粲偶素态的实验研究indico.ihep.ac.cn/event/263/contribution/8/material/... · 2015. 3....
Transcript of 粲偶素态的实验研究indico.ihep.ac.cn/event/263/contribution/8/material/... · 2015. 3....
OutlineIntroductionCharm mesons1−− charmonium (above threshold) ISR(Initial State Radiation) correctionCharm production cross section measurement
Below D*D thresholdAbove D*D threshold
Energy dependent charm cross sectionExotic charmonium statesSummary
2
What’s charmoniumPotential model
Charmonium spectrumOpen charm threshold
Introduction
3
What is charmoniumBound state of a charm quark and its anti-quark
Quantum number: n, L, S, JParity and charge conjugate: P=(-1)L+1,C=(-1)L+S
Not all JPC are allowed (e.g. 0+-,0--,1-+,2+- forbidden)
rc c
4
Potential modelc-quarks are heavy, mc~1.5GeV, velocities small: v/c~1/4, non-relativistic QM can be applied
Ψ=Ψ+Ψ∇− ErVmr
)(2
22
s4V(r) ~ br3 r
α− +
Colombic short distance component
large distance component
5
Charmonium spectrum
DDb threshold
Most of them areNot observed
Observed byexperiment
6
Decay propertyBelow open charm threshold
Only electromagnetic or αs suppressed decay are allowed mostly narrow states Good place to study the light hadron spectrum
Above open charm thresholdDDb decays are allowed mostly board states Ideal charm factory
7
Non-DDbar decay
8transition
Measure the quantum numbersProduction
Same JPC (1−−)as photon in e+e− collision
C=+ in two photon (γγ) production
DecayAngular distribution of decay products JP
Prefer to 2-body decays (e.g., γ+X)
Selection rulesConservation of J
Conservation of P and C in strong and EM decays, Isospin in strong decay
9
Charmonium spectrum --below DDb threshold
DDb threshold
ψ, ηc, χc, hc10
Open charm thresholds
11
D0, D+, Ds mesons
D* mesons
Reconstruction of charm mesons
Charm mesons
12
D0 mesonc,u-bar quark
M~(1864.5±0.4)MeV, τ~(410.1±1.5)×10-15 sec
Decay modes
mode fractions
K−π+ 3.80%
K−π+π0 14.1%
Ksπ+π− 2.9%
K−π+π+π− 7.72%
Κ−e+ν 3.51%
13
D+ mesonc, d-bar quark
M~(1869.3±0.4)MeV, τ~(1040±7)×10-15 sec
Decay modesmode fractions
Ksπ+ 1.47%
K−π+π+ 9.51%
Ksπ+π0 7.0%
K−π+π+π0 5.5%
Ksπ+π+π− 3.11%
K0e+ν 8.6%
14
Ds mesonc, s-bar quark
M~(1968.2±0.5)MeV, τ~(500±7)×10-15 sec
Decay modes mode fractions
K+K0b 4.4%
K+K−π+ 5.2%
φπ+π0 11%
ηπ+ 2.11%
ηρ+ 13.1%
φl+ν 2.4%
μ+νμ 0.6%
15
D* mesonD*+ D*0 Ds*
Mass ~2010 MeV ~2007 MeV ~2112 MeV
mode fractions
D*0
D0π0 61.9%
D0γ 38.1%
D*+
D0π+ 67.7%
D+π0 30.7%
D+γ 1.6%
Ds*
Ds+γ 94.2%
Ds+π0 5.8%
16
The Q values for D* D transitions
17
Q: D momentum in D* rest frame
Reconstruction of charm mesonsReconstruction of D mesons
Lots of decay channels branching ratios smallerHigher multiplicities , low momentum tracks reconstruction efficiencies lower
Reconstruction of D* mesonsHard to reconstruct the soft pions
Reconstruction of charmonium from DDb productionIdentify production procedure by momentum distribution of reconstructed D mesonsExtremely difficult for transition procedure like ψ γχc, χc DDb
18
Resonant parameters
ψ(3770)
ψ(4040)
ψ(4160)
ψ(4415)
1−− charmonnium
19
1−− charmonium states
ψe+
e-
Important BES contribution to R
( hadrons)( )e eRe e
σσ μ μ
+ −
+ − + −
→=
→
DDb thresholdCharmonium spectrum from potential model20
σ(e+e− hadrons)Non-resonance contribution
e+e− γ* hadrons (u, d, s quark anti-quark pairs)
Resonance contributione+e− γ* Res hadrons
N L σ ε= ⋅ ⋅Monte Carlo
Luminosity
Cross section21
Resonant parametersBorn order σ(e+e− Res hadrons) is described by a Breit-Wigner formula
ee2 2 2
12πΓ( )( - M )+M Γ
ss
σ Γ=
M: central mass of resonanceΓ: total decay width of resonanceΓee: partial width of resonance decay to e+e− pair√s: energy of center-of-mass system
