Challenges in linking different storage technologies ......2019/02/05 · Magnet protection system...
Transcript of Challenges in linking different storage technologies ......2019/02/05 · Magnet protection system...
Challenges in linking different storage technologies: Combining batteries and SMES for improved performance of energy storage
Antonio MorandiDEI − Guglielmo Marconi Dep. of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering
University of Bologna, Italy
Workshop on Hybrid Energy and Energy Storage Systems
14 November 2018, Bruxelles, Belgium
2
• SMES – who they are and state of development
• Hybrid SMES / Battery Energy Storage
• Motivations
• Case studies
• Fast Charging Stations
• Wind
• Solar
Outline
PCS
Control and protection system
Cooling system
Superconducting coil
grid
Current leads
vacuum vessel
3
SMES – Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage
2
0
2
0
2
21
22ILdBdBW
coil
=≈= ∫∫∞ ττ
τµ
τµ
Advantages• High deliverable power • Infinite number of charge
discharge cycles• High efficiency of the charge
and discharge phase (round trip)
• Fast response time from stand-by to full power
• No safety hazard
Critical aspects• Low storage capacity• Need for high auxiliary power (cooling)• Stand-by losses
4
• Flexible architecture - Control algorithm defined based on the service to be provided • Power modulation (grid/load decoupling)• Islanding operation (UPS)• Active filtering
• Magnet protection system integrated in the PCS both at HD and the SW level
Power Conditioning System - detail
System level control P*, Q*, i*, v*
DC/AC - inverter DC/DC - chopper
5
To know on SMES – 1 / Energy capacity
Typical rating of SMES in the order of MJs (MW × seconds)
• Energy: MJs → kWs
32 cm
1.2 kWh Commercial Li-battery module
Energy capacity of large SMES comparable with that of small battery systems
• Power: MWs
1 MW Li-battery system (groupnire.com)
Power capacity of SMES comparable with that of large battery systems
6
To know on SMES – 2 / Standby lossesCurrent of SMES free-wheels through PE switches when no power is delivered/absorbed. Losses are produced during the standby
Von IGBT = 0.5 − 1.5 VVon DIODE = 0.5 − 1 V
PIGBT = ISMES Von IGBT PDIODE = ISMES Von DIODE
Pidling = 1 − 5 kW / kA
SMES currentdelivered power L C
Vdc
ISMESDC /
AC
SMES
• The whole energy of the SMES is lost in the power electronics within a few minutes
• SMES is only suitable for continuous operation
7
To know on SMES – 3 / Efficiency
cs
tPtP
ηη
η∆∆
=
P, deliverable power ∆t , duration of delivery ∆ tcycle , duration of the cycle∆ tidle, duration of idling phaseηs , intrinsic efficiency of the storage device ηc , efficiency of the convertersPaux , power required for auxiliary services Pidle , power loss (if any) during idling
cycle
power
energy
idleidlecs
tPtPtP
∆+∆
∆=
ηη
η
aux cycle idle idles c
P tP t P t P t
η
η η
∆=
∆+ ∆ + ∆
High efficiency of SMES achieved in case• High exchanged power• No (or short) stand-by / continuous power
management(additional services can mitigate this)
8
Japan
Germany
EM Laucher
Japan
USA
Japan
Italy
France
Germany
Power modulatorFlicker
Grid compensation
The state of the art of SMES technology
The DRYSMES4GRID project:• 500 kJ / 200 kW SMES• MgB2 material• Cryogen free cooling
9
• SMES – who they are and state of development
• Hybrid SMES / Battery Energy Storage
• Motivations
• Case studies
• Fast Charging Stations
• Wind
• Solar
Outline
10
Which storage technology?
Parameters of the energy storage system • Absorbed/supplied power, P• Duration delivery, ∆t• Number of cycles, N• Response time, tr
No unique storage technology exists able to span the wide range of characteristics required for applications
• Most suitable storage technology must be chosen from case to case
• Hybrid systems, obtained by combining Energy Intensive Storage (EIS) with Power Intensive Storage (PIS), can be the best solution in many cases
11
Combined use of synergistic technologies
A 350kW/2.5MWh Liquid Air Energy Storage (LAES) pilot plant was completed and tied to grid during 2011-2014 in England.
Fundraising for further development is in progress
• LAES is used as energy intensive storage • Large cooling power (not all) is available for SMES
due to the presence of Liquid air at 70 K• SMES is used as power intensive storage
Effective hybrid (Energy intensive + Power intensive) storage can be conceived based on combined use of SMES and LAES
A 1-2 MW / 2-5 min rating for SMES may be of interest.Demanding !!!
