Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations
Transcript of Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations
![Page 1: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
CRIM 2130 Emergency Management Spring 2016
Chapter 10 – Mitigation
School of Criminology and Justice Studies University of Massachusetts Lowell
![Page 2: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Understand the general concepts and purposes behind mitigation
Know the types of structural mitigation actions that can be taken for various hazards
Explain the advantages and disadvantages of structural mitigation
List the different types of non‐structural mitigation that can be undertaken to reduce hazard losses
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of non‐structural mitigation
![Page 3: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Outline key steps that can be taken to conduct mitigation planning
Identify job and volunteer opportunities in the field of mitigation
Be sufficiently motivated to undertake mitigation steps in their own homes and workplaces
![Page 4: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
What is Mitigation? It is the efforts used to lessen the impact of a disaster
Mitigation can dramatically influence: Who lives or dies
Which buildings survive
Length and cost of recovery
Mitigation efforts can be broken down into: Structural
Non‐Structural
![Page 5: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
1966: Presidential Executive Order 11296
Required federal agencies to reduce floodplain development
1980: First FEMA interagency hazard mitigation teams created
1992: FEMA Administrator makes mitigation a top priority
2001: Priority refocus to preparedness and response (Why?)
2005: Mitigation concern renewed after Katrina (Why?)
![Page 6: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Centers on the built environment
Creating a “planned” environment that can resist area hazards appropriately Dams and levees
Retrofit in seismic areas
Tornado safe rooms
Sandbagging & elevating buildings
Blast resistant windows and concrete barriers
Goal is to reduce loss of life and injuries, as well as property damage
![Page 7: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in 2009 awarded the grade of "D" to our dams nation‐wide They define high hazard dams as those that would cause
considerable risk to life and property
Thousands of such locations exist across the U.S.
Bulk of the responsibility for maintenance and repair exists at the state government level
Estimates that billions of dollars annually would be needed for repairs
Similar grades were earned for bridges, ports, roads and other critical infrastructure
![Page 8: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Many communities also enact building codes Require developers, builders and homeowners to:
o Secure building and other permits o Go through inspections for completed work o Comply with the building and other codes
Such rules exist to increase public safety o At times, builders and developers fight them (added cost)
Examples: Hurricane clamps Elevations Underground utility lines
![Page 9: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Measured as a 7.0 event Far less powerful than the 8.8 earthquake that
rumbled through Chile the same year Approximately 800 people died in Chile More than 300,000 perished in Haiti Considerable differences between the two nations
Primary one is the ability to afford and enforce mitigation
Population density in areas close to the quake also made a difference Haiti earthquake struck a highly populated capitol city
![Page 10: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Many communities contain older structures that may not meet current building codes
May be possible to retrofit structures However, retrofitting can range from simple to very
expensive May be difficult due to interior modifications
![Page 11: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Part of the FEMA Disaster Recovery University (DRU) Initiative Conducted hazard identification and loss estimation for
various levels Focused on highest impact buildings and losses to the
university Concentrated funds to retrofit those buildings Should save the university and the larger community
considerably
![Page 12: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Advantages Reduces loss of life, injuries and damage Cost of rebuilding lessened People return home faster Insurance companies don’t have to raise rates Lessens psychological impact Even creates recreational opportunities
Disadvantages Cost No single protection is perfect May lead to a false sense of security
o People may not evacuate
![Page 13: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Advantages Reduces loss of life, injuries and damage Cost of rebuilding lessened People return home faster Insurance companies don’t have to raise rates Lessens psychological impact Even creates recreational opportunities
Disadvantages Cost No single protection is perfect May lead to false sense of security
o People may not evacuate
![Page 14: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
What is non-structural mitigation? The non‐built environment Land use planning Building codes and enforcement Public education Relocations Relocation ‐ Buyouts Insurance
![Page 15: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The non‐built environment Actions people take to reduce the impacts of area hazards Involves choices about: o How and where we build o How we manage land o How we reduce potential losses via personal and
collective actions
![Page 16: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Land use planning Future oriented activity; represents proactive behavior Involves two elements:
o Location – limit building in potentially hazardous areas o Design – determine most suitable design for structure
based on hazards First step is to link land use with mitigation planning
o Often the two efforts work separately
![Page 17: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Building codes and enforcement Conducted by city planning offices and code inspectors Influenced by:
o Residents o Builders o City officials
Can be contentious, as it often limits choices People often take greater interest in codes after a disaster
o Write new codes o Increase enforcement o May displace people
