CC no. 117/S/15 Present: None. (Ashish Aggarwal) Chief...
Transcript of CC no. 117/S/15 Present: None. (Ashish Aggarwal) Chief...
CC no. 117/S/15
15.12.2015Present: None.
Nobody has appeared on behalf of the applicant. Arguments are to
be addressed on the maintainability of caveat. Last opportunity is granted to the
applicant and his counsel to appear.
List on 22.02.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
CC no. 473/1
15.12.2015Present: Counsel for complainant.
Counsel for complainant prays for adjournment for recording of
evidence. He submits that the complainant is not available today. In the interest
of justice, last and final opportunity is granted to the complainant.
Renotify on 19.01.2016. The said date is fixed at the specific
request of counsel for complainant.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
CC no. 650/1
15.12.2015Present: Counsel for complainant with complainant.
Heard arguments. Previous status report is perused. As per previous
status report, submitted by SI Ravinder PS Alipur FIR no.1102/14 has been
registered at PS Alipur. Investigation was reported to be pending. Let a fresh
status report be called for. Notice be issued to the IO for this purpose returnable
on the next date of hearing.
SI Dinesh from PS Swaroop Nagar is present. He submits that there
is no investigation pending at PS Swaroop Nagar. He is discharged.
List on 16.02.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 204/08PS S. P. Badli
15.12.2015Present: None for State.
Accused Joginder Singh and Dalbir Singh are absent.
Accused Charanjeet Singh has already been convicted and
sentenced.
Accused Joginder Singh and Dalbir Singh have not appeared
despite repeated calls. In the interest of justice, they are granted one more
opportunity to put in appearance.
List for further proceedings on 16.03.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 346/09PS S. P. Badli
15.12.2015Present: None for State.
Accused Dheeraj @ Pankaj with counsel.
Accused submits that on reconsidering his plea, he has decided not
to plead guilty. He submits that the matter may be proceeded with for trial. At
request, the case is adjourned to 12.02.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 91/13PS Alipur
15.12.2015Present: None.
Neither APP nor accused have appeared. The surety of the accused
has also not appeared. Keeping in view the previous record of absence, it is
directed that nonbailable warrants be issued against the accused.
List on 03.03.2016. (Ashish Aggarwal)
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North) Delhi
15.12.2015
FIR no. 445/13PS Alipur
15.12.2015Present: None.
Accused has not appeared despite repeated calls. In the interest of
justice, he is granted one more opportunity to put in appearance.
List for appearance of accused and for further proceedings on
21.03.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 252/13PS Alipur
15.12.2015Present: None.
There is no report regarding status of further investigation. Let
notice be issued to the IO to file report on the next date of hearing.
List on 16.03.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 334/13PS Alipur
15.12.2015Present: None for State.
Accused persons are absent.Counsel for accused persons.
Counsel for accused persons verbally prays for exemption from
personal appearance on behalf of accused Brijesh Sharma and Sanjay Shekhari.
Heard arguments. The request is allowed. The said accused persons are exempted
from their personal appearance for today only.
Put up for appearance of accused persons and for further
proceedings on 11.02.2016.
Let notice be also issued to the IO for his appearance before this
court on the next date of hearing for clarifications. IO shall explain as to why all
directors of the company which is registered owner of the vehicle, have not been
arrayed as accused persons for offence under Section 180 of Motor Vehicles Act,
in terms of Section 199 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 420/15PS Alipur
15.12.2015Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.
Accused persons Sukhdev and Binder with counsel.Accused Baldev Singh is absent.
Counsel for accused persons verbally prays for exemption from
personal appearance on behalf of accused Baldev Singh. Arguments are heard.
The request is allowed. The said accused is exempted from his personal
appearance for today only.
List for appearance of accused Baldev Singh and for further
proceedings on 16.03.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 110/13PS Alipur
15.12.2015Present: None for State.
None for accused persons.
Accused persons have not appeared despite repeated calls.
Considering that they have appeared on the last date of hearing, they are granted
one more opportunity to put in appearance.
List on 25.02.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 300/05PS Alipur
15.12.2015Present: None for State.
Accused Shakil in person.
The matter is listed for PE. No PW is present today.
Put up for PE on 21.01.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 64/07PS Alipur
15.12.2015Present: None for State.
Accused in person.
The matter is listed for PE. No PW is present today.
Put up for PE on 13.01.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 87/11PS Alipur
15.12.2015Present: None for State.
Both accused in person with counsel.
The matter is listed for PE. No PW is present today.
Put up for PE on 03.02.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 252/13PS Alipur
15.12.2015Present: None for State.
Accused in person.
Let copy of police report and accompanying documents be supplied
to the accused.
Put up for scrutiny of documents and for further proceedings on
28.01.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 385/02PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.Accused Bijender Singh in person.
Report in terms of previous order has not been received. Let fresh
court notice be issued in terms of previous order returnable on 12.01.2016.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 191/05PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State with HC Sridhar.Ms. Suman and Mr. Naveen wife and son of complainant are present.
Ms. Suman and Mr. Naveen wife and son of complainant submit
that they are competent to make statement on behalf of the complainant. Ms.
Suman and Mr. Naveen wife and son of complainant submit that they have no
objection if the untraced report is accepted. Joint statement of Ms. Suman and
Mr. Naveen wife and son of complainant is recorded separately in this regard.
Elaborate investigation has been carried out by the police. Despite
efforts of the police, stolen car has not been recovered and offender could not be
traced. Untraced report is accepted in view of the joint statement of Ms. Suman
and Mr. Naveen wife and son of complainant recorded today. File be sent back
to concerned police station with copy of this order and be preserved to be re
opened as and when any clue is found. Copy thereof shall be retained in the
Court with the original ordersheet and shall be consigned to record room after
due compliance.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 560/13PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.Accused Amit and Gaurav in person.
Accused persons submit that they intend to plead guilty for the
offence under Section 33 of Delhi Excise Act. Meaning and consequences of
plead guilty have been explained to the accused persons. They are given some
more time to think over the same. The case shall be taken up again at 12:00 noon.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
File taken up again at 12:00 noon.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.Accused Amit and Gaurav in person.
Accused persons have pleaded guilty to the offence punishable
under Section 33 of Delhi Excise Act. Accused persons are informed about the
consequences of pleading guilty. They however reiterate their plea of guilt. Their
joint statement is recorded separately. In view of the voluntary plea of guilt by
accused persons, they are convicted for offence punishable under Section 33 of
Delhi Excise Act.
