Catalog BNAB 2012

7/21/2019 Catalog BNAB 2012

1/347


2/347

3

Cuprins / Content

1. Introducere

Introduction 5

2. Aniversri Aniversary Events 55

3. Expoziia concurs de proiecteDesign Competition Exibition 143

4. Manifestri conexe

Related Events 605

5. Organizatori, parteneri BNAB 2012

BNAB 2012 Organising Committee and Partners 619

Organizator Comisar BienalUniunea Arhitecilor din Romnia Prof.dr.arh. Cristina Olga GocimanPreedinte dr.arh. Viorica Curea

EditoriProf.dr.arh. Cristina Gociman Seciunile: Introducere , Aniversri, Manifestr i

conexe, Organizatori i parteneri BNAB 2012

Conf.dr.arh . Andra Panait Seciunea Expoziia Concurs de proiecte

Identitate vizual & graphic designConf.dr. arh. Andra Panait

CorecturArh. Maria Mnescu

2013, Editura Universitar Ion Mincu

A l b u m f i n a n a t d e A r C u B Centrul de Proiecte Culturale al Primriei Municipiului Bucureti

Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Naionale a RomnieiCatalogul proiectelor participante la Bienala Naional de ArhitecturBucureti 2012, Uniunea Arhitecilor din Romnia -Bucureti: EdituraUniversitar Ion Mincu, 2013

CONTENTCUPRINS


3/347

5

1 n cutarea justei msuri / Searching for the Proper Measure Proceduri pregtitoare B.N.A.B. 2012 / The 2012 Bucharest National Architecture Biennale - P Opinii despre B.N.A.B. 2012 / Opinions on the 2012 BNAB Raportul comisarului / Report of the 2012 B.N.A.B. Commissioner Locurile de desfurare a Bienalei / Biennale VenuesINTRODUCTIOINTRODUCER

5


4/347

7

Vlad Eftenie 2012


5/347

9

Searching for the ProperMeasure

The idea ofmeasure , highly appreciated in ancient Greek, meant harmony, balance, charineswisdom and it found its place not only in philosophy but also, through concrete presenthis large perspective, we are searching for a propermeasure . After 1992, the Union of Architects from Romahas organized the Bucharest Architecture Biennale. On this occasion the projects elaboryears are selected for the contest and from these projects, the specialized juries are nominthe works they find to be the best.This year, for the 10th Bucharest National Architecture Biennale, the two years time fram

we introduced time loop, works and personalities from the past in the exhibition RomanPatrimony starting from the end of the 19th century, highlighting especially the personMincu, and reaching to present works, urban perspective studies until 2020, including alstudents. The analyzed sections encompass a large spread of works, including architecturrestoration works, written words, etc.What are we learning for the future, what are the conclusions, what are the propermeasure and the perspectivefor the design of the future objectives? Globally, we are crossing a stage of searching fobuilt environment. Extravagantly luxuriously and high buildings are emerging in the UnitStates or Near East or Far East, up to China or Japan, but also ecologic constructions, witminimum cost for materials and the execution. Europe is searching for an impressive archialso for improving or expanding solutions for buildings started fifty years ago. For exampthe La Defense area, are forming an ensemble which is naturally continuing the existing swell thought concept, designed in harmony with the specific structure of this big metropolWhat would be the propermeasure for Bucharest? The international competition launched for Buchwas ignored and we are wondering when will the planning of a high ensemble in the arearesumed? The high buildings erected in the old parts of the city are not blending in t he ebut on the contrary, for example, the BANCOREX building was not assimilated in theaggressive vertical which is contrasting to the CEC palace and the entire historic compleThe reaction of the citizens and of the majority of the architects has succeeded in stoppinbeing erected, in contrast to the harmony of the area. In this way, the proposals for buildinbut many other buildings were erected in existing areas, against any reason and professioNational Architecture Biennale aims to be primarily a time for thinking about the road to professional practice, about cherishing the culture and the past and about finding a propermeasure for the future.

UAR PresidentPh.D. arch. Viorica Curea

Introducere / Introduction

n cutarea justeimsuri Ideea demsur , mult apreciat n Grecia Antic, nsemna armonie, echilibru, chibzuial, cumptare, nelepciunei ea i-a gsit locul nu numai n filozofie ci, printr-o reprezentare concret, i n arhitectur. n aceast perspectivlarg cutm o just msur. Din 1994, Uniunea Arhitecilor din Romnia a organizat Bienala de ArhitecturaBucureti. Cu aceast ocazie sunt s elecionate proiecte elaborate ntr-o perioad de doi ani care intr n concurs idin care juriile de specialitate nominalizeaz i premiaz lucrrile pe care le consider cele mai reuite. n acest an, la a zecea Bienal Naional de Arhitectur Bucureti, perioada de doi ani nu ni s-a prut elocvent i,de aceea am creat un arc peste timp, introducnd lucrri i personaliti din trecut n expoziia ,,Arhiteci RomniCreatori de Patrimoniu Cultural, care acoper o perioad ce pornete de la sfritul secolului al XIX-lea - prinmarcarea n mod special a personalitii arhitectului Ion Mincu - i ajunge pn la lucrri actuale, studii urbanede perspectiv pn n 2020, incluznd chiar i proiecte ale studenilor arhiteci. Seciunile analizate cuprind deci oplaj larg de lucrri, fiind incluse lucrri de arhitectur, urbanism, design, restaurri, cuvnt scris etc.Ce reinem pentru viitor, ce concluzii tragem, care este just a msur i perspectiva n care s concepem obiectiveleviitoare?Pe plan mondial trecem printr-o etap de cutri pentru ameliorarea mediului construit. Apar construcii de un luxi nlimi exorbitante n Emiratele Arabe Unite, n Statele Unite sau n Orientul Apropiat sau mai ndeprtat, pn n China sau Japonia, dar i construcii ecologice, cu o structur organic, cu un cost minim privind materialele iexecuia. n Europa se caut o arhitectur impresionant pentru construcii noi dar i ameliorarea sau extindereaunor ansambluri ncepute deja cu cincizeci de ani n ur m. De exemplu, construciile nalte grupate la Paris n zonaLa Dfense formeaz un ansamblu care continu firesc structura existent a oraului ntr-un concept bine gndit,compus n armonie cu structura specific acestei mari metropole.Care ar fi justamsur pentru Bucureti?Concursul internaional lansat pentru ,,Bucureti 2000 a fost ignorat i ne ntrebm cnd se va relua planificareaunui ansamblu cu regim mare de nlime n zona ,,Casei Poporului? Construciile nalte care au fost ridicate n zonele vechi ale oraului nu se integreaz armonios n ansamblul istoric existent, ci dimpotriv. Cldirea

,,BANCOREX, de exemplu, nu a fost asimilat n cursul anilor care au trecut, rmnnd i astzi o verticalagresiv care scoate din scar palatul CEC i tot ansamblul istoric constituit n timp.Reacia locuitorilor i a majoritii arhitecilor a reuit s stopeze alte construcii ieite din scara oraului i dinarmonia ansamblului. Aa s-au oprit propunerile de a se construi n Cimigiu, dar multe altele s-au materializat n construcii implantate n zone existente, mpotriva oricrei raiuni i culturi profesionale. Bienala Naional deArhitectur Bucureti se dorete a fi, n primul rnd, un moment de cugetare despre drumul pe care ar trebui s l urmeze practica profesional a arhitecilor, despre preuirea culturii i a trecutului i despre gsirea unei justemsuri pentru viitor.

Preedinte UARDr.arh. Viorica Curea


6/347

11

Vlad Eftenie 2012


7/347

13

The 2012 Bucharest National Architecture Biennale - 2011 PrAPPOINTING THE COMMISSIONERRegarding the 2006, 2008 and 2010 editions of the BAB, the UAR Senate accepted to assto ARHITECTURA review editorship. Once their collaboration with the respective revselected another team. Having in view the development of the 2010 edition when a honoappointed, they thought the commissioners appointment would settle the team matter bappointed commissioner was to make up his/her own team.In the autumn of 2011, they requested name suggestions from architecture higher educwas believed that ensuring the events theoretical and professional quality involved theUAR Senate appointed Professor Architect Cristina Gociman, Ph.D. from among a list oarchitects from various UAIM sections. Their choice was based on Mrs. Gocimans invBucharest OAR, having her expertise acquired by the organization of Architecture Annu

THE CONTEXTThe tenth edition of the 2012 Bucharest Architecture Biennale (original title) was tocontext conditioned by several new elements: the BAB overlapped the celebration of 120into being (preceding the UAR) and the early times of public architecture education aloof 100 years since the death of Ion Mincu, a famous professor, an innovator of Romaneconomic crisis circumstances.Taking the opportunity of the above-mentioned events to emphasize the BAB among owith regional or county extensions, it was decided to take the name Bucharest NationaThe change in its change resulted from the comments and debates on a potential correlatparticularly the Architecture Annual of Bucharest OAR, of the exhibitions of organizatio

DEFININIG THE THEMEThe themes of previous BAB editions have continuously evolved: the exhibition includinthe last 2 years made the passage to diversifying constituent sections and connecting the manifestations (conferences, workshops, debates etc.) which were increasingly numerouthe jury made up of members from our country gradually turned into several juries with Taking account of the crisis situation, the UAR recommended that the BNAB should rthe last two years outcomes subject to analyses, debates, thorough polls, critical endeavdouble both the event in the capital and the events generated by t he exhibitions itineratioprevious editions had already outlined the fact that too many collateral events could overeviewing the strengths and weaknesses of the recent architectural outcomes in Romania

Bienala Naional de Arhitectur Bucureti 2012 - Proceduri pregtitoare 2011NUMIREA COMISARULUIPentru ediiile din anii 2006, 2008 i 2010 ale BAB, Senatul UAR a acceptat atribuirea organizrii ctre echipaRedaciei revistei ARHITECTURA. Odat cu ncetarea colaborrii cu respectiva echip, s- a trecut la selectarea alteiechipe. Avnd n vedere modul de funcionare a ediiei din 2010, cnd s-a numit un comisar onorific, s-a apreciatc desemnarea comisarului va rezolva i problema echipei, prin faptul c acest comisar numit urma s-i formezeo echip proprie. n toamna anului 2011 s- au s olicitat propuneri de nume din cadrul nvmntului superior de arhitectur,considerndu-se c asigurarea nivelului teoretic i profesional al manifestrii impune implicarea unui cadrudidactic. Din lista coninnd numele a 3 colege, profesoare doctor arhitect din diverse seciuni ale UAIM, SenatulUAR a numit pe doamna Cristina Gociman. Alegerea a luat n considerare implicarea doamnei Gociman nactivitatea OAR Bucureti i experiena nsu it prin organizarea Anualelor de Arhitectur ale filialei din Capital.

