Çatal Huyuk the Prelude
Transcript of Çatal Huyuk the Prelude
-
CATAL HUYUK: A PRELUDE TO CIVILIZATION
A Thesis
Presented
to the Faculty o f
California State University Dominguez Hills
In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Degree
Master of Arts
in
Humanities
by
Pamela J. Vafi
Fall 2005
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
UMI Number: 1432972
Copyright 2005 by Vafi, Pamela J.
All rights reserved.
INFORMATION TO USERS
The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.
In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
UMIUMI Microform 1432972
Copyright 2006 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company.
All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against
unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code.
ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road
P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
Copyright by
PAMELA J. VAFI
2005
All Rights Reserved
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
THESIS: CATALHUYUK: A PRELUDE TO CIVILIZATION
AUTHOR: PAMELA VAFI
APPROVED:
Bryan Feuer, Ph.D. Thesis Committee Chair
Jahres S. Jeffers, PiVD Committee Member
Louise H. Ivers, Ph.D. Committee Member
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
COPYRIGHT PAGE..................... ii
APPROVAL PAGE.....................................................................................................................iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS............................................................................................................iv
LIST OF FIGURES.................................................................................................................... vi
ABSTRACT.............................................................................................................................. vii
CHAPTER
1. CATAL HUYUK: A PRELUDE TO CIVILIZATION........................................................ 1
Introduction....................................................................................................................... 1
2. MATERIAL, METHODOLOGY, AND THEORIES.........................................................7
Literature Review............................................................................................................. 7Methodology...................................................................................................................11Theories on the Development o f Civilization............................................................ 13
3 THE NEOLITHIC POPULATION AND ENVIRONMENT..........................................20
The Geography, Climate, and Ecology o f the Anatolian Plateau........................... 20Chronology of Neolithic Period................................................................................... 23
4. THE SUBSYSTEMS OF CATAL HUYUK....................................................................31
The Architectural Design o f atal Huyiik as a Monumental Public W ork........... 37Population Density in atal Hiiytik............................................................................ 46Population Diversity and Non-Kinship Residency................................................... 48A Scientific Revolution in Agriculture.......................................................................48Surplus and Storage.......................................................................................................51Labor Specialization......................................................................................................52Trade and Raw Materials..............................................................................................59Symbolism in Art, Burial Practices, and Abstract Concepts................................... 61Ranking and Social Stratification................................................................................70
iv
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
CHAPTER PAGE
5. A SYSTEMS-ECOLOGICAL AND SOCIAL PERSPECTIVE OF CATAL HUYUK.................................................................................................................................... 76
The Environment and Creativity.................................................................................. 78Positive-Feedback Relationships................................................................................. 80Negative-Feedback Relationships................................................................................97
6. A SUMMARY OF THE RESEARCH ON CATAL HUy UKS SUBSYSTEMS 99
WORKS CITED....................................................................................................................... I l l
APPENDIX: COPYRIGHT HOLDER PERMISSION STATEM ENT...........................118
v
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
LIST OF FIGURES
PAGE
1. Neolithic Sites Represented in Grey..................................................................................27
2. Neolithic Sites in Southern Anatolia and Sources o f Raw Materials............................32
3. Schematic Reconstruction o f a Section o f Level V I........................................................39
4. Diagrammatic View of Construction Technique at atal Huyiik.................................. 39
5. Building Plan - Level VI A ................................................................................................. 40
6. Building Plan - Level V IB ................................................................................................. 40
7. Restoration of Eastern and Southern Walls o f Shrine VI. 14......................................... 43
8. Decoration o f Northern and Eastern Walls o f Shrine VI A.8........................................ 43
9. Ceremonial Flint Dagger with Carved Bone Handle.......................................................53
10. Black Limestone and Lead Beaded Necklace...................................................................53
11. Examples o f atal Hiiyiik Pottery...................................................................................... 54
12. Spouted Dish of Red Sandstone from Shrine VIA.8.......................................................54
13. Characteristic Wooden Vessels from Levels VI A and V IB .........................................55
14. Clay Statuettes o f Female Forms, Possibly Goddesses.................................................. 55
15. Textile Found in Burial Site in Shrine VI. 1......................................................................57
16. Cloth Tapes Used for Ties and in Burial Practices..........................................................57
17. Baked Clay Seals Excavated from Level V IB to Level II.............................................68
18. Feedback Relationships Between Subsystems, the Environment, and the Group 81
vi
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
ABSTRACT
Neolithic atal Hiiyiik challenges prevailing theories that attribute the origins of
civilization to the third millennium B .C .E. To gain a comprehensive portrait o f this
prehistoric proto-city, I categorize the cultural inventory according to V. Gordon Childes
still relevant 1951 subsystem criteria. This study employs systems-ecological and social
models to analyze these subsystems and their interactions with the environment through
positive and negative feedback mechanisms. Based upon criteria including population
density, population founded on residence and not kinship, monumental public works,
technological knowledge, long-distance trade, and symbolic expression, I attempt to
demonstrate that atal Hiiyiik represents a proto-civilization. Although full-time labor
specialization and surplus product seem likely, research cannot definitively prove either,
and while this study demonstrates ranking, stratification seems improbable. Although
Catal Hiiyiik lacked the maturity o f Sumerian civilization, it contained the seeds of all
that the Mesopotamian civilizations were to become.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
1CHAPTER 1
QATAL HUYUK: A PRELUDE TO CIVILIZATION
Introduction
An enigmatic city lies on the Anatolian plateau o f central Turkey north o f the
Taurus Mountains and, though little known, holds potential to impact the interpretation of
history and our understanding o f the progress o f ancient man. Archeologist James
Mellaart estimated that this once-thriving community, where life transcended issues of
basic survival, had a minimum population o f five to six thousand (Wason 186; Heskel
362). Artisans painted elaborate murals, built fantastic shrines, engaged in civil
engineering projects, exploited resources both far and near, and undertook not only
practical and creative activities, but engaged in symbolic expression as well. But what
makes this urban center all the more intriguing is that it is not the contemporary o f a
thousand-year-old Mesoamerican city, nor even a more ancient Mesopotamian one, but is
instead a nine-thousand-year-old city that rivaled the complexities of those of a later age.
While scholars continue to posit the emergence of civilization in fourth millennium B C E
Sumeria, the hallmarks o f a proto-civilization were present in the city of atal Hiiyiik three
millennia before the ascendancy o f Uruk and other contemporaneous cities.
Neither village nor town, Qatal Hiiyiik was an exercise in urban complexity that
was the product o f a fertile ecological niche and the creativity o f an ancient people.
Although a primary characteristic of any urban center is a population in excess o f five
thousand, size alone does not differentiate the city from other community forms (Redman
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
2215). What defines the city as an urban center is not only size, but complexity and
integration. A citys population must be diverse; it must host nonagricultural activities and
provide assorted services for residents and those living in smaller communities in the
geographical vicinity. Likewise, urban centers must have some form of governing
organization to maintain the orderly coexistence of their dense populations (Redman 216).
Most early cities, however, began as villages that were a coalescence, organization,
and maturation o f scattered activities that were focused principally on nutrition,
reproduction, and simple religious ritual (Mumford 31). It was within the confines o f the
village that these activities were exploited and became the creative forces that stimulated
the diversification and growth o f these basic village components into the various divisions
that define a city. Defining civilization, however, proves more challenging and this study
in complexity remains the subject o f much controversy. In a broad sense, it is this
complexity that defines civilization as dynamic, as a process o f constant, interdependent
change o f its various components. A civilized society is productive, creative, and
possesses sufficient surplus to stimulate that creativity (Quigley 142).
