 41.65; median, 36.1), whereas for diuron Kd values
varied from 0.5 to 75 (mean, 9.6; median, 5.15) and Koc ranged from 55.3
to 962 (mean, 407; median, 328). A comparison of sorption data [53] on
these tropical soils with published studies (mostly European and north
American soils) showed that the ranges of sorption coefficients from Sri
Lankan soils were within the wide range of Koc values reported in the
literature. However, these values for both pesticides in soils from dry
zones of Sri Lanka were consistently higher (up to two times) than those
from the wet zone. The wide range of Kocvalues in Sri Lankan soils may
be due to the possible difference in the nature of soil organic carbon,
which needs to be further investigated.
Various factors such as the effects of exchangeable cations (H+ and Na
+),
autoclaving, organic matter, cationic and anionic surfactants, and
temperature on the adsorption of carbofuran on to two different types of
soils are studied by R. P. Singh et. al [54]. They found that the amount of
carbofuran adsorbed in all cases was higher in Jhansi red loam soil than in
Pilibhit sandy loam soil and was related to organic matter content, clay
content, CaCO3 content, surface area, and cation-exchange capacity of the
soils. Carbofuran adsorption was better correlated with clay content than
with organic matter content of soils.
The evaluation of pesticide-soil system interactions as a function of soil
properties was analysed by Ali and Wilkins [55]. The controlled release
granules made from lignin and poly (vinyl chloride) have reduced losses
in delivery of soil pesticides, such as carbofuran, leading to lower
application rates in the field and less leaching hazard. According to the
37
studies of Johnson et.al., [56] carbofuran is expected to partition into the
water from soil.
Hamaker et. al., [57] reported that there is stronger adsorption of picloram
and 2, 4, 5, - T by Iron (Fe) and Aluminium (Al) oxides by clay minerals.
They further stated that although crystallised and amorphous Fe and Al
hydroxides are generally poor adsorbents, they are important in the
sorption of weak acidic compounds. Adsorption mechanism of carbamate
was reported to be through low energy (<80 KJ mol-1
) bonding and was
considered to be due to hydrogen bonds (Bailey et al. [58]. Helling et al [59]
reported that organic matter, pH, clay content, cation exchange capacity
and field moisture capacity are the major factors that influence the
behavior of the pesticides in soil. Felsot and Wilson [60] have correlated
the adsorption of carbofuran positively with organic matter content.
(R2=0.96) and CEC (R
2=0.83). Garg [61] studied the adsorption,
desorption and degradation of carbofuran and bendiocarb in soil and
found that organic matter and clay content are the important factors that
control the availability of carbofuran through adsorption-desorption
mechanisms and degradation.
Rajukkannu and Sree Ramulu [62] conducted a detailed study on the
adsorption of carbofuran in red, alluvial, black and laterite soils. They
found that the adsorption isotherm of carbofuran follows a Freundlich’s
adsorption equation X/M=KC1/n
where X/M = Quantity of carbofuran
adsorbed per unit weight of soil or clay, C=equilibrium concentration,
K= constant and n=constant which indicate energy of adsorption. The K
value for red, black, alluvial, and laterite soils were 9.09,15.14,0.56 and
70.79 respectively. The variation in clay content, organic matter and pH
38
were attributed for this observation. In correlation studies, organic matter
was highly correlated with Kd (ratio of the quantity of a compound
adsorbed per unit weight of the adsorbant to the equilibrium
concentration) values (0.98) while pH and EC were found to be
negatively correlated.
Cation exchange capacity and sesquioxides had a known significant
relationship with Kd values. The Kd values were highest in laterite soil
followed sequentially by black, alluvial and red soils.
Garg and Agnihotri [63] evaluated the adsorption of carbofuran and
bendiocarb on alluvial soil, red soil, black soil and forest soils and in
reference clays like bentonite vermiculite and kaolinite at pH 5, 7 and 9.
They found that the amount of pesticide adsorbed was related to the clay
content and organic carbon and decreased in the order bentonite>
vermiculite > kaolinite clays. The adsorption increased with increasing
pH values of soil. The infrared spectra showed shifting of bonds on
adsorption of insecticides in 2920, 1745,1225 cm-1
indicating that – CH2,
C=0 & - C - O – C groups were involved in adsorption. Only about 18-
43% of the adsorbed carbofuran could be desorbed.
Somasundaran et. al., [64] studied the effect of manuring on the
persistence and degradation of carbofuran and found that in continuously
manured soil, persistence of carbofuran was drastically increased.
According to them organic matter is a major adsorbent in the soil and the
persistence of the carbofuran was positively correlated with its content.
Adhikari and Ray [65] observed that adsorption isotherm of carbaryl on a
model soil was ‘S’ shaped and followed the Freundlich’s equation.
39
X/M= KC1/n
Equation 2.1.
The adsorption was mainly dependent on the availability of adsorbent
surface and was found to be physical in nature.
Crepeion et. al. [66] had shown that the addition of coal to soil at 4:1
soil: coal ratio retained 94.7% of applied carbofuran as compared to soil
alone which had 48.5% retention.