CONTEXTULEdiia a X-a a Bienalei de Arhitectur Bucureti (titulatura originar) din 2012 urma s se desfoare ntr-uncontext deosebit, condiionat de cteva elemente inedite: suprapunerea BAB cu mplinirea a 120 de ani de lafondarea SAR (premergtoarea UAR) i nceputul nvmntului de stat n arhitectur i a 100 de ani de lamoartea lui Ion Mincu, profesor renumit i inovator al arhitecturii romneti. La aceste elemente comemoratives-a adugat, din pcate, i situaia de criz economic.Profitnd de evenimentele menionate pentru evidenierea BAB ntre alte manifestri de factur s imilar, dar deextensie regional sau judeean, s-a czut de acord ca denumirea s devin Bienala Naional de ArhitecturBucureti. Schimbarea denumirii a survenit i ca urmare a comentariilor i discuiilor legate de eventuala(posibila) corelare a tuturor manifestrilor s imilare, n spe Anuala de Arhitectur a OAR Bucureti, a expoziiilororganizaiilor din Timi, Suceava, Sibiu.

DEFINIREA TEMEITematica ediiilor anterioare ale BAB a evoluat continuu: de la expoziia cuprinznd producia de arhitectura ultimilor 2 ani, s-a trecut la diversificarea seciunilor componente i la nsoirea evenimentului principal cumanifestri colaterale (conferine, ateliere, dezbateri etc.), din ce n ce mai numeroase i variate. De as emenea, dela juriul cu membri din ar s -a trecut treptat la mai multe jurii cu membri din strintate mai numeroi.Avnd n vedere situaia de criz, recomandarea conducerii UAR a fost ca BNAB s revin la prezentarea producieipe ultimii 2 ani, care s fie exploatat prin analize, dezbateri, sondaje aprofundate, demersuri critice careurmau s dubleze deopotriv manifestarea din Capital i cele prilejuite de itinerarea expoziiei prin ar. Ediiileanterioare puseser n eviden faptul c prea multe evenimente colaterale pot umbri scopul principal: trecerea n revist a calitii i defectelor produciei recente de arhitectur din Romnia.


8/347

15

ECONOMIC ASPECTSIn compliance with the financial agreements of the latest BAB, t he UAR Senate providedfrom the Architecture Stamp Duty) in the budgets of 2011 and 2012. The UAR managamount made available and originally representing a quarter of the total cost would now third of it. This presumption was based on the difficulty in attracting sponsorship and onministries contribution (MDRT and MCPN) as a result of budget adjustments.It supposed radical changes in the 2010 BAB budget structure placed at the Commissioninformed. The entire event should have been made up of the architecture exhibition illus2011-2012 accompanied by critical comments, debates, analyses that it generated. The jout by only one jury mainly (if not wholly) made up of Romanian professionals to be mthe research and assessment of architecture in Romania. Thus, the events on the occasioof panels, symposia etc. could also pur sue the itineration about the country.

President of the Romanian Union of Architects (between 2009-Prof. Ph.D. Arch. Peter DERER

ASPECTE ECONOMICE n acord cu ncheierile financiare ale ultimei BAB, Senatul UAR a prevzut fondurile necesare ( din TimbrulArhitecturii) n bugetele pe 2011 i 2012. Conducerea UAR a avertizat c suma pus la dispoziie, care reprezenta nainte un sfert din costul t otal, va reprezenta acum probabil cca. o treime. Prezumarea s-a bazat pe dificultilede atragere a sponsorizrilor i pe posibila reducere a contribuiei ministerelor (MDRT i MCPN) ca urmare atierilor bugetare.Aceasta presupunea modificri radicale fa de structura bugetului BAB 2010, pus la dispoziia comisarului spreinformare. ntreaga manifestare ar fi trebuit s constea n expoziia de arhitectur ilustrnd producia anilor2011-2012, nsoit de comentarii, dezbateri, analize critice generate de aceasta. Jurizarea urma s fie efectuat

de un singur juriu, compus majoritar (dac nu integral) din profesioniti romni, care s se implice mai profund ncercetarea i evaluarea arhitecturii din Romnia. Astfel, manifestrile prilejuite de BAB - suita de mese rotunde,simpozioane etc. - puteau urmri i itinerarea prin ar.

Preedinte UAR (2009 mai 2012)Prof. dr. arh. Peter DERER


9/347

17

Vlad Eftenie 2012


10/347

19

JAMES F. HORAN - DipArch FRIAI RIBA MIDI ARBProfessor Emeritus, The Dublin School of Architecture, Ireland

The BNAB2012 in October/November of this year provided a wonderful opportunity forexperience the contemporary architecture of Romania.The Architectural projects which were visited ranged from very modest domestic workbuildings, to extremely large projects which had significant impact on the urban fabricwhich they were located.The assessment process involved visiting each building to fully understand its context, iand its detail. This experience of the actual building, as opposed to studying photographsmost useful of activities. It prompted a new and deeper level of discussion among the mea greater level of credibility to the Jurys decisions.Because of the geographical spread of the buildings to be visited, the task of the Jury waconsuming. Travelling conditions were often difficult and the shorter hours of daylightpresented particular challenges.Nevertheless, it cannot be underestimated how important and valuable the actual visits twere. Initial opinions based on the photographic and graphic submissions were often cmembers of the jury stood within the space, and experienced the full impact of the buintention behind it at close quarters.Generally the quality of the architectural work was very high, reaching exceptional levewas conscious of the difficulty in making comparisons and judgements about buildings, which differentiated substantially both in function and scale. For example, comparing tsculptural project like the tower within a tower was extremely difficult, as, although theythe scale, nature and the problems encountered in their realisation could be more differe

necessary to consider sub-sections based on scale and complexity in some of the existinwhich should be discussed and debated.The lecture series and exhibition which accompanied the work of the various juries aaspects of architecture, urban design, interior architecture, photography and design gmost informative and interesting. The coinciding of some of these lectures with studioUniversity of Architecture meant that many st udents missed the opportunity to attend anfascinating events.The BNAB was a full, rich and complex event. The organisers of the BNAB 2012 are tenormous effort they have clearly dedicated, and the consequential recognition that sucarchitectural profession and to those involved in architecture, design, and the educatioRomania.

JAMES F. HORAN - arhitect diplomat FRIAI RIBA MIDI ARBProfesor emerit, coala de Arhitectur din Dublin, Irlanda

BNAB 2012 (Bienala naional de arhitectur Bucureti) din octombrie / noiembrie anul acesta a oferit ooportunitate minunat membrilor Juriului de a experimenta arhitectura contemporan din Romnia.Proiectele de arhitectur care au fost vizitate au variat de la lucrri gospodreti foarte modeste, proiecte pentrucldiri comerciale i publice, pn la proiecte foarte mari care au avut un impact semnificativ asupra structurii

urbane i mediului nconjurtor n care sunt situate.Procesul de evaluare a implicat vizitarea fiecrei cldiri pentru a-i nelege pe deplin contextul, realizareaarhitectural i detaliile. Experiena cldirii concrete, spre deosebire de studierea fotografiilor i a desenelor, s-adovedit a fi cea mai util dintre activiti, determinnd un nivel nou i mai profund al discuiilor ntre membriijuriului i aducnd un plus de credibilitate n ceea ce privete deciziile acestora.Avnd n vedere aria larg de rspndire geografic a cldirilor care urmau s fie vizitate, sarcina juriului a fost n egal msur costisitoare i consumatoare de timp. Condiiile de cltorie au fost adesea dificile iar perioadascurt de expunere la lumin natural s pecific lunii octombrie a adugat un plus de dificultate.Cu toate acestea, nu putem subestima importana i valoarea vizitelor efective la fiecare cldire n parte. Primeleimpresii care au avut la baz fotografiile i desenele prezentate s-au schimbat adesea radical atunci cnd membriijuriului au vzut cu ochii lor spaiul respectiv i au simit impactul direct al cldirii i inteniile care au stat la bazaproiectului. n general, calitatea proiectelor de arhitectur a fost foarte ridicat, n unele cazuri atingnd chiarun nivel excepional. Juriul a fost contient de dificultatea de a face comparaii i judeci privind cldirile dinaceeai categorie, care se deosebeau n mod substanial din punct de vedere funcional sau prin scar. De exemplu,compararea arenei din Cluj cu un proiect sculptural de tipul turn n turn a fost extrem de dificil ntruct, deiambele sunt cldiri publice, scara, natura i problemele ntmpinate n realizarea acestora ar fi putut fi maidiferite. n viitor, ar fi necesar ca sub-seciunile s fie considerate pe baza scrii i complexitii n unele dintrecategoriile existente. Acesta este un subiect care ar trebui discutat i dezbtut.Seria de prelegeri i expoziia asociate activitii membrilor juriului i care au tratat multe aspecte legate dearhitectur, design urban, arhitectur de interior, fotografiile i proiectarea n general s-au dovedit a fi cele maiinformative i interesante. Desfurarea acestor prelegeri simultan cu orele de atelier din cadrul Universitii deArhitectur a nsemnat c muli studeni au ratat oportunitatea de a participa i de a experimenta multe dintreaceste evenimente fascinante.B.N.A.B. 2012 a fost un eveniment deplin, bogat i complex. Organizatorii trebuie felicitai pentru efortul enorm pecare n mod evident l-au depus i pentru recunoaterea pe care un astfel de eveniment o aduce profesiei de arh itecti celor implicai n arhitectur, design i st udierea acestor discipline n Romnia.


11/347

21

Ph.D. Arch.Rosa Cervera and Ph.D. Arch.Javier PiozProfessors at Polytechnic University, Madrid, Spain

Having the opportunity to be a member of the jury of the Biennale National of Architectto get in touch with todays prominent architectural world in Romania.The organization of the Biennale decided that the jury could visit all those buildings thastage of screening, which were considered appropriate. This approach to the selection not the usual biennial and other architectural competitions for the time and effort involvan amazing journey that could be called architect-venture and that allowed us to know tway you can, that is to visit and see it in person, appreciate its setting, its spatiality, the dphotograph is elusive.There were more than 20 buildings that we had a chance to visit, located in cities like BuNapoca and some rural places with great beauty, which sometimes is difficult to access. cultural image, where the main way of knowing art and architecture is often limited to thtransmits us, it was enormously instructive recovering direct confrontation with the buildthem alive and not delayed through nice, but sometimes misleading photographs.We had the occasion to feel the brilliance and quality of architecture of public and produscale works, such as stadiums and office buildings, to medium and small scales to procommitment to excellence is reflected in its implementation in place, in search of spacprogram, the design and the quality of care and construction details.The situation was different with the category of housing. Very few were collective housithe Biennial and also small and very exclusive those submitted as individual homes. Thehousing and even public advocacy, is possibly an indicator of time of low economic acticountry. We cannot do anything but regret this lack of leaves orphaned because of arch

Romania. On the other hand, and paradoxically, the examples presented individual homea tendency to greatness and the sur plus in contrast to the virtual absence of public housingsome past excesses and incorporating idioms and architectural design tell us of other natithrough the houses chosen by certain strata of society. The jury, as a manifesto, decidedhumble dwelling house very low budget which recycled prefabricated materials belonginWe cannot end this little reflection without mentioning social projects, which will voluncity, as is the case of Matache Urban Regeneration Plan.Finally we congratulate the organization and the Commissioner of the Biennale for the eevent of such importance.