12
Hybrid energy storage systems – Motivations
DC/DCBattery
Grid Load
DC/DCSMES
DC/ACLow-pass Control
High-pass ControlSy
stem
Cont
rol
Operation• High frequency components of the power spectra are
assigned to SMES by means of a high pass control • Low frequency components are left to battery
time, auQualitative (not a real case)
Complementary characteristics exploited
• Battery provides long term base power – hence energy
• SMES provides peak power and fast cycling
Advantages:
• Reduced power rating of batteries • Reduced energy rating of SMES • Reduced wear and tear of
batteries (no minor cycling)
Pmax = 0.38
Pmax = 0.62
Emax = 1
Emax = 0.18
14
• SMES – who they are and state of development
• Hybrid SMES / Battery Energy Storage
• Motivations
• Case studies
• Fast Charging Stations
• Wind
• Solar
Outline
15
BESS
DC
DC
DC
DC
SMES
DC
DC
DC/DC
DC/DC
DC/DC
DC/DC
DC/DC
DC/DC
DC/DC
DC/DC
Slot 1
Slot 2
Slot 3
Slot 4
Slot 5
Slot 6
Slot 7
Slot 8
Charging SlotsHybrid Battery-SMES ESS
PV power plant
Case study – A PV powered fast charging station DC
AC
Grid
Objective: minimizing exchange with the grid - Pgrid ≤ 100 kW
Simplifying assumption: the system operates off grid - Pgrid = 0
16
Load profile of the FCS – Assumptions:
Max 8 × 25 kWh vehicles recharging at 5CMax power of each slot: 125 kWMax total power: 1000 kW
time, s
Total delivered power, kWTotal delivered energy, kWh
Load profile of the FCS obtained from estimated quick charging needs – Aalto University, Finland
Data adapted from F. H. Malik and M. Lehtonen, "Minimization of queuing time of electric vehicles at a fast charging station," 2017 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT-Europe), Torino, 2017, pp. 1-6
Total energy delivered by the FCS in one day: 7.3 MWh
time, s
Production of the PV plant - Assumptions:
The PV produce in one day all the energy required by the FCS
17time, s
Total power produced by the PV plant, kW
time, s
Total energy produced by the PV plant, kWh
Total energy produced by the PV plant in one day: 7.3 MWh
Data adapted from the measured production of a real PV plant
18
Energy and power rating of the EES
Power delivered/adsorber by the EES is obtained by difference:
PEES = Pslots – PPV
time, s
Total Power of the EES, kW
time, s
Total energy of the EES, kWh
An initial charge at 0,6 MWh is assumed for the EES in order to avoid discharge below 20 % of SOC max
Peak Power = ± 800 kW
19
time, s
Total Power of the EES, kW
time, s
Total energy of the EES, kWh
• The energy rating of the ESS is (about) 2.2 MWh
• The max power rating of the ESS is (about) ± 800 KW
A 2.2 MWh EES operating at a maximum rate of C3 fulfils the requirements . This performance can be reached with batteries.
20
Is there a role for SMES?
Low pass control
High pass control
Note: no claim is made to elaborate an optimized control strategy
( Is there an adavantage for hybridization )?
Battery
SMES
total
time, s
Power of the EES componets, kW
21
Battery
SMES
total
time, s
Power of the EES components, kW
Battery
SMES
total
time, s
Power of the EES components, kW
Power RatingTotal 800 kW input 800 kW output
Battery 460 kW input 320 kW output
SMES 680 kW input 520 kW output
Energy RatingTotal 2200 kWh
Battery 2200 kWh
SMES 680 kWh
• Power rating of batteries reduced by nearly 50 %
• Energy rating (and minor cycling) of battery substantially unchanged
• Energy rating of SMES less than 20 % of batteries – still demanding!
22
Miller, GE Experience with Turbine Integrated BES, PES 2014
Controlling wind power
Area wide AGC is emitted on 5 minutes base based on frequency deviation
Predictable wind Powerdemonstrated
200 kWh of batteries GE 1.6 MW – 100 m
Demonstrated- GE @Tehachapi - 2012
23
Energy/power rating for wind control
A case study –Controlling a 20 MW Wind power plant
0 1000 2000 3000
time, seconds
59.95
60
60.05
frequ
ency
, Hz
∆f = ± 12 mHz∆P = ± 10 %
time, s
Power of the wind plant, MW
dispached
produced
Power of the storage, MW
time, s
Measured grid frequency, July 7 2016
24
Battery
SMES
total
time, s
Power of the EES components, MW
Battery
SMES
total
time, s
Power of the EES components, kW
Power profile non suitable to be split in a low frequency + high frequency component
• Power rating of battery little affected …..
