組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network...
Transcript of 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network...
![Page 1: 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081619/60fadc596d316e09cc6cf302/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用
栗原正純 (電気通信大学 情報通信工学科)楯岡孝道 (電気通信大学 情報工学科)
1. ネットワーク符号化
2. ネットワークルーティング
3. 組合せネットワーク
4. ルーティング制御
5. その応用(マルチソースネットワーク)
2006/03/17(名古屋大)
1
![Page 2: 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081619/60fadc596d316e09cc6cf302/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Network Coding and Network Coding Capacity
R. Ahlswede, N. Cai, S.-Y. R. Li and R. W. Yeung, “Network information flow,” 2000.
• Multicast
• Network Coding Capacity ⇐ Max-Flow Bound
S.-Y. R. Li, R. W. Yeung, and N. Cai, “Linear network coding,” 2003.
A, B
A B
A
A
B
B
B
A
A+B
A+B A+B
A+B A+B
S
1 2
3
4
5 6 sink node 2sink node 1
source node
Figure 1: Multicast Network with Link Capacity= 1 ⇒ Network Coding Capacity= 2
2
![Page 3: 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081619/60fadc596d316e09cc6cf302/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity
R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage of Network Coding,” 2004.
• Coding gain and bandwidth saving
• Network Routing Capacity ⇐ [Cannons et al.]
A, B
A B
A
A
B
B
B
A
A
A A
A
S
1 2
3
4
5 6
source node
sink node 2sink node 1
Figure 2: Multicast by routing: Network Routing Capacity= 1.5
3
![Page 4: 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081619/60fadc596d316e09cc6cf302/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity
J. Cannons, R. Dougherty, C. Frieling, and K. Zeger, ”Network Routing Capacity,” 2005.
• Dividing a symbol into h ⇒ 1/h symbol, where h is a positive integer.
M. Medard, M. Effros, T. Ho, D. Karger, “On Coding for Non-Multicast Networks, ” 2003.
A, B C, D
A, C A, D B, C B, D
source node
sink nodes
Figure 3: Special network coding
4
![Page 5: 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081619/60fadc596d316e09cc6cf302/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
1/h symbol
1
1 2
1 2 3
1 2 h
1/1 symbol
1/2 symbol
1/3 symbol
1/h symbol
GF(q)
Figure 4: Dividing a symbol into h
5
![Page 6: 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081619/60fadc596d316e09cc6cf302/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Examples ( h = 2, 3 )
• N : the number of 1/h symbols , which can be translated from the source node to all the
same sink nodes by routing
• N/h : the achievable routing quantity of symbol of the network
a, b, c
a, b b, c
a, b
a, b, c
c
b, c
a
a, c
c a
a, b, c
S
1 2
3
4
5 6
1/2 symbols
Figure 5: N/h = 3/2
a, b, c, d
a, b, c b, c, d
a, b, c
a, b, c, d
c
b, c, d
a
a, d
d a
a, b, c, d
S
1 2
3
4
5 6
1/3 symbols
Figure 6: N/h = 4/3
6
![Page 7: 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081619/60fadc596d316e09cc6cf302/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Definition of Network Routing Capacity ([Cannons et al.])
Network Routing Capacity := max{ N/h | all achievable routing quantities }
An Example:
a, b, c
a, b b, c
a, b
a, b, c
c
b, c
a
a, c
c a
a, b, c
S
1 2
3
4
5 6
1/2 symbols
Figure 7: h = 2 and N = 3 ⇒ Network Routing Capacity = 3/2
7
![Page 8: 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081619/60fadc596d316e09cc6cf302/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
組合せネットワーク((
nm
)Combination Network) ⇒
(nm
)NW
n
m
m
m
source node
sink node sink node sink node
Figure 8:`n
m
´
Combination Network
• Three layers of nodes:
− Top layer :
source node
− Middle layer :
n intermediate nodes
− Bottom layer :
`n
m
´
sink nodes
• Multicast Network
• Link Capacity= 1
8
![Page 9: 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081619/60fadc596d316e09cc6cf302/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Routing Capacity of an(
nm
)NW([Cannons et al.])
n
m
m
m
source node
sink node sink node sink node
Figure 9:`n
m
´
NW
1. (n − m + 1)/h × N ≤ n
⇒ N/h ≤ n/(n − m + 1).
2. N/h ≤ m.
3. n/(n − m + 1) ≤ m ,
where 1 ≤ m ≤ n.
4. Routing Capacity
=n
n − m + 1.
9
![Page 10: 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081619/60fadc596d316e09cc6cf302/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
ルーティング制御: Routing Control on an(
nm
)NW
• N := n and h := n − m + 1 ⇒ N/h = n/(n − m + 1).