Dr.arh. Rosa Cervera, Dr.arh. Javier PiozProfesori la Universitatea Politehnic, Madrid, Spania

Calitatea mea de membru al juriului n cadrul Bienalei Naionale de Arhitectur a nsemnat un bun prilej de a facecunotin cu breasla arhitecilor din Romnia din ziua de azi.Comitetul de organizare a Bienalei a decis ca juriul s viziteze toate acele cldiri care au ajuns n etapa finalde examinare i care au ntrunit cerinele. Aceast abordare privind modul de selecie a ctigtorilor, care nu se ncadreaz n mod obinuit n tipologia competiiilor n arhitectur bienale sau de alt natur, din punct de vedereal timpului i efortului alocat, ne-a condus ntr-o uluitoare cltorie ce s-ar putea numi o aventur n domeniularhitectural i care ne-a facilitat cunoaterea arhitecturii n cel mai bun mod, adic prin vizitarea construciilor i

examinarea lor la faa locului, aprecierea amplasrii, spaialitii, detaliilor lor, care adesea nu pot fi observate ntr-o fotografie.Ni s-a oferit ocazia de a vizita peste 20 de cldiri aflate n Bucureti, Braov, Cluj-Napoca i n cteva zone ruralede o rar frumusee, adesea greu de gsit n alt parte. Ne-am cufundat n privelitile cu valoare cultural, n ciudafaptului c principala cale de a cunoate arta i arhitectura se limiteaz deseori la imaginile pe care mass-media nile prezint. A fost extrem de instructiv s experimentm n mod direct frumuseea cldirilor, s ne bucurm de ele,s le admirm pe viu i s nu ne lsm captivai de fotografii plcute la vedere, dar adesea amgitoare.Am avut prilejul de a simi strlucirea i calitatea arhitecturii lucrrilor publice i de creaie. Toate lucrrile, pornindde la cele realizate la scar mare, precum stadioane i cldiri de birouri, pn la cele la scar mic i antiere decreaie, sunt devotate excelenei, acest lucru reflectndu-se n implementarea lor pe un amplasament, n cutareaspaiului adecvat, stabilirea unui anumit program, schiele i preocuparea sporit pentru detaliile construciei.Situaia a fost puin diferit n ceea ce privete categoria locuinelor. La aceast Bienal, au fost prezentate doarcteva cldiri de apartamente, iar casele individuale supuse analizei au fost de asemenea mici i puine. Numrulpersoanelor fr locuine, susinerea sczut a sectorului imobiliar i chiar susinerea public pot fi un indicator alunei insuficiente activiti economice i de construcie n aceast ar. Nu putem dect s ne exprimm regretul f ade aceast lips care are legtur i cu cei ce rmn orfani din cauza lipsei construciilor n Romnia. Pe de altparte i n mod paradoxal, exemplele de case individuale prezentate n cadrul acestui eveniment aveau tendina

spre extravagan i exces, n contrast cu absena real a locuinelor pentru majoritatea populaiei. Suprafeeleanalizate i cantitatea unor excese cu rdcini n trecut, ncorporarea obiectelor i schiele arhitecturale ne arat oalt realitate la nivel naional, i anume cea legat de locuinele alese de persoane aparinnd anumitor straturiale societii. Ca un manifest, juriul a hotrt s premieze o locuin modest, n care, cu un buget redus, s-aureciclat prefabricate aparinnd unui trecut comun tuturor romnilor.Nu putem ncheia aceast expunere fr s menionm proiectele sociale care vor ajuta la reabilitarea oraului,cum ar fi, de exemplu, Planul pentru Regenerare Urban a zonei Matache Bucureti. n ncheiere, felicitm Comisarul Bienalei i echipa organizatoric pentru eforturile deosebite depuse n cadrulunui eveniment de asemenea importan.


12/347

23

Ph.D. Arch. Key Imaguire Junior Ph.D. Arch. MariProfessor at University of Curitiba, Brasil

Countries, as well as their people, become known all over the world by a triad. For Italy, wSophia Loren. For Brazil it is beach, carnival and soccer. And for Romania of courComneci and Ceauescu. To sum it up: Italy is sensuality, Brazil is irresponsibility andWe dont believe in stereotypes, and we had an enormous curiosity about the region gEuropean East and about this country with a shape so similar to our state of Paran.

Our participation in the BNAB was a great opportunity to quench, in a conclusive way, torganized event gave us the opportunity to be in contact with one of the greatest artistcivilization: its architecture.We learned about the extraordinary spatial historic formulations: bisericas, monasteries, in the Romanian territory. We also learned about the existence of many wonderful cities one of the most charming European capitals, but also the fascinating Timisoara, Cluj-Naand this jewel among cities, Sibiu.We also learned that Romanians are proud of this heritage, which is being restored, valoability and professionalism. From the Dacians to modernity, a great heritage is being studAnd architectural modernity in Romania shows demonstrates that this rich heritage ismaintained. We saw surprising use of iron and metal; respectful use of wood, and compeand natural resources. This is a widespread attitude among established professionals and to work in the field at Ion Mincu University.This contact with professionals, sponsored by the BNAB, has revealed an enormous varidoing good architecture.Back to typecasting: we must understand stereotypes in their symbolic contours.

Walter Benjamin says that every document of culture is also a document of barbarismdictator, but the world is full of cruel dictators that did not leave behind grand emblemcountries. Nadia Comaneci worked and trained hard for years to stun the world with her pAnd Vlad Dracul, well, beyond the legends of cruelty, remains a king that saved Europe We hope you Romanians will excuse us for touching upon these sensitive points for youroffended when somebody talks about Romania using the triad as much as when our couOh, I know everything about you Brazilians! Pele, Copacabana, carnivalWhen somebody does this, we remember the monasteries and cities in the Carpathian Mthe cordiality and good manners of the Romanian people. We remember all the intense cWe remember the excellent architecture that has been produced and is being done nowTo sum it up: we feel like RomaniansThank you for all this BNAB Romania!

Dr.arh.Key Imaguire Junior Dr.arh. Marialba ImaguireProfesor la Universitatea din Curitiba, Brazilia

rile, ca i oamenii lor, devin cunoscui peste tot n lume, printr-o triad. Pentru Italia, avem pizza, operai pe Sophia Loren. Pentru Brazilia exist plaja, carnavalul i fotbalul. Iar pentru Romnia exist, desigur,Dracula, Nadia Comneci i Ceauescu. Pentru a rezuma: Italia este senzualitate, Brazilia este iresponsabilitatei Romnia este un loc ciudat. Noi nu credem n stereotipuri i am avut o curiozitate enorm relativ la r egiune, ngeneral cunoscut drept Europa de Est i despre aceast ar cu o form att de asemntoare cu statul nostruParan.Participarea noastr la B.N.A.B. a fost o mare oportunitate de a potoli, ntr-un mod concludent, aceast curiozitate.Aceste eveniment perfect organizat ne-a oferit oportunitatea s venim n contact cu una dintre cele mai mariexpresii artistice pentru fiecare civilizaie: arhitectura sa.Am aflat despre extraordinarele formulri istorice spaiale: biserici, mnstiri, castele i fortificaii de pe teritoriulRomniei. Am nvat de asemenea despre existena multor orae minunate nu doar Bucureti, una dintrecele mai fermectoare capitale europene, dar i despre fascinantele Timioara, Cluj-Napoca, Braov, Alba Iulia iaceast bijuterie ntre orae, numit Sibiu. Am aflat de asemenea, c romnii sunt mndri de acest patrimoniu,care este restaurat, valorizat i gestionat cu abilitate i profesionalism. De la daci la modernitate este studiat irestaurat un mare patrimoniu.i modernitatea arhitectural n Romnia demonstreaz faptul c acest bogat patrimoniu este bine neles ipstrat. Am vzut utilizarea surprinztoare a fierului i metalului; utilizarea respectuoas a lemnului icompetena n uzul energiei i resurselor naturale. Aceasta este o atitudine larg rspndit printre profesionitii istudenii pregtii s lucreze n domeniu, la Universitatea Ion Mincu.Acest contact cu profesionitii, sponsorizat de ctre B.N.A.B., a dezvluit o varietate enorm de modaliti degndire i de a face arhitectur bine. napoi la typecasting: trebuie s nelegem stereotipurile n contururile simbolice ale acestora.Walter Benjamin spune c fiecare document de cultur este de asemenea un document de barbarism. Ceauescua fost un dictator crud, dar lumea este plin de dictatori cruzi care nu au lsat n urma lor cldiri grandioaseemblematice pentru rile lor. Nadia Comneci a lucrat i s-a antrenat din greu ani de zile pentru a uimi lumeacu performana sa la Montreal. Iar Vlad Dracul, mai mult dect oricare dintre legendele de cruzime, rmne undomnitor care a salvat Europa de la o invazie a tu rcilor.Sperm ca, voi romnii, ne vei scuza pentru atingerea acestor puncte sensibile pentru ara dumneavoastr. Noi,brazilienii, ne simim ofensai atunci cnd cineva vorbete despre Romnia folosind triada, la fel de mult caatunci cnd ara noastr este identificat astfel: Oh, tiu totul despre br azilieni! Pele, Copacabana, carnavalAtunci cnd cineva face asta, ne amintim de mnstirile i oraele din munii Carpai. Ne amintim cordialitateai bunele maniere ale poporului romn. Ne amintim toat viaa cultural intens din Bucureti. Ne amintimarhitectura excelent ce a fost produs i este produs i n prezentPentru a rezuma: ne simim de parc am fi romni Mulumim pentru toate acestea B.N.A.B. Romnia!


13/347

25

Ph.D. Arch.Eleni G. GavraAssistant Professor at Western University of Macedonia, Greece

First and foremost, I would like to assert that participation in an event as the ARCHITECarchitect an honour and a unique experience.On the other hand, I think the 2012 BNAB which took place in Bucharest met all the stfrom the perspective of its organization and achievement.I think this result is firstly due to the organizations which were fully supported fromparticularly refer to the UAR and Ion Mincu University), and to their people/membersSeparately, I would like to mention their entire support from the beginning to the end ofI should state: the works quality, the scheme of the works assessment, the choice ofvenue for the evaluation commission (the history museum building situated in the commBucharest), the events along with the works exhibition and assessment and especially thour colleagues in Romania under the (material and moral) support of the BNAB CommisCristina Olga Gociman, Ph.D.Along with all the other things, I would like to express my satisfaction and my personahope our collaboration will go on in the future.

