Chapter 19 Nutrient Cycling and Retention. Objectives Students will be able to describe the major...
-
Upload
ava-bayless -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Chapter 19 Nutrient Cycling and Retention. Objectives Students will be able to describe the major...
Chapter 19Chapter 19Nutrient Cycling Nutrient Cycling
and Retentionand Retention
ObjectivesObjectives
Students will be able to describe the major Students will be able to describe the major reservoirs of important nutrients and the reservoirs of important nutrients and the processes that move nutrients between these processes that move nutrients between these pools and plant-usable exchangeable pools.pools and plant-usable exchangeable pools.
Students will be able to describe factors that Students will be able to describe factors that control biological nutrient cycling.control biological nutrient cycling.
Students will be able to describe experiments Students will be able to describe experiments to test the influence of factors on biological to test the influence of factors on biological nutrient cycling.nutrient cycling.
Energy Flows, Nutrients CycleEnergy Flows, Nutrients Cycle
Energy Flow Through Ecosystem
So
lar
Rad
iati
on
Hea
t R
adia
ted
to
Sp
ace
Hea
t R
adia
ted
to
Sp
ace
Energy Flow Drives Nutrient CyclesEnergy Flow Drives Nutrient Cycles
Nutrient PoolsNutrient Pools
Reservoir Pools:Reservoir Pools: The largest pool where The largest pool where most of the nutrient is found most of the nutrient is found
AtmosphereAtmosphere HydrosphereHydrosphere LithosphereLithosphere
Exchangeable Pools:Exchangeable Pools: The pool / chemical The pool / chemical form(s) of nutrients that are available for use form(s) of nutrients that are available for use by living organisms by living organisms – Dissolved in waterDissolved in water– Free ions on soil particlesFree ions on soil particles– Organic matterOrganic matter
Fluxes: ReservoirFluxes: Reservoir Exchangeable Pools Exchangeable Pools
NutrientNutrientReservoirReservoir
PoolPoolFluxFlux FluxFlux
ExchangeableExchangeablePool (s)Pool (s)
Carbon Carbon (Gaseous)(Gaseous)
AtmosphereAtmosphere PhotosynthesisPhotosynthesis
RespirationRespiration
Organic matterOrganic matter
NitrogenNitrogen(Gaseous)(Gaseous)
AtmosphereAtmosphere N-fixationN-fixation
De-nitrificationDe-nitrification
NHNH44, NO, NO22 in soil in soil
& water; protein & water; protein in organic matterin organic matter
MineralMineralNutrients:Nutrients:PhosphorousPhosphorousMagnesiumMagnesiumCalciumCalciumPotassiumPotassium
Rock in the Rock in the Earth’s crustEarth’s crust
WeatheringWeathering
Leaching &Leaching &SedimentationSedimentation
Free ions in soil Free ions in soil & water; organic & water; organic mattermatter
Generalized Nutrient CycleGeneralized Nutrient CycleReservoir Pool
Atmosphere Lithosphere
Abiotic Exchangeable PoolSoil Water
Organic Matter in Plants
Dead Organic Matter Organic Matterin Herbivores
Organic Matter in Carnivores
Organic MatterIn Detritivores
Organic MatterIn Bacteria & Fungi Excretion Decomposition Mineralization
Nutrient CyclingNutrient Cycling
Fluxes from reservoir to exchangeable pools are Fluxes from reservoir to exchangeable pools are often slow (weathering, N-fixation).often slow (weathering, N-fixation).
Most nutrients in exchangeable pools are present Most nutrients in exchangeable pools are present due to nutrient cycling.due to nutrient cycling.
– DecompositionDecomposition
– MineralizationMineralization
Losses from the exchangeable pool due to erosion, Losses from the exchangeable pool due to erosion, harvesting, sedimentation must be replaced by harvesting, sedimentation must be replaced by fluxes from reservoir pool.fluxes from reservoir pool.
Gaseous nutrients are replaced more rapidly than Gaseous nutrients are replaced more rapidly than mineral (sedimentary) nutrients.mineral (sedimentary) nutrients.
Factors That Influence Rate of Factors That Influence Rate of Decomposition and Nutrient CyclingDecomposition and Nutrient Cycling
Climate:Climate: Metabolic rate of organisms in Metabolic rate of organisms in detrital food web controlled by temperature detrital food web controlled by temperature and water availability.and water availability.
Nutrient Availability (in environment and in Nutrient Availability (in environment and in dead organic matter):dead organic matter): Low nutrient content Low nutrient content in DOM and in the environment slows in DOM and in the environment slows population growth of decomposer species.population growth of decomposer species.
GrazersGrazers accelerate the breakdown of plant accelerate the breakdown of plant organic matter and nutrient re-cycling.organic matter and nutrient re-cycling.