• {a0, a1, a2, . . . , an−1} : n 1/h symbols.
• Cyclic shift transfer : Souce node ⇒ n intermediate nodes;
the method of translating h symbols from source node to each intermediate node
T0 := {a0, a1, a2, . . . , ah−1}T1 := {a1, a2, a3, . . . , ah} ...
Ti := {ai, ai+1, ai+2, . . . , ai+h−1} ...
Tn−1 := {an−1, a0, a1, . . . , ah−2}
0
0
1 i n-1
T 1T iT n-1T
a0
a1
a2
an-1
Figure 10: Cyclic shift transfer
10
![Page 11: 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081619/60fadc596d316e09cc6cf302/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
An Example:(32
)NW : Cyclic Shift Transfer
a, b, c
a, b b, c c, a
a, b b
c b, c
c, a a
a, b, c a, b, c a, b, c
1/2 symbols
Figure 11: N = 3, h = 2 and Routing capacity = N/h = 3/2
11
![Page 12: 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081619/60fadc596d316e09cc6cf302/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Routing Control on an(
nm
)NW
• {a0, a1, a2, . . . , an−1} : n 1/h symbols.
• hik: the number of 1/h symbols translated from the intermediate node of No. ik to the
sink node
• (hi0, hi1
, . . . , him−1) : m-tuple of the numbers hi0
, hi1, . . . , him−1
.
•Pm−1
k=0 hik= n.
0h
m
n
h h
0 i i1 m-1
iii
i0 n-1
1 m-1
Figure 12: Routing control for (hi0, hi1
, . . . , him−1)
12
![Page 13: 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081619/60fadc596d316e09cc6cf302/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
An Example:(73
)NW
• (n, m) = (7, 3) ⇒ (N, h) = (7, 5)
• {a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6} : Seven 1/5 symbols
0 2 5 61 3 4
3 3 1
Figure 13: (h0, h3, h5) = (3, 3, 1) and h0+h3+h5 = 7
{h0, h3, h5}{0, 2, 5},
{0, 3, 4},
{1, 1, 5},
{1, 2, 4},
{1, 3, 3},
{2, 2, 3}.
13
![Page 14: 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081619/60fadc596d316e09cc6cf302/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Theorem(Routing Control on an(
nm
)NW )
For any (hi0, hi1
, . . . , him−1) ∈ Zm, the translating quantity is able to
achieve the routing capacity of the`n
m
´
combination network, where the
following two conditions are satisfied:
• 1 ≤ hik≤ h for k = 0, 1, . . . , m − 1,
•m−1X
k=0
hik= n.
14
![Page 15: 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081619/60fadc596d316e09cc6cf302/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
An Example:(73
)NW
• (n, m) = (7, 3) ⇒ (N, h) = (7, 5)
• {a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6} : Seven 1/5 symbols
3
source node
0 2 5 6
7
sink node
1 3 4
h0 h3 h5
Figure 14: (h0, h3, h5) satisfies the two conditions of the
theorem
{h0, h3, h5}{1, 1, 5},
{1, 2, 4},
{1, 3, 3},
{2, 2, 3}.
15
![Page 16: 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081619/60fadc596d316e09cc6cf302/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
An Application for(
nm
)NW with multiple source nodes
• An`n
m
´
NW with k source nodes
n
m m
m
n
source node 1 source node k
Figure 15:`n
m
´
NW with k source nodes
k ×n
n − m + 1≤ m
⇒ Routing Capacity of the`n
m
´
NW with k source nodes =kn
n − m + 1.
16
![Page 17: 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081619/60fadc596d316e09cc6cf302/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
An Example:(73
)NW with two source nodes
•`7
3
´
NW, i.e., (n, m) = (7, 3) ⇒ (N, h) = (7, 5) for each source node.
• The routing capacity = kn/(n − m + 1) = 14/3 ≤ 3 = m
• {a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6} : Seven 1/5 symbols from the souce node 1.
• {b0, b1, b2, b3, b4, b5, b6} : Seven 1/5 symbols from the souce node 2.
3
source node 1 source node 2
0 2 5 6
7 7
sink node
3 41
Figure 16:`7
3
´
NW with two source nodes
17
![Page 18: 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081619/60fadc596d316e09cc6cf302/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
An Example:(73
)NW with two source nodes
• (i0, i1, i2) = (0, 3, 5) : the No. of intermediate node connected the sink.
• (h(1)0 , h
(1)3 , h
(1)5 ) = (3, 3, 1): the number of 1/5 symbols from the source node 1.
