Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in...

57
Chapter 13 Urban Patterns

Transcript of Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in...

Page 1: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

Chapter 13

Urban Patterns

Page 2: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

Percent Urban Population

Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

Page 3: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

Percent Urban by Region

Fig. 13-2b: Although under half of the people in most less developed regions are urban, Latin America and the Middle East have urban percentages comparable to MDCs.

Page 4: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

The exceptional nature of American cities

1: Gigantic “footprints” for the urbanized area– Chicago vs. London– Low densities– The predominance of SFDs

2: Suburban Dominance– Only 3 million out of 8 million in Chicago

metropolitan area live in the city of Chicago

3: Much greater levels of automobile dependency

Page 5: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 6: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 7: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 8: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 9: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 10: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 11: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

4. Very steep density gradients– High-rise downtown vs. low-density sprawl

5. Inverse social Geography– Rich on periphery– Poor in the center

Page 12: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 13: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 14: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 15: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 16: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 17: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 18: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

Contemporary Neighborhood types in American Central Cities

• 1: declining “ghetto complexes”

• 2: “new immigrant enclaves”

• 3: gentrified “core areas”

Page 19: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 20: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

1: Declining Ghetto Complexes

• A: These neighborhoods are products of historical and continued racial segregation, exhibiting African American populations of 90-100%.

• B: very steep and sustained population losses. – Ex. Washington Park neighborhood in Chicago lost almost

1/3 of it population between 1990 and 2000.

• C: job losses, capital flight, and diminishing local economic opportunity

• D: virtually no new foreign-born immigrants have settled in these neighborhoods

Page 21: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 22: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 23: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 24: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 25: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 26: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

2: The New Immigrant Enclaves

a. Very impressive population growth– 45% in Gage Park, average growth of 20%

b. Geographical expansion as well

c. Middle position in terms of quality of life indicators

d. Most of the “multi-ethnic” census tracts are found in these zones

Page 27: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 28: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

3: Gentrified “Core Area”

a. Moderate population gains*slight increase in areas where industry was converted to residential

use*slight decreases in traditionally residential neighborhoods being

subject to gentrification

b. Economic dynamismc. Rising incomes

*The Near North Side jumped from $43,000 to $92,000 between 1990 and 2000.

d. Dramatic gains in the value of real estate*In the Gold Coast, the value of real estate appreciated 9.4 times faster than the city average between 1991 and 1997.

Page 29: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 30: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 31: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 32: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 33: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 34: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 35: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 36: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.
Page 37: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

Urban Structure

• Three models of urban structure– Concentric zone model– Sector model– Multiple nuclei model– Geographic applications

• Use of the models outside North America– European cities– Less developed countries

Page 38: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

Concentric Zone Model

Fig. 13-5: In the concentric zone model, a city grows in a series of rings surrounding the CBD.

Page 39: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

Sector Model

Fig. 13-6: In the sector model, a city grows in a series of wedges or corridors extending out from the CBD.

Page 40: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

Multiple Nuclei Model

Fig. 13-7: The multiple nuclei model views a city as a collection of individual centers, around which different people and activities cluster.

Page 41: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

Indianapolis: Percent Renters

Fig. 13-8: The distribution of renters in Indianapolis illustrates the concentric zone model.

Page 42: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

Indianapolis: Household Income

Fig. 13-9: The distribution of high income households in Indianapolis is an example of a sector model.

Page 43: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

Indianapolis: Ethnic Patterns

Fig. 13-10: The distribution of minorities in Indianapolis is an example of a multiple nuclei model.

Page 44: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

Professionals in Glasgow

Fig. 13-11: Top professionals in Glasgow, Scotland, are more likely to live near the center of the city, in contrast to most U.S. cities.

Page 45: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

Mexico City

Fig. 13-12: The Aztec city of Tenochtitlán was built on an island in Lake Texcoco. Today poorer people live on a landfill in the former lakebed, and the elite live to the west.

Page 46: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

Fès (Fez), Morocco

Fig. 13-13: The old city has narrow winding streets and dense population. The French laid out a new district to the west with a geometric street pattern.

Page 47: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Fig. 13-14: In Ho Chi Minh City (formerly Saigon), the French demolished the previous city and replaced it with a colonial design with boulevards and public squares.

Page 48: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

Latin American City Model

Fig. 13-15: In many Latin American cities, the wealthy live in the inner city and in a sector extending along a commercial spine.

Page 49: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Fig. 13-16: High income households in Rio de Janeiro live in the CBD and in a spine along the ocean. Low-income households often live in peripheral areas.

Page 50: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

Inner Cities

• Inner-city physical problems– Deterioration process– Urban renewal

• Inner-city social problems– Underclass– Culture of poverty

• Inner-city economic problems– Annexation

Page 51: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

Dayton, Ohio, Inner City

Fig. 13-17: Drug-related arrests (left) have been concentrated in the inner-west side of the city. In the 2001 mayoral election, votes for Rhine McLin concentrated in the African-American section of the city.

Page 52: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

Growth of Chicago

Fig. 13-18: Chicago grew rapidly in the 19th century through annexation. In the 20th century the major annexation was for O’Hare Airport.

Page 53: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

Problems of Suburbs

• The peripheral model– Density gradient– Cost of suburban sprawl– Suburban segregation

• Transportation and suburbanization– Motor vehicles– Public transportation

• Local government fragmentation– Metropolitan government– Growing smart

Page 54: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

Peripheral Model of Urban Areas

Fig. 13-19: The central city is surrounded by a ring road, around which are suburban areas and edge cities, shopping malls, office parks, industrial areas, and service complexes.

Page 55: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

Cleveland, Ohio, 1900–1990

Fig. 13-20: The density gradient in Cleveland shows the expansion of dense population outward from the city center over time. In 1990, population dispersed over a wider area with less variation in density than before.

Page 56: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

Suburban Development in the U.S. and U.K.

Fig. 13-21: New housing in the U.K. is likely to be in planned new towns, while in the U.S. growth occurs in discontinuous developments.

Page 57: Chapter 13 Urban Patterns. Percent Urban Population Fig. 13-1: Percent of the population living in urban areas is usually higher in MDCs than in LDCs.

Public Transport in Brussels

Fig. 13-22: Brussels illustrates the integration of heavy rail and light rail in public transport.