The Latin root o f the word city is civitas or community and is closely associated
with civilization, citizen, and civilian, all o f which are a product of city life (City,
def. 415-416; Civitas, def. 1). Anthropologists, according to Fairservis, generally
adhere to the Latin meaning, characterizing civilization as either urbanization or a cultural
phenomenon of which cities are a symptom (4). The classical meaning o f civitas,
however, has nothing to do with the concept o f large and dense population centers. This
would be better defined as the Latin urbanus. Civitas, instead, can be defined as a society
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
3whereby mans true nature can emerge through the guidance o f family, a fair economic
market, friendship among craftsmen, and just governance (Civitas, def. 1). Civitas is
reminiscent o f the ideology o f the autonomous Greek polis where the grandeur o f the city
(excluding the Acropolis) was more a state o f mind than fact. A civilized society is more
than interactions between its various parts; it is first a social phenomenon that is about
relationships that bind a people together and create a unique milieu for institutional
growth. It was within this context that atal Hiiyiik has emerged as the worlds earliest
proto-urban environment.
That Catal Hiiyiik was a complex community is manifest in its archeological
remains. Archeological evidence indicates that it comprised a large and diverse population
with a shared ideology that engaged in long-distance trade and appeared to be a well-
nourished and stable society where order and organization prevailed. It was within atal
Hiiyiik that dispersed functions coalesced and were organized into a state o f dynamic
tension and interaction that produced a proto-urban setting that was to thrive for sixteen
hundred years. But determining whether atal Hiiyiik can be defined as a proto
civilization marked by social, political, and cultural complexity proves more daunting. It
is the goal o f this research to demonstrate that this ancient community does, in fact, meet
those criteria. To achieve this end, this study will examine the archeological record of
Catal Hiiyiik and offer evidence and analysis o f its complexity through an eclectic blend of
systems-ecological and social theories.
Such analysis requires, however, that the dynamic complexity that was atal
Hiiyuk be parsed into characteristic traits such as those defined in 1951 by archeologist and
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
theoretician V. Gordon Childe, which allow for an organized and systematic approach to
the study o f civilization. While Childes theories are no longer relevant, the components
o f his trait or subsystem list continue to serve as markers o f civilization and remain useful
guides when attempting to define complex urban societies (Redman 218-19). In writing
Man Makes Himself, Childe selected ten criteria that researchers can apply to ancient sites
as a measure o f their complexity and represent a means to recognize early models of
civilization. Although not causal factors in the development o f civilizations, Childes
traits represent subsystems that complex, urban centers seem to possess in common and
which are necessary markers to determine that cause. This list includes population density;
population based on residence, not kinship; labor specialization; surplus product;
monumental public works; social stratification; scientific and technological knowledge;
symbolic expression; long-distance trade; and a system o f writing (Childe, Man Makes
Himself 116-35).
Childes traits, however, are somewhat vague and arbitrary and although they are
indicative o f urban complexity and civilization, each is not necessarily an essential
component when various combinations o f others are present. Although writing ushered in
the historical period and was a prerequisite for all that was to follow in Mesopotamia and
later Egypt, this trait was not requisite for civilization to flourish. In fact, various markers
attributed to civilizations in general may be lacking in some, but they remain civilizations
nonetheless. The Incas, for example, had a thriving civilization, but lacked a written
language, and yet were able to build an empire that was vast and remarkable by any
standard (Riley 178). Although civilizations are typically associated with cities, that o f the
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
Old Kingdom of Egypt (2660-2180 B.C.E.) throve within a network of village
communities and lacked large urban centers altogether (Riley 36). Although
interpretations o f civilization vary, what they recognize in common is population density
and the ability o f society to function as a creative, producing unit, with a level of
organization that glues the individual fibers into a unified, self-sustaining whole. While
Childes traits delineate the components o f a civilization, their greatest function is as an
organizational guide to aid analysis o f the underlying dynamics o f large and productive
societies.
While there is general consensus regarding the advent o f civilization, there are
conflicting views on the status o f Catal Hiiyiik. While James Mellaart, archeologist and
original excavator o f the site in the early 1960s, claimed that atal Hiiyuk contained all the
traits o f civilization save a written language, others disagree (Excavations 19; Wason 155).
Anthropologist Walter Fairservis refers to the sodalities within atal Hiiyuk which are
indicative of a tribal or simple chiefdom level o f organization and served as the unifying
force in society, precluding any form of labor specialization other than a sexual division of
labor (187). Researcher Paul Wason argues that atal Hiiyiik was a ranked society and not
stratified and was probably, therefore, not a civilization, but he acknowledges in his 1994
work that it approaches civilization and that further excavation and research will continue
to shed light on emerging subsystems (179). Archeologists Christopher Scarre and Brian
Fagan refer to Catal Hiiyiik as a large village or town with the obvious implication that
Catal Hiiyiik lacked the characteristics of either a city or a civilization (62).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
6In light, however, o f recent excavations at the atal Hiiyiik site, evidence has
emerged that signifies greater complexity than Mellaarts work indicated, upon which
many o f the above studies were based. While various researchers have focused on
individual aspects of atal Hiiyiiks culture, a global perspective can provide insight into
the overall complexity o f this proto-urban environment. Based upon artifacts and
architecture revealed in archeologist Ian Hodders current excavations and Mellaarts work
during the 1960s, this research will assess the various subsystems, the interactions between
them, and the social environment that fostered those interactions through the systems-
ecological and social theoretical perspectives.
Testing the hypothesis that atal Hiiyiik does meet the criteria to be defined a
proto-civilization and evaluating the artifacts and architecture from this perspective offers
an alternate viewpoint to prevailing theories. Studies in prehistory are challenged by the
lack of a written record, yet the cultural material o f Catal Huyuk is so rich in texture that
this obstacle is partly overcome. Unlike Neolithic villages, Qatal Hiiyuk offers an
extensive record of symbolic artwork, burials, artifacts, skeletal remains, and architecture,
all o f which can be interpreted through the framework of an eclectic theoretical approach.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
7CHAPTER 2
MATERIALS, METHODOLOGY, AND THEORIES
Literature Review
James Mellaart amassed an astounding array o f artifacts as he excavated a complex
and symbolically embellished architecture (De La Haba 42). His work and interpretations
remain dominant themes in the modern arena despite the current excavations conducted by
Ian Hodder and other international teams (Hodder, On the Surface 1993-2004). While
much archeological work has occurred, only a fraction o f the overall site has been
excavated, leaving much to inference and the error-prone imagination. Because atal
Hiiyiik represents to date an archeological anomaly, interpretive assessments vary widely.
While much work has been done on the Neolithic milieu, little has been written on
the archeological exceptions to prevailing theory. Early twentieth-century scholars such as
V. Gordon Childe in Man Makes Himself and Lewis Mumford in The City in History
provide in-depth but generalized perspectives on the development and markers of
prehistoric man and while their theories are no longer relevant, their historical accounts
are. It is the exceptions to the general, however, that are not only the means by which to
challenge existing models but which become the tools through which knowledge is gained,
modified, or rendered obsolete. That the Neolithic cultures were the first agriculturists
remains a fact, but with the emergence o f prehistoric cities, the need to expand ones
ideological perspective becomes a necessity. Although excavation o f Neolithic sites is
ongoing, more so in Europe and Britain than in the Near East, Neolithic tells remain
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
8largely untapped. Both Jericho (an advanced Near Eastern Neolithic site) and atal
Huyuk, while exceptions to date, may indicate increased patterns of emerging complexity
as archeological investigations expand in the region of the Near East. At present, however,
evidence from atal Hiiyiik and Jericho is altering the theoretical positions of scholars
regarding the relationship o f Neolithic cultures to their Near Eastern environment.
As a result o f this changing perspective, the theoretical approach to understanding
these cultures is changing as well. Trait-system models which were popular in the 1950s
deemed subsystems as representational o f civilization and not its symptoms and were used
to delineate one civilization from another and from simpler social structures (Redman
219). Today, researchers have shifted their focus to relational aspects and adaptational
responses within society and to the environment, searching for an understanding o f that
which promoted growth, decline, homeostasis, and regulation of urban complexes.
