CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED

21
CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED P. JANICKE 2011

description

CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED. P. JANICKE 2011. SCOPE OF CROSS. FED. RULE 611(b): GENERALLY LIMITED TO SCOPE OF DIRECT + ISSUES OF WIT. CREDIBILITY COURT CAN ALLOW WIDER SCOPE OFTEN DOES, TO SAVE TIME OF RECALLING THE WITNESS TEXAS: NO LIMIT ON SCOPE OF CROSS TEX. R. 611(b). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED

Page 1: CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED

CHAP. 7 :DIRECT AND CROSS

REVISITED

P. JANICKE2011

Page 2: CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED

2011 Chap. 7 -- More On Direct and Cross

2

SCOPE OF CROSS

• FED. RULE 611(b): GENERALLY LIMITED TO SCOPE OF DIRECT + ISSUES OF WIT. CREDIBILITY

• COURT CAN ALLOW WIDER SCOPE– OFTEN DOES, TO SAVE TIME OF

RECALLING THE WITNESS• TEXAS: NO LIMIT ON SCOPE OF

CROSS TEX. R. 611(b)

Page 3: CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED

2011 Chap. 7 -- More On Direct and Cross

3

LEADING ON DIRECT

• ALLOWED SOMETIMES – – TIMID WITNESS– MOMENTARY MEMORY LAPSE– ADVERSE WITNESS (ASSOCIATED

WITH OTHER SIDE)

Page 4: CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED

2011 Chap. 7 -- More On Direct and Cross

4

• ALSO ALLOWED ON “PRELIMINARY MATTERS”

• BUT YOU HAVE TO KNOW THE LOCAL PRACTICE

• STRICT RULE: ONLY NAME, ADDRESS, OCCUPATION, AND PLACEMENT AT THE SCENE ARE PRELIMINARY

Page 5: CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED

2011 Chap. 7 -- More On Direct and Cross

5

• IN HARRIS COUNTY STATE COURTS, ALL FOUNDATION QUESTIONS ARE REGARDED AS PRELIMINARY

• EXAMPLES :– AUTHENTICITY OF A DOCUMENT– FAMILIARITY WITH A PERSON’S

CHARACTER OR REPUTATION

Page 6: CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED

2011 Chap. 7 -- More On Direct and Cross

6

MEMORY REFRESHING IS ALLOWED

• IN LIEU OF LEADING, ANY REASONABLE MEMORY REFRESHMENT TECHNIQUE IS OK– LOOKING AT A REPORT– CHECKING A BOOK– REVIEWING NOTES

• THESE ARE NOT PUTTING THE DOCUMENTS INTO EVIDENCE!

Page 7: CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED

2011 Chap. 7 -- More On Direct and Cross

7

• OTHER SIDE IS ALLOWED TO SEE THE REFRESHMENT MATERIAL

Page 8: CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED

2011 Chap. 7 -- More On Direct and Cross

8

LEADING ON CROSS

• BROADLY ALLOWED

• EXCEPTION: YOUR OWN CLIENT

Page 9: CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED

2011 Chap. 7 -- More On Direct and Cross

9

WITNESS PREP. MATERIALRULE 612

• ADVERSE PARTY HAS RIGHT TO SEE IT IF USED WHILE ON THE STAND

• FED. RULE: MAY GET ORDER TO SEE IT IF USED BEFORE TRIAL– ROUTINELY GRANTED TODAY

Page 10: CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED

2011 Chap. 7 -- More On Direct and Cross

10

TEXAS RULE 612• USED WHILE ON THE STAND:

ADVERSARY HAS RIGHT TO INSPECT AND TO INTRODUCE PARTS PERTINENT TO TESTIMONY

• RE. MATERIAL VIEWED PRE-TRIAL:– CRIMINAL CASES: SAME AS USE ON

THE STAND– CIVIL CASES: NEED ORDER, BUT EASY

TO GET IN PRACTICE

Page 11: CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED

2011 Chap. 7 -- More On Direct and Cross

11

WORK-PRODUCT CONTENTION WILL NOT

OVERRIDE THE FOREGOING

• LAWYER-PREPARED MATERIALS SEEN BY WITNESS:– WILL HAVE TO BE HANDED OVER

– WORK-PRODUCT IS FLIMSY EVEN IF NOT SHOWN TO WITNESS! [EXPLAIN]

