Caterina Camerani, Pulp and Performance Chemicals,...
Transcript of Caterina Camerani, Pulp and Performance Chemicals,...
Sustainability tools at AkzoNobel
Caterina Camerani,Pulp and Performance Chemicals, AkzoNobel
The world of AkzoNobel
2AkzoNobel company presentation | 2014All figures relate to 2013
North America 15% Mature Europe 38% Asia Pacific 25%
Other countries 3%Emerging Europe 8%Latin America 11%
Revenue by end-user segmentBuildings and Infrastructure 44%Transportation 16%Consumer Goods 16%Industrial 24%
Revenue by Business AreaDecorative Paints 28%Performance Coatings 38%Specialty Chemicals 34%
Key regions by revenue
Business is sustainabilitySustainability is business
3Company presentation | 2014
Sustainability strategic targets
AkzoNobel ranked #1 in 2014 Dow Jones Sustainability Index for the Materials industry group
REI(Resource Efficiency Index) A new indicator measuringhow efficiently we generate value expressed as cradle-to-gravecarbon footprint divided by gross profit
of revenue by 2020 from products that are more sustainablefor our customers than the products of our competitors, the Netherlands.
20%
25-30%more efficient resource and energy use across the entirevalue chain by 2020 (measured by carbon footprint reduction)
CONTENT
1. Sustainable Fresh Water Risk AssesmentBusiness Case for Water Sustainability
SFRWA tool
Water Facts & Figures AkzoNobel 2013
2. From Waste to By-productZero Waste vision
From Waste to By-product: an 8 step approach
AkzoNobel’s achievements in waste reduction
3. Fiber use optimization
RD&I at AkzoNobel
Eka BleachSim tool
Support work, examples
5
Sustainable Fresh Water Risk Assesment
Business Case for Water Sustainability
SFRWA tool
Water Facts & Figures AkzoNobel 2013
6
Fresh Water as an Ecosystem service
Ecosystems provide us with multiple ecosystem services, the provision of fresh waterbeing one of them. They also deliver other services related to the availability and quality ofwater:§ Water regulation§ Water purification§ Water retention§ Aquifers recharge§ Flood control
Source: The Nature Conservancy
People and companies’ ability to extract and utilize water resources can easily overcomethe ability of our ecosystems to provide them in the quantity or quality for which they arebeing used.
7
Water matters for AkzoNobelBusiness Case for Water Sustainability
Risk / Opportunity area Upstream Production process Product use
Physical /Operational
Commodity prices spikes Disruption in water supply Availability allowing for scales
Regulatory Early lobbing to raisestandards and securesupply
Suspend license to operate Assurance of water rights
Reputational Suppliers singled out forviolations
Business to be viewed asvillain taking water from people
Marketing advantagestowards consumers
Environmental Enhancement ofproducing ecosystems
Affecting health of employeesImpact on ecosystem
Healthy markets vulnerability
Financial Raw material pricesincrease
Increase cost of water andecosystem services increases
New technologies andproducts leading to newrevenues
Reflected and assessed in theSustainable Fresh Water Risk Assessment
Jan-FebPublication of current
status in internal andexternal reporting
Feb-AprSites create/updateimprovement plans
Aug-NovSites carry out
self-assessment
Individual site supportwhere required
May-JulAnnouncements of
upcoming assessment
Trainings and (individual) support
8
Sustainable Fresh Water Risk Assessment
Dec -FebDetailed analyses per site providing
input for site improvement plans
Preparation
Communication& Training
Data Entry
Data Analysis
Reporting
Improvement
Jan-AprPreparation of training and communication material
Contact sites and update site editors and reviewers
Sustainable Fresh Water Risk AssessmentSFWRA Tool - Microsoft Silverlight based Application
9
WBCSD
10
Sustainable Fresh Water Risk AssessmentSFWRA Tool - Connection to WBCSD Maps
The following information willbe gathered for all sites:
§ Annual Renewable Water Supplyper Person (1995)
§ Annual Renewable Water Supplyper Person (2025)
§ Access to Improved Sanitation
§ Access to Improved Water
§ Mean Annual Relative WaterStress Index
§Ratio of Industrial to Total WaterUse
11
Sustainable Fresh Water Risk AssessmentSFWRA Tool – Water Balance and assessmentin six key areas
Water Balance +Six key areas SFWRA:§ Water Sources
§ Supply Reliability
§ Water Discharge
§ Efficiency
§ Compliance
§ Social Context
12
Sustainable Fresh Water Risk AssessmentSFWRA Tool - Reporting with Improvement Suggestions
A. Comprehensive Report (PDF)§ Generic data§ 6 maps§ Water balance (if necessary)§ Water assessment§ Results, incl. spider, comments, traffic lights§ User data
B. Summary Report (PDF)§ Generic data§ Results, incl. spider, comments, traffic lights
C. Reports for visitors (restricted)§ Report with all (overview and xls)§ Report per BU (overview and xls)§ Report per location (pdf)
13
Water Facts & Figures AkzoNobel 2013
14
Sustainable Fresh Water Risk AssessmentStatus 2013
To achieve sustainable fresh water management at allour manufacturing sites in 2015
15
From Waste to By-product
Zero Waste vision
From Waste to By-product: an 8 step approach
AkzoNobel’s achievements in waste reduction
16
What do you see?