Moisture content of the coal was positively correlated with retention.
Achik et. al. [67] studied adsorption-desorption and movement of
carbofuran in two types of soil viz. clay and clay loams and observed that
adsorption in both the soils followed Freundich’s equation. The adsorption
constant ‘K’ for clay soil, which had higher organic matter content, was
grater than that for loamy clay soil.
Achik et. al. [68] found that carbofuran molecule tended to desorb and
remain in solution .The estimated values for desorption coefficient of
carbofuran were always significantly higher than the estimated values for
adsorption coefficient, irrespective of the soil. This indicated that
carbofuran was not strongly adsorbed and showed desorption tendency
regardless of the type of the soil.
2.6.3. Movement and leaching
Many workers studied the movement and leaching of a wide variety of
pesticides. The adsorption and movement of carbofuran (a systemic
nematicide) in soil columns was analysed by Kumari et. al. [69] taking
two Indian soils (clay loam and silt loam) of alluvial origin. Equilibrium
adsorption coefficient (K) values measured using a batch-slurry technique
40
follows the order clay loam >silt loam soil. A larger amount of water was
needed for leaching the carbofuran to 152 cm in clay loam soil than in silt
loam soil. Carbofuran appeared to increase in drier soils and in finer
textured soils. The influence of soil structure, percolation speed and
product dose on the movement of carbofuran in soils was analysed by
Achik et. al. [70]. Under natural conditions, drained water of a clay soil
rich in organic matter was shown to be systematically more highly
contaminated than that of a loamy clay soil. Although these factors
modify insecticide transfer, it was, however, observed theoretically that
the soil having the stronger adsorption capacity did not retain the product
well.
The downward movement of carbofuran in two Malaysian soil types was
studied using soil columns by Farahani et. al. [71] The columns were
filled with disturbed and undisturbed soils of either the Bagan Datoh soil
(clay) or the Labu soil (sandy clay). The average total percentage of
carbofuran in the leachate of the undisturbed Labu soil after 14 days of
watering (80.8%) was approximately similar to that of the total amount
from the disturbed soil (81.4%). However, carbofuran leaching was
observed in the disturbed soil after the fourth day of watering whereas for
the undisturbed soil, leaching occurred after the first watering. The study
showed that less leaching occurred in soil columns with high organic
content.
R.P. Singh et. al. [72], determined the adsorption and movement of
carbofuran on four divergent textured Indian soils at a fixed volume
fraction (fs = 0.1) of methanol/water mixtures using batch equilibrium and
soil thin layer chromatography (soil TLC) techniques. The measured
41
equilibrium adsorption isotherms for silt loam (FSL and ASL) and loam
(KL) soils were L-shaped and for sandy loam (BSL) soil S-shaped, all
being well fitted by the Freundlich isotherm. A higher adsorption of
carbofuran was observed on FSL followed by ASL, KL and BSL soils as
anticipated by the values obtained for the Freundlich constant, KF and
partition coefficient, KD. The affinity of carbofuran towards organic
carbon, organic matter and clay content of the soils was evaluated by
calculating the KOC, KOM and KC values. The negative magnitude of the
Gibbs' free energy (ΔG0) indicated the spontaneity of the adsorption of
carbofuran onto the soils studied. The leaching index (LI) of carbofuran
calculated for the soils studied indicated its high potential to leach into
shallow aquifers and ground water.
Bowling [73] studied the lateral movement of carbofuran and reported
that carbofuran applied to flooded rice moved laterally at the rate of 22.5
cm in 48 hours in quantities toxic to leaf hopper. Felsot and Wilson [60]
found that cabofuran was very mobile in agricultural Soils. They studied
and reported a direct relationship between adsorption of the insecticides
and its mobility in soil. According to Moreali and Bladen [74] elution
curves obtained by a method using undisturbed soil columns (1 m deep)
showed the leaching characteristics of carbofuran are likely to
contaminate the soil leading to real contamination hazards.
Dibakar Sahu and Agnihotri [75] found that when 0.6 kg ai/ ha of
cabofuran was applied, no detectable residue was observed in sub soil
samples at 15 – 30 cm. They suggested that carbofuran residue are rather
tightly adsorbed on the soil particles and are not available for leaching
through percolating water.
42
Moreale and Bladen [76] observed that due to increasing utilization of
carbofuran, relatively high water solubility, persistence in soils of low pH
(less than 5.5) and low adsorption by soil colloids, the migration of this
chemical to relatively deep water table can occur. Residual amounts were
fairly high and the possibility of water table contamination depends
primarily on the volume of water present (dilution effect). Rajukannu and
Sree Ramulu [77] conducted leachate studies of carbofuran in 5 types of
soil using soil columns and classified carbofuran as mobile (Class 1V) in
red, black and alluvial soils while in laterite soil it was ranked
“moderately mobile” (class 111). The leaching of carbofuran was very
rapid in red, black and alluvial soils and the leachate contained 55, 66.5
and 41.5% of the added carbofuran In laterite soils, a major portion of the
added carbofuran was retained in the 1st
column section (0 -10 cm) and
movement was not detected beyond the 3rd
column section (20—30 cm).