eepeak 2
12πM
σ Γ= ×
Γ
22
Resonant parameters of 1−− charmoniumstate M Γ Γee
J/ψ 1S ~3096.9 MeV ~93.4 keV ~5.55 keV
ψ(2S) 2S ~3686 MeV ~337 keV ~2.48 keV
ψ(3770) 1D ~3771 MeV ~23.0 MeV ~0.242 keV
ψ(4040) 3S ~4039 MeV ~80 MeV ~0.86 keV
ψ(4160) 2D ~4153 MeV ~103 MeV ~0.83 keV
ψ(4415) 4S ~4421 MeV ~62 MeV ~0.58 keV
23
The decay width of 1-- charmonium
24
Theory model can not predict decay width to D*D,D*D* very well The experiment results need improvingGood opportunity at BESIII
Charm cross section predicted bycoupled-channel model
25
ψ(3770): a 13D1--23S1 mixing state
26
Generally, ψ(3370) is assumed to be the 13D1 state, perhaps with a significant 23S1 component
3 31 1(3770) cos 1 D sin 2 Sψ = θ + θ
Γexp~23 MeV θ~−17º
ee
ee
0.10 0.03(thy)( (3770))0.12 0.02(exp)( (3686))
±⎧Γ ψ= ⎨ ±Γ ψ ⎩
ψ(3770): decay and production X- sec
27
Almost 100% decay to DDb, small fractions (<5%) to non-DDb (e. g. π+π− J/ψ)
Isospin conservation and P-wave phase space
0
30 0
D
D
p( (3770) D D ) 1.45( (3770) D D ) p +
+ −
⎛ ⎞σ ψ →= =⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟σ ψ → ⎝ ⎠
~1.3—1.4
Suppressed by a 3D1 form factor
ψ(3770): decay angle
28
(3770) DDψ →
JPC
ψ(3770) 1−−
D 0−+
2P(cos ) sinθ = θ
a vector resonance decay to a pair of pseudoscalars, they should be produced with the angular distribution P(cosθ)=sin2θ, θ is the polarangle
ψ(4040) and ψ(4160)
29
DDb production is much smaller
D*D dominate at ψ(4040), D*D* dominate at ψ(4160)
σ(Ds*Ds) at ψ(4160) ~ 3 σ(DsDs) at ψ(4040)
ψ(4040): a D*D* molecule?
30
*0 *0 *0 0 0 0B(D D : D D : D D ) ~ 1:1.2 : 0.09
*0 *0 *0 0 03
0B (D D : D D : D D ) ~ 128p
: 5 : 0.15
*0 *0 *0 0 0 0D D D D D D>> >>ψ(4040) might be a D*D* molecule
ψ(4040)
31
ISR (Initial State Radiation)
32
Radiation correction
ISR and FSRInterference between ISR and FSRRadiation correction in Particle decays ( DR)
Important to electron-contained final state PHOTOS
CEEX(Coherent Exclusive Exponentiation)
32
Observed cross section
33
In e+e− collision, the observed cross section for a certain physics procedure is the contribution of
Born order cross sectionFor resonance, a Breit-Wigner
Radiation effectsBeam energy spread
Gaussian appoximateImportant for narrow resonance
Effective CMS energy
34
Only ψ
(3770)D
Db
is considered
CMS energy shift
ISR effects to physics analysis
35
reso
lutio
nsef
ficie
ncie
s
ISR tails
Special function needed when Fitting the mass plot
The feature of ISR photons
36
Distributed around beam direction
might be more than one ISR photons, most of them are not detectable (low energies)
Small probability for large ISR photons
Special trigger and large coverage solid angle detector provide a opportunity to study 1– charmonium states at high energy region, e.g. B-factories
Charm production cross section from Belle (ISR measurements)
37
Resonance Generation at BESIII
1. ρ, ω, φ2. ρ', ω', ρ", φ' (Γee is not well measured)3. J/ψ, ψ(2S), ψ(3770), ψ(4030), ψ(4160), ψ(4415)
1. Beam energy spread2. ISR and FSR return3. Generate μ-pair, τ-
pair and hadron events according to their cross section
4. For hadron events:• Quark and anti-
quark pairs• Resonances
5. Generated particles are send to programs to handle particle decays or to simulation programs
38
Below D*D threshold
Above D*D threshold
39
Measurements of charm production cross section
Event display for charmonium to DDb
40
0 0(3770) D Dψ → *s s(4160) D D+ −ψ →
Charm tag
41
Single tag: charm mesons are pair produced, fully reconstructing a D decay from a subset of tracks in an event therefore guarantees that the remaining tracks originated from the recoiling Dbar.