Within this framework most modern researchers interpret civilization as the
relationship between humans and their social organization, technology, and the
environment. Cultural traits within a community, therefore, are analyzed according to their
adaptive capacity. Anthropologist Charles Redman takes this perspective in The Rise of
Civilization as he defines ancient mans move from rural to urban environments. Walter
Fairservis, too, follows this theoretical format in The Threshold o f Civilization and
addresses the cultural development of atal Hiiyiik in particular. Most researchers,
including those whose focus is on social and behavioral factors, do not deny the
importance of the relationships of man to technology and his environment and it is from
this base that they construct their theories. Social theorists, such as Julian Thomas in
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
Understanding the Neolithic, rely on material culture as an interpretive base, but do so in a
social and systems-ecological context. While much of this text is based on the historical
practices o f Neolithic societies, Thomass interpretation o f Neolithic mores is the product
o f prehistoric mans relationship with his community, his material culture, and the
environment in which he lived. This same theme is present in Ian Kuijts Life in Neolithic
Farming Communities and Paul Wasons The Archaeology of Rank. These texts address
the complexities o f Neolithic communities in Britain, Europe, and the Near East, following
an eclectic blend of systems-ecological and social theoretical models.
While much archeological theory during the early 1980s followed a natural science
protocol (processual archeology) with an emphasis on systems-ecological perspectives, the
mid-1980s brought a change in focus. Archeologists began drawing on the field of social
anthropology and the view that the context and meaning of behavior must be taken into
account when assessing ancient cultures. While this new social paradigm with proponents
such as Ian Hodder (Reading the Past and Archaeological Theory Today) has become the
trend for archeologists, this theory remains inextricably tied to the material culture and
environment and thereby relies heavily on systems-ecological theories. Ian Hodder is a
post-processual theoretician, but his perspective, too, is an eclectic mix of social,
behavioral, and systems-ecological models. Ian Hodders annual Archive Reports do not,
however, offer interpretive analysis, but chronicle his excavations at atal Hiiyuk,
cataloguing each seasons work and the architectural and cultural materials that his team
reveals.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
10
Yet, among the research that does analyze the cultural development of Qatal
Hiiyiik, there is little consensus. While some of this research posits that Qatal Hiiyiik was
an inchoate civilization, Fairservis suggests it was a simple chiefdom (187). The problem
is one of defining civilization and while Fairservis implies that civilization itself seems to
defy definition and approaches the subject tentatively, others are less reluctant and rise to
the challenge (3-9). Authors such as Carroll Riley in The Origins o f Civilization and
Carroll Quigley in The Evolution o f Civilization stress that any definition demands an
assessment beyond the confines o f the natural sciences. According to Quigley, the
formation o f a civilization is a fluid and irrational process between mutually dependent
social instruments (416). Although any definition of civilization falls short o f its reality,
this thesis will attempt to define a working model (based, in part, on the works of
Fairservis, Riley, and Quigley) that will account for the development o f Qatal Hiiyiik and
serve as the foundation for assessment o f its culture and material artifacts.
Additional references provide documentation o f Qatal Hiiyiiks artifacts,
architecture, and symbolic materials and address the geographical zone and ecological
niche from which Qatal Hiiyiik emerged. These include Ian Hodders, Roger Matthews,
and Mirjana Stevanovics Archive Reports. Catalhovuk News, and internet sources, all of
which are essential for the processing o f systems-ecological and social models.
Periodicals, texts, and journal articles specific to Qatal Hiiyuk include Louis De La Habas
Roots o f the City: Jericho and Qatal Huvuk. Dora Jane Hamblins The First Cities: The
Shrines of Qatal Hiiyiik. and James Mellaarts Catal Hiiyiik: A Neolithic Town in Anatolia.
Ozdogans Neolithic in Turkey provides a wealth o f data on Neolithic settlements and
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
11
metallurgy throughout the Anatolian Plateau and includes additional historical data on
Catal Hiiyiik.
Material on Mesopotamian culture is obtained from the works of Norman Yoffee
and Jeffery Clark in the Early Stages in the Evolution o f Mesopotamian Civilization.
Christopher Scarres and Brian Fagans Ancient Civilization provides a fund o f data on the
Mesopotamian Neolithic cultures and subsequent civilizations, as does Charles Redmans
The Rise o f Civilization, which also addresses the paleobotanical environment of the
ancient Near East.
Other references offer supplementary data, such as Joe Baumans Dry Farmers in
Desperate Trouble and Marla Malletts A Weavers View of the atal Hiiyiik
Controversy, et al., and both corroborate and challenge the views of this research and
further establish the complexity o f Qatal Hiiyuk.
Methodology
The present investigation into patterns o f complexity and the dynamic qualities of
interdependent flux examines the productivity, creativity, and cultural growth that were
Catal Hiiyuk. While Catal Hiiyiiks traits, as proposed by V. Gordon Childe, represent
subsystems of a proto-civilization, they must be addressed in the context o f modern theory.
Thus, this research applies systems-ecological and social models to determine what
enabled these subsystems to develop and propel atal Hiiyiik on its path to inchoate
civilization.
While multiple theories have evolved over the past one hundred years that attempt
to define civilization, the twenty-first century trend is toward social perspectives that place
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
12
human endeavor at the center o f urban progress. This study addresses the pertinent
theories as they apply to atal Hiiyuk and assumes an eclectic theoretical perspective, as
any study of prehistoric man precludes a strictly social point of view due to prehistorys
lack of a written record. Qatal Hiiyiik compounds this problem, as archeological
excavation is still in its early stages with little more than several acres excavated to date.
Therefore, a systems-ecological-social model is employed, as this multifaceted approach is
more responsive and revealing than viewing atal Hiiyiiks history through the confines of
a single theory. The attempt to define civilization, its development, and the traits that
compose it is integral to the understanding of Catal Hiiyiik and is the basis for the
successful application o f the systems-ecological and social paradigms.
Following the assessment of the theoretical models that are employed throughout
this research, a short history o f Near Eastern Neolithic cultures provides background for
the scope of this study, while a description o f the geography and climate o f the prehistoric
Anatolian Plateau establishes setting. The succeeding section addresses the environment
and ecological niche in which Qatal Hiiyiik throve, which was critical to its cultural
development and to the successes and failures of this community. atal Hiiyiik cannot be
separated from its environment, for it formed an inseparable union with its surroundings
and all that it was was owed to this relationship with the land and its many resources.
Catal Hiiyiiks ability to interact with and exploit its environment rendered a precocious
culture and as a result, the environmental theme remains dominant throughout the
analytical discourse o f this thesis.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
13
The city itself is the next topic in this work and is introduced through the
excavations, upon which this research is based, of James Mellaart and Ian Hodder. While
their archeological techniques and theoretical approaches are widely divergent, the
amalgamation o f their efforts has rendered a fund of cultural materials that is in the earliest
stages o f combined analysis. To gain a comprehensive portrait o f atal Hiiyiik from the
excavations o f Mellaart and Hodder and one from which theoretical analysis is possible,
the architecture and artifacts are categorized according to Childes ten subsystems.
Following this descriptive detail, Qatal Hiiyiiks subsystems and their interactions
with the environment are analyzed through the systems-ecological model, with the
ecological perspective based upon positive feedback mechanisms. This analysis is
presented in a social theoretical context and concludes with negative feedback
relationships that may have contributed to the abandonment o f atal Hiiyuk. The final
section o f this thesis addresses the results of the research and a discussion regarding those
results and closes with a summary analyzing the significance of the study, its limitations
and implications, and recommendations for future research.
Theories on the Development o f Civilizations
V. Gordon Childe was a product o f the unilinear cultural evolution paradigm that
was the prevailing tenet o f Victorian anthropology. Although Childe refined the
anthropological concepts o f savagery, barbarism, and civilization in his studies of
prehistoric and Bronze Age societies, he too assumed a linear progression and believed that
social change was simply the product o f opportunity (Scarre and Fagan 6). Childe focused
on the results o f human behavior, not its cause, and in Marxist fashion believed it was the
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
14
social group that determined the behavior o f its members, minimizing ecological factors
and the influence of the individual on group dynamics (Hodder, Archaeological Theory
144). His theories objectified society and posited that human potential was fostered
through technological progress, with the product defining the producer (Childe, Man
Makes Himself 13V Finally, in a self-limiting fashion, Childe believed the observer of the
past had more insight into ancient civilizations functions than did its participants.