Arguments on the point of sentence are heard. Having regard to the
fact that accused persons have voluntarily admitted their mistake and have not
tried to put up a false defence, a lenient view is warranted. For offence under
Section 33 of Delhi Excise Act, convicts are sentenced to imprisonment till rising
of the court (in the custody of naib court Ct. Ravi Kant and be produced before
the Ld. CMM at 04:00 pm) and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/ each. In default of
payment of fine, the convicts shall undergo simple imprisonment for ten days.
Fine is paid. Bail bonds of convicts are cancelled. Their sureties are discharged.
Original documents, if any, be returned to the rightful claimant against
acknowledgment. Endorsement, if any, be also cancelled. The case is disposed
off. File be consigned to record room.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 962/14PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.
IO is not present. Complainant is also not present despite service.
Let fresh court notice be issued to the IO and complainant for their appearance
before this court on the next date of hearing. Last opportunity is granted to the
complainant to put in appearance.
List on 23.02.2016.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 305/14PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.
IO is not present. Complainant is also not present despite service.
Let fresh court notice be issued to the IO and complainant for their appearance
before this court on the next date of hearing. Last opportunity is granted to the
complainant to put in appearance.
List on 23.02.2016.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 974/14PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.
IO is not present despite service. Complainant is also not present
despite service. Let fresh court notice be issued to the IO and complainant for
their appearance before this court on the next date of hearing. Last opportunity is
granted to the complainant to put in appearance.
List on 23.02.2016.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 556/14PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.
IO is present. IO submits that he communicated with the
complainant over the phone and that the complainant shall appear before the
court on the next date of hearing. Upon submissions of the IO one more
opportunity is granted to the complainant to put in appearance. Let fresh court
notice be issued to the complainant to be served through IO HC Subhash Chand.
List on 23.02.2016.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 429/11PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.
IO ASI Kulbir is not present. Let fresh court notice be issued to the
IO for his appearance before this court on the next date of hearing.
List on 08.02.2016.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 703/14PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.
IO ASI Pradeep Kumar is not present despite service. He is granted
one more opportunity to put in appearance. Oral intimation in this regard is also
given to naib court Ct. Ravi Kant.
List on 08.02.2016.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
CC no. 476/1
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.Complainant Ms. Geeta with counsel Mr. Ram Kumar.
Counsel for complainant submits that he shall file his vakalatnama
during the course of the day. Counsel for complainant submits that the
complainant is not satisfied with the untraced report.
Counsel for complainant submits that he needs some time to file the
protest petition. At request, time is allowed.
Put up for further proceedings on 01.02.2016.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 520/15PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.
IO is not present despite service. Complainant is also not present
despite service. Let fresh court notice be issued to the IO and complainant for
their appearance before this court on the next date of hearing. Last opportunity is
granted to the complainant to put in appearance.
List on 23.02.2016.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 1040/14PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.Complainant in person.
A report has been received under the signatures of HC Devender.
The said report is duly forwarded by SHO PS Alipur. Let notice be issued to the
IO for his appearance before this court on the next date of hearing.
List on 08.01.2015.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 1473/14PS S. P. Badli
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under Section
138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.IO HC Jagat from PS S. P. Badli.
The IO concerned submits that he has not placed on record the
photographs of the alleged defacement as he took the photographs from his cell phone
and the said cell phone has got misplaced and is since untraceable. The IO further
submits that the defacement in the present case was in form of a hoarding which was
tied up/suspended between two poles. Submissions of IO are heard. Record is perused.
Perusal of the chargesheet also reveals that defacement was in the form of a hoarding.
The IO and the police report allege commission of offence under Section 3 of Delhi
Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 2007. As per allegations, the accused had
affixed a board in between two electricity poles.
Section 3 of the said Act punishes defacement of property by “writing or
marking”. The placing of a board between two electricity poles does not amount to
defacement by writing or marking as held by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of
T. S. Marwah Vs. State 2008 (4) JCC 2561. Although the said decision was rendered in
the context of Section 3 of the West Bengal Prevention of Defacement of Property Act,
1976, the decision equally applies to the present case since the provisions of Section 3
of the West Bengal Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 1976 are analogous to
that of Section 3 of Delhi Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 2007. Hence,
Section 3 of Delhi Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 2007 is not attracted to
the facts of the present case. Cognizance is declined. Proceedings are dropped. The
police report is rejected. Bail bonds of the accused are cancelled. His surety is
discharged. File be consigned to record room.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 418/15PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.Complainant Mr.Bhavesh Chaudhary in person.
Complainant submits that he has no objection if the untraced report
is accepted. Statement of complainant is recorded separately in this regard.
Elaborate investigation has been carried out by the police. Despite
efforts of the police, stolen 64 sacks of supari not been recovered and offender
could not be traced. Untraced report is accepted in view of the statement of
complainant recorded today. File be sent back to concerned police station with
copy of this order and be preserved to be reopened as and when any clue is
found. Copy thereof shall be retained in the Court with the original ordersheet
and shall be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 799/14PS Mahendra Park
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.Accused Shri Niwas with counsel.
Accused has voluntarily pleaded guilty to the offence punishable
under Section 3 of Delhi Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 2007.
Accused is informed about the consequences of pleading guilty. He reiterates his
plea of guilt. His statement is recorded separately. In view of the voluntary plea
of guilt by accused, he is convicted of offence punishable under Section 3 of
Delhi Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 2007.
Arguments on the point of sentence are heard. Having regard to the
fact that accused has voluntarily admitted his mistake and has not tried to put up
a false defence, a lenient view is warranted. Regard is also had to the antecedents,
age and character of the offender, which preeminently show that there is a high
possibility of reformation. For offence under Section 3 of Delhi Prevention of
Defacement of Property Act, 2007, convict is sentenced to imprisonment till
rising of the court and to pay fine of Rs.500/. In default of payment of fine, the
convict shall undergo simple imprisonment for five days. Fine is paid. Bail bonds
of convict are cancelled. His surety is discharged. Original documents, if any, be
returned to the rightful claimant against acknowledgment. Endorsement, if any,
be also cancelled. The case is disposed off. File be consigned to record room.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi/15.12.2015
FIR no. 223/12PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
File taken up today on an application for cancellation of bailable
warrants on behalf of accused Neeraj @ Monu.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.Accused in person with counsel.
Arguments on the application are heard. For the reasons stated in
the application, the same is allowed. Bailable warrants directed to be issued
against accused Neeraj @ Monu are hereby cancelled subject to payment of costs
of Rs.700/. Costs paid. Accused is warned to be careful in attending the court
proceedings in future.
Put up on date fixed i.e. 19.01.2016.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 297/08PS Alipur
15.12.2015Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.
Accused in person with counsel Mr. Sumit Gupta.
The matter is listed for PE. PW2 Shyam Lal is present. His
testimony is recorded. He is discharged.
Put up for remaining PE on 18.03.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 25/11PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.Accused Jai Praksh in person.
