Chapter 11 - Stress, Strain and Deformation in...
Transcript of Chapter 11 - Stress, Strain and Deformation in...
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 1
Chapter 8 - Stress, Strain and Deformation in SolidsFor a beam in bending, we are often interested in determining the transverse displacement along the beam as shown below.
To do that, we would start with Conservation of Linear Momentum. Unfortunately, COLM is in terms of stress, . Consequently, we must have some way to relate stress to deformation. We will need additional equations as follows:
Constitutive relations - relate stress to strain
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 2Kinematic relations - relate strain to displacement (gradients)
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 3In the study of the motion of a solid or fluid, we will find it necessary to describe the kinematic behavior of a continuum body by defining expressions called strains in terms of the gradients of displacement components. In the example below, we consider an elastic bar of length L. If the bar is subjected by an axial force F, it will stretch an amount as shown in figure b). The quantity /L is a measure of the change in length relative to the original length and is defined to be the axial strain for the bar.
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 4In figure d), a shear load is applied that is parallel to the top surface as shown. The angle measures the amount the original right angle in figure c) has changed from a right angle, and the angle is related to the shear strain.
What causes strain?
Mechanical loads (forces, pressures, etc.)
Temperature change (thermal expansion)
Moisture absorption ** Stress (relationship between stress and strain is the
constitutive relationship)
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 5In this chapter we will mathematically formalize these simple ideas to develop expressions for strains in terms of displacement components. We will consider two approaches:
1) mathematically precise approach and 2) a simpler geometrical approach.
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 6
Deformations in solids are characterized by displacements of points and by elongations and rotations of line segments in the solid.
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 7
Note the following geometry quantities:P moves to P*, Q moves to Q*, line segment P-Q deforms (stretches/rotates) to P*-Q*:
= position vector of point P (initial state)= position vector of point P (in deformed state)= displacement vector of point P (from initial to
deformed state)= vector line segment between P and Q (initial state)= vector line segment between P and Q (deformed
state) = displacement vector of point Q (from initial to
deformed state)
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 8
From geometry of the vectors, we can write two equations:
displacement vector of point P: and
or
The last two terms represent the change (gradient) in displacement with respect to position , i.e.,
displacement gradient matrix (3x3). Note: not
symmetric!
uux x uy x uz xux y uy y uz yux z uy z uz z
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 9
Definition of strain. Strain is a measure of the deformation and rotation of line segments. Consider two material elements & , which undergo deformations that will
bring them into new locations & ; respectively.
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 10
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 11
Previously, we obtained for a line segment :
We will obtain identical expressions for the two line segments and defined in the figure above:
and
Consider the dot product of these two vectors (a scaler result!)
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 12
Recall that is a 3x3 matrix. The “T” in means that the matrix is transposed. The underlined term is defined as so that and
Finite Strain TensorNote that the expression for the finite strain tensor
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 13
contains two distinctive terms:
linear in displacement gradients
quadratic in displacement gradients
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 14
Infinitesimal Strain Tensor
If the higher order terms are neglected from the finite strain tensor [E] (i.e., keep only linear displacement gradient terms), we obtain the infinitesimal strain tensor, []:
where [] is a 3x3 matrix given by:
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 15
Note: Both [E] and [] are symmetric matrices.
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 16
A 2-D geometrical look at (defined to be the change in length of a line segment dx which is originally oriented in the x direction) and undergoes displacements ux and uy:
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 17
= (change in length)/(original length) .
Note: (for small a). Thus, the last result is approximately:
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 18
The strain now becomes
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 19
After canceling the dx terms, the finite strain term becomes
finite strain
For small gradients, we assume that the squared terms are small compared to the un-squared terms and we obtain the linear, or small strain expression:
small strain
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 20
Shear strain (rotation of line segments):Note that
xy = . Geometrically, each of the two terms is
an angle as shown at the left. xy is called a shear strain and geometrically is 1/2 (average) of the angular rotation of line segments dx & dy which originally form a right angle. In
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 21
contrast, the engineering shear strain xy is defined as the sum
of these two angles, ie, xy = 2 xy = .
The definition of the engineering shear strain xy from a graphical viewpoint is an approximation (similar to the square root approximation made in xx ). From the geometry above,
. Define xy to be the sum of the
angular rotations, ie, xy = . (engineering shear strain)
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 22
As in the square root approximation made for xx (for the geometrical interpretation of strain), an assumption of “small” rotations has been made in defining the shear strain xy .
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 23
Some examplesConsider a bar of lenght L, fixed at the left end, and with a force P applied at the right end. The bar stretches an amount uL at the right end. If the “engineering” strain in the x direction is defined to be (change in length)/(original length), then xx = uL/L.
