Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

44

Transcript of Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

Page 1: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

Ccmr of Tiomm

CaseNo. SCIl" ' , ■)

JUN 2 1 2011

State, of

On PeMHon.Fcr 'ArihoF Error (

For Frotecfive Orders Concerning ElevenHn

re Cast No.

PETITION FOR WRIT OF ERROR COfcAM

But Mars.. L,

R-3ifbv-il ft

Page 2: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

TNTTRODUCrCOH

P<eKhcner C"£cre"), 3 YrsuclulenHij and o-Wherioi.se toromj Fully

Ccnvic|-c<p( priscoer O'nA&r ^<rnt-er?ce. of deat-k , iravma bzcn

m\sio?ormcd t>-^ His cou-rl" S7ss-j'one4 counsels (/VKS'3 Cb. U*?

soenhs ) gboovf- fr-be «v??i{;?bi'l<>u oP fhi-S feor>eda -^ncf recenH<j

si is coven'n<a c-VVicrtoise, res^cfFufU -peh'Wens tr><5 Oou/-l" br ^

iAirihof error coram rtohis ccncerninQ ei>her +he diiVech 3fpe^| |rc

i Na. SCC5 -JS^^) in <»ore v^^

s?r fcr crher relief ??oJU5+ic

NiorcoM for rMiv^g&r^rE fftorECrrvd

neccss-irM to t>coVcc|- +V>e juristief-i'crj a? "V-\nis Co^'b "hi cure

fr^ud 3r issut, tchich is Cc-rrenH^ codec srf-hzck b'^

1-he. Ch-57 siaeofs, efraA, aeekvn^ to b^vt Sere. senYtoatek ft> iiTe

6r iiedared rnenhait^ incompetent- 10 federal cocci- - eitloec of

of evidence be has cjv

iViem sncl wrcn^PaJ jud^emeofe- Penhooef fes^ec

44-tis Ooorh to issue ?n immedishc p^chechve order scct^finy i

severei«r>fu ^noi/cr ord«n'nA tV»e

d desist".<

ix»-3? -3elected b^ A^'s Oi-2^ s/genf 'DsocVio, u>h«i C

off of tici-e's C32>"e gfVc^ sy|>pi^nW/i^ his execlj^fcr^ frcst, oimms i'a

OS&C Sccthernbtstnch §4^-5^ 3chon, N*. di -22 S

"to ecs^end h> (Scrti- b;'u,eek(u le

Page 3: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

TABLE. OF CONTENTS

CASE HrSTORV FACTS

CLACM. *

/WEALS HAVE BEEN. AND CONTTNUt TO BTL U

BV FMO^ULENr AmiWEV MCSCOMbiJCr

.STATE ACTDftS AHb AGENTS, ERABLE.5 B'f i-CWER

"ERl?oK£oas •mcojf^ES ytr trcal AMD rrn

TO CfcKbOCr NELSON XM^OrRrES AND TO .SU«SfTTOT€. THE

Cocttr ArfocMTBb coonsels, in vzciArroH of <5cr^'3

Fri^sr Sixth, eighth, ano FDUforeNTH ^men©, KrsHrs IS

a.) Sbfpfessi&n of 1AK6E 6iacW Eeelskjn Address Beck" &

b ) S'i>ppres.ii'd**\ o? Gxculpgfive Lab /4o31^.5is 'Referh fS

C .) Soippres^n of M6F& Getoelru Xmpoc-nd "Reccipr" 23

, Trial CecrV Refused +o Cbodoct- Hejscn

3, Fr^wdulenV- -*5ufpiement^h'on ef 'Record

B. fiubvePSfon aP /41I Collateral "Remedies 30

1, rSVgte's Goc)Ciny &rady VfoiaKcns 31

JZB Custodial ExhsrHcn 31

3. -Tudae Millers Failure, io Chnduch tieUofi I

'S Ch, -1

C

Page 4: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

CASE HtSTQRV TACTS

u On fMprch £\, 1990 (moft than X ^esrs .3*fer #tf 155

is i>oefu t*as dUscGNeced ), PeHHeoer C'&cre")

M* Sfm kscie For srrrvied Cot»ber^ *?ndi murdl.«r oF M

s incttofecl

To 1995 Gere to-as Ccnviciccl oF boHa Counts and ^enhrnceci t

Jydqc*vienVs t^ere reverscrA for observed, -presecu-h??sal

,' Gore, v-Stake, ?IH S&.3A. 119^ C tta

rec«ivedl ssme. judgements on

toere ^

Tn

r, 2Ac))

On /^«aosf i^ ,£001 C sffer CCRC-S Heal kofVce scceph!t4

Vhen conflicted oCFcasc^Judct Leslie K

3FVer conflicted oFF c-ase,cihno •pre-e

jit-, cJudae'Koi-henbercj improperly appoints Steven '_.._

gs SubsHK>hL counsel to +3ke./AcnoUs f

Eh m^gcs be cf relevance. lootHiu o? no'res {Screws cbjech"cn-5 io

Ocdler sfpoin-Hn^ McbuPrce C«wbo hati onsaccessFuUjj prcs-ecv.»he^K "

_ 3ticX OuPreevs noHct or

sU S«err\ 4o have Wen eracJ.ic^hiaL Hs maM be fekvant- ha "H-

i55f^!T^ a^ GVi.3.7 srQenVs l\3mooer, bon«^Ho, 3n<i noss'teddSeher, botK

booohc tctire empioy-ees of M.r. ba'Pcee -ah ;

'Donobe ix>cof" "to

n oF --^U records hvs bezr> c

hJ

Page 5: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

"Hne sid cF "Du"Pre<t\s Former crnpic.<jec- -Hntir- ccUeacue-lVUliSSa Mj'/vsfcf

benoho £Who faisclu 3co;jc4 £©«x c? c?fmes -. Riycra y. «S>egfre,,*SC40-9 57<>'«i .)

On June 18 t3LOCSL -Hr?e Ch.A? a^enks File, an im^crwssibit shell

ie>"Hen for pcstccnvi'ch'on. felieF- The ooch'on v&a.^ boH->

On October 5.1,^003. an appeal of 4-he stnkinq i©as fiicd.

CourV- ordefeci gr\ senmded ^ostzoovtdricn be Piled toi

, and diiatcc^j

ciaim clrsfV-s^ in^ish'nc Ac se-nhence

aaenVii rUed -fVic»> adversarial, .s

-f-ion +ti Srrave (Sere declared ment-giliA inc

Cbse^vinq fVie Si<jcUinq of Scre'-s ioiwpi&s Hadi vissblu cUssip^ta

the prsceedi^a?^ ^nci ccwjmencii'na C^cfe en his l»'^e eF

in^ op ^y.

On «Juoe Di ( 5.00H -

, Judye. Miller fl^nd (Sc^-i compet-en h

cts. refused

I a

.^7 ^cenh-s f(!«;!

ended poskcnui^c^i'cn mzHcn i-obick.

i^s Ga-e. insisted be preyen^ec!,

in fbe Cccnh-j. jsii.. He j.45 be-??-Ven for "Vhe vie.u.-inq fie-asc/c c-P

iirrci- ;'v • ■'"'^ Mcot c{ in h-7il i^'y'^.j

Page 6: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

\z.

13.

i/yimcdia|-cl*j ccunt-ectcJ by Piling te fi^f wicHon

tment cf sukshfr-ite cc^^sei.

Co Ju\u a6, 5OOH s £«asA' itetscn hearing lobs held whereto

Jm^* jVHUer Mediated tint dispute A>eWer» 6bre tenks insishid -the ^cilf-^.sc

pd , (Sore insisted. tf,c^ iOert net" and t

•fhe prejudicial pfeincU'ch deivj iss^t, CisimX, had

SUppiernertel iOiHn fsc+cal subsh f +H p^jdi

+3ined-w'Viich retired SraVcs %7y

be -pre^cnhrcl» J"w^e Miiier directec? OiBiri X i?e

gnd (Bore eondihon-dlij icitViclfci^ his rv,ch"on pfc

PfGSecored -properlu , Ch.57 sgenfts then r

"to •prescoh^t Cisii-n X Si*U

sus -pj

CVslM X

On

Claim X SwPple

/4/lGc fUcd -Hie S

6 Cln,

+o

i (§brc'-s| On September i>, ^OCH

presence for «j he^rinoi upon ~H^e. SVsbevs response w\nepe

h4 had told Sore, c\gii^s and materiality i^ereto Wsgce

in

x± Ht competency proceedings -.Judge Miller had besrd Frcm the

jcK, Doctors that (Sore had related to them the C'b.a5/-

enhs Wad Sooobt to have Gcrt declared \nc

esr ^ef:lasab "U* property present- taii cl^»^>e br.

igr, 't'eshficci 6ore toa-y cle^rty cempet-enf. br»

U--. f rf- ^t-^/He SchcMf^^^e-cf benches test"i'Fu*o(., v> p*irVi'-c

(3orc toria ciUs'SsH^'^'cfl bcc3U:j£ "Wtcm reFuscT-1 to N

]?'!*»cVc eetski'n ^cVdrcs's

:cr--i> cenfact cI bet 3use & cot-itvmtd p.

Page 7: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

It" is chid.e-sr VKjh^\- cxrcrrcrd 5?r "Hot bcsrina -jbwt^lt is very

te&f what dtal not:- Xh fe\ev3nr part; Hit Ch.37 ggenbs

olid nor 5?rate 3 lack of -previous ccunseis files ncr, -Hit

material]by c? (3cre\s tyHR6E black eeiskin s?depress book A^\

hi" IS sopofessicn as a ^racly violation.,, As a result" of "Hie

ino all cf <3-cre*s ac'sH" pbuse rtl-gfed--? claims log re .sc

/&.