Page 12: CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED

2011 Chap. 7 -- More On Direct and Cross

12

CROSS-EXAM IS AN IMPORTANT RIGHT

• IF WITNESS FLEES, OR REFUSES TO COMPLETE CROSS, THE DIRECT WILL BE STRICKEN ON MOTION

Page 13: CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED

2011 Chap. 7 -- More On Direct and Cross

13

INVOKING “THE RULE”(FED. RULE 615/TEXAS RULE 614)

• RULE SEPARATING WITNESSES SO THEY CAN’T HEAR EACH OTHER’S TESTIMONY

• THE RULE IS MANDATORY ON REQUEST OF ANY PARTY

• CUSTOM IS TO MAKE THE REQUEST

Page 14: CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED

2011 Chap. 7 -- More On Direct and Cross

14

SOME WITNESSES ARE EXEMPT, i.e., CAN STAY IN

COURTROOM

• INDIVIDUAL PARTIES• ONE CORPORATE WITNESS CAN

STAY FOR EACH CORPORATE PARTY

• PERSONS SHOWN TO BE “NECESSARY” TO PRESENTATION OF THE CASE – USUALLY EXPERTS

Page 15: CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED

2011 Chap. 7 -- More On Direct and Cross

15

• PERSONS EXEMPTED BY STATUTE

– THERE IS SUCH A STATUTE >>>

Page 16: CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED

2011 Chap. 7 -- More On Direct and Cross

16

STATUTORY EXEMPTIONS FROM “THE RULE”

• FEDERAL: VICTIMS’ RIGHTS ACT 18 USC 3771

– COURT HAS DISCRETION TO EXEMPT VICTIM FROM THE RULE

– ALSO RELATIVES OF AN UNDER-18 OR DECEASED VICTIM

Page 17: CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED

2011 Chap. 7 -- More On Direct and Cross

17

TEXAS

• “THE RULE” [614] EXEMPTS VICTIMS IN CRIMINAL CASES, UNLESS JUDGE FINDS PRESENCE WOULD MATERIALLY AFFECT THEIR TESTIMONY

>>>

Page 18: CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED

2011 Chap. 7 -- More On Direct and Cross

18

• TEXAS: CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ART. 36.03

– EXEMPTS VICTIMS, UNLESS THEIR PRESENCE WOULD MATERIALLY AFFECT THEIR TESTIMONY

– ALSO EXEMPTS CLOSE RELATIVES OF DECEASED VICTIM, AND A GUARDIAN [PARENT NOT MENTIONED]

Page 19: CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED

2011 Chap. 7 -- More On Direct and Cross

19

DISCRETIONARY EXPANSION OF THE RULE

• PRETRIAL ORDER NOT TO DISCUSS EXPECTED TESTIMONY WITH OTHER WITNESSES – ALSO BINDS LAWYERS NOT TO INFORM RE.

WHAT OTHER WITNESSES SAY• NORMALLY ISSUED ONLY TO FACT

WITNESSES• COULD ALSO ISSUE TO EXPERTS

Page 20: CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED

2011 Chap. 7 -- More On Direct and Cross

20

TEXAS STATUTORY EXPANSION OF THE RULE

• TEXAS CRIMINAL CASES:– COURT MUST INSTRUCT WITNESSES

RE. WHOM THEY CAN TALK TO ABOUT THE CASE DURING TRIAL, AND WHO NOT TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ART. 36.03(e)

Page 21: CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED

2011 Chap. 7 -- More On Direct and Cross

21

READING TRANSCRIPT OF OTHER WIT.’S TESTIMONY

• FORBIDDEN BY COURT ORDER IN SOME JURISDICTIONS; NOT IN OTHERS, UNLESS COURT HAS SPECIFIED IN AN ORDER

• PENALTY FOR BREACH: – DISCRETIONARY – CAN STRIKE THE

OFFENDING WITNESS’S TESTIMONY