Copin et. al. [78] in a field trial studied the leaching loss of carbofuran in
cornfield analysis and observed that no residue was detected at > 10 cm
depth. Residue of carbofuran in the top layer was smaller and decreased to
undetectable limit within 3 months.
Lee et. al. [79] studied the fate of cabofuran in soil and found that
carbofuran is highly mobile in soils. It moved to a depth of 70 cm under
natural precipitation and evaporation condition in 135 days after the
application. The concentration throughout the profile was > 0.02 mg kg -1
soil. Somasundaramm and Coats [80] studied the mobility of the pesticide
using soil thin layer chromatography technique. They found that mobility
of carbofuran was less in clay loams and silty clay loams compared to
sandy loam and loamy sand. From the soil properties, they concluded that
43
the low mobility in clay loams and silty loams was due to its low pH, high
organic matter and high clay content compared to sandy loams.
Achik et. al. [67] conducted an experiment on the movement of carbofuran in
soil and influence of soil type and aggregate size on the movement of
carbofuran. The results showed that carbofuran leaching in clay soil was
grater than loamy clay and the product moved through the soil more
rapidly and the total quantity exported by percolating water was higher
in clay soil than in loamy clay soil .The fine aggregate fraction retarded
the movement of carbofuran and elimination of the fine aggregate fraction
increased the movement of the product in the soil.
Kladivko et. al., [81] conducted an experiment with subsurface tile drains
installed on low organic matter and poorly structured silt loams soil under
typical agricultural management practices. They found that 0.8 to 14.1
g/ha or 0.05 to 0.94% of the soil-applied carbofuran was lost annually in
the sub-surface drain flow from the soil.
Daniel et. al., [82] conducted an experiment on the dissolution rate of
granular carbofuran and found that carbofuran concentration decreased
rapidly as a function of the distance, such that even after 72 hours there
was only 1 mg ml-1.
of carbofuran at a distance of 2cm from the surface of
the granule applied. This data is indicative of the low molecular diffusion
rate of carbofuran in soil and hence could not be considered as a major
factor in defining pesticide mobility.
2.6.4. Degradation and metabolism
Carbofuran is highly soluble in water (700 mg/l, 25°C) and therefore it
has high potential for water contamination [83]. Its half life in soil is 30 to
44
120 days and in vegetation it is 4 days when applied to roots and longer
than 4 days if applied to the leaves. It undergoes hydrolysis in alkaline
soils [84] and also breakdown in soil and groundwater. Otieno et. al., [85]
have noted the soil and water contamination with carbofuran residues in
agricultural farmlands in Kenya. The two of its toxic metabolites
3-hydroxycarbofuran and 3-ketocarbofuran, were noted in soil and water.
The studies indicated the risk in using the water samples as drinking water
for animals. Carbofuran degrades in water to carbofuran phenol by base
catalysed hydrolysis [86]. The rate of aqueous hydrolysis of carbofuran
increases dramatically with increasing pH.
According to the study of Bailey et al., [87] at a pH of 3, 80-95% of
carbofuran was recovered, how ever when the pH was 10 only 65% of the
original amount was recovered after 1 hour, 35% remained after 3 hours,
and 10% remained after 6 hours.
The biodegradation of carbofuran in the soil was investigated by
Plangklang et. al. [88] using Burkholderia cepacia PCL3 (GenBank
accession number of EF990634), a carbofuran degrader isolated from
phytoremediated rhizosphere soil. Short half-lives (t1/2) of carbofuran of
3–4 d in BSM were obtained using the isolate PCL3 in both free and
immobilized cell forms. PCL3 could be reused twice without loss in their
abilities to degrade carbofuran in BSM, which suggested an advantage of
using immobilized cell over free cell. Repeated application of carbofuran
to soils can result in enhanced rates of microbial degradation was
analysed by Harris et al. [89] and Turco et. al. [90]. According to Parkin
et. al. [91] enhanced degradation of a soil-applied pesticide may occur
when a population of soil microorganisms is repeatedly exposed to a
45
chemical and adapts by developing the ability to catabolize the chemical.
The accelerated degrdation of carbofuran in pretreated soils was analysed
by D. L. Suett [92] and Raha [93]. The rapid breakdown was related to
changes in the populations of soil micro-organisms rather than to
differences in soil properties.
The Investigation of pyrolysis behavior of carbofuran by pyrolysis-gas
chromatography–mass spectrometry was carried out by Wang et. al., [94].
It was found that carbofuran was decomposed with the temperature
increase. A large number of mono aromatics and polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs) were formed when the temperature was higher than
750◦C, and the concentration of aromatic hydrocarbons were higher at
higher temperature.
Kandaswamy et. al., [95] studied a Helminthosporium sp, which would
degrade grater than 70% of a 20-ppm amount of carbofuran within 14
days. Strains of Aspergillums Niger and Trichoderma viridae were less
active in degradation. All the three isolate formed hydroxyl carbofuran as
an intermediate.