C CAC gf Spencer besrina ) 5'urvjved

On October J12, 300^ - f/nmediabdu s?ffer leafninne

p j

T~icol-3f- (3-cre filed Y\\s y>p-c se mcHon for

d railed +o -Present" evidence \r\ jauffcrhof claims ^od re

d io present- Aiccitabit sf<jufr»eofcs "ho s^vt Ciaifvi X in p^

"iro

y

sod /cr +o renew fyic+fon fbr .sub^

of Co

On Ocro.ber 55^, ^00L\-- immediabciy g'Ffer

inhs LOere p\le<^ - Cb..S7 SKsenhs fi'ied +heir motion to

pel t-beir Ccnpedersre, Ch, ^'7^ o?cj«soi- to prediucc Record

Conv^nienH'ji bea^n cisiAo^oa i-brsj never received. If i

rbe

On October 5?, 5G0M sJlui^c Miller convco^d 3

-3^ beiievec{ was "ro be •£« yjcison. ioq^i

iAfcs. of ^e CcV. 3:2. /vjetjen * ,

Ccorh cVgiroecl "to be urrau^rc of the. j7.'cH se mo He a

ccnccrnfna hbs

i

| '' ' lcF tc

O? (Acre's LAKGH- hi&cVc eo:iskir> 5»cWftiS book

Page 8: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

19 The Od-cber £7-, £ooLl be;?nna uas ivH-le. mere

Tap, ScV- For Sere U, the. //IS- s?od her Gh.^7 ^

(Ssre ink) repeafincj bi^ refusal +o sUouc CV».a7 scen

access to rccortAs in iWir cenfecWrshi Cln.27 sraenl-

posessicn and -fa tncSuee. /eceree 6ore inbo

Hu in "i-beir fraudioien'r records dcbdd±r as i

3 farce

4 trick'

fullu elsetohert loereiogftcr, Sore to-JS coder

•fhe bearin g to 3 Tieison in^uirj rgarclin^ 1^5c

compiainhs * The iiloscfM effect- of making sh s^

refuse?^ vfe qive CV\',2*t scents acccs.s'^to trig I

Fi'les hsol ^ Jl t fA( ^ +

3cre-

cr » ci is in the

ZO, The court" clcsfU teccanuccl +Vic ff3uduVdnV oleFcnse

Z£ WtfV ^e ^/?«ir ^// we arc dainv is sciUnj up a ttccrdjir

CCh.27 SQcntsl defense £it> Geres ftvse ccmfainfsJ say//

fft V ^ot ^>?«e ^?c£^/ records*" iOct.ar *

added )

*P/eaS£ note ; (Sere hadt never priorly beard Cin.a7

l h+ h d fn'l ( fil Cl

e ; (S py ^

+0 have recerved fn'al coon.se(s files- Clever. He.

(io\~ 00 i4oe l»V>e in +hc ver^ Wtjinmm of ^ah hc^rioa

Hammer rviakcs 1-he abscrdl clssm i-he Fvrs^1r<v>e.. Once 6cre is

CO *W>e it me be is led to sdl^vnh his refusal +0 alle

ss "to records in Tasscnels pescssfon ^uh\ch he

| "the "privilcacd. rvja+erjats^enerahxi b^ CC-R h

be oseel ^q-ains)- hi»v« i"to rccpen co^pehtnt^ yroccecli'jgs or +0

incrfr^<'n3^ b:!M b-^"-'viiH<jah"cn c,f cKmts he has iacr'Ce^AtlH'eci >,

jie ha^ 00 ides Hs^^^vi sb.-5.crJi cvBi'm h*.* bee/* j^gje ontai ri~

is resVahccty ^ohicb cer*p*\s (Son 'hi 3-ilouG ^n H

Page 9: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

On Iccemhcr 2% 2004 at the close of a hearing, On.ZV 319 enh;

filed an smended witness KsK~

On Janua^ 12., 5.005 -even though he had already

Sore 3 completed copy of *h>e alleged inventory - Ch.2?

Tssnone -Tiled 5 motion far exteosidn oF i\>fb ^refa

( ^1+hoc^h net- rctev^ni- -here, Tssscne u>-<as merely

bifiabie hoars 1o bis re^_ocsVs for p^eol-fcy federal ccuri"

On A?ni /3,.

3O

+bc postconvicHon <vj&-Hon. ^

, 5005 to File -+Vit gnffcipa^ meften .

M«4 16,^005 heari^a, CW.^27 ^jeot^ Failed (rcrusod) ^o Filt

g moWn H soypiemeni-. <Sore gdvisecl coorf Vic h^ |>rav(al«<^

3 sei~ oF V)sndu,riHco, Psctoallu sufficient,

C\si(v\s +V->eu Were rcfasin^ "h> |>rescoK

Ch.S'F s^enhs bad or alwaus h«el s/^cesis to tint Filtsi^ «-^ ^^

of trial counsel snd/oc records in Tasscot'-s fosession \s 6oithi'n

4<nendled ooskonvicVi'eiD oioHoo y filed on JwneC!,20CH ^nd Hie

^fr>€nded 60itr»ess \\&K The 3,851 motion clams iriai cecnsel tx>3

3 Cocsine seldicV- 3nd docomenhs dervionsfrahn^ such were prese

Tncse clcccments catvit frcr* Bos * t, geneva Pile' l.ishrd en p. i of

■fhe \nvenhifa Tassooe glided I mi pecpared* /.»kcu.Jse, -Hnc h'shWj ef

W6*wao Porpcrted to be (Sores faHn^r-s fj'rse wife, Saodra Ctaxten, oA

ss listcoold have colu cc^ie from the materials Ta«ooe. Ksd if

didnt have trfBl ccunsets Piles. 6cce haci never |n«^ cf her «

e, fibre had never tieard ef Ms-Schewr, lis-hrd, but- See:fn.?, //j/na.

Page 10: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

25,

.24.

incomprehension cT the crossover d3ims. (Sere -+V>en ivicHooeci

?<Mjrl" +0 Ccr^pei Tsssone +d provide £cre cr-uciai olccumenfcs

open tVyc inventory We sMlecjedly prepared, J^dyc Miller

cl Hj order Tsrssooc fo -provide. (3-crt crucial dec

t/oas ecmp^HtcA bu "hSe Pcccacina to Pi tc tohat toas

habeas peHfion b^ fhi^ Ccuri". (tSee: ^ore v. TlaStatutes Ch.3*f,

C iO, eC-a/*, *JI3 So.^W 596 Cff^-^005 ) denied w/out- opinion ) The hope-

to Coivjptl /carasc Oh.37 ^enVs ( lijmmer ) h> present" crossoverp ^ p

3nd Clarsscne) to prcvVcle the crucrai decomenhs. Tine

pefihon !aj3S Piled Mvi\3i,lC0S &ad denied 33t 2.005.

Co JTunc ^4 ,ZOCS - to\VV» Ch. X7 j^ente fefusin^ 4-0 present even

crossover c\3Ai"r>s ihz^ Ceouircd no more +b^n -VV^e. trial record

to pceseoV C;>o\VVi -jdveoVof Missouri y, Sfcbert ) .- <^oTe sVtem^h

eol +0 file 3 •prefechve f 2ZSH peHhor> in SodMn Hcrula USOC

ltsroiriscrcl Fir Wck cf* ^Ahsushon -ccrHFi.caht

on /4pn! 57, J2OC6 Cosca No. O&li&OH »

On or abcut- tTwne ^, -2OO5 - fcarina <Tu<Aac Miller'^ sllocotn^ Hie

frsud to pl^M ouh b^ ionorina (ScrcVpro secernp(a{

Tb mttst be noted : Gere or^ovVwna\xX^ tttd T^sscne. he needed -jfltxr ati*~

his education records tr> expose Donchc-3 threap CS«: (Screws «7FfYctavi>

piled WoVi-2M#200H ) -HnaV if <3crc persisted in scre^n^ op herde<H toith

St-sr^ net to ptcseccVe vcos-. misceocioct" cWinos »r» excfog.i«je For a hlc

Sentence i+Y3f iUiculd ca^i-e life. &'cn^nce in eHner case, en same

tOiihncssCes) to enso.'e recjfenm^ cf ccmpeirnc^

One of tVicse Fr^adoienh toifnes^es is tbt (Vls.Scbemsr li'sted ca

s 1 isV- <Scfe never cyHenc^cA snu hushjschoci in

Page 11: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

3O.

failina to ecnduct" « Tictscn in<jo\ru - rcPusioa to ccmpej Tsssooe to

povide Gore crucial documents, r^cccsssrij hi demonsfr^K /expose,

f-he records debacle, Prsud <smd fraudulent- intent-o? Vskinj "Hot

Ms.Schemer - (Sore Piled s ^csevnoKcn seekiVia fo

e McUer.

A\r /4uQust" OH, £0O5 hearing Juctae Mi'Uer denied receipt" aF

prc v*se mchon hsr his 4is<jualificaHon -sod reset- \hc

poor dauG Imbcf, ord&rio<^ Cscrt to ^ive+ht mcKon Vo

pax +o Vhe coofb

On /4uqost- 08T, 5.005 +■© no avail, (^ore aVh:mphcci lo expose.

Co.5.7 aqenfe +V^rcgV- and fraud a? Ms-Schemer-tb act-Goort-

ft> require Ch/^-7 SQeote "fosipecipu wVrsh the witnesses open +r>c

Itsh koere going H 53a, <Ne sVtcn^pbed -hi b^ve coor^

conduob ^ rtdson \nooitu,3o he cootci demcrjshrak- "Hoc fraod <sF

t4->e records debacle^ hy shctx>\n<j +be moKco +o scppienacoh'osa.s

not" Piled on s ooraber oF elavrvis -H-ighcifdl noh re^ocrc in-iore.

CeovEAC on fai lore -H> 3-eetc suppression o? st3f~e^ients oa -

"fsch'c ) - thos/to prove -+he claf/vi cf Uck

defense a^-a-insV- (Sores jp/c

Corpiainhs in Uu bad C-See-,

S

records f/oss a •pr

Coropiainhs -in Uuht- of records

r +han ccodoct- -Hne tooacverdue Hdscn incjj

qave Gere +he opKoo o? self rep fescnVsHcn he

Gore could nob ^FFcri pin^ncisllu ( Frcm CcA-.^ZccH

f^i. pas 2.7-2%) nzr Ujpllc^ - Prom bis refasaj ~b

Tgss'on»e "fo p^ovtc-le ciocomenhs -loena^e in, or \ -hi

back snd s\!oco Ch.a7^5eohs -Vo |>erpehr3t-e VV7ei> fraud,

Page 12: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

1.

-i;

8.

prospect of Cb. 27 ^oeots perpetrating +W Nis.Sdrverwcr

1~o scouire S7bsciohe control to perpetrate, sod Force. tV>eir

I deal 601 th SVahe, setors open bfnn (See: Fn.

reoo\cecl/cempeked. +d

protect his inrerests in his

Only after <JZ,idae Miller refused. to recuse and denied Gore's

October 5^,5.004 f>ro <se motion out cf hand - faiUnQ to Give 6

a dtot yjehon. loooiru god. Fair oppechjnitu h> demonstrate,

cf cconsd - (Sore.y-spaced loitfo tt->e.

rrossover

Miller denied +he posteonv»ct?"OAOn Seyhcm^er 13,2005

On Ocfobtr 10,2005' Ch>27 sfoenhs Tiled notice cF &ffej 1

c/ai'tflu kecjgn dilsfcra f^cf-ic,. cisTforoa +ha record had nor

H-fsnscrikedl. (.<§£&% Sealed documents lr\ 0S5»C He. OS .2171-5 -c

Sei tz -"the record w^s transcribed <5nd cohered +Htft. ondercsesit in

is Quite pecbabie.