Decomposition of Decomposition of Tree LeavesTree LeavesDry vs. Wet EnvironmentsDry vs. Wet Environments
Decrease in mass of dead organic matter over time is the measure of decomposition rate
Leaves decomposed faster in the wet environment
Decomposition Rate Decomposition Rate Is Directly Related to Is Directly Related to Actual Evapotrans-Actual Evapotrans-
piration Ratepiration Rate
Why ?
Ecosystems with high AE have high rainfall and high temperature.
Good conditions for microbial activity.
Decomposition Decomposition Rate Is Greater In Rate Is Greater In Tropical vs. Temperate ForestsTropical vs. Temperate Forests
Plant Matter w/ High Plant Matter w/ High Nutritional Value Nutritional Value
Decomposes FasterDecomposes Faster
Foliage w/ Low C:N Ratio and Low Content of Cellulose and Lignin Decomposes Faster.
Decomposition Rate vs. Decomposition Rate vs. Lignin and Lignin and NNitrogen itrogen
CContentontent of Leaf Matter of Leaf Matter
Warmer
Cooler
BadFood
Why is the ground in a pine forest covered with dead pine needles ?
Is this a problem ?
Decomposition Rates Increase with Greater Nutrient Availability in the Environment
Decomposition Rate vs. [Phosphorus] in Stream Water
At high phosphorous levels, further increases did not increase decomp-osition rate. WHY NOT ?
At low phosphorous levels, increasing P caused significant increase in decomposition rate of leaf matter
Effect of Effect of GGrazing on razing on PPlant lant BBiomass iomass TTurnoverurnover (Nutrient Cycling) (Nutrient Cycling)
Prairie Dog Grazing Accelerates Prairie Dog Grazing Accelerates Nitrogen Re-CyclingNitrogen Re-Cycling
Impacts of Human Activities On Impacts of Human Activities On Nutrient CyclesNutrient Cycles
ObjectivesObjectives
Students will be able to describe how Students will be able to describe how agriculture and forestry impact soil nutrient agriculture and forestry impact soil nutrient budgets.budgets.
– How factors of rotation length, harvest intensity, How factors of rotation length, harvest intensity, and nature of the nutrient influence impact.and nature of the nutrient influence impact.
– Consequences / Mitigation of Consequences / Mitigation of nutrient depletionnutrient depletion
Students will be able to describe how human Students will be able to describe how human activities can saturate natural ecosystem activities can saturate natural ecosystem nutrient pools and the consequences of nutrient pools and the consequences of nutrient saturationnutrient saturation..
Agriculture and ForestryAgriculture and Forestry
HarvestingHarvesting of biomass and of biomass and soil erosionsoil erosion from from human crop systems remove nutrients from human crop systems remove nutrients from the ecosystem.the ecosystem.
Natural fluxes from reservoir pool replenish Natural fluxes from reservoir pool replenish exchangeable nutrient pools, depending on exchangeable nutrient pools, depending on rates of input vs. output in harvests.rates of input vs. output in harvests.
Additions of manure and chemical fertilizer Additions of manure and chemical fertilizer often necessary to maintain exchangeable often necessary to maintain exchangeable nutrient pools in soil (and productivity)nutrient pools in soil (and productivity)
Balancing the Nutrient BudgetBalancing the Nutrient Budget
Exchangeable Nutrient Pool
In the Soil
WeatheringOf Soil Minerals
AtmosphericDeposition
Manure
Fertiliz
ation
Nutrients inharvested crop
Soil erosion
Nutrient leachingDecompositionof crop residue
RapidLoss
SlowlyReplenished
Harvest Interval and Nutrient DepletionHarvest Interval and Nutrient DepletionS
oil
Exc
han
gea
ble
Nu
trie
nt
Po
ol
Time
With enough time between harvest removals, the exchangeable nutrient pool is maintained by natural fluxes from reservoir pool
Long Rotation (Forestry)|---Harvest Interval---|
Harvest Interval and Nutrient DepletionHarvest Interval and Nutrient DepletionS
oil
Exc
han
gea
ble
Nu
trie
nt
Po
ol
Time
With insufficient time between harvests to allow for natural replenishment, soil nutrient pools are depleted.Crop production will decrease over time.
Long rotation
Short Rotation (Agriculture)
HarvestInterval
Harvest Intensity and Nutrient DepletionHarvest Intensity and Nutrient Depletion
Corn
Cotton
So
il E
xch
ang
eab
le N
utr
ien
t P
oo
ls
Time
Crops that remove a larger amount of nutrients require a longer time period between harvests or soil nutrient pools will be depleted.
Harvesting Effects On Different NutrientsHarvesting Effects On Different NutrientsS
oil
Exc
han
gea
ble
Nu
trie
nt
Po
ol
Time
Rapid Input Flux from Reservoir Pool (N)
Slow Input Flux from Reservoir Pool (P)
Slowly cycled mineral nutrients (Ca, Mg, K, P) are more readily depleted than more rapidly cycled gaseous nutrients (N, C, S).