We could also find the expresssion for u(x) and apply the mathematical definition of xx . We have two boundary conditions on u(x): u(0)=0 and u(L)= uL. Assume
where C1 and C2 are constants. Applying B.C.s gives C1 = 0 and C2 = uL/L so that u(x) = (uL/L) x. Thus the
strain is given by = (uL/L).
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 24Example: At the point "A" shown on the wheel, the displacement field has been determined to be as follows (using the finite element method):
Determine the strains at point "A" which is located at x=4in, y=5in.
Point A
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 25
, Note:
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 26
Now, do again, but consider finite strain.
Comparing the two results, is it OK to assume small strains for this problem?
undeformed
deformed
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 27Some Thought Exercises
Suppose we have an 8x8 square area outlined on a larger chunk of planar material (like a plate). Suppose the plate is loaded in the x-y plane so that the square is displaced and deformed to a rectangle as shown below [new x-y coordinates starting at lower left corner and going CCW are: (8,4), (20,4), (20,12) and (8,12)]. Picture shows “deformed” and “undeformed” area. What are your guesses for the strains? There is stretching in the x direction, so . There is no stretching in the y direction, so . All right angles remain right angles, hence there is no shear strain and .
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 28We can actually solve for the displacements and strains since we know the initial and final positions of the 4 corner points. Assume that the displacements are given by (a 2-D curve fit):
Four constants are chosen because we know information at 4 points. Now apply know conditions for the four corner points:
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 29In each of the above, the displacement at a point is set equal to the “final position” – “initial position” of that point. Solve for the constants and substitute back into and to obtain:
Last equation says that displacement of all points in y direction () is a constant, which is consistent with the “picture” of
deformed and undeformed area. Now calculate the strains:
(a positive value indicates stretching)
(no stretching in y direction)
(no shear strain)
undeformed deformed
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 30Suppose we have an 8x8 square area outlined on a larger chunk of planar material (like a plate). Suppose the plate is loaded in the x-y plane so that the square is displaced and deformed to a parallelogram as shown below [new x-y coordinates starting at lower left corner and going CCW are: (8,4), (16,4), (19,12) and (11,12)]. Picture shows “deformed” and “undeformed” area. What are your guesses for the strains? There is no stretching in the x direction, so
. There is no stretching in the y direction, so . However, original right angles are no longer right angles, hence there is some shear strain and
.
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 31Suppose we have an 8x8 square area outlined on a larger chunk of planar material (like a plate). Suppose the plate is loaded in the x-y plane so that the square is displaced and deformed to a quadrilateral as shown below [new x-y coordinates starting at lower left corner and going CCW are: (9,4), (16.8,6), (17.5, 14.5) and (10.8,12.5)]. Picture shows “deformed” and “undeformed” area. What are your guesses for the strains? It appears that there is shortening or stretching in the x and y direction; hence, and
. Original right angles are no longer right angles, hence there is some shear strain and .
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 32
Note on Tensor Stress & Strain Transformation
For 2-D, Cauchy's formula provided the following relation:
(3.31)
The component of in the direction of the unit outward normal of a surface (or in x' direction is:
Substitute Cauchy's formula into the above, and write in both vector and matrix notation:
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 33
The expression gives the component of stress, , in the direction of the unit normal (or in the direction of
the x'-axis which makes an angle CCW from the x-axis).
Lets do both the vector and matrix operations to show that they are the same. First, Cauchy's formula is
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 34
Note . Now do the remaining vector operation for to obtain:
If we do this in matrix notion we obtain:
(5.3)
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 35
The above is called the stress transformation equation (see eq. 5.3 in the notes). The stress transformation transforms stresses from an (x,y) coordinate system to an (x',y') system where x' is rotated by an angle CCW from the x-axis.
We can similarly show that the strain transformation is given by:
The quantity is the component of strain in the direction of a unit normal . is often called the unit elongation in the direction (just as is the unit elongation in the or x-coordinate direction).
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 36
Notes: 1. Both and are second order tensors.
2. All second order tensors follow the same transformation form in transforming from (x,y,z) to another orthogonal coordinate system (x',y',z'), i.e.,
and
2001, W. E. Haisler Chapter 8: Stress, Strain and Deformation in Solids 37
3. The same transformation applies to moments of inertia of a cross-section A (which is also a second order tensor):
, ,
With respect to the x'-y' coordinate system at some angle , we have:
Can also get by applying the coordinate transformation to the x-y moments of inertia written as a matrix: ( is unit vector in x' direction):
, then