Controlling Solar Power
A case study – Controlling a 285 MW solar power plant with a 85 MW EES
Solar Power
Energy shifted at sunset“Duck Curve” Smoothing
… of very high value for power system
Delivered Power
Power profile suitable for hybridization
EES Power
SMES 6 MWh
Qualitatively …..
27
DTT - Divertor Tokamak Test Facility
150 MW × 80 s (1.2 GJ) –1 per hour
Research facilities with pulsed power
Industry ± 1-10 MW × 20 min – continuous
More cases with reduced size should be looked for in industry (press, rolling mills, punchers …)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
time, mimutes
0
10
20
30
40
50
pow
er, M
W
Railway substation± 20 MW × 3 min – continuous
JapanSource 10.1109/TASC.2005.849333
A note: more case studies for application of power intensive and/or hybrid storage can be looked for in industry
28
Question 1: Does a power profile suitable to be split in a "high power / low energy" and a "high energy / reduced power" component exist in the real world? What can be a case study?
Question 2: Is there a power intensive storage technology able to bring a substantial - not marginal - benefits to batteries? Can SMES succeed in this?
…. finally
29
30
31
• Stephentown, NY, since 2011
• HazleTownship, PE, since 2014
Flywheels perform between 3,000 and 5,000 full depth-of-discharge cycles a year.
Beacon power ±20 MW frequency regulation plant
~7’ tall, 3’ in diameter 2,500 pound rotor mass Spins up to 15,500 rpm 100 kW, 25 KWh (charge and discharge)
110 m
130 m
20 × 10 × 0.1 kW fly-wheel units
No loss data available
32
110 m
130 m
±20 MW frequency regulation plant based on SMES
110 m
130 m8 T
Operating field 8 TToroidal diameter (outer) 70 mPoloidal diameter 2 m
3 T
Operating field 3 T2 × 100 m × 50 m loopsTransverse diameter 2 m
qualitativeSource: civicsolar.com
±20 MW frequency regulation plant feasible also based on SMES
No battery technology can be used for copying with 60000 cycles (20 years) unless very substantial overrating is applied
60000 cycles possible at 5 % DOD400 MW rating needed!!!!!
0 1000 2000 3000
time, seconds
59.95
60
60.05
frequ
ency
, Hz
33
Miller, GE Experience with Turbine Integrated BES, PES 2013
Controlling wind power
100 % P 90 % P 80 % P
• AGC is emitted on 5 minutes base based on frequency deviation
34
35
36
37
38
Possible Hybrid systems
ENERGY INTENSIVEPOWER INTENSIVE
Sc, smes o fw + batterie
Batt + thermal o caes
Smes + LAES o LH2 (sinerg)
39
1. A 200 kJ Nb-Ti µSMES ( 2000 – 2004 )
Cold test in 2004 (and 2013)
40
2. Conduction cooled MgB2 SMES demonstrator (2014 – 2016)
• 3 kJ MgB2 Magnet• 40 KW Mosfet Based PCS
Cold test completedFull test at 1-10 kW to come shortly
41
• Transmission and distribution• Dispersed generation, active networks and storage• Renewables (PV and Biomass )• Energy efficiency in the civil, industry and tertiary sectors• Exploitation of Solar and ambient heat for air conditioning
MISE - Italian Ministry of Economic DevelopmentCompetitive call: research project for electric power grid
The DRYSMES4GRID Project
Partners • University of Bologna• ICAS - The Italian Consortium for ASC, Frascati (Rome)• RSE S.p.A - Ricerca sul Sistema Energetico, Milan• CNR – SPIN, Genoa
Project DRYSMES4GRID funded
• Budget: 2.7 M€• Time: June 2017 – June 2020
Project Coordinator:• Columbus Superconductors SpA, Genova, Italy
• developm. of dry-cooled SMES based on MgB2• 300 kJ – 100 kW / full system
42
43
https://www.google.it/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwilxOTR29DeAhUDa1AKHTVaBYMQjhx6BAgBEAM&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.powertechsystems.eu%2Fhome%2Ftech-corner%2Flithium-iron-phosphate-lifepo4%2F&psig=AOvVaw3suYBvsn7rL24Yd0j4Mwa4&ust=1542175780234214