While Childes views were revolutionary for the early twentieth century and
advanced the cause of scholars and in a limited capacity continue to do so through his trait
list, his theories are now gauged as outmoded and over-generalized. Childe, for example,
emphasized the significance of technology and craft specialization by full-time artisans as
a causal factor in the emergence o f civilization (Scarre and Fagan 31). Since most
researchers now view craft specialization as an indicator of social complexity, scholars
have challenged Childes theory positing that artisan specialization was often part of
egalitarian societies, as ruling chiefs also employed specialists for the production of
prestige goods (Scarre and Fagan 31). It can be argued, however, that products in
chiefdoms were produced for the ruling class in modest quantities, which likely did not
require full-time specialization. Craft specialization for mass production and consumption,
however, remains a critical and defining element of civilization, for it implies rank, surplus
and wealth, trade, and technological knowledge. Although Childes theories propelled the
study of civilization toward its present course and his traits remain the core components of
civilized society, his theories do not account for the development o f the traits themselves
or the impact that each trait had upon the other.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
15
While Childe advanced the cause and scholarship of archeology, his theories have
not kept pace with an ever-changing field. Although he believed material patterns
reflected human behavior and that behavior was socially determined, the pattern is far
more complex. Subsequent theories have focused on materials as a product o f human
behavior resulting from various components within that society in which interrelationships
helped to define the social organization as a whole. It was the sum of its parts that defined
its true meaning, despite Childes earlier claims that culture was a recurring set o f
associated artifacts or traits held to represent a people or a society (Hodder,
Archaeological Theory 285). While Childes trait list remains a useful guide to determine
urban complexity, its basic tenets provide no insight into the behavioral and ecological
factors that engendered those traits. Although his cultural-historical interpretation is
academically discredited, Childes influence remains in the field and many archeologists
and researchers continue to classify prehistoric archaeology according to regions or
artifacts (Hodder, Archaeological Theory 286).
This perspective is changing, however. Theoretical archeology has moved beyond
a mere cataloging of artifacts and the assumption that these artifacts represent the past in
its entirety. Childes Marxist view o f social relations o f production implied an economic
and deterministic view of history whereby technology and the worker (craft specialists)
were paramount in the course o f progress (Thomas 12). Archeologists and historians,
however, have expanded this thesis, emphasizing that humans can manipulate resources in
a multiplicity o f ways; therefore, what is produced is less significant than how it is
produced. It is the internal dynamics o f a society that engender resource exploitation in
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
16
unique combinations, producing complex and distinct cultures and as a result, the
mechanisms by which resource management occur vary widely within prehistoric
societies. In each event, there are varied correlations between the interrelationships o f the
various traits and the mechanisms by which they occur.
Although traits remain a guide for determining complexity, they provide little
insight into the complexity itself. These traits or subsystems, however, are the springboard
for addressing the interrelatedness o f these components in a systems framework. Unlike
Childes theoretical view that culture is a shared experience, systems theory posits that
culture is comprised o f individual stories that can be resurrected from material remains
(Redman 12-13). It is this variation among members o f a society and their social and
resource interactions that defines a culture, giving it its characteristic signature and
allowing for its understanding. Systems theorists emphasize interrelationships, many o f
which, they believe, are basic to every cultural form (Redman 11). Ancient societies
responses, however, to varied ecological zones and the unique interrelationships that
emerged, produced unique cultural forms within the confines of environmental demands.
Childes explanation of events that propelled man from the Neolithic to Bronze
Age, in which one factor produced change in another in linear fashion, is viewed quite
differently by systems theorists. Increasing complexity, they posit, is a succession of
interacting and multiple incremental processes occurring through positive feedback (which
promotes change) that is triggered by favorable ecological and cultural conditions and
increased in a series o f mutually reinforcing interactions (Redman 13). Systems theorists
view the cultural condition as a product of a larger and ever-changing ecological system
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
17
within which people adapted to their environment or attempted to do so. The societal
controls through which individuals and the larger subsystems interacted created the
foundation upon which systems analysts construct their theories. Social control, according
to systems theorists, created homeostasis between subsistence needs and ideological values
through a hierarchy o f regulation that became increasingly organized as society became
more complex. Societal pressures, however, such as warfare, population growth, and
environmental events emerged as threats to this homeostasis, stimulating adaptational
mechanisms that created either the positive feedback of cultural change or the homeostatic
inaction of negative feedback (Scarre and Fagan 39). The fundamental task o f systems
theorists, therefore, is to distinguish between the processes of change that produced
increasing complexity, the mechanisms by which that change occurred, and the socio-
environmental factors that triggered these mechanisms (Scarre and Fagan 39).
Although civilization is a cultural process, it cannot be separated from the
environment from which it emerged. Akin to systems ideologies, ecological theories stress
the impact of environmental change on developing societies through an understanding of
process and mechanism (Redman 13-14). This relationship of man to his environment and
the process of adaptation are the cornerstones o f systems-ecological theories. The bridge
between man and his habitat is culture and in its organizational, technical, and ideational
forms interacting with the environment and each other (Redman 13). The ecological
approach focuses on the interdependence of topography, flora, fauna, and natural resources
and their relationship to the development o f human culture, creating a variety o f challenges
to which regional groups responded in varied ways, thus producing distinct cultural forms.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
18
Although similar environments produced general adaptational responses among groups,
societies within a region occupied ecological niches where each focused on resources and
challenges unique to their needs, thus producing subtle cultural variety (Redman 14).
Consequently, cultures are expressed by the specific range of resources deemed essential
for that communitys survival, their manipulation o f those resources, and the oppositional
challenges that they face.
The more recent trend, however, advocates a social perspective whereby societies
are viewed as comprised o f individuals and interactive groups pursuing personal agendas
of power, ideology, and factionalism (Scarre and Fagan 41-42). Although the goal of
social theorists is to understand past societies in a behavioral context, they must do so
within the framework o f modern culture (Wason 15). One must be vigilant, therefore, to
avoid projecting modern cultural content into archeological data and be mindful of
ethnocentricity and all that it implies. It is essential, particularly regarding prehistoric
societies, that systems-ecological theories be coupled with social models as partial defense
against specious interpretations. Society, expressed in a social context, blends well with
systems-ecological models, as both address mans relationship to the material world
through processes and mechanisms. While the systems-ecological model is enhanced by
social theories inferences, systems-ecological theories can temper the extravagances
toward which a purely social perspective may stray.