Greenhalgh and Relangur [96] observed that when carbofuran was applied
to a humic mesisol, 3 OH carbofuran and 3-keto carbofuran were detected
as transformation products. 3-hydroxy carbofuran reached maximum
concentration in 1-7 days and 3-keto carbofuran attained maximum value
in 16-36 days.
Garg and Agnihotri [63] studied the degradation rate of carbofuran in five
soils and observed that half-life period of carbofuran showed wide
46
variation between different soils. In case of laterite soil, half-life period
was 69 days compared to 8 days in black soils.
Brahmaprakash and Sethunathan [97] reported that degradation of
carbofuran occurred in soils mainly by hydrolysis and 3 OH carbofuran
was found to be the chief metabolite in soil.
Arunachalam and Lekshmanan [98] studied the decomposition of labeled
carbofuran under four different conditions viz. Sterile flooded (SF), sterile
non flooded (SNF), non sterile flooded (NSF) and no sterile non flooded
(NSNF) and observed that in SF and SNF soil, more than 75% of the
added carbofuran was recovered as a residue after 60 days. In NSF and
NSNF soil, more than 75% of the added carbofuran was metabolized
during the same period with 3 keto- carbofuran and carbofuran 7 phenols
as major metabolized during incubation. Jae-Koo Lee et. al., [99] found
that after the application of carbofuran in soil, 3 keto carbofuran phenol
was the major metabolite and carbofuran phenol, 3 hydroxy carbofuran
and 3 hydroxy carbofuran phenol were found as minor metabolites.
2.6.5. Persistence
Owing to its low tendency to volatilize from water or moist soils, very
low concentrations are noted in air. The investigators [100] noted only
0.03 to 0.66 ug/m3 after a 44-hour sampling period following its an
application of 44% active ingredient carbofuran. In a sandy loam soil
Harris [101], employing bioassay techniques, found that the carbofuran
was detectable up to 16 weeks after the application. He also noticed the
persistence of this carbamate insecticide for a longer period in muck soil
compared to sandy loam soil. Gupta and Devan [102] observed much
47
shorter persistence for carbofuran in soils under Indian condition. The
residue persisted only for 35 days when 0.4 to 1.33 kg ai/ha was applied
to soil. Das et. al., [103] found a high persistence for carbofuran in laterite
and black soils of Kerala as shown by the mortality of Aphis craccivora
released from cowpea (Vigina unguiculata) grown in the treated soil.
Green Halgh and Relangur [96] observed the half life of carbofuran to be
15 – 30 days when applied to a humic mesisol at the rate of 2.24 and 4.48
kg ai/ha.
Gordan et. al., (1982) [104] in field and lab studies on the persistence of
soil applied carbofuran identified soil moisture as the most important
factor in carbofuran persistence. He observed no carbofuran residue at the
depth of more than 7.5 cm, 22 weeks after application.
Copin et. al., [78] found that residue of carbofuran applied on the surface
in the top soil layer to be very small and became undetectable with in
three months.
Getzin and Shanks [105] measured the persistence of C14
carbonyl
carbofuran in pacific North West soil. The half life was > 2 weeks in all
cases and > 15 weeks in five different soils. The carbofuran decay curve
always possessed an initial lag phase where soil mixing enhanced
insecticide decline.
The Persistence of carbofuran in marine sand and water was investigated
by Campbell et. al., [106]. Marine sand and seawater samples were
collected from Laysan Island in the Hawaiian Islands National Wildlife
Refuge, where a small area was contaminated by the carbamate
insecticide carbofuran. Carbofuran was detected at microg g (-1)
levels in
48
the Laysan sand. The photolysis of carbofuran was faster in seawater than
in distilled deionized water when it was exposed to 300 nm light (t1/2, 0.1
vs. 3.1 h) and to direct sunlight (t1/2, 7.5 vs. 41.6 h).
The persistence of carbofuran applied to surface (oxidised) and sub-
surface (reduced) layers of a flooded soil was studied using radiolabelled
insecticides by Soudamini Panda et. al., [107]. In one experiment, these
compounds were placed in the surface (2–5 mm) and sub-surface (10–15 cm)
layers of 10-day flooded soil columns. The decreased stability of surface-
applied carbofuran was attributed to be due to a relatively higher pH in
the surface layer and in the floodwater, which was in immediate contact
with the surface layer.
The persistence of carbofuran in two Malaysian soils namely the Bagan
Datoh and Labu soils was studied under laboratory conditions at a
constant temperature of 30 C by Farahani et. al., [108]. It was observed
that the half-lives of carbofuran in the Labu soil samples (which are low
in organic matter content) at 100%, 90% and 60% field capacity were
57.28, 38.51 and 115.52 days respectively. However the corresponding
half-lives of carbofuran in the Bagan Datoh samples (which are high in
organic matter content) at 100%, 90% and 60% field capacity were
192.54, 141.46 and 203.87 days respectively. The degradation of
carbofuran followed a first order kinetic reaction. The results of this study
showed that soil moisture content, micro-organisms and the organic
matter content (OM) affected the degradation of carbofuran in both soils.
