Channel Modelling –ETI 085 Contents 2 · 2009. 10. 28. · 2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson -ETI 085...
Transcript of Channel Modelling –ETI 085 Contents 2 · 2009. 10. 28. · 2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson -ETI 085...
![Page 1: Channel Modelling –ETI 085 Contents 2 · 2009. 10. 28. · 2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson -ETI 085 6 Small-scale fading TwowavesTwo waves Wave 1 Wave 1 + Wave 2 W2Wave 2 2009-10-29](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071412/610a1880edf2c618f1381daf/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Channel Modelling – ETI 085gLecture no: 22
Statistical description of theStatistical description of the wireless channel
Fredrik TufvessonDepartment of Electrical and Information Technology
Lund University, [email protected]
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 1
Contents
• Why statistical description• Small scale fading
– without dominant componentith d i t t– with dominant component
• Doppler effectsT l d i ti• Temporal description
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 2
Why statistical description
• Unknown environment• Complicated environment• Can not describe everything in detail• Large fluctuations
• Need a statistical measure since we can not describe every point everywhere
“There is a x% probability that the amplitude/power will be b h l l ”above the level y”
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 3
What is large scale and small scale?
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 4
![Page 2: Channel Modelling –ETI 085 Contents 2 · 2009. 10. 28. · 2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson -ETI 085 6 Small-scale fading TwowavesTwo waves Wave 1 Wave 1 + Wave 2 W2Wave 2 2009-10-29](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071412/610a1880edf2c618f1381daf/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The WSSUS modelAssumptionsAssumptions
A very common wide-band channel model is the WSSUS-modelA very common wide band channel model is the WSSUS model.
Recalling that the channel is composed of a number of differentcontributions (incoming waves) the following is assumed:contributions (incoming waves), the following is assumed:
The channel is Wide-Sense Stationary (WSS), meaningth t th ti l ti f th h l i i i t tithat the time correlation of the channel is invariant over time.(Contributions with different Doppler frequency areuncorrelated.)
The channel is built up by Uncorrelated Scatterers (US),meaning that the frequency correlation of the channels isinvariant over frequency. (Contributions with different delaysare uncorrelated.)
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 5
Small-scale fadingTwo wavesTwo waves
Wave 1ERX1(t)=A1 cos(2πfct-2π/λ*d1)
k0=2π/λk0=2π/λE=E1 exp(-jkod1)
ETX(t)=A cos(2πfct)
W 2
ERX2(t)=A2 cos(2πfct-2π/λ*d2)E=E2 exp(-jkod2) E1
E2
Wave 2
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 6
Small-scale fadingTwo wavesTwo waves
Wave 1
Wave 1 + Wave 2
W 2Wave 2
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 7
Small-scale fadingDoppler shiftsDoppler shifts
rvθ Frequency of received signal:
cθ
0f f ν= +
where the doppler shift is
( )0 cosrvfc
ν θ= −
where the doppler shift isReceiving antenna moves withspeed vr at an angle θ relative
cto the propagation directionof the incoming wave, whichhas frequency f0.
The maximal Doppler shift isq y 0
max 0vfc
ν =
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 8
![Page 3: Channel Modelling –ETI 085 Contents 2 · 2009. 10. 28. · 2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson -ETI 085 6 Small-scale fading TwowavesTwo waves Wave 1 Wave 1 + Wave 2 W2Wave 2 2009-10-29](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071412/610a1880edf2c618f1381daf/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Small-scale fadingDoppler shiftsDoppler shifts
How large is the maximum Doppler frequency at pedestrian speeds for 5.2 GHz WLAN and at highway speeds using GSM 900?
