Ch 03 05 Soil Clasification

download Ch 03 05 Soil Clasification

of 10

Transcript of Ch 03 05 Soil Clasification

  • 8/21/2019 Ch 03 05 Soil Clasification

    1/10

    1

    CE353 Soil Mechanics

    Dr.Talat Bader

    Civil Engineering Department

    King Fahad University of Petroleum & Minerals

    1

    CE353Geotechnical

    Engineering Laboratory

    SOILCLASSIFICATION

    Dr. Talat Bader

    Lecture

    5

    2

    Lecture 5SOIL

    CLASSIFICATION

    Dr. Talat A Bader

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    3

    Why do we need to

    classify soils ?

    To describe various soil types

    encountered in the nature in a

    systematic way and gathering

    soils that have distinct physicalproperties in groups and units.

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    4

    General Requirements of a

    soil Classification Systems

    Based on a scientific method

    Simple Permit classification by visual and

    manual tests

    Describe certain engineeringproperties

    Should be accepted to all engineers

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    5

    Classification Systemso Geologic Soil Classification System

    o Agronomic Soil Classification System

    Textural Soil Classification System (USDA)

    Unified Soil Classification System (USCS)

    American Association of State HighwayTransportation Officials System (AASHTO)

    American Society for Testing and MaterialsSystem (ASTM)

    Federal Aviation Agency System (FAA)

    Others

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    6

    The Simplest

    Classification

    0.075-4.754.75-75Unified

  • 8/21/2019 Ch 03 05 Soil Clasification

    2/10

    2

    CE353 Soil Mechanics

    Dr.Talat Bader

    Civil Engineering Department

    King Fahad University of Petroleum & Minerals

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    7

    ChartCassagrande's

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    8

    Textural Soil Classification

    System (USDA)

    USDA considers only:

    No. Gravel in the System

    Sand Silt Clay

    If you encounter gravel in the soil ------- Subtract the % of gravel from the100%.

    12 Subgroups in the system

    Also Called Agriculture Classification System

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    9

    Basses for the

    Classification

    d 0.002mmlays0.002mm d < 0.05mmilts

    0.05mm d < 2mmands2mm d 75mmravels

    d > 75mmobblesBouldersDiameter RangeSoil Type

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    10

    mm2d%with100%

    2mmd0.05mmwith%Sand%Relative

    =

    mm2d%with100%

    mm05.d0.002mmwith%Silt%Relative

    =

    mm2d%with100%

    0.002mmdwith%Clay%Relative

    =

    The USDA classification system

    is based on

    the relative % sand, % silt, and % clay.

    These

    %age

    Are

    Based

    On

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    11

    Textural Soil ClassificationSystem (USDA)

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    12

    Example 1

    Classify the following soil by the

    USDA Textural Classification

    System. Given Data

    % gravel = 18; % sand = 51;% silt = 22; %clay = 9

  • 8/21/2019 Ch 03 05 Soil Clasification

    3/10

    3

    CE353 Soil Mechanics

    Dr.Talat Bader

    Civil Engineering Department

    King Fahad University of Petroleum & Minerals

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    13

    Solution:Example 1Since we have 18% Gravel

    the soil to be classifiedis = 100 18 = 82%

    Calculating the % sand = 51/ 82 = 62%

    Calculating the % silt = 22/ 82 = 27%

    Calculating the % clay = 09/ 82 = 11%

    Using these values in the USAC

    Given Data

    % gravel = 18;

    % sand = 51;

    % silt = 22;

    % clay = 9

    sandy loam

    Then the Soil is Classified as

    However, due to the presence of 18% gravel inthe soil, it is

    called " gravell y sandy loam."CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    14

    Textural Soil Classification

    System (USDA)

    Sand=62%Silt =27%Clay=11%

    Back

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    15

    Example 2

    Classify the following soil by the

    USDA Textural Classification

    System.