Achik et. al., [109] studied the carbofuran (Curater 5G) behavior in two
drained cornfield soils, clay and loamy clay, for 2 successive years.
Different dissipations were observed in each soil for the same time period
49
(8 weeks in 1985, 9 weeks in 1986). The authors found drained water
from organic matter-rich soil to possess a higher carbofuran content, with
7.1–13.7 and 2.5–5.0% of the applied dose for clay and loamy-clay soils,
respectively. The major part of these percentages arose from the drained
waters associated with rainfall occurring during the first 2–3 weeks after
application. Laboratory experiments confirmed the influence of the soil
structure and its properties on carbofuran adsorption, and consequently on
carbofuran leaching under field conditions.
To conclude, the literature survey conducted above revealed that the
following were the factors that control the adsorption, desorption,
movement, leaching, degradation and metabolism of the pesticide residue
in the soil; factors such as organic matter, clay content, CEC, field
moisture capacity (water holding capacity (WHC)) influenced the
behaviour of the pesticide in the soil. The mobility of carbofuran in the
agricultural soil was found to be greater. The availability of carbofuran in
the soil, adsorption and desorption mechanisms and degradation
behaviour are mainly decided by the organic matter and clay content of
the soil. Correlation studies conducted by various scientists revealed a
direct relation between organic matter and adsorption of the pesticides,
while and inverse relation was obtained with respect to pH and electrical
conductivity. In the case of laterite soil, black, alluvial, and red soils, it
was found that adsorption increased with decreasing pH. The continuous
manuring technique, employed in agriculture, was found to be drastically
increasing the presence of carbofuran in the soil due to two main reasons.
First of all, the organic matter in the soil being a major adsorbent of
carbofuran enhances the persistance of carbofuran. Secondly, the higher
50
manure content checks the microbial activity that degrades carbofuran,
which also increases the tendency of carbofuran to persist in the soil. This
caused the prolonged persistence of carbofuran in the soil subjected to
continuous manuring technique. The retention of carbofuran in the soil
was found to be very much dependent on the moisture content of the soil.
With increasing depth of the soil, the amount of carbofuran reduced, as
expected. The degradation rate of carbofuran was directly related to the
high pH of the soil and inversely related to the organic matter content.
51
References
1. K Bhuvaneswari, A Regupathy, G.S.V Raghavan, (1998) Published
by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers,
St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.org.
2. Agnihotri. V, and Mithyantha. M.S, (1978). Pesticide Residues –A
review of India work. Rallis India Ltd. Mumbai.
3. Anoop. K. Singh, A. Kulshretha, Pant. S. Gupta., A. Mukharjee, I.
Gajahiye., V. T. Dikshit, A. K. and Kulshrestha. G., (2004). Multi
residue GLC method for organochlorine and organophosphrous
pesticide in water Proc. National Symposium on Pesticides. Myths,
Realities and Remadise. New Delhi.
4. Bindra O. S., and Kalara. R. L., (1978). A review of the work done
in India on pesticide residues. In: Progress and Problems in
Pesticide Residue Analysis. PAU- ICR I-44.
5. Biswas. P. K. Mitra. S. R., Dutta S. Mukharjee P. and Bahattacharya.
A., (2004). Photolysis of Napropamide in Aqueous Methanol,
National Symposium on pesticides: Myths, Realities and Remedies.
New Delhi, December1-3, 2004.
6. Chau Alfred. S. Y., Afgan. B. K. (1981) PP.51C.R.C Press, Inc.
Florida.
7. Edwards. C. A. (1976) Persistent Pesticide in the Environment.
C.R.C. Press. HIO, USA.
52
8. Edwards. C. A., Veeresh, G. K. and Kruger. H. R., (1978). Pesticide
Residue in Environment in India Proc. Symp. at. U.S.A. Hebbal,
Bangalore, India.
9. Jeevan Rao, K., (1999) Associate Professor and Head, Dept. of soil
science & Agriculture Chemistry, Ag. Mahanadi, Nandyal R.S.,
A.P. pp.19 In: Environment & People.
10. Kalral, R. L. and CHAWLA, R. P., (1983), Studies on Pesticide
Residues and Monitoring of Pesticide pollution. Department of
Entomology, PAU, Ludhiana.
11. Environmental Health Criteria 9: (1979) DDT and its derivatives,
World Health Organization.
12. Geisz HN, Dickhut RM, Cochran MA, Fraser WR, Ducklow HW
(2005). "Melting Glaciers: A Probable Source of DDT to the
Antarctic Marine Ecosystem". Environ. Sci. Technol. ASAP: 3958.
doi : 10.1021/es702919n. Retrieved 2008-05-07.
13. Toxicological Profile: for DDT, DDE, and DDE. Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry, September 2002.
14. Van den Berg, Henk; (2001) Secretariat of the Stockholm Convention.
15. Rogan WJ, Chen A (2005). "Health risks and benefits of bis(4-
chlorophenyl)-1,1,1-trichloroethane (DDT)".Lancet 366 (9487): 763-
73. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67182-6. PMID 16125595.
