Love of Money is the Root of All Evil IS THIS STATEMENT TRUE OR FALSE?
Chapter 14 The Debate over Monetary and Fiscal Policy The love of money is the root of all evil. THE...
-
Upload
kathlyn-flynn -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
1
Transcript of Chapter 14 The Debate over Monetary and Fiscal Policy The love of money is the root of all evil. THE...
Chapter 14
The Debate over Monetary
and Fiscal Policy
The love of money is the root of all evil.THE NEW TESTAMENT
Lack of money is the root of all evil.GEORGE BERNARD SHAW
Outline
• Quantity theory of money• Monetarism• Fiscal policy revisited• Debate over fiscal and monetary policy
Velocity & Quantity Theory Of Money
• Velocity– Speed at which money circulates
– Number of times per year an “average dollar” is spent on goods & services
– Velocity = Nominal GDP / Money StockVelocity = Nominal GDP / Money Stock
3
GDP Nominal Velocity supply Money
M
GDP NominalVelocity
M
YP
Velocity & Quantity Theory Of Money
• Equation of Exchange
4
YPVM
Velocity & Quantity Theory Of Money
• Quantity theory of money– Equation of exchange
– Economic model
– Changes in velocity – minor• Velocity - constant
– Nominal GDP• Proportional to money stock
5
YPVM %%%%
Velocity of circulation for M1 and M2, 1929–2007
Figure 1
6
Velocity & Quantity Theory Of Money
• Determinants of velocity– Efficiency of payments system decreases
M, and hence increases v• Financial innovation: credit card, …• Computerization: online banking, …
– Interest rates (opportunity cost of holding cash)• Higher r → lower M, higher velocity
7
Caveat for Fed Monetary Policy
• Fed – increase money supply (M↑)– Interest rates – decrease
– Velocity – decrease
– M ˣ V increase < increase in M
– Fed should take into account the Fed should take into account the change of v when conducts monetary change of v when conducts monetary policypolicy
Velocity & Quantity Theory Of Money
• Monetarism – Start with equation of exchange
• Equation of exchange – growth rate form
• Given ∆V, ∆M directlydirectly affects change in nominal GDP ∆(PY)
• Keynesian approach: monetary policy indirectlyindirectly affect I through interest rate
9
YPVM %%%%
Monetarism
• In short-run, V and Y are constant
• Inflation is always a monetary phenomenonInflation is always a monetary phenomenon
PM %%
Money supply and Inflation
Discussion
• Why the growth rate of M2 is always Why the growth rate of M2 is always higher than that of inflation? higher than that of inflation? (Monetarism predicts that they should (Monetarism predicts that they should be same)be same)
Fiscal Policy, Interest Rates, & Velocity
• Monetary policy– Increase bank reserves & money supply
• Reduce interest rates• Stimulates demand for investment
• Fiscal policy– Increases in G or tax cuts
• Raise Y and P through multiplier effect• PY↑ increases money demand• Pushes up interest rates
13
Fiscal Policy, Interest Rates, & Velocity
• Rise in G– Pushes interest rates higher
• Deters some investment spending (“crowding-crowding-outout” effect)
• Increase in C + I + G + (X - IM) - smaller
• Oversimplified formula 1/(1-MPC)– Overstates multiplier
1.Ignores variable importsvariable imports
2.Ignores price-level changesprice-level changes
3.Ignores income taxincome tax
4.Ignores rising interest ratesrising interest rates 14
Fiscal Policy, Interest Rates, & Velocity
• Reduce budget deficit– Contractionary fiscal policies
• Lower spending or higher taxes
– Reduce real interest rates
– Spur investment spending
15
Debate: Fiscal or Monetary Policy?• Which one is more powerfulmore powerful?
– Keynesian: fiscal policy– Monetarist: monetary policy
• Which one works fasterfaster?
– Expenditure lag: fiscal policy is faster• G or T affects AD more promptly
– Policy lag: monetary policy is shorter• Made frequently (FOMC) • Executed immediately (OMO)• Fiscal policy has to go through annual budget
cycle
Debate: the Fed - Control M or r?
• Keynesian: Fed should use OMO to control rr
• Monetarist: control MM since it is the major driving force behind inflation
17
Debate: the Fed - Control M or r?• Fed cannot control both r and M
simultaneously• Demand curve for money - shifts outward (by
expansionary fiscal policy)
– Rise in interest rates ( r)– Rise in money stock (M)– The Fed
• Keep M steady (use OMO sale)– r - rises even more
• Keep r steady (use OMO purchase)– M – rises even more
The Federal Reserve’s policy dilemma
Figure 2
19
0
Money Supply (in billions of dollars)
840830
Inte
rest
Rat
es
10%9
8765
4321
S
M D0
M0
D1
M1
A
W
850
ZE
For given Fed policy
Money demand shifts out
Debate: the Fed - Control M or r?• Dilemma of monetary policy target• Target money supply (M)
– Demand for money – variable• Difficult• Wide fluctuations in interest rates
• Target interest rates (r)– Change money supply to stabilize r
• Destabilize economy (M↑ in boom, M↓ in recession)
– AD↑ → Y and P↑ → Md↑ → r↑ → Fed has to lower down r by using OMO purchase → M↑ → AD↑ 20
Debate: the Fed - Control M or r?