§Waste§ Costs§ Environmental impact§ Occupational health related issues§ Unhappy stakeholders
PROBLEMS!
§ Raw material§ Economic profit§ Reduced footprint§ Added value toour business§ Happy customers,investors andauthorities§ Positive socialimpact
POSSIBILITIES!
17
Zero Waste Vision: How to make it happen?
”Zero Discharge Mindset” is the answer
2. Fully convert existing waste streams intouseful products or valuable raw materials.Often this is more efficient (quicker andrequires less investments).
1. Pollution prevention strategies: rawmaterial and process optimization(f.e. R&D projects)
18
Operational Eco-Efficiency: common themes
19
From Waste to By-product: an 8 step approach
Congratulations!You have now a by-product!
Congratulations!You have now converted aNRW stream into a moresustainable RW
AcrobatDocument
AcrobatDocument
AkzoNobel at 4 sites in Sweden, Norwayand VenezuelaAlOx to cement industry and reclassification to by-product
20
Historic situationAlOx (Aluminiumoxide, a by-product ofH2O2 production) was disposed of as waste.
Current situationClient company uses AlOx as a rawmaterial for their cement production inSweden, Norway and Venezuela.
New EU waste framework directive andVenezuela environmental waste legislationallow for reclassification of AlOx intoby-product.
Result• Waste reduced with 2,200 ton per year• Venezuela site towards zero waste
production site• Environmental benefit by using AlOx as raw
material for other industry• Lower tariff for both AlOx and transport
AkzoNobel inTaiwanFilter cake to bricks industry and reclassification to by-product
21
Historic situationFilter cake (SiO2 30%, water 70%), a restproduct of colloidal silica production wasdisposed of as waste.
Current situationClient company uses filter cake as replacementfor sand raw material in their brick production inTaiwan.
Standard 3 allows for reclassification of filtercake into by-product.
Result• Waste reduced with 630 ton per year• Environmental benefit by using silica cake
as raw material for other industry
AkzoNobel in Canada and BrazilBrine purification sludge to farmers for soil acidity control or fertilizerand reclassification to by-product
22
Historic situationBrine purification sludge (CaCO3 55%, MgCO3 6%, restwater), a rest product of raw material purification in chlorateproduction, was disposed of as waste.
Current SituationThe Canadian sites hired an agronomist group who reusesthe brine sludge as replacement for commercial limestone,the product bought by farmers to control soil acidity.The group works together with the Environmentalauthorities to get all the permits needed.
In Brazil, client company (local producer of organicfertilizers) uses it as component in fertilizers type D (onlycitrus, eucalyptus, sugar cane, coffee and flowers )
Result• Waste reduced with 1,800 ton per year• Environmental benefits by using brine sludge instead
of natural limestone• Environmental analyses, permits, transport and
trucks covered by fee to agronomist group
Historic situationVirgin HCl was bought for regenerationof the ion exchange resin in the silicaplant. It was also used for pH adjustmentof waste water.
Current SituationA local manufacturer delivers his HClstream as a raw material to our site.
Result• No need for local supplier to
neutralize its HCl waste streambefore it could discharge via wastewater treatment plant
• Lower tariff for HCl
AkzoNobel in North AmericaReusing a HCl waste stream as raw material
23
Historic SituationTW 2009 = 18442 tTW/PQ 2009 = 12,09 kg/t
Current SituationTW 2014 R4Q = 9740 tTW/PQ 2013 R4Q = 6,31 kg/t
Result• 2014 R4Q vs 2009 TW = - 47%• 2014 R4Q vs 2009 TW/PQ = - 48%
Pulp & Performance Chemicals Results
24
Conclusions
25
Waste to By-product toolkit helps to convert materials from waste to by-products and this means:
§ Key activity in reducing waste, ultimately leading to zero waste
§ Avoid waste disposal cost and generating income (up to ~500 €/ton)
§ Common practice in several Business Units across all three Business Areaswithin AkzoNobel
26
Fiber use optimization
RD&I at AkzoNobel
Eka BleachSim tool
Support work, examples
27
§ Research and development of sustainablechemistry and business concepts that:innovatively respond to customer needs,strengthen customer businesses,decrease environmental impact
§ R&D about 2 % of sales
§ Cooperation with leading universities
§ Main R&D facilities in Bohus, Sweden,with additional units in Sundsvall,Sweden, Gunsan, Korea, and Songjiang,China
Innovation and R&D
AkzoNobel Bleaching ChemicalsApplication R&D
28
Chemical pulp– Bleaching technology– Reduced fresh water consumption (closure aspects)– Life Cycle Assessment– Support to our customers
Mechanical pulp bleaching– Bleaching technology– Energy reduction– Support to our customers
Biorefinary– Pulp and Paper mill applications
Other applications of hydrogen peroxide, chlorate, chlorine dioxide– NOx abatement– Bleaching outside P&P– Fish farming
Bleaching trendsDriving forces
§ Costs§ Pulp quality
- Brightness- Strength properties
§ Runnability
§ Environmental legislation- Water emissions (AOX, COD,..)- Emissions to air (NOx, SOx,..)