PW/superdar Prahlad Singh is present. The matter is listed for PE.
Superdar submits that he has not brought the vehicle and he shall bring the
offending vehicle on the next date of hearing. Keeping in mind the vehicle is not
produced, the case is adjourned for PE to 12.05.2016. Superdar is directed to
produce the vehicle on the next date of hearing.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR No. 227/12PS Alipur (DIU)
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
File taken up today pursuant to the directions/conditions imposed in
order dated 27.07.2015.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.Accused Shiksha Sharma and Ramesh Sharma with legal aid counsel Mr. Suresh Bhardwaj.
As directed by the order dated 27.07.2015, the aforementioned
accused persons are present before the court. Their presence is recorded. They
are discharged for today only.
Put up on date fixed i.e. 15.01.2016.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 107/07PS Alipur
15.12.2015Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.
Accused in person.
The matter is listed for PE. PW4 HC Rajesh Kumar is present. His
testimony is recorded. He is discharged.
Put up for remaining PE on 17.03.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
CC no.595/1
15.12.2015Present: Authorized representative of complainant.
Accused in person.
The offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act is
compoundable. Parties submit that they wish to explore the possibility of
settlement before the Lok Adalat.
As per directions of DLSA, North, Delhi, there shall be a
continuous Lok Adalat held on each day and cases may be referred for the said
daily Lok Adalat. This is a fit case to refer to the daily continuous Lok Adalat.
The procedure devised by DLSA for referring the matter to Lok
Adalat is that file has to be sent to the Ld. Secretary, District Legal Services
Authority for further directions who may assign it to the Daily Continuous Lok
Adalat. In view thereof, it is directed that file be placed before Mr. Naveen
Kumar Kashyap, Ld. Secretary, North District Legal Services Authority
immediately for referring the same to Daily Continuous Lok Adalat scheduled for
today. Ahlmad shall send the file immediately. Referral order is prepared
separately as per format prescribed by DLSA.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
CC no. 595/1
15.12.2015The case is taken up in Daily Continuous Lok Adalat.
Present: Authorized representative of complainant.Accused in person.
A settlement is arrived at between the complainant and the accused.
Authorized representative of complainant submits that he wishes to compound
the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. His statement is
recorded separately. In view of his statement, the said offence is compounded.
The case is disposed off as settled. Let file be consigned to record room.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Associate Member Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)/ DCLA Presiding Officer DCLA 15.12.2015 Delhi
15.12.2015
FIR no. 420/12PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.Accused Shiv Shankar is absent.
The matter is listed for PE. PW Mr. Ashok Kumar is present.
Accused has not appeared despite repeated calls. Issue bailable
warrants in the sum of Rs.5,000/ against him.
List on 08.02.2016.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 221/11PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
File taken up today on an application for cancellation of superdari
and permission to sell the vehicle bearing registration no.HR51AE0198 filed on
behalf of applicant/superdar Rajesh Kumar.
Present: Ld. APP for State.Applicant in person with counsel.
Heard arguments in respect of the application. It is stated in the
application that the aforesaid vehicle was released on superdari to the applicant.
It is further stated in the application that the applicant has already been examined
and discharged and the vehicle has already been exhibited. Besides, the
photographs of the vehicle already on record, the aforementioned applicant has
tendered fresh photographs. In these circumstances, the application is allowed.
Superdari of the vehicle bearing no. HR51AE0198 is cancelled. Superdar is
permitted to sell the said vehicle.
Put up on date fixed i.e. 20.01.2016.
Copy of this order be given dasti, as prayed for.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 301/14PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
File taken up today on an application for cancellation of superdari
and permission to sell the vehicle bearing registration no.HR38M4055 filed on
behalf of applicant/superdar Arun Kumar Bansal.
Present: Ld. APP for State.Applicant in person with counsel.
Heard arguments in respect of the application. It is stated in the
application that the aforesaid vehicle was released on superdari to the applicant.
It is further stated in the application that the applicant has already been examined
and discharged and the vehicle has already been exhibited. Besides, the
photographs of the vehicle already on record, the aforementioned applicant has
tendered fresh photographs. In these circumstances, the application is allowed.
Superdari of the vehicle bearing no. HR38M4055 is cancelled. Superdar is
permitted to sell the said vehicle.
Put up on date fixed i.e. 19.01.2016.
Copy of this order be given dasti, as prayed for.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 752/14PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Fresh police report is received from filing section. It be checked
and registered.
Present: Ld. APP for State.
The police report and accompanying documents are perused. From
the material available on record cognizance of offences under Sections 279 and
304A of IPC is taken. There is sufficient ground for proceeding against the
accused.
Issue summons to the accused mentioned under column no.11 of
the chargesheet to be served through IO returnable on 19.01.2016.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 96/14PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Fresh police report is received from filing section. It be checked
and registered.
Present: Ld. APP for State.
The police report and accompanying documents are perused. From
the material available on record cognizance of offences under Sections 279, 337,
338 and 304A of IPC is taken. There is sufficient ground for proceeding against
the accused.
Issue summons to the accused mentioned under column no.11 of
the chargesheet to be served through IO returnable on 29.02.2016.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 1228/14PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Fresh police report is received from filing section. It be checked
and registered.
Present: Ld. APP for State.
The police report and accompanying documents are perused. From
the material available on record cognizance of offence under Section 3 of Delhi
Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 2007 is taken. There is sufficient
ground for proceeding against the accused.
Issue summons to the accused mentioned under column no.11 of
the chargesheet to be served through IO returnable on 05.05.2016.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 180/11PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.Accused Ramesh Chand is absent.
On the last date of hearing, production warrants were directed to be
issued against accused Ramesh Chand. The said warrants received back with the
report that the accused is not present in Tihar Jail. Issue nonbailable warrants
against the accused to be executed through IO concerned.
List on 11.03.2016.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 892/15PS Alipur
15.12.2015This is an application for remand of accused Hemant and Baldev in
judicial custody for a period of fourteen days.
Present: Ld. APP for the State. Accused Hemant and Baldev produced from judicial custody. IO SI Dhirendra Singh.
An application has been moved for extension of judicial custody for
fourteen days of the aforementioned accused persons. It is stated therein that
investigation is still pending, the continued custody is submitted to be imperative
for the investigation and for securing the presence of the accused persons before
the court.
Arguments are heard. Record is perused. Sufficiency of ground for
continued detention is examined.