Dr.arh. Eleni G. GavraLector la Universitatea de Vest a Macedoniei, Grecia

Pentru nceput, a vrea s confirm c pentru fiecare arhitect, participarea la un eveniment ca BIENALA ARHITECTURIIeste o onoare i, n acelai timp, o experien unic.Pe de alt parte, cred c BNAB 2012 a avut toate atuurile succesului, la nivelul organizrii i realizrii.Cred c acest succes se datoreaz n primul rnd organizaiilor care, de la bun nceput pn n ultimul moment,i-au oferit tot s prijinul (m refer, mai ales, la U.A.R. i la Universitatea Ion Mincu), dar i oamenilor, membriloracestora.De asemenea, trebuie s menionez calitatea lucrrilor, schema organizrii evalurii lor, alegerea amplasamentuluide expoziie i de lucru al comisiei de evaluare, cldirea Muzeului Naional de Istorie a Romniei, situat ncentrul istoric comercial al Bucuretiului, evenimentele paralele cu expoziia i, mai ales, ospitalitatea oamenilor, acolegilor din Romnia, sub coordonarea i sprijinul material i moral al comisarului BNAB, profesor doctor arhitectCristina Olga Gociman.Pe lng toate acestea, a vrea s transmit tuturor satisfacia i mulumirile mele, s-mi exprim dorina de acontinua colaborarea dintre noi.


14/347

27

Arch. Victor MoraruVisiting Professor at the Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism RestoRomania

I was honored to be part of the jury of the 2012 BNAB architecture biennale for the firstWith projects selected during three previous biennales, I noticed how in each of its edfellowship is better and better organized, having international juries, specific regulationsalso involving other professional architecture organizations, creation unions, the mass mI can state that the tenth anniversary edition of the 2012 BNAB took place successfully dorganization coordinated by a vivacious commissioner and due to the conception of an aany events associated to the contest exhibition of projects.I would particularly like to outline that by means of provisions of the biennale regulationgiven the opportunity to get involved easily, democratically in the contest development aThus, the regulation was analyzed online by all the members of the jury who made obsubsequently accepted after their analysis undertaken by a curators team.The judgments were made individually by each jury member, online, according to a specwhich allowed the visualization of posters and all the pictures/plans/drawings under sepawere registered in a nominal table accessed only by means of a personal password.Along with other colleagues, members in the juries of other sections, I participated in a following route: Bucharest Horezu Sibiu Timisoara Alba Iulia Cluj Napoca C Braov Bucharest, to pay visits to the locations of the potential nominated projects inThe jury members were invited to the conference with the title Quality in Architectureabout the quality of works they designed. For the conference, I chose the theme: Public,urban stairs, parking plots in the historic centre of Sibiu.Another opportunity provided to the jury members was the organization of their own peorganizers chose from the suggested titles In the backstage of urban rebuilding in the hHermannstadt.And another provision in the Biennale regulation that I benefited from as a jury member projects in contest sections different from the one whose jury I was a member of, namelPictures with my project called Charm of Sibius architectural heritage depicted in drawI felt good in all my participations in the 2012 BNAB, beside the organizers, jury membeclassmates.

Arh.Victor MoraruProfesor invitat Universitatea de Arhitectura si Urbanism Ion Mincu Secia Restaurare, Sibiu, Romania

Am fost onorat s fac parte pentru prima dat din juriul bienalei de arhitectur B.N.A.B. 2012.Avnd proiecte selectate n trei bienale anterioare, am observat cum, de la o ediie la alta, acest eveniment albreslei noastre a fost din ce n ce mai bine organizat, cu jurii internaionale, regulamente specifice cuprinznd noiseciuni, implicnd i alte organizaii profesionale de arhitectur, uniuni de creaie, mass media.Pot afirma c a 10-a ediie aniversar a B.N.A.B. 2012 s-a desfurat, timp de o lun de zile, cu mare succes,datorit bunei organizri coordonate de un energic comisar i conceperii unui program amplu, ce a cuprins, nafara expoziiei concurs de proiecte, o multitudine de evenimente asociate acesteia.A dori s subliniez, n mod deosebit, cum membrilor juriului li s-au creat, prin prevederile regulamentului dedesfurare a Bienalei, condiiile implicrii nemijlocite, democratice, n desfurarea concursului i a evenimentelorconexe.Astfel, regulamentul a fost supus on-line analizrii tuturor membrilor juriului care au fcut observaii acceptateulterior, n urma analizei echipei curatoriale. Jurizarea s-a fcut individual de ctre fiecare membru al juriului, on-line, pe un program foarte complet, specialconceput, care a permis vizualizarea panourilor i a tuturor fotografiilor/planurilor,desenelor, n fiiere separate;notele trecndu-se ntr-un tabel n ominal accesat numai cu parol personal.Am participat, alturi de ali colegi membri, n juriile altor seciuni, la o excursie-maraton pe traseul Bucureti Horezu Sibiu Timioara Alba Iulia Cluj Napoca Cmpia Turzii Sighioara Braov Bucureti,vizitnd amplasamentele proiectelor din concurs candidate la nominalizare.Membrii juriilor au fost invitai s participe la conferina Calitatea n arhitectur, cu scurte prezentri desprecalitatea lucrrilor pe care le-au proiectat. Am ales pentru conferin tema: Piee publice, ziduri de sprijin, scriurbane, parcri din centrul istoric Sibiu.O alt oportunitate oferit membrilor juriului a fost organizarea unei expoziii personale. Din oferta propus,organizatorii au ales Culisele renovrilor urbane n centrul istoric Sibiu/Hermannstadt.O ultim prevedere a regulamentului Bienalei, de care am beneficiat ca membru al juriului, a fost posibilitateaprezentrii n concurs cu lucrri la alt seciune dect cea pe care am jurizat-o, respectiv la seciunea Arhitecturaprin imagine cu proiectul Farmecul patrimoniului arhitectural sibian surprins in desene i acuarele.La toate participrile legate de B.N.A.B. 2012 m-am simit bine lng organizatori, membri ai juriului, prieteni,foti colegi de grup.


15/347

29

Ph.D. Marina TeodorescuAssociate Professor at Bucharest National University of Arts , Romania

The impressive scale of the 2012 Bucharest National Architecture Biennale was renderdiversity of contest sections, by the unique and genuine character of themes and by the quIt may be surprising at first sight to come across a visual communication section within ingenious, new, surprising, original architecture is presented t hrough image, then the arcan interesting, appealing section to the audience.The Bucharest National Architecture Biennale proved to be a cultural event that not only

people interested in architecture, but also addresses the entire society. Solutions for privarehabilitation projects and solutions for historic or modern public spaces, all refer to the organizers idea of including the sections called Architecture by Words and Architectuas an event of cultural dialogues.

Ph.D. Vlad EftenieAssistant Professor Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism, Bucharest, R

In my opinion, it was one of the best organized editions of the Architecture Biennale, bof how the internal communication took place and from the perspective of substance, architectural products in its various forms, as it was seen from the outside. In my capawas always in touch with the development of specific stages in order to properly managcommission colleagues. As an architect, I was opened a wide range of options from professional conferences and meetings. There was certainly an increase in the quality anpublics perception referring to the architectural phenomenon in which is absolutely extr

Dr. Marina TeodorescuConfereniar la Universitatea Naional de Arte Bucureti, Romnia

Amploarea impresionant a Bienalei Naionale de Arhitectur Bucureti 2012 s-a constituit prin multitudinea idiversitatea seciunilor de concurs, prin ineditul i originalitatea tematicilor i prin calitatea proiectelor prezentate.Poate la prima vedere este surprinztor s ntlnim o seciune de comunicare vizual n cadrul unui concursde arhitectur. Dac imaginea este cea care ne face cunoscut arhitectura ingenioas, inedit, surprinztoare,original, atunci imaginea pus n slujba arhitecturii a oferit publicului o seciune interesant i seductoare.Bienala Naional de Arhitectur Bucureti s-a dovedit a fi un eveniment cultural ce vizeaz nu doar arhitecii i

publicul interesat de arhitectur, ci ntreaga societate. De la soluiile oferite unor persoane private, pn la proiecteample i soluii de reabilitare a unor spaii publice istorice sau moderne, s oluiile i proiectele prezentate vizeazsocietatea n ansamblul su. Ideea organizatorului de a include seciunile Arhitectura prin cuvnt i Arhitecturaprin imagine poziioneaz B.N.A.B. ca eveniment al dialogului cultural.

Dr. arh. Vlad EftenieLector la Universitatea de Arhitectur i Urbanism Ion Mincu, Bucuresti, Romania

Din punctul meu de vedere a fost una dintre cele mai bine organizate ediii ale Bienalei de Arhitectur, n ceeace privete desfurarea comunicrii interne i consistena, diversitatea i calitatea produsului de arhitectur subdiversele sale forme, aa cum a fost el privit din exterior. Ca membru al juriului am fost permanent la curent cudesfurarea etapelor specifice pentru o bun gestionare a activitilor alturi de colegii din comisii. Ca arhitectmi-a fost deschis o palet vast de opiuni de la expoziii la conferine i ntlniri profesionale valoroase. S-arealizat cu siguran o cretere a calitii i acuitii percepiei publicului larg cu privire la fenomenul arhitecturaldin Romnia, ceea ce este, cu siguran, extrem de ludabil.


16/347

31

Ph.D. Arch. Nicolas Mircea LupuProfessor Honoris Causa at Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism, Bu

A Biennale is part of major cultural events as it can polarize local, national, internationalIts public goal generally and largely corresponding to the r eality is opening an artistiSecondly, many arguments related to rankings, trends, people or groups may arise.To some let us take the most innocent example it is about high-level elitist celebrsarcasm of an architect fellow from Geneva when the S.I.A (Socit des Ingnieurs eproposed that an Annual Architecture Award be granted: Let us grant one more medaterms, there are more than just a few who find themselves rewarded for their true merithad over the years. Still, let us not forget that a Biennale is part of life and f ortunately lifNow, let me go back to the truly important aspects.The ability to deeply drain a significant territorial area is primordial. Besides organguarantee of a jury being competent and upright may invite to certain participation. Thebut emulous role to understand and outline by the awards they grant what is essentbetween architecture and the society generating it.The winning works are not only interesting in themselves, but they also represent, eachissues to be investigated at general, yet urgent level.I think it can be s aid that the 2012 BNAB successfully passed this exam.At this moment, we are reaching what can be called the key point of an operation. Thesubmits its choices urbi et orbi. Although relatively anonymous until now, the works caonly if they are joined by enough ways of making them understood, appreciated and lovedcan be fundamental. But unfortunately, this ultimate s print does not always find one re

Knowing that the final buzz is f rom the perspective of efficiency, at least equal to the energy used previously, should the organizers start with t he end?Leaving my (arguably unfair) malice aside a great Biennale such as the BNAB is areplaced in the emotions of a nations architecture.