![Page 18: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Public education Many local and state governments conduct hazard
awareness events designed to catch your attention Communicating risk to the public and expecting them to
take the recommended actions can be challenging Most effective way is to transmit accurate information
through trusted networks o Local organizations o Faith‐based locations o Schools
Appealing to people’s altruistic nature can motivate them to pay attention to public education messages
![Page 19: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Relocation When repetitive losses occur, one option is permanent
relocation Advantages o People no longer lose their homes/livelihoods o Reduces future costs for governments and insurance
providers Disadvantages o Permanent move away from family and friends o People’s home are often tied to jobs (farms, fishing, etc.) o Places often have cultural, environmental and historical
value
![Page 20: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Relocation ‐ Buyouts Relocation may not be financially feasible o May mean loss of a significant economic investment
In cases where people need assistance to locate, government may offer a buyout o People agree to a fair market value for their property in
return for moving out of hazard area Federal government may offer up to 75% cost share with
state and local governments Properties may be used for parks or other open spaces
![Page 21: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Relocation ‐ Buyouts (Cont.) Relocating businesses can be challenging o Public facilities that must relocate can use funding from
multiple sources o Private firms must pay their own costs
Soldiers Grove, WI o Repetitive flood damage to downtown o Levees-$3.5M to build; $10K annual maintenance costs
Downtown properties valued at $1M o Cost to relocate town is $6M
![Page 22: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Insurance Provides a means to rebound from disasters However, many insurance policies do not cover flooding or
wind damage To make up for this, the U.S. govt. offers the National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP) o Policies cost about $500 per year (houses covered up to
$250K; contents up to $100K) o To be eligible, communities must adopt and enforce
floodplain building prohibitions (zoning/planning board and conservation commission)
o Policy holder must pay deductible
![Page 23: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Advantages Less costly than structural measures
o i.e. Pandemic reduction – washing hands Typically high return on investment
o Reduces loss of life, injuries and property loss
Disadvantages Requires attention to infrequent or unprecedented events
o People may ignore pre‐event advice Often relies on the individual, who may have limited
resources for mitigation o May not be able to afford insurance o Insurance may not cover all of or any portion of the even
![Page 24: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Initiated by FEMA Administrator James Lee Witt in 1997 subsequent to Hurricane Floyd (flooding)
Emphasizes non‐structural techniques Four-pronged program
Identify/recruit PI partners in the community, such as local government, civic/volunteer groups, businesses and citizens
Define community's risk and exposure to natural disasters Set priorities and target resources to reduce impact of
future disasters Keep the community informed and focused on PI's ability to
reduce damage and costs of future disasters.
![Page 25: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Outcome Built new partnerships that reduced risks Created a grass‐roots based solution to mitigation Not funded during the next administration as not “cost
effective”
FEMA has many programs that provide the same benefit as Project Impact did
![Page 26: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Damage caused by earthquakes, hurricanes, flooding or other events can result in enormous losses Impacts of terrorism at a major sporting event An explosion at a campus lab
Initial steps: Develop a mitigation planning team Identify hazards and reduce Prioritize action areas Implementation of mesures
![Page 27: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Saves lives and there are fewer injuries Less is property damage Minimizes economic disruption Lessens human impact Reduces agricultural damage Provides lifelines and infrastructure stabilized Helps with stress reduction and mental health Mitigates(?) legal liability
Source: FEMA, in Godschalk 1991
![Page 28: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Reduces post disaster pressure With a plan in place you know what to do With a plan in place, you have priorities
The planning process can bring people together and build partnerships
Allows a community to approach the problem(s) holistically, without the burden of post‐disaster crisis
Risk reduction requires ideas from all It’s a complex process Life safety! Property safeguarding!
Source: FEMA #1, Intro
![Page 29: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Source: FEMA 2002
Arnold, MO Example
Flood Year 1993 1995 2002
Sandbag sites 60 3 0
Public Assistance $1,436,277 $71,414 $0
Individual Assistance Applications 52 26 1
![Page 30: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Organize resources Interested members Technical expertise
Assess risks What are the hazards? What are the consequences?
Develop a mitigation plan What are your priorities?
Implement the plan and monitor progress
Source: FEMA #1, Foreward
![Page 31: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
State government Federal government Private sector Citizens Academic institutions A powerful champion (Who?) Link to other planning (What?)
Source: FEMA #1, 1-12
![Page 32: Chapter 10 Mitigation - University Relations](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022012301/61e246acc293b869d81a1c77/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Hold a kickoff meeting Set a regular schedule for meetings Assignments planning tasks based on skill sets Establish goals for the plan Use timelines and milestones Use available resources
FEMA U.S. Army Corps of Engineers State, local and regional emergency agencies Volunteer organizations, like the Red Cross