Miller tV^3^C1r).■27 3<qents refused 4t) ccnoiocp ^ufclrc fccccd& U

Ti*on Sod boastec( of tier 3'ctvjn('gj^i, cihnQX3«»yTJbr/A Y<«3&z6re^ "ha £

h^s nc naht+o e'FPechve sssistance. C^ee.-.Oct-.T?,1.qqh. trans-p-

* Mjiief fyj^H have F)ipflcpped sod failed. t& conoioch "Actscn \m

under mistaken Welief &c\c had no right hi suck an ingoir^ a

'g/70^c <Sere cencedes he usaived. CbiV^ TV he never

Pfrst place, ^oweve^ as demcostr^tec^ t'r> Pehbooerj

soF

e£~oi> s tGcrc. iuinQ to hfr^ sbccr/id^tej^isi content oP records

POsessed,, 'Tines, his waiver bu dei^JU5 Poundl by ibis Csort- s>s

w , inteluacrtr Ac i

ea

records. not"

ila

Page 13: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

3S.

iG,

On Odrober XT^OOdT Gore ft ted a f>ros<t Federal habeas

5 massive appendix of exhibits O)E*1 ) in Gore, y.

L tf Corrections, Secrioern Florida UsbC No, 06-22736

/As AAGr M-5.*/* aqeoRS iv(3SSone,ee-6f.; sV Other CSSe i^erc f»3Viq

"t~o warrsni", llsntfliec- <s?nd bcr»cbo'.s deceptive and cliitah5!*-ci

ios of fciani'^Q recced to-j.s ne^r prepared "pete is fed, ( Mete.: it~

jffrcr ^cre'^s yn> se efforhs -

3 trench *a "Tassonejs T-s&ttniek efforts

\hc HOA here---)

On "FekruSMj 0^,2009 -Hnis Coort- held Oral /Arguments in SCOSit-Hg.

Xn rclcv^nV pprh, Hie Jusbees cyt^.-essecH concerns <?s tb +V>e O\. 1Z7-

jenhs refusals h> focus upon eAcui^ahjrM issues Sa-t insisted open.

a

Xn Feb.iOO^+he Shal"el5 ccst-cclisl Copw Service fee exhsrKon .sc

(5eex Smith ~y. t>.O>C. , Sc.^ol C i Dca

oV hs JwaqeMiiier on Cc^.^^OO^ ( Hesrn

<f ndlec^onfeTteHna Gcrcis access to fhc court" a© fsr -jis such

been one fn&\c\~- obstacle> X"n ssrne mco'Hn Gore sen-hj fieticco!"

»Hon of empioumcnl" 'ft) Cin.^.gqenVs C^ <3H of +fiem \oV J \ . . , ll.il" 1 ■ i i") d.ervignaiOQ t-io?M cease ^nd desisr rro/v\ g\{ &\'eoea f

3cnYin<iS u Tneu c?!t rerused to be ri/rea soa Conh'oo'ea.

Xn relevant" p^r^ •Hrst' «20d>6 append fx' ccnhss.is evidence in

t" ef crossover cl^im^ Gh,^^ ^uenhs ^zlw^^.s had orctccis "fc

to present "hi save qc»l^ phase cUi/v).-> ja stsfe proceedin^' ■ t ^

•fubi»c record msbenals ana 6ohicK yceve, )5radv and (xigtic

V10I3H0OS ■piead.ecx as SobcUsi'p'i.s csf C<3i:">aX ,5:3 .'>oj>piemcn!-ed<.^na

other cletMS. Thea si^ptu rcfttsc ^b uHti^e. 6brcrs cvi'cience- cind

tjp fcr- /V\G- +0 pi^cseot" ^ tic reel io f\i" F^ise evsilence.J

Page 14: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

«

t

fber +h<t GoorK-s concerns tuere. prompted hy the record or

Seres leffcr fOcci <3nd eircqbM dsf^s jiner +d Oral Arjumznts

Gcorl tVien asked bonobo ooheHner there uns c7ncj evfeten

H'3XM Support" for c7om claims fojushFtj d

csieranaed and t>u luinq fo the Cccrf- sfa-Hna +herc utas nc

yfdienHarM su^perfc- for sou ef 6?coc's ciai/vis. ~"Cl7o^e: i

for Stage's cushsdist exh^rhen ^F ^i'-e, he Mould h-sve accepted Jadj

31.

refusing -h> focusTrue 4© her frickvS, Doneho s

;pon the issues (>cre insiskdi be +he e

cd to jush'fy her inscieni" refusal *fe proseccfe ex

H H(Sere loiHn He. was u

On June this Obor!~ dented +he spfesi, (Sore

On lu 15,-2009 faced toitfn 3 letter cf thread fc^ Donebc (<oV-H<ch

tt> iniscatcoia|-e. ItVii^ah^ns ^cicd exacHg ^s -sVie. hao( dc/)e in

ClNUdcUe. Fla. )) "b fnVerfere WnVhv>

se habeas effcrh in Fctieral court-,

McHcn far Afp t" cf SpcciaHuSeiected anf

therein

)

the. fceovd \n SCiO-WU demensfrsh^s, in relevsrnV-pr?r^. there

is an abondgnce of evidence Ce<;. £><?pc. cf Mi'Vct beCor3; hcivuci'de-

cJieWc+-ive cf ibis case. ") +0 ifreFutehlu prove elates here. ^eCcc-^.

5h'on <3^~ H->e Wb reporf, suj\tehto^ of evidence., snd

of Gores lARGC biacK- eels*oV> address )ncck. Had the

PoMic reccri c^efo been scoaht" in ^CC3 *wVvin ^rt advised ■Hnc«^v

Tasscne toas lot^*^ afcoct- ib ccr^enis, Ciaino X Couid have bec/t saved.

Theu \oo \vca aboot -Vhe b* Cc^s tevelafians iti G

it

Page 15: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

HO,

13,

On vjulo

U to sist' \n c^ennenstrahoa tbe/1/4G-'s

l«sb report- Sii^pci "to recced.en direct- apf<i^i c, y,

"Hrie AAG filec^ response Cl)^*^^) o^posina s^i'di moticn ■s.nd

roN <TF HER CH..27/A^RNr -under

Op

Qn 8epk.not.er 18;^OO9~ in vure. 6errcr - (Sere presented his

pro ^e Q/yicnckeJL claims Lbt^HS ) <gn<d -fht. Falsified tab

fe pert" CSopp. DE *" HH }. The. amended, olat'ons ccm peebens?veU

emcostr3tc_ pal'siFic^h'on cF ¥n'at repcrh ihs soppcession,oVnerI'll'

Vsolshions C<?9« rei (3creis WR&E. Uezck stress t>ook)

loiafionS C eot te-. false Jetoettu ti-ieft" sUea-akcns

i'Deffechve. SSStsf^OCe cF 4ri3l counsel Cekfaiifna Ceonaiels f

i'oa SC^>pres.Sion d? stestenotnts ontsi^Fwiia <3bt-3ined ^oci in re.

ftf rule evuience") sndl sy

sod others coo feelers hzc{ ccnceal«r>eni- oF TuMic

ALL o? which siv^e ctesscrvet issues 3n<4 Culmin-iht 4

Sore,"" C^*st" ^c mention +heu implicate. M£ Ts^ardl cciitiri Falsn'Pic^tfc

ef the lab report" snc\ ccntro\l»o^ Ch.^7 ^aen-fcs fn CenctaloneoV

On Movember Off, ZOQC) \ht USDC aeof cut 3 ncKce. e?

\Df Nov.C9. &.CCy , Thouoh (?ci"e toas proceccunq prcsc i> l 7 f

oe never received the nch'ce cP

On November 09, '

7

- Jsj^cd gnd her Ch*27<yen■

5»/, /7c6e-: Ah Auy .C&/£GC£' bcarfna Gere inPcrroed

e Were, nc/nercus ^crcss'CYer'"1 issues H3»v>me

PpesenK Hammer &nd benohc failed Helena if,

Page 16: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

hijacked tV»e federal ^cfton From (Screws conVoU C /fcfct: J

toas ocf Counsel ©P reccrdi ~ H>e oeHce was net" .served open her b<j "Hit -

GletVc- Jet -She sHtncUd tbe bearing , tagiveol Gotvs. ^re^ence,

ber affcmhvienK Collusion is i/n|>h"c3fc<A on ibese Fschs )

is.

On 62, 5010 2>onoho submitted 3 mcKon fo sVaq ita

<Scre\s

3 mcch issae for anac)i locor^pejhent" (seHioa up

dtcficicnf" §225H jpeHHon Corvti-VHoa al( rc^or^ihiFa

support" R>r aoilt"phase rtUhcd c{s(ms ) *o»H> inbcrnal oooifen to

SuPpUot" Screts 7?A2 sc cistms. The cooct- -satscQccnK^ deter -

menhalU camocUnt^ but- tbt j>ivcj«c(i'ct ©f *7

AAQ-

Gor« nuroe^as pteacUnas cbj'cch'riQ io 3 Cb.^1? e

^ £ b b^Th Coocrc tbe K

On JwIl) 15,^010 Gore piled r>rs sc |>c.HHen fcr

relic? »n H^e EUvenVh Circgil- Cu5C/\ Ko. (OH359i-f )

"h> Compel Jjisfricl" Cbcch Jwdoe^ (srsb^rvq and ^

Torres Cs ccosin o? iTasn Torres jocA b^vici Resfoepc -SVabt. Uii^nascs J

•fo recuse 4-hernsei.\<LS snd for . Don.obo "k> be t^e/vicve^. T^«-

EUvenVK Circuit oienied -+V>t ^ehken bu Ofinjon (09-09-io)

Bore Vjss peKHooed For oerh \oof ih is net" ^efJ^^

r47-. On ^ccemter Si ^OlO - ba . rule- filed bts

ers /VfnencAec^ Nepi«^ *n -*-bis Oourf in

demonsV^sHoQ in reAevsobp^Hr- fhatAA&'$ On.Xf

in Dotb of Gores Crises h'3«--fc>ecn luinq «3boch +berc

nc evidence of, soci cencealfna 4-^e ex.csttr?ce eF

t-ARG£- btsck eef&Un <sdArtss book'-. Con Trelb.oH/iOO9 s(-Ofsl ""

/4ra. in SCDSl^4^ t>oocho dente-dl e>cishence- oF evidence.to0

(3

Page 17: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

verb claims - in dciCKX so, she denied 4?t btCora.

hah Would have eW>ecu>ise. sgveoi Ctatro X ^nd. the.

of Vial counsels faiiocc "U rclt'Kaate. Suppression of Wi/li'ams.

evidence, -as Uiell as cttoicd +V>e. evideoce.cF (Sere'5

fi>r coortsct for cosfodo

+d present suclo +o <suj>prei?.sCounseU

inclehrav-iinste. poio^, •Wjou^h a/3fer filing ^ncr>tcj/^ cF Ch.