Dr.arh.Nicolas Mircea LupuProfesor Honoris Causa al Universitii de Arhitectur i Urbanism Ion Mincu, Bucureti, Romnia

O Bienal face parte dintre manifestrile culturale majore, putnd polariza interese locale, naionale,internaionale.Mobilul su anunat care corespunde, n general, n mare msur, realitii este deschiderea unui sectorartistic spre marele public. n subsidiar, pot avea loc confruntri de poziii, tendine, persoane, grupuri.Pentru unii s lum cazul cel mai nevinovat este vorba de o celebrare elitist la scar mare. Nu pot uitasarcasmul unui coleg arhitect genevez cnd S.I.A (Socit des Ingnieurs et des Architects suisses) a propus creareaunui Premiu anual de arhitectur: s ne mai dm o mic medalie ntre noi. n realitate este mai mult de undram de adevr sub aparena cinismului dezabuzat. O amabil ceremonie unde unii i alii se gsesc recompensaipentru merite reale sau poziii ocupate n timp. Dar s nu uitm c o Bienal face parte din via, iar viaa nu este,din fericire, monocrom.S revenim la aspectele cu adevrat importante.Capacitatea de a drena n profunzime o arie teritorial reprezentativ este primordial. n afara eforturilororganizatorice, garania competenei i probitii juriilor poate incita la o anumit participare. Este, de asemenea,rolul dificil, dar stimulant, al juriului de a nelege i pune n eviden prin premiile pe care le acord ceea ceeste esenial n raporturile arhitecturii cu s ocietatea care o genereaz.Lucrrile premiate nu sunt numai interesante n sine, ele se nscriu, fiecare n domeniul su specific, ca teme deaprofundat pe plan general, adesea urgent.Se poate spune c B.N.A.B. 2012 a trecut cu bine acest examen.Ajungem, n acest moment, la ceea ce putem numi punctul cheie al operaiei.

Responsabil, breasla prezint urbi et orbi alegerile sale. Scoase dintr-un relativ anonimat, operele pot s-iafirme ntreaga valoare numai nconjurate de suficiente modaliti de a le face nelese, apreciate, iubite. Unmarketing (just, echitabil) este fundamental.Din pcate, acest sprint final nu ne gsete totdeauna suficient pregtii!tiind c buzzul ultim este cel puin egal, n termeni de eficacitate, enormei munci i energii desfurate nprealabil, poate c organizatorii ar trebui s nceap cu partea final?Lsnd maliiozitatea (fr ndoial, nedreapt) deoparte, o mare Bienal este cazul BNAB este un evenimentde nenlocuit n rezonana arhitecturii unei naiuni.


17/347

33

Ph.D. Arch. Anca Sandu TomaevschiProfessor at Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Architecture, Bucharest, Romania

The Biennale, an event in itself, has been another important moment in the lives of arcbelieve it heads towards the ideal of being an event in the world of Bucharests culturalchosen was a very good idea: it was on Calea Victoriei, close to pavements, easily acdoors. I wish it had been even more present on the outside by an arrangement on the stameant to draw the attention of passers-by. The exhibitions were beautiful, yet only retrowere counterbalanced by the exhibition of projects submitted in the contest most of wh

contemporary direction of creativity.Such contest participations were generally honorable. I was particularly surprised by thworks numerous, belonging to various genres and having high quality. Maybe those wcome together at times of crisis and wait for better times are right.

PhD. Arch. Teodor Octavian GheorghiuProfessor at Technical University Timioara, Romania, Faculty of Architecture

Being relatively in touch with the magnitude and content of Bucharest architecture biennaseemed one of the richest and most diverse. I refer to the topics assumed by the designs published. In this respect, I have a twofold comment to make:-The number, diversity and quality of projects submitted at the Biennale are a great surpas long as it is known Romania has been going through a long crisis and its signs are econstruction field. I understand this fact as the outcome of less h asty approaches. There

for and, implicitly, less interest in quality.- The number and diversity of themes, and the quality of products issued are an instancarchitects released from some of their daily tasks feeling the need for theoretical stuoutcomes should be presumably visible after a certain period of time. From this point ofmeant to recover historical events in the Romanian and foreign architectures, theoretical(especially city planning activism), of approaching arts and archaeology. I do not think tinto or associated to urbanism or architecture that might have been missing.The foregoing makes me a little more optimistic than I usually am when I think of ones architecture and urban planning. Generally speaking, the results acquired theoretically add as some more quality to the practical ones which are already visible. Last but not lecommissioner, work groups, institutions) deserve everyones admiration.

Dr.Arh. Anca Sandu TomaevschiProfesor la Facultatea de Arhitectur, Universitatea Spiru Haret, Bucureti

Bienala, ca manifestare, a fost din nou un eveniment n viaa noastr, a arhitecilor. A vrea s cred c se ndreaptctre idealul de fi un eveniment i n lumea elitei culturale bucuretene. Alegerea locului de desfurare a fosto idee bun: pe Calea Victoriei, aproape de trotuar, cu acces direct prin cteva ui. Mi-ar fi plcut s fie maiprezent i la exterior, printr-o amenajare pe treptele Palatului Potelor, care s atrag trectori. Expoziiile aufost frumoase, dar numai retrospective. Ele au fost ns compensate de expoziia de proiecte participante la concurs,cele mai multe angajate n direcia contemporan a creativitii.

Aceste participri la concurs au fost, n medie, onorabile. n mod special m-a surprins prezena publicaiilor numeroase, din genuri diverse i de foarte bun calitate. Poate c au dreptate cei care sper c n timpul crizei seadun energii care ateapt timpurile mai bune.

Dr. arh. Teodor Octavian GheorghiuProfesor la Universitatea Tehnic Timioara, Romnia, Facultatea de Arhitectur

Fiind relativ la curent cu amploarea i coninutul bienalelor de arhitectur bucuretene, cea de anul acesta mi s-aparut una dintre cele mai bogate i de o remarcabil diversitate. M refer la subiectele asumate prin proiectare i,mai ales, la cele publicate. Referitor la toate acestea, am un dublu comentariu:- Numrul, diversitatea i calitatea proiectelor construite prezentate la Bienal sunt o mare surprizi ndeamn la reflecie, tiut fiind faptul c Romnia parcurge o perioad de criz ndelungat, semnele crizeifiind ndeosebi vizibile n domeniul construciilor. Eu interpretez acest f apt ca rezultat al unor abordri mai puingrbite. Probabil, a fost mai mult timp s i, implicit, mai mare interes pentru calitate.

- Numrul, diversitatea temelor i calitatea produselor publicate reprezint un caz de normalitate,arhitecii eliberai de unele dintre sarcinile cotidiene simind nevoia unor studii teoretice sau cercetri proprii.Ar fi de presupus ca rezultatele lor s fie vizibile peste un timp oarecare. Din acest punct de vedere, remarc temelede recuperare a unor episoade de istorie a arhitecturii romneti sau strine, temele teoretice, temele de mareactualitate (activism mai ales urbanistic), apropierea de arte i arheologie. Nu cred c exist domeniu inclus sauasociat urbanisticii i arhitecturii care s fi fost absent.Cele spuse mai sus m fac s fiu ceva mai optimist dect sunt de obicei cnd m gndesc la resursele noastre pentruo arhitectur i un urbanism de calitate. n mod normal, rezultatele obtinute teoretic n aceti ani ar trebui s seadauge, ca un plus de calitate, celor practice, vizibile deja.Nu n ultimul rnd, organizatorii (comisar, grupuri de lucru, instituii) merit un cuvnt de admiraie.


18/347

35

Vlad Eftenie 2012


19/347

37

Report of the 2012 B.N.A.B. Commissioner

1. GENERAL INFORMATIONThe 2012 BUCHAREST NATIONAL ARCHITECTURE BIENNALE (BNAB) is the mthe architects fellowship which has been ceaselessly organized since 1994.On the 26th of February 2011, during the period between the previous 2010 BAB Biennthe architects fellowship celebrated 120 years since the foundation of the Romanian Sothe 15th of October 2012 it will celebrate 120 years since the beginning of architecture National School of Architecture. In addition, celebrating 160 years since Ion Mincus bideath, his name being the name of th e Bucharest University of Architecture and Urbanismthe year 2012 even more.In this respect, the Senate upon the Commissioners proposal approved the theme of theYears of Architectural Professional Organization and Higher Education.The Biennale focused on the heritage values of architectural spaces and on the chances tarchitecture, urbanism, restoration, indoor architecture, product architecture. Being awbuilt spaces is directly influenced by the interaction among authorities, architects and bewanted to create an interactive platform for the communication among such players.This Biennale aimed at inviting direct partners, namely all the professional organizateducation institutions in the fields of architecture, urbanism, restoration, indoor architeclandscape in Romania.Defining a highly performing built environment meant to meet the needs of direct becommunity required the presence of public institutions involvement, local and central regulation and coordination bodies engagement in specialty activities.

A work of architecture, urban design, restoration, indoor architecture, product architectuinto something real without the contribution of specialists such as: design engineers of stconstruction engineers, economists, material and service suppliers which make them parThe BNAB 2012 has been a complex program made up of 8 exhibitions, 3 professionseminars, and many events that took place during 2 years since its opening the eveBucharest, in county centers and foreign cultural offices meant in this context to celebratprofessional organization and higher education in Romania.