The evolutionary process o f culture, whether occurring by imperceptible degrees or
as a rapid reaction to crises (but most likely both), demands a multi-theoretical
interpretation for any degree o f accuracy and logical social deduction. Social inference,
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
19
therefore, must be based on relationships o f more than chance regularity if it is to prove
irrefutable and this remains particularly challenging in the absence of a written language
(Clarke 485). Although social inference is always biased, it can shed light on the behavior
and motivations o f ancient man when applied in conjunction with systems-ecological
theories.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
20
CHAPTER 3
THE NEOLITHIC POPULATION AND ENVIRONMENT
The Geography, Climate, and Ecology o f the Anatolian Plateau
The geographic environment in which Qatal Huyiik emerged is a rugged land mass
surrounded on three sides by water with its eastern border protected by an imposing
mountain range. The varied landscape of Turkey is the product of earthquakes and
volcanic activity and is part o f the enormous Alpine belt that extends from the Himalaya
Mountains to the Atlantic Ocean. Formed during the Tertiary period (sixty-five million to
1.6 million B.C.E.), the Arabian, African, and Indian continental plates began their
collision with the Eurasian plate and the sedimentary layers deposited by the prehistoric
Tethyan Sea bucked, folded, and uplifted (Turkey: External Sec. 1). This process,
accompanied by strong volcanic activity and intrusions of igneous rock material, was
followed by extensive faulting during the Quaternary period, beginning approximately 1.6
million B.C.E. (Turkey: External Sec. 1). Lying between two folded mountain ranges,
the earthquake-prone and structurally complex Anatolian Plateau consists of uplifted
blocks and down-folded troughs, covered by ancient deposits. In Asiatic Turkey, however,
few areas are flat, save the coastal plains o f Antalya and Adana, the deltas of the
Kizilirmak River, the valley floors o f the Gediz and Buyukmenderes Rivers and several
regions in the high plains o f Anatolia, namely around Tuz Golu and the Konya Basin,
home to Qatal Hiiyiik (Turkey: External Sec. 1).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
21
Lying north of atal Hiiyuk and parallel to the Black Sea are the Pontus
Mountains, increasing in stature as they traverse the coast from west to east, reaching
heights of nearly ten thousand feet (Turkey: Pontus Sec. 1). Mountain rivers flow
toward the Black Sea and while the northern slopes are home to dense growths of
evergreen and deciduous trees, the southern and inland slopes remain treeless. Along the
Mediterranean coast rise the Taurus Mountains, a folded chain that trends easterly to the
Arabian Platform, then arcs northward until the Taurus and Pontus ranges converge. A
more rugged chain than the Pontus Mountains and with fewer rivers, the Taurus Mountains
were an ancient barrier except for passes such as the Cilician Gates in south-central
Turkey. Lying between the two mountain ranges in the central region o f Turkey, however,
are the semiarid highlands of Anatolia, ranging in elevation from west to east, two
thousand to four thousand feet. Throughout the folded mountains and the Anatolian
Plateau lie well-defined basins, some narrow, others, such as the Konya Plain, large basins
of inland drainage, resulting in generally saline lakes throughout the region.
As the massive Pleistocene lakes that formed these basins began to recede in
earnest around the eighth millennium B .C .E., the lower portion of the Konya Plain began
to emerge. The exposed land was fertile and well-watered and offered a hospitable
environment for flora and fauna. The ecological conditions were ripe for organic variety,
fecundity, and the adaptation of a wide range o f plant and animal species. Fairservis noted,
At least three forms of deer, the ibex, wild ass, pig, auroch, wild ox, gazelle, leopard, lion,
fox, weasel, wolf, sheep, goat, bear, rabbit, wild cat, marten, jackal, marsh birds, and the
land tortoise were found in abundance (160). Fish-filled lakes and streams and mollusks
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
22
were plentiful as well. As a result of the warming trend that occurred at the end of the
Pleistocene epoch, trees, grasses and wild grains spread into the Near East, promoting
hybridization o f wild plant species, some o f which were amenable to domestication and
cultivation (Ozdogan and Basgelen 14).
This prehistoric plateau and surrounding areas offered diverse ecological and
climatic zones, from forested mountains, to semiarid highlands, to coastal plains, offering a
wide range of organic and inorganic resources. The abundance o f products on the Konya
Plain, however, promoted and supported sedentary living and offered the best of both
worlds during the transition from hunting and gathering to the domestication of plants and
animals. This rich environment and all that it nourished drew the hunters and gatherers of
the Anatolian Plateau, for the Konya Plain possessed what other areas lacked: the alluvial
soils o f the (^arsamba ay.
With the advent o f the Holocene epoch, climatic conditions have changed little on
the Konya Plain and if they remain challenging to village life today, they were all the more
so to the Neolithic population. This semiarid region receives an historic precipitation of
twelve inches per year, but rainfall is unpredictable and during frequent droughts, fewer
than eight inches of annual precipitation may occur (Turkey: Pontus Sec. 1). The aridity
creates frequent dust storms in the summer, blowing fine yellow dust across the plateau,
making the Konya Plain one of the driest and dustiest regions in Turkey (Turkey: Pontus
Sec. 1). The cold and snows of winter, however, are equally challenging and while
summer temperatures are often in excess of one hundred degrees, winters can plunge
below zero (Turkey: Climate Sec. 1).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
23
As the Paleolithic epoch gave way to modern climates, hunting and gathering
bands began their transition from seasonal base-camps, often located in caves, to the
occupation o f regions which lay in open areas more favorable to agricultural
experimentation and the domestication o f animals (Redman 98). It was within the fertile
but challenging environment o f the Konya Plain that the transition from hunting and
gathering to the sowing of seed occurred and it was a move that revolutionized the world
and propelled humans on their course toward civilization.
Chronology o f Neolithic History
Anthropologist Charles Redman writes that for ninety-nine percent of the 500,000-
year-history of man, men and women subsisted by hunting and gathering (89). From this
Pleistocene history emerged the twelve-thousand-year-old Neolithic culture where the
physiologically modern and sedentary human produced exponential growth in technology,
which enabled progress to occur at a sharply accelerated pace. What brought man to the
portals o f civilization, however, remains an enigma in the arena of scientific debate. One
precipitating event may well have been the climatic changes that produced concentrations
of organic resources. During the transition to the interglacial period, roving bands o f Near
Eastern hunters and gatherers sustained themselves with forced movement amongst a
dispersed food and timber supply. As the climate warmed, however, and plant species and
riparian environments proliferated along with the animals they supported, human density
increased in richly concentrated resource zones, reducing migratory patterns.
As population increased in newly prime habitats, so, too, did competition for
resources, thereby increasing human vulnerability to privation and necessitating large-scale
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
24
herding as the means for successful resource acquisition and its protection. Mans herding
behavior represents an innate self-protective mechanism expressed through the guise of
solidarity, as the individual overcomes his vulnerability en masse. As early humans
banded together in the hunt, their cunning for survival exceeded their vulnerabilities, due
in large part to united and coordinated effort.
As bands became sedentary tribes and settled into the rigors o f village life,
experimentation with domestication began in earnest. By 7000 B.C.E., morphological
changes in sheep appeared in the Near East, producing the hornless female species that is
indicative o f domestication. Dogs, too, appear to have been domesticated in this region
during the same period, although the earliest domesticated canine excavated in the Near
East dates to 11,000 B.C.E. (Redman 135). Around 6000 B.C.E., domesticated cattle were
a significant part o f atal Huyiiks economy, but domesticated cattle were evident in
southeastern Europe a millennium earlier (Redman 139-40).
Experimentation with domestication o f cereal grains, and einkorn wheat in
particular, began at approximately the same time as did animal domestication, but which
came first has not to date been proved. Domestication of wild grains, as with animals,
produces morphological changes (Redman 142). Whereas the axis is brittle in wild species
of einkorn wheat, allowing for disarticulation and dispersal o f seeds, in domesticated
einkorn, the axis breaks only with threshing and the seeds stay intact (Redman 123). This
domesticated product produced a symbiotic relationship whereby the plants survival
depended upon humans for the acts of reaping and sowing, which increased mans
dependency upon sedentariness. By 6800 B.C.E., the climate had warmed to an optimal
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
25
temperature zone for agricultural development in Anatolia and southwestern Asia and
radical advances in domestication began under the aegis o f the newly-emerged Ceramic
Neolithic cultures.
It is probable, however, that experimentation with domestication began long before
the fact, but attributing a specific time-frame would be mere speculation. This is true of
both animal and plant domestication and while the earliest villages indicate mixed
economies, they trended through time toward a predominant dependence upon
domesticated food sources. Such was the case in Catal Hiiyuk, which exhibited this
primary dependence upon domesticated products by the seventh millennium B.C.E.
(Redman 183).
While tool construction during the Epi-Paleolithic period throughout the Near East
continued as microlithic and included blades o f chipped stone, the emergence of local
differentiation regarding material usage and technology had begun (Ozdogan and Basgelen
14-15). Although sporadic attempts at primitive pottery began prior to 7200 B C E . , the
Near Eastern Ceramic Neolithic population emerged in earnest between 7200 and 5000
B C E , along with halting experimentation in metallurgy (Yoffee and Clark 241-48).