Coocc^frnenf oF evidence s/od sobversfoa oF claims io "Htis

/M(3's C^.57 ^acoh poncho arrso^cd Por V>er laco school

&nd fafher cf ont of her children/ fcrnocr CCRC

AA& CK.X7 ^iienf Tadd SdneC +b hake her placets

"cccxxset'/©o -Hoe 9cder<?l habeas achen,^ 6ot-t has

Do ides i^haf is/has been acina Qr\ In --Moose yrcctedings. <;inct

Vtkf^r'* 2-ODV . except Hwh (sore, was ckhawMecJ compehcni-. C^6t:

I)ondho.s rcoucsHna Seder's sffoinhr»cnt- is exacH^ wbal- Tasieofccfcrxt 4o ■

Pt of his partner Christeyhcr Andersen onct -Vhe\r mu;ccr)dc•c^

in

6(\ March ^fe,^OU Sore Piled iJooiW

\n H?e OSCA . He ScoaVif- either fhe Jisirict coorh^ T

iled 'k> ^ecuse or fo fcoaovt Todld Scher. line p

dented b^ Opinion ef Ma

The rcrneclfgljortsc^icHcn cP is inj

IH.

ra

i Since. Vnc Feb-0^,5009 «opp)anf-3h'cn of (Sortis

claims X>Gnoho has never cccnrnMniczhd ua\M <X;re

j d^ his J?jtOee.k(u letais -+^3f- coded oaI«j

3 leader kw Scher dai'Mina bt ioas appointed ,

4o ^espend ^Vo (Serfs letters/dt<"aods* 1?eftAses4o bt fired*

Page 18: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

ClATbA ONE-1

APPEALS HAVE BEEK <ANt> doflUTNiUE. 1© JBIE UNFATFOY

ONDERMCNEb E>Y fRAUDUIENT ^TTORNey IMCSCdNbOCr BV

«T*T£ ACrOKS /ND /VfrENHS, ENABLED BV LOWER. CCUHT^S

£R*orsecus TAZujf>z.s At tkzal Awt> rH posrcoNvccrroN

TO

court /*pperNrei> coohsels/ th vcai/trroN or

, fitXtH. EX&HTH, y^tSD FOURTEENTH /WtENftMENF P.TSHTS

J)ue ha iHhe CompfexlVa of fhe self-conceal ina frs7ucl «?ncl iMpropi'iefu

sf issue snd iV'i- berefofcre evasion dr def«cHon as a Sio<juteriy dedx -

-A.

srHFice., sM-inouah sna one. or noort oF ff»c

relief "Hneu most- all be ipccsenhtd So as to foreclose on

intended escg^<i-from correcHcn.

Subversion of t>irec(r/4p|pe3l (aFfer rcfrisl

As Hlominst-ccl in +he Subsecfions herccf, Gere's direct appeal

u oncAerr»-ioe.ci bu :

s^ includina bat-ooi-liYvjiVcd fa :

of B-cczs lAflGt Bus.Kdahod Black Eedskin /cidrcssBook!

Suppression of Lab /n^lusis'Sgyott, and* MDP^

Triisl Cborhs refusal to conduct 3 Hetsofl inouif^,

OnPe'Hefed sopplenoeo^Han of record w/feUtTi'cd Ut f-

.■e. cp sppelis^cocn'sdl re, ^11 of "Hie i

IS

Page 19: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

A?\-cr Gore hiad been denied doe -process S* &*, and

iqbVs 3f frisl bu -+he ^obsequentiu ocHfned. su^psessions cF mater

i evidence/ his elircd- (and colbVersl ") appeals w>ere Ff^

SuioYerfed bu -fheir concealment cohere 4V»e record i£3s och

or able. +o be dleve|cpe4 fo^ +be(r successful

On March IA/I'3,1988 "Hie vehicle of f*{fsskobyn(^y/cJ{orKk

undledl in an accictanir iovesHashoa sFh?r bcioa

Gore. lAiitViin -tVie vehicle, was Gore\s leaHocrJacket oolnich

heldi his S*nall -htlephcnc took, C>/ote: ih go+uadu ^bcaidiVc been an

flcor k>Oc3rci or focndl cuV-sic\«. cF veVijcW) TV toas loom a ferial.

15.

1. SHzl-e\s viclsHons

a.) Suppression cf MK6-E BVack Eebkin Address Book

On XT, 19 his FBr m Kenfocka,6ore"js

ibusiness b\ack eelsWn oovcrecl scUress book,

noie. i As \\- was .subseaoeoHu discovered -beina j

•bSe coe Confiscated! by FSC - +be small telephone beek is not in

Condition ib'Was founds Ps^es have been rcmcveJ s?od

gncX tf-has been u>r\Hcn in btj 5cmecne.

"prieflu sValed/ +V>e MRSE bock con^j'ns lisHnas of: f

orod children in M^chia^o -cruciat +o esVs?blt5^

gndl (Sore needed "ta present "Vhe reverse 'Wiiliams rule evidence ;

Lee LoV)c toiVnessed alfer^aHcn behoeen Tioa CcraUs and yicWm

Obrciis' aile4-aht;ns • Brenda cr Lincis CO tohc observed

; Koo of ^V>e 3 cUenVs eF M^och. »aj9S^ esccfV - "

Jn

Page 20: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

p y

•fhos been eocpaecj. in fraud open +be Court; fc>^ sod

ih b h i fdih concealment-of

<rubvefsica

s scbrs ana aaenhs, in f

black eelskin address took tb "Vhe, 18.

cf His o+herui'ise. avaiUble- dies

si! "Hffies reUvanf, -since his fefiononcj in +he WSJ +n'al

+he Cocclis case 4^i3l sod ta +he. court- sp^oinh=d

dtocVors Go^e hss mstnfsincd he ^>^us^ have his

cUfcndl hinoselF. To the 1970 trial of ^oar

■{rial Counsel obfain bcfel records that would have led to

k>-accin<j 4hBi- he insisted ih>t trial btdeia^ed (fn

b i

18.

fimcs relevant; and ceohnuina, State, bss j?roduced the,

*t-ele?bcr>e. bock misrcpesenWna iV-+t> be the WR&E- bock

J from Gore, upon his acres V h>y FBE, Stofe. has

of

tcek

case &>re.

jSc

hfno "b obtain h«s UA6t ^d^ress bock- <?ryi c

both iniHsi frial InertO9?s)

of reHgi he has demanded ifcs ^roctocHon to r>c

gee1. Petitioners /^mended KeplM C^s 5"-7, ^>- 5. ) filed in. SClQ-(9il

in *bee.5.DiO • CSh-jteAs Response eonffnoes tV)e ruse and is. r>«p{-ed )

rway fee important to note- as testified to bu <Ti>/vilj {^onh trial ccon -

r .50OC evid. hescina, <Scrc «aS3S afraid ic

th<. Seorqi^ Florida border-;

Bel of ^oarfc case ah

anoithtn^)

{n

) J \ <-J

oF florida, 2/rtd"/£ discovcm ^recess \n tht. ?fayick

had been completed • He had already lost- Pit

The reason is .Simple, he knew pfesecutocs had ^swit-ched the books -

p-awnio<3 oft* *W Smail oscicsi' cne in Ccrciis case+rial

one ccnfiscahcd b^ FBE, 3S done in ^oar^< c^se

toed. He didn^- Knoto ^>i-osecoders had intended "b enUsi-

ped aHorrieus +0 ccnUno^ tV^e ruse. He igno^nH^ believed

book tocold be produced, in disroverM aVaje of Hcyfck case, IV tcasnh

Page 21: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

12s,A5,2000 ), if it had been discovered i>sas mere ihsn -SufFicienf evidence fa

enable. s?n effccttvelu assisting "trial czKomeu -h, succ&ssfiiiiu challeoge.

introduction e? all Wif/ieims rule evidence. Faiffnq -Hrjsf, eFFechvdu

caansel could have oKiised -*^e lab reperf- in Ih's currenf

o ccmpcii acafvjiH"^}/^^**0'7*^*-'"'^/^^ in "tnis Ci^cornshyniTfal

evidence case bu olemcnstraHcn of prcsecoVorisf bsrd PaiHa.

of £Ajh«ch sr<t ttlomio^tca more fu((u

b.) Suppression <^P Exeulp-iKve i-ab Analysis

Xn il-Vs current- incsrnstfon, ^ha &\\cacd lab feyort-surrcptih'custa

h> Hie record on aj>peal( on /MS- •Js^srdTs mohen C filed

f

Had Gore been efFecHve\a assisted or had +hecorrcnf'incc7rn3fi1cn of

report- teen prcdocecl W/Hiams rule evidence Prom loctlo "fhe.

3x~)d. Corclls cases uicuidi hsve been <suipprcsi-col s<s hoih

cases ^ce based open "H">e slleoafions of Corclis +V>3t- she Via<^

been aH-gckeJI bu Gore, Those gllcaaHons ^re false s?oc4 tocre.

frauciuienHu boUferecA by HsH/vnoou •Hrar' (5cre ui3S atrresh^l in

Kenfucku sind. upon bis arres> s p^ircf btccdeot ^nhs toere in. -

important ferccaff: AV ME 1>r, MtHieoisnis tesR<v\cnu in I99S «'nifi

■trial, trial counsel C'Geneva "y learned oF <s vacinal jspeci/ncn/^ crtawu

6ohih'sh Tiold, Per +V>e Fi'rs^ "time. Sfafe, sssccYcd i(r had-provided r«pcft"

SubstanViation /receipt-/^rcdoch'eo record has ever ioeen

repcrr"Crr. ) arjd handed

p

y ffencvi

never qc+ +!r>aV repcrr" Crr. ) grtd. handed Jwd«e T. Cafneu

report" similar "to -Hoe corrent- incaroahen sans vaojnal specimen ^n -

^iM^iS and noHntnq -furHner teas «3»d -tbe -the Joidfle di'd roll bis «Nes =?o<:

ke his he^d in e^asperahen. -l>urina &re%s icsh'rocntes C ^5 ^d 5^9 ^

ch-a-Kenaed Prosecctcrs 'to "produce'-Mne lab Cepcctjssserh'/ia be

oF one •+^hah showed 3 Coerces of vSemen ,xn spec^mea.

the 8tafe. did not" produce, repori- -H> i.mpeaeh G'crc ontil

13

Page 22: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

his .PosessCon held b|ooc( thai- bad slleaedlu been broken d

*- ' -' both <rore (t^pe Of pgm I plus, eap © ) «s>ncl Cere Its

p^m I mtnos/ <sap BA ) secordin^ to poltcc.

i)eFense sercloaist- in the. 1989 trial of Corcl\S's

had Conducted evcru test-of +be. dau upon the rcoogtncAer cF

"Hne blood a't-sins opon tbose p>anhs, znd his videoVspedi trial

f-eshmonu Cthe enhre trial wxas videotaped ) toas tVn^f- bfs

(no could Doi~ dchtrmfoe sou noore tWan to s^m the bicocii

TMpe O sod tupe. <A unci there, h^d tto be some reason

O H^er tViao i"estincj for Shihe, sercloaish Ovi&Pfc dl«fcctiv€_ -

K-aH~)l?en T\lelson } t"e claim sbe was able, ta break the specimens

dlcton For Hie

Tn 1990. borriicide defecHvt Mikt. ^bcCora deposed +o reveal-

Once eonvichons toere wronaFuUu secured in bei-b oiber cases —

blooded P3ob5 Wiere discovered In +V->e vehicle cf ?i(iss A&vick

"h^pe O sod -\xjv<z.A bloods ^ere soslM^ecA but", exactlu

Consishenh UQ\^n b^> KcbUnskMs analusis oP^ec^ens From the.