• What has Fed really done?– Post WWII – target interest rates– 1960s – monetarism
• Interest rate pegging actually destabilize the economy
• Should stabilize money supply growth rate
– 1979 – Volcker shifted the Fed target to money stock growth
– 1982 – back to target interest rates– 1993 – Greenspan confirmed that Fed was
no longer using M to guide policy 21
The behavior of interest rates, 1979–1985
Figure 3
22
Debate: Shape of Aggregate Supply Curve
• Aggregate supply curve – flat– Large increase in output
– Little inflation
– Anti-recession policy - successful
– Restrictive stabilization policy - fighting inflation by contracting AD – not effective
23
Alternative views of the aggregate supply curve
Figure 4
24
Real GDP
Pric
e le
vel
S
S
(a)
Real GDP
Pric
e le
vel
S
S
(b)
Steep aggregate
supply curve
Flat aggregate
supply curve
Stabilization policy with a flat aggregate supply curve
Figure 5
25
Pric
e Le
vel
0
Real GDP
6,4006,000
S
S
D0
D0
100
E101
D1
D1
A
(a) Expansionary policy
Pric
e Le
vel
0
Real GDP
5,600 6,000
S
S
D0
D0
100
E
99
D2
D2
B
(b) Contractionary policy
Rise in
output
Rise in priceFall in price
Fall in
output
Debate: Shape of Aggregate Supply Curve
• Aggregate supply curve – steep– Small increase in output
– Great inflation
– Expansionary fiscal or monetary policy• Great inflation• Little change in GDP
– Contractionary policy – effective• Decrease price level
26
Stabilization policy, a steep aggregate supply curve
Figure 6
27
Pric
e Le
vel
0
Real GDP
6,1006,000
S
S D0
D0
100
E110
D1
D1
A
(a) Expansionary policy
Pric
e Le
vel
0
Real GDP
5,900 6,000
S
S D0
D0
100
E
90
D2
D2
B
(b) Contractionary policy
Rise in
output
Rise in price
Fall in price
Fall in output
Debate: Shape of Aggregate Supply Curve
• Steepness of aggregate supply schedule– Depends on time period
• Very short run – flatflat aggregate supply– Workers cannot predict the inflation
accurately, real wage ↓, firms thus like to expand the capacity
– Fluctuations in aggregate demand• Large effects on output• Minor effects on prices
28
Debate: Shape of Aggregate S Curve
• Long run – steepsteep aggregate supply – Workers get enough information and
experience to predict the inflation, real wage not eroded by P↑, firms thus reluctant to increase production
– Changes in demand• Affect prices, not output
Debate: Shape of Aggregate Supply Curve
• Any change in AD will have most of its effect on outputoutput in the short run but on pricesprices in the long run
Debate: Should Government Intervene?
• Some economists (most liberal) advocate active stabilization policy– Policy has to be discretionarydiscretionary
– G↑ or T↓ or lower r when recessionary gap, “lean against the windlean against the wind”
– Reverse when inflationary gap
31
Debate: Should Government Intervene?
• Stabilization policy– Difficulties in forecasting demand– Long lags– May destabilize the economy
• Some economists (most conservative) argue– Natural self-correcting forces– Automatic stabilizers – Passive policy, adhere to fixed rulesfixed rules
Discussion
• Rule vs. Discretionary, which one do Rule vs. Discretionary, which one do you prefer?you prefer?
A typical business cycle
Figure 7
34
Time
Act
ual a
nd P
oten
tial G
DP
Potential GDP
Actual GDP
CB
D
E
A
Rules-vs.-Discretion Debate
• Economy’s self-correcting mechanism– If fast & efficient - No intervention
– If slow - Discretionary policy
• Lags in stabilization policy• Accuracy of economic forecasts• Size of government – bogus argument• Uncertainties - by government policy• Political business cycle
– Expansionary policy near election35
Rules-vs.-Discretion Debate• Kydland & Prescott: “Time Inconsistency
Problem”• Public observes policy-makers and forms
expectations of their likely actions.• Policy-makers with discretion can renege
on today’s pronouncements tomorrow; so, the public may come to discount such pronouncements as cheap talk
• Rules produce time-consistent outcomes because they make policy-makers’ pronouncements crediblecredible.
Summary
• Quantity Theory of Money: MV=PY• Monetarism: inflation is always a
monetary phenomenon• Debate over monetary and fiscal policy
– Should we reply on Mon or Fis policy?– Should Fed control M or r?– AS curve is flat or steep?– Government intervention: rule vs.
discretion