    Given:

    % gravel = 0 ; % sand = 30;% silt = 30; % clay = 40;

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    16

    Solution: Example 2

    % sand Present = 30/ 100 = 30%

    % silt Present = 30/ 100 = 30%

    % clay Present = 40/ 100 = 40%

    Using these values in the USAC

    clay

    Then the Soil is Classified as

    Given Data

    % gravel = 0;

    % sand = 30;

    % silt = 30;

    % clay = 40

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    17

    Textural Soil Classification

    System (USDA)

    sand=30%

    silt =30%

    clay =40%

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    18

    Unified Classification System

    (UCS)

    Divides soils into two categories Coarse &Fine

    Atterberg Limitschecks for Law and HighCompressibility

    Used by Geotechnical engineers for selectingappropriate soils in non-highway projects

    Last modified in 1991

    First Developed by the Army Corps ofEngineers Based in 1942.

    G = Gravel

    S = Sand

    M = Silt

    C = ClayO = Organic

    USC Main Groups

  • 8/21/2019 Ch 03 05 Soil Clasification

    4/10

    4

    CE353 Soil Mechanics

    Dr.Talat Bader

    Civil Engineering Department

    King Fahad University of Petroleum & Minerals

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    19

    Unified Soil Classification

    (USC) System

    Fine Grained

    More than 50% Passing

    Sieve 200

    Coarse Grained

    Less than 50% Passing

    Sieve 200

    More than 50%

    Passing Sieve 4

    Less than 50%

    Passing Sieve 4

    Clay Silt Organic

    Gravel Sand

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    20

    Cassagrande's Chart

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    21

    Unified Soil Classification (USC) System

    Course Grained

    >50% passing Sieve 200

    >5% Passing

    Sieve 200

    = 4

    Cz=1-3

    Cu< 6

    Cz=1-3

    GM GC

    PI < 4

    Below

    A-Line

    PI > 7

    Above

    A-Line

    >5% Passing

    Sieve 200

    =6

    Cz=1-3

    Cu>=6

    Cz=1-3

    SM SC

    PI 7

    Above

    A-Line

    Gravelly Soils

    Less than 50%

    passing

    Sieve 4

    Sandy Soils

    More than 50%

    passing

    Sieve 4

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    22

    Cassagrande's Chart

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    23

    Unified Soil Classification (USC) System

    Fine Grained>50% passing Sieve 200

    75.0LL

    LLRatioLimitLiquid

    Undried

    DriedOven= Then the Soil is Organic

    MLCL MH CH OL OH Pt

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    24

    ChartCassagrande's

  • 8/21/2019 Ch 03 05 Soil Clasification

    5/10

    5

    CE353 Soil Mechanics

    Dr.Talat Bader

    Civil Engineering Department

    King Fahad University of Petroleum & Minerals

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    25

    Cu>= 4

    Cz=1-3

    Cu< 6

    Cz=1-3

    GPGW

    PI < 4

    Below

    A-Line

    PI > 7

    Above

    A-Line

    GM GC

    Cu>=6

    Cz=1-3

    Cu>=6

    Cz=1-3

    SPSW

    PI 7

    Above

    A-Line

    SM SC

    ML

    MH

    OH

    CL

    CH

    OL

    Pt

    >5% Passing

    Sieve 200

    5% Passing

    Sieve 200

  • 8/21/2019 Ch 03 05 Soil Clasification

    6/10

    6

    CE353 Soil Mechanics

    Dr.Talat Bader

    Civil Engineering Department

    King Fahad University of Petroleum & Minerals

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    31

    Coarse = 100 - 76 = 24%, soFINE-GRAINED SOIL

    LL = 60, and PI = 32

    Classification CH, inorganic claywith high plasticity

    Using Gasagrandi Chart

    32607699B

    (cumulative % passing)

    PILLNo. 200

    Sieve

    No.4

    Sieve

    Soil

    Solution

    Soil B

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    32

    ChartCassagrande's

    3260Soil B

    PILL

    Soil

    B

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    33

    Coarse = 100 - 35 = 65%, so

    COARSE-GRAINED SOIL

    20% retained on No. 4, vs. 65%coarse, 20/65 = 31% (

  • 8/21/2019 Ch 03 05 Soil Clasification

    7/10

    7

    CE353 Soil Mechanics

    Dr.Talat Bader

    Civil Engineering Department

    King Fahad University of Petroleum & Minerals

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    37

    AASHTO System

    Soils are classified into 7 major groups

    A-1 to A-7 Granular

    A-1 {A-1-a - A-1-b}

    Gravel & Sand

    A-2 {A-2-4 - A-2-5 - A-2-6 - A-2-6}

    A-3

    More than 35% pass # 200

    A-4

    A-5 Fine

    A-6 (Silt & Clay)