«3Vleatd +d have been in (Sbre'-s ^>os<zs$<cn upon ^ b

ens Ccutd noh be broken cloton furMoer -4V>ao b$ ssu

u3ere. "Hjfe- & -and fupe -A. (-Afp*., pgs. U ~13. infra")

report-The corrcnf incarnahoD cf i c

enzurne cisssi'Pfosfrans of "fhe

of beCora Is laoaoa^e 4"o move. Vine ^<jf£-A

prom "Hne osnfcs *h> "i^e exterior oF +V»t

.'beCv50CO cvid bepri.oa in %cark ease cT»*/v>^»m Hunt- also

be in ad Yiewect H->e Video+3pe cP Ccrctis case. W-ia\. i4is

<Dtb«r koou-n Copies have

Page 23: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

To liahhof HV)e Ststexs position \vktr\ ^Viroc^heot the'trial,

no blood W3S found. Cobsecved ioa court in sentencing Order),

the "beCora revelation tViat Miss /{cvick's blood "fype- Cssmt

Gores -Vd-Hoe Isst enzyme ^rocpfoa-aUe^ecl^f") coas Poanci

psnhs in her vehicle, -yet, -they were ncbutitized,

Were never made available to the. defense, srnd s?U

pacts of tVie Pcreaoinc), "HneM -6oiHn ^VVit ^. blood TMpes -

in fsctsto^ehed LOvHn -paobs confiscated open (Sores

3nd. toere a\-iii^ed Pa(selo 4o bolster Cofoliss

Onsobsfsntiatcd <3\UaaHar\s Sore had ^Hack-eoi her

opcapc

Yhos, hsd +bt corcenl- (ncsrnaffon oP lab reporh been ckts -

closed! 4o so efFecfivelu zssisfi'na fc(a( sHemcu >U

been oHlt'2cdl (to»th omer sfbresaic^ ev.d^ioce.) + ^

reiia^ili^ ^nd inhrodocficn of ytfftrams rule evidence„

+be Witnesses ?rorn "Hoe URGE address book 3S i/oel(/

■ft> explain -fVie glfcrc^Koo beiween CorciCs c?od ?f/iss?4ovrck.

OH Msrcch 1.2, (9S^ C fn. )6/sujp.~a>) to accoonh-for 4-beir blocd

(na on -V-he Panfs ?rcm Sere, brcakina if-op,£7od (Soreis

(b\ ^ h f hof Vhe ^ant-s <>aocid have been

proven and nc WifhaMs role evidence toccld hs»vt

Hoe l

On Hie other hsnek, ¥be presecoh'ens bad faith oaould

CorvAmancAed ^ccuiVtsl hscj "Hoe corrent f.ocarnaffoA cf report

been clisclcsed *fo *3f) efFechvelM assishna trial stferoeu.

The *De Cccg depo. proves "H^e report has been Falsified

ft Ctbu^rted bu JDeCcra!) tti present false d ffl

evidence..

on report- c/*' Niebons

op

i '

Page 24: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

AWhouah Gere, has reason ~ro believe +be current" incsrnahon op

lab fcporh" u>as ccoked snd seasoned -fo prejudice psrrieularlu

for +bis Courtis consompWcn., ^ it had been served +-o #n <?fFccfiv/e-

|o assisting -frfal aH-crncy or +o 6br« himsdP before +be defense

had restecl/ de-hective. bdCcr^ tAiculd have been Co»l(ecl ^

a defense wstVness- His testimony toculcl have i

if- was tlas inkearihj .Vi -Hoc WO depcsiHc^-Hist- tbtovctcd

from prcscnHna "Hoe False evidence open fbc

a as

*2.

Tt>os, -Hoe neeJl ^r> -present +he false >/7/t'ams fulc e\idaicc

'P^wn cPP (Sores vv small btlephone boohr" sts Vbe.

E- address book bej prcseccitonal sUij(V»t-oP hancl tocuicj

have been shewn *Hi estsbiish f^esscnaUe. doobf t>q

die pcs ifion fhcGurred! ^resecubosi intent-

of panHes ( rtetn*3$ &r *39 oo rcpcr-b) +o ci^im Gore

'Hot^/t HtV>en hid -Hr>ery> in +he Ccte home toV>ere

' " fieCorg

clcVhioGy

purports ^dcca 6Oere cotlect«ct ^

Vjt Pound no evidence there, sr>4 tef f

F/casc consider ihis : The ovcrfc>hdmi'o<5 defense- wcuid b^vt ■fhen.

+bioach"na required a ntw strsf-c^u. ^Ffer beCbca. buck

lie For prosecutor s?r>d his depo wjas filed, Shate f;U4

a noffce of infreni- "Vo c^c y//ltiam% rule evidence. rF oti^inatt

rcporr" to^ts cer^3ir>la u\ri\iz.cck to ^eccre indictmenih. The,

prosecution Kncto "H^«- exH^oeous cases couldi be dltspr<5ven jn

i~be charaes Inere .successrullu cAeFended .^qgtnst if 6^re ever

•received his LAfK&t. address. \dcoW. Were tbe 'btCcra nea^Kcn

6? -t-Vie lab repcrt- "Hie reason -H^e i7lf?St srctcAfcss tsoic bad fx>

sncA loVt^ "Hoc- l3^ report never d»scbseM Tf

Si

Page 25: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

-the current report been d\isclos<sc(, -Hie-jur^ Lo

"then been sskedl to cAecide i>oVi ether +he prosecutor h*d

acirosHa qene "to Kfrsstfevick's. hems. +o retrieve 3 psir cf

her ttfera 4p»n4*i€S +o e^pioiV- a p^ntu fcHsK s.o sjs h> -pre

feci", or -Vd create Ulo5or^ direct" evicAence s G

t- he did, not Find ncr +ake, s-n^t-VnrKj. (/lpy»xv j><p-8-9

infra. ) Unaware of fc«.Cera*s nejpflon, "Hifs Courftoas deceived .

(JnH( bc-Ccrg +Viwurteo| the prosecutors inhtnt fo present

(Ajorn p-gntfes , ^Hcy i^erc 44nc "Hne, prosecutions Cbrner-

sfene cf their entire, ease They toere- iF ~^«<} ha^

Coto home and been prsscnteci to Ub b^ SeCcr

os>co Vhe report- enou«Vi "to fru Gere- if

not been an honest cop.

Thouati it is uncidair what e*aetkj toss / is intended +c be

clone LG\ih "the bbo4ect paper ^nd bair C rf-cm^S oo repcrf

•fhe "Kiaht detecHve "DtCcra thunartecj prosecutors us<z cf

i at" evidence && ioeii b^ dientfto^ <t\s e^isherfce- C

p.. 13 -asicJlc Prom blcoded pants Vbcre ioas neoJ+ier bleed c

vicleoce „, cPee afso) p- <39 .single sVrar»cA in piltbo^.^ net" inX

Of ccorst^none cP H^e fcreacioc) di iscrepancies ocr

sii'CiCtAS t'nknh'ons toe re able'hs he. yrzsccireti to

Ol»ru 7 nor "to -fria\ jur^ bej ?7n cffccHvelcj sssishna

u Coor Crov-c^ beeacs^ current irtc^rnstfen was

ed )^ nor toece. +hct^ p^ese^>te4 b^ <s>n efPec+ivelcj

a ^pells'ht sHcrnc^fn ch3llc/>ae. -fo S

eccrc^ fa +h*s CcurK nor ever eteetoist

jba goa aVfofneq 5Jppo»nred to 6cr«t-

Page 26: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

C«) -Suppressten oP MDPD Jctoelru Trnpcandl Recg's

As revealed For Hie. ffrsV "time in Hoe 2>e0bfs cUpc.of

CsPfcr extrsneeus c<?ses hvd been iri eel ), t>avid Restrrepo had

informed him Gere hs.^ sv-sVc4 he \eFV hisjccoelfu in -Hit

ear gpfer -

genoe eP ^//ss yiov1ckxs jecoelra 'b^4 been recovered Pr-orv,

VeKicie, C

Tlrrs Corc'itS fiCK^ delechve Loais "p^ssare, etat., VesHFieoi

Sbouf jecoelroi sjite«ecJi.M .stolen From CbTc:lis en Ms?rch

i<38$ * Tri reievaof f'^rK +^>e*-) t-esiiPtcd as to CcreUs hay

inq rn-sde so tdenHFi'cah'cr? cF jjiweiru ctsiVvn'nQ »> hers

in cTMH bospvi-si fcom,OH Ct sboaf M^rch

500S -2006 <2cre obHu^eM public recces Fhsm

OoroUs csse, SpeciTicalla, he received +ine. 77cvcr

DPX dl 'F dd Qdisclosed MDPX> rm^ccndl 'Fecetp-V; dat^ed Jlily Q\t

C AffX, f,^£ ~3&, iflfra.^) Tine, receipt" sV7CxGS JecoeUu "

(mpoondedt ba defe

h tl H

in Cash

Cfis Cb j trial "

. Mot- in Mooch 1CO

The recerph 5?f issue t^as^ ftaus, in h'ohf" cP

a. ^ su^pressecl txs y>rcveoh i<

"-'us en tb« fc???sis t"^f Her Fs\scflci

ship cT lore's srn-4 ^fes ?ic*'/ckl£> Acu^\r*j \n Ivi^rcK

195^ „ C >/c6£ i f-be depo. of deK Ch?5mber3 prefn Cfcrc'lis

ease sbevos he coUecrecl 3 -signet- fina u*irV» je-ffer OT

*"K>iH"? cHo^r iFe^S "~ 33 in cJar^es Lee-iXcrd3n/,(Sar^-^ aiiss^

A £?fVer he "furntd thcver'io pfcs«r<:,jfcr tc

ear *iro be o T~-3S in Tins. Cere its )

Page 27: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

X. Trial Court1 Refused +o Conduct fleison

As a fMn^arnenhsl ri^hh Gore uoas enKHeci \rot +houoh dented the

protection o?. ihc efFechvc assistance cf ceunse.1 <5t both ^nc \99S

A 999 trials cF H-?e under<^nq cause. M«- ^as olenied such b^j

counsels unccrrecfcrd clcreticHcns in fhe ?V95 frrat and

retrial Hi ah fhe frial Ccurf C.Judae Leesfieid

Grore +o ^>u|-on record before H>c fn^l court- Cj"u

H~>e -ToUotolng Jsij^ buh tohich t-Ke isHrr refused ki alictAj. The

coorh's refusal prejudiced Geres direcf sppe-si bu denuina

f^ +b develop the record on /Per sz number op

issues, some of uihich sbcuU havt prevenl-edl a

reVT'ra\ from occurring af all.

d

?B\r

Id ffctson v. So.ja.256 (

court-

&cr<s\s moficn "H>

required!! fc concAucH sm ir^rviec\»3he ioa

l ccunsel,, tohcrvi Gore

•privaf-ciu c.1993 bot- i-obc toss cc

ru into

iinaftu

-trial

To 'h'mine, o? fcfvial ■prcceedinqs 6-ore mscie ore btnus motion

Pop disch-si^e <3n4 SubsHluHon of counsel.