Submissions made by the IO are found to be meritorious, in view
thereof, the judicial custody of the aforementioned accused persons is extended
by fourteen days. They be produced before the court of Ld. Duty MM on
29.12.2015.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 82/14PS Crime Branch
15.12.2015Present: Ld. APP for the State. SI Raghu Kumar from PS S. P. Badli IO in case FIR no.793/14 PS
S. P. Badli.
In the last order this court directed the IO of FIR no.82/14 PS
Crime Branch to appear before the court. The said IO is not present. It appears
that even the process has not been issued in terms of previous order. Ahlmad is
reprimanded and is directed to be careful in future. Let fresh process be issued in
terms of previous order returnable on 06.01.2016. Oral intimation in this regard
is also given to naib court concerned Ct. Mahavir.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 128/15PS Alipur
15.12.2015This is an application for permission to interrogate and arrest
accused Lokesh S/o Satish in judicial custody.
Present: Ld. APP for State with IO HC Naresh Kumar alongwith SI Dhirendra Singh.
Heard arguments in respect of the said application. Applicant HC
Naresh Kumar submits that interrogation shall be carried out by SI Dhirendra
Singh and that he may be permitted to do so.
The accused person is stated to be in judicial custody in separate
case. The application is allowed. As per Rule 20 (4) and Rule 21 of Delhi Prisons
(Visitors of Prisons) Rules, 1988, SI Dhirendra Singh is permitted to interrogate
the above named accused in Tihar Jail. The Superintendent, Tihar Jail is directed
to allow the said interrogation. Let copy of this order be given dasti to the
applicant, as prayed. SI Dhirendra Singh or HC Naresh Kumar shall
communicate the order to the Superintendent for compliance. For this purpose,
the order shall be treated as a direction addressed to the Superintendent.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 130/11PS EOW
15.12.2015Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.
As per report of Ahlmad, the Parcha Yadasht is not traceable. Some
more time is sought to trace the said Parcha Yadasht. At request of Ahlmad, time
is given.
List on 15.01.2016.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
DD no. 25A dated 26.11.2015PS Alipur
15.12.2015Fresh application is received from Institute of Human Behaviour &
Allied Sciences (IHBAS) under the signatures of Dr. Vishal Dhiman counter
signed by Dr. Deepak Kumar.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.Dr. Rahul Kumar, Junior Resident Doctor.
It is stated by aforementioned doctor that husband of the patient Dr.
V. P. Singh has not contacted the hospital as yet. As per the said letter, the patient
requires further hospitalization for her management and treatment. Submissions
are heard. The record is perused. It is directed that aforementioned patient Mamta
be kept in Institute of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences (IHBAS) for the
period of hospitalization and treatment, as per rules and medical opinion or until
the further orders of the court, if passed sooner. Furthermore, IO HC Pawan
Kumar is directed to contact Dr. V. P. Singh R/o 25D, B. D. Estate, First Floor,
Timar Pur, Delhi and to ensure the due service of the court notice for his
appearance before this court on the next date of hearing. Copy of this order be
given dasti to Dr. Rahul Kumar, as prayed.
List on 04.01.2016.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR no. 460/15 PS Alipur
15.12.2015File taken up today on an application for bail under Section 437 of
Criminal Procedure Code filed on behalf of applicant/accused Rohtash.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for the State.Mr. Suresh Bhardwaj, legal aid counsel for accused/applicant.
Arguments are heard on the said bail application. It is argued by ld.
counsel for accused that the accused is languishing in judicial custody for
approximately five months. As per counsel for accused, the chargesheet has
already been filed and the charge has already been framed. Counsel for accused
submits that the trial shall take its own course and the accused cannot be held
behind the bars for the entire continuity of the trial.
Ld. APP has opposed the present bail application on the ground that
despite the charge has been framed not only single prosecution witness has been
examined as yet. Ld. APP submits that if the accused is allowed to be at large
accused shall temper with evidence and shall influence the witnesses.
I have heard arguments and perused the record carefully.
I find merits in the submissions of Ld. APP that despite framing of
charge, examination of prosecution witness is not begin as yet. The record
reveals that the next date fixed for examination of witness is 07.01.2016. Keeping
in mind the submissions of Ld. APP and the apprehension expressed thereon and
upon finding merits therein I deem it appropriate to disallow the present
application as of now. Considering that the prosecution witnesses specially the
complainant has not been examined as yet, I am not inclined to grant the benefit
of bail to the accused at this stage. Consequently, the bail application is hereby
dismissed. Further, in the interest of justice, counsel for accused is granted
opportunity to file a fresh application as and when the prosecution
witness/complaint Sandeep is examined. Copy of this order be given dasti, as
prayed.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR No. 512/14PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
This is an application for remand of accused in judicial custody for
fourteen days.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State with IO SI Ravinder.Accused Ravi Bhardwaj @ Bunty produced from judicial custody.Counsel for accused.
It is stated by the IO that the investigation is still pending and he
shall file the chargesheet shortly. It is further submitted by the IO that the
accused is a parole jumper and is involved in a murder case. Further, there is
possibility of accused to flee from justice and influencing the witnesses and
tamper with evidence. It is also stated by the IO that the accused is a habitual
offender and is languishing in JC in a murder case. The IO has expresses his
strong apprehension that the accused may prejudice the safety of the
complainant.
Submissions of IO are heard and are taken on record. Sufficiency
of ground of detention and continued custody are examined. Same are found to
be satisfactory.
I find merits in the submissions of the IO. In these circumstances, I
deem it appropriate to extend the judicial custody of accused by fourteen days.
Accused is remanded to judicial custody to be produced before the court of Ld.
Duty MM on 29.12.2015.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Metropolitan Magistrate (Reliever)
Delhi 15.12.2015
CC no. 722/1
15.12.2015Present: Authorized representative of complainant.
Accused in person.
Accused has made part payment of Rs.2300/ to authorized
representative of the complainant, which is accepted by him on behalf of the
complainant.
Put up for remaining payment on 05.01.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
CC no. 619/1
15.12.2015Present: Authorized representative of complainant.
Accused in person.
Accused has made part payment of Rs.2300/ to authorized
representative of the complainant, which is accepted by him on behalf of the
complainant.
Put up for remaining payment on 12.01.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
CC No. 596/1, 598/1, 599/1, 602/1, 608/1 and 621/1
15.12.2015Present: Authorized representative of complainant.
Accused is absent.
Nonbailable warrants issued against the accused received back
unexecuted. Issue fresh nonbailable warrants against the accused.
List on 14.01.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal)Chief Metropolitan Magistrate(North)
Delhi. 15.12.2015
CC no. 622/1
15.12.2015Present: Authorized representative of complainant.
Report on the process is perused. Complainant is directed to furnish
the latest address of the accused by the next date of hearing.
Renotify on 14.01.2016. (Ashish Aggarwal)
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North) Delhi
15.12.2015
CC no. 617/1
15.12.2015Present: Authorized representative of complainant.