§ Market demand§ NGOs
29
Bleaching trendsBREF (BAT) document
30
§ The original BREF for the Pulp and Paper industry was started in 1997§ Finalized in 2000 and adopted by the European Commission in 2001.
§ The Review of the Best Available Techniques (BAT) forthe Pulp and Paper industry held its first plenary meeting November 2006.§ The final draft was planned to be finalized November 2008§ The final (third) draft was ready July 2013§ Decision was taken by the European Commission May 2014
The presented emission levels in BAT 2001 was recommendations, thelevels in BAT 2014 will be legislative
BREF = Best Available Techniques Reference Document
§ Environmental legislation- Water emissions (AOX, COD,..)- Emissions to air (NOx, SOx,..)
§ Market demand§ NGOs
Bleaching sequence
31
The choice of bleaching sequence and kappa number is dependent on:• Pulp quality• Environmental aspects• Cost• Investments• Runnability
§ Costs§ Pulp quality
- Brightness- Strength properties
§ Runnability
AkzoNobel Pulp Vision Database
32
§ Contains over 40 000 laboratory bleachedstages
§ Stores data created since mid 1980’s§ Wood raw material§ Pulping process§ Bleaching conditions (temp, pulp cons,
time)§ Chemical charges§ Incoming pulp properties (brightness,
kappa number, viscosity)§ Output (brightness, kappa number,
viscosity, pH, residual chemicals)§ Specific analysis made (metal profile, AOX,
etc.)
The model is based onlab bleaching results(Pulp Vision)
AkzoNobel BleachSim - Eucalyptus
33
D EOP D DIncomingBrightness 52Kappa 11,5Viscosity
Conditions Conditions Conditions ConditionsKF 0,200 Oxygen 0,22
ClO2 (a Cl) 23 H2O2 3ClO2 (aCl) 11
ClO2 (aCl) 5
pH 1,94 pH 10,7 pH 3,1 pH 4
Temperature 70 Temperature 90Temperature 65
Temperature 65
Time 60 Time 120 Time 240 Time 220P.C P.C P.C P.C
Results Results Results ResultsBrightness 53,6 Adjust 0,00 Brightness 69,9 Adjust 0,00 Brightness 82,6 Brightness 86,1Kappa 6,2Adjust 1,00 Kappa 3,2Adjust 1,00 Kappa 1,3 Kappa 0,8Viscosity Viscosity Viscosity Viscosity
Comparison between bleaching modeland laboratory bleaching
34
88
88.5
89
89.5
90
90.5
91
91.5
92
92.5
93
93.5
10 20 30 40 50
52 %ISO modell
58 %ISO modell
57 Mill B
52 Mill A
58 Mill C
52 Mill D
Final Brightness %ISO
Total aCl, kg/t
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
0 10 20 30 40
EPO Brightness %ISO
kg aCl in D0
Customer support work
35
§ Optimisation of the bleachplant conditions§ Trouble-shooting§ A discussion partner§ Improving pulp properties
Customer support workExamples
36
Bleaching efficiency§ By mapping the bleachplant and comparing the results with our
models and reference data, inefficient conditions in the D1 stagewas discovered and adjusted. The result was increased pulp viscosityand utilization of the bleaching chemicals.
§ Inefficient utilization of bleaching chemicals due to an unfavorabledistribution of the bleaching chemicals was discovered. Optimizationwork gave improved final brightness and a potential to reach otherpulp qualities.
§ Changing the bleaching conditions and chemical distribution between thestages reduced the brightness reversion of the final pulp.
§ Optimization of the bleachplant to reduce COD and AOX in the final effluentby modification of the conditions in the different stages made it possible tomeet the regulations.
§ Support to customers when selecting the bleaching sequence ingreenfield mills
Customer support workExamples
37
Scaling in D0-stage§ The problem was solved by optimizing the conditions in the
bleaching stage resulting in increased runnability§ The solution was found trough mapping the conditions and whitewater
circulations in the bleachplant
Reduced water usage§ By decreasing the bleaching work in the initial stage it was possible to
recirculate the alkaline filtrate towards the closed part of the mill leadingto a reduced water usage.
§ Speaking partner in closure related issues has made it possible for mills toreduce the water usage in the mill
Thank you for your attention!