Symbolic expression developed within art and architecture, as indicated by recurring
designs and color themes, and trade in obsidian and luxury materials began as well,
perhaps suggesting inchoate labor specialization (Redman 184-85). Within five millennia,
the move from the Natufian settlements o f the Levant (10,000-8000 B.C.E.) to the late
Neolithic cultures o f Mesopotamia executed the transition to complexity, whereby
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
26
technological growth exploded and mans accelerated progress catapulted him into the
glory o f Uruk and beyond.
This explosive growth in Neolithic technology has received intense archeological
and theoretical focus in the region of northern Mesopotamia, and about these Neolithic
societies much is known. This research has increased our understanding of Neolithic
cultures, particularly as precursors to the Sumerian civilization of southern Mesopotamia.
Although the significance o f the archeological and anthropological studies cannot be
minimized, from these has emerged a stereotypic chronology o f the development of
Neolithic cultures and subsequent Sumerian civilization. This chronology is significant to
this study, as it is one that this research has opted to challenge, claiming instead that urban
complexity was demonstrated in atal Huyiik three thousand years before the rise o f Uruk.
As the Neolithic population gained firm footing in the region o f northern
Mesopotamia, they set the course that defined the development of Sumerian civilization.
From the Hassuna period o f the sixth millennium B.C.E., characterized by crude pottery,
incipient agriculture, and domestication o f animals, emerged the Halafian period (5500-
4800 B.C.E.) that made marked cultural advances in this region (Riley 29-31). Symbolic
expression and religious beliefs became increasingly sophisticated and although the
Halafian culture created beautifully-designed pottery and engaged in metallurgy and
extensive trade, o f greater importance was the standardization of products and architecture
over a region o f nearly two hundred fifty square miles (Redman 199). Most significant,
however, were the organizational changes that propelled the late Neolithic cultures of
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
Reproduced with
permission
of the copyright owner.
Further reproduction prohibited
without permission.
B.C.E. Anatolia Mesopotamia
Southern Mesopotamia3000
4000
CentralMesopotamia Mesopotamia
Northern
5000
ChogaMamiHassuna
6000Umm
Dabaghiyah
7000Hacilar Suberde
QatalHiiyiikCayontt
8000
Fig. 1. Neolithic Sites Represented in Grey. to~o
-
28
northern Mesopotamia on a course from chiefdom governance toward state organization
(Redman 202). Between the Neolithic cultures of northern Mesopotamia and those of the
arid southern region was the Neolithic Samarran society, located on the northern boundary
of the Mesopotamian alluvium.
Contemporary with the middle to late Hassunan and Halafian cultures, the
Samarrans settled south of the dependable dry farming zone, with botanical evidence
suggesting that by 5500 B.C.E. they were employing some form o f simple irrigation
(Redman 195). Their communities had both technological and organizational skills that
are reflected in the fifteen-acre Samarran town o f Choga Mami, which had a population in
excess o f one thousand people. Archeological investigation has revealed that this
Neolithic town possessed surplus wealth, used stamp seals, and produced sculpture that
resembled later Ubaid art. The Samarrans were also the first in Mesopotamia to build
buttressed structures with sun-dried brick. Excavations have produced several hammered
copper pieces (the earliest metal works found in Mesopotamia), suggesting trade with the
distant regions of Iran and Turkey, as this region of Mesopotamia is resource-poor and
lacks deposits of copper. Because o f the presence o f Samarran pottery at Hassunan and
Halafian sites, archeologists suggest that there was contact between these cultures and that
diffusion occurred. Due to their southerly occupation, historians believe the Samarrans
were likely among the early colonizers o f the first civilizations o f southern Mesopotamia
(Redman 194-98).
As the Ubaid period emerged on virgin soil around 5300 B.C.E., likely influenced
by Samarran and possibly Halafian cultures, a period o f intense and rapid specialization
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
29
occurred, with an accrual o f surplus wealth that enabled monumental temples to be erected
to capricious gods (Riley 31). Historians and archeologists assert that the traits identified
by Childe emerged and coalesced in the region of southern Mesopotamia during the fourth
millennium B.C.E. (Postgate 24; Redman 245). By the Uruk period (3600-3100 B.C.E ),
explosive developments occurred in technology, ranked society became stratified, and
skilled artisans became specialized, culminating in the Jemdet Nasr period (3100-2900
B .C.E.) with the advent o f cuneiform script (3100 B .C.E.). By 2900 B .C.E., the major
cities o f southern Mesopotamia had achieved sufficient complexity to be deemed a
civilization (Redman 245).
Yet seven hundred miles to the west and an even more distant three thousand years
in ancient Mesopotamias past, an anomalous community emerged on the Konya Plain that
possessed the very qualities attributed to the Mesopotamian Ubaid period. Despite atal
Hiiyiiks incomparable development, however, Neolithic settlements were numerous on the
Anatolian Plateau, most o f which had mixed subsistence economies (Ozdogan and
Basgelen 15). Seventh-millennium Suberde, which lies to the west of atal Huyiik, was
typical of the Neolithic Anatolian village. While small numbers of sickle blades and
grinding stones suggest a cereal component to their diet, great numbers o f animal bones
have been excavated (principally sheep and goats) whose skeletal remains declined in
Suberdes upper levels as wild populations declined in Anatolia, suggesting that these
animals were not domesticated (Fairservis 160). This village was an example o f how
sedentary lifestyles were possible while maintaining hunting and gathering practices in a
habitat that supported both. The environment was so richly diverse within a concentrated
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
30
radius that generations gradually evolved from roving bands to sedentary tribes without
sharp demarcations in lifestyles.
What many o f these Anatolian settlements like Suberde lacked, however, were the
rich alluvial soils that supported large-scale experimentation with plant domestication;
hence, village populations remained small with a heavy reliance upon feral meat and wild
grains. In contrast, the ecological niche of atal Hiiyiik had soils that the flooding
Qarsamba River frequently renewed and was, therefore, amenable to large-scale
cultivation. The river and alluvial parklands likely attracted large numbers o f animals and
the branching river may have formed natural enclosures that could have enhanced the
domestication o f cattle and other potential livestock. While Suberde was typical o f early
village life in the fruitful Anatolian region, the hunters and gatherers who settled on the
Konya Plain had descended upon a veritable Eden. While many o f the Anatolian villagers
were experimenting with simple plant and animal domestication as an adjunct to hunting
and gathering practices, atal Hiiyiik was supporting six thousand people on a diet
consisting predominantly o f domesticated food products.
Although researchers have generally regarded the Near Eastern Neolithic
population as ancillary to what they view as the main event, atal Hiiyiik surpassed
Hassunan, Halafian, and even Samarran achievements. This precocious development and
early challenge to ancient Mesopotamian cultures will be the focus o f this thesis and the
means by which to determine whether atal Hiiyiik stands as a proto-civilization. Far from
being a mere pastoral and agricultural antecedent, the Neolithic city o f atal Hiiyiik stands
as testament to the potential o f Stone Age man.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
31
CHAPTER 4
THE SUBSYSTEMS OF CATAL HUYUK
Within this resource-rich and fertile region of the Anatolian Plateau, Catal Huyuk
rises as a great oval mound on the Konya Plain, rising fifty-seven feet above the
surrounding landscape. This thirty-two acre site slopes sharply on its long eastern and
western flanks, declines gently toward the south and descends into a lower secondary
hump at its northern end. Along the base o f the eastern side o f the mound is an extended
area of low-lying Neolithic occupation correlating to Catal Huyuks later phases of
habitation (Mellaart, Catal Huyiik 31 -32), While the ancient Neolithic site of Jericho has a
depositional depth of forty-five feet, Catal Hiiyiik extends to depths of sixty-five feet, but
archeologists have not yet excavated to virgin soil (Ozdogan and Basgelen 158).