Accused is absent.
Process issued in terms of last order not received back. Fresh
process be issued in terms of last order returnable on 14.01.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
CC no. 618/1
15.12.2015Present: Authorized representative of the complainant.
Authorized representative of complainant has furnished the address
of the guarantor. Authorized representative of complainant submits that the
guarantor must be aware of the present address of the accused. He submits that
the guarantor may be called to the court to disclose the address of the accused. In
view of his submissions, it is directed that the guarantor whose name and address
are disclosed by the authorized representative of the complainant shall be called
through notice with directions to disclose the address of the accused.
List on 14.01.2016. (Ashish Aggarwal)
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North) Delhi
15.12.2015
CC no. 217/1 and 592/1
15.12.2015Present: Authorized representative of complainant with counsel for
complainant.Accused and his guarantor are absent.
Notice issued to the guarantor of accused received back served.
Guarantor of accused has not appeared despite service of notice. He has not
disclosed the address of the accused. It appears that he is deliberately withholding
information of whereabouts of the accused so as to shield him from prosecution.
Issue bailable warrants in the sum of Rs.5,000/ against the guarantor of accused
at his office address.
List on 14.01.2016. (Ashish Aggarwal)
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North) Delhi
15.12.2015
CC no. 999/1 and 1410/1
15.12.2015Present: Authorized representative of complainant.
Accused is absent.
Nonbailable warrants issued against the accused received back
unexecuted. Issue fresh nonbailable warrants against the accused to be executed
through the SHO.
List on 14.01.2016. (Ashish Aggarwal)
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North) Delhi
15.12.2015
CC no. 1380/1
15.12.2015Present: Authorized representative of complainant with counsel for
complainant. Accused and his guarantor are absent.
Bailable warrants issued against the guarantor of accused received
back executed. Guarantor of accused has not appeared despite repeated calls.
Issue nonbailable warrants against the guarantor of accused.
List on 14.01.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
PNB Housing Finance Ltd. Vs. Sandeep Chaudhary
15.12.2015This is a fresh application under section 14 of the Securitization
and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act,
2002. It shall be checked and registered.
Present: Proxy counsel for applicant bank.
Proxy counsel for applicant bank prays for adjournment to produce
the original documents. At his request, the case is adjourned for consideration on
18.12.2015.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
PNB Housing Finance Ltd. Vs. Sanjeev Chaudhary
15.12.2015This is a fresh application under section 14 of the Securitization
and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act,
2002. It shall be checked and registered.
Present: Proxy counsel for applicant bank.
Proxy counsel for applicant bank prays for adjournment to produce
the original documents. At his request, the case is adjourned for consideration on
18.12.2015.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
C.C.No. 13560/1/10
15.12.2015
Present: None.
By order passed by the Ld. MM (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi this case
has been ordered to be transferred to Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
Accordingly, file be put up before Ld. CMM of the said district on date
fixed.
Case file, complete in all respects, be sent to the court of Ld. CMM of the
said district.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate(North) Delhi. 15.12.2015
C.C.No. 138/1/15
15.12.2015
Present: None.
By order passed by the Ld. MM (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi this case
has been ordered to be transferred to Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
Accordingly, file be put up before Ld. CMM of the said district on date
fixed.
Case file, complete in all respects, be sent to the court of Ld. CMM of the
said district.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate(North) Delhi. 15.12.2015
C.C.No. 772/1/06
15.12.2015
Present: None.
By order passed by the Ld. MM (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi this case
has been ordered to be transferred to West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
Accordingly, file be put up before Ld. CMM of the said district on date
fixed.
Case file, complete in all respects, be sent to the court of Ld. CMM of the
said district.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate(North) Delhi. 15.12.2015
C.C.No. 71/1/14
15.12.2015
Present: None.
By order passed by the Ld. MM (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi this case
has been ordered to be transferred to Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
Accordingly, file be put up before Ld. CMM of the said district on date
fixed.
Case file, complete in all respects, be sent to the court of Ld. CMM of the
said district.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate(North) Delhi. 15.12.2015
C.C.No. 13433/1/10
15.12.2015
Present: None.
By order passed by the Ld. MM (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi this case
has been ordered to be transferred to Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
Accordingly, file be put up before Ld. CMM of the said district on date
fixed.
Case file, complete in all respects, be sent to the court of Ld. CMM of the
said district.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate(North) Delhi. 15.12.2015
C.C.No. 13529/1/10
15.12.2015
Present: None.
By order passed by the Ld. MM (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi this case
has been ordered to be transferred to Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
Accordingly, file be put up before Ld. CMM of the said district on date
fixed.
Case file, complete in all respects, be sent to the court of Ld. CMM of the
said district.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate(North) Delhi. 15.12.2015
C.C.No. 164/1/14
15.12.2015
Present: None.
By order passed by the Ld. MM (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi this case
has been ordered to be transferred to Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
Accordingly, file be put up before Ld. CMM of the said district on date
fixed.
Case file, complete in all respects, be sent to the court of Ld. CMM of the
said district.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate(North) Delhi. 15.12.2015
C.C.No. 2913/07
15.12.2015
Present: None.
By order passed by the Ld. MM (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi this case
has been ordered to be transferred to West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
Accordingly, file be put up before Ld. CMM of the said district on date
fixed.
Case file, complete in all respects, be sent to the court of Ld. CMM of the
said district.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate(North) Delhi. 15.12.2015
C.C.No. 14/1/15
15.12.2015
Present: None.
By order passed by the Ld. MM (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi this case
has been ordered to be transferred to Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
Accordingly, file be put up before Ld. CMM of the said district on date
fixed.
Case file, complete in all respects, be sent to the court of Ld. CMM of the
said district.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate(North) Delhi. 15.12.2015
C.C.No. 387/1/15
15.12.2015
Present: None.
By order passed by the Ld. MM (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi this case
has been ordered to be transferred to Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
Accordingly, file be put up before Ld. CMM of the said district on date
fixed.
Case file, complete in all respects, be sent to the court of Ld. CMM of the
said district.
(Ashish Aggarwal) Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate(North) Delhi. 15.12.2015
C.C.No. 13762/09
15.12.2015
Present: None.
By order passed by the Ld. MM (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi this case
has been ordered to be transferred to West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
Accordingly, file be put up before Ld. CMM of the said district on date
fixed.
Case file, complete in all respects, be sent to the court of Ld. CMM of the
said district.
(Ashish Aggarwal)
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate(North) Delhi. 15.12.2015
C.C.No. 75/1/14
15.12.2015
Present: None.
By order passed by the Ld. MM (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi this case
has been ordered to be transferred to New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, Delhi.
Accordingly, file be put up before Ld. CMM of the said district on date
fixed.