• (h(2)0 , h
(2)3 , h
(2)5 ) = (2, 2, 3): the number of 1/5 symbols from the source node 2.
• h(1)i + h
(2)i ≤ 5 holds for all i = 0, 3, 5.
3
source node 1 source node 2
0 2 5 6
7 7
sink node
3 41
3 3 1
2 2 3
source node 1source node 2
Figure 17: (3, 3, 1) + (2, 2, 3) = (5, 5, 4) ≤ (5, 5, 5)
18
![Page 19: 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081619/60fadc596d316e09cc6cf302/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Conclusions
• We have shown the method of Routing Control on the`n
m
´
Conbination Network as an
theorem.
• We have shown the application of Routing Control for the`n
m
´
Conbination Network with
multi-source nodes.
19
![Page 20: 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081619/60fadc596d316e09cc6cf302/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Point of Proof of the Theorem(Routing Control Theorem)
• For example, we consider`7
3
´
NW, i.e., (n, m) = (7, 3) ⇒ (N, h) = (7, 5)
• {a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6} : Seven 1/5 symbols, which are generated on the souce node.
from the source to the sink via each intermediate node.
• Cyclic shift transfer; Ti = {ai, ai+1, ai+2, ai+3, ai+4} from the source node to the
intermediate node of No. i.
3
source node
0 2 5 6
7
sink node
1 3 4
h0 h3 h5
Figure 18:`7
3
´
NW
20
![Page 21: 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081619/60fadc596d316e09cc6cf302/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Point of Proof of the Theorem(Routing Control Theorem)
• (i0, i1, i2) = (0, 3, 5) : the No. of intermediate node connected the sink.
• (h0, h3, h5) = (1, 3, 3) : the number of 1/5 symbols which are translated from the source
to the sink via each intermediate node.
No.i a0 a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 a0 a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 a0 hi
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0
→ 0 • ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ 1
3 • • • ◦ ◦ 3
5 ◦ • • • ◦ 3
→ 3 • • • ◦ ◦ 3
5 ◦ • • • ◦ 3
0 ◦ ◦ • ◦ ◦ 1
→ 5 • • • ◦ ◦ 3
0 ◦ • ◦ ◦ ◦ 1
3 • • • ◦ ◦ 3
For any (i0, i1, i2) and (hi0, hi1
, hi2), there exsits at least run of 7 black circles in the table.
21
![Page 22: 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081619/60fadc596d316e09cc6cf302/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Routing Capacity of an(
nm
)NW
C
m
C=n /(n-m+1)
C=m
n
1
1 n
O
Figure 19: Routing Capacityn
n − m + 1of
`nm
´
NW
22
![Page 23: 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081619/60fadc596d316e09cc6cf302/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
An Example ( h = 2 )
• N : the number of 1/h symbols which can be translated from the source node to all the
same sink nodes by routing ⇒ N = 3
• N/h : the achievable routing quantity of symbol of the network ⇒ N/h = 3/2
a, b, c
a, b b, c
a, b
a, b, c
c
b, c
a
a, c
c a
a, b, c
S
1 2
3
4
5 6
1/2 symbols
Figure 20: h = 2, N = 3 and N/h = 3/2
23
![Page 24: 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081619/60fadc596d316e09cc6cf302/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
An Example ( h = 3 )
• N : the number of 1/h symbols which can be translated from the source node to all the
same sink nodes ⇒ N = 4
• N/h : the achievable routing quantity of symbol of the network ⇒ N/h = 4/3
a, b, c, d
a, b, c b, c, d
a, b, c
a, b, c, d
c
b, c, d
a
a, d
d a
a, b, c, d
S
1 2
3
4
5 6
1/3 symbols
Figure 21: h = 3, N = 4 and N/h = 4/3
24
![Page 25: 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081619/60fadc596d316e09cc6cf302/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
An Example:(42
)NW
a, b, c, d 1/3 symbols
a, b, c b, c, d c, d, a d, a, b
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5
Figure 22: N = 4 and h = 3
25
![Page 26: 組合せネットワーク上のルーティング制御とその応用Network Routing and Network Routing Capacity R. W. Yeung, “Two Approaches to Quantifying the Bandwidth Advantage](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081619/60fadc596d316e09cc6cf302/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
An Example: Routing Control
b, c, d c, d, a1 2
2
b, c, d c, d, a1 2
2
b, c, d c, d, a1 2
2
bb, c
b, c, dc, d, ad, a
a
case1: (1,3) case2: (2, 2) case3: (3, 1)
Figure 23: (h1, h2) = (1, 3), (2, 2), (3, 1) for the sink node of No. 2
26