Australian James Mellaart was the first to excavate this mound in 1961. Over the
course o f four years, he opened a one-acre excavation on the western slope and proved that
even in early strata, Catal Huyiik was a city o f substantial size. Mellaart labeled these
emerging levels, from the surface to the bottom, as Levels 0 through XII, with two
different building levels in VI: VI A and V IB fCatal Hiiyiik 49). Although Mellaarts
excavations o f Catal Huyiik produced astonishing results, political intrigue between
Mellaart and the Turkish government subsequently stopped excavation for twenty-seven
years. By 1993, however, archeologist Ian Hodder and an international team initiated
collaboration with the British Institute of Archeology at Ankara and the McDonald
Institute for Archeology and resumed excavation of this large and intriguing Neolithic site.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
Fig. 2. Neolithic Sites in Southern Anatolia and Sources o f Raw Materials. Courtesy o f Janies Mellaart, Catal Huvuk: A Neolithic Town In Anatolia
(London: Thames & Hudson Ltd., 1967) 28-29.
-
33
Ian Hodder and Janies Mellaart, however, differ from one another scientifically and
philosophically, which is reflected in both their writing and their work at atal Hiiyiik. A
postprocessualist concerned with issues o f inference, sampling, and research design,
Hodder emphasizes the importance o f art and artifacts as clues to the cognition o f early
man (Hodder, Reading the Past 156). His interpretations are multivocal (or multicultural)
and like the physicist, stress that the researcher cannot separate from the experiment and,
therefore, influences the interpretation.
Hodders multivocal perspectives are, in fact, in direct contrast to Mellaarts
Eurocentric interpretations. The postprocessualist world denies that there is one reality
(Hodder, Archaeological Theory 3-8). Hodder claims that undetached objectivity remain
an impossibility and that no single reality can be gleaned from the excavation o f atal
Hiiyiik, but instead the site offers many realities (Reading 159-61; Kunzig 1-2). Because
o f this, Hodder relies on the scientific observation by multivocal teams o f archeologists as
they dig because, he believes, interpretation o f cultural materials remains subjective, based
upon the context in which they are found and the social context o f the excavator (Hodder,
Reading the Past 168).
Hodders perspective as the scientific researcher and theoretician is opposed to
Mellaarts expansive exploratory approach (Hodder, Archaeological Theory 1-5). While
Mellaart excavated the obvious artifacts and skeletal remains and assessed architectural
structures from a global perspective, Hodder focuses on minutia and often on that which
cannot be seen, but are visible through the lens of a microscope. Whereas Mellaart
excavated two hundred buildings in four seasons and Hodder only three in seven years,
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
34
Hodder believes his approach will yield a richer and deeper interpretation o f atal Huyuks
complex social structure (Kunzig 2).
Although the focus on scientific analysis has revealed significant data that build on
Mellaarts work, Hodder has since stated that the preoccupation with the details of specific
houses should return to the bigger picture . . . and work on how the site as a whole was
organized (Matthews and Hodder, C^atalhovuk 1994 2). As Kenzig states, however, The
great risk [Hodder] runs is that the lack o f quantity in his work will translate into lack of
quality: that he will never find enough evidence to say much of anything (4). In
Hodders opinion, however, analysis o f archeological methodology is as important as the
excavation and discussion of the artifacts themselves a viewpoint that renders his
archeology a protracted process (Hodder, Reading the Past 182-83).
The postprocessualist Hodder also assumes a more abstract theoretical stance than
did Mellaart, whose pragmatic theories were focused on interpreting the cultural materials
and inferring the social structure of atal Hiiyiik from these remains. Hodder, in contrast,
formulates social theories that he hopes can be proved by cultural materials. An example
is Hodders theory that before domestication of plants and animals occurred, humans had
to tame the brute within and the dangers associated with death, reproduction, and female
sexuality, all o f which represented a cultural and psychological transition to sedentary
lifestyles (Kunzig 5). Hodder hopes to verify this theory through the evidence found
within the art of atal Huyiik (Kunzig 5). Some may argue, however, that Hodder loses
himself in expressionistic interpretation much as did abstract artist Jackson Pollock, whose
paintings say little, but are busy nonetheless.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
35
That the general (Mellaarts work) has been followed by the specific (Hodders
archeology) has provided an insightful assessment o f the cultural milieu of atal Hiiyiik.
Hodders work has shown exceptions to the general, thereby challenging the conception of
absolute uniformity characteristic o f earlier research. Hodders archeological techniques,
while not as expansive as Mellaarts, are certainly more intensive and while the overall
plan of the city remains an enigma, much cultural material has emerged within the last
decade that is relevant to this thesis and is addressed in detail throughout the study.
Hodders theories, however, challenge Mellaarts interpretations o f atal Hiiyiiks
material inventory; whereas Mellaart asserted the maximum potential of this Neolithic
population, Hodder denies atal Hiiyiiks complexity and compares it to the simple social
structure of primitive African tribes (Kunzig 4-5). Hodder believes, for example, that the
residents of atal Hiiyiik relied on hunting and gathering as much as they did farming,
based upon analysis o f bone fragments o f feral goats and the emergence of wild plant
remains discovered through the process o f floatation. Domesticated food products,
however, were abundant throughout the site and visible to the naked eye and while atal
Hiiyiik probably had a mixed economy, it decidedly favored domesticated grains and
animals, as these products were present in greater quantities than were wild-crafted or feral
products. Large storage bins were a feature common to the homes throughout the site and
residents typically used them to store domesticated grains and legumes, which were
obviously a staple in the diet o f this population. Ian Todd concurs with Mellaarts view as
well, stating that residents relied on domesticated cattle for meat, which comprised
approximately ninety percent of their animal protein intake (120).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
36
Hodder also argues that there are no temples or palaces in Catal Hiiyiik and,
therefore, central leadership was unlikely, contrasting Mellaarts belief that the orderly
structure of Catal Hiiyiik demanded some form of central control. Instead, Hodder
believes that residents may have been ruled by clan leaders or their lives may have been
the product of simple ritual and taboo (Kunzig 5). Given the minimal areas of excavation
to date (less than five percent), this research concurs with Mehmet Ozdogan, who argues
that central administration and ceremonial centers cannot be definitively proved (or
refuted) based upon existing evidence (158). What challenges the imagination, however, is
how a densely-quartered population of six thousand could have co-existed without some
form of central management.
Hodder also posits that Mellaarts shrines were merely elaborate houses (which
could speak for stratification, which Hodder refutes) and, therefore, denies that there was a
priestly caste or organized religion (Kunzig 5). Thus, he disagrees with Mellaarts
conception that Catal Hiiyiik was a goddess community, arguing instead that the female
statuettes and elaborate reliefs represented not the divine, but domesticity (Kunzig 5).
Christopher Scarre and Brian Fagan, too, question whether Mellaarts shrines were truly
that or instead, richly decorated houses (62-63). Paul Wason also remains uncertain
whether Catal Hiiyiik engaged in goddess-centered worship (179).
Yet, despite challenges to Mellaarts interpretations of the artifacts, art, and
architecture o f Catal Hiiyiik, his work remains integral to most scholarly critiques of Catal
Hiiyiiks culture because of the vast array o f cultural materials his horizontal excavation
techniques revealed. Theoretical conflict, however, will continue until larger sections of
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
37
the mound are excavated and the overall design of the site begins to emerge, but with the
current techniques of Ian Hodder this is likely years away. In the interim, through the
diligent effort and theoretical challenges o f scientists and archeologists, the archeological
inventory continues to grow and with it, insight into the cultural past that was Catal Huyiik.
It is the goal of this study to investigate the cultural materials excavated by
Mellaart and Hodder in an attempt to unite past and present research and gain partial
understanding o f the social structure o f Catal Hiiyiik. To achieve this goal, this chapter
topically categorizes Mellaarts and Hodders material inventories according to Childes
trait list, establishing a foundation for subsequent analysis through the systems-ecological
and social models in Chapters 5 and 6.