Case file, complete in all respects, be sent to the court of Ld. CMM of the
said district.
(Ashish Aggarwal)
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate(North) Delhi. 15.12.2015
C.C.No. 21/1/14
15.12.2015
Present: None.
By order passed by the Ld. MM (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi this case
has been ordered to be transferred to East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi.
Accordingly, file be put up before Ld. CMM of the said district on date
fixed.
Case file, complete in all respects, be sent to the court of Ld. CMM of the
said district.
(Ashish Aggarwal)
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate(North) Delhi. 15.12.2015
C.C.No. 13815/1/06
15.12.2015
Present: None.
By order passed by the Ld. MM (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi this case
has been ordered to be transferred to West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
Accordingly, file be put up before Ld. CMM of the said district on date
fixed.
Case file, complete in all respects, be sent to the court of Ld. CMM of the
said district.
(Ashish Aggarwal)
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate(North) Delhi. 15.12.2015
C.C.No. 186/1/14
15.12.2015
Present: None.
By order passed by the Ld. MM (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi this case
has been ordered to be transferred to East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi.
Accordingly, file be put up before Ld. CMM of the said district on date
fixed.
Case file, complete in all respects, be sent to the court of Ld. CMM of the
said district.
(Ashish Aggarwal)
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate(North) Delhi. 15.12.2015
C.C.No. 252/1/15
15.12.2015
Present: None.
By order passed by the Ld. MM (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi this case
has been ordered to be transferred to West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
Accordingly, file be put up before Ld. CMM of the said district on date
fixed.
Case file, complete in all respects, be sent to the court of Ld. CMM of the
said district.
(Ashish Aggarwal)
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate(North) Delhi. 15.12.2015
C.C.No. 7346/01/07
15.12.2015
Present: None.
By order passed by the Ld. MM (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi this case
has been ordered to be transferred to West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
Accordingly, file be put up before Ld. CMM of the said district on date
fixed.
Case file, complete in all respects, be sent to the court of Ld. CMM of the
said district.
(Ashish Aggarwal)
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate(North) Delhi. 15.12.2015
C.C.No. 13435/1/10
15.12.2015
Present: None.
By order passed by the Ld. MM (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi this case
has been ordered to be transferred to Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
Accordingly, file be put up before Ld. CMM of the said district on date
fixed.
Case file, complete in all respects, be sent to the court of Ld. CMM of the
said district.
(Ashish Aggarwal)
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate(North) Delhi. 15.12.2015
C.C.No. 162/1/14
15.12.2015
Present: None.
By order passed by the Ld. MM (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi this case
has been ordered to be transferred to Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
Accordingly, file be put up before Ld. CMM of the said district on date
fixed.
Case file, complete in all respects, be sent to the court of Ld. CMM of the
said district.
(Ashish Aggarwal)
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate(North) Delhi. 15.12.2015
C.C.No. 157/1/14
15.12.2015
Present: None.
By order passed by the Ld. MM (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi this case
has been ordered to be transferred to Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
Accordingly, file be put up before Ld. CMM of the said district on date
fixed.
Case file, complete in all respects, be sent to the court of Ld. CMM of the
said district.
(Ashish Aggarwal)
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate(North) Delhi. 15.12.2015
C.C.No. 203/1/13
15.12.2015
Present: None.
By order passed by the Ld. MM (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi this case
has been ordered to be transferred to South East District, Saket Courts, Delhi.
Accordingly, file be put up before Ld. CMM of the said district on date
fixed.
Case file, complete in all respects, be sent to the court of Ld. CMM of the
said district.
(Ashish Aggarwal)
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate(North) Delhi. 15.12.2015
C.C.No. 13560/1/10
15.12.2015
Present: None.
By order passed by the Ld. MM (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi this case
has been ordered to be transferred to Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
Accordingly, file be put up before Ld. CMM of the said district on date
fixed.
Case file, complete in all respects, be sent to the court of Ld. CMM of the
said district.
(Ashish Aggarwal)
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate(North) Delhi. 15.12.2015
CC No. 377/1/13
15.12.2015Present: None.
Nobody has appeared on behalf of the complainant. Complainant
had also not appeared on the last eight dates of hearing. As per report on notice,
the complainant has also not been residing at the given address. In these
circumstances, the complaint is dismissed in default and for nonprosecution. File
be consigned to record room.
(Ashish Aggarwal)Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
CC No. 356/1/15
15.12.2015Present: Complainant in person.
There is no report regarding previous process. Let fresh notice be
issued as per previous order returnable on 03.03.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal)Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
CC No. 545/1/15
15.12.2015Present: None.
Nobody has appeared on behalf of the complainant. Last and final
opportunity is granted to the complainant to appear and to prosecute this case.
Renotify on 15.03.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal)Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR No. 187/08PS Alipur
15.12.2015Present: None for State.
Accused with counsel.
No PW is present today. Put up for PE on 17.02.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal)Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR No. 288/10PS Alipur
15.12.2015Present: None for State.
None for accused.
Report on bailable warrants is perused. Let notice be issued to the
surety of the accused returnable on 25.02.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal)Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR No. 437/12PS Alipur
15.12.2015Present: None.
Neither Ld. APP nor the accused persons have appeared. On the
last two dates of hearing too, the accused persons had not appeared. Let bailable
warrants in the sum of Rs.15,000/ be issued against the accused persons.
List on 02.03.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal)Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR No. 394/04PS Alipur
15.12.2015Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.
None for accused.
Report of process server who executed the process under Section
82 of Criminal Procedure Code is on record. Ld. Substitute APP submits that the
process has been duly executed. He states that there is no requirement of
recording statement of process server as it would only delay the case.
In view of the report of process server and persistent absence of
accused, the Court is satisfied that accused has absconded. He is declared
absconder. Intimation in this regard be sent to concerned SHO. File be consigned
to record room to be revived as and when the accused is found.
(Ashish Aggarwal)Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR No. 577/14PS Alipur
15.12.2015Present: None.
Accused persons have not appeared despite repeated calls. Issue
bailable warrants in the sum of Rs.5,000/ against the accused persons returnable
on 22.03.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal)Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR No. 879/14PS Alipur
15.12.2015Present: None.
Presence of the accused could not be secured through bailable
warrants. Issue nonbailable warrants against the accused to be executed through
the SHO returnable on 16.03.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal)Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR No. 817/14PS Alipur
15.12.2015Present: None for State.
None for accused.
Accused has not appeared. On the last date of hearing also accused
had not appeared. Issue bailable warrants in the sum of Rs.15,000/ against the
accused returnable on 23.02.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal)Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR No. 619/15PS Alipur
15.12.2015Present: None.