The reconstructed D is referred to as the tagged D or simply the tagEverything not associated with the tag is referred to as recoil.Once a tag has been obtained, the recoil track can be analyzed for the decay modes of interest
Double tag: both D and Dbar are fully reconstructedFlavor tag, CP tag, semi-leptonic tag, etc.
Charm tag below D*D threshold
42
( ) ( )2 2
2 2
E
= −
= −Δ = −
∑ ∑inv i i
bc b
D
D
b
M E p
EM E
Ep
Since the D's are pair produced and the Laboratory frame is also the rest frame of the DD system, each D is produced with an energy equal to that of the beamin the laboratory frame.
Cross section measurement
43
i i iDDS 2 N B= × × ×ε
i j ijDDij 2
i iiDD
2 N B B i jD
N B i j× × × × ≠⎧
= ⎨ × × =⎩
εε
2i j i j i jDDS S 4 N B B× = × × × × ×ε ε
i j ij
ij i jDD 2
i ii2
ii i
S S1 i j2 D
NS1 i j
4 D
×⎧× × ≠⎪ ×⎪= ⎨
⎪ × × =⎪⎩
εε ε
εε
~1
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
D K , K , K
D K , K ,K
D K , K
− + − + − + + −
+ − + + + + + −
+ + − + +
→ π π π π π π
→ π π π π π π
→ π π π π π
Cabibbo favored hadronicdecay modes, with large branching ratios, are selected to be as tags.
Lots of systematic cancelledWhen applying double tagtechnique
BESII measurement: σψ(3770)
44
0 0D D
D D
DD
(3.44 0.24 0.16)nb
(2.37 0.29 0.14)nb
(5.81 0.38 0.22)nb+ −
σ = ± ±
σ = ± ±
σ = ± ±Single tags
Double tags
CLEOc measurement: σψ(3770)
45
0 0
0.070.05D D0.100.04D D
0.170.08DD
(3.60 0.07 )nb
(2.79 0.07 )nb
(6.39 0.10 )nb
+ −
+−
+−
+−
σ = ±
σ = ±
σ = ±
Charm tag above D*D threshold
46
The low Q value of the hadronic decay modes of the D* provides a clean method to identify charm.
To determine charmed meson cross sections above the D* production threshold, requires the D* branching ratios.
D mesons can be produced either directly or as decay products of D*‘s through DD, D*D, D*D*
The recoil mass squared spectrum will provide clean information to identify the production procedure
2 2D Du ( s E ) p= − −
D tagging above D*D threshold
47
D meson from D*D*,D*D and DD can be Clean identified by Momentum CUT
BES I√s=4.03 data
D0 KπD
*D*
DD
D*D
Monte Carlo simulation at BESIII
48
*(4040) D Dψ →
production Original D
D*0D0 direct D
D*0D0 D*0 π0D0
D*0D0 D*0 γD0
D*+D− D*+ π+D0
D*+D− direct D
D*+D− D*+ π0D+
D*+D− D*+ γD+
D momentum distributions are obtained byMC simulation, ISR, ψ(4040) lineshape, beamEnergy spread are taken into account
Sim
ulta
neou
sly fi
t
Tag reconstruction(√s=4.14GeV)
49
Recoil mass fitting(√s=4.14GeV)
50
Xsec measurement with double tag method above D*D threshold
51
Single tag reconstruction
52
D0 Kπ
D0 Kπππ
D+ Kππ
D*D D*D*
Double tag reconstruction(D*D)
53
Double tag reconstruction (D*D*)
54
Results
55
measure measure
2 2measure predict measure predict2
2 2
( ) ( )
i ij
i i ij ij
i ijS D
S S D Dχ
σ σ− −
= +∑ ∑
0
0
* 0
Br( ) (3.95 0.58 0.26)%Br( ) (8.24 1.12 0.57)%Br( ) (9.6 2.9 1.4)%Br( ) (51 11 5)%
D KD KD KD D
ππ π π
π ππ
− +
− + + −
+ − + +
+ +
→ = ± ±→ = ± ±
→ = ± ±→ = ± ±
Replace by a likelihoodfor low statistics double tagχ2=−2logL
0 *0
*
*0 *0
* *
( ) (2.46 0.51)nb( ) (2.31 0.65)nb
( ) (2.07 0.37)nb( ) (0.87 0.22)nb
D DD D
D DD D
σ
σ
σ
σ
±
±
= ±
= ±
= ±
= ±
∓
∓
Lower than world average value(~68%), it hints there might be a DDπ(γ) moleculeat ψ(4040), but not confirmed by experiment
Around ψ(3770) (BESII)
3.97--4.26GeV (CLEO-c)
cross section using initial-state radiation (BELLE)
56
Energy dependedcharm cross section
