Chapter 16

25
Prepared for 2010 Graduate seminar Informetrics and e-research (prof. Han Woo Park), at Yeungnam Univ. in S. Korea Situated Innovations in e-Social Science Bridgette Wessels and Max Craglia Presented by Kim Kyoung Eun [email protected] 3. May 2010

description

 

Transcript of Chapter 16

Page 1: Chapter 16

Prepared for 2010 Graduate seminarInformetrics and e-research (prof. Han Woo Park),at Yeungnam Univ. in S. Korea

Situated Innovations in e-Social Sci-ence

Bridgette Wessels and Max Craglia

Presented by Kim Kyoung [email protected]

3. May 2010

Page 2: Chapter 16

Introduction▶ This chapter explores a user-led approach in the de-

velopment of e-social science in which an interdiscipli-nary team integrated technical infrastructure, collabo-ration, and knowledge in the development of e-social science.

▶ In this chapter, ‘development’ refers to the work done by researchers to adapt Grid technologies to address an interdisciplinary social research problem.

Page 3: Chapter 16

▶ The e-social science pilot project discussed in this chapter addressed three main dimensions of e-social science.

⑴ identification of new social research foci (focus) ⑵ adapting research processes ⑶ developing tools

⇒ The way in which these three dimensions of the project were integrated shows that the develop-ment of computer-mediated research using the Grid can develop relevant and innovative tools for the social sciences.

Introduction

Page 4: Chapter 16

The Pilot Project

▶ The substantive social science focus of the project “Col-laborative Analysis of Offender’ Personal and Area-based Social Exclusion” was to explore the extent to which indi-vidual and neighborhood effects are able to account for the geographical variation of crime patterns.

: the project had two main objectives To explore, quantify and model the spatial distribution of

crime in relation to socio-economic and neighborhood characteristics based on user-driven applications of Grid technology.

To reflect critically on the evolving relationship among social scientists, technologists, and the Grid for the de-velopment of training material and the further deploy-ment of Grid technology in the social sciences.

Page 5: Chapter 16

▶ Three Main groups of actors took part in the project :

⑴ a core team of academic researchers ⑵ project partners and data providers from the re-

gional policy-making community ⑶ external private sector data-suppliers who ren-

dered support service, university Grid infrastruc-ture and tools, and Web services developers

The Pilot Project

Page 6: Chapter 16

▶ The core research team: 3 urban planners with Geographical Information

Systems(GIS) expertise / 2 criminologists / 2 sociologists (including the ethnographer) / 1 computer sci-

entist (Grid Officer)

▶ The support services group : the academic White Rose Grid(WRG) consortium / the

Open Geospatial Consortium(OGC) ▶ Other data source : the Census accessed through MIMAS /

the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2004

-> three group of social scientists, data provider/practitioners / technology providers collaborated in exploring the possibili-ties of the Grid for use in the social sciences.

The Pilot Project

Page 7: Chapter 16

Technology and Innovation in the Project

▶ The analytical framework of the project was based on the social shaping definitions of ‘tech-nology’ and ‘innovation’.

: ‘technology’ - “set of physical object… human ac-tivities… and knowledge”

: ‘innovation’ – a complex social activity, involving learning processes and the interaction and shar-ing of expertise among different actors in the project network.

Page 8: Chapter 16

▶ Changes to practices and tools were made from action situated in the project required researchers to learn new techniques and perspectives in de-veloping e-social science.

The researchers worked with existing social science classification systems and had to combine them in new ways : ‘the methodological articulation’

The meetings and workshops enable the ‘artful in-tegration’ of innovative technology, the Grid, with the social and material worlds of academic per-spectives and methods.

Technology and Innovation in the Project

Page 9: Chapter 16

▶ The approach of the team was that the knowledge and practices of social science should shape the technological development.