(rcnova had rendered ineFFecHvc assfstvocc a

current- "pefPcrToance 3nd

^ees?icl4J« inil-isi i

b-ore iAilnerher he i^r^i ejeir;^ 'b s^t Geneva (whidn dot onW

h d ?lKA c^?994 be ecuM.ri*- afford -) 5?od when

a

irLj ccosisfed oP sski

did Och knetu 3^-inrH3i iri'aS Hnsh

also i-sken menctj from SVahL. He fnadwcrttnHu expcsec(

Geneva +o fi^ucl, aodl -i-3/< ev^sicn cbsr^es bo ftsfiTufna he psic

(3-cnova - Genovs toa-s ibus |»ut- under -■

Page 28: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

3.H.

replied ne^aHveiu +be imcficn was derntd«. 6rccc

e was able +o express his cencerns c# trcnova'-s refusals 4c 5

Seek dUsWsS<?( o? incUcfrrnenV- Por prejudicial prei/Kilicfrnent-dlelau;

^«it-e W;ffiam<» rule, .Suppress*cn moh'cn/ and; ar^e 3Vste'.s

Continued suppression o? (Sore's MK£t bteck eels kin address hook.

Upon <£ore%s pers;shsnf- -<+V)oa^h fan^enfi,?! - rei^Won of his

concerns of Geneva's dereiichoos, Juol^e /.ecsfielcl, obviocsiu

merit-/ ^Vsfed dhz would inform (JXiauaKctVienbera

3? 3ore\s nncrion sind sc^viseol Sore +& put^bis concerns en

reccrd

■Hie record c? YhaY Pclictoino d^M oppeacs, (Sore, u>as

io put" bte Concerns cf Geneva's derelictions on

eccrci . vJltdcje "KoH->enbcra Cwho, beina 3 prcsecubr dunoa

CcrdiS trial -involved in tHsh prcsecuHon -and sf 4i'/vic-

f 1996 ioiHai -hriai iohere Geneve? had called 6crt^ toifocss

t s^ sod Bddtess book 3 l Whos "Whc " - Looaldl have known eF

Vhe suppression of (Sere's iyHKfrE address bc-ok)^ Ve?m>

Sere fo smue his mot-ico f«r -subsbtfohen op

.Conversion of Goce\s a (-tempi-- ho diemfjostrife (Scncvs's

reUchoos in <sopporh oF noot<oo +o cStisch^rij* Geneva

3n aHempr- sf hybrid reprsseot-aHcn,fhe ceor(-3i/np/u

sirlu iancred sod Gilenccd &re.s ccnccms shi- -

den-b dc +Wi'> hsiP soc!

ia riohtLi Geneva a u si

C Flora Se*fT) fcr shsKb'ina cc counsel GuxVwiw'Terti^ in

previous Ccoru hianr?^ :?nJ ::cf posci^icn of Cocaine sfcisn ^^

y refused fc dcmoo.'ihr^hi -fbt disappear-,7n<-e c

kck^od ^Vafccd he avive ef to Core

35

Page 29: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

The trial Ccort~ ele/srlu abused discretion be* Failure to

30 sdejoste yi&tscn iOQuiru i^nen ccmipoancAed tt)73h

ba converting <3ore\s oooVion t*> dUscWarc^ coonscA

an gtttoapi- tr> en^^t in bubeid representation.

Kefotsina *to silota Gof-t -to

Cor Collusive. ) fVilore "to demonstrate -Mne SVatcs

©Oppression g1? Gore's MR&E address bcx>K s^nd \V"5 mabctiai-

6y ss a %2>raclu violation /IMD as the corrapV eirsbUnoi .

fschor -tingt- implicgt-evS onrelrabiliVM c? tV>e W//franis rule

re<^oir\nQ exclusion o? such evidence}

"the moHvahoft shr^sl-eQic indent-of prtincifohn^en V

olel"3M (b conctai DeCere's infermshon -and scoihJa cF the- -

books "hs enable wrcnoFui exfrsneous ccovtchoos oa -

oF othertoisc demonsfrsblcj false evidence 4q occur ),

Forced 6-ore to suffer s Vri^] -Hnejl- shoulcA never have been,

sllouied to -preceded 6Oit4n counsel usho ua^s ceFusi'ruj Jho

peform hfs duHj t"o iprovtde, efFective assislrsnce,.

/Althouah,/h^cA Gere, an effectivelu 3ss\shloa

counsel on cAtrech sjppes\; f\t^ FaiWft Vo condluct

gdeoo"3t-c rtefaon in^ufra CljF Mr. Korns V>3dnl- tzfuszd f

present' t^oe issue) uiouldl Vrave commanded 3 vetrial,

on Hoe record as it" appears - V>^d t^ne. //e-/.son inouf

been -performed ivOitVi adleqp^le cAevcCopo^ent-cf (Jorcls

Concerns, e\VV>er Hoeu i-V>emse)ves or aubshkife

e aucctcdfccl in havina iW »ndiicV/vient o

m, \F i^~ ^3^-s not-M»smcssc4 ^t- 4-rf<3l. ih

tooaldi have been dismissed on sppe-st - toould t

r<?cercA sUotoe^ "to be

Page 30: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

3> Fraudulent- Supplement?Hon oT Record

\>\j an eFfecHv/e\u sssisrina spp^llshi. counsel tt>

oppose i-he moHon bo supplement- record , ?\\td Auy.£5,3.006 .

h AAGc pnesenhed W>\$ Cfeurt- wiHS s fslse Ub report (<Sec;

., b.)/ suprci) rePemina "ba one of HW »reWoasla

porfions oF +he record -hi claim if hsdl been dh'sccv.

ered +0 deFense,. Cpreviouslu a^ in "prior k) inihal brief's filiAa

J J < I

Sinon of detective. OeCbrs \r\\o iW record C ifeven

Under +h% cojnfrontaiion -&m<:\ computsorij

rnt S^XtK /^TT>coarf7en(h +"r>e currtol*

'Hon. of "Hie l«.b report Should net" have been

Vb jc onchsiienqecl. TV has evaded scroHnu ai-everu

Ceov Graod Jury proceedco^s, frills , snei all appeals ^ onHl

The demons-hfNjHon of fne lub reports Pslsific-sh'cn s?s

a|- lenat^ ei^ewbece Vr> Vbe foreaotno Lci-B-j -public Ceceeels ,

Sble "hi be. -perbrmeci bu an effechveiu s?ssistroa

ounsel 3 mohco the.

SttcaUcus object-ions

C tV>sV- his

cVe/sr lack o?

on

•~»'

^.

For KihaVever reason,. "SfpeUaVe cconscl

Veru aVooa issues in h\s inihal brief

tree rtiA to enter 3 Falsified Ub report lo

ont gncl all „

c| AAS ^ RaLsiFi'cahon or Svi

qavc

| (ah

to e

ft5 the record or bu apftliafc. coco-ieIs ineffechve

e such, (S5ore^ appeal to-3-^ subverted

Page 31: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

;stance dr /4ppelUte Cbansei

e's appellate. coonseA, Mf.N^ochs, rendered ioeFFecHve

assistance^ in cnWjj 3 scegs s re aJb^ndlcoment- cF s

c\~ SVares suppression o1? l«t report" ; re Failure to

sin ass^omentor" error, tKe trial CcoHs-failure, to con-

h ^ yfctson \ncju\cij in liminc C^ec^ § A. 2. ,s^«OaP rt

l 7 o?nci; fe Failure Vo clrrsUenae /^/1G 5 rv^oHon to so^ple.

\~ +he record/ sutKenHciV-Q of current incarrrah'on of

report C ^ec. §/l3l/s^a); jn deprivation

Sixt'h and Fourteenth y4menclment'

a.) VMiHnin the initial bruef ISAr.Kcrris argued - fhoua'h cor-

jouslcji, did net dedUc-ste headiina For - -Hie, Stahts «5u?pressi'cr

the lab rcport-I~(5ee: §A. L, b.) sq^i-<x) Once ^G moved

Supplement" -Writ recordl, Nlr.NorrU t'Ot'frecHvcUj abandon

ll re\evsnt.

As related eiseu-bere in the vcreaoina

Dp record references Fcom truHsl tr\sl sod (n retrial tti

ea-^Ve the, States cinsubstsnHstecA assertions tVie Ub.

cporh had been cl'isclcsccA, Toe, Stated Fsilore to pref '

j-er ttie reporr-, H cootenaporsocousia rebuff 5?od i^

G-ore'S ■■tesHrvxn-U (in eifh&r -trisl ) ujiH-> Vfoe report-,-U (in eifh&r trisl ) ujiH-> Vfoe report-, bein-a

Y>rim<i£hci(t evidence of -the soppressien - stop <3enov«3 3.

assertion in \995> trisl he hsd never received. Such 3

4-Vv

lure "Vo -present tViost reccrd reFerencc:> -to s:

'^fpassion ix33s c\es«rl^ 'iOeffV-cti ve . rf nct bcr

P >e of 4W cUrect afpt--3.i <x>cut

as?

Page 32: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

b.) Mr. Morris rendered clear ineffective assistance, bu

failure "To sraoe *Hie 4rial ccortvs abuse of discretion in.

pail are. /tijusal to Conduct ^ Tietson iooui'fM snd H->e.

bti-rsru cess.shcn of (§orel3 repeated 3tempts -ho

om^nsrc^ Trial counsels derehch'ons 33 c^i,is<. for dis

arae and ^absti'hjtion cP Ccunse(c

As fclafed in in+h e Poreacio (Sore

TO 5'hous; Coonseis derettchons Conccrnsoa The.

Suppression of his t/lft&E sddfess book

clause +d sir^ue for suppression of

snd./or To ^eck dismissal of iodichmeoK

oF -such derelichon ^should have

rule

iionsa

expicrgbioo bu tVic Trial Court- but (Sore.

lu deprived & At (son inouvfM into his

- -'■ Trial coonsel'cs derelictions,J

t*F noV bof for Mr. Korris'-s inefTecfive Pgi(cre, fes fsise

fhe 'trtaf Ccorhs sbose of- cAucreHon (s^ \n re fas in

Conduct an ^cJeop'a-fc tielson in^o\ru ss s?n

oF error, open Vhe Pacts reUrec* \n The forcaoioa

00Home of "Vine ciisNecr- «ypp«.si tADould have been cTiTPerent

C* ) Upon i-he. pscrs of incfTcctive

y reference, in S/4.3. (n "^ne Fcreaoinc^Mft Morris

inerTecHve ^ssisNnce fc^ fsi 1 ore 4-o cbsiienae/l/IS

Tt> Suppleooenr- and /or TV-»e cocrenh incsrnahoa of ike. Ub

Ofon 4-he, arounds rclsVedl in Saici subsecTtcn,

TF Pot bat R>r Mr. Morris*s inelTective Ps

cf "Hnc direct" sppeai tocu\d h-^ve bee-a

The.

