Central Pattern Generator
-
Upload
renz-l-salumbre -
Category
Documents
-
view
1.153 -
download
4
description
Transcript of Central Pattern Generator
Renz L. Salumbre
4BIO-6
CENTRAL PATTERN GENERATOR
Definition
Generally, a central pattern generator is a lattice of neurons that functions for the
production of recurring output. Or in other words, it generates repetitive patterns.
Specifically, it is a small neural circuit in a ganglion that specifies the particular motor
output pattern for a number of physiological systems or structures for a particular
behavior pattern; it also accounts for the modulation observed moment-to-moment,
which, in turn produce several different physical actions depending on the needs of
the animal. The theory of the central pattern generator shows that there is a basic
rhythmic pattern produced in these networks, which basically translates to observable
behavior such as locomotion.
A central pattern generator, or generally rhythmic generator, have the following
attributes: Two or more processes that interact such that each process sequentially
increases and decreases; and lastly, that, as a result of this interaction, the system
repeatedly returns to its starting condition.
Below, the following diagram exhibits a typical central pattern generator in the
muscles of the wings of crickets. Central pattern generator is precisely the reason and
the working mechanism behind the characteristic pulse rhythms in the songs of
crickets generated in the meso-thoracic ganglion. A command signal is produced in
the brain that basically sets the central pattern generator going. Once started the song
pattern behavior is produced by the output of motor units from the central pattern
generator.
Properties of Central Pattern Generators
It has been shown above that what characterizes central pattern generators is
their two or more processes which sequentially decreases or increases and the
resulting interaction happening in the generator returns the structure to its
starting condition.
Role in Behavior
Central pattern generators may explain the usual functions of some organisms.
As is aforementioned, the pulse rhythm songs of crickets are generated by the
action of central pattern generators. Other activities such as swimming, moving,
walking, running or flying account for the importance of central pattern
generators. These activities have also been shown to have been modified in
response to sensory feedback.
Some Examples of Central Pattern Generators
Central pattern generators are gaining a momentum in research owing to its
fascinating properties in how it can rationalize simple rhythmic activities which
men tend to ignore and always taken for granted (such as chewing, etc.). Recent
studies however indicates the growing enthusiasm regarding central pattern
generators and these studies are quietly establishing the importance of making
such studies while delineating the possible consequences of such undertakings.
For example, it has been shown that central pattern generators modify the
behavior of Lymnea stagnalis by converting the pattern generators for feeding
into pattern generators of egg-laying. Also, some studies concern themselves in
localizing the central pattern generator, take note for example the findings that
suggests spinal circuitry in humans has the capability of generating locomotor-
like activity even when isolated from brain control, and that externally
controlled sustained electrical stimulation of the spinal cord can replace the
tonic drive generated by the brain.
Conclusion
Central pattern generators are neuronal structures that forms lattice-like
structure that accounts for the rhythmic or the usual physical functions such as
walking, swimming, chewing, etc. The complexity of these generators are evident
as they are widely distributed among the Earth’s inhabitants. The existence of
such generators has great implications in understanding human life. Whereas
some philosophers would say that we learn thru habit will be proven correct;
conversely, some existential philosophers that deny the possibility of such
dependence on structure might perhaps make a suggestion almost trying to
enact Leibniz’s monads.