Raportul Comisarului B.N.A.B. 2012

1. GENERALITIBIENALA NAIONAL DE ARHITECTUR BUCURETI 2012 (B.N.A.B.) a fost i este cel mai important evenimentprofesional al breslei arhitecilor organizat nentrerupt din 1994. n intervalul dintre precedenta Bienal BAB 2010 i B.N.A.B. 2012, breasla arhitecilor a srbtorit 120 de ani dela nfiinarea Societii Arhitecilor Romni pe 26 februarie 2011 i 120 de ani de la nfiinarea nvmntuluisuperior de arhitectur prin coala Naional de Arhitectur pe 15 octombrie 2012. Totodat, anul 2012 a fostproclamat Anul Mincu, avnd n vedere aniversarea n acest an a 160 de ani de la naterea i 100 de ani de

la moartea lui Ion Mincu, cel al crui nume l poart cu mndrie Universitatea de Arhitectur i Urbanism dinBucureti.Lund n consideraie toate aceste evenimente care au marcat anul 2012, la propunerea comisarului, Senatul aaprobat ca tem a Bienalei 120 de ani de organizare profesional i de nvmnt superior de arhitectur.Bienala s-a concentrat pe valorile patrimoniale ale spaiului arhitectural i pe posibilitile de ameliorare acalitii vieii prin arhitectur, urbanism, restaurare, arhitectur de interior, design de produs. Contieni de faptulc evoluia spaiului construit este direct influenat de interaciunea dintre autoriti, proiectani i beneficiari,organizatorii au dorit crearea unei platforme interactive de comunicare ntre aceti actori.Aceast Bienal i-a propus ca toate organizaiile profesionale, toate instituiile de nvmnt superior de profilde arhitectur, urbanism, restaurare, arhitectur de interior, design de produs, peisagistica din Romnia sparticipe ca parteneri direci.Edificarea unui mediu construit performant care s satisfac i nevoile beneficiarului direct i pe cele alecomunitii nu poate exista fr implicarea instituiilor statului, a administraiei centrale i locale, a organismelorde reglementare i de coordonare a activitii de profil.O oper de arhitectur, de design urban, restaurare, arhitectur de interior, design de produs, peisagistica nu poate

deveni realitate fr aportul altor specialiti: ingineri proiectani de structur, de instalaii, ingineri constructori,economiti, furnizori de materiale i servicii, ceea ce i-a transformat n parteneri.B.N.A.B. 2012 a fost un program cultural complex reunind 8 expoziii, 3 conferine profesionale, 8 seminariitematice i evenimente ce s-au desfurat pe durata a 2 ani de la lansare, evenimente organizate n Bucureti,centre judeene i reprezentane culturale externe menite, n contextul menionat, s celebreze aniversarea a 120de ani de organizare profesional i de nvmnt superior de arhitectur n Romnia.


20/347

39

Locations of the Biennale: The Romanian National History Museum in Bucharest, Calea Victoriei no. 12 Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism, Bucharest, Academiei str Ion Mincu House, Pictor Verona street no. 19 Architectural Culture Centre, Calea Jean Louis Calderon no. 48 The National Bank of Romania, Lipscani street, no.25The main event of the Biennale was: the Project Contest Exhibition in its tenth edition.

2. The 2012 BNAB PROJECT CONTEST EXHIBITIONwas organized at the Romanian Museum of NatioHistory (MNIR), Calea Victoriei no. 12, and composed of the following sections: Dwelling Architecture (a dwellings design is one of the fundamental designs i

its compliance, endowment or adequacy influences a familys balance and, implbalance).

Architecture of Community and Production Endowments designs promoting thof a community (offices, administration, services, trade, culture, education, healplaces of worship, production areas) significantly contributing by their compliaadequacy in organizing a built habitat.

Technology, Innovation and Sustainability in Architecture designs that apply innrelated to the reduction of energy and raw material consumption, the decrease ofupon the climate by the use of environment-friendly technologies, the limitationresource consumption, energy preservation (passive house) and the productionenergy.

Cultural Heritage Architecture (designs for the preservation, rehabilitation, conveof the already existing built heritage).

Indoor Space Architecture, Product Design and Scenography designs that promquality objects and meaningful performance areas.

Architecture of Public Areas - urban building designs, permanent or temporary imareas, landscape painting, contributions adding cultural components to the public

Spatial Planning, sustainable urban, improvement strategies and operations in tera change in perceptions when approaching growth by means of surveys and projeinformation to urban players and succeed in tr uly catalyzing the amount of qualit

Architecture by Pictures, photography, drawings, graphics, graphic designs, finetelevision or other visual communication methods.

Architecture by Words, publications, journalism, reports, written studies and sce

Locurile de desfurare a Bienalei: Muzeul Naional de Istorie a Romniei Bucureti, Calea Victoriei nr.12 Universitatea de Arhitectur i Urbanism Ion Mincu Bucureti, str. Academiei nr.18-20 Casa Ion Mincu, str. Pictor Verona nr.19 Centrul de Cultur Arhitectural, Str. Jean Louis Calderon nr. 48 Banca Naional a Romniei, str. Lipscani nr. 25Bienala a avut ca eveniment central Expoziia Concurs de proiecte, concurs aflat la a X-a ediie.

2. EXPOZIIA CONCURS DE PROIECTE B.N.A.B. 2012 a avut loc la Muzeul Naional de Istorie a Romniei(MNIR) Calea Victoriei nr.12, fiind compus din urmtoarele seciuni: Arhitectura locuinei: proiectul locuinei este unul din proiectele fundamentale ale societii care prin

conformare, echipare, adecvare, influeneaz echilibrul familiei i, implicit, echilibrul colectivitii. Arhitectura dotrilor comunitare i de producie: proiecte care promoveaz dotrile specifice ale

comunitii (birouri, administraie, servicii, comer, cultur, nvmnt, sntate, sport, agrement,spaii de cult, spaii de producie), aducnd prin conformarea, echiparea i adecvarea lor contribuiisemnificative la organizarea habitatului construit.

Tehnologie, inovaie i sustenabilitate n arhitectur, proiecte care aplic tehnologii inovatoare privindreducerea consumului de energie i materii pr ime, reducerea influenelor negative asupra climei prinutilizarea de tehnologii nepoluante, limitarea consumului resurselor neregenerabile, conservareaenergiei (casa pasiv) i producerea de energie nepoluant.

Arhitectura patrimoniului cultural, proiecte de conservare, reabilitare, conversie i restaurare apatrimoniului construit existent.

Arhitectura spaiului interior, design de produs i scenografie: proiecte care promoveaz spaiulinterior i obiectele purttoare de calitate i un s paiu sugestiv al spectacolului.

Arhitectura spaiului public: proiecte de design urban, amenajri permanente sau temporare alespaiilor publice, peisagistic - contribuii care adaug infrastructurii publice componente culturale.

Planificare spaial, strategii, operaiuni urbane i de amenajare a teritoriului sustenabile, care propunschimbarea percepiei asupra modului de abordare a dezvoltrii prin studii i proiecte cu mare puterede comunicare ctre actorii urbani i care reuesc s catalizeze real generarea de spaii construite decalitate.

Arhitectura prin imagine: fotografie, desen, grafic, graphic design, arte plastice, arte decorative film,tv sau alte modaliti vizuale de comunicare.

Arhitectura prin cuvnt: publicaii, publicistic, reportaje, studii scrise i scenarii - care contribuie la


21/347

41

in promoting the values of architecture, built, interior and public spaces. Completed and Unaccomplished Surveys and Designs, studies and designs left on

whose creative concepts can contribute in developing the architectural spaces of endowments, production endowments, of cultural heritage, of public areas, of lanew concepts, applying high-level technologies able to change the field specific a

The project contest developed according to the regulation approved by the Senate.

Participants and Jury of the ExhibitionAll graduates of specialty higher education institutions in the fields of architecture, cuplanning, landscape painting, indoor architecture, product design, art history and criticisabroad were allowed to participate, holding degrees or certificates recognized by the Rospecialty professional organizations.They registered online during 1-30 June and 358 projects were submitted.The jury was made up per sections of three up to seven famous people of whom one wthe other members. The jury also includes nominated authors and prize winners from pbiennales and other famous contests in Romania and abroad as well as specialty professifrom abroad, representatives of professional organizations proposed by the curators teaUAR Senate.Members of the Jury: Dwelling Architecture Architecture of Community and Production Endowments Technology, Innovation and Sustainability in Architecture Completed and Unaccomplished Surveys and Designs - James Horan (Dublin, Ireland) - Rosa Cervera (Madrid,Spain) - Javier Pioz (Madrid,Spain) - Viorel Simion (Paris, France) - Viorel Hurduc (Bucharest, Romania) - Iulia Stanciu (Bucharest, Romania) - Tiberiu Buca (Cluj, Romania) Cultural Heritage Architecture

- Eleni G. Gavra (Greece) - Constana Carp (Bucharest, Romania) - Clin Hoinrescu (Ploieti, Romania)

promovarea valorilor arhitecturii, a patrimoniului cultural construit, a spaiului interior si public. Studii i proiecte finalizate i nerealizate, studii i proiecte de sertar, proiecte de idei ale cror conceptecreative pot contribui la dezvoltarea spaiului arhitectural al locuinei, a dotrilor comunitare i de producie, aspaiului patrimoniului cultural, a spaiului public, a peisajului, i care propun concepte inedite, aplicarea unortehnologii de vrf apte s modifice abordarea specific a domeniului.Concursul de proiecte s-a desfurat conform regulamentului aprobat de Senat.

Participare i jurizare expoziieLa concurs au putut participa toi absolvenii instituiilor de nvmnt superior de specialitate din domeniularhitecturii, patrimoniului cultural, planificrii spaiale, peisagisticii, arhitecturii de interior, designului de produs,istoriei i criticii de art, din Romnia sau din strintate cu diplome i atestate recunoscute de statul romn i deorganizaiile profesionale de profil. nscrierea s-a fcut online n perioada 1-30 iunie i au fost nscrise 358 proiecte. Juriul a fost format pe seciuni, fiind alctuit din 3-7 membri, dintre care un preedinte de seciune ales de ceilalimembri. Membrii juriului au fost personaliti ale domeniului, autori nominalizai i premiai n cadrul ediiilorprecedente ale bienalelor i al altor concursuri de specialitate de renume din Romnia i strintate, precum iprofesioniti de renume din ar i strintate, reprezentani ai organizaiilor profesionale propui de echipacuratorial i aprobai de Senatul U.A.R. Ast fel, membrii juriului au fost, dup cum urmeaz: Arhitectura locuinei Arhitectura dotrilor comunitare i de producie Tehnologie, inovaie i sustenabilitate n arhitectur Studii i proiecte finalizate i nerealizate

- Rosa Cervera (Madrid,Spania)- Javier Pioz (Madrid, Spania)- James Horan (Dublin, Irlanda)- Viorel Simion (Paris, Frana)- Viorel Hurduc (Bucureti, Romnia)- Iulia Stanciu (Bucureti, Romnia)- Tiberiu Buca (Cluj, Romnia)

Arhitectura patrimoniului cultural- Eleni G. Gavra (Salonic,Grecia)- Constana Carp (Bucureti, Romnia)- Clin Hoinrescu (Romnia, Ploieti)


22/347

43

Indoor Space Architecture - Cristina Mnciulescu (Paris, France) - Gabriela Tabacu (Bucharest, Romania) - Cristian Corvin (Bucharest, Romania) - Andi Negoescu (Paris, France) alternate judge Architecture of Public Areas Spatial Planning - Constantin Spiridonidis (Salonic,Greece) - Key Imaguire Junior (Curitiba,Brazil) - Alexandru Sandu (Bucharest, Romania) - Tiberiu Florescu (Bucharest, Romania) - Victor Moraru (Sibiu, Romania)