max 0vfc
ν =
• f0=5.2 109 Hz, v=5 km/h, (1.4 m/s) 24 Hzf =900 106 Hz v=110 km/h (30 6 m/s) 92 Hz• f0=900 106 Hz, v=110 km/h, (30.6 m/s) 92 Hz
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 9
Small-scale fadingTwo waves with DopplerTwo waves with Doppler
Wave 1
v0 1 1
0
1exp( cos( ) )cvE E jk d f tc
θ= − −
ETX(t)=A cos(2πfct) v
0 2 20
2exp( cos( ) )cvE E jk d f tc
θ= − −
W 2
E1E2
Wave 2
The two components have different Doppler shifts!The Doppler shifts will cause a random frequency modulation
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 10
The Doppler shifts will cause a random frequency modulation
Small-scale fadingMany incoming wavesMany incoming waves
Many incoming waves with Add them up as phasorsindependent amplitudes
and phases
1 1,r φ 2 2,r φ
r2r 2φ
3φ
φ
4 4,r φ
1r1φ3r
r
φ
3 3,r φ4 4,φ
,r φ 4r4φ
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4exp exp exp exp expr j r j r j r j r jφ φ φ φ φ= + + +
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 11
Small-scale fadingMany incoming wavesMany incoming waves
Re and Im components aree a d co po e ts a esums of many independentequally distributed components
r2r 2φ
3φ
φ
2Re( ) (0, )r N σ∈1r
1φ3r
r
φRe(r) and Im(r) are independent
4r4φThe phase of r has a uniform distribution
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 12
![Page 4: Channel Modelling –ETI 085 Contents 2 · 2009. 10. 28. · 2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson -ETI 085 6 Small-scale fading TwowavesTwo waves Wave 1 Wave 1 + Wave 2 W2Wave 2 2009-10-29](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071412/610a1880edf2c618f1381daf/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Small-scale fadingRayleigh fadingRayleigh fading
No dominant component TX RXX(no line-of-sight)
2D GaussianTap distribution Amplitude distribution
2D Gaussian(zero mean) Rayleigh
0.8
0.4
0.6
r a=( )Im a ( )Re a
0 1 2 30
0.2
( )2
2 2exp2
r rpdf rσ σ
⎛ ⎞= −⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠No line-of-sight
component
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 13
σ σ⎝ ⎠component
Small-scale fadingRayleigh fadingRayleigh fading
Rayleigh distribution
( )2
2 2expr rpdf r⎛ ⎞
= −⎜ ⎟( ) 2 2exp2
pdf rσ σ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
minr0 r2rmsr σ=
⎛ ⎞
Probability that the amplitudeis below some threshold rmin:
( ) ( )min 2
minmin 2
0
Pr 1 expr
rms
rr r pdf r drr
⎛ ⎞< = = − −⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠∫
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 14
0 rms⎝ ⎠
Small-scale fadingRayleigh fading – outage probabilityRayleigh fading outage probability
• What is the probability that we will receive an amplitude 20 dB b l th ?dB below the rrms?
( )2
mini 2Pr 1 exp 1 exp( 0.01) 0.01rr r
⎛ ⎞< = − − = − − ≈⎜ ⎟( )min 2Pr 1 exp 1 exp( 0.01) 0.01
rms
r rr
< ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
• What is the probability that we will receive an amplitude below rrms?
( )2
minmin 2Pr 1 exp 1 exp( 1) 0.63
rms
rr rr
⎛ ⎞< = − − = − − ≈⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 15
Small-scale fadingRayleigh fading – fading marginRayleigh fading fading margin• To Ensure that we in most cases receive enough power we
transmit extra power fading margintransmit extra power – fading margin
22
2min
rmsrMr
=2r⎛ ⎞
| 10 2min
10 log rmsdB
rMr
⎛ ⎞= ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
minr0 r2rmsr σ=
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 16
![Page 5: Channel Modelling –ETI 085 Contents 2 · 2009. 10. 28. · 2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson -ETI 085 6 Small-scale fading TwowavesTwo waves Wave 1 Wave 1 + Wave 2 W2Wave 2 2009-10-29](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071412/610a1880edf2c618f1381daf/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Small-scale fadingRayleigh fading – fading marginRayleigh fading – fading margin
How many dB fading margin against Rayleigh fading do we need toHow many dB fading margin, against Rayleigh fading, do we need toobtain an outage probability of 1%?
( )2
minP 1 r⎛ ⎞⎜ ⎟ 1% 0 01( ) min
min 2Pr 1 exprms
r rr
< = − −⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
1% 0.01= =
Some manipulation gives2
min21 0.01 exp r⎛ ⎞
− = −⎜ ⎟ ( )2
min2ln 0.99 r
⇒ = −2prmsr
⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
( ) 2rmsr
( )2
min l 0 99 0 01r 2
1/ 0 01 100rmsrM( )min2 ln 0.99 0.01
rmsr⇒ = − = 2
min
1/ 0.01 100rmsMr
⇒ = = =
20M⇒ =
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 17
| 20dBM⇒ =
Small-scale fadingRayleigh fading – signal and interferenceRayleigh fading signal and interference• Both the desired signal and the
interference undergo fading 0.5interference undergo fading• For a single user inteferer and
Rayleigh fading: 0.35
0.4
0.45
2
2 2 2
2( )( )
SIRrpdf rr
σ
σ=
+0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
2
2 2( ) 1
( )SIR
rcdf rr
σ
σ= −
+-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 200
0.05
0.1
0.15
• where is the mean signal 22 22
σσσ
=
SIR(dB)
pdf for 10 dB mean signal to interference ratio
to interference radio1σ
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 18
Small-scale fadingRayleigh fading – signal and interferenceRayleigh fading signal and interference• What is the probability that the instantaneous SIR will be below 0 dB
if the mean SIR is 10 dB when both the desired signal and theif the mean SIR is 10 dB when both the desired signal and the interferer experience Rayleigh fading?