As per report, the address of the accused is not complete. IO is
directed to explain whether he had verified the address of the accused before
submitting the chargesheet. Let notice be issued to the IO for the said
explanation.
List on 09.03.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal)Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR No. 354/13PS Alipur
15.12.2015Present: None.
Accused has not appeared. In the interest of justice, accused is
granted one more opportunity to appear.
Renotify on 22.03.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal)Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR No. 173/08PS Alipur
15.12.2015Present: None for State.
None for accused.
Accused has not appeared despite repeated calls. In the interest of
justice, accused is granted one more opportunity to appear.
List on 16.03.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal)Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR No. 67/10PS Crime Branch
15.12.2015Present: None for State.
None for accused.
No PW is present today. Accused has not appeared. He is granted
one more opportunity to appear.
List on 22.02.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal)Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR No. 364/09PS Alipur
15.12.2015Present: None for State.
Counsel for accused.
Counsel for accused has filed an application for exemption from
personal appearance on behalf of accused. Heard arguments. For the reasons
stated in the application, the same is allowed and the said accused is exempted
from his personal appearance for today only.
Put up for appearance of accused and for PE on 25.05.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal)Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR No. 178/07PS Alipur
15.12.2015Present: None for State.
All accused persons on bail with counsel.
No PW is present today. Put up for PE on 17.03.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal)Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR No. 157/97PS Alipur
15.12.2015Present: None for State.
Accused with counsel.
PW Sunder has been served with summons yet he has not appeared.
Let bailable warrants in the sum of Rs.15,000/ be issued against him returnable
on 11.01.2016.
(Ashish Aggarwal)Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR No. 1071/14PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. Substitute APP for State.
A letter has been received under the signatures of Sh. Vikramjit
Singh, Dy. Commissioner of Police, Outer District, Delhi. The said letter is
perused and the same is found to be satisfactory.
Let the complainant be called before the court on the next date of
hearing.
List for appearance of the complainant on 02.02.2016.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal)Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR No. 1487/14PS S. P. Badli
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under Section 138
of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.
This is a police report. It alleges commission of offence under Section 3 of
Delhi Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 2007. As per allegations, the accused had
affixed a board on an electricity pole.
Section 3 of the said Act punishes defacement of property by “writing or
marking”. The placing of a board on an electricity pole does not amount to defacement by
writing or marking as held by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of T. S. Marwah Vs.
State 2008 (4) JCC 2561. Although the said decision was rendered in the context of Section
3 of the West Bengal Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 1976, the decision equally
applies to the present case since the provisions of Section 3 of the West Bengal Prevention
of Defacement of Property Act, 1976 are analogous to that of Section 3 of Delhi Prevention
of Defacement of Property Act, 2007. Hence, Section 3 of Delhi Prevention of Defacement
of Property Act, 2007 is not attracted to the facts of the present case. Cognizance is
declined. Proceedings are dropped. The police report is rejected. Bail bonds of the accused
are cancelled. His surety is discharged. Case property, if any, be returned to the rightful
claimant. File be consigned to record room.
Though the accused is discharged under 3 D.P.D.P Act, let the matter be
brought to the notice of concerned officials of MCD.
Let the copy of this order along with copy of the police report be sent to the
officer concerned MCD, North.
Let the copy of this order be sent to MHC(M) concerned.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal)Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi/15.12.2015
FIR No. 1437/14PS S. P. Badli
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under Section 138
of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.
This is a police report. It alleges commission of offence under Section 3 of
Delhi Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 2007. As per allegations, the accused had
affixed a board on an electricity pole.
Section 3 of the said Act punishes defacement of property by “writing or
marking”. The placing of a board on an electricity pole does not amount to defacement by
writing or marking as held by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of T. S. Marwah Vs.
State 2008 (4) JCC 2561. Although the said decision was rendered in the context of Section
3 of the West Bengal Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 1976, the decision equally
applies to the present case since the provisions of Section 3 of the West Bengal Prevention
of Defacement of Property Act, 1976 are analogous to that of Section 3 of Delhi Prevention
of Defacement of Property Act, 2007. Hence, Section 3 of Delhi Prevention of Defacement
of Property Act, 2007 is not attracted to the facts of the present case. Cognizance is
declined. Proceedings are dropped. The police report is rejected. Bail bonds of the accused
are cancelled. His surety is discharged. Case property, if any, be returned to the rightful
claimant. File be consigned to record room.
Though the accused is discharged under 3 D.P.D.P Act, let the matter be
brought to the notice of concerned officials of MCD.
Let the copy of this order along with copy of the police report be sent to the
officer concerned MCD, North.
Let the copy of this order be sent to MHC(M) concerned.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal)Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi/15.12.2015
FIR No. 1395/14PS S. P. Badli
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under Section 138
of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.
This is a police report. It alleges commission of offence under Section 3 of
Delhi Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 2007. As per allegations, the accused had
affixed a board on an electricity pole.
Section 3 of the said Act punishes defacement of property by “writing or
marking”. The placing of a board on an electricity pole does not amount to defacement by
writing or marking as held by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of T. S. Marwah Vs.
State 2008 (4) JCC 2561. Although the said decision was rendered in the context of Section
3 of the West Bengal Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 1976, the decision equally
applies to the present case since the provisions of Section 3 of the West Bengal Prevention
of Defacement of Property Act, 1976 are analogous to that of Section 3 of Delhi Prevention
of Defacement of Property Act, 2007. Hence, Section 3 of Delhi Prevention of Defacement
of Property Act, 2007 is not attracted to the facts of the present case. Cognizance is
declined. Proceedings are dropped. The police report is rejected. Bail bonds of the accused
are cancelled. His surety is discharged. Case property, if any, be returned to the rightful
claimant. File be consigned to record room.
Though the accused is discharged under 3 D.P.D.P Act, let the matter be
brought to the notice of concerned officials of MCD.
Let the copy of this order along with copy of the police report be sent to the
officer concerned MCD, North.
Let the copy of this order be sent to MHC(M) concerned.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal)Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi/15.12.2015
FIR No. 1417/14PS S. P. Badli
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under Section 138
of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.
This is a police report. It alleges commission of offence under Section 3 of
Delhi Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 2007. As per allegations, the accused had
affixed a board on an electricity pole.
Section 3 of the said Act punishes defacement of property by “writing or
marking”. The placing of a board on an electricity pole does not amount to defacement by
writing or marking as held by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of T. S. Marwah Vs.
State 2008 (4) JCC 2561. Although the said decision was rendered in the context of Section
3 of the West Bengal Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 1976, the decision equally
applies to the present case since the provisions of Section 3 of the West Bengal Prevention
of Defacement of Property Act, 1976 are analogous to that of Section 3 of Delhi Prevention
of Defacement of Property Act, 2007. Hence, Section 3 of Delhi Prevention of Defacement
of Property Act, 2007 is not attracted to the facts of the present case. Cognizance is
declined. Proceedings are dropped. The police report is rejected. Bail bonds of the accused
are cancelled. His surety is discharged. Case property, if any, be returned to the rightful
claimant. File be consigned to record room.