    A-7CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    38

    AASHTO

    Soil Classification System

    Fair to poorExcellent to goodGeneral

    subgrade rating

    Clayey SoilsSilty SoilsSilty or clayey gravel and sandFinesand

    Stone

    fragments,gravel, and

    sand

    Usual types of

    significant

    constituent

    materials

    41 min

    11 min

    40 max

    11 min

    41 min

    10 max

    40 max

    10 max

    41 min

    11 min

    40 max

    11 min

    41 min

    10 max

    40 max

    10 max

    -

    NP

    -

    6 max.

    Characteristic of

    Fraction passingNo. 40

    Liquid Limit

    Plasticity index

    36 min.36 min.36 min.36 min.35 max.35 max.35 max.35 max.

    51 min.

    10 max

    50 max.

    25 max.

    50 max.

    30 max.

    15 max.

    Sieve Analysis

    % Passing

    No. 10

    No. 40

    No.200

    A-7-5

    A-7-6A-2-7A-2-6A-2-5A-2-4

    A-1-bA-1-a

    A-7

    A-6A-5A-4

    A-2

    A-3

    A-1Group

    Classification

    Silty-Clay materials

    (more than 35% passing No.

    200)

    Granular materials

    (35% or less of Total Sample passing No. 200)

    General

    Classification

    Plasticity index of A-7-5 subgrade is equal to or less than LL minus 30

    Plasticity index of A-7-6 subgrade is grater than LL minus 30

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    39

    Basses of

    AASHTO Classification

    I. Grain size

    a) Boulders (larger than 75mm), notclassified, but recorded

    b) Gravel: material passing 75mm sieve,retained on 2mm sieve

    c) Sand: material passing 2mm sieve,retained on 0.075mm sieve

    d) Silt and Clay: pass 0.075mm sieve

    II. Plasticitya) Plasticity index =10, soils are

    silty

    b) Plasticity index =11, soils areclayey

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    40

    ChartCassagrande's

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    41

    Basses of AASHTO

    Classification

    III. Categories range A-1 to A-7

    a) A-1 is most suitable for building

    material

    b) A-1 through A-3 are sands and

    gravels

    c) A-4 and A-5 are silty soils

    d) A-6 and A-7 are clayey soils

    e) A-7 is least suitable

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    42

    AASHTO Soil Classification System

    Fair to poorExcellent to goodGeneral

    subgrade rating

    Clayey SoilsSilty SoilsSilty or clayey gravel and sandFinesand

    Stone

    fragments,gravel, and

    sand

    Usual types of

    significantconstituent

    materials

    41 min

    11 min

    40 max

    11 min

    41 min

    10 max

    40 max

    10 max

    41 min

    11 min

    40 max

    11 min

    41 min

    10 max

    40 max

    10 max

    -

    NP

    -

    6 max.

    Characteristic of

    Fraction passing

    No. 40

    Liquid Limit

    Plasticity index

    36 min.36 min.36 min.36 min.35 max.35 max.35 max.35 max.

    51 min.

    10 max

    50 max.

    25 max.

    50 max.

    30 max.

    15 max.

    Sieve Analysis

    % Passing

    No. 10

    No. 40

    No.200

    A-7-5

    A-7-6A-2-7A-2-6A-2-5A-2-4

    A-1-bA-1-a

    A-7

    A-6A-5A-4

    A-2

    A-3

    A-1Group

    Classification

    Silty-Clay materials

    (more than 35% passing No.200)

    Granular materials

    (35% or less of Total Sample passing No. 200)

    General

    Classification

    Plasticity index of A-7-5 subgrade is equal to or less than LL minus 30

    Plasticity index of A-7-6 subgrade is grater than LL minus 30

  • 8/21/2019 Ch 03 05 Soil Clasification

    8/10

    8

    CE353 Soil Mechanics

    Dr.Talat Bader

    Civil Engineering Department

    King Fahad University of Petroleum & Minerals

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    43

    AASHTO

    Group Index (GI)

    GI = (F-35) [0.2 + 0.005( LL-40)] + 0.01( F-15)( PI-10)

    Where:

    GI can be computed to furtherclassify soils within a given group.

