Chapter 1: Psychology and History
description
Transcript of Chapter 1: Psychology and History
![Page 1: Chapter 1: Psychology and History](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070504/568167e7550346895ddd546f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Chapter 1: Psychology and History
A History of Psychology (3rd Edition)
John G. Benjafield
![Page 2: Chapter 1: Psychology and History](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070504/568167e7550346895ddd546f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Studying the History of Psychology
• Why study the history of psychology? • Historiography: studying the history of
history
![Page 3: Chapter 1: Psychology and History](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070504/568167e7550346895ddd546f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Edwin G. Boring (1886–1968)
• Wrote the most influential modern history of psychology
• Focused on the growth of experimental psychology since the nineteenth century
– These developments should be considered in their historical context
![Page 4: Chapter 1: Psychology and History](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070504/568167e7550346895ddd546f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Edwin G. Boring
• Recognized two approaches to history:– Person: emphasizing the role of the individual– Zeitgeist: understanding the cultural context in
which the individual’s work took place• Concept attributed to Johann Wolfgang von
Goethe (1749–1832)
![Page 5: Chapter 1: Psychology and History](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070504/568167e7550346895ddd546f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Other Constructs
• Progressive: the historical world seen as movement to an end– Ex. Jacob’s ladder
• Cyclical: history seen as a circularity– Ex. Ixion’s wheel
• Maybe psychology both progresses and is cyclical? – Think of a spiral
![Page 6: Chapter 1: Psychology and History](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070504/568167e7550346895ddd546f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The New History of PsychologyLaurel Furomoto (1989: 11):
‘Whereas traditional history portrayed the scientist as an objective fact finder and neutral observer, the new history emphasized the notion that scientists often operate in a subjective fashion, under the influence of a variety of extra-scientific factors. Also, the new history rejected the traditional view of scientific activity as a continuous progression from error to truth, and opted instead for a model that depicts scientific change as a shift from one world view to another…’
![Page 7: Chapter 1: Psychology and History](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070504/568167e7550346895ddd546f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Thomas Kuhn (1924–1996)
• The Structure of Scientific Revolutions• Development of scientific disciplines is
discontinuous
![Page 8: Chapter 1: Psychology and History](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070504/568167e7550346895ddd546f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Thomas Kuhn
• Paradigm: the set of fundamental beliefs that guide workers in a scientific discipline
• Revolutionary period: occurs when a new paradigm is emerging and an old paradigm is being overthrown
• Paradigm clashes: fundamentally different ways of interpreting existing data
• Normal science: occurs once a discipline has established a single paradigm
![Page 9: Chapter 1: Psychology and History](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070504/568167e7550346895ddd546f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Psychology’s Paradigms?
• Has psychology ever had a paradigm?• Should psychology have a paradigm?
![Page 10: Chapter 1: Psychology and History](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070504/568167e7550346895ddd546f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Feminism and the Psychology of Women
Classic texts:• Simone de Beauvoir’s (1949/1989) The
Second Sex• Betty Friedan’s (1963) The Feminine
Mystique• Feminism ≠ a single point of view
![Page 11: Chapter 1: Psychology and History](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070504/568167e7550346895ddd546f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Feminism and the Psychology of Women
Feminism and the Women’s Movement have helped change the history of psychology
• Idenitified distortions and biases in psychology
• Changes to curriculum so we can study the psychology of women and the women of psychology– Compensatory history– Reconstruction of women’s experiences
![Page 12: Chapter 1: Psychology and History](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070504/568167e7550346895ddd546f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Two Traditions
Kimball: 1. Emphasizes the similarities between the
gendersex. Letta Hollingworth
2. Emphasizes feminine characteristicsex. Evelyn Fox Keller
![Page 13: Chapter 1: Psychology and History](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070504/568167e7550346895ddd546f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Evelyn Fox Keller
Keller Noticed: 1. The relative absence of women in the
sciences2. That the style of thinking practised by
scientists had a masculine origin
![Page 14: Chapter 1: Psychology and History](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070504/568167e7550346895ddd546f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Evelyn Fox Keller
Need to be aware of the science-gender system:
• ≠ ignore masculine science• = discuss feminine science as well as
masculine science
![Page 15: Chapter 1: Psychology and History](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070504/568167e7550346895ddd546f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Social Constructionism
• Is psychology a social construction? • Dialectical process: one in which opposing
tendencies shape one another– Exogenic: coming from outside– Endogenic: coming from inside
• Limits to both exogenic and endogenic perspectives– Avoid problem by understanding
psychological concepts as the outcome of social processes
![Page 16: Chapter 1: Psychology and History](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070504/568167e7550346895ddd546f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Psychological Research as a Social Construction
• Concern:– Psychology as a social construction suggests
psychological research is not objective• However:
– Can scientific research be both a social construction and the objective truth?
![Page 17: Chapter 1: Psychology and History](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070504/568167e7550346895ddd546f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Psychological Researchas a Social Construction
Some social-constructionist historians:• Focus on the social processes that
determine how research is conducted • Avoid claiming a lack of empirical content• Ex. Kurt Danziger
![Page 18: Chapter 1: Psychology and History](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070504/568167e7550346895ddd546f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Reconciling the ‘Old’ and ‘New’Histories of Psychology
• Presentism: the tendency to evaluate the past primarily in terms of its relevance for the present– George W. Stocking– Herbert Butterfield
![Page 19: Chapter 1: Psychology and History](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070504/568167e7550346895ddd546f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Reconciling the ‘Old’ and ‘New’Histories of Psychology
• Historicism: the understanding of the past for its own sake
• Passéist: a person who values the past more than the present
• An historicist need not be a passéist
![Page 20: Chapter 1: Psychology and History](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070504/568167e7550346895ddd546f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Precautions when Studying the History of Psychology
• History not important simply because it lays the groundwork for what we have now
• We should not regard all previous thinkers as obsolete
• We should guard against the danger of being too critical of the past
![Page 21: Chapter 1: Psychology and History](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070504/568167e7550346895ddd546f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
When studying the history of psychology….
• Try to rediscover what each psychologist was attempting to accomplish
• Try to understand each theory on its own terms