16. Eskenazi, Brenda (2009). "The Pine River Statement: Human Health
Consequences of DDT Use". Environ. Health Perspect.
53
17. Spinelli, John J., Ng, C.H., Weber, J.P., Connors, J.M., Gascoyne,
RD., Lai, AS., Brooks-Wilson, A.R., Le, ND et al. (2007).
"Organochlorines and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma". Int. J.
Cancer 121 (12): 2767–75. doi:10.1002/ijc.23005.PMID 17722095.
18. McGlynn, Katherine A., Quraishi, Sabah M., Graubard, B. I.,
Weber, J. P., Rubertone, M. V., Erickson, RL (2008). "Persistent
Organochlorine Pesticides and Risk of Testicular Germ Cell
Tumors".
19. Swarup Narain Tiwari and Shital P. Harplani, (1972) Toxicology,
Chemical Examiner’s Lab, Detection of organophophorous pesticide
residue in autopsy tissue by TLC.
20. US EPA (2008). "Carbofuran Cancellation Process". US EPA.
Retrieved 2008-08-11.
21. Chemical & Engineering News, (2009), "Manufacturer drops
Carbofuran uses", p. 18.
22. "EPA Bans Carbofuran Pesticide Residues on Food". (2009)
Environmental News Service.
23. BBC news - Insecticide 'killing Kenya lions'
24. CBS 60 Minutes - Poison Takes Toll on Africa's Lions
25. http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/2358933
26. Bhanoo, Sindya (2010). "Household Pesticide Is Finding Its Way
Into California Rivers, Study Suggests". Green Inc. Energy,
Environment, and the Bottom Line. New York Times.
54
27. Zaveri, Mihir (2010). "Study Links Pesticides to River Contamination".
The Daily Californian.
28. "Permethrin, Resmethrin, Sumithrin: Synthetic Pyrethroids for
Mosquito Control". (2002) United States Environmental Protection
Agency.
29. Jack F. Mills (2002), Bromine, An Ullamann’s Encyclopedia of
Chemical Technology.
30. Gupta P. K., (2004), Pesticide Exposure-Indian Scene, Toxicology,
198: 83-90.
31. Kapadia and Mohla et. al., (1980), Pesticide Marketing in India.
32. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1991) Environmental Fact
Sheet for Carbofuran. Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances,
US EPA, Washington, DC.
33. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1989) Health Advisory
Summary for Carbofuran. US EPA, Washington, DC.
34. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1990) Carbofuran:
Requests to amend registrations to delete certain uses and final
determination with respect to those uses. Federal Register 55 (202):
42266-8.
35. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. (1990)
SCS/ARS/CES Pesticide Properties Database: Version 2.0 (Summary).
USDA - Soil Conservation Service, Syracuse, NY.
36. Gupta R.C, J. Toxicol. Environ Health. (1994) 43(4):383-418.
55
37. Department of Transportation. (1984). Emergency Response
Guidebook: Guidebook for hazardous materials incidents.
Washington, DC: U.S. DOT.
38. Meister, R.T. (ed.) (1987). Farm Chemicals Handbook. Willoughby,
OH: Meister Publishing Co.
39. Occupational Health Services, Inc. (1991). MSDS for carbofuran.
OHS Inc., Secaucus, NJ.
40. Dragica V. Brki´c, Slavoljub L. J. Vitorovi´c, Slavica M. Gaˇsi´c,
Neˇsko K. Neˇskovi (2008) Environmental Toxicology and
Pharmacology 25, 334–341.
41. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1989) Health Advisory
Summary for Carbofuran. US EPA, Washington, DC
42. Tucker, Richard. (1970) Handbook of toxicity of pesticides to
wildlife. USDI Fish & Wildlife Service
43. Hartley, D. and H. Kidd, (eds.) (1983) The agrochemicals
handbook. Nottingham, England: Royal Society of Chemistry.
44. Radka DOBŠÍKOVÁ, (2003) Plant Protect. Sci. Vol. 39, No. 3:
103–108.
45. Graeme Murphy (2005), Resistance Management- Pesticide Rotation.
Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs.
46. Anson, Blake D., Ma, Junyi, He, Jia-Qiang (2009). "Identifying
Cardiotoxic Compounds". Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News
(Mary Ann Liebert) 29 (9): pp. 34–35. ISSN 1935-472X. OCLC
77706455.
56
47. J.E. Fox et al. (2007) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, USA, Dol 10:1073/
pans.0611710/04.
48. Helfrich, LA, Weigmann, DL, Hipkins, P, and Stinson, ER (1996),
Pesticides and aquatic animals: A guide to reducing impacts on
aquatic systems. Virginia Cooperative Extension.
49. Toughill K (1999), The summer the rivers died: Toxic runoff from
potato farms is poisoning P.E.I. Originally published in Toronto Star
Atlantic Canada Bureau.
50. Pesticide Action Network North America (1999), Pesticides threaten
birds and fish in California. PANUPS.
51. G.H.N. Farahani, Zuriati Zakaria, Aini Kuntom, (2007) Dzolkifli
Omar and 1B.S. Ismail Advances in Environmental Biology, 1(1):
20-26.