Managing Soil FertilityManaging Soil FertilityCrop Rotation: 4 Year CycleCrop Rotation: 4 Year Cycle
Nutrient Extractive Crop(Corn, Cotton, Wheat, Rice)
Fallow Year (No Crop)Replenish Soil Nutrients
Hay, Grass Cover
“Green Manure” CropReplenish Soil Organic Matter
Hay, Alfalfa
N-Fixing CropReplenish Soil N Pool
(Soybean, Alfalfa)
Managing Soil FertilityManaging Soil FertilityCrop Rotation: 2 Year CycleCrop Rotation: 2 Year Cycle
Nutrient Extractive Crop(Corn, Cotton, Wheat, Rice)
N-Fixing CropReplenish Soil N Pool
(Soybean, Alfalfa)
What about….
Other Nutrients (Ca, Mg, K, P) ?Chemical LimingAnd Fertilization
Soil Organic Matter ? Degraded water retention, aeration, drainage
Corn YieldU.S.A
WheatYield
Major gains in crop production from the Green Revolution required massive increases in the use of chemical fertilizer
Fertilizer Use and the Green Revolution
A Case StudyA Case StudyAgricultural Trends In Georgia (USA): 1940 – 1990Agricultural Trends In Georgia (USA): 1940 – 1990
Acreage of agricultural land decreased by Acreage of agricultural land decreased by 50% (farm abandonment)50% (farm abandonment)
State-wide total agricultural crop production State-wide total agricultural crop production increased by 100%increased by 100%
Crop yield per acre increased 4-fold.Crop yield per acre increased 4-fold.
How did this happen ???How did this happen ???
A Case StudyA Case StudyAgricultural Trends In Georgia (USA): 1940 – 1990Agricultural Trends In Georgia (USA): 1940 – 1990
Total use of fertilizer (per acre) increasedTotal use of fertilizer (per acre) increased 7-fold7-fold
Use of Nitrogen fertilizer increased Use of Nitrogen fertilizer increased 11-fold11-fold..
Is this a problem ?Is this a problem ?
– Excess nutrients from fertilizer washes into Excess nutrients from fertilizer washes into streams, lakes, and groundwater (more later).streams, lakes, and groundwater (more later).
– Dependence on expensive fertilizers puts farmers Dependence on expensive fertilizers puts farmers at economic risk.at economic risk.
Agricultural EconomicsAgricultural Economics
Fertilization IncreasesCrop Yields (and also Costs)
Increased Grain Supply to Consumer Market
Price per Bushel Decreases
Farmer Income Decreases:Grain Sales Receipt – Costs (fuel, seed, fertilizer)
N-fertilizer made using fossil fuel. Sensitive to price fluctuations
The same companies that buy the crops also sell the seed and fertilizer.
Agriculture In the Wet TropicsAgriculture In the Wet Tropics
A Cautionary Tale of Nutrient A Cautionary Tale of Nutrient Cycling Limits for AgricultureCycling Limits for Agriculture
Total Ecosystem Carbon In Boreal Total Ecosystem Carbon In Boreal and Tropical Forest Ecosystemsand Tropical Forest Ecosystems
0
20
40
60
80
100
Boreal Tropical
Forest Type
% T
ota
l E
cosy
stem
Car
bo
n
Leaf
Wood
Litter
Soil
Slash-and-Burn AgricultureSlash-and-Burn Agriculture
Cut-down and burn forest vegetation to Cut-down and burn forest vegetation to release nutrients to the soil.release nutrients to the soil.
Initially, crop yields are high.Initially, crop yields are high.
Crop yields progressively decline.Crop yields progressively decline.
Field abandoned after 3 to 5 years.Field abandoned after 3 to 5 years.
Sustainable w/ SMALL human populations, Sustainable w/ SMALL human populations, but NOT w/ large human populations.but NOT w/ large human populations.