210( ) min
min 2 2min
10Pr 1 1 0.09(10 1)( )
rr rr
σ
σ< = − = − ≈
++
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 19
Small-scale fadingone dominating componentone dominating componentIn case of Line-of-Sight (LOS) one component dominates.
A it i li d ith th l i• Assume it is aligned with the real axis2Re( ) ( , )r N A σ∈ 2Im( ) (0, )r N σ∈
• The recieved amplitude has now a Ricean distribution instead of a Rayleigh– The fluctuations are smaller– The phase is dominated by the LOS component– In real cases the mean propagation loss is often smaller due p p g
to the LOS• The ratio between the power of the LOS component and
the diffuse components is called Ricean K-factorthe diffuse components is called Ricean K-factor2
2
Power in LOS componentPower in random components 2
Akσ
= =
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 20
![Page 6: Channel Modelling –ETI 085 Contents 2 · 2009. 10. 28. · 2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson -ETI 085 6 Small-scale fading TwowavesTwo waves Wave 1 Wave 1 + Wave 2 W2Wave 2 2009-10-29](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071412/610a1880edf2c618f1381daf/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Small-scale fadingRice fadingRice fading
A dominant component(line of sight) TX RX(line of sight)
2D Gaussian(non-zero mean)
Tap distribution Amplitude distribution
Rice( )
A
1.5
2
2.5k = 30
k = 10
r α=0.5
1 k = 0( )Im a ( )Re a
0 1 2 30
Line-of-sight (LOS)component with
amplitude A.
( )2 2
02 2 2exp2
r r A rApdf r Iσ σ σ
⎛ ⎞+ ⎛ ⎞= −⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 21
p
Small-scale fadingRice fading phase distributionRice fading, phase distribution
The distribution of the phase is dependent on p pthe K-factor
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 22
Small-scale fadingNakagami distributionNakagami distribution• In many cases the received signal can not be described as a pure
LOS + diffuse componentsLOS + diffuse components• The Nakagami distribution is often used in such cases
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30
0.2
0.4
signal amplitude
increasing m
with m it is possible to adjust the dominating power
g{1 2 3 4 5}
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 23
Some special cases
• Rayleigh fading2⎛ ⎞( )2
2 2exp2
r rpdf rσ σ
⎛ ⎞= −⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠• Rice fading, K=0
Rice fading with K=0 becomes Rayleigh
• Nakagami, m=1
N k i ith 1 b R l i h
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 24
Nakagami with m=1 becomes Rayleigh
![Page 7: Channel Modelling –ETI 085 Contents 2 · 2009. 10. 28. · 2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson -ETI 085 6 Small-scale fading TwowavesTwo waves Wave 1 Wave 1 + Wave 2 W2Wave 2 2009-10-29](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071412/610a1880edf2c618f1381daf/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Measurement example
• Measurement in the lab• Center frequency 3.2 GHz• Measurement bandwidth 200 MHz, 201 frequency points• 60 measurement positions, spaced 1 cm apart• Measured with a vector network analyzer
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 25
Transfer function
-35
-45
-40
-55
-50
p (d
B)
70
-65
-60
eque
ncy
res
-80
-75
-70
Fre
0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 1 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8 2-90
-85
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 26
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
x 108Frequency (Hz)
Transfer function, all positions
40
60
-50
-40
esp
(dB
)
80
-70
-60
Freq
uenc
y re
1 52
-90
-80F
0
0.2
0.4
00.5
1
1.5
x 108
( )Frequency (Hz)
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 27
0Position (m)Frequency (Hz)
Impulse response
-50
-60
-80
-70
p (d
B)
-90
Impu
lse
resp
110
-100
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5-120
-110
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 28
x 10-7Delay (s)
![Page 8: Channel Modelling –ETI 085 Contents 2 · 2009. 10. 28. · 2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson -ETI 085 6 Small-scale fading TwowavesTwo waves Wave 1 Wave 1 + Wave 2 W2Wave 2 2009-10-29](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071412/610a1880edf2c618f1381daf/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Impulse response, all positions