Though the accused is discharged under 3 D.P.D.P Act, let the matter be
brought to the notice of concerned officials of MCD.
Let the copy of this order along with copy of the police report be sent to the
officer concerned MCD, North.
Let the copy of this order be sent to MHC(M) concerned.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal)Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi/15.12.2015
FIR No. 955/14PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files as per
Negotiable Instruments Amendment Ordinance.
Present: Ld. APP for State.Complainant Mr. Chander Veer in person.
Report is perused. Complainant submits that he has no objection if
the untraced report is accepted. Statement of complainant is recorded separately
in this regard.
Elaborate investigation has been carried out by the investigating
agency. Despite efforts of the investigating agency, stolen articles have not been
recovered and offender could not be traced. Untraced report is accepted in view
of the statement of the complainant recorded today. File be sent back to
concerned police station with copy of this order and be preserved to be reopened
as and when any clue is found. Copy thereof shall be retained in the Court with
the original ordersheet and shall be consigned to record room after due
compliance.
Copy of this order be given dasti to the complainant, as prayed.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR No. 1184/14PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files as per
Negotiable Instruments Amendment Ordinance.
Present: Ld. APP for State.Complainant Mr. Jodha Singh in person.
Report is perused. Complainant submits that he has no objection if
the untraced report is accepted. Statement of complainant is recorded separately
in this regard.
Elaborate investigation has been carried out by the investigating
agency. Despite efforts of the investigating agency, stolen articles have not been
recovered and offender could not be traced. Untraced report is accepted in view
of the statement of the complainant recorded today. File be sent back to
concerned police station with copy of this order and be preserved to be reopened
as and when any clue is found. Copy thereof shall be retained in the Court with
the original ordersheet and shall be consigned to record room after due
compliance.
Copy of this order be given dasti to the complainant, as prayed.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR No. 536/13PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files as per
Negotiable Instruments Amendment Ordinance.
Present: Ld. APP for State.Complainant Mr. Navneet Kumar in person.
Report is perused. Complainant submits that he has no objection if
the untraced report is accepted. Statement of complainant is recorded separately
in this regard.
Elaborate investigation has been carried out by the investigating
agency. Despite efforts of the investigating agency, stolen articles have not been
recovered and offender could not be traced. Untraced report is accepted in view
of the statement of the complainant recorded today. File be sent back to
concerned police station with copy of this order and be preserved to be reopened
as and when any clue is found. Copy thereof shall be retained in the Court with
the original ordersheet and shall be consigned to record room after due
compliance.
Copy of this order be given dasti to the complainant, as prayed.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal) Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR No. 726/14PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. Substitute APP for State.
A letter has been received under the signatures of Sh. Vikramjit
Singh, Dy. Commissioner of Police, Outer District, Delhi. The said letter is
perused and the same is found to be satisfactory.
Let the complainant be called before the court on the next date of
hearing.
List for appearance of the complainant on 02.02.2016.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal)Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR No. 278/15PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.IO is not present.LRs of the deceased is not present.
Fresh court notice be issued to the LRs of the deceased through
their counsel S. K Gupta for the next date of hearing.
List on 08.02.2016.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal)Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR No. 393/13PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.IO is not present.LRs of the deceased is not present.
Fresh court notice be issued to the LRs of the deceased Ms. Mala
Devi for appearance before the court on the next date of hearing.
Court notice also be issued to the counsel Sh. S. Murli Manoharam,
for the complainant, to appear in person before the court on the next date of
hearing.
List on 08.02.2016.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal)Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR No. 655/15PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.Applicant/IO SI Vijay Kumar from MACT.Sh. Gurdeep Singh, son of the superdar in person.Sh. Mohan Singh, Superdar is not present.
The aforementioned son of the superdar submits that he could not
arrange the FDR amount and he is ready to surrender the vehicle in question. He
also submits that the permission may be granted to get the vehicle released upon
submitting the FDR amount. Submissions are heard and record is perused.
Applicant/IO SI Vijay Kumar is directed to take the vehicle bearing
registration no. DL1LP9533, in his custody and file the report thereof before
this court within two days.
Liberty is granted to the superdar to move a fresh application for
submitting the FDR amount in terms of order dated 10.12.2015.
In the interest of justice, the matter is kept pending.
Let the copy of this order be given to the son of the superdar and
the applicant/IO.
Matter shall now be taken up on 28.01.2016.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal)Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR No. 264/07PS Alipur
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.Accused with counsel.
Matter is listed for PE. PW6 HC Virender is present. He is
examinedinchief and partly crossexamined. His remaining crossexamination
is deferred due to paucity of time.
Put up for remaining crossexamination of PW6 on 15.02.2016.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal)Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015
FIR No. 1532/14PS Prashant Vihar
15.12.2015Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in dealing with transfer files under Section 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act.
Present: Ld. Substitute APP for State.Accused Kanchan Arora with counsel.
Previously, the accused has filed an application for plea bargaining. Today,
accused submits that she wishes to withdraw the said application for plea bargaining. Her
statement, to this effect, is recorded on the application itself. In view of her statement, the
application is dismissed as withdrawn.
At this stage, accused submits that she wishes to plead guilty. Accused has
pleaded guilty to the offence punishable under Section 3 of Delhi Prevention of Defacement of
Property Act, 2007. Accused is informed about the consequences of pleading guilty. She
however reiterates her plea of guilt. Her statement is recorded separately. In view of the
voluntary plea of guilt by accused, she is convicted of offence punishable under Section 3 of
Delhi Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 2007.
Arguments on the point of sentence are heard. Having regard to the fact that
accused has voluntarily admitted her mistake and has not tried to put up a false defence, a
lenient view is warranted. Regard is also had to the antecedents, age and character of the
offender, which preeminently show that there is a high possibility of reformation. For offence
under Section 3 of Delhi Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 2007, convict is sentenced
to pay fine of Rs.5,000/. In default of payment of fine, the convict shall undergo simple
imprisonment for ten days. Fine is paid. Bail bonds of convict are cancelled. Her surety is
discharged. Original documents, if any, be returned to the rightful claimant against
acknowledgment. Endorsement, if any, be also cancelled. Case property be disposed off through
District Nazir. Copy of this order be sent to the concerned MHC(M). The case is disposed off.
File be consigned to record room.
(Harjeet Singh Jaspal)Reliever Metropolitan Magistrate (North)
Delhi 15.12.2015