52. Janitha A. Liyanage, Ransilu C. Watawala, Ananda P.
Mallawatantri, and Rai Kookana. (2006) This presentation is part
of 145: 2.5B Interactions between Clays and Organic Matter and
Their Impact on Sorption and Availability of Organic Compounds in
Soil Environments.
53. Janitha A. Liyanage, Ransilu C. Watawala, A.G.Piyal Aravinna, Lester
Smith, and Rai S. (2006) Kookana CSIRO Land and Water, PMB 2,
Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia. J. Agric. Food Chem., 54 (5), pp
1784–1791.
54. R. P. Singh, K. Kumari, Dhirendra Singh, (1994) Ecotoxicology and
Environmental Safety, Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 70-79.
57
55. M.A. Ali and R.M. Wilkins, (1992) Science of The Total
Environment, Volumes 123-124, Pages 469-480.
56. Johnson, W.G., and T.L. Lavy. (1995). Organic Chemicals in the
Environment. J Environ Qual, 24:487-193.
57. Hamaker, J. W., Goring, C.A.I. and Young SON, C. R., (1966).
Sorption and leaching of 4- amino -3-4-6-trichloro- picolinic acid in
the soils. In Gould, F. (ed) Organic pesticide in the Environment,
23-27. Advances in Chemistry. Series 60. American Chemistry
Society.
58. Bailey, G. W., and White, J. L., and Rotbbert, T., (1968). Adsorption
of organic herbicides by montmorillonite, role of pH and chemical
character of adsorbate. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc., Am., 32: 222-234.
59. Helling, C.S., (1971) Pesticides mobility in soils. 111. Influence of
properties. Soil Soc. Am. Proc., 35: 734 –24.
60. Felsot, A. and Wilson, J, (1980). Adsorption of carbofuran and
movement on soil thin layers. Bull. Environ. Contam. Txicol.,
25 (5): 778-782.
61. Garg, P. K. (1982). Adsorption, desorption and degradation of
carbofuran and bedicarb in soil. PhD Thesis. IARI.
62. Rajukkannnu and Sree Ramulu: U.S. (1982b) – Influence of Soil
Properties on the Adsorption of Carbofuran in Soil, Madras Agric.
J., 69 (9): 580-584.
58
63. Garg, P. K. and Agnihotri, N.P. (1984). Adsorption, desorption of
carbofuran and bedicarb on soil and clay minerals. Clay Research.,
3(1): 17-22.
64. Somasundaran et al (1987) The effect of manuring on the
persistence and degradation of soil by L Somasundaran et al,. Earth
and environ mental science.
65. Adhikari, M., and Ray, A., (1990). Studies on adsorption of carbaryl
and atrazine on model soils and an agronomic soil. Clay Research. ,
6(2): 101-106.
66. Crepeion, K. L., Walker, G., and Winterium, W., (1990). Use of
coal retreat pesticide movement in soils. J. Environ. Sci. Health.
26 (5-6): 529 –545.
67. Achik, J., Schiavon, M., & Janet, P., (1991a) study of carbofuran
movement in soils. Part 1- soil structure. Environmental international,
17: 73-79.
68. Achik, J., Schiavon, M., and Jamet, P., (1991b). Study of carbofuran
movement in soils. Part 2 soil structure. Environmental international,
17:81-88.
69. Kumari, K., Singh, R. P., and Saxena, S. K., (1998) Ecotoxicology
and Environmental Safety, 16(1), p. 36-44.
70. Achik J., and Schiavon, M., (2004) ENSAIA-INPL Laboratoire de
Protection des Cultures, 2, avenue de la Forêt de Haye, 54500,
Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
59
71. Farahani, G. H. N., Zakaria, Z., (2008) Springer Science+Business
Media, LLC.
72. Singh, R. P., Garima Srivastava, (2009) Adsorption Science and
Technology, 27(2), 193-203.
73. Bowling, C.C., (1970). Lateral movement, up take and retention- of
carbofuran applied to flooded rice plants. J, Econ., Ent., 63:239-242.
74. Moreale, A., and Bladen, R. Van. (1982). (Mobility and dispersion
of some pesticide in undisturbed soil columns) Mededelingen Van
de Faculteit Landbouwwetenschappen. , 47 (i): 381- 394.
75. Dibakar Sahu and Agnihotri, N.P. (1983). Persistence and
metabolism of carbofuran in soil and maize crop Indian J. Ent.,
45(i): 38-44.
76. Moreale, A., and Bladen, R. Van. (1983). (Movement of insecticide
Carbofuran towards the water table). Mededelingen Van de
Landbouwwetenschappen., 48) 4): 895- 995.
77. Rajukkannnu K., and Sree Ramulu U.S. (1982a), Leaching and
Movement of Carbofuran in the Soil, Madras Agri. J, 69(8): 501-
506.
78. Copin, A., Deleum, R., Salembier, J.F., and Belien, J.M., (1985).
Study of movement of three pesticides of different solubility in
soil under natural condition., INRA. Belgium. 47-56.