-60
-40
)
-80
-60
se re
sp (d
B)
0
0.2
-100 Positi
Impu
ls
0.4
0.6
00.5
11.5
2
-120
on (m)
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 29
2
x 10-7 Delay (s)
Probability density function
180 d
140
160measuredtheoretical
100
120
80
100
40
60
0 0 002 0 004 0 006 0 008 0 01 0 0120
20
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 30
0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.012amplitude
Cumulative distribution function
1
0.8
0.9measuredtheoretical
0.6
0.7
0.4
0.5cdf
0.2
0.3
0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.0120
0.1
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 31
amplitude
Small-scale fadingDoppler spectraDoppler spectra
Wave 1
v0 1 1
0
1exp( cos( ) )cvE E jk d f tc
θ= − −
ETX(t)=A cos(2πfct) v
0 2 20
2exp( cos( ) )cvE E jk d f tc
θ= − −
W 2
E1E2
Wave 2
The two components have different Doppler shifts!The Doppler shifts will cause a random frequency modulation
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 32
The Doppler shifts will cause a random frequency modulation
![Page 9: Channel Modelling –ETI 085 Contents 2 · 2009. 10. 28. · 2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson -ETI 085 6 Small-scale fading TwowavesTwo waves Wave 1 Wave 1 + Wave 2 W2Wave 2 2009-10-29](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071412/610a1880edf2c618f1381daf/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Small-scale fadingDoppler spectrumDoppler spectrum
Incoming waves from several directionsSpectrum of received signal
when a f0 Hz signal is transmitted.
Incoming waves from several directions(relative to movement or RX)
RX movement
11
2
2
3 4
RX 4
3
0 maxf ν− 0 maxf ν+0fAll waves of equal strength inthis example, for simplicity.
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 33
Small-scale fadingDoppler spectrumDoppler spectrum
Isotropic uncorrelatedscattering
Time correlaion
1RX movement
0.5
1
RX
0
U if i iU l t d
0 0.5 1 1.5 2-0.5
max tν ΔUniform incomingpower distribution
(isotropic)
Uncorrelatedamplitudesand phases
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 34
Small-scale fadingDoppler spectrumDoppler spectrum• Time correlation – how static is the channel?
F if tt i i t th ti l ti f th R• For a uniform scattering environment the time correlation of the Re-and Im-components is described by a “zeroth-order Bessel function of the first kind”
1
Th ti l ti f th lit d i
( ) ( ) ( ){ } ( )*0 max2t E a t a t t J tρ πνΔ = + Δ ∝ Δ
0.5
1
• The time correlation for the amplitude is
( ) ( )20 2t J tρ πνΔ ∝ Δ
0
( ) ( )0 max2t J tρ πνΔ ∝ Δ0 0.5 1 1.5 2
-0.5
max tν Δ
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 35
Small-scale fadingThe Doppler spectrumThe Doppler spectrum
Uncorrelated scatteringDoppler spectrumat center frequency f
( )0DS fν −
Uncorrelated scatteringwith uniform angular distribution
D l t b F i
at center frequency f0.
Doppler spectrum by Fouriertransformation of the timecorrelation of the signal:
( ) ( ) 2jS dπν τ− ΔΔ Δ∫0 maxf ν− 0 maxf ν+0f
( ) ( ) 2
1
jDS e dπν τν ρ τ τΔ= Δ Δ
∝
∫
2 2maxπ ν ν−
for ν ν ν− < <What does this mean in practice?
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 36
for max maxν ν ν< <
![Page 10: Channel Modelling –ETI 085 Contents 2 · 2009. 10. 28. · 2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson -ETI 085 6 Small-scale fading TwowavesTwo waves Wave 1 Wave 1 + Wave 2 W2Wave 2 2009-10-29](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071412/610a1880edf2c618f1381daf/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Small-scale fadingFading dipsFading dips
Wh t b t th l th d th fReceived amplitude [dB]
r
What about the length and the frequencyof fading dips ?
*rrmsr
|dBMImportant for system designblock lengthcode design
*rg
choice of modulation
TimeTime
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 37
Small-scale fadingStatistics of fading dipsStatistics of fading dips
Frequency of the fading dips Length of fading dipsFrequency of the fading dips(normalized dips/second)
Length of fading dips(normalized dip-length)
These curves are for Rayleigh fading and isotropic
2009-10-29 Fredrik Tufvesson - ETI 085 38
These curves are for Rayleigh fading and isotropicuncorrelated scattering (Jakes’ doppler spectrum).