- The researchers adopted an inductive approach to: ⑴ explore the different disciplinary approaches in the study of the relationship between young people at risk of crime and the characteristics of their neighborhood, ⑵ develop the methodology and relevant tools from the needs of the social science research.

The researchers made sense of the research problem through this inductive approach that led to deductive sta-tistical modeling and systematic computer-supported data processing.

The team aligned the above approach with design in use methodology.

Shaping New computer-Supported Research Tools

Page 10: Chapter 16

Shaping New computer-Supported Research Tools

▶ The process of design and use was integrated in pilot project.

- The project trajectory was : 1. Development of multi-disciplinary collaborative research

and research partnership. 2. Discussion of theoretical issues to underpin the multi-dis-

ciplinary approach. 3. Training for the social scientists and technological devel-

opment of the Grid. 4. Integration and analysis of the datasets. 5. Further Grid development and sharing outcomes among

partners.

-> Each of these phases in the trajectory is elaborated below.

Page 11: Chapter 16

Phase1: Developing Multi-Disciplinary Collaborative Research.

▶ The fostering of the collaborative approach con-sisted of a range of meetings and discussions within the core team, and between the core team and the policy and practitioners group, and with the technical expert from the OGC. (Open Geospatial Consortium)

-> In the next meetings of the core team, each of

the researchers discussed their disciplinary ap-proach to the research problem, data sources, and theoretical perspectives.

: urban planner / criminologist / sociologist / Grid officer

Page 12: Chapter 16

▶ The core team also had to develop a dialogue and shared understanding with the project-partners.

The official ‘Kick-off meeting’ involved the core team meeting with representatives from regional policy mak-ers, service and data providers, and technology providers. (OGC & WRG)

: The focus of the kick-off meeting was to outline the project, look at the kind of data needed, and introduce everyone to the Grid.

: The time and effort spent by the core team at this stage paid off by allowing each partner to see potential value in the project, rather than forcing each of them to subscribe to an assumed single shared objective.

Phase1: Developing Multi-Disciplinary Col-laborative Research

Page 13: Chapter 16

▶ In this phase of the project, the core team fur-thered its discussion of the research problem and conducted literature reviews focusing on envi-ronmental criminology, Grid technology, and risk factors for young people.

: In particular, the sociologist were concerned to develop a theoretical framework that would in-form the multi-disciplinary research and help to select datasets and research methodologies.

Phase 2: Theoretical Frameworks

Page 14: Chapter 16

▶ They developed research questions to aid the re-searchers in developing a multi-disciplinary frame-work.

- The questions were:1. Can we construct a reliable set of measures for com-

munity-based risk factors that allow us to measure them at ward or neighborhood level?

2. Can we create a ‘national norm’ with which to com-pare?

3. If so, what relationship might exist between levels of risk and levels of crime - are neighborhoods in com-munities with high-risk level young people also areas with high-risk factors?

4. What relationship might exist between levels of risk and levels of crime?

Phase 2: Theoretical Frameworks

Page 15: Chapter 16

▶ The Grid officer took part in all the meetings could learn to appreciate the social science per-spective.

He felt that understanding social science would help him to develop Grid-related tools and training for the social scientists.

The Grid officer pointed out that access to such sys-tems(UNIX or LINUX) requires familiarity with client applications and protocols for transferring data and communicating with remote systems, which is further complicated by the introduction of modern protocols for secure communication.

Phase 2: Theoretical Frameworks

Page 16: Chapter 16

Phase 3: Training for the Social Scientists

▶ The core team took part in three technological and three statistical training workshops, held in the University’s computer training rooms. The re-searchers were given passwords and identifiers to work on the WRG.

: Graphic User Interfaces(GUIs) application / X pro-

tocol / secure protocols such as secure shell client(SSH) ⇒ These procedures were new to many social sci-

entists and required an understanding of the re-lated concepts and practices.