Page 33: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

Subversion of AU Collateral Remedies (

A\\ fsoKs, assertions, sod alieoaticn-s presented, in snd

the PoreQclncij parfkoiarlu iVjcocjh nct'exclo.sive.lu in o\se v+rsrop.Y

"FACTS sech'on^ arc repeated and incorporated berem.

As more fullu illuminated in the

riahhs \z> relief fro«~n pulltj

s hertcf, Acre's

oaFui ccnvic

as.

JX.

Pair access -H postconvich'en remcciies have been denied snnc^

remedies h-ave been obstTuchedl and oHnerwise untawFudu

the indiis/jcloal snd/or Cumulative efFechs cP :

cncoiVic Brttdu viclafi'cn ccocermnq (^crt^ MR6E address

c.1993-,2006 custodial extorHca scheme,C Pn. 10,

Postconvichi.cn Caurts Psilore h> c&ndoch Jidson. in^oi'ru I

onacina indi a

coercive miscenduct- ♦

no.-nbcr:s feferri.oc -h> ^^raqrcjphs cf Ohse Hrsre»?V TACTS

C ff )r hcrcin-aFt"cp.

The irnprcprieVy 6? Hne lotocr ooc.'i-& fepeshed Pail ores "b conduct-

inquiries, by difFereohju^es^evinces a sfanciina bias jo4 ho&tilttu in +ins{-

cnHre GtrcuihCcurb - j>rahchiy doc -ta vfch'oos ende, JsuNovick, fccinc j

Page 34: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

L -s Ongoing violations

As telafcd in BA,,'\., a.), Supra., ~Hne SV-ah; conHnues "hi fraudoUnHu

Conceal Scre*s AAR&E business related i?lack eeiskfn srddr-css hock, AW

fcs prescnVed in said. Pofeaot'na .subsectYcn art relied upon Were,

add\Hor\ +o +V>e M8eH address book, iiae Shahe. hs^ also sappr

feccrtAa oF alt iVivesrHaaHonal ccntschs noade i>u Isio

persons itsVcd

The materiality c? the LAR&t 3ddrcs$ book havf/7a been

in -Hie Foreocir>a (f»v \& lsujx\i')/ iV is clear if

onaclOQ Prauololent- conccslooenl' ^nci^opprcssicrv cf -H)e

book, Claim X c? \ht Peebia snoeoded poshronvichfen

could loave sod should h^vt been saved 3t- the. Sept. i'^

pps. 13 ~.2C, s-y>ra ) bu

YVierePooe, if Dot* bof For "Hot or\acin<* suppression c?

LARGE- address book artckaf Course, AA&^S Cb.3^ a

C benoho) iiAinq "br» +Wis Cccrh sh Orsl Acqumenfcs on

Support" clsi>isf +V>e oojhconoe. oP p&stcoAvich'on

* * *

.. CusVodt a\ Ex+orHon.

TF r>oY bet- for custedisi exhsrHcn scheme. C?n-l0,Si»;*;** ),

been sble bi sffcrc\ to <?eccpV- Jud^e Millers

be s^ppiemeohs^ "p/^ se Cpp^59 ^i^^p.ns.) srnd

of 4+ie. prcceedto^s uiculd b-^ve d»fFcrec{ -as

31

oFfcr

cufco

depc

Page 35: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

3. Judge MtUefS Failure to Conduct /letecn Togiriru

V'tet-oed \n -proper -perspective., +he C4S& HrsroKY facts,

Sequence of events , clearlu oleoicns+raf-es Mic failope,

"ft* conduct" so immdciiafeL ylctsog inooiru info +be

+f»e "prc &c rrjcfi'on fi\edl//

olicial to Gere. The fsitore enabled Ch.57" sqeote "h> fr^udu ■

enHu claim

q

didnt" feceWe -trial c?od Sfpel Is he. Counsels rec

o^cM^S/ as a p{c+"iHoas defense h* (Soreis

in iurn, enable-ci -f-hc J>erpeh^h'on ef

"Hien uHlizedi +djusHP« t-hei'r re?iAS9\(s) to prcseof eiH^er the,

fi i( p l nod/er 3 moti'cn +

J'udj't

jmpuhe tl^me vfo Gore For his refusal +0

have or use -privileqed and conPidenfial records.

4x) AA&'S erroneous -posiHcn Mnar Gert hoA

no riahi" +0 oamplain o? ecori- s-ppoinhcoi Clry.a^^enb dUtrcitc

4s C 5ee: OcK 37, AO<D^ +rsns. f - 32 ), &lf

os Inss no riqnf4o 3 Hefscn inquiru, 6©re lo^sJ ki j'

Xf.

of +V»ere beina no need Por sddiHcnal pubWc records Id

-prescnV- the -Se?*/fe>erf and T/4C claims C^p - 23--??, ^-^/vt )

mease. rtoLe. 1 The PicHfious defense is oohoolu moot in It

Gore Ira4 rewiriV^eo,. uoi^h Sufficienf pg

ici k* y i-he defense is a rtcn Se%uitcr *ir>ck t

^anu cf 4V>e e>cco\p^Voru crossover cUCrvis (Sere f

be presented doe, "Vd +he simple pact- iVieu set alt proven by

SVati.9Me. fUbli'cRecords Ccb.37aoenb^ciu^cdfB obhaj'n in ■Hiose.-

previous 3 ij&ars ■$£&:. Qtir/£7,2o£i\ Vr^os^p'^l ) Gere had no control

over 3od were opoo paefcal Gccil cjearlu

Page 36: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

Tf is fcoeil established +he state has an affirmative

conferred by the Fourteenth Amendment +© ensort it's

sdec^traH: of>pork>ni>u +0 Pair I a success tbe courts* tt>os,

Florida has opt^ed to provide court- spj>c inttd Cb.a1^

1-D Fulfill thghoblfa^ffcn, respechve f& cspifd deFeri-

anfs, +o •prohecf -H^pf indli'vroloais inhereshs,/tetson r

O PespeciiYe +^ coorf appcinf-ed represen-f^hon

lAlhaf has not- been esfsbiished - buh tohrch nonetheless

does exis-h irrespechvc op ^ctmbrix - is the scarce, and

f bU 3ocl ePfecHve. sssisj-aoce af coonsei

Ch. ^7 sjenhs , Ts \\- a Sixth Atnend. viybt bu resscn of

postconvfeffon mohon bein^ -Hot first place ccrtefn cl-afms can

be raised , ocf is il- 3 FourVcenth /Imcnd, rljht, bu reason cF

+fe sfafe's opting +0 ^ppciof coonirel "fe FulFjil -Hie

h oblfjaHon ? TcHHoner telfcvts i> is

have b'^bU^i"

Hven if there \s no such n'^hh Acre's jrcozdurai riohh

3 ^/e/sc/? ioopiru U incitepot^bte in h'aht of 4he

h h

/? ioopiru U incitepot^bte in haht of

e dohj T& vvionifor "the performance oF

coenset srnd +o receive, ^nd cvgloatt sdeaakons i>73cle,

the -performsoce op Ch.57c7aenf3

Herey <TiAdyz Miller eoss noh foo\ecH (yp. \5-20,

knew Cb.A7 s»c)€ots were -perpeff^HnA a fraud.

fold hfM onder JZaonhrix. the Ch.5^ c?aenis

back enck do nothing CF shc/tincu cinose.

sfHr cTad^e Milltc uoxHiessed the O^,57

i^ponlhj sgsinsf Goreis direction and iofercsks

received Gere'3 ccmpiainV^ buh never evsloafed

. Ke

Hie AKS-

Page 37: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

The rcsuih oF sJudoe Millers fsilore to-js 5>n onpair snci lop

5idec} proceeding vfolatice of &crels s

k "fbe tcjuatprotection c/aust s>ncf fo an

u +o preseoi" Hi's ^rfevsnees under +V>e clue process

fc pefiffca.

aFFcrd a

ccmnvand ( JL37. 771 O2.)), nor did tint courf

in<joir<j Gpr«s was

oivc efFecf ha his "prccedor^l otat -process

enKfled +o sc as

Gore toss never o'llowec( hs demonsfrafe. +hsh +he

had. or ^e^ascnablu should have ho^+he Public Records

Gores exculpsfow Crossover c Isiwi; -Hied ujereteVusii

Hi properly plead kaifh

oV "Hie Sl-sbe's Oustedtdl exhcrHcn scheme

^e unre^scn^bie. sdlvers-jri^l mfscooeioct'of Ch.27aQtnis:/

he was nevee able Hho j>ceseof his claims i^r relief doe fe his

T^ftv^rfxA gndl

ThercPore/ if nch bwh for +he paiiurc fo condocf- a Aejson

or Jljdae Millers failure to oWierwist core +^c CW.a^a

3neeG) of (Sore.s direchons suasponke., FaSUna

Sabsfrrote 4V)t AA&S 0i.37«?aei^Ks UiiVVi res5orj3i>lc- coonse-i,

outcome o? "Vhe jpostconvichon proceedinas toeuU hav«.

lsHu bee/> dUffefeot' in tiqht' or r"intefa'ti&'~'*ktt,%itzfuk~

itu of +he evidence of +he rSfahrs ongefnq 'ferad-u vioia -

§ ConcernfA a (Sere '3 ^RSE address, book, Ctfee:

Oners/\noeoded "Re^lu Piled bee,2010 in SCIQ-r9ji )

Course / -fhe. mvi'hrdl rr»o+ion +d S

Miller atregt^ Kr)ei~i tVjis

3H

t*s never Filed be cause

OcV.27, ^60^ hesrrina .

Page 38: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

H. AAG*Ch.a7AQen\-\s Perfidious Performance.

From +he onset- op poshcGnvtcKcr^fhs oase has been plauu

bij +he AA&S Ob. 27 ajenhs koccjin^iu acecpfiYiQ improper

otherwise, ^sih^hn^ themselves""^ Ufan +loc

e exishV^ conflicts e? foferesh2*e^cta cf +be Ch.57 syenhs u»cr^tcl pricrlu in offices

naU

in

ir IS Hncuin he w>js iawschcci V "

eeo an on -

of

Rcsficns of material evidence, sod +b< ioeFPecHve

30.