- Marialba Imaguire (Curitiba, Brazil) alternate judge Architecture by Pictures - Marina Teodorescu (Bucharest, Romania) - Vlad Eftenie (Bucharest, Romania) - Hortensia Anton (Botescu) (Timioara, Romania) Architecture by Words - Mircea Lupu (Switzerland) - Teodor Octavian Gheorghiu (Timioara, Romania) - Vlad Gaivoronschi (Timioara, Romania) - Mihaela Criticos (Bucharest, Romania) - Anca Sandu Tomaevschi (Bucharest, Romania) Jury Awards per SectionsFirstly, the jury voted for the projects online. Then, each member of the jury voted and gThe grades were confidential; no jury member could see t he others grades, but th e finalThe projects assessed below 5 were not passed on to the next st age.Total number of projects accepted: 297 (Table of projects submitted/accepted per section

Arhitectura spaiului interior- Cristina Mnciulescu (Paris, Frana)- Gabriela Tabacu (Bucureti, Romnia)- Cristian Corvin (Bucureti, Romnia)- Andi Negoescu (Paris, Frana) membru supleant

Arhitectura spaiului public Planificare spaial

- Constantin Spiridonidis (Salonic, Grecia)- Key Imaguire Junior (Curitiba, Brazilia)- Alexandru Sandu (Bucureti, Romnia)- Tiberiu Florescu (Bucureti, Romnia)- Victor Moraru (Sibiu, Romnia)- Marialba Imaguire (Curitiba,Brazilia) membru supleant Arhitectura prin imagine- Marina Teodorescu (Bucureti, Romnia)- Vlad Eftenie (Bucureti, Romnia)- Hortensia Anton (Botescu) (Timioara, Romnia)

Arhitectura prin cuvnt- Mircea Lupu (Elveia)- Teodor Octavian Gheorghiu (Romnia, Timioara)- Vlad Gaivoronschi (Romnia, Timioara)- Mihaela Criticos (Romnia, Bucureti)- Anca Sandu Tomaevschi (Romnia, Bucureti)

Premiile juriului pe seciuni Juriul a fcut n prima etap o votare online a proiectelor.Fiecare membru al juriului a votat individual cu note de la 1 la 10. S-a asigurat confidenialitatea notrii,membrilor juriului fiindu-le vizibil doar media general.Proiectele cu media sub 5 nu au fost promovate n etapa a II-a.Total proiecte admise 297 (Tabel pe seciuni nscrise/admise)


23/347

45

SECTION PROJECTS SUBMITTED PROJECTS ACCEDwelling Architecture 62 47Architecture of Community and Production Endowments 42 37Technology, Innovation and Sustainability in Architecture 7 7Cultural Heritage Architecture 21 18Indoor Space Architecture 52 49Architecture of Public Areas 15 10Spatial Planning 20 13Architecture by Pictures 30 21Architecture by Words 32 32Completed and Unaccomplished Surveys and Designs 77 63TOTAL 358 297

During the second stage, when t he pre-nominated projects were viewed in their locationswas prepared. Among the project nominees, the jury chose the prize for each and every The UAR President Award and the BNAB Medal The UAR President granted the UAR President Award and the BNAB Medal to Award Granted by Partners/SponsorsThe partners and sponsors granted special awards to some projects they had selected acriterion of their fields of activity. Opera OMNIA MedalThe Opera OMNIA Medal was granted by the UAR Senate, upon the UAR Presidents pThe Opera Omnia medal is granted to architects, town planners, landscape painters, inddesigners, restoration architects, specialty survey authors, graduates of specialty highefrom Romania or from abroad, holders of professional degrees recognized by the Romspecialty organizations, who have reached a respectable age over 75, who by their perforcontributed in the development of built-in spaces in specific fields: architecture, urbanicultural heritage, indoor architecture, product design, publications and profile image.

3. FESTIVITIES Welcoming of the members of the jury the 10th of October by the president and the senate of UArchitectural Culture Centre, Calea Jean Louis Calderon no. 48Opening and awarding festivity the 15th of October 2012, 5 oclock p.m., at the Romanian Nati

SECIUNE PROIECTE NSCRISE PROIECTE ADMISEArhitectura locuinei 62 47Arhitectura dotrilor comunitare i de producie 42 37Tehnologie, inovaie i sustenabilitate n arhitectur 7 7Arhitectura patrimoniului cultural 21 18Arhitectura spaiului interior 52 49Arhitectura spaiului public 15 10Planificare spaial 20 13Arhitectura prin imagine 30 21Arhitectura prin cuvnt 32 32Studii i proiecte finalizate i nerealizate 77 63TOTAL 358 297

n etapa a doua, n urma vizionrii la amplasament a proiectelor prenominalizate s-a desemnat lista final anominalizrilor. Dintre lucrrile nominalizate, juriul a desemnat premiul pentru fiecare seciune n parte. Premiul Preedintelui U.A.R. i medalia B.N.A.B., acordate de preedinte pentru dou lucrri din

concurs. Premiul partenerilor / sponsorilor, premii speciale acordate de parteneri i sponsori unor lucrri

selecionate pe criteriul specific ariei lor de activitate. Medalia Opera OMNIA, acordat la propunerea Preedintelui U.A.R. de ctre Senatul U.A.R.

n criteriile de acordare a medaliei s e nscriu arhitecii, urbanitii, peisagitii, arhitecii de interior,designerii de produs, arhitecii, restauratorii, autorii de studii de specialitate, absolvenii de instituiide nvmnt de specialitate din Romnia sau strintate cu diplom, recunoscui de statul romni de organizaiile de profil, care au ajuns la o vrst respectabil de peste 75 de ani i care prinactivitatea lor au adus o contribuie remarcabil la dezvoltarea spaiului construit n domenii specifice:arhitectur, urbanism, peisagistic, patrimoniu cultural, arhitectur de interior, design de produs,publicaii i imagine de profil.

3. FESTIVITIFestivitatea de primire a membrilor juriului (10 octombrie 2012, Centrul de Cultur Arhitectural, Jean LouisCalderon nr.48) unde juriul a fost primit de ctre preedintele dr. arh. Viorica Curea i Senatul UAR.Festivitatea de deschidere i premiere (15 octombrie 2012, Muzeul Naional de Istorie a Romniei, CaleaVictoriei nr.12) a nregistrat un maxim de audien, cu peste 300 de participani.


24/347

47

Museum, Calea Victoriei nr.12 - enjoyed a large audience with more than 300 attendantsGala of Medals the 22nd of October 2012, 5 oclock p.m., the National Bank of Romania, - was an event organized on the occasion of granting the UAR President awards for thheritage work and to a contemporary architectural work, a future heritage object. Addititime to grant awards to those who contributed in achieving the architectural object buidesigners, architects and other specialists, structure and installation design engineers, en

4. ANNIVERSARY EVENTSThe main Anniversary exhibitions organized for the celebration of 120 years of archorganization and higher education aimed at highlighting the contribution of Romanian a

culture.

4.1. Memorabilis MedalOn the occasion of the opening festivity and the Gala of Medals, the Romanian Union oinstitutions and personalities that considerably helped in promoting the society of architeprofessional press institutions in Romania.In addition, the personalities who contributed by their works with words or pictures in theurbanism, landscape painting, cultural heritage, product design, indoor architecture andRomania were also awarded.For the first time the medals proposed by the organizer Memorabilis, Opera Omnia, in silver and bronze by the State Monetary with the support of the National Bank of Rogovernor Mugur Isrescu.

4.2. Anniversary Exhibitions 15 October 15 November 2012 Romanian Architects, Creators of Cultural Heritage Exhibition, 1869-1989 National History Museum of Romania, Calea Victoriei no. 12 Ion Mincu Retrospective Exhibition 1852-1912 National History Museum of Romania, Calea Victoriei no. 12 BAB Retrospective Exhibition 1994-2010 National History Museum of Romania, Calea Victoriei no. 12 Exposition of architecture inscriptions and medals

National History Museum of Romania, Calea Victoriei no. 12 Opera Omnia Exhibition

National History Museum of Romania, Calea Victoriei no. 12

Gala medaliilor (22 octombrie 2012, Banca Naional a Romniei, Str. Lipscani nr.25) a fost o manifestarespecial prilejuit de acordarea premiilor preedintelui U.A.R., pentru prima dat destinate unei opere depatrimoniu cultural i unei opere de arhitectur contemporan, viitor obiect de patrimoniu. Tot n premier, s-auacordat premii tuturor celor care au contribuit la realizarea obiectului de arhitectur, de la investitori i proiectani arhiteci, ingineri de structuri i instalaii la antreprenori.

4. EVENIMENTE ANIVERSAREPrincipalele expoziii aniversare prilejuite de celebrarea celor 120 de ani de existen profesional i de nvmntsuperior de arhitectur i-au propus evidenierea contribuiei arhitecilor romni la edificarea culturii naionale.

4.1. Medalia MemorabilisCu ocazia Festivitii de deschidere i a Galei Medaliilor, Uniunea Arhitecilor din Romnia a premiat cu MedaliaMemorabilis instituiile i personalitile care au contribuit considerabil la promovarea societii arhitecilor iinstituiilor de nvmnt superior i de pres profesional din Romnia, precum i personalitile care prin operalor au contribuit, prin cuvnt sau imagine, la promovarea arhitecturii, urbanismului, peisagisticii, patrimoniuluicultural, designului de produs, arhitecturii de interior publicaiilor de profil din Romnia.Pentru prima dat, Medaliile Memorabilis, Opera Omnia i BNAB propuse de organizator au fost btute n arginti bronz la Monetria Statului cu sprijinul Bncii Naionale a Romniei, n special al domnului guvernator acad.dr. Mugur Isrescu.

4.2. Expoziii aniversare 15 octombrie-15 noiembrie 2012 Expoziia Arhiteci romni creatori de patrimoniu cultural 1869-1989 (Muzeul Naional de Istorie a Romniei, Calea Victoriei nr.12, Bucureti) Expoziia retrospectiv Ion Mincu(1852-1912) (Muzeul Naional de Istorie a Romniei, Calea Victoriei nr.12, Bucureti)

Expoziia Retrospectiv B.A.B. (1994-2010) (Muzeul Naional de Istorie a Romniei, Calea Victoriei nr.12, Bucureti) Expoziia de nscrisuri i medalii de arhitectur aniversare

(Muzeul Naional de Istorie a Romniei, Calea Victoriei nr.12, Bucureti) Expoziia Opera Omnia (Muzeul Naional de Istorie a Romniei, Calea Victoriei nr.12, Bucureti)

5. MANIFESTRI PROFESIONALE SPECIALEB.N.A.B. ediia 2012 a continuat deschiderea iniiat de ediiile precedente i seria de colaborri cu specialitidin domenii conexe arhitecturii, urbanismului, patrimoniului cultural i amenajrii interioare. n acest sens,


25/347

49

5. SPECIAL PROFESSIONAL EVENTSThe 2012 edition of the BNAB made it possible to continue the openness arising duringthe series of partnerships with specialists in fields related to architecture, urbanism, cultudesign. In this respect, the architectural submissions and interactive exhibitions meant anelement between specialists and the civil society.