Page 17: Chapter 16

Phase 3: Training for the Social Scientists

▶ The second half of the workshop series : learning the basis of the statistical package, SPlus, and the geo-graphical information system (GIS) ArcView, as well as accessing various datasets in using the Grid.

The researchers’ training on the Grid enabled them to open ArcView on Titania and to begin to work with the idea of a cluster system.

- The core team tested the applications by developing a facility for accessing and querying census data via MIMAS

Page 18: Chapter 16

Phase 4: Integration and Analysis of the Datasets

▶ The analysis of data was divided into two stages: ⑴ the team analyzed individual variables of the crime

and youth datasets, including aggregation at census geography level, calculation of counts, rates, and standardized rates, and identified outliers and ex-treme values

⑵ the researchers analyzed the key variables to iden-tify statistically significant relationships, supported by the review of the literature on environmental criminology.

Page 19: Chapter 16

▶ There are integration of the research outcomes be-tween criminologists and urban planners and social scientist of the offence at South Yorkshire.

: Given that very little data linking victims and offenders had previously been available, these are important quantitative findings, which confirm qualitative inter-views with young offenders and contribute to the the-oretical and policy debates in this field.

: The strong link between census data and offenders, on the one hand, and offenders and victimization, on the other, made a very good case for trying to model the geographical distribution of offenders on a national basis using the census variables and to use the out-come as a relative ‘risk’ map for the victimization.

Phase 4: Integration and Analysis of the Datasets

Page 20: Chapter 16

▶ After developing a model of the distribution of of-fenders for South Yorkshire and validating it against the observed results, the model was ex-tended to the whole of England at SOA and then filtered through a 1 hectare-cell Grid based on the residential postcodes provided by the national postal service.

The advantage of this procedure was that it re-ported the results of the model more accurately in relation to where people live.

Phase 5: Grid Development and Sharing Outcomes among Partners

Page 21: Chapter 16

※ Figure 16.3 (303P) : shows the portal the Grid Officer de-veloped for the researchers to access the application.

The researchers, having imported an ASCII file with the data, could then select the number of processors on which to operate. The portal would then schedule the operation via the Globus Middleware, based on the schema showed in Figure 16.1.

※ Figure 16.4 (305P) : By installing WMS (Web map ser-vice) on both the university’s and partners’ web servers it was possible to overlay the maps of the model results with those of the policy boundaries, and query the over-lay to retrieve the attribute information as illustrated in Figure 16.4.

Phase 5: Grid Development and Sharing Outcomes among Partners

Page 22: Chapter 16

Discussion

▶ The aim of user-driven and research-led development was to appropriate the Grid in ways that relevant to so-cial science.

To explore the relationships between technology, research practice, and knowledge in producing e-social science the project adopted a collaborative approach in develop-ing first practical use.

The project shows that the interplay of research practices, on the one hand, and Grid technologies, on the other, is highly situational, and that and first use require the art-ful integration of different practices, communities, and technologies.

The researchers collaborating with others in situated inno-vations contributed their disciplinary perspective as well as methodological and technological knowledge.

Page 23: Chapter 16

▶ The team demonstrated that not all work re-quires the Grid, but identifies the context in which the Grid is beneficial for social scientists.

Of central importance to the success of the project was the time and effort required to develop a shared understanding of the data.

As this project shows, accessing data is more than a matter of technology - it requires the develop-ment and maintenance of a relationship of trust between provider and researcher.

Discussion

Page 24: Chapter 16

▶ Collaboration needs to move beyond gaining an understanding of a research problem toward inte-grating and developing a coherent research methodology, analysis, and representation.

From a criminological point of view, further re-search is needed to validate the model developed for the whole country with data provided by po-lice forces other than South Yorkshire.

Further research regarding semantic interoperabil-ity should explore appropriate methods to ana-lyze data based on the theoretical constructs of different disciplines.

Discussion

Page 25: Chapter 16

Thank you for your attention!

Presented by Kim Kyoung [email protected]