Malissa bonoho si^ua-hrd herself as lead counsel on SCOS-lSHS

(5bre obVsincd photc^rt7phs o? Steven Hsiwitr frcm +he v

memorial y^e. shou>(r>^ he had been involved <n fntfrtafe.

reigffonship Lc'ifh. her. Tf is beh'cvcei Jonoho was sckch-^l tu M/'.

i+ -for her work chains4- 6brc (n +he "Rivera cast Cj>p.H-<«, -

bUonj',^ Gere ?or Kivcrais crimes -in rebUafico O) Per

(3-cre\s civil suihs qcj^i'nsi- CCR ^fbrne^r c7od/or Per <sxpo^iV>« fhdr

friend - tt>t vicfi'm - as hsvina been ^n esccrH. rnhrreshn<jia, the.

r used in *H-empt- -hs seduce <Scre to fivu ctazu Cc?h> -

coUect- eviacnct ? ), Vgiertc Rivera, is nooe ctber tU^n the f?m-

F bcr>chc.S eticnK Cs^x Briefs iSiJ«£«LV^2^f«C60,9576&> )

T^cthenber^ .selected l-Unn/wcr. rh is nc ccincidence - buf~ui

ise, ont^pcrtanh - -Hnal- Hsjvjai^ scc^bh Vo h^ve (Jew.

l>Medi'3ht?t) after 6crc presented

Pcr Paitore io Seek her dts^tralifreshen fir

35

pr^-ecctec<

Page 39: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

of counsel (+rial BOd appellee.- ) \n "Hneir regards, discussed

more putlu elsewhere and ^->reuaWcer H-)t pcreayna, in+-he,

n9Ci'°f deliberate Circumvention and deprivation cF Sort'sfundamental riyhbs -hi pefiHon Por redress Cmst-shePederal Cocrts )/ and *fo obta,n ui^rranhed reliefs o'

i^Tiose "p^rHculsr excoipaH>rM cla<oos,~'

gcnVs

hsvc

32.

p to

bribe; to coerce, snei to force- Gore inbo scccpHr»a

Hcipahnc) in 3n Kd Ui itt ^ ^g

perpefrahL s fr^ud upen -fKe. eo^r\r. +0 foreoo hfs ex-

bf/v> deduced menhsiij incompe|-cne

oF fslse loihnesses - in ^ 3|

erryenV- +0 recommend 3 h'fc senfence. be crdered tu

loused coorh The(r unreasonable, aclx ^>a

be-ccirvaFVer,. unzrc +hei> means of

+0 ?iircP/easa y?ofce; Tn bee. 206 5 (or)ir

sr series cF 9JH0 cl^inos "te

j ke presented in 3 habeas Peh'hon +o

el^i.nos discaised in J A.H.t suprat

cluiMS. CK.a*? g^ente refused "to

tack eF records ."rViea cle^rlu aod

b^ve h^c( t&s "H^e rcccrtis needed

6crc

hsd or

Publfc "Records Gcrti cculd neh and did nor

eVr refusal 053$ cgccjlousiy onfsr

i (Sere has

?rc.x

cisi/ws

f- Can be easily prcven. He h^ rejected alt cVhej

Hn-ah enable -\byt AA& h onct ag-zin prcdoce false evidence.t&4.3.,suj>ra.) Ch.A^ scents are. ensbtfna such fraud

Page 40: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

Frono -Hoe cnseh oP -Untie *ffoinhv>enV-<s) Hsmmer,

d n*Ui Scher Ctoho refuses +o respond to bi'tcceklu letters

Gore ), hsve. refused +d obev^ £cre\s direc+icns in

all rcltv^nh retards, Such \s "befoj ferPcr^ed under

syente Penned <sr>a Praodulcne ssserHens cFin 60revs OoenNl incompetence, -asserted sclelu ?or

of dcFendiog +Vie,r wfs«ndod- bet**+Ke p

"3insi~ (Sore,

?

bis inhsreshs.

all tfrvtcs retevaor; Ck 27 sjeohs

j goilKpkiase cl«frvis

notice, plt^dfna teas

+0

noooh posfKon

rclevanh C^.^^enhs refused 4t>

iPablic Kecords Search/tnvesfraatrons to S

f/i

Ar all Tfmcs Pclev^nh, CV>» 9^7- <3aenfts refused

fachs or excui^pabrw crossover c\3f^s

i^hour i-he ?occ.Qo\na . Off record/+V

notscGnstrachton, or chV>erwise cite st-shpbr^ consrrstnts

++>e\T jprosecokon

railed

ino, pronlbih'vc of

crossover issues. On vccorJl,

deny if. Cej,/luc^osr, £oo.s

o? -Vhe Suppression of evidence,

, and E/IC clainas in 4^e ^#

\O gad. H-hroQ^'hoci- *Hie Poreacfna «7rt, prayen ku -ff^

Public "Records +Ke O-». 5^ ^geohs refused io

obtain or foh(ch +Vvea

Page 41: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

AY 3(1 times relevant, tint CkW agents lied abc.rU

ntent- of records in conce-atmeot- cF the. proof of

Factual predicafes of exculpatory crossover dafMs.feTassone*s |ics gbootthe beCbc* deposition not rcvcalfoa

H> discovery of blooded pnhs jo HfissticYtcAs. vebfeii. -noh revegdnj e^isfence s?od S+afe-s fo.sess.fco of -i LAKG£ scWrws hock- - ss exposed in SCI0-J9 j| b" -

, toere rcit-e^afioos oP hencho^ lies prevfeuslu «t©l4 )

Donoho repeahed fhe lies +o this Cccrhoo ^bb«{by her de,f\^\n^ "Ho-ah -fherc to as3 remaod nr'Purthtr

o

3ll ifnnes rcitvarvh, Ck X7 a^eote, ^"le^dca ^od p

menNi (ncornpefeocc^ s?^ 4Seot"encina pWa^e (Vsues

expressicj denaanded noh i>«. ^resenfc^ /»r ALL.

he in-ad cteli'beTTBhtl^ ^o( skafeaic-atlu mooted ^-(n'a/ro as+0 *3Vot:d g rcpUtj of -H^e events in Ccbmbu Co. case. HeAd CU. 37 sjenhs, ^ore Waci, thai- he

Second chair cccmsdl ^k> speciTicallu

his Innocence, eooid fc»^ ^roveA fn

all relevant-, 3s gore\s objech'ens aq

prodochfon cF inveo^rcj -fo H^m^er. efaf., relgfe CFiled

Tassone^s fnohon Bsr 'rehegrfoA c. Sec. iocs >, (Sore, was under-

Hhre*!- b^ Gh.a^ ^enhs H Cecpen3nd fo Force thefr Corrupt ^Uejea deal w>ih V

footnotes 4-7,

Ch,

have corropHtj aod

tn5S ^3*^si~<3cr<L "h> pro feet

O

saenhs t^

Page 42: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

(Acre's yrz <se complaint and fa Pccecicse bis exposure o

e szfhsroey miSCOoduch (merfifrfeious srnd o+Wer«o£se>.

-Wrvtes relevant; OcoHnuino to federa (o

p

Ch.27 cTqents have unh^Fuftu

F fom

/ -hi ,

p OF PraudoUnf evi

dence Cas -Hne false |-3k fcpcrh had i>ecn ) 5c srs k> ccrropf-4 "Hoe in(-c^MK^'cf icrcn^?w( ecnvicHons, </.«., -

fhetj h^ve been subverfio^ (Seres -•speciFi'csiijj selected excutp^ 'pDtij clsions^ <3oc( sroppbot-ed +ir)(r^ uiiH-i ^rhjae cisi^s in4-encAeci io enable AA& fo ipresenf never beFcrc seen oeco

i Fa b.rt egVed / falsified evidence -35 she bsd done on

Ccnfrci C Qra\ Arq's Ve\>. OH, 20C9 SCQ5 -18-^8: )

7^vc iy»Bliciousiu contrived "hs fr^ucHoicnHij ^ubYert-

pcshccnvich'on remedies in aid h> +V.e Fu rHoeranee ©F

>^}/^(S>s Prsudotenh concealment oF the eaceaious

or prc s ecuborr^I mis-cor>duct'^7r>d i/ieFFccti've ^ssiaYsnccc?

OoonselCs) gf- irral s^nd en direct- «rppeal -seVouh elseU)V>ere in tV>t Porc^Di.oc

V- t&sae Were sod in botln of (3brc\s extraneous esses,

^ onresscn?b\c condocirTF OoV ioof For iW CV>.

houf in Vhe fbre^cin^, H-hsV was UFh uncurcd andfo Gonh'noe.; Vine outcome of poshronWcWon

tAcoid have differed particularly, ^ogjk not exclusively

in lujbt- cp fbe evidence. cF Hne -prcsecut-on^t miscendoch,Usue |>resenbed tu Sere, in Sc io 1911,

3?

Page 43: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

COHCLOSrON

Upon lh<z foregoing, if \s rcspectRtllu ^ubmiHc-d the results/

ie proceedings un<Jec\yinj "Hnis c*use,,arevei^ Shjje, have been o

obtained b^ ffaudoieoh prosecorori^i Tv»isco«aoct, unreasonable

. op Ceor^. a^pOinVcc^ counsels, and,Judicial eirsr/impropri

Wherejn postceovicHon, Ch.^7^cnhs 5-re shown to hwt

■to prosecute, relieF tovrrsnh'na, <^oicklu proven aodnrsraji

expensive pros . miscenduch <?nd TAC claims related thereto

■t pursued o

of

cc

p ^^ exorbibntta costia |

Hon Strafgits «o»Hoout- u»3rraohed c^use Ce^,, cempeeeocu i

l-*Cfws travel Per prcs-FIere 8eFF «nd Dcnchc to retorn 4^ -fhelr

^ed^-to unnecessarily depose IV.M

corruption oF 4it proceedin3s is deFmih'vcia i

WHERETORE, feHHonef hombi^ jraijs +hvs Cocrh enter n

\(*>rr)cdi3)rc cease and desist-order+o Ch.a7 sjsnf- Todd .Sc^r

e^-^/., fo grsnV- this f efihon, and fo Pashicn wu reliefs

necessaru as Uu> sod .justice

Under pnd^ cf fcrjorij, r# Msrs.L. fibre, a

Correctness cF sll f^chs present in ihc Fcr

j This achon U takco in 9cod faith, open

Ti'Hcrr>cr»r- to reliefs , Si^Crr> -h> pod .s^coi

the

bchcP in en

IMlAf -228 SK F

Page 44: Ccmrof Tiomm - Florida Supreme Court

Office of th fork

<OC S

COOKT

PeKHon &

6^. i-r. Ho, ?O -

ix, enclosed

irfcvick cssc )

Cferk %*esdc.j

OoPcHuo^elu -Hbc jupisclicHcn cf -Bits Goc»+ and +be/

under sH-gck C ^

ccf c(.

u uziii see, oearlu ;7i{ r b<?Se tbts «»ch'cn uocn is jU-cjcAa

jprcveo in SCiOf9U . However, i+j»no.5 jike +bt /4/i6*'^ fainTicsh'cn er l7

!Ub repcrt-/ihs Palstn'ca-Wcn, sard Ht&tcn'ctit* \ssois an mot-e. \Homir\a+M

here ,3s sucln sp^U'cs io 4V>e cotieHcotieHu.'nd e^t h^

H'

SASt irQ

/ '(Vv

a ecu?, ti.'«

Hid ^12S SK g-(3

A»c

or

cause,