Nutrient Leaching After Slash-and BurnNutrient Leaching After Slash-and Burn
0
1
2
3
4
Kg
/ h
a /
mo Control
Cut-Burned
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
Calcium
Cut
Burned Abandoned
High crop yields immediately after burn are associated with a large pulse of basic cations into the soil from the burned vegetation
Decreasing crop yields over 3-5 years associated with decreased pools of basic cations in the soil
Primary Productivity (kg / ha/ yr) of Primary Productivity (kg / ha/ yr) of Rain Forest vs. Slash-and-Burn CropRain Forest vs. Slash-and-Burn Crop
Year 1Year 1After BurnAfter Burn
Year 2Year 2After BurnAfter Burn
Year 3Year 3After BurnAfter Burn
RainforestRainforestTotal NPPTotal NPP
12,74212,742 12,99512,995 12,92012,920
Yucca CropYucca Crop(edible part)(edible part)
1,4651,465 1,0061,006 700700
CropCropTotal NPPTotal NPP
5,3335,333 5,2945,294 31503150
““Weeds”Weeds”Total NPPTotal NPP
300300 679679 990990
Slash-BurnSlash-BurnTotal NPPTotal NPP
56335633 59735973 41404140
Phosphorous Dynamics of Slash-and-BurnPhosphorous Dynamics of Slash-and-Burn
P in Atmospheric Dust P in Soil Minerals
Plant-Available PIn the Soil
Insoluble PIn the Soil
P in PlantBiomass
Deposition Weathering
Uptake
Low pH – P precipitatesNeutral pH – P dissolves
Decompositionand Burning
P-removalin harvested
biomass
P-loss to atmosphere
in ash from fire
P-loss due to leaching andsoil erosion
Very lowVery lowin intactin intactrain forestrain forestecosystemsecosystems
Phosphorous Dynamics in Tropical Phosphorous Dynamics in Tropical Soil After Slash-and-BurnSoil After Slash-and-Burn
ControlControlOne month One month since burnsince burn
20 months 20 months since burnsince burn
4 years after 4 years after abandonmentabandonment
Available P Available P (ppm)(ppm)
4.84.8 7.47.4 13.013.0 4.74.7
Soil pHSoil pH 4.254.25 4.964.96 5.155.15 4.524.52
Total P Total P (ppm)(ppm)
200200 130130 250250 300300
% Available% Available 2.42.4 5.75.7 5.25.2 1.61.6
There is a large pool of soil phosphorous, but only a small percentage is available for plant uptake. Ash from burning increases soil pH, increasing the amount of plant-available P
Burn Rain Forest(release nutrients from biomass to soil)
Increase Base Cations Ca, Mg,
K in soil
IncreasedSoil pH
IncreaseExchangeablePhosphorous
Decrease ToxicMetals Fe, Mn, Al
High Crop Yields
Removal ofCa, Mg, KIn Crops
Loss of CaMg, K viaLeaching
DecreasedSoil pH
Decreased Exchangeable P
Increased ToxicMetals Fe, Mn, Al
Decreased Crop Yields
&Increased“Weeds”
LandAbandonment
Re-Growth ofTropical Rainforest(Recovery Phase)
The Slash-andBurn Cycle
Nutrient SaturationNutrient SaturationThe Other Side of Human The Other Side of Human
Impacts on Nutrient CyclesImpacts on Nutrient Cycles
Soil Nutrient Capacity vs. ContentSoil Nutrient Capacity vs. Content
SoilContent
NaturalInputs
Plant Uptake -Harvest Loss
DecompositionMineralizationN-FixationWeathering
If losses exceed inputs If losses exceed inputs ► Nutrient depletion► Nutrient depletion(Content << Capacity)(Content << Capacity)
Nutrient SaturationNutrient Saturation
SoilContent
Natural Inputs+
Human Inputs
PlantUptake
FertilizerAcid RainManure
Leaching to
GroundwaterIf inputs exceed losses If inputs exceed losses ► Nutrient saturation► Nutrient saturation
(Content = Capacity)(Content = Capacity)
Nitrate Application On U.S. FarmsNitrate Application On U.S. Farms
IndianaIndiana
Algae In Gulf Coast WatersAlgae In Gulf Coast Waters
““Dead Zone” FormationDead Zone” Formation
(Hypoxic Bottom Water)(Hypoxic Bottom Water)
Gulf of Mexico Dead ZoneGulf of Mexico Dead Zone
““Acid Rain” Adds Excess NutrientsAcid Rain” Adds Excess NutrientsExcess Inputs of N and S From AtmosphereExcess Inputs of N and S From Atmosphere
Soil Saturated w/ N and S
Excess NO3- and SO4
- Leach From Soil
Base Cations Ca, Mg, K, Na Leach From Soil
Decreased Soil pH
Increased Toxic Soluble AlIncreased Toxic Soluble Al
Decreased Plant Growth“Forest Decline”
Excess Al Leaches Into StreamsAl Toxicity Kills Aquatic Organisms
“Dead Lakes”
SummarySummary
““Sustainability” of agricultural production Sustainability” of agricultural production systems and “Health” of natural ecosystems systems and “Health” of natural ecosystems require balancing of nutrient budgets.require balancing of nutrient budgets.
Nutrient depletion of agricultural systems Nutrient depletion of agricultural systems requires expensive chemical fertilization that requires expensive chemical fertilization that may not be sustainable long-term.may not be sustainable long-term.
Nutrient saturation of natural systems is a Nutrient saturation of natural systems is a major risk to ecosystem health.major risk to ecosystem health.
The EndThe End