    F= % Passing Sieve 200

    LL= Liquid Limits

    PI= Plasticity Index

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    44

    Basses of AASHTO

    Classification

    IV. Subcategories , or Group

    Index Numbers

    a) Range from 0 (best engineering

    value)

    b) to 20 (poorest engineering

    value)

    c) In parentheses following

    category

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    45

    Example 4

    Classify the following soil Using

    AASHTO System.

    Given:

    % passing Sieve No. 200 = 95%

    LL = 60

    PI = 40.

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    46

    Solution: Example 4

    Is A-7-6.

    From Table, the group classification

    Now we Calculate the Group IndexGI= (F-35) [0.2 + 0.005(LL-40)] + 0.01(F-15)(PI-10)

    Using the given data, F= 95, LL=60 & PI=40GI= (95-35)[ 0.2 + 0.005( 60-40)] + 0.01( 95-15)(40-10)GI= (35)[ 0.2 + 0.005(60)] + 0.01( 60-15)(40-10)GI= (35)[ 0.5] + 13.5

    GI= 31.0Then GI= 31.0 --> 31

    Thus, the AASHTO Classification is

    A - 7 - 6 (31); Clayey Soil;Fair to poor As subgrade material

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    47

    Fair to poorExcellent to goodGeneral

    subgrade rating

    Clayey SoilsSilty SoilsSilty or clayey gravel and sandFinesand

    Stone

    fragments,gravel, and

    sand

    Usual types of

    significant

    constituentmaterials

    41 min

    11 min

    40 max

    11 min

    41 min

    10 max

    40 max

    10 max

    41 min

    11 min

    40 max

    11 min

    41 min

    10 max

    40 max

    10 max

    -

    NP

    -

    6 max.

    Characteristic of

    Fraction passing

    No. 40

    Liquid Limit

    Plasticity index

    36 min.36 min.36 min.36 min.35 max.35 max.35 max.35 max.

    51 min.

    10 max

    50 max.

    25 max.

    50 max.

    30 max.

    15 max.

    Sieve Analysis

    % Passing

    No. 10

    No. 40

    No.200

    A-7-5

    A-7-6A-2-7A-2-6A-2-5A-2-4

    A-1-bA-1-a

    A-7

    A-6A-5A-4

    A-2

    A-3

    A-1Group

    Classification

    Silty-Clay materials

    (more than 35% passing No.200)

    Granular materials

    (35% or less of Total Sample passing No. 200)

    General

    Classification

    Red =

    Green =% passing Sieve No. 200 = 95%

    LL = 60 & PI = 40.

    Plasticity index of A-7-5 subgrade is equal to or less than LL minus 30

    Plasticity index of A-7-6 subgrade is grater than LL minus 30

    Nonof these

    No No No

    PI(40) is grater than LL-30=(30)

    Is A-7-6.Next

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    48

    Example # 5Classify the following soil Using

    AASHTO System.

    % passing No. 10 = 100;

    % passing No. 40 = 80;

    % passing No.200 = 58

    LL = 30; PI = 10.

    Given:

  • 8/21/2019 Ch 03 05 Soil Clasification

    9/10

    9

    CE353 Soil Mechanics

    Dr.Talat Bader

    Civil Engineering Department

    King Fahad University of Petroleum & Minerals

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    49

    is A-4.

    Solution: Example 5From Table, the group classification

    Using the given data, F= 58, LL=30 & PI=10

    GI= (58-23)[ 0.2 + 0.005( 30-40)] + 0.01( 58-15)(10-10)GI= (35)[ 0.2 + 0.005(-10)] + 0.01( 58-15)(0)GI= 5.25

    Then GI= 5.25 --> 5

    Thus, the AASHTO Classification is

    A- 4 (5); Silty Soil; Fair to poor As subgrade material

    Now we Calculate the Group IndexGI= (F-35) [0.2 + 0.005(LL-40)] + 0.01(F-15)(PI-10)

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    50

    % passing No. 10 = 100;

    % passing No. 40 = 80;

    Fair to poorExcellent to goodGeneral

    subgrade rating

    Clayey SoilsSilty SoilsSilty or clayey gravel and sandFinesand

    Stone

    fragments,gravel, and

    sand

    Usual types of

    significantconstituent

    materials

    41 min

    11 min

    40 max

    11 min

    41 min

    10 max

    40 max

    10 max

    41 min

    11 min

    40 max

    11 min

    41 min

    10 max

    40 max

    10 max

    -

    NP

    -

    6 max.