Energy dependent production cross section
57
The observed cross section is the total contribution of born order cross section, the ISR kernel function and beam energy spread
A correction factor is needed for a certain energy point. The typical values of ISR correction factors are between 0.7—0.8 for ψ(3770), ψ(4030), ψ(4160), etc
How to get energy dependent cross sectionEnergy scan experimentISR in high energy region
58
D0 K−π+
D+ K−π+ π+
Energy dependent cross section around ψ(3770) from BESII
59
Get # of events in each energy point
Calculate luminosity in each energy point
σ(E)’s are normalized by the σpeak
ISR effects to D tag reconstruction efficiencies are taken into account
σ(ψ
D0 D
0 bar
)σ(
ψD
+D
− )
Open Charm Production in e+e-Annihilations ECM = 3970-4260 GeV
60
Primary CLEO-c motivations:Determine optimal energy for Ds studiesAssess capabilities for D physics above y(3770)
Additional Objectives: Detailed study of “intricate behavior” of hadronic cross section in the region above open-charm threshold. Y(4260): confirmation
Scan Data Sample:12 energies, 60 pb-1
20pb-1 around 4.17 GeV
Tag reconstruction
61
DD
DD*
D*D*
DsDs
DsDs*
MC Ds φπ Ecm = 4160 MeV
Cut on ΔE, use Mbc toextract yields
Cut on Mbc, use invariantmass to extract yields
σ(D*D*, D*D, DD)
62
Plateau in D*D*
Very little DD
D*D Enhancement at D*D* threshold
σ(DsDs, Ds*Ds, Ds*Ds*)
63
Location that maximizes the Ds
+ yield.
Peak structure in DsDs
Charm cross section using initial-stateradiation (e+e− γ + D(*)+D*−)
64
ISR photon is required
D0 candidates are reconstructed using five decay modes
D+ candidates are reconstructed using the decay modes
D*+ candidates are selected via D*+ π+D0
Recoiling mass of
will appear in a peak around D*+ mass
0SK ,KK,K ,K ,Kπ πππ ππ ππ
SK ,K ,KKπ ππ π
(*) (*)ISR ISR
(*) 2 2rec ISR CMS D D
M (D ) (E E ) p+ ++
γ γγ = − −
Belle measurements
65
* *(e e D D )+ − + −σ →
*(e e D D )+ − ±σ → ∓
Similar technique can be use to obtain σ(DD) and maybe the σ(D*0D0) , butdifficult to σ(D*0D*0)directly.
66
Measurementof resonanceparameters of highercharmoniumstates
Interference effects must be taken intoaccount carefully
In addition, the non-resonance DDbar production should be included
X(3872)The 1– family, Y(4260) etc
The 3940 familyCharged states
67
Exotic charmonium states
X(3872) ππ J/ψ
68
The X(3872) puzzle
69
Not matching any predicted state?
Above DD threshold (allowed):should have large width but it is narrow
Charmonium is suppressed due todecay into J/ψ ρ (isospin violation)
Open options•DD* molecule
•Right at the threshold•favours DD* decay over J/ψππ over J/ψγ(as observed)
•Tetraquark•Explains small width•Predicts a set of 4 states (2 charged and2 neutral).
•Finding the charged states is critical•Charmonium
•Not ruled out, but which state is it?
X(3872) D0D*0
70
Belle [PRL 97, 162002 (2006)] observed X(3872) D0D0π0
Confirmation and integration from BaBar in B DD*K
The 1– family: Several bumps observed in e+e- Y γISR
71
A new state: Y(4260)PRL 95, 142001 (2005)
Yet another state Y(4350)PRL 98, 212001 (2007)
The youngest of the 1-- family
72
The 3940 family
73
Y J/ψωX D*D
The first charged state: Z(4430)
74
summary
75
Charmonium below DDb threshold completed
Above open charm threshold, lots of blanks need to be filled
Exotic charmonium states discovered recently need understanding
BESIII will have great opportunities to make contribtions to charmonium physics
祝同学们学习愉快!谢谢!!