Chap 10 (Strat Systems)

download Chap 10 (Strat Systems)

of 20

Transcript of Chap 10 (Strat Systems)

  • 8/8/2019 Chap 10 (Strat Systems)

    1/20

    Chapter 10

    Comparing Systems of

    Stratification

  • 8/8/2019 Chap 10 (Strat Systems)

    2/20

    Hunting and Gathering

    Societies (most common form

    of Simple Society) Death was the major fact of life.

    Experienced chronic famines and onlyoccasional feasts.

    Stratified? Not much in terms of $

    Primary bases of stratification were age

    and sex Small, poor, threatened societies = little

    stratification

  • 8/8/2019 Chap 10 (Strat Systems)

    3/20

    Agrarian Societies live by

    farming

    Agriculture = more permanency,construct better shelters

    Agriculture = surplus food production(producing more than you needyourself)

    The capacity for labor to producesurplus was the basis for inequalities.

  • 8/8/2019 Chap 10 (Strat Systems)

    4/20

    Surplus = Stratification Why?

    Someone owns field

    Surplus = specialization andurbanization freed up others to think,

    invent, cure illness, etc. division of labor = power and status

    differences

    By owning another person one can ownthe surplus the other person produces.

  • 8/8/2019 Chap 10 (Strat Systems)

    5/20

    Surplus = Stratification

    (continued)

    Surplus supports a military, which iscontrolled by those in power

    Specialization = training and weaponsgreater ability to exploit

    Haves educate themselves time to

    study heavens, compose poems, etc. Cultural wall prevents upward mobility

  • 8/8/2019 Chap 10 (Strat Systems)

    6/20

    Industrial Societies = Less

    Stratification Greater productivity shouldproduce greater

    stratification, right?

    Certainly this is what Marx predicted

    But, industrialization = increase in level ofskill/training require

    Less replaceable

    Less replaceability = greater power

    Industrialization forced upward mobility

    Industrialization = decline in influence ofascription (in theory, societies can affordeducation for all)

  • 8/8/2019 Chap 10 (Strat Systems)

    7/20

    Correlations between Stratification

    and IndustrializationCorrelations with % of

    total national income

    going to richest 10% of

    familiesLevel of economic development -.61

    TV sets per 1,000 population -.65

    Per capita gross domestic product -.64

    Telephones per 1,000 population -.66Average life expectancy -.56

  • 8/8/2019 Chap 10 (Strat Systems)

    8/20

    Social Class in the US Slightly more inequality in the US than

    in other industrialized countries

    Median household (people in a housing

    unit) = $43K Median family of 4 income = about

    $51K

    $95K = 80th percentile, $165K = 95th

    percentile Who is rich? everything relative, I guess

    Classes? Upper, middle, working, lower

  • 8/8/2019 Chap 10 (Strat Systems)

    9/20

    Wealth = all money and assets

    minus debt Richest 20% control 84% of wealth richest

    1% control 40% of wealth

    Poorest 40% have no wealth (assets = debt)

    Differences in income in America are toolarge? (GSS question)

    SA = 27%, A = 34%, NeitherA orD = 20%, D

    = 9%, SD

    = 3% Answer to this question important implicationsminimum wage, tax structure, opinions on CEOsalaries, etc.

  • 8/8/2019 Chap 10 (Strat Systems)

    10/20

    While industrialization resulted in

    less inequality (think about last

    100-150 years), last 30 years hasseen increase in inequality

  • 8/8/2019 Chap 10 (Strat Systems)

    11/20

  • 8/8/2019 Chap 10 (Strat Systems)

    12/20

    Mobility in the United States

    Freedom American Dream Hard workcan turn anyone into anything he/she wants True?

    Mobility patterns in US similar to otherindustrialized (Lipset and Bendix study inbook) Some evidence that big jumps more common in

    US

    R

    ace and class matter less than they used to,but they still matter Important we dont forget this remember lobster

    lunch

  • 8/8/2019 Chap 10 (Strat Systems)

    13/20

    Status Attainment Model (Blau and

    Duncan)

    Strategy for studying intergenerationalmobility developed in 1960s

    Original study conducted by US CensusBureau

    Main finding from original study

    Status of fathers occupation is correlated withstatus of sons but not as much as peoplethought (r = .4)

    Fathers status affects sons through education

  • 8/8/2019 Chap 10 (Strat Systems)

    14/20

    Education the key

    Should rich and poor have equalaccess?

    Do rich and poor have equal access? Debate in Malibu schools

    Will $ save the day? (Video)

    Not likely but not a bad place to start Home situation still a powerful predictor of

    school success

  • 8/8/2019 Chap 10 (Strat Systems)

    15/20

    Poverty in the US

    Poverty rate up in past 3 years 12.5% in 2003 (was11.5 % in 2001)

    Poverty line = 3 times annual food bill About $18,500

    Blame the poor or blame society? Working poor are common

    Minimum wage = $5.15 (has not risen in 8 years)

    D

    o the math? What can we learn from talking to homeless?

    Stereotypes dont work

    1/3 drugs and alcohol, 1/3 mentally ill

  • 8/8/2019 Chap 10 (Strat Systems)

    16/20

    Interesting studies from Chap 10 Blau and Duncan status attainment research led to many

    studies conclusions Considerable upward mobility Cohen and Tyree found that 2/3 of poor children (lower 20%)

    end up in top 40% Marital status

    Education key and upper class have educationaladvantage

    Mare and Tzeng advantage to kids if parents older Age of father correlates with education and occupational

    prestige Effects remains even if we control for ed, $, occupation

    Older parents more mature, better parents? Porter: Replication of Blau and Duncan in Canada

    Remarkably, correlation between fathers occupationalprestige and sons = .4

    Correlation between sons education and sons occupationalprestige = .6

  • 8/8/2019 Chap 10 (Strat Systems)

    17/20

    Summary ofChap 9 and 10

    People vary in their degree of property($), power, prestige (status) (Webers3Ps)

    Strat inevitable partly because strat isfunctional some positions are moreimportant, less replaceable

    But conflict theory also important People will tend to act in self interest

    leads to exploitation, increasing inequality

    Will tendto this does not mean that youand I have to always act in self interest

  • 8/8/2019 Chap 10 (Strat Systems)

    18/20

    Conclusions continued

    Simple societies, agrarian, industrialized

    Ascription (race, class, gender) related

    to life chances, but less so inindustrialized societies Throughout much of human history,

    ascription THE determinant (caste)

    Correlation between fathers occupationalstatus and sons about .4 in US andCanada

  • 8/8/2019 Chap 10 (Strat Systems)

    19/20

    What will the world do to you?

    Perrin opinions no extra charge Marxism cannot work because.

    Strat is functional replaceability does explainstrat

    People will not work as hard for the common good

    as they will for themselves Gov = power tendto use power in self interest

    But Capitalism is not without its ownproblems We live in a world where, to some degree, we are

    judged by how much we produce, how much wemake

    We are also encouraged to look out for #1? Marx warned of what Capitalism does to

    interpersonal relationships

  • 8/8/2019 Chap 10 (Strat Systems)

    20/20

    World divided into 2 kinds of

    people? Those who return their shopping carts, those

    who do not? Those who take advantage of the weaker (or

    younger or poorer or) and those whodefend the weaker (or.) Jacob story

    Arthur Miller play, All My Sons If a man like that could do a thing like that then

    anyone capable of doing anything? Power in the example of Jesus love your

    neighbor as yourself Go see Motorcycle Diaries