79. Lee, D.Y., Chen, C.T., and Houng, K.H., (1990) Behaviour
assessment of eight major pesticides used in Tiawan in soil by
60
mechanistic model. Soil & Fertilizers in Taiwan., 33- 50. Graduate
institute of Agricchem. National Tiawan University.
80. Somasundaram, L., Joel, R., Coats,
Kenneth D., Rack, Mobility of
Pesticides and their hydrolysis Metabolites in Soil, Environ.
Toxicol. Chemistry, 10:185-194.
81. Kladivko, E.J., Scoyoc, G.E. Ven., Monke, and Oates, K.M., (1991).
Pesticides and nutrient movement into subsurftance tile drains on
asilt loam soil in India. J. Environ. Quality. 20(1): 264-270.
82. Daniel, R., Shelton. Ali, M., Sodeghi. and Allen, R. Isensea. (1992).
Estimation of granular carbofuran dissolution rates in soil. J. Agric
Food Chem.41 (7): 412- 416.
83. Howard, P.H., (ed.). (1989). Handbook of Environmental Fate and
Exposure Data for Organic Chemicals, Vol. III: Pesticides. Lewis
Publishers, Chelsea, MI.
84. Department of Transportation. (1984). Emergency Response
Guidebook: Guidebook for hazardous materials incidents. Washington,
DC: U.S. DOT.
85. Peter O. Otieno, Joseph O. Lalah; Munir Virani; Isaac O. Jondiko;
(2010) Karl-Werner Schramm Journal of Environmental Science and
Health, Part B, Volume 45,pages 137–144.
86. Talebi, K., C.H. Walker. (1993). A Comparative Study of
Carbofuran Metabolism in Treated and Untreated Soils. Pesticide
Science, 39:65-69.
61
87. Bailey, H. C., DiGiorgio, C., Kroll, K., Miller, J., Hinton, D.E., and
Starrett, G., (1996). Development of procedures for Identifying
Pesticide Toxicity in Ambient Waters: Carbofuran, Diazinon,
Chlorpyrifos. Environ Toxicol Chem, 15(6): 837-845.
88. Pensri Plangklang, Alissara Reungsang, International Biodeterioration
& Biodegradation 63 (2009) 515–522.
89. Harris, C.R., Chapman, R.A., Harris, C., and Tu. C.M., (1984).
Biodegradation of Pesticides in Soil: Rapid Induction of Carbamate
Degrading Factors After Carbofuran Treatment. Journal of
Environmental Science and Health, B19 1-11.
90. Turco, R.F. and Konopka. A., (1990). Biodegradation of Carbofuran
in Enhanced and Non-enhanced Soils. Soil Biology and
Biochemistry, 22:195-201.
91. Parkin, T.B., and Shelton, D.R., (1994). Modeling Environmental
Effects on Enhanced Carbofuran Degradation. Pesticide Science,
40:163-168.
92. D. L. Suett Crop Protection, (1986) Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 165-
169.
93. Raha, P., and Asit K. Das., (1990). Photodegradation of Carbofuran.
Chemosphere, 21(1-2):99-106.
94. Guoqing Wang, Zhenyu Hou, Yu’an Sun, Rongjie Zhang, Kui Xie,
Rongli Liu, (2006) Journal of Hazardous Materials 129, 22–30.
95. Kandaswamy, D., Chandrayan, K., Rjukkannu, K. and Blasubramanian,
K. (1977), Current Science, 46:289.
62
96. Greenhalgh, R., and Relangur, A., (1981). Persistence and uptake of
carbofuran in a humid mesisol and the effect of drying and storing soil
samples on residue level. J. Agric. Food Chem., 29(2): 231-253.
97. Brahmaprakash, G.P., and Sethunathan, M., (1985). Mineralization
of carbryl and carbofuran in soil planted to rice. Rice Research
News Letter. , CRRI 5(314): 2.
98. Arunachalam, K.D., and lakshmanan, M., (1990). Decomposition of
C14 labelled carbofuran in a black tropical soil under laboratory
condition. Soil boil. Biochem, 22(3): 407-412.
99. Jae –Koo Lee Kee -Sung. And Wills, B. Wleeler. (1991). Rice plant
up take of fresh and aged residues of Carbofuran from soil. J. Agric.
Food Chem., 39: 588 - 593.
100. Deuel, L. E., Price, J.D., Turner, F.T., and Brown. K.W., (1979).
Persistence of Carbofuran and its Metabolites, 3-Keto and 3-
Hydroxy Carbofuran, under Flooded Rice Culture. J Environ Qual,
8(1): 23-26.
101. Harries, C. R., (1969). Laboratory studies on the persistence of
biological activities of some insecticides in the soil. J. Econ. Ent.,
62: 1437 – 1441.
102. Gupta, R. C., and Dewan, R. S., (1974). Residues and metabolism
of carbofuran in soil. Pesticides., 8:(12): 36-39.
103. Das, N.M., and Pillai. K.S., (1975). Persistence of some systematic
insecticides in cowpea, when applied as granules in different soil
types of Kerala. Agric, Res. J. Kerala. , 13(2): 175–178.