The Architectural Design of Catal Huyiik as a Monumental Public Work
This prehistoric site lies along an ancient branch of the Carsamba River on the
northern frontiers of the Konya Plain, three thousand feet above sea level on the southern
boundary o f the great salt depression at Tuz Golu. Although Mellaarts radiocarbon dates
indicate Catal Hiiyiiks settlement began between 6500 and 5400 B.C.E., American
dendrochronologist Maryanne Newton has deemed its founding closer to 7200 B.C.E.,
based upon analysis o f juniper charcoal fragments removed from the base o f the
excavation site (Pre-Sumerian Cultures 4-5). Scarre and Fagan concur (63), while
Ozdogan suggests initial occupation may predate this, as approximately 16.4 feet of earlier
settlement lies beneath Mellaarts lowest level (158). From this ancient foundation, Catal
Hiiyiik was to thrive for nearly sixteen hundred years and following its mysterious decline
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
38
by 5600 B.C.E., a smaller Chalcolithic mound grew to its west on the opposite bank of the
Carsamba River and throve for another seven hundred years (Matthews and Hodder,
Catalhovuk 1994 1-6).
Within the more ancient eastern mound, however, lies a honeycomb of contiguous,
rectangular structures constructed o f sun-dried mud-brick that resemble the pueblos of the
American Southwest. New buildings were erected upon the carefully leveled foundations
o f the old, were generally uniform in design (some had a smaller second story), and were
constructed around courtyards o f varying sizes (Hamblin 49). The courtyards served as
community waste disposal sites that locals carefully sterilized with neutralizing ash to
minimize odor and prevent disease (Stevanovic 3).
Although it has been emphasized that residents gained access to their living
quarters through openings in flat roofs, 2003 excavations have revealed evidence of
ground-level entrances as well (Hodder, Catalhoviik News 6-7). Excavated roof surfaces,
however, smudged, scorched, and discolored, appeared to have been the main arena of
domestic activity during the summer season (Stevanovic 3). These well-made structures,
with foundations sunk significantly below floor level, had a series of small ventilating
windows cut into the upper walls and were constructed o f local mud-brick and timber
from the Taurus Mountains, lying approximately seventy-five miles to the southeast
(Mellaart, Catal Huviik 55).
The interiors o f the buildings contained built-in mud-brick sleeping platforms and
benches, and included sunken pit stoves and hearths for cooking and heating (Wason 176).
Residents plastered their interior walls with white or cream-colored clay, smoothed them
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
39
Fig. 3. Schematic Reconstruction o f a Section o f Level VI. Courtesy o f James Mellaart, Catal Htiytlk:
A Neolithic Town In Anatolia (London: Thames & Hudson Ltd., 1967) 62.
Fig. 4. Diagrammatic View o f Construction Technique at Catal Huyuk. Courtesy o f James Mellaart,
Catal Htivuk: A Neolithic Town In Anatolia (London: Thames & Hudson Ltd., 1967) 61.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
Fig. 5. Building Plan - Level VI A. Courtesy o f James Mellaart, Catal HUvtik: A Neolithic Town In
Anatolia (London: Thames & Hudson Ltd., 1967) 58.
Fig. 6. Building Plan - Level VI B. Courtesy o f James Mellaart, Catal Huvilk: A Neolithic
Town In Anatolia (London: Thames & Hudson Ltd., 1967) 59.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
41
with polishers, and frequently painted them with naturalistic subjects and designs (Wason
176). Floors had plastered surfaces and occasionally supported a bucranium, which was a
small pillar o f brick with horn cores and the facial features of a wild bull placed on top
(Mellaart, Catal Huvuk 65). Most buildings had a storeroom, some with dried-clay grain
bins approximately three feet high that were filled from the top and emptied through a
small opening at the base, so that the oldest grains and those most likely exposed to
dampness would be used first (Mellaart, Catal Huyiik 62).
Throughout Catal Hiiyiik, residents kept buildings meticulously clean and
renovated them inside and out on what appears to have been an annual basis, with locals
obviously taking civic pride in their orderly and well-planned city (Mellaart, Catal Hiiyiik
54-65). Some buildings had as many as one hundred layers o f plaster on their walls,
indicating frequent and possibly seasonal re-plastering (Fairservis 153). Mellaart, in fact,
reported that annual re-plastering during summer months of the high-maintenance sun-
dried brick dwellings continued in the Anatolian region of Turkey even as he excavated
Catal Hiiyiik (Catal Hiiyiik 49). Mehmet Ozdogan supports Mellaarts claims o f annual re
plastering based upon dendrochronological sequence studies completed by Kuniholm and
Newton in 1996 (159-60).
Residents built these once-meticulous structures o f near identical design with
standardized sun-dried bricks and squared timber framing that was eventually replaced
with internal buttresses in Level II (Mellaart, Catal Hiiviik 64). The interiors are uniform
as well, with kitchen and hearth on southern walls and flat-topped ovens set partly into the
wall (Mellaart, Catal Hiiyiik 56). Kitchen spaces occupy one-third of the domestic space
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
42
and a small square platform was placed in the northeastern corner; a large platform with a
bench on its southern end was constructed on the eastern wall and flanked by two wooden
posts that were often painted red (Mellaart, Catal Huyiik 56-58). An additional platform
was located in the southwestern corner close to the oven. This was the arrangement of
buildings constructed on a northern to southerly axis. Those with an east-west orientation
have a somewhat different, but uniform design, but the large platform and bench remain
against eastern walls (Mellaart, Catal Hiiyiik 58-60).
Adjacent to obvious residences, Mellaart excavated forty buildings in his one-acre
site that appear to be religious shrines, not because o f structural differences, but because of
the elaborate and extensive art that adorns the walls and floor spaces o f these ornate and
mysterious enclaves. This research concurs with Mellaarts interpretation that these
buildings were indeed shrines (Catal Hiivuk 77-130). Some have speculated that they were
elaborate homes; if homes, however, they would have been hazardous and inconvenient for
activities o f daily living, particularly if small children were present. One could easily have
become impaled with a misstep on the numerous, centrally-placed bucrania and massive
horn cores lining platforms. Bulls heads complete with horns protruding at floor level
from walls would have impeded ambulation and these elaborate homes, if that is what they
were, would not have been conducive to family life.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
43
Fig. 7. Restoration o f the Eastern and Southern Walls o f Shrine VI. 14. Courtesy o f James Mellaart,
Catal Hilytlk: A Neolithic Town In Anatolia (London: Thames & Hudson Ltd., 1967) 121.
Fig. 8. Decoration o f Northern and Eastern Walls o f Shrine VI A.8 Courtesy o f James Mellaart,
Catal Hitvuk: A Neolithic Town In Anatolia (London: Thames & Hudson Ltd., 1967) 28-29.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
44
Although it has been long reported that little variation existed in the architectural
design of the city, evidence is emerging to the contrary. In Level II, Mellaart and his team
excavated a tower-like structure that is filled with enormous quantities o f burnt mud-brick
that also extend externally from the structure, indicating this tower was taller than the
surrounding complex f^atal Hiivuk 69-70).
Lying north o f what appears to be two shrines separated by an open passage, this
tower-like structure obstructs entry into Catal Huyiik. To its immediate left lies a crooked
cul-de-sac that leads to a series o f storerooms that are neither extensions o f homes nor
shrines.
Additional anomalies occur in a forty-by-forty meter surface excavation (hence
labeled the 4040 site) that was begun in 2003 which revealed open linear areas o f varying
widths that appear as possible streets or alleys (Lyon and Taylor 2). Whether these linear
spaces end abruptly or change course beyond the boundaries o f the 4040 site is uncertain,
but the first street runs in a north-south direction with two separate linear spaces
intersecting at right angles from the southern section. These open linear spaces range in
width from twenty feet to a mere twelve inches, although the narrow sections may have
been the result of later building encroachment. The overall plan in the 4040 area suggests
buildings formed distinct sectors separated by streets.
Wall thickness varies between these sectors as well, possibly as a means to control
internal temperatures in a region of climatic extremes or as an indicator o f social
inequality. Wall thickness, however, remains uniform within the sector and the consistent
orientation of buildings within each sector differs from those of other sectors and suggests
Reproduced with permission of the copyright