    Characteristic of

    Fraction passing

    No. 40

    Liquid Limit

    Plasticity index

    36 min.36 min.36 min.36 min.35 max.35 max.35 max.35 max.

    51 min.

    10 max

    50 max.

    25 max.

    50 max.

    30 max.

    15 max.

    Sieve Analysis

    % Passing

    No. 10

    No. 40

    No.200

    A-7-5

    A-7-6A-2-7A-2-6A-2-5A-2-4

    A-1-bA-1-a

    A-7A-6A-5A-4

    A-2A-3

    A-1GroupClassification

    Silty-Clay materials

    (more than 35% passing No.200)

    Granular materials

    (35% or less of Total Sample passing No. 200)

    GeneralClassification

    % passing No.200 = 58LL = 30; PI = 10.

    Plasticity index of A-7-5 subgrade is equal to or less than LL minus 30

    Plasticity index of A-7-6 subgrade is grater than LL minus 30

    Nonof these

    No No No

    Nextis A-4.

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    51

    Thank youQuestion Time

    Dr. Talat BaderCE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    52

    Talat

    This is a reminder that thefollowing slides are just for maybe future use as a secondexample or a quiz

    http://www.engr.uaa.alaska.edu/Sc

    hool_of_Engineering/Courses/eqe694f/694F_F97_Lecture2.html Ask Sam

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    53

    Example Classify this

    Soil

    (sum = 450)

    0.06.931.2panpan

    6.913.460.40.075200

    20.421.295.60.150100

    41.619.889.10.25060

    61.422.8102.60.42540

    84.211.049.50.85020

    95.24.821.62.00010

    100.00.004.7504

    Cumulative

    passing

    %

    retained

    Mass

    retainedDiameter

    US

    Sieve

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    54

    Calculations

    D10 = 0.11

    D30 = 0.19

    D60 = 0.38

    Cu = D60/D10 = 3.45

    Cc = (D30)2/(D60

    . D10) = 0.86

  • 8/21/2019 Ch 03 05 Soil Clasification

    10/10

    10

    CE353 Soil Mechanics

    Dr.Talat Bader

    Civil Engineering Department

    King Fahad University of Petroleum & Minerals

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    55

    Example #4

    Classify the following soil usingUCS

    Given: gravel fraction (% retainedon #4) = 30%

    Sand fraction (passing #4, retainedon #200) = 40%

    Silt and clay fraction (passing#200) = 30%

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    56

    Solution example 4

    Gravel = 30%,

    Sand = 40% and (100-Silts & Clay)/2 = 35%

    Since Sand > (100-F)/2, coarse fraction ismore sandy than gravelly

    Then

    Group symbol is SC

    Then, group name is "Clayey sand withgravel"

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    57

    Example 5

    Classify the following soil using UCS

    Given: gravel fraction (% retained on#4) = 0%

    sand fraction (passing #4, retainedon #200) = 14%

    silt and clay fraction (passing #200)= 86%

    LL = 55; PI = 28

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    58

    Solution Example 6

    Silts & Clay = 86%,

    From Chart

    Group symbol is CH Inorganic

    Clay

    Group name is "Fat Clay"

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    59

    Unified soil

    ClassificationGROUP SYMBOL GROUP NAME

    GW WELL-GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL

    GP POORLY-GRADED GRAVEL

    GM SILTY GRAVEL

    GC CLAYEY GRAVEL

    SW WELL-GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND

    SP POORLY-GRADED SAND

    SM SILTY SAND

    SC CLAYEY SAND

    ML SILT

    CL CLAY

    OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY

    MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT

    CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY

    OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT

    PT PEAT

    CE 353 Dr. Talat Bader

    60

    Thank youQuestion Time

    Dr. Talat Bader