Challenger: Case Study in Engineering Ethics and Communications Tom Rebold Adapted from Tufte,...

16
Challenger: Case Study in Engineering Ethics and Communications Tom Rebold Adapted from Tufte, Visual Explanations And http ://www.footnote.tv/mwchallenger.html

Transcript of Challenger: Case Study in Engineering Ethics and Communications Tom Rebold Adapted from Tufte,...

Page 1: Challenger: Case Study in Engineering Ethics and Communications Tom Rebold Adapted from Tufte, Visual Explanations And .

Challenger: Case Study in Engineering Ethics and

Communications

Tom ReboldAdapted from Tufte, Visual Explanations

And http://www.footnote.tv/mwchallenger.html

Page 2: Challenger: Case Study in Engineering Ethics and Communications Tom Rebold Adapted from Tufte, Visual Explanations And .

The IncidentJanuary 28, 1986

  Launch About 80 seconds after Launch

 

                                                                  

   

                                                                 

    

Page 3: Challenger: Case Study in Engineering Ethics and Communications Tom Rebold Adapted from Tufte, Visual Explanations And .
Page 4: Challenger: Case Study in Engineering Ethics and Communications Tom Rebold Adapted from Tufte, Visual Explanations And .
Page 5: Challenger: Case Study in Engineering Ethics and Communications Tom Rebold Adapted from Tufte, Visual Explanations And .
Page 6: Challenger: Case Study in Engineering Ethics and Communications Tom Rebold Adapted from Tufte, Visual Explanations And .
Page 7: Challenger: Case Study in Engineering Ethics and Communications Tom Rebold Adapted from Tufte, Visual Explanations And .
Page 8: Challenger: Case Study in Engineering Ethics and Communications Tom Rebold Adapted from Tufte, Visual Explanations And .
Page 9: Challenger: Case Study in Engineering Ethics and Communications Tom Rebold Adapted from Tufte, Visual Explanations And .

The Investigation

Page 10: Challenger: Case Study in Engineering Ethics and Communications Tom Rebold Adapted from Tufte, Visual Explanations And .

O-Rings were a known problem

• 1970’s: less safe than more expensive alternative

• 1985: scorching becomes noticeable• Thiokol analysis shows worse on colder days• Launch constraint by NASA (waived every launch)• Thiokol Engineer Roger Boisjoly warns superiors

“we could lose a flight”

• August ’85: NASA Meeting, no changes• Later, Feynman calls this strategy “Russian Roulette”

Page 11: Challenger: Case Study in Engineering Ethics and Communications Tom Rebold Adapted from Tufte, Visual Explanations And .

Night Before Launch

• Boisjoly and others: “too cold, delay launch!” – Until 53ºF

• Management: how come some warmer launches show scorching?– (crucial fact ignored--every single launch in cold

temperatures showed damage)

• Thiokol management gets the engineers to accept a launch recommendation.

Page 12: Challenger: Case Study in Engineering Ethics and Communications Tom Rebold Adapted from Tufte, Visual Explanations And .

Role of CommunicationsChart used by Thiokol Engineers on Jan 27 before launch

Page 13: Challenger: Case Study in Engineering Ethics and Communications Tom Rebold Adapted from Tufte, Visual Explanations And .

A Revised Chart by Rogers Commission Showing all launches

Temperature at

Challenger Launch, 32ºF

Page 14: Challenger: Case Study in Engineering Ethics and Communications Tom Rebold Adapted from Tufte, Visual Explanations And .

Obfuscation during investigation

• Famous physicist Richard Feynman performs experiment on television– Dips o-ring in ice-water– Shows greater stiffness– also complains about

slides, bullets

• Edward Tufte, designer– Provides further damning

analysis of charts– Condemns PowerPoint

Page 15: Challenger: Case Study in Engineering Ethics and Communications Tom Rebold Adapted from Tufte, Visual Explanations And .

Another Communication Problem

• Decisions

• Knowledge of details

Page 16: Challenger: Case Study in Engineering Ethics and Communications Tom Rebold Adapted from Tufte, Visual Explanations And .

Epilogue• Several families sued NASA management

– between $2 and 3.5 million per family. – Morton Thiokol paying 60 percent

• Roger Boisjoly, Thiokol engineer – testified before Congress– sued Thiokol under a federal whistleblowing statute (lost)– left the company– underwent therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder– awarded the Prize for Scientific Freedom from the AAAS, – now lectures on workplace ethics issues (in Australia)

• Thiokol gave up $10 million incentive fee – did not sign a document admitting to legal liability.

• NASA bans commercial or military payloads from shuttle– launched on unmanned rockets