5.1. Associated Exhibitions: Schools and degree project works (architecture, urban planning, landscape, desig

National History Museum of Romania, Calea Victoriei no. 12 Exhibition of jury members works Exhibition Hall Ion Mincu University

Urbanism in Bucharest, str. Academiei no. 18-20 Inobuild exhibition of innovative materials and technologies in architecture aNational History Museum of Romania, Calea Victoriei no. 12

5.2. BNAB Conferences, UAR-UAUIM Partnership (Romanian union of architects - Architecture and Urbanism): Quality in Architecture Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbani

October 2012 moderator Ph.D. Arch. Prof. Cristina Olga Gociman Built-in Heritage and Landscape Ion Mincu University of Architecture and U

24 October 2012 moderator assistant professor PhD. arch. Tana Lascu Sustainable Architecture and Emerging Issues Poverty and Multihazard Ion

Architecture and Urbanism in Bucharest 26 October 2012 - moderator assistantSergiu Petrea

5.3. Theme Seminars, Bursa Construciilor Magazine Romanian union of architeBuilding Stock Exchange 15 October 15 November 2012 National History MuseumCalea Victoriei no. 12 Energy Efficiency of Buildings 18 October 2012 Highly Performing Closures 23 October 2012 Information Technology in Architecture 25 October 2012 Efficient Covers of Buildings 30 October 2012 Indoor Space Ergonomics 2 November 2012 Outdoor Designs Public Areas Gardens 6 November 2012 Protection, Fire Safety, Surveillance Systems 9 November 2012 Restoring and Renovating Solutions 14 November 2012

prezentrile de arhitectur i expoziiile interactive au constituit un element de comunicare eficient ntre specialitii societatea civil.

5.1. Expoziii asociate 15 octombrie-15 noiembrie 2012: Expoziia coli i proiecte de diplom de arhitectur, urbanism, peisagistic, arhitectur de interior,

design de produs promoia 2012 (Muzeul Naional de Istorie a Romniei, Calea Victoriei nr.12,Bucureti)

Expoziia membrilor juriului (Sala de expoziie, Universitatea de Arhitectur i Urbanism Ion Mincu,str. Academiei nr.18-20, Bucureti)

Inobuild, expoziie de materiale i tehnologii inovative n arhitectur i construcii (Muzeul Naional

de Istorie a Romniei, Calea Victoriei nr.12, Bucureti)

5.2. Conferine B.N.A.B. 2012 parteneriat U.A.R.-U.A.U.I.M. (Uniunea Arhitecilor din Romnia i Universitatea deArhitectur i Urbanism Ion Mincu): Calitatea n arhitectur, 16 octombrie 2012 (Universitatea de Arhitectur i Urbanism Ion Mincu,

Bucureti) moderator prof. dr. arh. Cristina Olga Gociman Patrimoniu construit i peisaj, 24 octombrie 2012 (Universitatea de Arhitectur i Urbanism Ion

Mincu, Bucureti) moderator lect. dr. arh. Tana Lascu Arhitectura durabil i problemele emergente srcia i multihazardul, 26 octombrie 2012

(Universitatea de Arhitectur i Urbanism Ion Mincu, Bucureti) moderator lect. dr. arh. SergiuPetrea

5.3. Seminarii tematice B.N.A.B. 2012Parteneriat ntre Uniunea Arhitecilor din Romnia i revista Bursa Construciilor, 15 octombrie-15 noiembrie2012 (Muzeul Naional de Istorie a Romniei, Calea Victoriei nr.12, Bucureti) Eficiena energetic a cldirilor, 18 octombrie 2012 nchideri performante, 23 octombrie 2012 Tehnologia informaiei pentru arhitectur, 25 octombrie 2012 Anveloparea eficient a cldirilor, 30 octombrie 2012 Ergonomia spaiului interior, 2 noiembrie 2012 Amenajri exterioare Spaii publice Grdini, 6 noiembrie 2012 Sisteme de protecie, siguran la foc, supraveghere, 9 noiembrie 2012 Soluii pentru restaurri i renovri, 14 noiembrie 2012


26/347


27/347

53

Biennale Venues

The National History Museum of Romania Bucharest, Calea Victori12, Manager, Ph.D. Ernest Oberlander Trnoveanu,It is the work of Architect Alexandru Svulescu for Palatul Potelor a was completed in 1900. It was presented in the first issue of ArhitecReview which made the organizers recommend it thanks to its monumqualities, to the generosity of interior spaces of more than 3000 m2 fexhibitions, to its location in the neighbourhood of the historic cen

and to the premises of Romanias Union of Architects and of Ion MUniversity of Architecture and Urbanism. The manager of the museMr. PhD. Ernest Oberlander Trnoveanu and the economic manager Cristina Moisescu organised an anniversary exposition with architecmedals and inscriptions.

Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism Bucharest, 18 Academiei Str. It is the masterpiece of Engineer Architect Grigore Cand Architect Iorgu Ciortan, commenced in 1912 and completed in 1It hosted the BNAB Conferences and the jury member works exhibi

The Architectural Culture Centre Bucharest, 48, Jean Louis CaldStr. It is the work of Architect Siegfried Kofczinsky, it was purchasethe UAR in 2002 in order to carry out is cultural performance. Here place the debates of the contest exhibition regulation, the presentatioof the accepted projects, the biennale events, welcome party for the jand release of BNAB 2012 documentary movie and the round table December 2012.

Ion Mincu House Bucharest, 19, Pictor Verona Str. It was inauguraafter a long, difficult restoration process coordinated by Architect eSturdza on the occasion of the Biennale and housed the first open even with guests during the La Mincu event 26 October 2012.

The Palace of The National Bank of Romania, Bucharest, Lipscani sno. 25. The first Palace of The National Bank of Romania was built ioldest commercial area of Bucharest, delimited in the second half of nineteenth century Lipscani streets (the oldest),Calea Victoriei (formMogooaia), Smrdan street and Doamnei street.

Locurile de desfurare ale Bienalei Muzeul Naional de Istorie al Romniei, Bucureti, Calea Victoriei nr. 12este opera arhitectului Alexandru Svulescu, funciunea iniial fiind aceeade Palat al Potelor. A fost inaugurat n 1900 i a aprut n primul numral Revistei Arhitectura.Calitile sale monumentale, generozitatea spaiului interior, suprafaaexpoziional de peste 3000 mp, precum i poziia sa n proximitateacentrului istoric, a sediilor Uniunii Arhitecilor din Romnia i a Universitiide Arhitectur i Urbanism Ion Mincu, sunt atuuri care i-au determinatpe organizatori s propun aceast cldire ca principal loc de desfurarea evenimentelor prilejuite de Bienal. Directorul Muzeului dr. ErnestOberlander Trnoveanu i doamna director economic Cristina Moisescu auorganizat o expoziie de nscrisuri i medalii de arhitectur aniversare.

Universitatea de Arhitectur i Urbanism Ion Mincu, Bucureti, Str. Academiei nr.18-20 este opera inginerului arhitect Grigore Cerchez i aarhitectului Iorgu Ciortan. Construcia a nceput n 1912 i s-a finalizat n1927. A gzduit Conferinele B.N.A.B. i expoziia Membrilor Juriului.Centrul de Cultur Arhitectural, Bucureti, Str. Jean Louis Calderon nr. 48,este opera arhitectului Siegfried Kofczinsky, achiziionat de U.A.R. n 2002pentru desfurarea activitilor culturale. Aici au avut loc dezbaterile petema regulamentului expoziiei concurs, prezentarea proiectelor admise, aevenimentelor bienalei, primirea membrilor juriului cat si lansarea filmuluidocumentar BNAB 2012 si masa rotunda de pe 14 decembrie 2012.

Casa Ion Mincu, Bucureti, Str. Pictor Verona nr. 19, cas de sfrit desecol XIX - nceput de secol XX, a aparinut arhitectului Antonio GaetanoBurelli i din 1890, lui Ion Mincu, care a locuit-o pn n 1912, aducndcteva modificri. n prezent, cldirea este proprietatea Ordinul Arhitecilordin Romania (O.A.R.), fiind restaurat de o echip coordonat de arhitectulerban Sturdza ntre 2004 i 2012. Casa a fost inaugurat cu ocazia Bienaleii a gzduit prima sear deschis cu invitai, denumit La Mincu pe 26octombrie 2012.

Palatul Bncii Naionale a Romniei, Bucureti, Str. Lipscani nr. 25Primul palat al Bncii Naionale a Romniei a fost ridicat n cea mai vechezon comercial a oraului Bucureti, delimitat n a doua jumtate asecolului al XIX-lea de strzile Lipscani (cea mai veche), Calea Victoriei(fost Mogooaia), Smrdan i Doamnei.


28/347

55

2 Istoricul organizrii profesionale a arhitecilor / Historical Background of the Profes

Organization of the Romanian Architects

Preedini ai Societii Arhitecilor romni / Preedini ai Uniunii Arhitecilor din RomPresidents of the Romanian Society of Architects / Presidents of the Union of Architects of

Istoricul nvmntului superior de arhitectur din Romnia - UAUIM / Historical Backof The Romanian Higher Education In Architecture - UAUIM

Conductori ai colii de Arhitectur din Bucureti de-a lungul timpului / Leaders of theof Architecture in Bucharest over the years

Lumea arhitecilor romni acum 100 de ani / The World of the Romanian ArchitectHundred Years Ago

Conductori ai revistei Arhitectura / Arhitectura Review of The Romanian UArchitects Founded In 1906

Ion Mincu la aniversare / Ion Mincu at the Anniversary (1852 -1912)

Arhiteci romni creatori de patrimoniu cultural / Romanian Architects, Creators Of Cultura

Retrospectiva BAB / BAB Retrospective

Expoziia de proiecte de diplom de arhitectur, urbanism, peisagistic, arhitectur de int

design de produs promoia 2012 / Exhibition of Diploma Projects Of Architecture, Urban PLandscape Planning, Restoration, Interior Architecture, Product Design

Diplome de excelen i Medalii Memorabilis acordate de Senatul Uniunii ArhiteciRomnia / Diplomas of Excellence, Memorabilis Medals And Bnab2012 Medals

Medalia Opera Omnia Acad. prof. dr. arh. Romeo Belea / Romeo Belea: Opera Omnia M

ANIVERSARANIVERS

55


29/347

57


30/347

59

Historical Background of the Professional Organization Architects

1864 Ruler Alexandru Ioan Cuza passed the High Approval of the Regulation regaof Architecture Services for Civil Buildings upon the suggestion of Mihail Kogin the Department of Domestic Affairs, Agriculture and Public Works.

1874 Establishing of the Regulation for the classification and preservation of oupresided by the Minister of Training and Cults.

1882 V. A. Ureche prep

Catalog BNAB 2012

Documents

Transcript of Catalog BNAB 2012